Cost savings from medication reviews in community pharmacies for nursing home residents in Estonia: a case study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the cost savings from medication reviews conducted for individuals living in nursing homes in Estonia. Medication reviews performed as part of the automated dose dispensing (ADD) service by community pharmacies might help identify suboptimal medicine regimens. METHODS: We use a case study approach to identify suboptimal use of medication in treatment plans and estimate the potential cost saving from medication reviews. To achieve this, we assess 101 treatment plans submitted for medication review by nursing homes in Estonia between 2021 and 2023. Additionally, we run OLS regressions to identify the most important determinants of medication cost savings. RESULTS: We estimate an average direct cost saving of €43.62 per patient per year, which corresponds to 8.27% of the average annual medication costs. If medication reviews were conducted for all elderly individuals over 75 years old who use six or more prescription medicines, nearly 2% of Estonia's pharmaceutical budget could be saved. Regression analysis indicates that the most significant contributors to these cost savings are suboptimal use of generics, incorrect dosages (too high), and the elimination of incorrect medications. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that annual medication reviews conducted as part of the ADD service might help reduce medication expenditure when offered to a wider public.

COVID-19-related medicine utilization study in pregnancy: The COVI-PREG cohort.

AIM: The objective of this study was to describe the use of COVID-19-related medicines during pregnancy and their evolution between the early/late periods of the pandemic. METHODS: Pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from March 2020 to July 2021 were included using the COVI-PREG registry. Exposure to the following COVID-19-related medicines was recorded: antibiotics, antivirals, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, anti-interleukin-6 and immunoglobulins. We described the prevalence of medicines used, by trimester of pregnancy, maternal COVID-19 severity level and early/late period of the pandemic (before and after 1 July 2020). FINDINGS: We included 1964 pregnant patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 10.4% (205/1964) received at least one COVID-19-related medicine including antibiotics (8.6%; 169/1694), corticosteroids (3.2%; 62/1964), antivirals (2.0%; 39/1964), hydroxychloroquine (1.4%; 27/1964) and anti-interleukin-6 (0.3%; 5/1964). The use of at least one COVID-19-related medicine was 3.1% (12/381) in asymptomatic individuals, 4.2% (52/1233) in outpatients, 19.7% (46/233) in inpatients without oxygen, 72.1% (44/61) in those requiring standard oxygen, 95.7% (22/23) in those requiring high flow oxygen, 96.2% (25/26) in patients who required intubation and 57.1% (4/7) among patients who died. The proportion who received medicines to treat COVID-19 was higher before than after July 2020 (16.7% vs. 7.7%). Antibiotics, antivirals and hydroxychloroquine had lower rates of use during the late period. CONCLUSION: Medicine use in pregnancy increased with disease severity. The trend towards increased use of corticosteroids seems to be aligned with changing guidelines. Evidence is still needed regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19-related medicines in pregnancy.

Medicine use in children aged under 12 years-Population survey in Finland.

PURPOSE: To study the prevalence of prescribed and over-the-counter (OTC) medicine use in children under 12 years of age in Finland and to examine factors associated with the medicine use. METHODS: A nationwide population survey was carried out in Finland in spring 2018 with a random sample of children under 12 years (n = 8000). A response rate of 24% (n = 1921) was attained. The questionnaire was sent to the child's primary guardian. Current use of prescribed medicines and the use of OTC medicines in the preceding 2 days were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Of all the children 19% had used prescribed medicines, 15% OTC medicines, and 31% either prescription or OTC medicines during the preceding 22 days. Children's health related factors were positively associated with prescribed medicine use including fairly good to poor health status, symptoms experienced, and illnesses diagnosed by a physician. The guardian's healthcare education and use of prescribed medicines were also associated with children's prescribed medicine use. Symptoms of illnesses and fairly good health status were found to be associated with childrens' use of OTC medicines. CONCLUSIONS: The use of medicines in children under 12 years of age is quite common in Finland. As expected, children's health-related factors were associated with medicine use. Also, guardians' healthcare education and the use of prescribed medicines were associated with children's prescription medicine use. Children's medicine use should be continuously monitored and investigated further to identify the reasons leading to appropriate and inappropriate medicine use in children.

Uptake of pharmacist recommendations by patients after discharge: Implementation study of a patient-centered medicines review service.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medicine use is common in older people, resulting in harm increased by lack of patient-centred care. Hospital clinical pharmacy services may reduce such harm, particularly prevalent at transitions of care. An implementation program to achieve such services can be a complex long-term process. OBJECTIVES: To describe an implementation program and discuss its application in the development of a patient-centred discharge medicine review service; to assess service impact on older patients and their caregivers. METHOD: An implementation program was begun in 2006. To assess program effectiveness, 100 patients were recruited for follow-up after discharge from a private hospital between July 2019 and March 2020. There were no exclusion criteria other than age less than 65 years. Medicine review and education were provided for each patient/caregiver by a clinical pharmacist, including recommendations for future management, written in lay language. Patients were asked to consult their general practitioner to discuss those recommendations important to them. Patients were followed-up after discharge. RESULTS: Of 368 recommendations made, 351 (95%) were actioned by patients, resulting in 284 (77% of those actioned) being implemented, and 206 regularly taken medicines (19.7 % of all regular medicines) deprescribed. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a patient-centred medicine review discharge service resulted in patient-reported reduction in potentially inappropriate medicine use and hospital funding of this service. This study was registered retrospectively on 12th July 2022 with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21156862, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN21156862 .

Medicine and supplement use in infants, children, and adolescents depends on sex, age, and socioeconomic status: results of a German longitudinal population-based cohort study (LIFE Child).

Children and adolescents are exposed to medicines and supplements, but only a few studies have evaluated the actual intake in routine care. Thus, we performed a pharmacoepidemiological evaluation of a longitudinal population-based pediatric cohort study (LIFE Child) conducted at the University Hospital of Leipzig between 2014 and 2019. We analyzed all visits of the participants of the LIFE Child cohort between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019. Participants were asked to bring their medicines and supplements to their appointments at the study center. If they had not brought the preparations with them, attempts were made to obtain the relevant information during a telephone call after the visit to the study center. Furthermore, the participants and their parents were interviewed on medicine and supplement use and on sociodemographic and socioeconomic data during their visit to the study center. Associations of medicine and supplement use with age, sex, and socioeconomic status were analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regressions to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Furthermore, the number of the respective visit was included as possible confounder in the multivariate model. We included 3602 participants who visited the study center 11,906 times. The intake of 9759 medicines and supplements was recorded. Based on the evaluation of all study visits, 49% of the children and adolescents took at least one medicine or supplement. Self-medication accounted for 28% of the medicines and supplements. The prevalence of overall intake increased from 45% in 2014 to 53% in 2019 (aOR 2.63, 95% CI 2.23, 3.09). The prevalence was the highest (77%) in children aged 0- < 3 years, owing mainly to vitamin D. The prevalence of medicine use was higher in females (40%; aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10, 1.28) than in males (35%), owing mainly to the intake of ibuprofen and hormonal contraceptives in adolescent females. A high socioeconomic status was a predictor of lower medicine (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68, 0.95) and higher supplement (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09, 1.98) use. CONCLUSION: Half of all children and adolescents took at least one medicine or supplement. The intake varied depending on age and sex. Furthermore, high socioeconomic status was associated with a decreased probability of medicine intake. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Half of all children and adolescents in Germany are exposed to medicines and supplements. • Data on the actual intake are scarce as most studies focus on prescribed medicines. WHAT IS NEW: • The prevalence of medicine/supplement use rose from 2014 (45%) to 2019 (53%). The prevalence was age-dependent: it was the highest in children aged < 3 years, and the lowest in children aged 6-< 9 years. Females took medicines more frequently than males. • High socioeconomic status was associated with lower medicine and higher supplement use. Self-medication accounted for 28% of all preparations.

Determining antenatal medicine exposures in South African women: a comparison of three methods of ascertainment.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of clinical trials, data on the safety of medicine exposures in pregnancy are dependent on observational studies conducted after the agent has been licensed for use. This requires an accurate history of antenatal medicine use to determine potential risks. Medication use is commonly determined by self-report, clinician records, and electronic pharmacy data; different data sources may be more informative for different types of medication and resources may differ by setting. We compared three methods to determine antenatal medicine use (self-report, clinician records and electronic pharmacy dispensing records [EDR]) in women attending antenatal care at a primary care facility in Cape Town, South Africa in a setting with high HIV prevalence. METHODS: Structured, interview-administered questionnaires recorded self-reported medicine use. Data were collected from clinician records and EDR on the same participants. We determined agreement between these data sources using Cohen's kappa and, lacking a gold standard, used Latent Class Analysis to estimate sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for each data source. RESULTS: Between 55% and 89% of 967 women had any medicine use documented depending on the data source (median number of medicines/participant = 5 [IQR 3-6]). Agreement between the datasets was poor regardless of class except for antiretroviral therapy (ART; kappa 0.6-0.71). Overall, agreement was better between the EDR and self-report than with either dataset and the clinician records. Sensitivity and PPV were higher for self-report and the EDR and were similar for the two. Self-report was the best source for over-the-counter, traditional and complementary medicines; clinician records for vaccines and supplements; and EDR for chronic medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Medicine use in pregnancy was common and no single data source included all the medicines used. ART was the most consistently reported across all three datasets but otherwise agreement between them was poor and dependent on class. Using a single data collection method will under-estimate medicine use in pregnancy and the choice of data source should be guided by the class of the agents being investigated.

Loneliness, subjective health complaints, and medicine use among Finnish adolescents 2006-2018.

AIMS: Loneliness is an important public health challenge for all ages. This study reports time trends of loneliness among adolescents over a 12-year period and analyses the strength of the associations between loneliness, health complaints, and medicine use. METHODS: Data were derived from the cross-sectional Finnish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study conducted in 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018. The study population is based on a random sample of schools with 20,444 participants aged 11-15 years. The trends were analysed with a Mantel-Haenszel test, and the strength of the associations was evaluated by mixed-effects logistic and linear regressions. RESULTS: An increasing prevalence in frequent loneliness (2006: 11%; 2018: 15%) was evident over the 12-year study period, especially in girls and 15-year-olds. Among all adolescents, loneliness was associated with a higher risk of recurrent health complaints and medicine use to treat the corresponding health issues, especially nervousness (odds ratio 5.8) and sleeping difficulties (odds ratio 7.6). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescence is a period of higher risk of frequent loneliness and associated health complaints. In this study, loneliness was common among adolescence and an increasing trend of loneliness was observed between 2006 and 2018. Also, psychosomatic health complaints and medicine use were strongly associated with loneliness. Persistent loneliness is a significant health risk and failure to resolve loneliness before entering adulthood may imply significant concerns for future well-being.

Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitional pharmaceutical care programme: Process evaluation of Medication Actions to Reduce hospital admissions through a collaboration between Community and Hospital pharmacists (MARCH).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The recently conducted Medication Actions to Reduce hospital admissions through a collaboration between Community and Hospital pharmacists (MARCH) transitional care programme, which aimed to test the effectiveness of a transitional care programme on the occurrence of ADEs post-discharge, did not show a significant effect. To clarify whether this non-significant effect was due to poor implementation or due to ineffectiveness of the intervention as such, a process evaluation was conducted. The aim of the study was to gain more insight into the implementation fidelity of MARCH. METHODS: A mixed methods design and the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity was used. For evaluation, the implementation fidelity and moderating factors of four key MARCH intervention components (teach-back, the pharmaceutical discharge letter, the post-discharge home-visit and the transitional medication review) were assessed. Quantitative data were collected during and after the intervention. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews with MARCH healthcare professionals (community pharmacists, clinical pharmacists, pharmacy assistants and pharmaceutical consultants) and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Not all key intervention components were implemented as intended. Teach-back was not always performed. Moreover, 63% of the pharmaceutical discharge letters, 35% of the post-discharge home-visits and 44% of the transitional medication reviews were not conducted within their planned time frames. Training sessions, structured manuals and protocols with detailed descriptions facilitated implementation. Intervention complexity, time constraints and the multidisciplinary coordination were identified as barriers for the implementation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Overall, the implementation fidelity was considered to be moderate. Not all key intervention components were carried out as planned. Therefore, the non-significant results of the MARCH programme on ADEs may at least partly be explained by poor implementation of the programme. To successfully implement transitional care programmes, healthcare professionals require full integration of these programmes in the standard work-flow including IT improvements as well as compensation for the time investment.

A comprehensive approach to complementary and alternative medicine usage among patients from a vascular department.

INTRODUCTION: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies had been described in patients with disabling, chronic and painful conditions; these characteristics define the majority of vascular surgery (VS) entities. A lack of disclosure about CAM use from patients has been universally cited and may impact effective patient-doctor communication. Our primary objective was to describe CAM use, modalities, perceived benefits, safety, and associated factors among adult patients attending a VS outpatient clinic; we additionally explored patient's attitudes about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon. METHODS: This cross-sectional study invited 223 consecutive outpatients to an interview where the ICAM-Q (International Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire) and the PDRQ-9 (Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 items) were applied. In addition, sociodemographics, vascular disease and treatment-related information, comorbidity, and disease severity characteristics were obtained. Appropriated statistics was used; multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated to CAM use. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: Patients recruited were primary females (69%) and had a median age of 65 years (54-75). Most frequent vascular diagnoses were chronic venous insufficiency (36.2%) and peripheral artery disease (26%). There were 104 (46.6%) patients who referred CAM use, primarily self-helped practices (96%), and use of herbal, vitamins, or homeopathic medicines (23.7%). Overall, the majority of the patients perceived CAM modalities helpful and 94.6% denied any adverse event. Female sex (OR: 1.768, 95% CI: 0.997-3.135, p = 0.051) and hospitalization during the previous year (OR: 3.173, 95% CI: 1.492-6.748, p = 0.003) were associated to CAM use. The majority of the patients (77%) agreed about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon; meanwhile, among CAM users, up to 54.9% did not disclose it, and their main reasons were "Doctor didn't ask" (32%) and "I consider it unnecessary" (16%). The patient-doctor relationship was rated by the patients with high scores. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is frequent and perceived as safe and beneficial among VS outpatients; nonetheless, patients do not disclose CAM use with their primary vascular surgeons, and a wide range of reasons are given by the patients that prevent effective and open communication.

A qualitative study exploring the lived experience of medication use in different disease states: Linking experiences of disease symptoms to medication adherence.

WHAT IS KNOWN: Medication non-adherence leads to negative health outcomes. Medication adherence is predicted if patients understand the necessity of medication use to control disease symptoms and progression. It could be expected then, that patients with diseases with symptoms which are managed with medications, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder or gout, or diseases with high-mortality rates, such as cancer, would have higher adherence rates than asymptomatic diseases, such as hypertension. However, poor medication adherence remains problematic in both symptomatic and asymptomatic diseases. Further work is needed to explore patient experiences of medication adherence to understand the link between adherence and symptom control. OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' lived experiences of medication adherence. METHODS: Participants were recruited from community pharmacies and general practices. Forty-one semi-structured interviews and three focus groups were used to collect data from patients with disease states that had different symptomatic and asymptomatic profiles. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key parts of the experience of using medications. RESULTS: Participants reported similar experiences of medication adherence despite having different disease symptoms. Participants said that they used medications because it was an expected part of everyday life and that medications 'must be needed' because they had been supplied, rather than being used for a particular symptom. Participants reported short-term episodes of non-adherence were unlikely to lead to negative health outcomes but may result in negative social consequences. DISCUSSION: The findings broaden our understanding of patient experiences of medication use by indicating patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic diseases share similar experiences of medication use. The necessity to use medications appeared to come from 'the system' of healthcare professionals, family and friends that supply and recommend medications. WHAT IS NEW: There were key similarities in experiences of medication adherence in patients with different disease states. The negative consequences of short-term episodes of non-adherence were normalized by healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic diseases share similar experiences of medication adherence.

Analysis of the potential inappropriate use of medications in pediatric outpatients in China.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of medications is essential in children. Yet, detailed information on how drugs are being prescribed and dispensed to pediatric populations is not documented in China. AIM: The study objective was to analyze the details of medicine use and categorize the types of inappropriate use of medications on children. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on the prescriptions of pediatric outpatients aged < 18 years from 2019 to 2020 at a major Chinese tertiary academic center. Each age group's demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and the ratios of inappropriate prescriptions were analyzed. RESULTS: The total number of pediatric outpatients was 652,152, and 49.37% (322000) were prescribed medications, in which the most widely used medicines were respiratory, anti-infectives, and Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs). The prevalence rate of inappropriate prescriptions reached 20.49%, and in 2019 it was higher (21.71%) than that in 2020 (18.36%). The top three common inappropriate categories were indication-related off-label drug use, improper administration frequency, and overdosing, accounting for 67.93, 17.80 and 11.06% of all inappropriate prescriptions, respectively. The inappropriate prescriptions were more likely seen in patients aged 2-5 years and respiratory medicines. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that inappropriate drug use in pediatric outpatients is still common, and great attention needs to be paid. More prospective trials are required to identify the effectiveness, safety, and necessity of off-label drug use of medicines in children.

A snapshot of the global policies and practices of medicine use reviews by community pharmacist in chronic diseases: A narrative review.

Medicine use review is a tool to improve medication adherence and safety. Current narrative review was planned to explore global policies and practices of medicine use review by community pharmacists in chronic diseases and its impact and way forward for low- and middle-income countries. Key words, such as ″medicine use review″, ″medication therapy management″ and ″community pharmacy″ were used for search on PubMed and CINAHL databases for articles published from 2004 to 2019. Medicine use review has opened an avenue of ongoing collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners. High-income countries have witnessed a gradual yet cautious adoption of these services through effective policy shift. In terms of practices and impact, the situation in high-income countries was promising where on an average ″type-II″ medicine use review was widely in practice and had improved clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes in chronic disease. However, in low- and middle-income countries, a paucity of effective policies was noted. Nevertheless, an emergent recognition of the potential of community pharmacists to contribute to the management of chronic diseases was evident.

Influence of Consanguinity and Medication on the Development of Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. The disease is more prevalent in aged individuals compared to young ones. AIM: The present study aimed to investigate the factors associated with PD in the population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. METHODS: In this study, the questionnaire was filled from 600 PD patients, which include 54 familial cases, and 1,200 control subjects. To study the risk of PD in familial cases, questionnaires were also filled from the cases and controls. RESULTS: This study revealed that depression symptomology is common in PD patients. Moreover, the risk of PD was higher in patients with consanguineous marriages compare to controls (OR = 3.96, 95% Cl = 1.98-7.89). The first-degree relatives (59.3%) of PD patients are more likely to develop PD compared to a second- (29.5%) or third-degree (11.1%) relatives. Furthermore, the risk of PD is higher in individuals whose parents get married to first-cousin (OR: 4.76, 95% Cl: 1.81-12.5) than second- (OR: 1.34, 95% Cl: 0.54-3.32) or third-cousin marriages (OR = 0.18, 95% Cl: 0.06-0.49). Moreover, the use of paracetamol (OR: 0.39; 95% Cl: 0.25-0.59) and ibuprofen (OR: 0.35; 95% Cl: 0.17-0.70) were higher in control subjects. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that consanguineous marriages and first-degree relation with PD patients increase the risk of PD, while the use of certain medications may decrease the risk of PD. Further study is warranted in a population of Pakistan.

Off-label use of medicines in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents: a joint policy statement by the European Academy of Paediatrics and the European society for Developmental Perinatal and Pediatric Pharmacology.

Health-care professionals who prescribe medicines have the professional duty to choose medicines that are in the best interest of their individual patient, irrespective if that patient is an adult or a child. However, the availability of medicines with an appropriate label for pediatric use is lagging behind those for adults, and even available pediatric drugs are sometimes not suitable to administer to children. Consequently, health-care professionals often have no other option than to prescribe off-label medicines to children. An important reason for use of off-label medicines is to improve access to (innovative) treatments or to address medical needs and preferences of patients, especially when no other options are available. However, off-label use of medicines is in general not supported by the same level of evidence as medicines licensed for pediatric use. This may result in increased uncertainty on efficacy as well as the risk for toxicity and other side effects. In addition, liability may also be of concern, counterbalanced by professional guidelines.Conclusion: The purpose of this joint EAP/ESDPPP policy statement is to offer guidance for HCPs on when and how to prescribe off-label medicines to children and to provide recommendations for future European policy.

Socieconomic status and psychotropic medicine use during pregnancy: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada.

Women at the lower end of the socioeconomic distribution have higher rates of depression in pregnancy and lower rates of treatment. In this study, we investigate relationships between income and the use of psychotropic mediciness in pregnancy. This retrospective cohort study using population-based administrative datasets included all women who delivered a live infant in the province of British Columbia, Canada (population of 4.6 million), between April 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. We compared the socioeconomic distribution in use of psychotropic mediciness in pregnancy. We included 305,984 deliveries among 217,721 women. Women at the low end of the income distribution were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis for all mental health conditions, except anxiety, which was more common in women of highest socioeconomic status. The adjusted odds ratios for psychotropic medicine use indicate that women in the lowest income quintile have lower odds of filling a prescription for a psychotropic medicine after controlling for covariates and diagnoses of mental health conditions. However, they were more likely to fill a prescription for an antipsychotic and were more likely to fill psychotropic medicines from three or more different drug categories during pregnancy. Our findings suggest that women of lower socioeconomic status are less likely to fill a prescription for a psychotropic medicine in pregnancy, a finding largely driven by their decreased likelihood of filling an antidepressant. This is despite overall higher rates of mental illness among women of lower socioeconomic status, suggesting a gap in treatment by socioeconomic status.

Dosing inaccuracy with enteral use of ENFit ® low-dose tip syringes: The risk beyond oral adapters.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: As the global adoption of ENFit-compatible syringes becomes more widespread, it is important for syringe users to understand the risk of dosing inaccuracy for both the oral and enteral routes of use. Describing the risk of dosing inaccuracy specifically related to route of use is important to the end users' understanding of the clinical impact of device changes. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of female design ENFit low dose tip (LDT) syringes when used for enteral medication administration to the syringe performance during oral administration conditions. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective study conducted at the University of Florida Health Shands Hospital in conjunction with the University of Florida College of Pharmacy. Dosing variance (DV) up to 10% for low-risk medications and DV up to 5% is the target for high-risk medication administration is considered acceptable. The primary outcome was the frequency of administration volumes exceeding 10% of the expected amount when using the ENFit LDT syringe for both oral and enteral medication administration. Secondarily, the performance of standard ENFit syringes and the frequencies of DV exceeding 5 and 10% were also evaluated in the same conditions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 264 tests were evaluated (ENFit LDT, n = 210; ENFit standard tip, n = 54). Using the LDT syringe for the enteral route resulted in statistically significant higher rates of unacceptable dosing variance >10% when compared to the oral application (26.9% vs 12.9%, P = .01). The frequency of LDT syringe DV >5% was significantly greater than >10% variance, regardless of oral or enteral use. Standard ENFit syringes had overall fewer tests with unacceptable dosing variance and showed no difference in performance between applications. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: This study raises additional clinical concerns specifically related to the enteral use of ENFit LDT syringes within commonly accepted dosing variance ranges. Enteral and oral application of LDT syringes yield unacceptably high rates of dosing variance for high risk medications with narrow therapeutic index.

Development and validation of a mathematical model to quantify antibiotic consumption in paediatric population: A hospital-based pilot study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: A standard drug classification system and a fundamental measurement unit of drug consumption are prerequisites in a healthcare information system for generating quality data on drug use. Globally, the ATC/DDD (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification/Defined Daily Dose) system recommended by WHO is accepted as the international standard. However, owing to variability in body weight, it cannot be used directly in paediatric population. In our work, we aimed to develop a standard method of quantification of antibiotic consumption in paediatric population using a modified approach of the ATC/DDD system. METHOD: We developed a mathematical model in a simulated paediatric cohort (n = 1000) and calculated antibiotic consumption in units of days of therapy (DOT) and DDD/100 patient days (PD). We validated the model in an observational cohort (n = 38) of inpatients admitted in Paediatric Department of a tertiary care centre. RESULTS: Model simulation showed near perfect positive correlation (R = .99-1.00) between DOT and DDD/100 PD in discrete weight based sub-cohorts (weight 1-10 kg). In the validation cohort, consumption of antibiotics was 121.76 and 33.16 in terms of DOT and DDD/100 PD respectively. Strong positive correlation between the two units (R = .73) was obtained. The correlation was better in predefined age and weight categories as compared to the uncategorised consumption (R = .78-.97). The model was proved validated when weight specific (in sub-cohorts of patients weighing 4, 5, 7 kg) DDD/100 PD and DOT also showed near perfect positive correlation (R = .96-.99). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Weight specific DDD/100 PD can be explored further as a tool to standardise the quantification and comparison of consumption of drugs in paediatric population.

The attitudes and practice strategies of community pharmacists towards drug misuse management: A scoping review.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Community pharmacists have a key role to play in addressing drug misuse. The objective of this research was to systematically review the current evidence and investigate the attitudes and practice strategies of community pharmacists towards drug misuse management. METHODS: Data were extracted from 19 studies retrieved via a three-step search strategy using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The attitudes and practice strategies of pharmacists towards drug misuse management and relevance to years of practice experience were discussed in seven of the 19 studies. Pharmacists reported gaps in knowledge and insufficient education and training on drug misuse-related topics. Barriers to the effective management of drug misuse included lack of time and staff training. The most commonly reported strategy to address drug misuse was referral back to the doctor. Eight of the studies identified the benefits of real-time prescription monitoring systems. Pharmacists have a key role to play in addressing drug misuse. Opportunities exist in the development of new and innovative approaches for harm minimization led by pharmacists, and in the examination and evaluation of the pharmacists' role in referral services, interventions and screening. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: It is important to consider the role and contribution of early career pharmacists in the delivery of primary health care. They are the future of the pharmacy profession; therefore, it is critical that they are sufficiently trained and provided with the necessary resources to ensure high quality care in the management of drug misuse.

A systematic review of the impact of outpatient clinical pharmacy services on medication-related outcomes in patients receiving anticancer therapies.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving anticancer therapies are frequently prescribed complex and high-risk medication regimens, which at times can result in medication misadventures. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of outpatient clinical pharmacy services on medication-related outcomes in patients receiving anticancer therapies, including patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: A systematic review of original publications indexed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library from June 2007 to June 2017. Eligible studies evaluated outpatient pharmacy clinic services for cancer patients and reported at least one medication-related quantitative outcome measure. Two authors independently reviewed full-text articles for inclusion, then extracted data and performed quality and risk of bias assessments. RESULTS: Of 908 identified publications, 13 met predefined eligibility criteria; 1 randomised control trial, 2 controlled cohort studies and 10 uncontrolled before-after studies. Many excluded studies described outpatient pharmacy services but lacked medication-related outcomes. All included studies had informative practice model designs, with interventions for drug-related problems including drug dose optimisation ( n = 8), reduced drug interaction ( n = 6) and adverse drug reaction reporting ( n = 3). Most studies ( n = 11) reported on symptom improvement, commonly nausea ( n = 7) and pain ( n = 5). Of four studies in radiotherapy cohorts, pharmacist involvement was associated with improved symptoms, satisfaction and wellbeing scores. CONCLUSION: Few studies have objectively assessed outpatient pharmacy cancer services, even fewer in the radiotherapy settings. Although the results support these services, significant heterogeneity and bias in the study designs prohibit robust conclusions and further controlled trials are required.

Female low dose tip syringes-increased complexity of use may compromise dosing accuracy in paediatric patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) created enteral device specifications to reduce tubing misconnections. The Global Enteral Device Supplier Association (GEDSA) supports a female design: standard and low dose tip (LDT). Concerns include increased complexity of use with adapters, dosing accuracy and workflow. No peer-reviewed studies have evaluated dosing accuracy of the complete female system with adapters. The objective of this study was to compare dosing accuracy of the female design to legacy syringes. METHODS: An in vitro study was conducted at the University of Florida College of Pharmacy pharmaceutics laboratory. Assessments were completed for syringe size, dispense methods and volumes, and adapters when applicable. A gravimetric scale and specific gravity were used to calculate administration volumes. The primary outcome was frequency administration volume exceeded 10% expected amount. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 576 tests were performed. The LDT resulted in significantly higher rates of unacceptable dosing variance compared to legacy (21.2% vs 7.4%, P = 0.003). Variance exceeding 10% occurred more frequently with LDT 0.5 and 1 mL syringes, medication cup dispensing (liquid or tablet) and inappropriate LDT adapter use. Unapproved adapter processes compared to FDA-approved processes held a higher likelihood of unacceptable dosing variance (28% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001). FDA-approved use of adapters with prefilled syringes compared to bedside administration may result in higher rates of dosing inaccuracy (18.8% vs 5.6%, P = 0.06). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: This study raises clinical concerns of dosing inaccuracies with the LDT syringes, particularly with 0.5 and 1 mL sizes. The use of adapters significantly increases the opportunity for inaccurate dosing.