MITF-the first 25 years.

All transcription factors are equal, but some are more equal than others. In the 25 yr since the gene encoding the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) was first isolated, MITF has emerged as a key coordinator of many aspects of melanocyte and melanoma biology. Like all transcription factors, MITF binds to specific DNA sequences and up-regulates or down-regulates its target genes. What marks MITF as being remarkable among its peers is the sheer range of biological processes that it appears to coordinate. These include cell survival, differentiation, proliferation, invasion, senescence, metabolism, and DNA damage repair. In this article we present our current understanding of MITF's role and regulation in development and disease, as well as those of the MITF-related factors TFEB and TFE3, and highlight key areas where our knowledge of MITF regulation and function is limited.

Immune Checkpoint Therapy Combinations in Adult Advanced MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: There remains a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) combinations ± vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy (TT) in translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with advanced tRCC treated with ICT combinations at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only cases with confirmed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were included. Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST, and overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: There were 29 patients identified with median age of 38 (21-70) years, and F:M ratio 0.9:1. FISH revealed TFE3 and TFEB translocations in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT were used in 18 and 11 patients, respectively. Seventeen (59%) patients received ICT combinations as first-line therapy. ORR was 1/18 (5.5%) for dual ICT and 4/11 (36%) for ICT + VEGF TT. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median PFS was 2.8 and 5.4 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. Median OS from metastatic disease was 17.8 and 30.7 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of advanced tRCC, limited response and survival were seen after frontline dual ICT combination therapy, while ICT + VEGF TT therapy offered some efficacy. Due to the heterogeneity of tRCC, insights into the biological underpinnings are necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Efficacy of Cabozantinib in Metastatic MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC) is a rare and aggressive subgroup of renal cell carcinoma harboring high expression of c-MET. While TRCC response rates to VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors are limited, efficacy of cabozantinib (a VEGFR, MET, and AXL inhibitor) in this subgroup is unclear. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, international cohort study of patients with TRCC treated with cabozantinib. The main objectives were to estimate response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with metastatic TRCC treated in the participating centers and evaluable for response were included. Median age at metastatic diagnosis was 40 years (IQR 28.5-53). Patients' IMDC risk groups at diagnosis were favorable (9/52), intermediate (35/52), and poor (8/52). Eleven (21.2%) patients received cabozantinib as frontline therapy, 15 (28.8%) at second line, and 26 (50%) at third line and beyond. The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was 17.3%, including 2 complete responses and 7 partial responses. For 26 (50%) patients, stable disease was the best response. With a median follow-up of 25.1 months (IQR 12.6-39), median PFS was 6.8 months (95%CI 4.6-16.3) and median OS was 18.3 months (95%CI 17.0-30.6). No difference of response was identified according to fusion transcript features. CONCLUSION: This real-world study provides evidence of the activity of cabozantinib in TRCC, with more durable responses than those observed historically with other VEGFR-TKIs or ICIs.

Gene fusion analysis in renal cell carcinoma by FusionPlex RNA-sequencing and correlations of molecular findings with clinicopathological features.

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) affects younger patients and often presents as advanced disease. Accurate diagnosis is required to guide clinical management. Here we evaluate the RNA-sequencing FusionPlex platform with a 115-gene panel including TFE3 and TFEB for tRCC diagnosis and correlate molecular findings with clinicopathological features. We reviewed 996 consecutive RCC cases from our institution over the preceding 7 years and retrieved 17 cases with histological and immunohistochemical features highly suggestive of either TFE3 (n = 16) or TFEB (n = 1). Moderate to strong labeling for TFE3 was present in 15 cases; two cases with weak TFE3 expression were melan-A or cathepsin-K positive. RNA-sequencing detected gene rearrangements in eight cases: PRCC-TFE3 (3), ASPSCR1-TFE3 (2), LUC7L3-TFE3 (1), SFPQ-TFE3 (1), and a novel SETD1B-TFE3 (1). FISH assays of 11 tumors verified six positive cases concordant with FusionPlex analysis results. Two other cases were confirmed by RT-PCR. FusionPlex was superior to FISH by providing precise breakpoints for tRCC-related genes in a single assay and allowing identification of both known and novel fusion partners, thereby facilitating clinicopathological correlations as fusion partners can influence tumor appearance, immunophenotype, and behavior. Cases with partner genes PRCC and novel partner SETD1B were associated with prominent papillary architecture while cases with partner genes ASPSCR1 and LUC7L3 were associated with a predominantly nested/alveolar pattern. The case with SFPQ-TFE3 fusion was characterized by biphasic morphology mimicking TFEB-like translocation RCC. We recommend FusionPlex analysis of RCC in patients under age 50 or when the histologic appearance suggests tRCC.

Translational control mechanisms in cutaneous malignant melanoma: the role of eIF2α.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma cells develop adaptive responses in order to cope with particular conditions of tumor microenvironment, characterized by stress conditions and deregulated proliferation. Recently, the interplay between the stress response and the gene expression programs leading to metastatic spread has been reported. METHODS: We evaluated levels and localization of eIF2α/peIF2α in V600BRAF and wtBRAF metastatic melanoma cell lines by means of western blot and confocal microscopy analyses. Furthermore, we performed a sequence analyses and structure and dynamics studies of eIF2α protein to reveal the role of eIF2α and its correlations in different pathways involved in the invasive phase of melanoma. RESULTS: We found peIF2α both in cytoplasm and nucleus. Nuclear localization was more represented in V600BRAF melanoma cell lines. Our studies on eIF2α protein sequence indicated the presence of a predicted bipartite NLS as well as a nuclear export signal NES and an S1 domain, typical of RNA interacting proteins. Furthermore, we found high levels of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a component of the MiT/TFE family, and low ß-catenin levels in V600BRAF cells. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we suggest that peIF2α nuclear localization can be crucial in ER stress response and in driving the metastatic spread of melanoma, through lysosomal signaling and Wnt/ß-catenin pathway. In conclusion, this is the first evidence of nuclear localization of peIF2α, representing a possible target for future therapeutic approaches for metastatic melanoma.

TFEB at a glance.

The transcription factor EB (TFEB) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of basic cellular processes, such as lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy. The subcellular localization and activity of TFEB are regulated by mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated phosphorylation, which occurs at the lysosomal surface. Phosphorylated TFEB is retained in the cytoplasm, whereas dephosphorylated TFEB translocates to the nucleus to induce the transcription of target genes. Thus, a lysosome-to-nucleus signaling pathway regulates cellular energy metabolism through TFEB. Recently, in vivo studies have revealed that TFEB is also involved in physiological processes, such as lipid catabolism. TFEB has attracted a lot of attention owing to its ability to induce the intracellular clearance of pathogenic factors in a variety of murine models of disease, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, suggesting that novel therapeutic strategies could be based on the modulation of TFEB activity. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and accompanying poster, we present an overview of the latest research on TFEB function and its implication in human diseases.

Novel gene fusion of PRCC-MITF defines a new member of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological analysis and detection of the gene fusion by RNA sequencing and FISH.

AIMS: MITF, TFE3, TFEB and TFEC belong to the same microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family (MiT). Two transcription factors in this family have been identified in two unusual types of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Xp11 translocation RCC harbouring TFE3 gene fusions and t(6;11) RCC harbouring a MALAT1-TFEB gene fusion. The 2016 World Health Organisation classification of renal neoplasia grouped these two neoplasms together under the category of MiT family translocation RCC. RCCs associated with the other two MiT family members, MITF and TFEC, have rarely been reported. Herein, we identify a case of MITF translocation RCC with the novel PRCC-MITF gene fusion by RNA sequencing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Histological examination of the present tumour showed typical features of MiT family translocation RCCs, overlapping with Xp11 translocation RCC and t(6;11) RCC. However, this tumour showed negative results in TFE3 and TFEB immunochemistry and split fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) assays. The other MiT family members, MITF and TFEC, were tested further immunochemically and also showed negative results. RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed the presence of a PRCC-MITF gene fusion: a fusion of PRCC exon 5 to MITF exon 4. We then developed FISH assays covering MITF break-apart probes and PRCC-MITF fusion probes to detect the MITF gene rearrangement. CONCLUSIONS: This study both proves the recurring existence of MITF translocation RCC and expands the genotype spectrum of MiT family translocation RCCs.

Targeted therapies in children with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): An International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG)-related retrospective descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a very rare pediatric renal tumor. Robust evidence to guide treatment is lacking and knowledge on targeted therapies and immunotherapy is mainly based on adult studies. Currently, the International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) 2016 UMBRELLA protocol recommends sunitinib for metastatic or unresectable RCC. METHODS: This retrospective study describes the effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-(L)1) monoclonal antibodies, and immunotherapeutic regimens in advanced-stage and relapsed pediatric RCC. RESULTS: Of the 31 identified patients (0-18 years) with histologically proven RCC, 3/31 presented with TNM stage I/II, 8/31 with TNM stage III, and 20/31 with TNM stage IV at diagnosis. The majority were diagnosed with translocation type RCC (MiT-RCC) (21/31) and the remaining patients mainly presented with papillary or clear-cell RCC. Treatment in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, or upon relapse or progression, included mono- or combination therapy with a large variety of drugs, illustrating center specific choices in most patients. Sunitinib was often administered as first choice and predominantly resulted in stable disease (53%). Other frequently used drugs included axitinib, cabozantinib, sorafenib, and nivolumab; however, no treatment seemed more promising than sunitinib. Overall, 15/31 patients died of disease, 12/31 are alive with active disease, and only four patients had a complete response. The sample size and heterogeneity of this cohort only allowed descriptive statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of a unique series of clinical and treatment characteristics of pediatric patients with RCC treated with targeted therapies.

Pregnant patient with Xp11.2/transcription factor E3 translocation renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas (tRCCs) primarily include Xp11.2/transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene fusion-associated renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) and t(6;11)/TFEB gene fusion-associated RCC. Clinical cases of these carcinomas are rare. Fluorescence in situ hybridization can be used to identify the type, but there are no standard diagnostic and treatment methods available, and the prognosis remains controversial. Herein, we present a case of a patient with Xp11.2 tRCC at 29 weeks of gestation. The baby was successfully delivered, and radical surgery was performed for renal cancer at the same time. This is a unique and extremely rare case. We have described the case and performed a literature review to report the progress of current research on the treatment and prognosis of pregnant patients with Xp11.2/TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma. This study aims to contribute to improving the diagnosis and treatment of Xp11.2 tRCC in pregnant patients.

"Papillary Adenoma-like" Renal Tumor with TFE3 Gene Rearrangement, A Potential Precursor to or Early Event in the Development of TFE3 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas harbor gene fusion involving members of MiT family of transcription factors. Their precursor lesions have not been identified. Herein, we report the first case of small papillary tumors morphologically resembling papillary adenomas but harboring TFE3 gene alteration. The patient was a 23-year old man with multiple small papillary tumors in the right kidney discovered following a gunshot wound injury. These lesions were < 5 mm, well-circumscribed but not encapsulated tubulopapillary proliferation lined with a single layer of cuboidal cells with WHO/ISUP grade 1 or 2 nuclei. The tumor cells were immunoreactive to PAX8, AMACR, high molecular weight cytokeratin, and keratin 7 and negative for CD10, CA9, TTF1, and cathepsin K. Morphologically and immunohistochemically, these lesions were diagnosed as papillary adenomas. TFE3 gene rearrangement was confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using a TFE3 break-apart probe. We term these tumors "papillary adenoma-like" renal tumor with TFE3 gene rearrangement. These tumors are likely a precursor to or represent an early event in the development of TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinomas. An understanding of such tumors to translocation renal cell carcinoma progression can provide insight into the pathogenic mechanism, and ultimately aid the diagnosis and management of translocation renal cell carcinoma.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal metastasis in childhood: a case report.

RCC accounts for only 0.1%-0.3% of all kidney tumors and 2%-6% of malignant kidney tumors in children. Accounting for approximately one-third of the total number of cases in children and adolescents with RCC, Xp11.2 tRCC is the most common subtype of the MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma, which is a group of rare childhood and adult tumors, characterized by recurrent gene rearrangements of TFE3. Here we report a rare case of a 6-year-old male patient with MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (MiTF tRCC) where the patient developed retroperitoneal metastasis. The patient underwent partial nephrectomy (PN), radical nephrectomy (RN), abdominal lymph node resection, and intestinal adhesion lysis. Microscopically, we detected focal and nest clump-shaped clusters of tumor cells whose cytoplasm was bright and clear. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed tumor cells diffusely expressed TFE3, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated disruption of the TFE3 locus, confirming the diagnosis of Xp11.2 tRCC, the most common subtype of MiTF tRCC. Eventually, the patient obtained a good therapeutic result. This case can provide a good reference and guidance for pediatric urologists and oncologists to recognize and diagnose rare renal cell carcinoma in children.

Case Report: A MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma in the renal pelvis, calyces and upper ureter misdiagnosed as upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the most common urothelial malignancy in the renal pelvis or ureter. Renal pelvic carcinoma accounts for 90% of all tumours in the renal pelvis, so the mass in the renal pelvis is usually considered a UTUC. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the renal pelvis, calyces and upper ureter is extremely rare, especially MiT family translocation RCC, which makes this case even more uncommon. Case presentation: We report the case of a 54-year-old man had intermittent painless gross haematuria with occasional blood clots and urodynia for 2 years. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed an enlarged left kidney, and a soft tissue mass was seen in the renal pelvis, calyces and upper ureter. The patient's urine-based cytology was positive three times. Due to the severity of the upper ureteral lumen stenosis, we did not perform pathological biopsy during ureteroscopy. In the current case, clinical symptoms, imaging examinations, urine-based cytology, and ureteroscopy were combined to obtain a preoperative diagnosis of UTUC. Therefore, robot-assisted laparoscopic left radical nephroureterectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy were performed. Unexpectedly, the patient was pathologically diagnosed with MiT family translocation RCC after surgery. The surgery was uneventful. There was no intestinal tube injury or other complications perioperatively. The postoperative follow-up was satisfactory. Conclusion: MiT family translocation RCC in the renal pelvis, calyces and upper ureter is extremely rare, and can be easily confused with UTUC, resulting in the expansion of surgical scope. Preoperative ureteroscopy and biopsy or tumour punch biopsy should be used to obtain accurate pathology as far as possible, and the selection of correct surgical method is conducive to a good prognosis for patients.

High-throughput and targeted drug screens identify pharmacological candidates against MiT-translocation renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: MiT-Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by genomic translocations involving microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiT) family members TFE3, TFEB, or MITF. MiT-RCC represents a specific subtype of sporadic RCC that is predominantly seen in young patients and can present with heterogeneous histological features making diagnosis challenging. Moreover, the disease biology of this aggressive cancer is poorly understood and there is no accepted standard of care therapy for patients with advanced disease. Tumor-derived cell lines have been established from human TFE3-RCC providing useful models for preclinical studies. METHODS: TFE3-RCC tumor derived cell lines and their tissues of origin were characterized by IHC and gene expression analyses. An unbiased high-throughput drug screen was performed to identify novel therapeutic agents for treatment of MiT-RCC. Potential therapeutic candidates were validated in in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies. Mechanistic assays were conducted to confirm the on-target effects of drugs. RESULTS: The results of a high-throughput small molecule drug screen utilizing three TFE3-RCC tumor-derived cell lines identified five classes of agents with potential pharmacological efficacy, including inhibitors of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and several additional agents, including the transcription inhibitor Mithramycin A. Upregulation of the cell surface marker GPNMB, a specific MiT transcriptional target, was confirmed in TFE3-RCC and evaluated as a therapeutic target using the GPNMB-targeted antibody-drug conjugate CDX-011. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies demonstrated efficacy of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BGT226, Mithramycin A, and CDX-011 as potential therapeutic options for treating advanced MiT-RCC as single agents or in combination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the high-throughput drug screen and validation studies in TFE3-RCC tumor-derived cell lines have provided in vitro and in vivo preclinical data supporting the efficacy of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BGT226, the transcription inhibitor Mithramycin A, and GPNMB-targeted antibody-drug conjugate CDX-011 as potential therapeutic options for treating advanced MiT-RCC. The findings presented here should provide the basis for designing future clinical trials for patients with MiT-driven RCC.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma in an elderly male.

Translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma (t-RCC) is a relatively uncommon subtype of renal cell carcinoma characterized by recurrent gene rearrangements involving the TFE3 or TFEB loci. TFE3 and TFEB are members of the microphthalmia transcription factor (MiT) family, which regulate differentiation in melanocytes and osteoclasts. Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) associated with Xp11 translocations have gene fusions involving TFE3, which has multiple gene partners; RCCs with t(6:11) translocations have MALAT1-TFEB gene fusions. These tumors are histologically diverse, often have papillary, alveolar, and nested growth pattern with clear and eosinophilic cells and psammoma bodies and are seen commonly in children and young adults, accounting to 40% of pediatric RCCs and 1.6%-4% of adult RCCs. The mean and median patient age is 31 years. Thus, distinguishing t-RCC from its morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular mimics has important clinical implications. Directed ancillary testing is an essential aspect to t-RCC cases and may include a panel of immunohistochemical stains, such as PAX8, pancytokeratins, AMACR, CD10, and TFE-3. We, hereby report a case of TFE3 positiveXp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma in a 52-year-old male which is unusual.

t(6; 11) renal cell carcinoma. A case report successfully diagnosed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

INTRODUCTION: Definitive diagnosis of translocation renal cell carcinoma is challenging. We herein experienced a case of translocation(6;11) renal cell carcinoma, successfully diagnosed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization. CASE PRESENTATION: During the follow-up of a 21-year-old man with Crohn's disease, computed tomography revealed a 40-mm mass in the right kidney. Since imaging could not exclude malignancy, needle biopsy was performed. The histological diagnosis from the biopsy specimen was renal cell carcinoma, but histological typing had not been done adequately. A laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was then performed. Transcription factor EB immunoreactivity was positive, transcription factor EB rearrangement was shown by break apart and fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization. As a result, a definitive diagnosis of t(6; 11) renal cell carcinoma was made. There has been no recurrence for 5 years. CONCLUSION: Transcription factor EB immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization are useful diagnostic tools for renal tumors of young generation.

Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) immunohistochemical expression in the spectrum of perivascular epithelioid cell (PEC) lesions of the kidney.

Angiomyolipoma is the prototype of renal perivascular epithelioid cell (PEC) lesions whose pathogenesis is determined by mutations affecting TSC genes, with eventual deregulation of the mTOR pathway. It is well known that mTOR complex protein is involved in autophagy, and recently the role of STING in this process has been demonstrated. Based on this background, we sought to investigate STING immunohistochemical expression in a series of PEC lesions of the kidney. Fifty classic angiomyolipomas, 14 epithelioid angiomyolipomas/pure epithelioid PEComas, two angiomyolipomas with epithelial cysts (AMLEC), and two intraglomerular PEC lesions were collected. Immunostaining for STING was carried out in all cases and FISH analysis using dual colour break apart TFE3 and TFEB probes was performed in all pure epithelioid PEComas and AMLEC. Control cases including 20 normal adult kidneys, five fetal kidneys, and 30 MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas (the main differential diagnosis with epithelioid angiomyolipoma/pure epithelioid PEComa) were also immunohistochemically stained with STING. Strong and diffuse cytoplasmic expression of STING was observed in 100% of classic angiomyolipomas, AMLEC, and intraglomerular lesions, and in 79% (11/14) of epithelioid angiomyolipomas/pure epithelioid PEComas. TFE3 gene rearrangement was demonstrated in two epithelioid angiomyolipomas/pure epithelioid PEComas, both completely negative for STING. None of the MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas expressed STING. In conclusion, we demonstrate the expression of STING in almost all PEC lesions of the kidney. This result provides novel insights into the possible role of autophagy in PEC lesions of the kidney. Moreover, this finding may be useful for diagnostic purposes, particularly in distinguishing epithelioid angiomyolipoma/pure epithelioid PEComa from MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma and detecting intraglomerular PEC lesions.

6p21 translocation renal cell carcinoma: A case report.

6p21 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was newly classified in the WHO 2016 classification as a subtype of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MIT) family translocation RCC.A 42-year-old man was referred to our hospital with an asymptomatic solid mass in the right kidney identified during routine medical checkup. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 14-mm buried-type solid mass accompanied by punctate calcification. CT-guided biopsy suggested clear-cell carcinoma. He underwent robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Pathological findings revealed 6p21 translocation RCC based on diffuse nuclear immunoreactivity for TFEB and TFEB gene rearrangement in tumor cells by FISH analysis.

Systemic Therapies for the Management of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Works, What Doesn't, and What the Future Holds.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a broad term that refers to a diverse group of tumors, each with its own distinct biologic and therapeutic profile. The management of nccRCCs is often based on extrapolating data from clinical trials in the more common clear cell renal cell carcinoma, but our emerging prospective and retrospective clinical experience in nccRCC allows us to make more precise recommendations tailored to each histology. The systemic therapy options for metastatic nccRCC include targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and, for specific rare subtypes, cytotoxic chemotherapy. Each nccRCC histology may respond differently to these regimens, which makes accurate pathologic diagnosis imperative. In the present review, we discuss the available clinical and biological data that can help guide systemic therapy recommendations for specific nccRCC subtypes.

MiT Family Transcriptional Factors in Immune Cell Functions.

The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family (MiT family) proteins are evolutionarily conserved transcription factors that perform many essential biological functions. In mammals, the MiT family consists of MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor or melanocyte-inducing transcription factor), TFEB (transcription factor EB), TFE3 (transcription factor E3), and TFEC (transcription factor EC). These transcriptional factors belong to the basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) transcription factor family and bind the E-box DNA motifs in the promoter regions of target genes to enhance transcription. The best studied functions of MiT proteins include lysosome biogenesis and autophagy induction. In addition, they modulate cellular metabolism, mitochondria dynamics, and various stress responses. The control of nuclear localization via phosphorylation and dephosphorylation serves as the primary regulatory mechanism for MiT family proteins, and several kinases and phosphatases have been identified to directly determine the transcriptional activities of MiT proteins. In different immune cell types, each MiT family member is shown to play distinct or redundant roles and we expect that there is far more to learn about their functions and regulatory mechanisms in host defense and inflammatory responses.

The role of TFEB in tumor cell autophagy: Diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

Autophagy is a conserved "self-eating" recycling process which removes aggregated or misfolded proteins, or defective organelles, to maintain cellular hemostasis. In the autophagy-lysosome pathway (ALP), clearance of unwanted debris and materials occurs through the generation of the autophagosome, a complex of double-membrane bounded vesicles that form around cytosolic cargos and catabolize their contents by fusion to lysosomes. In tumors, autophagy has dichotomous functions via preventing tumor initiation but promoting tumor progression. The basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor EB (TFEB) activates the promoters of genes encoding for proteins, which participate in this cellular degradative system by regulating lysosomal biogenesis, lysosomal acidification, lysosomal exocytosis and autophagy. In humans, disturbances of ALP are related to various pathological conditions. Recently, TFEB dysregulation was found to have a crucial pathogenic role in different tumors by modulating tumor cell autophagy. Notably, in renal cell carcinomas, different TFEB gene fusions were reported to promote oncogenic features. In this review, we discuss the role of TFEB in human cancers with a special focus on potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications.