A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Comparison of the midterm result between locking plate and elastic intramedullary nail treating oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute Monteggia fracture (AMF) is defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a dislocation of the radial head, with less than 1 percent prevalence in pediatric patients with an elbow injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods for oblique ulnar fracture AMF Bado type I in children. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 28 children with oblique ulnar fracture acute Monteggia injury Bado I were included. Patients was divided into two groups: In the EIN group 16 patients were fixed with elastic intramedullary nail after reduction, and in the LCP group 12 patients were fixed with locking compression plate after reduction. Operation time and blood loss were recorded and the patients were assessed clinically by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of movement(ROM) and range of rotation(ROR). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were accessible for durable follow-up, with a mean age of 7.7 ± 1.3 years, follow up by 33.7 ± 5.1 months. The average operation time was 48.1 ± 9.2 min for the EIN group and 67.1 ± 7.2 min for the LCP group. The average blood loss was 8.2 ± 2.3 ml for the EIN group and 18.8 ± 3.8 ml for the LCP group. The average operation time and average blood loss in the EIN group are significant less than the LCP group. Mean MEPS, ROM, ROR in both group improved significantly before sugery to three months after surgery, and maintained very good results at last follow up. There is no significant difference between the EIN group and the LCP group in MEPS, ROM and ROR. CONCLUSIONS: Oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients fixed by EIN and LCP can both get good mid-term results measured by MEPS, ROM and ROR, Fixed by EIN have shorter operation time and less blood loss than fixed by LCP.

Risk factors for redislocation of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children after reconstruction surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Monteggia fracture-dislocation refers to traumatic ulnar fractures and dislocation of the radial head, which is one of the most frequently missed injuries, especially in children. The most widespread attitude towards chronic Monteggia lesion is the open reduction of the radial head associated with ulnar osteotomy with or without annular ligament reconstruction. Our study aimed to analyze the risk factors for redislocation after surgical management of chronic Monteggia lesion and the benefits of annular ligament reconstruction and radiocapitellar pinning in paediatric. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with reconstruction surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in our department between 2005 and 2017, with a minimum two years' follow-up. The reconstruction surgery included ulnar osteotomy performed in all patients, annular ligament repair or reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint, or radial osteotomy in some patients. We collected the related clinical data and evaluated the risk factors of redislocation using logistic regression analyses and a two-piecewise linear regression model with a smoothing function, after reconstruction. RESULTS: Throughout a mean six years' follow-up (range, 2-14 years), 62 patients (42 males, 20 females; average age 6.49 years range, 2-13 years) were reviewed. Of the radiocapitellar joints, 16.1% was noted to have redislocation. Univariate risk analysis showed age, time from injury to surgery, and radial osteotomy were risk factors for a recurrent radiocapitellar redislocation. Time from injury to surgery was found to be independent predictor of redislocation in multivariate analysis. However, there were significant nonlinear associations between time from injury to surgery and redislocation in multivariate logistic regression analysis after multivariate adjustment (p for nonlinear = 0.023). Every one month increase was associated with a 1.37-fold increase in redislocation, in participants within one year after injury. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the surgery of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation should be done as quickly as possible within one year after injury. Associated annular ligament reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint does not seem to be helpful.

To Angulate or Not to Angulate the Ulna during the Progressive Distraction Period Performed with a Monolateral External Fixator in Paediatric Patients with a Chronic Monteggia Fracture?

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic evolution of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixators (MEFs) with or without angulation of the ulna during the distraction period. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 20 children (14 boys and 6 girls) with CMFs. According to the strategy of ulnar lengthening, two groups of patients were identified: patients undergoing gradual lengthening with (Group A, n = 11) or without ulna angulation (Group B, n = 9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.7 years old (range, 5.4−12.9). The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 26.3 months (range, 1−96), and the mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 5.5−45.4). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kim et al.'s Elbow Performance Score, while radiographic outcomes were assessed on plain radiographs. Results: Age at surgery, sex, laterality, time between trauma and surgery, and time of follow up in the two groups of patients showed no significant differences. The radial head was successfully reduced in 9 of 9 and 10 of 11 patients in Groups B and A, respectively (p = 1.00). The mean time to achieve radial head reduction was shorter in Group B (18.1 ± 5.3 days) than in Group A (39.2 ± 18.7 days; p = 0.004). The mean angulation of the ulna at the end of treatment was significantly lower in Group B (0.6° ± 1.1°) than in Group A (25.9° ± 6.3°; p < 0.0001). The average ulnar lengthening at the end of treatment in Group B (14.1 ± 5.8 mm) was, on average, 7.7 mm less than that in Group A (21.8 ± 9.7 mm; p = 0.05). The Kim et al. Elbow Performance Score at the last follow-up visit was comparable between the two groups of patients (p = 1.00). Conclusions: A shorter time to achieve radial head reduction and less deformity of the ulna can be expected in paediatric patients with CMFs undergoing intraoperative restoration of ulnar alignment and gradual lengthening without angulation postoperatively.

The adjunct use of lateral hinged external fixator in the treatment of traumatic destabilizing elbow injuries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of using a lateral hinged external fixator as an adjunct stabilizer in the treatment of a variety of acute destabilizing elbow injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the medical records of patients in whom a lateral monolateral elbow hinged external fixator was applied by the senior author. The indication to apply the fixator corresponded to a variety of acute injury patterns ranging from simple elbow trauma or dislocation to complex fracture-dislocation, and the decision was based on either the presence of recurrent or persistent instability in any direction and/or to secure a vulnerable or weak bony fixation or soft tissue repair as intra-operatively judged by the surgeon. The fixator was inserted in the same setting after the repair of the associated ligamentous and/or bony structures. Patients operated after one month of the trauma and those presented with open elbow injury or associated humeral or ulnar shaft fracture were excluded. Rehabilitation was immediately started and the fixator removed at six to eight weeks with elbow testing and gentle manipulation under general anaesthesia, and resuming of rehabilitation after removal. Clinical assessment was performed for all patients according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) with evaluation of range of motion at regular intervals till the end of the post-operative first year, then at final follow-up for the purpose of the study with radiographic assessment for evaluation of elbow reduction and concentricity. RESULTS: There were 13 patients with a mean age of 42 years. Two patients had instability secondary to LCL rupture; one patient had redislocation because of associated coronoid process fracture; one patient had radial head fracture with rupture of both collateral ligaments; five patients had terrible triad injury with variable association of collateral ligaments lesions; and four patients had posterior Monteggia fracture-dislocation. The mean MEPS was 90 at a mean follow-up of seven years with six excellent, six good, and one fair result. All patients had a concentrically reduced and stable elbow as assessed clinically and radiologically with a mean functional arc of motion of 132° for extension-flexion and 178° for pronation-supination. CONCLUSION: The hinged elbow external fixator represents a valuable adjunct in the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of unstable elbows after bony and soft tissue repair. It provides satisfactory results in terms of stability and function and should be available in the operating room when a surgeon treats a complex elbow dislocation or fracture-dislocation.

Radial neck fracture or Monteggia equivalent lesion: delayed radial head subluxation in an adolescent and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Monteggia equivalent lesion represents a series of combined elbow and forearm injuries that resemble typical Monteggia fracture either in presentation or mechanism. The term has gradually evolved since its introduction, as sporadic case reports continued to complement it. The aim of this study was to present a furthermore type of that lesion which no previous study had reported and arouse pediatric orthopedists' additional awareness of it. CASE PRESENTATION: A 11-year-old girl, whose injury pattern initially appeared to be a mild radial neck fracture with undisplaced proximal ulnar fracture, and without radial head dislocation, was treated with closed reduction and long-arm splint immobilization. Acceptable results were acquired at first-week follow-up, yet dramatic changes turned up 2 weeks later when the dislocated radial head was found. A further reduction to the fracture and joint site only resulted in a subluxated and incongruous radiocapitellar joint on the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Then a definitive operation was performed, which involved a Boyd incision, correction of radial head tilting, opening wedge osteotomy of the proximal ulna and proper fixation respectively. And acceptable results were achieved 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: This case, with occult proximal ulna fracture, angulated radial neck fracture, subsequent radiocapitellar dislocation, and articular incongruity, was deemed as a rare Monteggia type-one equivalent fracture-dislocation variant rather than an ordinary radial neck fracture and it facilitates further understanding and management of the Monteggia fracture.

Monteggia fracture: an easy fracture to miss.

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of missed Monteggia fracture by radiologists and bedside clinicians (emergency and orthopaedic doctors) at a tertiary hospital. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and electronic medical records (EMR) between Jan 2010 and April 2019. All consecutive paediatric and adult patients who presented to the emergency department with the diagnosis of Monteggia fracture were included. The patient's emergency presentation medical notes and trauma film reports were compared. Most emergency presentations were discussed with orthopaedics; hence, this was combined as a single group (bedside clinician group). All images were blindly reviewed by a senior consultant radiologist. Results from the radiologist and bedside clinician groups were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were identified; 4 were excluded as they were not true Monteggia fracture on review. Forty-seven patients were included in the study (age range 3-70 years, mean age 15 years). Thirty-three patients (70%) were correctly diagnosed by both groups. Twelve patients (25.5%) had a missed diagnosis by the radiologist's group. Seven patients (14.9%) were missed by the bedside clinicians. Five patients (10.6%) were missed by both groups with fractures detected on re-presentations. The most commonly missed finding was a radial head dislocation/subluxation, followed by a subtle ulnar fracture (confirmed by periosteal reaction development on subsequent radiographs) and an ulnar plastic deformity. CONCLUSION: The Monteggia fracture is an important diagnosis, but it is not infrequently missed by radiologists and clinicians. Special attention to the radiocapitellar joint alignment and ulnar periosteum, and looking for a subtle ulnar fracture or plastic deformity would ensure correct diagnosis.

Clinical effect of manual reduction of humeroradial joint in the treatment of type â -â ¢ fresh Monteggia fracture in children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of closed reduction on the humeroradial joint in the treatment of Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ fresh Monteggia fractures in children and investigate the effect of clinical factors, including Bado classification, age and time of treatment on the success rate of closed reduction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the data of children ≤10 years old with fresh Monteggia fractures (injury within two weeks) treated by manual reduction with plaster immobilization from January 2014 to April 2019. All patients were followed up in the outpatient department every two weeks for 4-6 weeks until plaster removal and then 3, 6 and 12 months. Online or telephone interview was provided for some inconvenient patients after 6 months. Mackay criteria were used to evaluate the clinical effect. Radiographic data were collected and reviewed to assess the reduction of the humeroradial joint. Function of the elbow joint and forearm was evaluated and risk factors related to the failure of reduction were assessed. The successful manual reduction was analyzed from three aspects, respectively Bado fracture type (Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ), patient age (<3 year, 3-6 years, >6 years) and time interval from injury to treatment (group A, <1 day; group B, 1-3 days; group C, >3 days). RESULTS: Altogether 88 patients were employed in this study, including 58 males (65.9%) and 30 females (34.1%) aged from 1 to 10 years. There were 29 cases (33.0%) of Bado type Ⅰ Monteggia fractures, 16 (18.2%) type Ⅱ and 43 (48.7%) type Ⅲ. Successful manual reduction was achieved in 79 children (89.8%) at the last follow-up. The failed 9 patients received open surgery. Mackay criteria showed 100% good-excellent rate for all the patients. The success rate of manual reduction was 89.7%, 87.5% and 90.7% in Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases, respectively, revealing no significant differences among different Bado types (χ2 = 0.131, p = 0.937). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 13 toddlers (13/13, 100%), 38 preschool children (28/42, 90.5%) and 28 school-age children (28/33, 84.8%), suggesting no significant difference either (χ2 = 2.375, p = 0.305). However time interval from injury to treatment showed that patients treated within 3 days had a much higher rate of successful manual reduction: 67 cases (67/71, 94.4%) in group A, 10 cases (10/11, 90.9%) in group B, and 2 cases (2/6, 33.3%) in group C (χ2 = 22.464, p < 0.001). Fisher's test further showed significant differences between groups A and C (p = 0.001) and groups B and C (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Closed reduction is a safe and effective method for treating fresh Monteggia fractures in children. The reduction should be conducted as soon as possible once the diagnosis has been made.

Does overcorrection cause any negative effect on pediatric missed Monteggia lesion?

PURPOSES: To evaluate the outcome of different types of ulna osteotomy in missed Monteggia fracture with a particular interest in anatomical correction and overcorrection techniques. The outcome between the two groups were compared on aspects of (1) clinical outcome (2) radiologic outcome. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with type 1 missed Monteggia fracture who underwent surgery between January 2005-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the degrees of correction: group 1 anatomical correction (no ulnar dorsal angulation) and group 2 overcorrection (degrees of ulnar dorsal angulation ≥ 10°). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kim elbow performance score. Radiologic outcomes were categorized into four groups with regard to the radial head: excellent (complete reduction), good (slight subluxation), fair (moderate subluxation), and poor (dislocation). RESULTS: Eleven patients with anatomical ulna osteotomy and ten patients with overcorrection ulnar osteotomy were enrolled with a mean age of 7.95 (5-12) years at the time of operation. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 27.05 (3-120) months, and the mean period of follow-up was 29.90 ± 22.37 (12-84) months. The average angle of total correction measured in group 1 was 6.09° (3°-9°) and 28.37° (12°-40°), in group 2. Fair-to-poor radiological outcomes at the last follow-up were more frequently observed in overcorrection group (40% vs. 0%) (p = 0.035) as well as clinical outcome (20% vs. 0%) (p = 0.214). Among the patients in group 2, posterior dislocation was diagnosed in two patients at 18 months and 2 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: The postoperative result of overcorrection ulna osteotomy showed significant inferiority in radiologic outcome compared to anatomical correction. Overcorrection of ulna osteotomy could be associated with posterior dislocation of radial head.

Treatment of forearm diaphyseal defect by distraction compression bone transport and continued distraction for radial head reduction: A case study.

Treatment of infected forearm nonunion and defects represents a difficult task for the operating surgeons. Conventional methods like composite and vascularized fibular grafts and the induced membranes filled with cancellous autografts or the Masquelet technique have been reported to be useful and successful, but sometimes it is difficult to predict the outcome and cannot address simultaneous deformities or the need to apply gradual distraction for reduction of a chronically dislocated radial head. Ilizarov technique has an answer for such conditions. We report a 43 years old man with infected ulnar defect and dislocated radial head as a result of infected Monteggia fracture: the patient was successfully treated by Ilizarov bone transport after failed attempts by bone spacer and fibular graft.

The Adult Monteggia Fracture: Patterns and Incidence of Annular Ligament Incarceration Among 121 Cases at a Single Institution Over 19 Years.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to identify the relative frequency of Monteggia fracture patterns and to investigate the required frequency of open reduction of the proximal radiocapitellar joint. METHODS: We identified 121 Monteggia fractures at a Level I trauma center from 1996 to 2015 and included 119 in this study. These fractures were identified using a database search for the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes as well as individual surgeons' logs. Two fellowship-trained hand surgeons reviewed the identified patients' x-rays and operative notes. Each fracture was classified using Bado's original description, excluding transolecranon and Monteggia variants. RESULTS: Bado I lesion represented 68% (81 of 119) of Monteggia fractures. Annular ligament incarceration preventing radial head reduction occurred in approximately 17% (14 of 81) of this Bado type. Revision fixation of the ulna was not necessary (none of 119 cases) and functional range of motion (average arc, 117°) was recovered in most patients. The reoperation rate of 20% (23 of 119) was related to the severity of the presenting injury and hardware prominence. CONCLUSIONS: Most radial head dislocations associated with Monteggia fractures occur anteriorly and will reduce with anatomic plating of the ulna. In cases where the radial head fails to reduce, entrapment of the annular ligament can be expected and open reduction is required. Revision fixation of the ulna to achieve reduction of the radial head is uncommon in our experience. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Long-term follow-up of corrective ulnar osteotomy for missed Monteggia fractures in children.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric Monteggia fractures are relatively rare and are commonly missed. Radial head subluxation can persist with long-term consequences if these fractures are left untreated. We evaluated the long-term treatment outcomes after open reduction with ulnar osteotomy for missed Monteggia fractures during childhood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen children were included. Our objective was to assess the clinical and radiographic postoperative outcomes. We evaluated satisfaction by questionnaire. Open reduction of the radial head was performed, combined with an opening-wedge ulnar osteotomy. The mean interval between trauma and surgery was 26.9 months (range, 1-145 months). The mean length of follow-up was 132 months (range, 67-206 months). RESULTS: Only patients with a delay of more than 6 months complained of elbow tenderness. Clinical improvement (except for pronation) was obtained postoperatively, with significance found in the flexion-extension arc (P = .011). In addition, pronation loss (P = .044) and the flexion-extension arc (P = .041) improved significantly in patients with a surgical delay under 6 months compared with patients with a surgical delay of more than 6 months. Radiographically, there were 9 good and 5 fair results. We found a negative association between radiographic outcomes and both age at surgery and delay to surgery (P = .036 and P = .039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Good results can be obtained after open reduction with opening-wedge ulnar osteotomy. Lesser clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected after a surgical delay of more than 6 months. Furthermore, the radiographic outcome seems better if the patient is younger than 6 years.

[Meta analysis of surgical treatment for old Monteggia fracture in children].

Objective: To analysis the treatment effect of the ulnar osteotomy and ring-shaped ligament reconstruction for the treatment of old Monteggia fracture in children by using Meta analyze, and the difference of clinical curative effect was compared in order to provide the basis for the selection of clinical treatment options for old Monteggia fractures in children. Methods: We searched databases such as CNKI, Wanfang database, Medline, PubMed, Embase and Science through computer, at the same time, the references of relevant documents were retrieved manually, and the data processing was carried out by the RevMan5.3 statistical software provided by the Cochrane cooperation network by incorporating the exclusion criteria. The results were obtained and analyzed. Results: A total of 17 standard literature, 438 cases, 224 cases of ulnar osteotomy, 214 cases with ring ligament repair and reconstruction were obtained. The operation scheme, which was mainly based on the lengthening of ulna osteotomy, was superior to the reconstruction of ring ligament reconstruction. The complications and second operation rates of the former was less than that of the latter. Conclusion: The surgical methods for the reconstruction of the ulna osteotomy and the ring-shaped ligament have advantages and disadvantages. The choice of the operative plan for the old Monteggia fracture should be based on the following factors: the time of the old Monteggia fracture formation, the degree of the ulnar and radial deformity and the familiarity of the operative method.

Forearm Instability: Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Treatment Options.

The forearm unit consists of the radius and ulna, a complex and interrelated set of joints (distal radioulnar joint, proximal radioulnar joint) and the soft tissue stabilizers between the 3 bones. Distally, this is represented by the triangular fibrocartilage complex at the wrist, proximally by the annular ligament at the elbow, and in the forearm by the interosseous membrane. Disruptions in any of these structures may lead to forearm instability, with consequences at each of the remaining structures.

Annular ligament reconstruction with the superficial head of the brachialis: surgical technique and biomechanical evaluation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform biomechanical testing of annular ligament (AL) reconstruction using the superficial head of the brachialis tendon (SHBT) as a distally based tendon graft. We hypothesized that posterior translation of the radial head following AL reconstruction with an SHBT graft does not significantly differ from intact specimens. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen elbow specimens were used. The stability of the radial head against posterior translation forces (30 N) was evaluated in 0°, 45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion. Posterior translation was obtained for the intact AL, the sectioned AL and the reconstructed AL. Cyclic loading (100 cycles) in 90° of elbow flexion was performed for the intact and the reconstructed AL. RESULTS: Posterior translation of the radial head decreased during elbow flexion in native specimens. Sectioning of the AL significantly increased instability over the full range of motion. AL reconstruction with the SHBT restored the stability of the proximal radius but-other than the native AL-was not influenced by elbow flexion. In 120° of flexion the native AL provided significantly more stability when compared to the reconstructed AL. Cyclic loading did not provide significant differences between native and reconstructed specimens. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a feasible technique for AL reconstruction using the SHBT. The biomechanical results obtained in this study confirm the efficacy of the procedure. AL reconstruction restores the stability of the proximal radius, yet it cannot fully mimic the complex features of the intact AL.

Monteggia fracture dislocations: a historical review.

The eponym Monteggia fracture dislocation originally referred to a fracture of the shaft of the ulna accompanied by anterior dislocation of the radial head that was described by Giovanni Battista Monteggia of Italy in 1814. Subsequently, a further classification system based on the direction of the radial head dislocation and associated fractures of the radius and ulna was proposed by Jose Luis Bado of Uruguay in 1958. This article investigates the evolution of treatment, classification, and outcomes of the Monteggia injury and sheds light on the lives and contributions of Monteggia and Bado.

Uncommon type 3 Monteggia equivalent lesion due to an ulnar shaft nonunion in adults: A case report.

It is uncommon to observe a nonunion of an isolated ulnar shaft fracture after surgical treatment; therefore, complications due to this nonunion are very rare. Adults are more likely to develop nonunions compared to children. We report the case of a 34-year-old man, who had a left ulnar shaft fracture, treated with a screwed plate. Four months later, a septic nonunion occurred causing a type 3 Monteggia equivalent lesion with a lateral dislocation of the radial head. We describe the consecutive methods of treatment that resulted in complete bone consolidation. The case report aims to underline the diagnostic particularities and the therapeutic challenges of this rare complication.

Metaizeau technique in stabilizing Monteggia equivalent 1b associated proximal radial physeal injury in a rural setting: a case report.

Introduction: The Monteggia equivalent type 1b fracture, consisting of an ulnar shaft fracture and radial head dislocation, is a rare condition first described by Giovanni Battista Monteggia. The Metaizeau technique, emphasizing percutaneous intramedullary fixation to preserve bone healing and prevent growth plate damage, has gained prominence in managing these fractures. Case report: A 10-year-old boy presented with left forearm pain, swelling, and deformity following a fall while playing football. X-rays revealed a proximal fourth ulnar fracture with dorsal and lateral angulation, along with a proximal radial metaphyseal fracture showing anterior rotation and physeal extension. This fracture pattern resembled a Monteggia fracture type III but differed in the lateral proximal radial disruption via a Salter-Harris type II fracture rather than radial epiphysis dislocation. Satisfactory reduction achieved for ulna was managed with standard nailing system but could not be achieved for radial physeal injury, which was managed with Metaizeau technique. Discussion: Type 1b Monteggia equivalents involving a Salter-Harris type 2 fracture of the proximal radius with an associated proximal ulnar fracture, adherence to Monteggia fracture reduction principles is vital. Closed reduction and internal fixation are preferred treatments, with the Metaizeau technique offering advantages such as minimal invasiveness and avoidance of implant-related complications. The Metaizeau technique is particularly beneficial for displaced radial neck fractures in children, providing stable fixation while preserving the fracture environment necessary for optimal healing. Conclusion: In cases of Monteggia fracture equivalents, most proximal radial fractures typically reduce to an acceptable level following ulnar reduction. However, proximal radial physeal fractures may require specific attention to achieve satisfactory reduction. The Metaizeau technique, commonly employed in the management of isolated radial neck fractures, can be utilized to achieve this reduction to an acceptable level.

A novel variant of type-II Monteggia equivalent in an adult: A case report with a 6-year follow-up.

Case: An 18-year-old right-handed male student presented after a road-traffic-accident; he had type-II Monteggia fracture dislocation associated with ipsilateral type-I capitellum fracture and comminuted lateral condyle avulsion fracture. He underwent open reduction and fixation of ulna with 3.5 DCP with autologous olecranon bone grafting and fixation of capitellum using Herbert screw along with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair using fiber wire. At 6-years follow-up good outcome was seen without functional restrictions despite 15 degrees of restriction in pronation. Conclusion: Monteggia type-II variant with type-I capitellum fracture and LCL avulsion is a unique combination that represents a novel variant of type-II Monteggia equivalent, which adds to the existing classification of Monteggia equivalents.

Ulnar osteotomy between the proximal 1/3 and 1/5 provides a stable radiocapitellar joint in chronic Monteggia fracture.

Background: The precise location of unlar osteotomy remains a subject of ongoing controversy in chronic Monteggia fracture (CMF). The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of different levels of ulnar osteotomy on redislocation in CMF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 18 children following our previous series. Except the baseline characteristics and radiographic parameters such as ulnar osteotomy angle, maximum interosseous distance (MID) and proportional ulnar length (PUL), we introduced a new parameter: proportional ulnar osteotomy (PUO) which represents the quantitative level of proximal ulnar osteotomy. Based on the value of PUO, we divided it into two intervals: appropriate PUO range (1/5< PUO <1/3) and inappropriate PUO range (PUO >1/3; PUO <1/5). The relationship between these indexes and redislocation was analyzed. Results: According to the reduction state of radial head, patients were divided in two groups: reduced (15/18) and redislocation (3/18). Only PUO range differed significantly (P=0.043) between the two groups, with a notably higher number of patients showed an osteotomy between 1/5 and 1/3 of ulna in reduced group. Combining PUO range with radiographic parameters (osteotomy angle and post-PUL) improved the accuracy and specificity over using osteotomy angle and post-PUL (accuracy, 94.44% vs. 83.33%) (specificity, 93.33% vs. 86.67%, P=0.008). This combination further enhanced the predictive capability for detecting the risk of redislocation in CMFs. Conclusions: Ulnar osteotomy between the proximal 1/3 and 1/5 appears to provide a much safer and more stable radiocapitellar joint in CMF.