Corticomotor pathway function and recovery after stroke: a look back and a way forward.

Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability that results in motor deficits and reduced independence. Regaining independence relies on motor recovery, particularly regaining function of the hand and arm. This review presents evidence from human studies that have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to identify neurophysiological mechanisms underlying upper limb motor recovery early after stroke. TMS studies undertaken at the subacute stage after stroke have identified several neurophysiological factors that can drive motor impairment, including membrane excitability, the recruitment of corticomotor neurons, and glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. However, the inherent variability and subsequent poor reliability of measures derived from motor evoked potentials (MEPs) limit the use of TMS for prognosis at the individual patient level. Currently, prediction tools that provide the most accurate information about upper limb motor outcomes for individual patients early after stroke combine clinical measures with a simple neurophysiological biomarker based on MEP presence or absence, i.e. MEP status. Here, we propose a new compositional framework to examine MEPs across several upper limb muscles within a threshold matrix. The matrix can provide a more comprehensive view of corticomotor function and recovery after stroke by quantifying the evolution of subthreshold and suprathreshold MEPs through compositional analyses. Our contention is that subthreshold responses might be the most sensitive to reduced output of corticomotor neurons, desynchronized firing of the remaining neurons, and myelination processes that occur early after stroke. Quantifying subthreshold responses might provide new insights into post-stroke neurophysiology and improve the accuracy of prediction of upper limb motor outcomes.

Modulation of motor cortex inhibition during manual dexterity tasks: an adaptive threshold hunting study.

The ability to perform intricate movements is crucial for human motor function. The neural mechanisms underlying precision and power grips are incompletely understood. Corticospinal output from M1 is thought to be modulated by GABAA-ergic intracortical networks within M1. The objective of our study was to investigate the contribution of M1 intracortical inhibition to fine motor control using adaptive threshold hunting (ATH) with paired-pulse TMS during pinch and grasp. We hypothesized that short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) could be assessed during voluntary activation and that corticomotor excitability and SICI modulation would be greater during pinch than grasp, reflecting corticospinal control. Seventeen healthy participants performed gradual pinch and grasp tasks. Using ATH, paired-pulse TMS was applied in the anterior-posterior current direction to measure MEP latencies, corticomotor excitability, and SICI. MEP latencies indicated that the procedure preferentially targeted late I-waves. In terms of corticomotor excitability, there was no difference in the TMS intensity required to reach the MEP target during pinch and grasp. Greater inhibition was found during pinch than during grasp. ATH with paired-pulse TMS permits investigation of intracortical inhibitory networks and their modulation during the performance of dexterous motor tasks revealing a greater modulation of GABAA-ergic inhibition contributing to SICI during pinch compared with grasp. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Primary motor cortex intracortical inhibition was investigated during dexterous manual task performance using adaptive threshold hunting. Motor cortex intracortical inhibition was uniquely modulated during pinching versus grasping tasks.

Short-latency afferent inhibition is reduced in people with multiple sclerosis during fatiguing muscle contractions.

Understanding how inhibitory pathways influence motor cortical activity during fatiguing contractions may provide valuable insight into mechanisms associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) muscle activation. Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) reflects inhibitory interactions between the somatosensory cortex and the motor cortex, and although SAI is typically reduced with MS, it is unknown how SAI is regulated during exercise-induced fatigue. The current study examined how SAI modulates motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during fatiguing contractions. Fourteen people with relapsing-remitting MS (39 ± 6 years, nine female) and 10 healthy individuals (36 ± 6 years, six female) participated. SAI was induced by stimulation of the median nerve that was paired with TMS over the motor representation of the abductor pollicis brevis. A contraction protocol was employed that depressed force generating capacity using a sustained 3-min 15% MVC, immediately followed by a low-intensity (15% MVC) intermittent contraction protocol so that MEP and SAI could be measured during the rest phases of each duty cycle. Similar force, electromyography and MEP responses were observed between groups. However, the MS group had significantly reduced SAI during the contraction protocol compared to the healthy control group (p < .001). Despite the MS group reporting greater scores on the Fatigue Severity Scale and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, these scales did not correlate with inhibitory measures. As there were no between-group differences in SSEPs, MS-related SAI differences during the fatiguing contractions were most likely associated with disease-related changes in central integration.

Observing an expert's action swapped with an observer's face increases corticospinal excitability during combined action observation and motor imagery.

This study aimed to examine whether observing an expert's action swapped with an observer's face increases corticospinal excitability during combined action observation and motor imagery (AOMI). Twelve young males performed motor imagery of motor tasks with different difficulties while observing the actions of an expert performer and an expert performer with a swapped face. Motor tasks included bilateral wrist dorsiflexion (EASY) and unilateral two-ball rotating motions (DIFF). During the AOMI of EASY and DIFF, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to the left primary motor cortex, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained from the extensor carpi ulnaris and first dorsal interosseous muscles of the right upper limb, respectively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed the subjective similarity of the expert performer with the swapped face in the EASY and DIFF to the participants themselves. The MEP amplitude in DIFF was larger in the observation of the expert performer with the swapped face than that of the expert performer (P = 0.012); however, the corresponding difference was not observed in EASY (P = 1.000). The relative change in the MEP amplitude from observing the action of the expert performer to that of the expert performer with the swapped face was positively correlated with VAS only in DIFF (r = 0.644, P = 0.024). These results indicate that observing the action of an expert performer with the observer's face enhances corticospinal excitability during AOMI, depending on the task difficulty and subjective similarity between the expert performer being observed and the observer.

Inducing ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials in the biceps brachii muscle in healthy humans.

To assess reticulospinal tract excitability, high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to elicit ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). However, there is no consensus on robust and valid methods for use in human studies. The present study proposes a standardized method for eliciting and analysing iMEPs in the biceps brachii. Twenty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes recorded contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) from the right and iMEPs from the left biceps brachii. A dynamic preacher curl task was used with ~15% of the subject's one-repetition maximum load. The protocol included maximal compound action potential (M-max) determination of the right biceps brachii muscle, TMS hotspot determination, and four sets of five repetitions where 100% stimulator output was delivered at an elbow angle of 110° of flexion. We normalized cMEP amplitude by M-max (% M-max) and iMEP by cMEP amplitude ratio (ICAR). Clear iMEPs above background EMG were observed in 21 subjects (88%, ICAR = .31 ± .19). Good-to-excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .795-1.000) and low bias (.01-.08 mV and .60-1.11 ms) were demonstrated when comparing two different analysis methods (i.e. fixed time-window vs. manual onset detection) to determine the cMEP and iMEP amplitude and latency, respectively. Most subjects demonstrated clear iMEPs above background EMG triggered at a pre-determined joint angle during a light-load dynamic preacher curl exercise. Similar results were obtained when comparing a single-trial manual identification of iMEP and a semi-automated time-window data analysis approach.

Effects of auricular vagus nerve stimulation and electrical earlobe stimulation on motor-evoked potential changes induced by paired associative stimulation.

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). PAS can induce long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in humans, manifested as motor-evoked potential (MEP) enhancement. We have developed a variant of PAS ("high-PAS"), which consists of high-frequency PNS and high-intensity TMS and targets spinal plasticity and promotes rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI). Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) promotes LTP-like plasticity and enhances recovery in SCI and stroke in humans and animals when combined with repetitive motor training. We combined high-PAS with simultaneous noninvasive transcutaneous auricular VNS (aVNS) to determine if aVNS enhances the extent of PAS-induced MEP amplitude increase. Sixteen healthy participants were stimulated for 20 min in four different sessions (PAS, PAS + aVNS, PAS + shamVNS, and aVNS) in a randomized single-blind setup. MEPs were measured before, immediately after, and at 30, 60, and 90 min post-stimulation. Stimulation protocols with PAS significantly potentiated MEPs (p = 0.005) when compared with aVNS (p = 0.642). Although not significant, MEP enhancement observed after PAS (43.5%) is further increased by aVNS (49.7%) and electrical earlobe stimulation (63.9%). Our aVNS setup failed to significantly enhance the effect of PAS, but sham VNS revealed a trend towards enhanced plasticity. Optimization of auricular VNS stimulation setup is required for possible tests of patients with SCI.

The relationship between corticospinal excitability and structural integrity in stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the structural integrity and functional excitability of the corticospinal tract (CST) is likely to be important in predicting motor recovery after stroke. Previous reports are inconsistent regarding a possible link between CST structure and CST function in this setting. This study aims to investigate the structure‒function relationship of the CST at the acute phase of stroke (<7 days). METHODS: We enrolled 70 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with unilateral upper extremity (UE) weakness. They underwent a multimodal assessment including clinical severity (UE Fugl Meyer at day 7 and 3 months), MRI to evaluate the CST lesion load and transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the maximum amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP). RESULTS: A cross-sectional lesion load above 87% predicted the absence of MEPs with an accuracy of 80.4%. In MEP-positive patients, the CST structure/function relationship was bimodal with a switch from a linear relationship (rho=-0.600, 95% CI -0.873; -0.039, p<0.03) for small MEP amplitudes (<0.703 mV) to a non-linear relationship for higher MEP amplitudes (p=0.72). In MEP-positive patients, recovery correlated with initial severity. In patients with a positive MEP <0.703 mV but not in patients with an MEP ≥0.703 mV, MEP amplitude was an additional independent predictor of recovery. In MEP-negative patients, we failed to identify any factor predicting recovery. CONCLUSION: This large multimodal study on the structure/function of the CST and stroke recovery proposes a paradigm change for the MEP-positive patients phenotypes and refines the nature of the link between structural integrity and neurophysiological function, with implications for study design and prognostic information.

Usefulness of Motor Evoked Potential Measurement and Analysis of Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Ischaemia from 300 Cases of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the usefulness of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for intra-operative monitoring to detect the risk of spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Risk factors for SCI in TEVAR were also analysed. METHODS: Among 330 TEVARs performed from February 2009 to October 2018, 300 patients underwent intra-operative MEP monitoring. SCI risk groups were extracted based on MEP amplitude changes using a cutoff value of 50%. When the amplitude decreased to < 50% of the pre-operative value, intra-operative mean arterial pressure (MAP) was increased by about 20 mmHg using noradrenaline, whereas MAP was usually controlled to about 80 mmHg during surgery. Other efforts were also made to increase MEP amplitude by increasing cardiac output, correcting anaemia, and finishing the surgery promptly. Based on MEP amplitude data, SCI risk groups were extracted and risk factors for SCI in TEVAR were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 283 non-SCI risk patients and 17 SCI risk patients by MEP monitoring were extracted; only 1.0% developed immediate paraplegia and none developed delayed paraplegia. Bivariable analysis showed significant differences in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis, artery of Adamkiewicz closure, and stent graft (SG) covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies. Logistic regression analysis showed hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 - 11.67; p = .037), SG covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.78; p = .034), and haemodialysis (OR 27.78, 95% CI 6.02 - 128.22; p < .001) were the most influential risk factors for SCI in TEVAR. CONCLUSION: MEPs might be a useful monitoring tool to predict SCI in TEVAR. In addition, hyperlipidaemia, SG covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies, and haemodialysis represent key risk factors for SCI during TEVAR.

Correlation of bilateral M1 hand area excitability and overall functional recovery after spinal cord injury: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: After spinal cord injury (SCI), a large number of survivors suffer from severe motor dysfunction (MD). Although the injury site is in the spinal cord, excitability significantly decreases in the primary motor cortex (M1), especially in the lower extremity (LE) area. Unfortunately, M1 LE area-targeted repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has not achieved significant motor improvement in individuals with SCI. A recent study reported that the M1 hand area in individuals with SCl contains a compositional code (the movement-coding component of neural activity) that links matching movements from the upper extremities (UE) and the LE. However, the correlation between bilateral M1 hand area excitability and overall functional recovery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the changes in the excitability of the bilateral M1 hand area after SCI and its correlation with motor recovery, we aim to specify the therapeutic parameters of rTMS for SCI motor rehabilitation. METHODS: This study is a 12-month prospective cohort study. The neurophysiological and overall functional status of the participants will be assessed. The primary outcomes included single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS. The second outcome included functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measurements. Overall functional status included total motor score, modified Ashworth scale score, ASIA Impairment Scale grade, spinal cord independence measure and modified Barthel index. The data will be recorded for individuals with SCI at disease durations of 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months. The matched healthy controls will be measured during the same period of time after recruitment. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first to analyze the role of bilateral M1 hand area excitability changes in the evaluation and prediction of overall functional recovery (including motor function and activities of daily living) after SCI, which will further expand the traditional theory of the predominant role of M1, optimize the current rTMS treatment, and explore the brain-computer interface design for individuals with SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300068831.

Modulation of motor surround inhibition during motor tasks.

Surround inhibition (SI) in the motor system is important in individuation of actions, but is sometimes difficult to demonstrate. It has also not been evaluated in real life tasks. In this study, we use real life tasks and a new method where excitability of the surround muscle is assessed with respect to its current activity level rather than when it is at rest. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured in the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle while participants performed several motor tasks: "writing" on paper, "holding a pen" precisely and, "holding a water bottle" against gravity. These MEPs were compared to ADM MEPs amplitudes measured during a fifth finger abduction (ADM being the center muscle). SI was also measured in the traditional way, by comparing ADM MEPs during an index finger flexion and at rest. For the "writing" and "holding a pen" tasks, but not the "holding bottle" task, the MEP amplitudes were significantly smaller when compared to MEP amplitudes when the ADM was the center muscle with the same level of activation. The ADM MEP amplitudes were not different between rest and during index finger flexion. The new method employed here shows, that motor SI can be measured during tonic movements. The findings also show motor SI during two real-life motor tasks: "writing" and "holding a pen". The lack of modulation of MEP amplitude during "holding bottle" task seems to indicate that SI is action specific rather than muscle specific.

Variability of corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability for the ankle dorsiflexor tibialis anterior across repeated measurements in people with and without incomplete spinal cord injury.

To adequately evaluate the corticospinal and spinal plasticity in health and disease, it is essential to understand whether and to what extent the corticospinal and spinal responses fluctuate systematically across multiple measurements. Thus, in this study, we examined the session-to-session variability of corticospinal excitability for the ankle dorsiflexor tibialis anterior (TA) in people with and without incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). In neurologically normal participants, the following measures were obtained across 4 days at the same time of day (N = 13) or 4 sessions over a 12-h period (N = 9, at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00, and 20:00): maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), maximum M-wave and H-reflex (Mmax and Hmax), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, and silent period (SP) after MEP. In participants with chronic incomplete SCI (N = 17), the same measures were obtained across 4 days. We found no clear diurnal variation in the spinal and corticospinal excitability of the TA in individuals with no known neurological conditions, and no systematic changes in any experimental measures of spinal and corticospinal excitability across four measurement days in individuals with or without SCI. Overall, mean deviations across four sessions remained in a range of 5-13% for all measures in participants with or without SCI. The study shows the limited extent of non-systematic session-to-session variability in the TA corticospinal excitability in individuals with and without chronic incomplete SCI, supporting the utility of corticospinal and spinal excitability measures in mechanistic investigation of neuromodulation interventions. The information provided through this study may serve as the reference in evaluating corticospinal plasticity across multiple experimental sessions.

Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.

Human corticospinal excitability (CSE) modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting CSE. Whether individuals are able to return CSE to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals (ITI) of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-five healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: (1) prior to engaging in the response task during which participants were instructed only to rest (out-of-task), and (2) ITI of a choice-reaction time task (in-task). In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal (CS) output across a range of inputs. We hypothesized resting state CSE would be greater during ITI than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task ITI, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.

The excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials is not task-specific and spatially distinct from the contralateral motor hotspot.

OBJECTIVE: The role of ipsilateral descending motor pathways in voluntary movement of humans is still a matter of debate, with partly contradictory results. The aim of our study therefore was to examine the excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) regarding site and the specificity for unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion extension tasks. METHODS: MR-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the dominant hemisphere was performed in twenty healthy participants during tonic unilateral (iBB), bilateral homologous (bBB) or bilateral antagonistic elbow flexion-extension (iBB-cAE), the map center of gravity (CoG) and iMEP area from BB were obtained. RESULTS: The map CoG of the ipsilateral BB was located more anterior-laterally than the hotspot of the contralateral BB within the primary motor cortex, with a significant difference in CoG in iBB and iBB-cAE, but not bBB compared to the hotspot for the contralateral BB (each p < 0.05). However, different tasks had no effect on the size of the iMEPs. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that excitability of ipsilateral and contralateral MEP differ spatially in a task-specific manner suggesting the involvement of different motor networks within the motor cortex.

Investigating the Effects of Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuomotor Training Using TMS-EEG.

I-wave periodicity repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) can modify acquisition of a novel motor skill, but the associated neurophysiological effects remain unclear. The current study therefore used combined TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to investigate the neurophysiological effects of iTMS on subsequent visuomotor training (VT). Sixteen young adults (26.1 ± 5.1 years) participated in three sessions including real iTMS and VT (iTMS + VT), control iTMS and VT (iTMSControl + VT), or iTMS alone. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) were measured before and after iTMS, and again after VT, to assess neuroplastic changes. Irrespective of the intervention, MEP amplitude was not changed after iTMS or VT. Motor skill was improved compared with baseline, but no differences were found between stimulus conditions. In contrast, the P30 peak was altered by VT when preceded by control iTMS (P < 0.05), but this effect was not apparent when VT was preceded by iTMS or following iTMS alone (all P > 0.15). In contrast to expectations, iTMS was unable to modulate MEP amplitude or influence motor learning. Despite this, changes in P30 amplitude suggested that motor learning was associated with altered cortical reactivity. Furthermore, this effect was abolished by priming with iTMS, suggesting an influence of priming that failed to impact learning.

Language-related motor facilitation in Italian Sign Language signers.

Linguistic tasks facilitate corticospinal excitability as revealed by increased motor evoked potential (MEP) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the dominant hand. This modulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) excitability may reflect the relationship between speech and gestures. It is conceivable that in healthy individuals who use a sign language this cortical excitability modulation could be rearranged. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of spoken language tasks on M1 excitability in a group of hearing signers. Ten hearing Italian Sign Language (LIS) signers and 16 non-signer healthy controls participated. Single-pulse TMS was applied to either M1 hand area at the baseline and during different tasks: (i) reading aloud, (ii) silent reading, (iii) oral movements, (iv) syllabic phonation and (v) looking at meaningless non-letter strings. Overall, M1 excitability during the linguistic and non-linguistic tasks was higher in LIS group compared to the control group. In LIS group, MEPs were significantly larger during reading aloud, silent reading and non-verbal oral movements, regardless the hemisphere. These results suggest that in hearing signers there is a different modulation of the functional connectivity between the speech-related brain network and the motor system.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.

PURPOSE: There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces. METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve. RESULTS: MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential with tetanic stimulation changes pre- and post-hemispherotomy.

BACKGROUND: Careful examination of motor-evoked potential (MEP) findings is critical to the safety of intraoperative neuromonitoring during neurosurgery. We reviewed the intraoperative MEP findings in a pediatric patient who had undergone hemispherotomy for refractory epilepsy. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 4-year-and-2-month-old boy with extensive right cerebral hemisphere, drug-resistant epilepsy, left upper and lower extremity paralysis, and cognitive impairment. We examined intraoperative MEP results both before and after hemispherotomy. Post-hemispherotomy and MEPs were successfully elicited through transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) but not via direct cortical stimulation on the right side. Furthermore, TES on the right side, following hemispherotomy, led to a reduction in the MEP amplification effect resulting from tetanic stimulation of the left unilateral median and tibial nerves. Conversely, we observed the effects of MEP amplification during TES on the left side after tetanic stimulation of these nerves. Postoperatively, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram examinations, confirming the anatomical and electrophysiological completeness of the dissection. Notably, the seizures disappeared, and no apparent complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that TES can still activate deep structures and elicit MEPs, even in cases where the corticospinal connections to the posterior limb of the internal capsule are entirely severed. Thalamo-cortical interactions may affect the MEP amplification, observed during tetanic stimulation. Injury to the corticospinal tracts of the white matter may be obscured on conventional MEP findings; however, it may be identified by MEP changes in tetanic stimulation.

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials disappear with pons transection.

Motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is important for intraoperative motor function assessment in neurosurgery; however, false-negative results sometimes occur, and these findings should be interpreted with caution. Herein, we report an interesting MEP change resulting from a pons transection. The patient was a boy aged 5 years and 2 months. He underwent multiple craniotomies for cerebellar anaplastic ependymoma and was already paralyzed in the right upper and lower limbs. Therefore, we decided to remove the recurrent lesion from the left anterior pons. MEPs were recorded on both the right and left sides after the start of surgery but disappeared 1 h 30 min after the start of surgery in the TES on the operative side, even when the stimulation intensity was increased. The contralateral TES consistently recorded stable MEPs throughout the surgery. The tumor was completely resected on imaging. Immediately postoperatively, the patient experienced flaccid paralysis on the right side of the body, which recovered to preoperative levels over time. A transcranial MEP cannot be derived if the corticospinal tract is transected at the pons. Transcranial MEP findings may accurately reflect the corticospinal tract function if the injury is caudal to the pons.

Validity of evoked potential as biomarker for predicting early neural function changes after thoracic spinal decompression surgery in patients with neurological deficits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of intraoperative evoked potential (EP) including motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) as a biomarker for predicting neural function changes after thoracic spinal decompression (TSD) surgery. METHOD: A consecutive series of 336 TSD surgeries were reviewed between 2010 and 2021 from four spine center. All patients with TSD were divided into 3 groups according to different intraoperative EP results: group 1, EP alerts; group 2, no obvious EP deterioration; group 3, EP improvement compared with baselines. The lower limb Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (as well as early and long-term JOA recovery rate) were utilized to quantitatively assess pre- and postoperative neural function change. RESULTS: Among the 3 subgroups according to the different EP changes, the early JOA recovery rate (RR%) in the EP improvement group was significantly better than the other two groups (51.3 ± 58.6* vs. 27.5 ± 31.2 and 33.3 ± 43.1; p < 0.01) after 3-month follow-up. The mean MEP and SEP amplitude were from 116 ± 57 µV to 347 ± 71 µV (p < 0.01) and from 1.86 ± 0.24 µV to 2.65 ± 0.29 µV (p < 0.01) between spinal cord pre-decompression and post-decompression. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors of EP improvement were duration of symptom (p < 0.001, OR 10.9) and Preop. neurologic deficit degree (p = 0.013, OR 7.46). CONCLUSION: The intraoperative EP can predict postoperative neural function changes as a biomarker during TSD. Patient with EP improvement probably has better prognosis for early neural function recovery. The duration of symptom and preoperative neurologic deficit degree may be related to intraoperative EP improvement.

Predictive value of facial motor-evoked potential and electromyography for facial motor function in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) aims to preserve facial nerve (FN) function during vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. However, current techniques such as facial nerve motor evoked potentials (FNMEP) or electromyography (fEMG) alone are limited in predicting postoperative facial palsy (FP). The objective of this study was to analyze a compound fEMG/FNMEP approach. METHODS: Intraoperative FNMEP amplitude and the occurrence of fEMG-based A-trains were prospectively determined for the orbicularis oris (ORI) and oculi (OCU) muscle in 322 VS patients. Sensitivity and specificity of techniques to predict postoperative FN function were calculated. Confounding factors as tumor size, volume of intracranial air, or IONM duration were analyzed. RESULTS: A relevant immediate postoperative FP was captured in 105/322 patients with a significant higher risk in large VS. While fEMG demonstrated a high sensitivity (77% and 86% immediately and 15 month postoperative, respectively) for identifying relevant FP, specificity was low. In contrast, FNMEP have a significantly higher specificity of 80.8% for predicting postoperative FP, whereas the sensitivity is low. A retrospective combination of techniques demonstrated still an incorrect prediction of FP in ~ 1/3 of patients. CONCLUSIONS: FNMEP and fEMG differ in sensitivity and specificity to predict postoperative FP. Although a combination of IONM techniques during VS surgery may improve prediction of FN function, current techniques are still inaccurate. Further development is necessary to improve IONM approaches for FP prediction.