Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(5): 757-768, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33045256

RESUMO

Antibiotic use is necessary in the outpatient hemodialysis setting because patients receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk for infections and sepsis. However, inappropriate antibiotic use can lead to adverse drug events, including adverse drug reactions and infections with Clostridioides difficile and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Optimizing antibiotic use can decrease adverse events and improve infection cure rates and patient outcomes. The American Society of Nephrology and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created the Antibiotic Stewardship in Hemodialysis White Paper Writing Group, comprising experts in antibiotic stewardship, infectious diseases, nephrology, and public health, to highlight strategies that can improve antibiotic prescribing for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Based on existing evidence and the unique patient and clinical setting characteristics, the following strategies for improving antibiotic use are reviewed: expanding infection and sepsis prevention activities, standardizing blood culture collection processes, treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections with ß-lactams, optimizing communication between nurses and prescribing providers, and improving data sharing across transitions of care. Collaboration among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Society of Nephrology; other professional societies such as infectious diseases, hospital medicine, and vascular surgery societies; and dialysis provider organizations can improve antibiotic use and the quality of care for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Controle de Infecções , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Assistência Ambulatorial , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Hemocultura/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Auditoria Clínica , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Feedback Formativo , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Nefrologia , Transferência de Pacientes/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(4): 424-435, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778709

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New York State (NYS) mandates reporting of all hospital-associated communicable disease outbreaks. We describe trends in NYS surveillance for neonatal unit methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks, the evolution of national MRSA infection prevention and control (IPC) recommendations, and IPC measures taken by NYS neonatal units. METHODS: We evaluated trends of reported neonatal unit MRSA outbreaks by etiology from 2001 to 2017. We reviewed all reports and the use of IPC recommendations over time. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2017, 124 MRSA outbreaks were reported in 47 hospital neonatal units, with a total of 1,055 laboratory-confirmed infant cases, 18 infant deaths, and 52 laboratory-confirmed staff cases. The number of outbreaks increased with the level of care. During the study period, a higher proportion of hospitals reported implementing IPC measures, including reinforcing hand hygiene compliance (increased from 79.2% to 95.1%) and enhancing environmental cleaning and disinfection (increased from 4.2% to 78.0%) as well as performing active surveillance testing (AST) on exposed neonates (increased from 4.2% to 51.2%) and molecular testing on MRSA-positive isolates (increased from 5.3% to 18.9%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2001 to 2017, IPC measures in neonatal units increased in parallel with expanded national IPC recommendations. However, MRSA outbreaks in neonatal units continued to be frequent occurrences in NYS.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Controle de Infecções , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , New York/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
3.
Cureus ; 16(1): e53276, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38435906

RESUMO

Due to their propensity for causing diarrheal illnesses and their rising susceptibility to antimicrobials, Shigella infections constitute a serious threat to global public health. This extensive study explores the frequency, antibiotic resistance, genetic evolution, and effects of Shigella infections on vulnerable groups. The research covers a wide range of geographical areas and sheds information on how the prevalence of Shigella species is evolving. Shigella strain antimicrobial resistance patterns are thoroughly examined. Multidrug resistance (MDR) has been found to often occur in investigations, especially when older antimicrobials are used. The improper use of antibiotics in China is blamed for the quick emergence of resistance, and variations in resistance rates have been seen across different geographical areas. Shigella strains' genetic makeup can be used to identify emerging trends and horizontal gene transfer's acquisition of resistance genes. Notably, S. sonnei exhibits the capacity to obtain resistance genes from nearby bacteria, increasing its capacity for infection. The study also emphasizes the difficulties in accurately serotyping Shigella strains due to inconsistencies between molecular and conventional serology. These results highlight the necessity of reliable diagnostic methods for monitoring Shigella infections. In conclusion, this study emphasizes how dynamic Shigella infections are, with varying patterns of occurrence, changing resistance landscapes, and genetic adaptability. In addition to tackling the rising problem of antibiotic resistance in Shigella infections, these findings are essential for guiding efforts for disease surveillance, prevention, and treatment.

4.
AORN J ; 117(5): 291-299, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37102749

RESUMO

Since 1942, health care personnel have administered antibiotics in the United States to prevent and treat a variety of infections, including surgical site infections. Bacteria can mutate and develop resistance after frequent and repeated antibiotic exposure, thus limiting the antibiotic's effectiveness. Because antibiotic resistance can be passed from one bacterium to another, antibiotics are the only class of medications where use in one patient may negatively affect clinical outcomes in another. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) focuses on appropriate antibiotic selection, dosing, route, and duration of therapy; it seeks to minimize unplanned consequences, such as resistance and toxicity. Although there is a lack of literature on AS specific to perioperative nurses, general nursing practice includes AS activities (eg, assessing patient allergies, adhering to antibiotic administration recommendations). Perioperative nurses should participate in AS activities and use evidence-based strategies to communicate effectively with health care team members when advocating for appropriate antibiotic use.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Pessoal de Saúde
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36673754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-Acquired Infections (HAIs) are serious healthcare complications affecting hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and costs. Root cause analysis has identified the inappropriate use of antibiotics as the main causative factor in the expansion of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in our hospital. An Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) program was implemented to optimize antibiotic use, limit the development of resistance, improve therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes, and reduce costs. METHODS: The stewardship strategies were: antimicrobial oversight on "critical" antibiotics; the development of hospital guidelines on antibiotic selection with the production of a consensus document; the implementation of clinical and management control algorithms with visual impact and Business Intelligence methods; training and updating; and the monitoring of outcome measures and process indicators. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes: length of stay reduced by 0.23 days, hospital readmission/first month rates decreased by 19%, and mortality for infections reduced by 8.8%. Microbiological Outcomes: Clostridium Difficile colitis incidence reduced by 9.1%.Economic Outcomes: Reduction in antimicrobial costs by 35% on average fee/discharged patient. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic application of the AMS program in a small hospital led to multiple improvements in clinical, microbiological, and economic outcome measures. The analysis of the core indicators for our hospital AMS program showed a significant adherence to the model and hospital recommendations.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Itália/epidemiologia
6.
Trends Microbiol ; 30(9): 853-865, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35184972

RESUMO

The human gut is host to a diverse range of microorganisms that offer protection against colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Antibiotic use, medications, health conditions, and lifestyle factors can alter the composition of the gut microbiota in such a way that results in loss of colonization resistance and increased susceptibility to invading pathogenic antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Therapeutics aiming to restore a diverse and protective microbiome are fast advancing. In this review, we focus on the compositional changes within the gut microbiome that are associated with colonization resistance and discuss their use as potential targets for therapeutics or diagnostics.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos
7.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 817030, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35515349

RESUMO

Background: Nosocomial infection with multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) can directly influence the curative effect and the prognosis of neonates, bringing great difficulties to clinical treatment. As direct contacts of neonates, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of doctors and nurses are critical for the prevention and control of MDRO infection in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Purpose: This study describes the KAP of doctors and nurses in NICUs toward the prevention and control of nosocomial infection with MDRO and analyzes its influencing factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study used convenience sampling to survey 397 doctors and nurses from the NICU of 28 hospitals in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. A univariate analysis and a multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data. Results: The median scoring rate (interquartile range) of the knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire was 0.86 (0.82-0.91), 0.98 (0.91-1.00), and 0.995 (0.97-1.00), respectively. However, the median scoring rate regarding "basic knowledge of MDRO" and "special prevention and control measures" was 0.50 in knowledge. The multiple linear regression showed that the influencing factors of KAP were hospital grade, professional title, gender, regular supervision, and training. Conclusions: There was still room for improvement in the KAP of NICU doctors and nurses, especially regarding the knowledge. Men, doctors and nurses in Grade II hospitals, and doctors and nurses with primary professional titles had worse KAP. Training and supervision helped improve the KAP. Relevance to Clinical Practice: To improve the KAP of doctors and nurses to enhance the prevention and control effect for the MDRO infection in NICUs, hospitals and departments should carry out targeted training and strengthen supervision, while Grade II hospitals, men, and doctors and nurses with primary professional titles need more attention.

8.
Ann Palliat Med ; 10(4): 4555-4562, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The increasing occurrence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) infections has posed major challenge to solid organ transplantation (SOT). For SOT recipients, high-dose immunosuppressants and broad-spectrum antibiotics can markedly increase the risk of early postoperative MDRO infections and thus have adverse effects on the outcomes of SOT. Here, we analyzed the incidence and clinical features of early MDRO infections after SOT, in an attempt to provide new evidence for the control and treatment of early MDROs. METHODS: The clinical data of 133 patients with MDRO infections after SOT in our department from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively collected, and clinical features including incidence, etiologies, infection sites, and complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of MDRO infections after SOT was 9.9%. Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation patients had the highest incidence of MDRO infections, followed by the recipients of liver transplantation and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; patients undergoing renal transplantation had the lowest incidence of MDRO infections. The most common pathogen was extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms (n=88, 66.2%), the most common infection site was the urinary system (n=58, 43.6%), and the main postoperative complications were urinary tract infections (n=44, 33.1%) and lung infections (n=41, 30.8%). MDRO infections were cured in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: A sound knowledge of the clinical features of MDRO infection after SOT is important for the successful prevention and treatment of these infections.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Transplante de Órgãos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Incidência , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
GMS Infect Dis ; 9: Doc04, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34540530

RESUMO

Objective: To analyze, in a urology ward, the prevalence and characteristics of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Methods: We carried out an observational study from 2012 to 2019, evaluating MDRO among patients with HAIs, who were hospitalized in the urology ward. MDRO include Pseudomonas spp., resistant to at least three antibiotic groups, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae or those resistant to carbapenems, and Enterococcus spp. resistant to vancomycin. Results: Among patients with HAIs, MDRO were isolated in 100 out of 438 (22.8%) positive cultures. Univariate and multivariate analyses reported that prior urinary tract infection (UTI) [OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.14-5.36; p=0.021] and immunosuppression [OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.11-4.10; p=0.023] were risk factors for MDRO. A high prevalence of MRDO was found in patients with a catheter in the upper urinary tract; 27.6% for double J stent, 29.6% in those with a nephrostomy tube, and 50% in those with a percutaneous internal/external nephroureteral (PCNU) stent. MDRO were isolated in 28.4% of cultures with Enterobacteriaceae (23.8% and 44.7% in those with E. coli and Klebsiella spp.); 7% of Enterobacteriaceae showed resistance to carbapenems (1.3% and 10% for E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively). Three out of 80 Enterococcus spp. were vancomycin-resistant. The rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to at least three antibiotic groups was 36.3%. Conclusions: The isolation of MDRO, in up to 25% of positive cultures in a urology ward, constitutes a challenge for the selection of antibiotics. MDRO are more common in immunosuppressed patients, those with previous UTIs, and those with a catheter in the upper urinary tract.

10.
AORN J ; 114(6): 572-585, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34846741

RESUMO

The World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention consider the global increase in multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to be one of the greatest modern threats to public health. Limited treatment options exist for microorganisms such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Candida auris; as a result, infected patients may experience poor outcomes. Perioperative nurses should use infection prevention measures (eg, contact precautions) to prevent the spread of emerging MDROs when transporting patients to and from procedures, caring for patients during procedures, and completing between-procedure cleaning. Because nurses are involved with all phases of perioperative care, they are well-positioned to serve as infection prevention champions and provide education to personnel, patients, and caregivers. This article describes actions and steps the perioperative nurse should take during implementation of contact precautions to prevent the transmission of MDROs-specifically, emerging pathogens carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and C auris.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Candida auris , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Controle de Infecções
11.
Ann Transl Med ; 7(7): 135, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Serum procalcitonin (PCT) is a widely recognized inflammatory marker which can distinguish systemic bacterial infection from other types of infections. The ability of PCT levels to distinguish different pathogens from different focus of infection is contradictory. METHODS: This study included 551 patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) diagnosed with positive blood culture (BC) during Jan 2013 and May 2018. The patients were divided into two groups with or without definite focus of infection. In this study, we analyzed PCT levels induced by Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungal infection. Relationship of time between PCT peak and BC collection, and the impact of antibiotics usage on PCT peak distribution were examined. RESULTS: For patients without definite focus of infection, the serum PCT values of Gram-negative bacteria were higher than that of Gram-positive bacteria (P<0.05). A cut-off value of 7.54 ng/mL for PCT showed a sensitivity of 88.3%. For patients with definite focus of infection, the serum PCT values of Gram-negative bacteria were significantly higher than Gram-positive bacteria in patients with lower respiratory tract (P=0.003), abdominal (P=0.039), urinary tract infection (P=0.025), but not in patients with upper respiratory tract infection (P=0.664). The PCT values between multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) and sensitive bacteria were not statistically significant (P>0.05) among all patients. Moreover, among patients who use antibiotics before BC collection, the longer antibiotics used, the higher trend of the proportion for PCT peak distribution after BC collection. The higher proportion of antibiotics combined before BC collection, the lower proportion of PCT peak distribution appeared before BC collection, and the higher the proportion of PCT peak distribution appeared after BC collection. CONCLUSIONS: PCT value is determined by many factors. PCT value is related to not only Gram-positive bacteria or Gram-negative bacteria, but also related to specific pathogens, and specific of infection sites etc. The use of Antibiotics is also an important factor of PCT value.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA