Upgrade Rates of Variant Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Compared to Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed in Core Needle Biopsies: A 10-Year Single Institution Retrospective Study.

The primary aim of this study was to determine the upgrade rates of variant lobular carcinoma in situ (V-LCIS, ie, combined florid [F-LCIS] and pleomorphic [P-LCIS]) compared with classic LCIS (C-LCIS) when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The secondary goal was to determine the rate of progression/development of invasive carcinoma on long-term follow-up after primary excision. After institutional review board approval, our institutional pathology database was searched for patients with "pure" LCIS diagnosed on CNB who underwent subsequent excision. Radiologic findings were reviewed, radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) correlation was performed, and follow-up patient outcome data were obtained. One hundred twenty cases of LCIS were identified on CNB (C-LCIS = 97, F-LCIS = 18, and P-LCIS = 5). Overall upgrade rates after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS were 14% (14/97), 44% (8/18), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Of the total cases, 79 (66%) were deemed rad-path concordant. Of these, the upgrade rate after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS was 7.5% (5 of 66), 40% (4 of 10), and 0% (0 of 3), respectively. The overall upgrade rate for V-LCIS was higher than for C-LCIS (P = .004), even for the cases deemed rad-path concordant (P value: .036). Most upgraded cases (23 of 24) showed pT1a disease or lower. With an average follow-up of 83 months, invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast was identified in 8/120 (7%) cases. Six patients had died: 2 of (contralateral) breast cancer and 4 of other causes. Because of a high upgrade rate, V-LCIS diagnosed on CNB should always be excised. The upgrade rate for C-LCIS (even when rad-path concordant) is higher than reported in many other studies. Rad-path concordance read, surgical consultation, and individualized decision making are recommended for C-LCIS cases. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma after LCIS diagnosis is small (7% with ∼7-year follow-up), but active surveillance is required to diagnose early-stage disease.

Evaluation of fine-needle core biopsy specimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Diagnostic utility and helpful histological features.

AIMS: With the advent of new biopsy devices, fine-needle core biopsy specimens can be obtained from pancreas masses. This study aimed to report the histological spectrum of intrapancreatic adenocarcinoma on fine-needle core biopsy and the accuracy of sampling. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 423 SharkCore™ fine-needle core biopsies taken from patients with a high clinical concern for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. For each, we recorded patient age and sex, percentage of diagnostic tissue in each sample and tumour site, size and histological findings. The cases came from 392 patients (193 men, 199 women; mean age 69 years). Median diagnostic tissue amount in the samples was 30%. Common histological findings included desmoplasia (36%), single atypical cells (44%), haphazard glandular growth pattern (68%), nuclear pleomorphism > 4:1 (39%), incomplete gland lumens (18%) and detached atypical epithelial strips (37%). Additional levels were ordered on 143 cases. Final clinical diagnoses associated with the 423 cases were adenocarcinoma (n = 343), pancreatitis (n = 22), intraductal neoplasm or other benign/low-grade process (n = 16) and unknown (n = 42, patients lost to follow-up). Of the adenocarcinoma cases, the diagnosis was established by the evaluated fine-needle core biopsy sample alone in 178, by fine-needle aspiration biopsy alone in 30, by both concurrently in 89 and by subsequent biopsy or resection in 37 cases. Among 68 cases called suspicious on fine-needle core biopsy, 78% ultimately represented adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle core biopsy allows for histological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, using known histological parameters. Common findings include single atypical cells, desmoplasia, haphazard gland growth and nuclear pleomorphism. Cases interpreted as suspicious often represent malignancy.

Application of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology to core needle biopsies of the parotid gland.

AIMS: The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was developed by an international group of experts and first published in 2018 with the goal to standardise reporting of salivary gland aspirates. Seven categories with distinct risks of malignancy were proposed. Core needle biopsies (CNB) of salivary glands are also common, but reporting lacks standardisation. Here we explore the feasibility of a Milan-like reporting system on CNB of the parotid gland. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our laboratory information system was searched for parotid gland CNBs from 2010 to 2021. Reports were translated into a Milan-like reporting system. When available, CNB findings were correlated with cytology and resection specimens. In order to compare the performance of CNB with fine-needle aspirations (FNA), we established a second cohort of cases consisting of parotid FNA with surgical follow-up. The risk of neoplasia (RON) and risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for FNA and CNB Milan categories using cases with follow-up resection. We analysed 100 cases of parotid gland CNB. Of these cases, 32 underwent subsequent resection, while 52 had concurrent FNA. A total of 20 cases had concurrent FNA and underwent follow-up resection. In 63 (63%) cases, a specific diagnosis was provided on CNB, with 18 cases undergoing follow-up resection having an accuracy rate of 94%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasible of using a Milan-like system in the setting of parotid gland CNB with differentiation in RON and ROM. CNB allows assessment of architectural features that may allow more specific diagnoses in some cases.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound likely does not improve diagnostic adequacy during endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Solid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and carrying risks to the patients. AIM: assess the diagnostic adequacy of tissue acquisition using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) compared to conventional EUS. METHODS: Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched in November 2023. Studies comparing diagnostic adequacy, accuracy and safety using CEH-EUS versus conventional EUS for tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies, level of evidence using the GRADE approach, Odds Ratios (RR) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. I2 quantified heterogeneity. RESULTS: The search identified 3858 records; nine studies (1160 patients) were included. OR for achieving an adequate sample was 1.467 (CI: 0.850-2.533), for randomized trials 0.902 (CI: 0.541-1.505), for non-randomized 2.396 (CI: 0.916-6.264), with significant subgroup difference. OR for diagnostic accuracy was 1.326 (CI: 0.890-1977), for randomized trials 0.997 (CI: 0.593-1.977) and for non-randomized studies 1.928 (CI: 1.096-3.393), significant subgroup difference (p = 0.0467). No differences were observed for technical failures or adverse events. Heterogeneity was low, risk of bias "low" to "some concerns" for most outcomes, mostly moderate for non-randomized studies. CONCLUSION: Non-randomized studies indicated differences in favor of contrast-enhanced EUS, randomized studies showed no difference in diagnostic adequacy, accuracy or sensitivity when using CEH-EUS.

Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS-fine needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal number of passes to maximize the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) of solid pancreatic masses (SPMs) is not well known. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of the incremental number of passes on diagnostic accuracy, tissue adequacy, and diagnostic yield for EUS-FNB of SPMs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing per-pass diagnostic outcomes of FNB needles in patients with SPMs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. A separate analysis was performed on studies that used contemporary Franseen and fork-tip needles. RESULTS: Overall, 19 RCTs (N=3,552) were identified. For EUS-FNB of SPMs, three passes with any FNB needle outperformed two passes for accuracy (OR=1.58; 95%CI 1.20-2.09; I2=0%), adequacy (OR=1.97; 95%CI 1.30-2.83; I2=61%) and yield (OR=2.12; 95%CI 1.37-3.27; I2 14%). Adding a fourth or fifth pass resulted in no significant improvement in diagnostic parameters. When using contemporary FNB needles, adding a second to a single pass significantly improved accuracy (OR=1.80; 95%CI 1.23-2.63; I2=0%), adequacy (OR=2.19; 95% CI 1.65-2.90; I2=0%) and yield (OR=2.72; 95%CI 1.50-4.95; I2=0%). Adding a third pass to a second pass with contemporary needles improved adequacy (OR=2.96; 95%CI 1.97-4.46; I2=0%) but did not provide better diagnostic accuracy or yield. CONCLUSION: Two passes with Franseen or Fork-tip needles and three passes with any FNB needle suffice to provide optimal diagnostic performance for EUS-FNB of SPMs, without additional diagnostic benefits with more passes. Our results can inform future guidelines and quality benchmarks.

The CONFIRM trial protocol: the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in active surveillance for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives: To determine the additive value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the risk stratification of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) who would have otherwise been deemed suitable for active surveillance (AS). Specifically, we aim to determine if PSMA PET/CT can detect a cohort of men on AS that are in fact high risk and likely to experience unfavourable outcomes should they remain on their current treatment pathway. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to determine the additive value of PSMA PET/CT to repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate and explore whether a confirmatory biopsy may be avoided in men with a negative PSMA PET/CT and a negative repeat mpMRI of the prostate (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of <3). Furthermore, to develop a nomogram combining clinical, imaging and biomarker data to predict the likelihood of failure on AS in men with high-risk features. Also, a blood sample will be taken to perform a Prostate Health Index test at the time of confirmatory biopsy. Furthermore, a portion of this blood will be stored at a biobank for up to 5 years if a follow-up study on molecular biomarkers and genetic assays in this cohort of men is indicated, based on the results from the CONFIRM trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CONFIRM trial is a prospective, multicentre, pre-test/post-test, cohort study across Victoria, Australia, involving men with newly diagnosed low-risk PCa with high-risk features, considered suitable for AS and undergoing confirmatory biopsy. The trial's goal is to provide high-quality evidence to establish whether PSMA PET/CT has a role in risk-stratifying men deemed suitable for AS despite having high-risk feature(s). RESULTS: The CONFIRM trial will measure the proportion of men deemed unsuitable for ongoing AS based on pathological upgrading and multidisciplinary team recommendation due to PSMA PET/CT scan and PSMA-targeted confirmatory biopsy. Additionally, the positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of PSMA PET/CT will be calculated in isolation and combined with repeat mpMRI of the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine if PSMA-PET/CT and standard of care (prostate biopsy ± repeat mpMRI) can improve diagnostic certainty in men undergoing confirmatory biopsy for low-grade PCa with high-risk features.

Volume reduction rate of radiofrequency ablation in ≤ 2 cm Bethesda IV thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV cytology and C-TIRADS 4A categorization. Additionally, the factors influencing the completed absorption of ablation (CAA) were examined. METHODS: A total of 62 cases with 62 nodules underwent ultrasound-guided RFA and were included in the study. The volume reduction rate (VRR), CAA, and incomplete absorption of ablation (IAA) were assessed at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and subsequent 6-month follow-ups. Clinical and ultrasound features were compared between the CAA and IAA groups at the 12th month follow-up. RESULTS: The average VRR at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month, and last follow-up were -88.6%, 16.0%, 59.7%, 82.0%, and 98.2%, respectively. More than half of the nodules achieved a 90% VRR after 1 year of RFA, with 88.7% demonstrating CAA at the end of the study (follow-up duration of 14 to 63 months). Nodules with grade 3 vascularity and those associated with chronic thyroiditis showed delayed CAA at the 12th month follow-up (p = 0.036 and 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: RFA is an effective technique for treating ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV cytology and C-TIRADS 4A categorization. Nodules with grade 3 blood supply and patients with chronic thyroiditis exhibited an impact on the completed absorption following RFA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study has shown that radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda IV cytology. However, we identified that high vascularity of the nodule and chronic thyroiditis are adverse factors affecting the completed absorption of the ablation. KEY POINTS: •Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective technique for treatment of ≤ 2 cm Bethesda IV category thyroid nodules. •Higher blood supply and chronic thyroiditis influence the completed absorption after RFA.

The advent of the first electric driven EUS-guided 17 gauge core needle biopsy - A pilot study on subepithelial lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This pilot study aimed to evaluate safety and tissue sampling from subepithelial lesions (SEL) in the upper gastrointestinal tract with a novel electric motor driven endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 17-gauge (G) size core needle biopsy (CNB) instrument. METHODS: An investigator-led prospective open label, performance and safety control study, including seven patients (female n = 4, median 71 y, range 28-75) with a determined SEL (median size 30 mm, range 17-150 mm) in the upper digestive tract (stomach n = 6, duodenum n = 1) were eligible and later followed up 14 days after index procedure. All investigations were completed according to protocol with three FNB 22-G passes with four fanning strokes and two EndoDrill® 17-G passes with three fanning strokes. RESULTS: Quality of samples as 'visible pieces' (>5 mm): FNB (n = 5/7) (fragmented/blood imbibed n = 1, poor tissue quantity n = 1) compared with 17-G CNB (n = 7/7). Histological result which led to final diagnosis (leiomyoma n = 2, adenocarcinoma n = 1, schwannoma n = 1, neuroendocrine tumour n = 1, desmoid tumour n = 1 and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) n = 1) could be obtained with the 17-G CNB instrument in all seven patients. FNB technique reached correct diagnosis in six patients. No serious adverse event were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: By using an electric driven 17-G biopsy device, a true cylinder of core tissue can be obtained in one single puncture from the area of interest reducing the need for a second sampling. The absolute benefit of EUS-guided CNB is that the sample can be handled and histologically prepared in the same manner as standard percutaneous core needle sample, e.g., breast and prostate cancer.

Adrenal Mass Biopsy in Patients Without Extraadrenal Primary Malignancy: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND. Adrenal washout CT is not useful for evaluating incidental adrenal masses in patients without known or suspected primary extraadrenal malignancy. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of adrenal mass biopsy in patients without known or suspected extraadrenal primary malignancy. METHODS. This retrospective six-center study included 69 patients (mean age, 56 years; 32 men, 37 women) without known or suspected extraadrenal primary malignancy who underwent image-guided core needle biopsy between January 2004 and June 2021 of a mass suspected to be arising from the adrenal gland. Biopsy results were classified as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. For masses resected after biopsy, histopathologic concordance was assessed between diagnoses from biopsy and resection. Masses were classified as benign or malignant by resection or imaging follow-up, and all nondi-agnostic biopsies were classified as false results. RESULTS. The median mass size was 7.4 cm (range, 1.9-19.2 cm). Adrenal mass biopsy had a diagnostic yield of 64% (44/69; 95% CI, 51-75%). After biopsy, 25 masses were resected, and 44 had imaging follow-up. Of the masses that were resected after diagnostic biopsy, diagnosis was concordant between biopsy and resection in 100% (12/12). Of the 13 masses that were resected after nondiagnostic biopsy, the diagnosis from re-section was benign in eight masses and malignant in five masses. The 44 masses with imaging follow-up included one mass with diagnostic biopsy yielding benign adenoma and two masses with nondiagnostic biopsy results that were classified as malignant by imaging follow-up. Biopsy had overall sensitivity and specificity for malignancy of 73% (22/30) and 54% (21/39), respectively; diagnostic biopsies had sensitivity and specificity for malignancy of 96% (22/23) and 100% (21/21), respectively. Among nine nondi-agnostic biopsies reported as adrenocortical neoplasm, six were classified as malignant by the reference standard (resection showing adrenocortical carcinoma in four, resection showing adrenocortical neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential in one, imaging follow-up consistent with malignancy in one). CONCLUSION. Adrenal mass biopsy had low diagnostic yield, with low sensitivity and low specificity for malignancy. A biopsy result of adrenocortical neoplasm did not reliably differentiate benign and malignant adrenal masses. CLINICAL IMPACT. Biopsy appears to have limited utility for the evaluation of incidental adrenal masses in patients without primary extraadrenal malignancy.

Synchronous Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy and Microwave Ablation for Highly Suspicious Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate management of suspected malignant pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of synchronous computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and microwave ablation (MWA) for patients highly suspicious of having malignant GGNs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records between July 2020 and April 2023 from our medical center. Eligible patients synchronously underwent PTNB and MWA (either MWA immediately after PTNB [PTNB-first group] or PTNB immediately after MWA [MWA-first group]) at the the physician's discretion. We analyzed the rate of definitive diagnosis and technical success, the length of hospital stay, the postoperative efficacy, and periprocedural complications. RESULTS: Of 65 patients who were enrolled, the rate of definitive diagnosis was 86.2%, which did not differ when stratified by the tumor size, the consolidation-to-tumor ratio, or the sequence of the two procedures (all p > 0.05). The diagnostic rate of malignancy was 83.1%. After the median follow-up duration of 18.5 months, the local control rate was 98.2% and the rate of completed ablation was 48.2%. The rate of perioperative minor and major complications was 44.6% and 6.2%, respectively. The most common adverse events included pain, cough, and mild hemorrhage. Mild hemorrhage took place significantly less frequently in the MWA-first group than in the PTNB-first group (16.7% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Synchronous PTNB and MWA are feasible and well tolerated for patients highly suspicious of having malignant GGNs, providing an alternative option for patients who are ineligible for surgical resection.

Adenocarcinoma originating in the anterior mediastinum diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy (EBUS-cryobiopsy) is advantageous for collecting larger specimens with minimal crushing; however, it has not been widely used for mediastinal tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. Computed tomography showed a mass in the anterior mediastinum that was in extensive contact with the sternum on the ventral side and partly with the trachea on the dorsal side. Two computed tomography-guided needle biopsies (CTNBs) were performed on the mass; however, a definitive diagnosis was not made because of severe crush artifacts. Subsequently, we performed EBUS-cryobiopsy and safely obtained sufficient specimen volume with minimal crushing. The histopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma, with immunobiological features distinct from those of previous breast cancers. Her overall diagnosis was a rare tumor originating in the anterior mediastinum. CONCLUSIONS: EBUS-cryobiopsy can be safely performed in narrow areas surrounded by major blood vessels, and the obtained specimens may be superior to CTNBs for histopathological diagnosis.

Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic efficiency of 19G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling for subepithelial tumors (SETs). METHODS: The data of patients with SETs who underwent 19G FNA or 22G FNB were reviewed retrospectively in two tertiary hospitals. Tissue cores were assessed by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE). Cytological or histological diagnosis were classified as definite, suspect, or no diagnosis. RESULTS: Seventy five patients (mean age: 55 years, 44 males) underwent 19G EUS-FNA (31) or 22G EUS-FNB (44). The overall diagnostic yield was 82.7%. The rate of definite cytological diagnoses was 9.7% (3/31) in 19G and 13.6% (6/44) in 22G group (x2 = 1.520, P = .468). In terms of MOSE, 19G needle, requiring only two punctures, achieved a higher good tissue core rate than 22G group (100.0% [31/31] versus 84.1% [37/44], x2 = 5.440, P = .020]). For histological diagnosis, the 19G group achieved higher definite rate than the 22G group, 93.6% (29/31) versus 65.9% (29/44) (x2 = 7.957, P = .019) on the first puncture, 90.3% (28/31) versus 63.6% (28/44) (x2 = 7.139, P = .028) on the second puncture, 96.8% (30/31) versus 70.5% (31/44) (x2 = 7.319, P = .026) on both the first and second punctures, and 96.8% (30/31) versus 72.7% (32/44) (x2 = 7.538, P = .023) on all three punctures. CONCLUSIONS: The 19G EUS-FNA requires only two punctures to achieve better tissue core quality by MOSE and yields a higher rate of histological diagnosis than 22G ProCore needle for SETs. The bigger 19G FNA needle seems to play an important role in the evaluation of SETs.

Digital analyses of nuclear features can help discriminate among non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features, papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular subtype, and follicular carcinoma in cytological specimens.

BACKGROUND: As it stands, the diagnosis of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is primarily based on histological analysis. We hypothesised that computerised analysis of nuclear images of cytological specimens could be used to differentiate NIFTP from papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular subtype (PTCFS) and follicular carcinoma (FC), influencing patient management. METHODS: We employed a retrospective analytical observational study based on nuclear morphometric variables of cytological material from thyroid nodules classified as PTCFS, NIFTP, or FC. Five cases of each entity were analysed. Cytological slides were photographed, and 1170 cells for each entity were analysed digitally. The captured images were evaluated (blindly) using the ImageJ software package. The morphometric evaluation included area, perimeter, width, height, and circularity. Numerical variables were expressed as mean, median, minimum, and maximum (min; max) values. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used with a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Regarding nuclear analysis, all variables differed among the three groups (p < 0.001). Given the interdependence among the variables, these data indicated that nuclear size was greatest in the NIFTP group, followed by FC and PTCFS. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our analysis of the digital images, with a focus on nuclear parameters, found significantly difference among cytological specimens from cases of NIFTP, PTCFS and FC. Thus, this tool has the potential to provide additional information that may help in the diagnosis of NIFTP, even during the preoperative period. Additional studies are needed to create protocols, evaluate the applicability of nuclear morphological and morphometric parameters-focusing on digital pathology-and create algorithms and tools to assist cytopathologists with their diagnostic routines.

Uses and limitations of small-volume biopsies for the diagnosis of lymphoma.

Although surgical biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of lymphoma, small-volume biopsies including fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy are increasingly being used as a first line diagnostic tool. Small-volume biopsies are safe, rapid and cost effective; however, diagnostic utility varies by lymphoma subtype. It is important for pathologists and clinicians to recognize both the strengths and limitations of such biopsies.

Unleash your potential: Inside interventional pathology.

Interventional pathology has emerged as a pivotal force in modern healthcare, heralding a paradigm shift from traditional diagnostic approaches to patient-centered care. This innovative field bridges the gap between pathology and cytopathology, empowering pathologists to streamline diagnoses and reduce waiting times for patients. Collaborative mentorship and knowledge sharing ensure a lasting legacy of diagnostic excellence for future generations. Interventional pathology stands as a symbol of innovation and patient empowerment, offering a unified approach to diagnostics and improved care in the era of personalized medicine. This narrative chronicles the evolution of interventional pathologists from behind-the-scenes diagnostic specialists to frontline innovators. This is the story of the rise of the interventional pathologist: a testament to innovation, dedication, and an unwavering commitment to patient well-being.

Combined fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the same setting: A two-years' experience.

INTRODUCTION: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and ancillary techniques is an accurate diagnostic tool for many pathologies. However, in some cases, it may not be sufficient for actionable diagnoses or molecular testing, especially for cases that require large immunohistochemical panels or cases in which histological features are mandatory for the diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB), on the contrary, provides samples that are suitable for histological features and sufficient for all ancillary studies. However, CNB is often performed by radiologists or clinicians without the direct participation of cytopathologists, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnoses. This study reports on the experience of combining FNAC and CNB performed in one setting by cytopathologists. The aim was to evaluate the impact of CNB on FNAC and the diagnostic efficiency of the combined procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-two FNAC and CNB procedures performed in the same setting over a period of 2 years were analysed. The FNAC diagnoses were compared and integrated with the subsequent CNB diagnoses. The impact of CNB was categorized as follows: non-contributory, in cases of inadequate samples; confirmed, when the CNB and FNAC diagnoses were the same; improved, when the CNB diagnosis was consistent with the FNAC diagnosis and further specified the corresponding entity; allowed, when CNB produced a diagnosis that could not be reached by FNAC; changed, when the CNB changed the previous FNAC diagnosis. RESULTS: CNB confirmed the FNAC diagnosis in 40.1% of cases (n = 57/142). CNB improved the FNAC diagnosis in 47.2% of cases (n = 67/142). CNB allowed a diagnosis that could not be performed on FNAC in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB changed a previous FNAC diagnosis in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB was non-contributory in 8.4% of cases (n = 12/142). CNB produced a positive impact on the whole diagnostic procedure in 51.4% of total cases (n = 73/142). The combined FNAC and CNB resulted in actionable diagnoses in 91.5% of all cases (n = 130/142). A complete molecular assessment was successfully performed in 14.7% of cases (n = 21/142) utilizing either FNAC or CNB material. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of FNAC and CNB in one setting improves the diagnostic accuracy of both procedures. This approach exploits the advantages of each procedure, enhancing the accuracy of the final diagnosis.

Characteristic morphology and immunohistochemical patterns of clear cell papillary renal cell tumours may be observed in renal cell carcinomas, a critical pitfall in renal biopsy cytopathology.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell papillary renal cell tumour (CCPRCT) was renamed from previous clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) in the latest WHO Classification of Tumours. It is essential to differentiate RCC from CCPRCT in renal mass biopsies (RMB). DESIGN: RMB cases with subsequent resections were reviewed. The pathology reports and pertinent clinical information were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen cases displaying either CCPRCT morphology (20% diffuse, 67% focal) or immunohistochemical patterns (cup-like CA9: 20% diffuse, 47% focal; CK7: 33% diffuse, 40% focal) were identified. One case was positive for TFE3. TSC mutation was identified in one case. Both cases exhibited both CCPRCT morphology and immunohistochemical patterns for CA9 and CK7, with focal high-grade nuclei. RMB diagnoses were as follows: 6 (40%) as CCRCC, 2 (13%) as CCPRCT, 2 (13%) as CCRCC versus CCPRCT, 2 (13%) as CCRCC versus PRCC, 1 (7%) as RCC with TSC mutation versus CCPRCT, 1 (7%) as TFE3-rearranged RCC versus PRCC, and 1 (7%) as cyst with low-grade atypia. 71% of patients underwent nephrectomy, 21% received systemic treatment for stage 4 RCCs, and 7% with ablation for small renal mass (1.6 cm) with low-grade CCRCC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that morphologic and immunochemical features of CCPRCT may be present in RCCs, including RCC-TFE3 expression and TSC-associated RCC, a critical pitfall to misdiagnose aggressive RCC as indolent CCPRCT and result in undertreatment. Careful examination of morphology and immunostains for CA9, CK7, and TFE3, as well as molecular tests, is crucial for distinguishing aggressive RCC from indolent CCPRCT.

Consensus statements on endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Guidelines from the Asian Endoscopic Ultrasound Group.

OBJECTIVES: This consensus was developed by the Asian EUS Group (AEG), who aimed to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). METHODS: The AEG initiated the development of consensus statements and formed an expert panel comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, and pathologists. Three online consensus meetings were conducted to consolidate the statements and votes. The statements were presented and discussed in the first two consensus meetings and revised according to comments. Final voting was conducted at a third consensus meeting. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was adopted to define the strength of the recommendations and quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 20 clinical questions and statements regarding EUS-TA were formulated. The committee recommended that fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles be preferred over conventional fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles for EUS-TA of subepithelial lesions. For solid pancreatic masses, rapid on-site evaluation is not routinely recommended when FNB needles are used. For dedicated FNB needles, fork-tip and Franseen-tip needles have essentially equivalent performance. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides guidance for EUS-TA, thereby enhancing the quality of EUS-TA.

Percutaneous core needle biopsy of neuroblastoma in the pediatric population: what have we learned in the last decade.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, neuroblastoma has been diagnosed by surgical open biopsy (SB). In recent decades, core needle biopsy (CNB) has replaced surgical biopsy due to its safe and adequate method of obtaining tissue diagnosis. AIM: Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CNB in obtaining tissue diagnosis for neuroblastoma and evaluate its safety profile in terms of post-operative complications, in comparison to SB. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, including all patients younger than 18 years who were diagnosed with neuroblastoma from 2012 until 2022 in a single tertiary medical center. Patients' demographics, tumor size and location, pathological results, and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: 79 patients were included in our study: 35 biopsies were obtained using image-guided CNB and 44 using SB. Patients' and tumor characteristics including age, gender, tumor volume, and stage were similar in both groups. The biopsy adequacy rate in the CNB group was 91% and 3 patients in this group underwent repeated biopsy. The safety profile in the CNB group was similar to the SB group. CONCLUSIONS: CNB is a safe method and should be considered the first choice for obtaining tissue diagnosis when feasible due to its high adequacy in terms of tumor histopathological features.

The confusing pelvic mass: A case of small intestine lesion diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy through the sigmoid colon.

Here we report a successful case of a small bowel lesion obtained through EUS-FNB via the sigmoid colon after routine small bowel endoscopy failed due to bowel volvulus. This case highlights the feasibility of EUS-FNB in small intestine lesion acquisition through sigmoid colon.