Clinical outcomes among initial survivors of cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepsy (NORSE).

OBJECTIVE: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare but severe clinical syndrome. Despite rigorous evaluation, the underlying cause is unknown in 30%-50% of patients and treatment strategies are largely empirical. The aim of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in a cohort of well-phenotyped, thoroughly investigated patients who survived the initial phase of cryptogenic NORSE managed in specialist centers. METHODS: Well-characterized cases of cryptogenic NORSE were identified through the EPIGEN and Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortia (CCEMRC) during the period 2005-2019. Treating epileptologists reported on post-NORSE survival rates and sequelae in patients after discharge from hospital. Among survivors >6 months post-discharge, we report the rates and severity of active epilepsy, global disability, vocational, and global cognitive and mental health outcomes. We attempt to identify determinants of outcome. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who survived the acute phase of NORSE to the point of discharge from hospital, 9 had died at last follow-up, of whom 7 died within 6 months of discharge from the tertiary care center. The remaining 39 patients had high rates of active epilepsy as well as vocational, cognitive, and psychiatric comorbidities. The epilepsy was usually multifocal and typically drug resistant. Only a minority of patients had a good functional outcome. Therapeutic interventions were heterogenous during the acute phase of the illness. There was no clear relationship between the nature of treatment and clinical outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: Among survivors of cryptogenic NORSE, longer-term outcomes in most patients were life altering and often catastrophic. Treatment remains empirical and variable. There is a pressing need to understand the etiology of cryptogenic NORSE and to develop tailored treatment strategies.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus preceded by fever (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) versus without prior fever: An interim analysis.

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Second-line immunotherapy in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

Several pieces of evidence suggest immune dysregulation could trigger the onset and modulate sequelae of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Consensus-driven recommendations have been established to guide the initiation of first- and second-line immunotherapies in these patients. Here, we review the literature to date on second-line immunotherapy for NORSE/FIRES, presenting results from 28 case reports and series describing the use of anakinra, tocilizumab, or intrathecal dexamethasone in 75 patients with NORSE. Among them, 52 patients were managed with anakinra, 21 with tocilizumab, and eight with intrathecal dexamethasone. Most had elevated serum or cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels at treatment initiation. Treatments were predominantly initiated during the acute phase of the disease (92%) and resulted, within the first 2 weeks, in seizure control for up to 73% of patients with anakinra, 70% with tocilizumab, and 50% with intrathecal dexamethasone. Cytokine levels decreased after treatment for most patients. Anakinra and intrathecal dexamethasone were mainly initiated in children with FIRES, whereas tocilizumab was more frequently prescribed for adults, with or without a prior febrile infection. There was no clear correlation between the response to treatment and the time to initiate the treatment. Most patients experienced long-term disability and drug-resistant post-NORSE epilepsy. Initiation of second-line immunotherapies during status epilepticus (SE) had no clear effect on the emergence of post-NORSE epilepsy or long-term functional outcomes. In a small number of cases, the initiation of anakinra or tocilizumab several years after SE onset resulted in a reduction of seizure frequency for 67% of patients. These data highlight the potential utility of anakinra, tocilizumab, and intrathecal dexamethasone in patients with NORSE. There continues to be interest in the utilization of early cytokine measurements to guide treatment selection and response. Prospective studies are necessary to understand the role of early immunomodulation and its associations with epilepsy and functional outcomes.

Long-term outcome in new onset refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a neurologic emergency without an immediately identifiable cause. The complicated and long ICU stay of the patients can lead to perceiving a prolongation of therapies as futile. However, a recovery is possible even in severe cases. This retrospective study investigates ICU treatments, short- and long-term outcome and ethical decisions of a case series of patients with NORSE. METHODS: Overall, 283 adults were admitted with status epilepticus (SE) to the Neurocritical Care Unit of the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 01.2010 and 12.2022. Of them, 25 had a NORSE. We collected demographic, clinical, therapeutic and outcome data. Descriptive statistics was performed. RESULTS: Most patients were female (68%), previously healthy (Charlson comorbidity index 1 [0-4]) and relatively young (54 ± 17 years). 96% presented with super-refractory SE. Despite extensive workup, the majority (68%) of cases remained cryptogenic. Most patients had a long and complicated ICU stay. The in-hospital mortality was 36% (n = 9). The mortality at last available follow-up was 56% (n = 14) on average 30 months after ICU admission. The cause of in-hospital death for 89% (n = 8) of the patients was the withholding/withdrawing of therapies. Medical staff except for one patient triggered the decision. The end of life (EOL) decision was taken 29 [12-51] days after the ICU admission. Death occurred on day 6 [1-8.5] after the decision was taken. The functional outcome improved over time for 13/16 (81%) hospital survivors (median mRS at hospital discharge 4 [3.75-5] vs. median mRS at last available follow-up 2 [1.75-3], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the long-term outcome can still be favorable in NORSE survivors, despite a prolonged and complicated ICU stay. Clinicians should be careful in taking EOL decisions to avoid the risk of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Our results encourage clinicians to continue treatment even in initially refractory cases.

Communication trends over time in new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE): Interim analysis from the NORSE/FIRES Family Registry.

The new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE)/febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) Family Registry contributes to a systematic effort to collect clinical and epidemiological information on individuals affected by NORSE/FIRES. We explore diagnostic and prognostic information provided to patients and their families, their satisfaction with the communication, and utilisation of palliative care services during acute hospitalization. Communication about the diagnosis of NORSE/FIRES to families has improved since the publication of consensus definitions in 2018, with families being more likely to be told about NORSE/FIRES after 2018. Families rate the quality of prognostic information as being moderate. Palliative care services were involved in a minority of patients. Understanding and characterizing the prevalence and satisfaction of diagnostic and prognostic conversations is important for improving overall care, the quality of physician-patient-family relationships, and the recovery process for those affected by NORSE/FIRES.

Review and standard operating procedures for collection of biospecimens and analysis of biomarkers in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. The exact causes of NORSE are currently unknown, and there is so far no disease-specific therapy. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and discovering specific biomarkers, whether immunologic, infectious, genetic, or other, may help physicians in the management of patients with NORSE. A broad spectrum of biomarkers has been proposed for status epilepticus patients, some of which were evaluated for patients with NORSE. Nonetheless, none has been validated, due to significant variabilities in study cohorts, collected biospecimens, applied analytical methods, and defined outcome endpoints, and to small sample sizes. The NORSE Institute established an open NORSE/FIRES biorepository for health-related data and biological samples allowing the collection of biospecimens worldwide, promoting multicenter research and sharing of data and specimens. Here, we suggest standard operating procedures for biospecimen collection and biobanking in this rare condition. We also propose criteria for the appropriate use of previously collected biospecimens. We predict that the widespread use of standardized procedures will reduce heterogeneity, facilitate the future identification of validated biomarkers for NORSE, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and best clinical management for these patients.

Blood-brain barrier damage and new onset refractory status epilepticus: An exploratory study using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to characterize the blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction in patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). METHODS: This study included three groups of adult participants: patients with NORSE, encephalitis patients without status epilepticus (SE), and healthy subjects. These participants were retrospectively included from a prospective DCE-MRI database of neurocritically ill patients and healthy subjects. The BBB permeability (Ktrans) in the hippocampus, basal ganglia, thalamus, claustrum, periventricular white matter, and cerebellum were measured and compared between these three groups. RESULTS: A total of seven patients with NORSE, 14 encephalitis patients without SE, and nine healthy subjects were included in this study. Among seven patients with NORSE, only one had a definite etiology (autoimmune encephalitis), and the rest were cryptogenic. Etiology of encephalitis patients without SE included viral (n = 2), bacterial (n = 8), tuberculous (n = 1), cryptococcal (n = 1), and cryptic (n = 2) encephalitis. Of these 14 encephalitis patients without SE, three patients had seizures. Compared to healthy controls, NORSE patients had significantly increased Ktrans values in the hippocampus (.73 vs. .02 × 10-3 /min, p = .001) and basal ganglia (.61 vs. .003 × 10-3 /min, p = .007) and a trend in the thalamus (.24 vs. .08 × 10-3 /min, p = .017). Compared to encephalitis patients without SE, NORSE patients had significantly increased Ktrans values in the thalamus (.24 vs. .01 × 10-3 /min, p = .002) and basal ganglia (.61 vs. .004 × 10-3 /min, p = .013). SIGNIFICANCE: This exploratory study demonstrates that BBBs of NORSE patients were impaired diffusely, and BBB dysfunction in the basal ganglia and thalamus plays an important role in the pathophysiology of NORSE.

The seasonality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

The etiology of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as FIRES (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome), remains uncertain. Several arguments suggest that NORSE is a disorder of immunity, likely post-infectious. Consequently, seasonal occurrence might be anticipated. Herein we investigated if seasonality is a notable factor regarding NORSE presentation. We combined four different data sets with a total of 342 cases, all from the northern hemisphere, and 62% adults. The incidence of NORSE cases differed between seasons (p = .0068) and was highest in the summer (32.2%) (p = .0022) and lowest in the spring (19.0%, p = .010). Although both FIRES and non-FIRES cases occurred most commonly during the summer, there was a trend toward FIRES cases being more likely to occur in the winter than non-FIRES cases (OR 1.62, p = .071). The seasonality of NORSE cases differed according to the etiology (p = .024). NORSE cases eventually associated with autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis occurred most frequently in the summer (p = .032) and least frequently in the winter (p = .047), whereas there was no seasonality for cryptogenic cases. This study suggests that NORSE overall and NORSE related to autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis are more common in the summer, but that there is no definite seasonality in cryptogenic cases.

Surviving status epilepticus: The patient and family perspective.

Awareness of the long-term outcomes of status epilepticus is key to understanding the condition overall. Maintaining ties with patients' families is vital to both obtaining better long-term patient outcomes and obtaining that elusive data on long-term conditions. Common language and linked infrastructure support these ties. This position is posed within the context of NORSE (new-onset refractory status epilepticus) and FIRES (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome). This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Tofacitinib treatment for refractory autoimmune encephalitis.

To treat intractable cases of autoimmune encephalitis, the need for novel immunotherapy that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is increasing. Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor used to treat refractory immune-mediated diseases that effectively penetrates the BBB. Accordingly, tofacitinib could be a new option for patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis. Patients treated with tofacitinib were selected from Seoul National University Hospital cohort for autoimmune encephalitis from April 2019 until July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with autoimmune encephalitis who showed insufficient responses to multimodal conventional immunotherapies. Tofacitinib was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. A total of eight patients were treated with tofacitinib; two had good responses (clinical global impression-improvement score [CGI-I] = 1 or 2), three had partial responses (CGI-I = 3), and three showed no significant improvements (CGI-I = 4) in response to tofacitinib. The two good responders showed the improvement of chronic autoimmune meningoencephalitis and the cessation of the new-onset refractory status epilepticus in anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated disorder, which was previously intractable to anesthetics and the other immunotherapies. No patients had serious side effects. Our findings suggest the potential of tofacitinib as a therapeutic option for central nervous system autoimmune diseases.

Clinical presentation of new onset refractory status epilepticus in children (the pSERG cohort).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children, and investigated the relationship between fever onset and status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Patients with refractory SE (RSE) between June 1, 2011 and October 1, 2016 were prospectively enrolled in the pSERG (Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group) cohort. Cases meeting the definition of NORSE were classified as "NORSE of known etiology" or "NORSE of unknown etiology." Subgroup analysis of NORSE of unknown etiology was completed based on the presence and time of fever occurrence relative to RSE onset: fever at onset (≤24 h), previous fever (2 weeks-24 h), and without fever. RESULTS: Of 279 patients with RSE, 46 patients met the criteria for NORSE. The median age was 2.4 years, and 25 (54%) were female. Forty (87%) patients had NORSE of unknown etiology. Nineteen (48%) presented with fever at SE onset, 16 (40%) had a previous fever, and five (12%) had no fever. The patients with preceding fever had more prolonged SE and worse outcomes, and 25% recovered baseline neurological function. The patients with fever at onset were younger and had shorter SE episodes, and 89% recovered baseline function. SIGNIFICANCE: Among pediatric patients with RSE, 16% met diagnostic criteria for NORSE, including the subcategory of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Pediatric NORSE cases may also overlap with refractory febrile SE (FSE). FIRES occurs more frequently in older children, the course is usually prolonged, and outcomes are worse, as compared to refractory FSE. Fever occurring more than 24 h before the onset of seizures differentiates a subgroup of NORSE patients with distinctive clinical characteristics and worse outcomes.

Permanent loss of independence in adult febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors: an underestimated and unsolved challenge.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is an exceedingly rare and devastating subtype of new-onset refractory status epilepticus, which causes refractory epilepsy and permanent neurocognitive impairment. METHODS: This was a long-term follow-up of adult FIRES survivors treated between 2005 and 2018 as part of the EpiCARE initiative, a European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies. Clinical, electroencephalography, imaging and functional outcome measures are described using the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation, the modified Rankin Scale and the Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy Scale. RESULTS: Six patients with refractory epilepsy following FIRES were evaluated. Despite general improvement after intensive care unit discharge, disease severity was still high at follow-up in all patients. The functional outcome, as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, was moderately impaired in 2/6 patients. In contrast, the Scores of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation indicated a loss of independence in 5/6, serious problems in memory and planning/problem-solving in 4/6 and serious attentional problems in 3/6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome survivors may regain vital functions and mobility but experience a significant loss of independence and participation due to recurring seizures, structural brain damage and neurocognitive decline. Minimization of disastrous outcomes through the systematic evaluation of rescue therapies within a network of specialized centres is crucial.

A retrospective study of 92 children with new-onset refractory status epilepticus.

Little is known of the etiology, course, and treatment of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children. Here we identified etiologies, electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics, and neuroimaging findings among pediatric patients with NORSE and among two patient subgroups, febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) group and non-FIRES group. We also examined treatments and risk factors related to poor prognosis. Ninety-two children with NORSE were identified in Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 1, 2010 and September 1, 2020. The end date was chosen to guarantee at least a 6-month follow-up. Our results indicated that patients with FIRES account for 90% of pediatric patients with NORSE. The clinical, EEG, and neuroimaging results and prognosis were not significantly different between the FIRES group and non-FIRES group of individuals. 68.5% of our patients had unknown etiology, and viral etiology was the most common identified cause (26.1%). Electroencephalography might have a certain diagnostic value for NORSE. A gradual increase in seizure burden was obvious from the onset of disease, and continuous or recurrent ictal discharge lasting ≥ 30 min was quite common in our study. The mortality was 22.8% in our study. Among the 71 surviving patients, the outcome at discharge was poor but improved during follow-up, and 68.5% had good or fair outcomes at their last follow-up. A poor outcome was observed in 39 of 92 cases (42%), with 43.9% and 30% of individuals in the FIRES group and non-FIRES group, respectively, having a poor outcome. The presence of super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), electrographic seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and diffuse cortical edema and multifocal abnormality may be related to a poor prognosis. Our analysis did not indicate that prognosis was directly related to etiology or treatment. Management of NORSE is challenging, and the role of immunotherapy warrants further investigation.

Etiological assessment of status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a potentially serious condition that can affect vital and functional prognosis and requires urgent treatment. Etiology is a determining factor in the patient's functional outcome and in almost half of all cases justifies specific treatment to stop progression. Therefore, identifying and addressing the cause of SE is a key priority in SE management. However, the etiology can be difficult to identify among acute and remote causes, which can also be multiple and interrelated. The most common etiologies are the discontinuation of antiepileptic medication in patients with a prior history of epilepsy, and acute brain aggression in cases of new onset SE (cerebrovascular pathologies are the most common). The list of remaining possible etiologies includes heterogeneous pathological contexts. Refractory SE and especially New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) lead to an extension of the etiological assessment in the search for encephalitis of autoimmune or infectious origin in adults and in children, as well as a genetic pathology in children in particular. This is an overview of current knowledge of SE etiologies and a pragmatic approach for carrying out an etiological assessment based on the following steps: - Which etiological orientation is identified according to the field and clinical presentation?; - Which etiologies to look for in an inaugural SE?; - Which first-line assessment should be carried out? The place of the biological, EEG and imaging assessment is discussed; - Which etiologies to look for in case of refractory SE?

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): State of the art and perspectives.

We report the proceedings of the First International new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) Symposium. To promote awareness of this condition and foster research efforts, we conveyed the First International new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) Symposium. The conference was supported by The NORSE Institute (http://www.norseinstitute.org). This article summarizes the discussions that were held during the Symposium and presents our strategy to unravel the cause of these disorders and to improve patient care. The standardized definitions for these disorders that have been developed, are required to improve communication and facilitate the development of multicenter registries and biobanks. A distinction between childhood- and adult-onset forms of the syndrome is not supported by strong scientific evidence and it is argued that both should be studied together. Although the pathophysiology remains elusive, nascent evidence suggests a role for a postinfectious cytokine-mediated mechanism, which should be further investigated. It also appears important to develop tools for their early recognition and prompt treatment. Recent evidence suggests that specific electroencephalography (EEG) features might be helpful. The optimal treatment options remain to be determined; immune therapies are usually disappointing, but the ketogenic diet has proved effective in uncontrolled trials. NORSE and FIRES represent a very delicate clinical situation with specific communication issues between physicians and with patients and families. Standardized consensus definitions and a multidisciplinary multicenter strategy will help research efforts and improve clinical care for patients with NORSE and FIRES.

Proposed consensus definitions for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions.

We convened an international group of experts to standardize definitions of New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE), Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions. This was done to enable improved communication for investigators, physicians, families, patients, and other caregivers. Consensus definitions were achieved via email messages, phone calls, an in-person consensus conference, and collaborative manuscript preparation. Panel members were from 8 countries and included adult and pediatric experts in epilepsy, electroencephalography (EEG), and neurocritical care. The proposed consensus definitions are as follows: NORSE is a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurological disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus without a clear acute or active structural, toxic or metabolic cause. FIRES is a subcategory of NORSE, applicable for all ages, that requires a prior febrile infection starting between 2 weeks and 24 hours prior to onset of refractory status epilepticus, with or without fever at onset of status epilepticus. Proposed consensus definitions are also provided for Infantile Hemiconvulsion-Hemiplegia and Epilepsy syndrome (IHHE) and for prolonged, refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus. This document has been endorsed by the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium. We hope these consensus definitions will promote improved communication, permit multicenter research, and ultimately improve understanding and treatment of these conditions.

Treatment responsive GABA(B)-receptor limbic encephalitis presenting as new-onset super-refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in a deployed U.S. soldier.

A 23-year-old, previously healthy, deployed U.S. soldier presented with bilateral temporal lobe seizures recalcitrant to multiple antiepileptic drugs and anti-seizure anaesthetic agents. He received methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, and rituximab for presumed autoimmune encephalitis before achieving seizure freedom. Six weeks after presentation, the aetiology of his refractory seizures was found to be due to autoantibodies targeting the anti-GABA(B)-receptor. This case is noteworthy for being the first reported case of anti-GABA(B)-receptor limbic encephalitis presenting with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), a clinical syndrome that often carries a grave prognosis and in which a treatable aetiology is often never discovered. Our case also supports testing for GABA-receptor autoantibodies and the upfront use of multi-modal immunotherapy in patients presenting with limbic encephalitis and new refractory seizures.

IT-DEX and B cell depletion in a child with anti-GAD 65 autoimmune encephalitis presenting as NORSE: A case report.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a devastating clinical condition that often leads to severe disability. Intrathecal dexamethasone (IT-DEX) has been reported to improve refractory status epilepticus. We present an 11-year-old female with anti-GAD 65 encephalitis presenting as NORSE who had minimal response to standard anti-seizure medications and first-line immunotherapies. The patient received 6 doses of IT-DEX in conjunction with rituximab which correlated with subsequent decreased neuroinflammation, reduced seizure burden and aided in weaning anesthetic infusions. Our case with literature review suggests IT-DEX may be utilized as an early intervention in those with refractory status epilepticus from various etiologies.

New onset status epilepticus and its long-term outcome: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: New onset status epilepticus (NOSE), a subtype of status epilepticus, is a neurological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyze the phenotypic spectrum and outcomes of patients presenting with NOSE. METHODS: This prospective and retrospective descriptive study included patients presenting with NOSE over a 10-year period. Data collected included patient demographics, phenotypic characteristics of SE and its etiology, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), SE classification Axis-II, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission and discharge. Functional outcomes and seizure status were assessed at least 6 months post-discharge. Prognostic factors for mortality and the development of epilepsy were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were included, with a mean age of 41.97 ± 21.66 years, and a male predominance (57.1 %). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures were observed in 47.5 % of patients. The etiology was acute symptomatic in 35.57 % and remote symptomatic in 24 %. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 2.25-10.75 days). The mortality rate was 26.5 %, and 23 % of patients developed epilepsy with a median follow-up of 9 months. Higher age (≥ 50 years), elevated STESS, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, refractory status epilepticus (RSE), and new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) were significant risk factors for mortality (p<0.05). The development of epilepsy was associated with a higher number of antiseizure medications (ASM) at discharge, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, RSE, and NORSE (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: NOSE is a neurological emergency with a variable etiology and significant long-term consequences. Approximately one-fourth of patients presenting with NOSE died, and another quarter developed epilepsy during a median follow-up of 9 months. Identifying and addressing the predictors of mortality and epilepsy development following NOSE may improve long-term outcomes.