Socioeconomic Disparities Associated with Access to Oculofacial Plastic Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of US County Demographics.

PURPOSE: To compare population demographics with the geographic distribution of oculofacial plastic surgeons (OPSs) in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was used to investigate demographic differences between counties with 1 or more OPSs and counties with zero OPSs. PARTICIPANTS: The number of OPSs were identified in each US county using online public databases: American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Counties were categorized into 2 groups: 1 or more OPSs and zero OPSs. Demographic characteristics at the county level were obtained from the 2021 US Census Bureau Population Estimates and the American Community Survey. Cost of living was collected from the 2022 Economic Policy Institute Family Budget Calculator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Socioeconomic demographics of the US population as related to geographic OPS distribution. RESULTS: A total of 1238 OPSs were identified. States with the most OPSs per million were Hawaii (6.2), D.C. (6.0), Connecticut (5.8), Utah (5.1), and Maryland (5.0). Among 3143 counties, 2725 (86.7%) had zero OPSs and 418 (13.3%) had 1 or more OPSs. Counties with 1 or more OPSs had a higher median (standard deviation) household income versus counties with zero OPSs ($72 471 [$19 152] vs. $56 152 [$13 675]; difference $16 319; 95% confidence interval [CI], $14 300-$18 338; P < 0.001). The annual cost of living per person (standard deviation) was higher in counties with 1 or more OPSs versus counties with zero OPSs ($39 238 [$6992] vs. $36 227 [$3516]; difference $3011; 95% CI, $2328-$3694; P < 0.001). Counties with zero OPSs versus counties with 1 or more OPSs had higher proportions of persons with only Medicaid (15.6% vs. 13.6%; difference 2.0%; 95% CI, 1.4%-2.5%; P < 0.001), no health insurance (9.9% vs. 8.0%; difference 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.5%-2.4%; P < 0.001), no household internet access (17.2% vs. 9.6%; difference 7.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-8.0%; P < 0.001), and higher proportions of persons aged 65 years or older (20.0% vs. 17.0%; difference 3.0%; 95% CI, 2.5%-3.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional analysis of all US counties revealed socioeconomic disparities associated with access to OPSs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Is topical antibiotic use necessary to prevent surgical site infection following oculoplastic surgery?

PURPOSE: To assess whether oculoplastic surgeries can be performed without any topical and systemic antibiotics, in a "100% antibiotic free" fashion. METHOD: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study between November 2017 and December 2022. Patients who underwent an oculoplastic procedure were screened. Patients who received preoperative or postoperative systemic antibiotics were excluded. Intraoperative IV antibiotics were allowed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with local antibiotics ointments (LATB group) and those who were treated without local antibiotics ointments (LATB free group) postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI). The relationship between the use of local antibiotics and the occurrence of SSI was assessed using Fisher's exact test. The alpha risk was set to 5% and two-tailed tests were used. RESULTS: Among the 947 procedures included, 617 were included in the LATB group and 330 in the LATB free group. 853 and 80 procedures were classified Altemeier class 1 (clean) and class 2 (clean-contaminated) surgeries, respectively. Overall, 310 (32.73%) procedures were performed without any systemic nor topical antibiotics (100% antibiotic free fashion). SSI occured in four (4/617; 0.65%) and five (5/330; 1.52%) procedures in the LATB and LATB free group respectively, without any statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.290). A subgroup analysis was carried out by excluding the procedures performed under prophylactic intraoperative intravenous antibiotics and did not reveal any statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.144). All SSI patients were treated with systemic antibiotics with favorable outcomes. Postoperative wound dehiscence was the only risk factor associated with postoperative SSI (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that performing a "100% antibiotic free" oculoplastic surgery without systemic and topical antibiotics is reasonable in Altemeier class 1 and class 2 procedures.

Telemedicine in Oculoplastic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Center Experience.

Purpose: To investigate patterns in oculoplastic surgery telemedicine visits at our institution during the pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients who had a virtual consultation with the oculoplastic surgery service at Mayo Clinic Rochester between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021. Results: There were a total of 148 patients. Mean age was 65 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62-68). The mean driving distance to the medical center was 468 kilometers (95% CI: 352-586) and 15 (10%) patients came from states with no practicing American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) members. Out of the 205 virtual visits, 35 (17%) were new, 45 (22%) were return, and 125 (61%) were postoperative. Conversion rate to surgery was 60%. A comparison between type of virtual visits (new vs. return vs. postoperative) revealed that a diagnosis of eyelid malposition was most frequent in postoperative visits (p = < 0.001), skin malignancy was most frequent in new visits (p = 0.009), and orbital tumors (p = 0.018) and thyroid eye disease (p = < 0.001) were most frequent in return visits. Most virtual encounters had supportive media attached including external photographs in 127 (62%) visits and other imaging or testing in 18 (9%) visits. The average virtual visit lasted 18 min (95% CI: 14-22) with technical difficulties noted in 9 (4%) visits. Unanticipated conversion to in-person visits was noted in three (1%) cases. Conclusions: A wide range of oculoplastic surgery conditions was managed virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilization of initial virtual visit versus follow-up care varied by diagnosis. Virtual visits may improve access to oculoplastic subspecialty care for patients from underserved areas.

Gonococcal dacryoadenitis complicated by orbital cellulitis: a case report.

Gonococcal dacryoadenitis is uncommon, and its diagnosis may be delayed especially if there is a low index of clinical suspicion. Making an early diagnosis is extremely important because in some cases the organism may spread contiguously, leading to vision-threatening sequelae such as corneal perforation. The authors present a case report of a patient diagnosed with gonococcal dacryoadenitis complicated by orbital cellulitis. Our case demonstrates that in all cases of purulent dacryoadenitis, urgent evaluation, cultures and treatment is crucial, and it is prudent to consider gonococcal dacryoadenitis as a rare but possible differential in patients who are sexually active with an unexplained cause for dacryoadenitis.

Surgical reconstruction of medial eyelid defects using margin transposition, tarsal graft, and periosteal strip.

PURPOSE: Surgical reconstruction of medially located lower eyelid defects can be challenging. The Hughes procedure, considered the standard for reconstruction in such cases, often falls short in terms of cosmetic outcomes. An alternative approach that combines medial transposition with a tarsal graft and periosteal strip has shown promise. Here, we aim to demonstrate the cosmetic advantages of medial transposition of a preserved temporal lower eyelid over other techniques. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study involving seven well-documented patients who underwent the procedure described below. The study was approved by the University's Ethics Committee. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for one year. Lower eyelid defects spanned 50-80% of their total length, situated in the central third of the eyelid or the central to medial portion. Postoperative complications were minimal, with all patients exhibiting good cosmetic, functional, and anatomical outcomes at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The absence of eyelashes is well tolerated if it is lateral, but when the defect is medial, medial transposition could be a good alternative to the familiar Hughes surgical intervention.

The effect of traction force on eyelid blood perfusion during closure of defects.

PURPOSE: In oculoplastic surgery the eyelid tissue is frequently stretched in order to repair defects after tumor surgery. However, there is a paucity of research regarding how stretching affects eyelids. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into how traction force affects eyelid stretch as well as tissue perfusion, using a laser-based in vivo monitoring technique. METHOD: Lower-lid pentagonal resections were performed in eight patients and a total of nine eyelids. The medial section of the eyelid was then stretched using a dynamometer up to a force of 2.3 Newtons (N), and eyelid stretching and blood perfusion were continuously measured using laser speckle contrast imaging. RESULTS: Tissue perfusion decreased exponentially when eyelid tissue was stretched, with an initial sharp decline followed by a more gradual reduction. Perfusion approached zero at a force of approximately 2.0 N. The length of the eyelid increased with increasing force up to 1.5 N, after which there was only a very slight increase in length. CONCLUSIONS: Eyelid tissue seems to respond to traction in a non-linear fashion, where the initial force results in the greatest eyelid stretching and reduction in blood perfusion. The results provide information on the effects of a large force for direct closure of large eyelid defects. Considering how quickly perfusion approaches zero, the high success rate of eyelid reconstruction surgery is likely a testament to the extensive vascularization of the periocular region.

Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Orbital Plastic Surgery and Its Relationship with the Use of Social Media.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in the general population ranges from 0.7 to 2.4%; however, higher rates are seen among aesthetic patients. Given the recent rise in popularity of cosmetic surgery, particularly in the post-COVID pandemic setting, the authors hypothesize the prevalence has increased. The purpose of the study is to examine the prevalence of BDD in patients presenting to an oculoplastic surgery clinic at an academic center and determine correlation with social media use. METHODS: This is a survey of patients presenting to the oculoplastic surgery clinic. Participants completed the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ), in addition to survey questions about social media use. Main outcomes included a positive screen and social media use. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients that presented to the oculoplastic and reconstructive surgery clinic were surveyed. All patients, including cosmetic, functional, and non-surgical, were offered participation in the survey. 9.13% of all patients screened positive for BDD. Patients that screened positive were more commonly female (71.43%). The distribution of patients with BDD was even between Hispanics (52.38%) and non-Hispanics, and 85.71% of patients with BDD were Caucasian. Of patients that screened positive, 71.43% use social media. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BDD may have increased in the past seven years and is seen most in females and Caucasians. There is a positive correlation with social media, which has increased in popularity since the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to maintain a high clinical suspicion for BDD and consider screening if there is concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Eyelid atypical fibroxanthoma: a rare challenging entity.

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare neoplasm, with a limited number of cases reported in the periocular region. In this case report, we detail a 63-year-old woman who presented with a polypoid, exophytic lesion on her right upper eyelid that had been progressing for a year. The lesion was meticulously excised with security margins and reconstructed using a glabellar flap. Following a thorough microscopic and immunohistochemical analysis, AFX was diagnosed. Despite its sometimes clinical and histological benign appearance, AFX is classified as a malignant neoplasm; however, it carries an excellent prognosis with low metastasis and recurrence rates. Complete excision with safety margins is essential and an adequate post-operative surveillance is recommended. Owing to its rarity, ophthalmologists should remain vigilant and include AFX in their differential diagnosis, as the tumor's benign appearance may lead to misdiagnosis of this malignant entity.

Longitudinal trends in volume of oculoplastic procedures without ACGME minimum requirements among United States ophthalmology residents: an ACGME case log analysis.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports that investigate trends in ophthalmology residents' exposure to oculoplastic procedures without Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) minimum requirements. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated publicly available ACGME ophthalmology residency case logs from 2009 to 2021. METHODS: National resident averages and standard deviations were collected for the following oculoplastic procedures without minimum ACGME requirements: eye removal and implant, lacrimal surgery, other orbital surgery (e.g. orbitotomy), tarsorrhaphy, entropion/ectropion repair, temporal artery biopsy, and other oculoplastic surgery. We also collated average yearly surgical volumes of all oculoplastic procedures, "Total Oculoplastic Surgery," which includes procedures with minimum requirements and procedures without requirements. Finally, we collected the average yearly volumes of all ophthalmic procedures. Linear regressions were used to characterize trends in resident oculoplastic surgical volume. RESULTS: We provide evidence that the average yearly volumes of all but one oculoplastic procedure without ACGME minimum requirements have been decreasing. The decreases in volume for these procedures are driven by residents having fewer cases both as primary surgeon and as assistant. In addition, while the total number of ophthalmic procedures logged by residents on average increased (ß = 7.519, p = 0.0163), the average volume of total oculoplastic procedures did not demonstrate any statistically significant trends. CONCLUSIONS: Volumes of oculoplastic procedures without ACGME minimum requirements between 2009 and 2021 have been decreasing among ophthalmology residents.

Novel use of an autologous scleral button graft to close the anterior defect in evisceration surgery.

PURPOSE: To present an alternative evisceration technique with long-term follow-up data. This technique involves the insertion of an acrylic implant into a modified scleral shell which is closed using an autologous scleral graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of eviscerations performed in a district-general hospital in the UK. All patients underwent conventional ocular evisceration after total keratectomy. A full thickness scleral graft is harvested from the posterior sclera, using an internal approach, with an 8 mm dermatological punch. An 18-20 mm acrylic implant is placed into the shell, and the scleral graft is used to close the anterior defect. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, and cosmetic results from pictures of all patients were recorded. All patients were invited for a review to measure motility, eyelid height, patient recorded satisfaction and complications. RESULTS: Of the five patients identified, one had since died. The remaining four attended a review in person. The mean time between surgery and review was 48 months. The mean implant size was 19 mm. There were no cases of implant extrusion or infection. All four had a <1 mm asymmetry in measured eyelid height and ≥5 mm horizontal gaze motility. All patients self-reported "good" cosmesis. An independent assessment identified "mild asymmetry" in two cases and "moderate" in the other two. CONCLUSION: Evisceration with this novel autologous scleral graft technique restores volume in the anterior orbit with good cosmetic results, and with no cases of implant exposure reported in this small case series. This technique should be compared prospectively to established techniques.

Factors associated with appointment 'no-shows' at two tertiary level outpatient oculoplastic clinics.

PURPOSE: Appointment no-shows in clinics can adversely impact patients and physicians alike. This study aimed to determine the rate and potential causes of missed appointments in oculoplastic clinics and compare a private practice and hospital-based academic setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who booked appointments for oculoplastic consultation, between August 2019 and January 2020 at two oculoplastic clinics was performed. Demographic and patient-specific characteristics of patients who failed to attend their appointment were identified. Data were analysed to determine and compare the no-show rates in both clinics and logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with them. RESULTS: The rate of missed appointments was 3% and 17% at the oculoplastic clinics of Lions Eye Institute (LEI, private practice) and Albany Medical Center (AMC, academic hospital-based office), respectively. Patients at the AMC clinic were more likely to be male, younger, have a lower household income, not carry private insurance, and suffer from trauma. Logistic regression analysis showed lower patient age to significantly increase the likelihood of no-shows in both clinics (p = .01 for LEI, p = .003 for AMC), and lead appointment time greater than 90 days to be a significant risk factor for no-shows at LEI (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The no-show rate for oculoplastic appointments is 3% and 17% at LEI and AMC clinics, respectively. Our analysis shows that younger patients are more likely to miss appointments at both clinics, and an appointment lead time greater than 90 days is a significant risk factor for no-shows at LEI.

Per-operative COVID-19 modifications for oculoplastic service: patients perspective and regional review of practice of a protective draping technique.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has posed problems for oculoplastic surgeons. One issue we felt needed to be addressed was the way patients are draped for surgery. Traditionally patients are draped with their full face exposed, and as a result, aerosols generated from both the patient and surgical team put the other party at risk. METHODS: We created a new draping technique which would create a physical barrier. A regional survey was undertaken to compare regional oculoplastic draping practices with our practice locally in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. A patient satisfaction survey was also completed to understand the impact of our change in practice. RESULTS: Our regional survey generated 22 consultant responses. 36% (8) continued with their normal practice with the full face exposed. 18% (4) of the responders had modified a cataract drape and 45% (10) used a bespoke drape with or without a mask. We started using this modified drape in June 2020 and in the patient survey, 100 percent of patients felt the drape was comfortable and 30% of the patients commented on the relief that they did not have to wear a face mask during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our draping technique provides an alternative to the traditional full face exposure draping. It is simple, inexpensive, and readily available. It also addresses and resolves the issue of safety of the oculoplastic surgeon and surgical team whilst maintaining comfort for the patient throughout, particularly when risks the of COVID are ongoing and with the potential of more viruses in the future.

Opioid prescribing patterns among oculofacial plastic surgeons.

PURPOSE: Oculofacial plastic surgeons (OPS) prescribe narcotic pain prescriptions at a rate four times higher than that of other ophthalmologists. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand trends in opioid prescriptions among oculofacial plastic surgeons after common oculoplastic surgeries. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was sent to OPS in the USA between June 19, 2020 and December 1, 2020. Participants were asked about their training and practice as well as their top two choices for post-operative pain management both overall and for seven common oculoplastic surgeries. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were performed to analyze relationships between categorical variables. RESULTS: The two most common opioid medications, in percentage of respondents (n = 82), prescribed overall by OPS were hydrocodone-acetaminophen (35%) and tramadol (21%). Between OPS completed training before 1990 (16%) and those who completed training from 1991 to 2000 (12%), the latter cohort is 4.9 times more likely to prescribe opioids overall ([95% CI = 1.3-15.4], p = .01). Additionally, OPS who are currently practicing in the Southeast USA are 4.2 times more likely to prescribe opioids overall than those practicing in the Northeast USA ([95% CI: 1.4-12.8], p = .02). CONCLUSION: This study has helped identify patterns in opioid prescribing behavior among OPS based on demographic information and common oculoplastic surgeries. This knowledge will help bring awareness of prescribing behavior to the oculoplastics community and identify areas of improvement to reduce opioid prescriptions. Kindly check and confirm the OD and ON has been correctly identified in 2nd affiliationYes.

Anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery: an educational review.

PURPOSE: Selecting an anesthetic agent for ophthalmic surgery has crucial implications for the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and patient. This educational review explores the common classes of anesthesia used in ophthalmology. Additionally, we discuss the considerations unique to cataract, glaucoma, strabismus, orbital, oculoplastic, and ocular trauma surgeries. METHODS: A comprehensive Embase search was performed using combinations of the subject headings "anesthesia", "eye surgery", "ophthalmology" and "cataract extraction", "glaucoma", "strabismus", "vitreoretinal surgery", "retina surgery", "eye injury", and "eyelid reconstruction". RESULTS: Topical anesthetics are the most commonly used form of ocular anesthesia, used in both an office and surgical setting, and carry a minimal side effect profile. Notably, topical anesthetics offer analgesia, but do not provide akinesia or amnesia. Regional blocks, such as are sub-Tenon's, peribulbar, and retrobulbar blocks, are used when akinesia is required in addition to analgesia. Recently, sub-Tenon's blocks have recently gained popularity due to their improved safety profile compared to other regional blocks. General anesthesia is considered for long, complex surgery, surgery in patients with multiple comorbidities, surgery in young pediatric patients, or surgery in patients intolerant to local or regional anesthetic. CONCLUSION: Anesthetizing the eye has rapidly evolved in recent years, supporting the safety, efficacy and comfort of ocular surgery. Since there are many viable options of anesthetics available for ophthalmic surgery, a robust understanding of the patients needs, the skill of the surgical team, and surgery-specific factors ought to be considered when creating an anesthetic plan for surgery.

Revision orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications, surgical techniques and outcomes for revision orbital decompression surgery for thyroid eye disease in open, endoscopic, and combined open and endoscopic approaches. METHODS: A retrospective review of all revision orbital decompression procedures for thyroid eye disease from a single large academic institution over a 17-year period (01/01/2004-01/01/2021) was performed. Patient demographics, as well as indications and types of surgery were reviewed. Outcome measures included changes in proptosis, intraocular pressure, visual acuity and diplopia. RESULTS: Thirty procedures were performed on 21 patients. There was a median of 9.4 months between primary orbital decompression and revision decompression surgery. There were 6 bilateral procedures, and 2 of these patients underwent additional revision surgeries due to decreased visual acuity with concern for persistent orbital apex compression or sight-threatening ocular surface exposure in the setting of proptosis. Twenty-five procedures were performed as open surgeries with 5 endoscopic/combined cases. Combined Ophthalmology/Otolaryngology surgery via combined open/endoscopic approaches was favoured for persistent orbital apex disease. Visual acuity remained preserved in all patients. The overall median reduction in proptosis was 2 mm and intraocular pressure change was 1 mmHg regardless of surgical approach. The overall rate of new onset diplopia after surgery was 15%. These patients had open approaches. All endoscopic/combined approach patients had pre-existing diplopia. There were no statistically significant differences between the open and endoscopic/combined groups in regard to change in visual acuity, reduction in proptosis or intraocular pressure. CONCLUSION: Revision orbital decompression is an uncommon procedure indicated for those patients with progressive symptoms despite previous surgery and intensive medical management. Both endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques offer favourable outcomes with respect to visual acuity, decrease in intraocular pressure, and improvement in proptosis and overall lead to a low incidence of new onset diplopia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The use of mobile devices in oculoplastic and oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of smartphones in the United States has more than doubled since 2011. Mobile phone applications have versatile functions in ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery, such as increasing patient engagement in treatment, decreasing no-shows to appointments, and providing patient education. They also provide practical advantages to the clinician, including supplementing an otoscope, laryngoscope, or ophthalmoscope. Their use in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) and oculoplastic surgery has shown effectiveness for a variety of applications, such as for photography and medical reference. Research suggests that smartphones may improve clinical outcomes and efficiency. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date systematic review of the available literature investigating mobile phone use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS. METHODS: A query of terms relevant to oculoplastic surgery and OMFS was conducted using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsychINFO to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria that investigated the implementation, efficacy, and outcomes of mobile device use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS. A qualitative summary and discussion of the literature was subsequently synthesized. RESULTS: Out of a total of 289 articles reviewed, 171 were removed due to duplication across the four databases. Of the 118 studies remaining, 19 of them were included within the final qualitative review after screening the abstracts and full text for relevance. The articles were published between 2005 and 2020 from 7 different countries. Review of the relevant articles showed three settings in which mobile devices were used: communication between providers, communication between providers and patients, and as surgical supplementation. The literature review included use of mobile device photography for quality improvement, visual representation of procedures for patient education, and improved communication amongst providers and patients in the setting of oculoplastics and OMFS. CONCLUSION: Mobile device use has become ubiquitous across cultures worldwide. The literature suggests that mobile phone use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS may improve clinical practice in multiple settings. However, further investigation is necessary to quantify the clinical benefits of mobile device use in oculoplastic and oral and maxillofacial surgery.

A Simple Way to Apply Moisture Chamber Eyeglasses During Oculoplastic Surgery.

Proper eyelid closure and a normal blink reflex are essential to maintain a stable tear film and a healthy corneal surface. We present a simple technique to apply moisture chamber eyeglasses after oculoplastic surgery. The Opti-Gard® protective eyewear is faster, easily applicable and well performing. It can be used with different face shape, and it does not require any additional trimming or modification. This technical note explains a very simple, economical and less time-consuming method to prevent a postoperative dry keratoconjunctivitis. It may be applied to all procedures within the field of ophthalmic surgery, including oculoplastic surgery.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Changes in Tear Meniscus Analysis After Ptosis Procedure and Upper Blepharoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: To quantitatively evaluate dry eye test and tear measurements following oculoplastic surgery. METHODS: This comparative prospective clinical study comprised three groups of adult patients: the 1) blepharoplasty group: those with dermatochalasis; and 2) the blepharoplasty + Muller's muscle-conjunctival resection and 3) blepharoplasty + anterior levator resection groups: those with dermatochalasis and ptosis showing significant improvement after 10% phenylephrine administration. Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear film break-up time, corneal staining, and Schirmer test values were recorded. Tear meniscus area and height were measured using anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: This study comprised 56 patients (18 males, 38 females). The blepharoplasty group included 40 eyes of 20 patients. The blepharoplasty + MMCR group included 21 eyes of 16 patients. The blepharoplasty + ALR group included 30 eyes of 20 patients. No significant differences resulted between the preoperative and postoperative dry eye test and tear measurements in the blepharoplasty group (P> 0.005/for all). Significant increases were seen in the corneal staining, TMH, TMA, and Schirmer test values were significantly decreased compared to those postoperatively in the blepharoplasty + MMCR group (P= 0.018, P< 0.001, P= 0.033 and P= 0.030, respectively). In the blepharoplasty + ALR group, the TMH and TMA were significantly decreased (P= 0.031, P= 0.036). CONCLUSION: No changes resulted in dry eye tests following blepharoplasty in patients without dry eye symptoms. Changes were more pronounced following ptosis surgery, especially MMCR. Patients should be carefully examined for dry eye and treated during follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Using infodemiology metrics to assess patient demand for oculoplastic surgeons in the United States: insights from Google Search Trends.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare state-by-state concentrations of oculoplastic surgeons against patient demand using Google Search Trends data, in order to identify potential areas of unmet need. METHODS: Google Trends data from 2004 to 2019 was collected to determine relative search volumes for the keyword "blepharoplasty" in each US state and the District of Columbia. Oculoplastic surgeon density was calculated by dividing the number of active American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members in 2019 by the State Census Bureau population estimates. Relative search volume values were divided by the local concentration of surgeons, and results were normalized between 0 and 100 to obtain a relative demand index for each state. RESULTS: Oculoplastic surgeon density varied widely across the country. The greatest concentrations of surgeons per 100,000 people were in D.C. (0.708) and Rhode Island (0.378), while the lowest were in Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming (all 0). Relative search volumes were tightly distributed, ranging between 100 (Hawaii) and 45 (Vermont). The highest relative demand was found in low surgeon density states, such as Hawaii, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. The lowest relative demand was found in DC (5), Rhode Island (12), and Utah (12). CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed vast disparities in surgical concentrations across the US and highlighted a number of areas with a relative undersupply of oculoplastic surgeons. Further investigation is necessary to examine the underlying factors impacting the supply and distribution of oculoplastic surgeons.

Postoperative systemic antibiotic usage in elective eyelid surgery: is it really necessary?

PURPOSE: The use of prophylactic antibiotics for oculoplastic procedures varies because of a lack of specific guidelines or literature. Comparable studies in clean orbital surgery have shown no proven benefit and its indiscriminate use has been linked to individual harm and rising levels of resistance. We investigated whether avoidance of systemic prophylactic antibiotics in elective lid surgeries increased surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: We conducted a case-note audit of consecutive anterior ptosis repair and lateral tarsal strip (LTS) surgeries performed with post-operative oral antibiotics (co-amoxiclav or clarithromycin) and topical chloramphenicol ointment, compared to only topical antibiotics. Data on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, age and incidence of surgical site infection at 2 weeks follow-up were collected. RESULTS: Of a cohort of 232 patients, 99 patients had combined systemic and topical antibiotics (ptosis n = 49, LTS n = 50) and 133 had topical antibiotics (ptosis n = 83, LTS n = 50). The groups were not significantly different for age (p = .6, t-test) or ASA status (p = .7, chi2 test). Three patients from the combined group required further treatment for SSI compared with two patients from the topical antibiotic group (p = .7 Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis for LTS and anterior ptosis repair procedures was not associated with increased SSI rates. Given that prescriptions of antibiotics carry the risk of side-effects and growing antimicrobial resistance, we feel that our study shows that its routine use in this setting is of no benefit.