IRF8 Regulates Transcription of Naips for NLRC4 Inflammasome Activation.

Inflammasome activation is critical for host defenses against various microbial infections. Activation of the NLRC4 inflammasome requires detection of flagellin or type III secretion system (T3SS) components by NLR family apoptosis inhibitory proteins (NAIPs); yet how this pathway is regulated is unknown. Here, we found that interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) is required for optimal activation of the NLRC4 inflammasome in bone-marrow-derived macrophages infected with Salmonella Typhimurium, Burkholderia thailandensis, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa but is dispensable for activation of the canonical and non-canonical NLRP3, AIM2, and Pyrin inflammasomes. IRF8 governs the transcription of Naips to allow detection of flagellin or T3SS proteins to mediate NLRC4 inflammasome activation. Furthermore, we found that IRF8 confers protection against bacterial infection in vivo, owing to its role in inflammasome-dependent cytokine production and pyroptosis. Altogether, our findings suggest that IRF8 is a critical regulator of NAIPs and NLRC4 inflammasome activation for defense against bacterial infection.

Transcription factors TCF-1 and GATA3 are key factors for the epigenetic priming of early innate lymphoid progenitors toward distinct cell fates.

The differentiation of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) from hematopoietic stem cells needs to go through several multipotent progenitor stages. However, it remains unclear whether the fates of multipotent progenitors are predefined by epigenetic states. Here, we report the identification of distinct accessible chromatin regions in all lymphoid progenitors (ALPs), EILPs, and ILC precursors (ILCPs). Single-cell MNase-seq analyses revealed that EILPs contained distinct subpopulations epigenetically primed toward either dendritic cell lineages or ILC lineages. We found that TCF-1 and GATA3 co-bound to the lineage-defining sites for ILCs (LDS-Is), whereas PU.1 binding was enriched in the LDSs for alternative dendritic cells (LDS-As). TCF-1 and GATA3 were indispensable for the epigenetic priming of LDSs at the EILP stage. Our results suggest that the multipotency of progenitor cells is defined by the existence of a heterogeneous population of cells epigenetically primed for distinct downstream lineages, which are regulated by key transcription factors.

Exploiting dynamic enhancer landscapes to decode macrophage and microglia phenotypes in health and disease.

The development and functional potential of metazoan cells is dependent on combinatorial roles of transcriptional enhancers and promoters. Macrophages provide exceptionally powerful model systems for investigation of mechanisms underlying the activation of cell-specific enhancers that drive transitions in cell fate and cell state. Here, we review recent advances that have expanded appreciation of the diversity of macrophage phenotypes in health and disease, emphasizing studies of liver, adipose tissue, and brain macrophages as paradigms for other tissue macrophages and cell types. Studies of normal tissue-resident macrophages and macrophages associated with cirrhosis, obese adipose tissue, and neurodegenerative disease illustrate the major roles of tissue environment in remodeling enhancer landscapes to specify the development and functions of distinct macrophage phenotypes. We discuss the utility of quantitative analysis of environment-dependent changes in enhancer activity states as an approach to discovery of regulatory transcription factors and upstream signaling pathways.

Accelerated plasma-cell differentiation in Bach2-deficient mouse B cells is caused by altered IRF4 functions.

Transcription factors BACH2 and IRF4 are both essential for antibody class-switch recombination (CSR) in activated B lymphocytes, while they oppositely regulate the differentiation of plasma cells (PCs). Here, we investigated how BACH2 and IRF4 interact during CSR and plasma-cell differentiation. We found that BACH2 organizes heterochromatin formation of target gene loci in mouse splenic B cells, including targets of IRF4 activation such as Aicda, an inducer of CSR, and Prdm1, a master plasma-cell regulator. Release of these gene loci from heterochromatin in response to B-cell receptor stimulation was coupled to AKT-mTOR pathway activation. In Bach2-deficient B cells, PC genes' activation depended on IRF4 protein accumulation, without an increase in Irf4 mRNA. Mechanistically, a PU.1-IRF4 heterodimer in activated B cells promoted BACH2 function by inducing gene expression of Bach2 and Pten, a negative regulator of AKT signaling. Elevated AKT activity in Bach2-deficient B cells resulted in IRF4 protein accumulation. Thus, BACH2 and IRF4 mutually modulate the activity of each other, and BACH2 inhibits PC differentiation by both the repression of PC genes and the restriction of IRF4 protein accumulation.

Transcription Factor PU.1 Promotes Conventional Dendritic Cell Identity and Function via Induction of Transcriptional Regulator DC-SCRIPT.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are can be broadly divided into conventional (cDC) and plasmacytoid (pDC) subsets. Despite the importance of this lineage diversity, its genetic basis is not fully understood. We found that conditional ablation of the Ets-family transcription factor PU.1 in DC-restricted progenitors led to increased pDC production at the expense of cDCs. PU.1 controlled many of the cardinal functions of DCs, such as antigen presentation by cDCs and type I interferon production by pDCs. Conditional ablation of PU.1 de-repressed the pDC transcriptional signature in cDCs. The combination of genome-wide mapping of PU.1 binding and gene expression analysis revealed a key role for PU.1 in maintaining cDC identity through the induction of the transcriptional regulator DC-SCRIPT. PU.1 activated DC-SCRIPT expression, which in turn promoted cDC formation, particularly of cDC1s, and repressed pDC development. Thus, cDC identity is regulated by a transcriptional node requiring PU.1 and DC-SCRIPT.

Structural Features of Transcription Factors Associating with Nucleosome Binding.

Fate-changing transcription factors (TFs) scan chromatin to initiate new genetic programs during cell differentiation and reprogramming. Yet the protein structure domains that allow TFs to target nucleosomal DNA remain unexplored. We screened diverse TFs for binding to nucleosomes containing motif-enriched sequences targeted by pioneer factors in vivo. FOXA1, OCT4, ASCL1/E12α, PU1, CEBPα, and ZELDA display a range of nucleosome binding affinities that correlate with their cell reprogramming potential. We further screened 593 full-length human TFs on protein microarrays against different nucleosome sequences, followed by confirmation in solution, to distinguish among factors that bound nucleosomes, such as the neuronal AP-2α/ß/γ, versus factors that only bound free DNA. Structural comparisons of DNA binding domains revealed that efficient nucleosome binders use short anchoring α helices to bind DNA, whereas weak nucleosome binders use unstructured regions and/or ß sheets. Thus, specific modes of DNA interaction allow nucleosome scanning that confers pioneer activity to transcription factors.

Upregulation of nuclear protein Hemgn by transcriptional repressor Gfi1 through repressing PU.1 contributes to the anti-apoptotic activity of Gfi1.

Gfi1 is a transcriptional repressor that plays a critical role in hematopoiesis. The repressive activity of Gfi1 is mediated mainly by its SNAG domain that interacts with and thereby recruits the histone demethylase LSD1 to its target genes. An important function of Gfi1 is to protect hematopoietic cells against stress-induced apoptosis, which has been attributed to its participation in the posttranscriptional modifications of p53 protein, leading to suppression of p53 activity. In this study, we show that Gfi1 upregulated the expression of Hemgn, a nuclear protein, through a 16-bp promoter region spanning from +47 to +63 bp relative to the transcription start site (TSS), which was dependent on its interaction with LSD1. We further demonstrate that Gfi1, Ikaros and PU.1 bound to this 16-bp region. However, while Ikaros activated Hemgn and collaborated with Gfi1 to augment Hemgn expression, it was not required for Gfi1-mediated Hemgn upregulation. In contrast, PU.1 repressed Hemgn and inhibited Hemgn upregulation by Gfi1. Notably, PU.1 knockdown and deficiency, while augmenting Hemgn expression, abolished Hemgn upregulation by Gfi1. PU.1 (Spi-1) has been shown to be repressed by Gfi1. We show here that PU.1 repression by Gfi1 preceded and correlated well with Hemgn upregulation. Thus, our date strongly suggest that Gfi1 upregulates Hemgn by repressing PU.1. In addition, we demonstrate that Hemgn upregulation contributed to the anti-apoptotic activity of Gfi1 in a p53-independent manner.

Transcriptional regulation of the HIV-1 inhibitory factor human mannose receptor 1 by the myeloid-specific transcription factor PU.1.

HIV-1 infection of human macrophages leads to the downmodulation of human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1), a cell-surface glycoprotein that is involved in the host innate immune response. We previously reported that downmodulation of hMRC1 involves the transactivator of transcription (Tat)-dependent transcriptional silencing of the hMRC1 promoter. However, the inhibitory effect of Tat on hMRC1 transcription was indirect and involved inhibition of the transcriptional activator PU.1, which normally upregulates hMRC1 expression in macrophages and other myeloid cells. We cloned a 284-bp fragment of the hMRC1 promoter, and within it, we identified four PU.1 box elements. We assessed the relative contribution of each of the four PU.1 boxes to PU.1-dependent transcriptional regulation and, surprisingly, found that only one of the four PU.1 boxes [PU.1(b)] was critically required for PU.1-mediated upregulation of luciferase expression. Transfer of this PU.1 box to a heterologous promoter conferred PU.1 responsiveness to an otherwise PU.1 insensitive promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays identified this PU.1 box as a direct binding site for PU.1 both in the context of the hMRC1 promoter and the heterologous promoter. Furthermore, mutational analysis of the PU.1 protein identified the C-terminal DNA-binding domain in PU.1 as the region responsible for interaction with the PU.1 box. Recombinant HIV-1 Tat protein did not bind to the hMRC1 promoter element but efficiently interfered with the binding of PU.1 protein to the hMRC1 promoter. Thus, Tat is likely to inhibit the formation of active PU.1 transcription complexes, presumably by binding to and depleting common transcriptional cofactors.IMPORTANCEHIV-1 infection of cells results in the modulation of cellular gene expression by virus-encoded proteins in a manner that benefits the virus. We reported that HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) dysregulates the expression of the human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1). hMRC1 is involved in the innate immune response of macrophages to foreign pathogens. Tat does not act directly on the hMRC1 promoter but instead inhibits PU.1, a cellular transcription factor regulating hMRC1 gene expression. Here, we characterize the PU.1-dependent regulation of hMRC1 expression. We identified four potential PU.1 binding sites in the hMRC1 promoter region but found that only one, PU.1(b), functioned as a true binding site for PU.1. Transfer of the PU.1(b) box to a heterologous promoter did not activate this promoter per se but rendered it responsive to PU.1. Our results support the view that PU.1 acts as a transcriptional co-factor whose activity can be regulated by HIV-1 Tat.

The Heterogeneity of Ly6Chi Monocytes Controls Their Differentiation into iNOS+ Macrophages or Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells.

Inflammation triggers the differentiation of Ly6Chi monocytes into microbicidal macrophages or monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs). Yet, it is unclear whether environmental inflammatory cues control the polarization of monocytes toward each of these fates or whether specialized monocyte progenitor subsets exist before inflammation. Here, we have shown that naive monocytes are phenotypically heterogeneous and contain an NR4A1- and Flt3L-independent, CCR2-dependent, Flt3+CD11c-MHCII+PU.1hi subset. This subset acted as a precursor for FcγRIII+PD-L2+CD209a+, GM-CSF-dependent moDCs but was distal from the DC lineage, as shown by fate-mapping experiments using Zbtb46. By contrast, Flt3-CD11c-MHCII-PU.1lo monocytes differentiated into FcγRIII+PD-L2-CD209a-iNOS+ macrophages upon microbial stimulation. Importantly, Sfpi1 haploinsufficiency genetically distinguished the precursor activities of monocytes toward moDCs or microbicidal macrophages. Indeed, Sfpi1+/- mice had reduced Flt3+CD11c-MHCII+ monocytes and GM-CSF-dependent FcγRIII+PD-L2+CD209a+ moDCs but generated iNOS+ macrophages more efficiently. Therefore, intercellular disparities of PU.1 expression within naive monocytes segregate progenitor activity for inflammatory iNOS+ macrophages or moDCs.

Single-cell RNA sequencing uncovers the nuclear decoy lincRNA PIRAT as a regulator of systemic monocyte immunity during COVID-19.

The systemic immune response to viral infection is shaped by master transcription factors, such as NF-κB, STAT1, or PU.1. Although long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been suggested as important regulators of transcription factor activity, their contributions to the systemic immunopathologies observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection have remained unknown. Here, we employed a targeted single-cell RNA sequencing approach to reveal lncRNAs differentially expressed in blood leukocytes during severe COVID-19. Our results uncover the lncRNA PIRAT (PU.1-induced regulator of alarmin transcription) as a major PU.1 feedback-regulator in monocytes, governing the production of the alarmins S100A8/A9, key drivers of COVID-19 pathogenesis. Knockout and transgene expression, combined with chromatin-occupancy profiling, characterized PIRAT as a nuclear decoy RNA, keeping PU.1 from binding to alarmin promoters and promoting its binding to pseudogenes in naïve monocytes. NF-κB-dependent PIRAT down-regulation during COVID-19 consequently releases a transcriptional brake, fueling alarmin production. Alarmin expression is additionally enhanced by the up-regulation of the lncRNA LUCAT1, which promotes NF-κB-dependent gene expression at the expense of targets of the JAK-STAT pathway. Our results suggest a major role of nuclear noncoding RNA networks in systemic antiviral responses to SARS-CoV-2 in humans.

Decreased PU.1 expression in mature B cells induces lymphomagenesis.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of lymphoma, accounting for 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Although comprehensive analysis of genetic abnormalities has led to the classification of lymphomas, the exact mechanism of lymphomagenesis remains elusive. The Ets family transcription factor, PU.1, encoded by Spi1, is essential for the development of myeloid and lymphoid cells. Our previous research illustrated the tumor suppressor function of PU.1 in classical Hodgkin lymphoma and myeloma cells. In the current study, we found that patients with DLBCL exhibited notably reduced PU.1 expression in their lymphoma cells, particularly in the non-germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype. This observation suggests that downregulation of PU.1 may be implicated in DLBCL tumor growth. To further assess PU.1's role in mature B cells in vivo, we generated conditional Spi1 knockout mice using Cγ1-Cre mice. Remarkably, 13 of the 23 knockout mice (56%) showed splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, or masses, with some having histologically confirmed B-cell lymphomas. In contrast, no wild-type mice developed B-cell lymphoma. In addition, RNA-seq analysis of lymphoma cells from Cγ1-Cre Spi1F/F mice showed high frequency of each monoclonal CDR3 sequence, indicating that these lymphoma cells were monoclonal tumor cells. When these B lymphoma cells were transplanted into immunodeficient recipient mice, all mice died within 3 weeks. Lentiviral-transduced Spi1 rescued 60% of the recipient mice, suggesting that PU.1 has a tumor suppressor function in vivo. Collectively, PU.1 is a tumor suppressor in mature B cells, and decreased PU.1 results in mature B-cell lymphoma development.

17-ß Estradiol (E2) distinctly regulates the expression of IL-4 and IL-13 in Th2 cells via modulating the interplay between GATA3 and PU.1.

17-ß Estradiol (E2) has long standing known functions in regulating human physiology as well as immune system. E2 is known to elicit a protective role against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and has been used as a drug for treatment against multiple sclerosis. Moreover, E2 regulates the adaptive immune system by directly affecting the T helper cell subsets differentiation and antibody secretion mediated by B cells. Reports have shown that E2 promotes Th1 and Treg cell differentiation; whereas it attenuated the Th17 and Tfh cell differentiation. Albeit multiple and contrasting studies, the mechanisms of behind E2 action on Th2 cells remained understudied. Hence, we sought to dissect the impact of E2 in Th2 cell differentiation. In this study, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms behind E2-mediated regulation of the differentiation of Th2 cells. We observed that E2 significantly attenuated the IL-4-secreting Th2 population in an ERα-dependent manner. We validated these findings using ICI 182, 780, an antagonist to ERα, not ERß and ectopically overexpressing ERα in Th2 cells. We further determined that ERα alters the recruitment of GATA3 and PU.1 to Il4 gene by directly interacting with them. This altered recruitment was observed to be stronger at Il4 than Il13 locus. Interestingly, we detected a distinct recruitment of GATA3 and PU.1 at Il13 gene; however, there was no E2-mediated broad alteration in the recruitment of histone-modifiers at Il13 locus. These findings suggest that E2 regulates Il4 in a distinctly separate mechanism as opposed to Il13 locus in Th2 cells.

ETS Transcription Factors in Immune Cells and Immune-Related Diseases.

The development, differentiation, and function of immune cells are precisely regulated by transcription factors. The E26 transformation-specific (ETS) transcription factor family is involved in various physiological and pathological processes by regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Emerging evidence has suggested that ETS family proteins are intimately involved in the development and function of immune cells. This review summarizes the role of the ETS family in immune cells and immune-related disorders. Seven transcription factors within the ETS family, including PU.1, ETV5, ETV6, ETS1/2, ELK3, and ELF1, play essential roles in the development and function of T cells, B cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. Furthermore, they are involved in the occurrence and development of immune-related diseases, including tumors, allergies, autoimmune diseases, and arteriosclerosis. This review is conducive to a comprehensive overview of the role of the ETS family in immune cells, and thus is informative for the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the ETS family for immune-related diseases.

[The rs2564978(T) Allele Associated with Severe Influenza A Disrupts the Binding Site for Myeloid Differentiation Factor PU.1 and Reduces CD55/DAF Gene Promoter Activity in Macrophages].

The complement inhibitor CD55/DAF is expressed on many cell types. Dysregulation of CD55 expression is associated with increased disease severity in influenza A infection and vascular complications in pathologies that involve excessive activation of the complement system. A luciferase reporter system was used to functionally analyze the single nucleotide polymorphism rs2564978 in the U937 human promonocytic cell line. The polymorphism is in the promoter of the CD55 gene, and its minor allele T is associated with a severe course of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. A decreased activity of the CD55 promoter carrying the minor rs2564978(T) allele was observed in activated U937 cells, which provide a cell model of human macrophages. Using bioinformatics resources, PU.1 was identified as a potential transcription factor that may bind to the CD55 promoter at the rs2564978 site in an allele-specific manner. The involvement of PU.1 in modulating CD55 promoter activity was verified by a PU.1 genetic knockdown with small interfering RNAs under specific monocyte activation conditions.

The interaction of Pu.1 and cMyb in zebrafish neutrophil development.

Granulopoiesis is a highly ordered and precisely regulated process in which hematopoietic-related transcription factors play crucial roles. These transcription factors form complex regulatory networks through interactions with their co-factors or with each other, and anomalies in these networks can lead to the onset of leukemia. While the structures and functions of dozens of transcription factors involved in this process have been extensively studied, research on the regulatory relationships between these factors remains relatively limited. PU.1 and cMYB participate in multiple stages of neutrophil development, and their abnormalities are often associated with hematologic disorders. However, the regulatory relationship between these factors in vivo and their mode of interaction remain unclear. In this study, zebrafish models with cMyb overexpression (cmybhyper) and Pu.1 deficiency (pu.1G242D/G242D) were utilized to systematically investigate the interaction between Pu.1 and cMyb during granulopoiesis through whole-mount in situ hybridization, qRT-PCR, fluorescence reporting systems, and rescue experiments. The results showed a significant increase in cmyb expression in neutrophils of the pu.1G242D/G242D mutant, while there was no apparent change in pu.1 expression in cmybhyper. Further experiments involving injection of morpholino (MO) to decrease cmyb expression in pu.1G242D/G242D mutants, followed by SB and BrdU staining to assess neutrophil quantity and proliferation, revealed that reducing cmyb expression could rescue the abnormal proliferation phenotype of neutrophils in the pu.1G242D/G242D mutant. These findings suggest that Pu.1 negatively regulates the expression of cMyb during neutrophil development. Finally, through the construction of multi-site mutation plasmids and a fluorescent reporter system, confirmed that Pu.1 directly binds to the +72 bp site in the cmyb promoter, exerting negative regulation on its expression. In conclusion, this study delineates that Pu.1 participates in neutrophil development by regulating cmyb expression. This provides new insights into the regulatory relationship between these two factors and their roles in diseases.

ANP32B suppresses B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia through activation of PU.1 in mice.

ANP32B, a member of the acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 kDa (ANP32) family of proteins, is critical for normal development because its constitutive knockout mice are perinatal lethal. It is also shown that ANP32B acts as a tumor-promoting gene in some kinds of cancer such as breast cancer and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Herein, we observe that ANP32B is lowly expressed in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients, which correlates with poor prognosis. Furthermore, we utilized the N-myc or BCR-ABLp190 -induced B-ALL mouse model to investigate the role of ANP32B in B-ALL development. Intriguingly, conditional deletion of Anp32b in hematopoietic cells significantly promotes leukemogenesis in two B-ALL mouse models. Mechanistically, ANP32B interacts with purine rich box-1 (PU.1) and enhances the transcriptional activity of PU.1 in B-ALL cells. Overexpression of PU.1 dramatically suppresses B-ALL progression, and highly expressed PU.1 significantly reverses the accelerated leukemogenesis in Anp32b-deficient mice. Collectively, our findings identify ANP32B as a suppressor gene and provide novel insight into B-ALL pathogenesis.

PU.1-CD23 signaling mediates pulmonary innate immunity against Aspergillus fumigatus infection by driving inflammatory response.

BACKGROUND: Aspergillosis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised populations. PU.1 is critical for innate immunity against Aspergillus fumigatus (AF) in macrophages. However, the molecular mechanism underlying PU.1 mediating immunity against AF infection in human alveolar macrophages (AMs) is still unclear. METHODS: In this study, we detected the expressions of PU.1, CD23, p-ERK, CCL20 and IL-8 and key inflammatory markers IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-12 in human THP-1-derived macrophages (HTMs) or PU.1/CD23-overexpressed immunodeficient mice with AF infection. Moreover, we examined these expressions in PU.1-overexpressed/interfered HTMs. Additionally, we detected the phagocytosis of macrophages against AF infection with altered PU.1 expression. Dual luciferase, ChIP and EMSAs were performed to detect the interaction of PU.1 and CD23. And we invested the histological changes in mouse lung tissues transfected with PU.1/CD23-expressing adenoviruses in AF infection. RESULTS: The results showed that the expressions of PU.1, CD23, p-ERK, CCL20, IL-8, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-12 increased significantly with AF infection, and PU.1 regulated the later 8 gene expressions in HTMs. Moreover, CD23 was directly activated by PU.1, and overexpression of CD23 in PU.1-interfered HTMs upregulated IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-12 levels which were downregulated by PU.1 interference. PU.1 overexpression strengthened the phagocytosis of the HTMs against AF. And injection of PU.1/CD23-expressing adenoviruses attenuated pathological defects in immunodeficient mouse lung tissues with AF infection. Adenovirus (Ad)-PU.1 increased the CD23, p-ERK, CCL20, IL-8 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that PU.1-CD23 signaling mediates innate immunity against AF in lungs through regulating inflammatory response. Therefore, PU.1-CD23 may be a new anti-aspergillosis therapeutic for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis with the deepening of gene therapy and its wide application in the clinic.

The Myeloid-Specific Transcription Factor PU.1 Upregulates Mannose Receptor Expression but Represses Basal Activity of the HIV-LTR Promoter.

Human mannose receptor 1 (MRC1) is a cell surface receptor expressed in macrophages and other myeloid cells that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particle release by tethering virions to producer cell membranes. HIV-1 counteracts MRC1 expression by inhibiting mrc1 transcription. Here, we investigated the mechanism of MRC1 downregulation in HIV-1-infected macrophages. We identified the myeloid cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 as critical for regulating MRC1 expression. In the course of our study, we recognized a complex interplay between HIV-1 Tat and PU.1 transcription factors: Tat upregulated HIV-1 gene expression but inhibited mrc1 transcription, whereas PU.1 inhibited HIV-1 transcription but activated MRC1 expression. Disturbing this equilibrium by silencing PU.1 resulted in increased HIV-1 gene expression and reduced MRC1 promoter activity. Our study identified PU.1 as a central player in transcriptional control, regulating a complex interplay between viral and host gene expression in HIV-infected macrophages. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 replication in primary human cells depends on the activity of virus-encoded proteins but also involves cellular factors that can either promote (viral dependency factors) or inhibit (host restriction factors) virus replication. In previous work, we identified human MRC1 as a macrophage-specific host restriction factor that inhibits the detachment of viral particles from infected cells. Here, we report that HIV-1 counteracts this effect of MRC1 by imposing a transcriptional block on cellular MRC1 gene expression. The transcriptional inhibition of the MRC1 gene is accomplished by Tat, an HIV-1 factor whose best-described function actually is the enhancement of HIV-1 gene expression. Thus, HIV-1 has evolved to use the same protein for (i) activation of its own gene expression while (ii) inhibiting expression of MRC1 and other host factors.

PU.1 is a useful nuclear marker to distinguish between histiocytosis and histiocyte-rich tumours.

AIMS: The aim was to test the expression of PU.1 on different types of histiocytoses and to test the utility of PU.1 in confirming or excluding a histiocytic origin in tumour samples with suspicion of histiocytosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 66 biopsies of nonmalignant histiocytoses represented by Langerhans-cell histiocytosis (n = 13), Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) (n = 19), Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) (n = 14), mixed ECD-RDD (n = 3), ALK-positive histiocytosis (n = 6), and juvenile xanthogranuloma (n = 11). All cases were positive for PU.1 in reactive and neoplastic histiocytes. In addition, 39 cases of tumours with high-grade cytological atypia were referred to our center as suspicion of malignant histiocytosis/histiocytic sarcoma and only 18 were confirmed. Indeed, more than half of these tumours (21/39) were either undifferentiated malignant tumours with a stroma rich in histiocytes, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or high-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma. PU.1 was useful to distinguish between the negativity of large atypical nuclei and the positivity of stromal reactive histiocytes. CONCLUSION: PU.1 is expressed by all types of histiocytosis. It distinguishes histiocytosis from histiocyte-rich tumours with an easy interpretation due to its sharp nuclear staining. Its negativity in lesional/tumour cells in histiocyte-like lesions is useful to eliminate a histiocytosis.

Phellopterin attenuates ovarian cancer proliferation and chemoresistance by inhibiting the PU.1/CLEC5A/PI3K-AKT feedback loop.

Ovarian cancer is known as the second leading cause of gynecologic cancer-associated deaths in women worldwide. Developing new and effective compounds to alleviate chemoresistance is an urgent priority in ovarian cancer. Here, we aimed to reveal the biological function and underlying mechanisms of phellopterin, a naturally sourced ingredient of Angelica dahurica, in ovarian cancer progression as well as evaluate the therapeutic potential of phellopterin in ovarian cancer patients. In this investigation, we found that phellopterin mitigated DNA replication and induced cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA damage, attenuating cell proliferation and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer. Interestingly, bioinformatics analyses of data from our RNA sequencing and The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer dataset suggested that phellopterin presented anti-cancer activities in ovarian cancer cells by modulating signals affecting ovarian cancer progression and identified phellopterin as a potential compound in improving ovarian cancer patients' prognosis. In addition, the C-Type Lectin Domain Containing 5A (CLEC5A) was demonstrated as a downstream effector of phellopterin and involved in a positive PU.1/CLEC5A/PI3K-AKT feedback loop. Interestingly, phellopterin might inactivate the positive feedback circuit to suppress ovarian cancer progression. Collectively, our investigation revealed that phellopterin mitigated ovarian cancer proliferation and chemoresistance through suppressing the PU.1/CLEC5A/PI3K-AKT feedback loop, and predicted phellopterin as a new and effective cytotoxic drug and CLEC5A as a potential target for the treatment of ovarian cancer.