Human DDK rescues stalled forks and counteracts checkpoint inhibition at unfired origins to complete DNA replication.

Eukaryotic genomes replicate via spatially and temporally regulated origin firing. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) promote origin firing, whereas the S phase checkpoint limits firing to prevent nucleotide and RPA exhaustion. We used chemical genetics to interrogate human DDK with maximum precision, dissect its relationship with the S phase checkpoint, and identify DDK substrates. We show that DDK inhibition (DDKi) leads to graded suppression of origin firing and fork arrest. S phase checkpoint inhibition rescued origin firing in DDKi cells and DDK-depleted Xenopus egg extracts. DDKi also impairs RPA loading, nascent-strand protection, and fork restart. Via quantitative phosphoproteomics, we identify the BRCA1-associated (BRCA1-A) complex subunit MERIT40 and the cohesin accessory subunit PDS5B as DDK effectors in fork protection and restart. Phosphorylation neutralizes autoinhibition mediated by intrinsically disordered regions in both substrates. Our results reveal mechanisms through which DDK controls the duplication of large vertebrate genomes.

PDS5A and PDS5B in Cohesin Function and Human Disease.

Precocious dissociation of sisters 5 (PDS5) is an associate protein of cohesin that is conserved from yeast to humans. It acts as a regulator of the cohesin complex and plays important roles in various cellular processes, such as sister chromatid cohesion, DNA damage repair, gene transcription, and DNA replication. Vertebrates have two paralogs of PDS5, PDS5A and PDS5B, which have redundant and unique roles in regulating cohesin functions. Herein, we discuss the molecular characteristics and functions of PDS5, as well as the effects of its mutations in the development of diseases and their relevance for novel therapeutic strategies.

A kinase-dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion.

Sister-chromatid cohesion mediated by the cohesin complex is fundamental for precise chromosome segregation in mitosis. Through binding the cohesin subunit Pds5, Wapl releases the bulk of cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase, whereas centromeric cohesin is protected from Wapl until anaphase onset. Strong centromere cohesion requires centromeric localization of the mitotic histone kinase Haspin, which is dependent on the interaction of its non-catalytic N-terminus with Pds5B. It remains unclear how Haspin fully blocks the Wapl-Pds5B interaction at centromeres. Here, we show that the C-terminal kinase domain of Haspin (Haspin-KD) binds and phosphorylates the YSR motif of Wapl (Wapl-YSR), thereby directly inhibiting the YSR motif-dependent interaction of Wapl with Pds5B. Cells expressing a Wapl-binding-deficient mutant of Haspin or treated with Haspin inhibitors show centromeric cohesion defects. Phospho-mimetic mutation in Wapl-YSR prevents Wapl from binding Pds5B and releasing cohesin. Forced targeting Haspin-KD to centromeres partly bypasses the need for Haspin-Pds5B interaction in cohesion protection. Taken together, these results indicate a kinase-dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting centromeric cohesion in mitosis.

Cohesin subunits, STAG1 and STAG2, and cohesin regulatory factor, PDS5b, in oral squamous cells carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Cohesin complex is responsible for sister chromatid cohesion. STAG1/STAG2 is part of the complex, which is regulated by PDS5B. Alterations in these genes were described in tumors. PDS5B is a negative regulator of cell proliferation. We aimed to assess molecular alterations in these genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and predict their expression by the expression of 84 cell cycle genes. In addition, we investigated whether pds5b protein expression impacted ki-67 and p53 immunopositivity. METHODS: We assessed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at STAG1 and STAG2 loci in 15 OSCC using three polymorphic markers. Associations between the immunoexpression of pds5b and ki-67 and p53 were tested in 62 samples. Differences between transcriptional levels of STAG1, STAG2, and PDS5B between OSCC and normal oral mucosa (NM) were evaluated by qPCR. An 84 cell cycle genes qPCR array was carried with OSCC samples, and STAG1, STAG2, and PDS5B were independently used as response variables in multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity in at least one marker was observed in three samples. pds5b, p53, and ki-67 were highly expressed, and no association was found between pds5b immunoexpression and ki-67 or p53 (P > 0.05). OSCC and NM showed similar transcriptional levels of STAG1, STAG2, and PDS5B. STAG1 and CUL3 expression seem to be related (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: There is LOH at STAG1 and STAG2 loci in OSCC, but OSCC and NM showed similar transcriptional levels of STAG1, STAG2, and PDS5B. pds5b immunoexpression in OSCC was high, but it was not associated with proliferation cell index.

PDS5A and PDS5B differentially affect gene expression without altering cohesin localization across the genome.

BACKGROUND: Cohesin is an important structural regulator of the genome, regulating both three-dimensional genome organization and gene expression. The core cohesin trimer interacts with various HEAT repeat accessory subunits, yielding cohesin complexes of distinct compositions and potentially distinct functions. The roles of the two mutually exclusive HEAT repeat subunits PDS5A and PDS5B are not well understood. RESULTS: Here, we determine that PDS5A and PDS5B have highly similar localization patterns across the mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) genome and they show a strong overlap with other cohesin HEAT repeat accessory subunits, STAG1 and STAG2. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate individual stable knockout lines for PDS5A and PDS5B, we find that loss of one PDS5 subunit does not alter the distribution of the other PDS5 subunit, nor the core cohesin complex. Both PDS5A and PDS5B are required for proper gene expression, yet they display only partially overlapping effects on gene targets. Remarkably, gene expression following dual depletion of the PDS5 HEAT repeat proteins does not completely overlap the gene expression changes caused by dual depletion of the STAG HEAT repeat proteins, despite the overlapping genomic distribution of all four proteins. Furthermore, dual loss of PDS5A and PDS5B decreases cohesin association with NIPBL and WAPL, reduces SMC3 acetylation, and does not alter overall levels of cohesin on the genome. CONCLUSIONS: This work reveals the importance of PDS5A and PDS5B for proper cohesin function. Loss of either subunit has little effect on cohesin localization across the genome yet PDS5A and PDS5B are differentially required for gene expression.

Downregulation of APRIN expression increases cancer cell proliferation via an interleukin-6/STAT3/cyclin D axis.

APRIN is a putative tumor suppressor whose expression is low in a variety of cancer cells. While decreased expression of APRIN leads to increased cell proliferation, unfavorable diagnosis or metastases in various cancer types, there is limited knowledge on the cellular mechanism of APRIN in cellular responses. The effect of APRIN depletion on cancer cell proliferation was examined in the present study, and the IL-6/STAT3/cyclin D axis was identified as a novel regulatory mechanism. Stable depletion of APRIN in cancer cells resulted in increased cell proliferation. Cytokine array analysis of the cells revealed that downregulation of APRIN induced secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) with corresponding activation of STAT3, a downstream intracellular mediator. Levels of cyclin D1 were increased in cells with APRIN depletion and cyclin D1 expression was associated with increased STAT3 binding on cyclin D1 promoter sequence; assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. The addition of an IL-6 neutralizing antibody P620 to the cell culture attenuated STAT3 activation and cyclin D1 expression in APRIN-depleted cells with corresponding decrease in cell proliferation. These experiments suggest that APRIN regulates cancer cell proliferation via an IL-6/STAT3/cyclin D axis and that targeting this axis in APRIN-associated cancer might provide a novel therapeutic approach.

Pds5A and Pds5B Display Non-redundant Functions in Mitosis and Their Loss Triggers Chk1 Activation.

BACKGROUND: Pds5 is an abundant HEAT-repeat-containing protein that binds to cohesin and mediates sister chromatid cohesion. In vertebrates, Pds5A and Pds5B are known to protect DNA replication fork, as their loss leads to DNA damage. Pds5 interacts directly with Wapl, to remove cohesin during mitosis. AIM: To analyze the effects of the loss of Pds5 proteins-mediated DNA damage on the cell cycle checkpoints and to examine the possibility that Pds5 proteins have an overlapping function. METHODS: We first analyzed the cell cycle regulation of Pds5 proteins and defects in S-phase; DNA damage was confirmed after Pds5A/B knockdown. The activation of cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis were examined by the level of p-Chk1S317, MAD2 localization, and the level of pro-apoptotic markers, respectively. RESULTS: Pds5 proteins dissociated from chromatin in a stepwise manner, and their loss led to activation of pro-apoptotic markers associated with the phosphorylation of Chk1S317 due to DNA damage. Depletion of either Pds5A or Pds5B alone increased Smc3 acetylation in perturbed cell cycle, while depletion of both proteins severely impaired Smc3 acetylation. Moreover, the loss of Pds5A/Pds5B activated the SAC in an ATR-Chk1-dependent manner and stabilized Wapl on chromatin. The depletion of Chk1 rescued the S-phase delay associated with Pds5 depletion and significantly increased mitotic catastrophe. CONCLUSION: Pds5A and Pds5B display overlapping functions in facilitating Smc3 acetylation. Somewhat paradoxically, they also have non-redundant functions in terms of cohesin removal due to the activated surveillance mechanism that leads to phosphorylation of Chk1S317.

Structural analyses of inositol phosphate second messengers bound to signaling effector proteins.

The higher-order inositol phosphate second messengers inositol tetrakisphosphate (IP4), inositol pentakisphosphate (IP5) and inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) are important signaling molecules that regulate DNA-damage repair, cohesin dynamics, RNA-editing, retroviral assembly, nuclear transport, phosphorylation, acetylation, crotonylation, and ubiquitination. This functional diversity has made understanding how inositol polyphosphates regulate cellular processes challenging to dissect. However, some inositol phosphates have been unexpectedly found in X-ray crystal structures, occasionally revealing structural and mechanistic details of effector protein regulation before functional consequences have been described. This review highlights a sampling of crystal structures describing the interaction between inositol phosphates and protein effectors. This list includes the RNA editing enzyme "adenosine deaminase that acts on RNA 2" (ADAR2), the Pds5B regulator of cohesin dynamics, the class 1 histone deacetylases (HDACs) HDAC1 and HDAC3, and the PH domain of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk). One of the most important enzymes responsible for higher-order inositol phosphate synthesis is inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK), which plays dual roles in both inositol and phosphoinositide signaling. Structures of phosphoinositide lipid binding proteins have also revealed new aspects of protein effector regulation, as mediated by the nuclear receptors Steroidogenic Factor-1 (SF-1, NR5A2) and Liver Receptor Homolog-1 (LRH-1, NR5A2). Together, these studies underscore the structural diversity in binding interactions between effector proteins and inositol phosphate small signaling molecules, and further support that detailed structural studies can lead to new biological discovery.

PDS5B regulates cell proliferation and motility via upregulation of Ptch2 in pancreatic cancer cells.

Pds5b (precocious dissociation of sisters 5B) is involved in both tumorigenesis and cancer progression; however, the functions and molecular mechanisms of Pds5b in pancreatic cancer (PC) are unknown. Several approaches were conducted to investigate the molecular basis of Pds5b-related PC progression, including transfection, MTT, FACS, western blotting, wound healing assay, transwell chamber invasion assay, and immunohistochemical methods. Pds5b overexpression inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis, whereas the inhibition of Pds5b promoted growth of PC cells. Moreover, Pds5b overexpression inhibited cell migration and invasion, while the downregulation of Pds5b enhanced cell motility. Furthermore, reduced Pds5b expression was associated with survival in PC patients. Mechanistically, Pds5b positively regulated the expression of Ptch2 to influence the Sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. Consistently, Ptch2 downregulation enhanced cell growth, migration, and invasion, while inhibiting cell apoptosis. Notably, the downregulation of Ptch2 abolished Pds5b-mediated anti-tumor activity in PC cells. Strikingly, Pds5b expression was positively associated with levels of Ptch2 in PC patient samples, suggesting that the Pds5b/Ptch2 axis regulates cell proliferation and invasion in PC cells. Our findings indicate that targeting Pds5b and Ptch2 may represent a novel therapeutic approach for PC.

miR-223 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Invasion via Targeting PDS5B in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Emerging evidence has demonstrated that miR-223 is critically involved in the progression of pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated. In the present study, we explored the molecular basis of miR-223-mediated tumor progression in PC. We performed numerous approaches including MTT, FACS, transfection, RT-PCR, western blotting, Transwell, and animal studies to determine the physiological role of miR-223 in PC cells. We found that sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5 homolog B (PDS5B) is a direct target of miR-223 in PC. Moreover, PDS5B exhibits tumor-suppressive function in PC cells. Consistently, ectopic overexpression of PDS5B reversed miR-223-mediated tumor progression in PC cells. These results suggest that the miR-223/PDS5B axis regulates cell proliferation and invasion in PC cells. Our findings indicated that downregulation of miR-223 could be a novel therapeutic approach for PC.

The N-Terminal Non-Kinase-Domain-Mediated Binding of Haspin to Pds5B Protects Centromeric Cohesion in Mitosis.

Sister-chromatid cohesion, mediated by the multi-subunit cohesin complex, must be precisely regulated to prevent chromosome mis-segregation. In prophase and prometaphase, whereas the bulk of cohesin on chromosome arms is removed by its antagonist Wapl, cohesin at centromeres is retained to ensure chromosome biorientation until anaphase onset. It remains incompletely understood how centromeric cohesin is protected against Wapl in mitosis. Here we show that the mitotic histone kinase Haspin binds to the cohesin regulatory subunit Pds5B through a conserved YGA/R motif in its non-catalytic N terminus, which is similar to the recently reported YSR-motif-dependent binding of Wapl to Pds5B. Knockout of Haspin or disruption of Haspin-Pds5B interaction causes weakened centromeric cohesion and premature chromatid separation, which can be reverted by centromeric targeting of a N-terminal short fragment of Haspin containing the Pds5B-binding motif or by prevention of Wapl-dependent cohesin removal. Conversely, excessive Haspin capable of binding Pds5B displaces Wapl from Pds5B and suppresses Wapl activity, and it largely bypasses the Wapl antagonist Sgo1 for cohesion protection. Taken together, these data indicate that the Haspin-Pds5B interaction is required to ensure proper sister-chromatid cohesion, most likely through antagonizing Wapl-mediated cohesin release from mitotic centromeres.

Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion-related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability.

Cohesin is a protein complex that regulates chromatid cohesion and plays a role in preventing aneuploidy and maintaining chromosomal stability. SGOL1 encodes a cohesin protector, and PDS5B encodes a regulatory cohesion factor. Both SGOL1 and PDS5B are considered putative tumor suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to explore whether SGOL1 and PDS5B genes are mutated and expressionally altered in gastric and colorectal cancers. A genome database indicated that both genes possessed mononucleotide repeats in coding sequences, which could be mutation targets in cancers with microsatellite instability. We analyzed mutations in 91 gastric cancers and 100 colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability or stable/low microsatellite instability by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. We also analyzed SGOL1 and PDS5B expression by immunohistochemistry. Overall, we found 21 SGOL1 frameshift mutations in 21 cases and 18 PDS5B frameshift mutations in 16 cases. SGOL1 and PDS5B frameshift mutations were detected in 26.6% and 20.3%, respectively, of high microsatellite instability but not in stable/low microsatellite instability (0/112). By immunohistochemistry, losses of SGOL1 and PDS5B were identified in 19% to 47% of the gastric and colorectal cancers irrespective of microsatellite instability status. The losses were more common in those with frameshift mutations or high microsatellite instability than those without mutations or high microsatellite instability. The data indicate that frameshift mutations of SGOL1 and PDS5B and the loss of their expression may be a feature of gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. In addition, the data suggest that these alterations might contribute to cancer pathogenesis by deregulating cohesin-related functions.