Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with risk of positive resection margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subsequent reoperation. Prior reports grossly underestimate the risk of margin positivity with IBC containing a DCIS component (IBC + DCIS) due to patient-level rather than margin-level analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to delineate the relative risk of IBC + DCIS compared with pure IBC (without a DCIS component) on margin positivity through detailed margin-level interrogation. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in which pathology databases were evaluated to identify patients who underwent BCS over 5 years (2014-2019). Margin-level interrogation included granular detail into the extent, pathological subtype and grade of disease at each resection margin. Predictors of a positive margin were computed using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Clinicopathological details were examined from 5454 margins from 909 women. The relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS versus pure IBC was 8.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.64-11.56) applying UK Association of Breast Surgery guidelines, and 8.44 (95% CI 6.57-10.84) applying the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines. Independent predictors of margin positivity included younger patient age (0.033, 95% CI 0.006-0.060), lower specimen weight (0.045, 95% CI 0.020-0.069), multifocality (0.256, 95% CI 0.137-0.376), lymphovascular invasion (0.138, 95% CI 0.068-0.208) and comedonecrosis (0.113, 95% CI 0.040-0.185). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pure IBC, the relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS is approximately ninefold, significantly higher than prior estimates. This margin-level methodology is believed to represent the impact of DCIS more accurately on margin positivity in IBC.

Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting positive margins in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) treatment by Cold Knife Conization(CKC): a single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze factors associated with positive surgical margins following cold knife conization (CKC) in patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and to develop a machine-learning-based risk prediction model. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,343 patients who underwent CKC for HSIL at our institution. Logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between demographic and pathological characteristics and the occurrence of positive surgical margins. Various machine learning methods were then applied to construct and evaluate the performance of the risk prediction model. RESULTS: The overall rate of positive surgical margins was 12.9%. Independent risk factors identified included glandular involvement (OR = 1.716, 95% CI: 1.345-2.189), transformation zone III (OR = 2.838, 95% CI: 2.258-3.568), HPV16/18 infection (OR = 2.863, 95% CI: 2.247-3.648), multiple HR-HPV infections (OR = 1.930, 95% CI: 1.537-2.425), TCT ≥ ASC-H (OR = 3.251, 95% CI: 2.584-4.091), and lesions covering ≥ 3 quadrants (OR = 3.264, 95% CI: 2.593-4.110). Logistic regression demonstrated the best prediction performance, with an accuracy of 74.7%, sensitivity of 76.7%, specificity of 74.4%, and AUC of 0.826. CONCLUSION: Independent risk factors for positive margins after CKC include HPV16/18 infection, multiple HR-HPV infections, glandular involvement, extensive lesion coverage, high TCT grades, and involvement of transformation zone III. The logistic regression model provides a robust and clinically valuable tool for predicting the risk of positive margins, guiding clinical decisions and patient management post-CKC.

Risk factors for residual lesions after total hysterectomy in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to predict the risk factors for residual lesions in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent total hysterectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 212 patients with histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3) who underwent hysterectomy within 6 months after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Clinical data (e.g., age, menopausal status, HPV type, and Liquid-based cytology test(LCT) type), as well as pathological data affiliated with endocervical curettage (ECC), colposcopy, LEEP and hysterectomy, were retrieved from medical records. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate the relationship between the variables and risk of residual lesions after hysterectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 75 (35.4%) patients had residual lesions after hysterectomy. Univariate analyses revealed that positive margin (p = 0.003), glandular involvement (p = 0.017), positive ECC (p < 0.01), HPV16/18 infection (p = 0.032) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) I-III (p = 0.014) were factors related to the presence of residual lesions after hysterectomy. Conversely, postmenopausal status, age ≥ 50 years, ≤ 30 days from LEEP to hysterectomy, and LCT type were not risk factors for residual lesions. A positive margin (p = 0.025) and positive ECC (HSIL) (p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for residual lesions in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that positive incisal margins and ECC (≥ CIN2) were risk factors for residual lesions, while glandular involvement and VaIN were protective factors. In later clinical work, colposcopic pathology revealed that glandular involvement was associated with a reduced risk of residual uterine lesions. 60% of the patients with residual uterine lesions were menopausal patients, and all patients with carcinoma in situ in this study were menopausal patients. Therefore, total hysterectomy may be a better choice for treating CIN in menopausal patients with positive margins and positive ECC.

Long-term consequences of positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: multi-institutional analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to determine the impact of positive surgical margins (PSM) after PN on very long-term recurrence in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Patients who underwent PN for a localized renal tumour were included. Patients were stratified according to the presence of PSM. Data on patients' characteristics, the tumour, the peri- and postoperative events were collected. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Sensitivity analyses using weighted propensity score analysis was performed to account for potential selection biases arising from the nonrandom allocation of patients to different groups. RESULTS: A total of 1115 patients were included in the study. The incidence of PSM was 5.4% (n = 61). The median follow-up time was 51 months for the PSM group and 61 months for the NSM group (p = 0.31). Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the PSM group (13%, n = 8) compared to the NSM group (7%, n = 73) (p = 0.05). This resulted in a significant reduction in DFS in the PSM group (p = 0.004), particularly pronounced in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Additionally, OS was significantly lower in the PSM group (p < 0.01). Propensity score analysis confirmed a decrease in DFS for the PSM group (p = 0.05), while there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective multicenter study, PSM impact on oncological outcomes, increasing recurrence, but no difference in OS was observed post-adjustment for biases.

Impact of resection margin on outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities treated with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The standard curative treatments for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) include surgical resection with negative margins and perioperative radiotherapy. However, the optimal resection margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in ESTS between microscopically positive margin (R1) and microscopically negative margin (R0) according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (R + 1 mm) classification. METHODS: Medical records of patients with localized ESTS who underwent primary limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed for at least 5 years or till local or distant recurrence was diagnosed during follow-up. Outcomes were local and distal recurrences and survival. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in this study, in which 17 underwent R0 resection and 35 underwent R1 resection. No significant differences were observed in rates of local recurrence (11.4% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.062) or distant recurrence (40.0% vs. 41.18%, p = 0.935) between R0 and R1 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that distant recurrences was associated with a Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade (Grade III vs. I, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 12.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67-58.88, p = 0.001) and tumor location (lower vs. upper extremity, aHR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.7, p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier plots showed no significant differences in local (p = 0.444) or distant recurrent-free survival (p = 0.161) between R0 and R1 groups. CONCLUSIONS: R1 margins, when complemented by radiotherapy, did not significantly alter outcomes of ESTS as R0 margins. Further studies with more histopathological types and larger cohorts are necessary to highlight the path forward.

Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Microscopic Residual Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the gold standard for early-stage breast cancer. Positive surgical margins are associated with poor outcome. Endocrine therapy (ET) is recommended as primary systemic treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer after surgery. We hypothesized that chemoenocrine therapy (CET) would not be associated with improved survival relative to ET for patients with positive margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for pathologic stage I HR + HER2-breast cancer patients treated with partial mastectomy and adjuvant whole-breast irradiation between 2004 and 2017. The adjuvant treatment approaches to positive surgical margins were investigated and compared. Overall survival was compared between systemic treatment groups using multivariable cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 228,453 patients, a positive surgical margin (microscopic residual disease, R1) was identified in 3561 (1.6%) patients. Compared with complete resections, positive margin was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.276, P = 0.003). Among the R1 patients, 78.7% received ET only, 11.7% received CET, 1.2% received chemotherapy only, and 8.5% received no systemic therapy. After controlling for patient, facility, and tumor characteristics, ET provided greatest survival benefit (relative to no therapy, HR = 0.378, P < 0.001) followed by CET (HR = 0.446, P = 0.020). Compared with ET alone, CET is not associated with additional overall survival benefit (HR = 1.179, P = 0.595). CONCLUSIONS: CET appeared not to be associated with an improved overall survival in early stage HR + HER2-breast cancer with microscopic residual disease relative to ET. Positive surgical margins therefore are probably not a relevant clinical factor for adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making.

Impact of positive vascular margins status after surgical resection of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma with caval tumour thrombus: a propensity score multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Data evaluating the impact of positive vascular margins (PVMs) following surgical resection of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the oncological impact of positive vascular margins following surgical resection of RCC with IVC tumor thrombus. METHODS: Patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with the removal of IVC tumour thrombus for RCC between 2000 and 2019 were included. PVMs were identified from pathology reports defined as microscopically identified tumour present in the IVC wall at the site of resection or in case of thrombus was not completely removed. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between patients with PVMs versus negative vascular margins, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score. Local recurrence, distant metastasis and overall mortality were evaluated between groups using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: 209 patients were analyzed. Among them, 49 (23%) patients with PVMs were identified. Median follow-up was 55 months. After adjustment, excellent balance was achieved for most propensity score variables. In IPTW analysis, PVMs was associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 3.66; p < 0.001) without any impact on systemic recurrence (HR = 1.15; p = 0.47) or overall mortality (HR = 1.23; p = 0.48). Limitations include the sample size and unmeasured confounding. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a PVMs in patients with RCC after nephrectomy with thrombectomy is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, however, it did not appear to influence the risk of distant metastasis or death.

Management of patients with positive margin after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) in the treatment of patients with positive margin in comparison to regular follow-up, and a repeat cervical conization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 83 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with a positive margin after conization. The management methods and patient prognosis were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-five, 33, and 15 patients were treated for regular follow-up, ALA-PDT, and a repeat cervical conization, respectively. About 33.3% (5/15) patients had residual lesions of low-grade CIN and above after recognization. The clinical characteristics of patients in the three groups were similar. The residual lesion rates of patients selected for follow-up, ALA-PDT, and recognization were 34.3% (12/35), 9.1% (3/33), and 0% (0/15), respectively, at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.004). The HPV clearance rates were 31.3%, 66.7%, and 84.6%, respectively (p = 0.01). Further analysis showed that a positive margin in the inscribed margin of the cervical canal (p = 0.022) and persistent HR-HPV positive tests after initial conization (p = 0.003) significantly increased the risk of residual disease. At 2-year follow-up, the recurrence rates of lesions were 3.3% and 26.1% in the ALA-PDT and follow-up groups, respectively (p = 0.021). Notably, the recurrence rates were not significantly different between the ALA-PDT and recognization groups (3.3% vs. 6.7%) (p = 0.561). CONCLUSION: ALA-PDT is an effective treatment for patients with a positive margin after cervical conization for high-grade CIN. Compared with regular follow-up, ALA-PDT can reduce residual and recurrence rate. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between AlA-PDT and recognization.

The effect of reconstruction on positive margin rates in oral cancer: Using length of stay as a proxy measure for flap reconstruction in a national database.

PURPOSE: Planned flap reconstruction, allowing aggressive resections of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), may decrease positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stay (LOS), as a proxy measure for flap reconstruction, is associated with positive margin rates in OCSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Database was retrospectively collected for patients undergoing surgery for previously untreated clinical T1-3 OCSCC. Post-operative LOS was dichotomized between ≤4 and >4 days as a proxy measure for whether patients may have received flap reconstruction. Patients with LOS >4 days represent a diverse group, but those with a LOS ≤4 days are less likely to have undergone an oral cavity flap reconstruction. RESULTS: 10,107 patients were included, of which 5290 (52%) were clinical T1 and 4852 (48%) were clinical T2-3. 771 (8%) patients had a positive surgical margin. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, LOS ≤4 days was significantly associated with a positive margin resection in patients with clinical T2-3 tumors (OR 1.68, 95%CI 1.37-2.06) compared to patients with LOS >4 days. LOS was not associated with surgical margin status in patients with clinical T1 disease (OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.55-1.06). Patients with positive margin resections demonstrated worse overall survival (cT1: OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.06-1.72; cT2-3: OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.33-1.74). CONCLUSIONS: LOS >4 days after oral cavity cancer resection was significantly associated with negative surgical margins in clinical T2-3 oral cavity cancer, suggesting the possibility that patients undergoing flap reconstruction after resection have fewer positive surgical margins.

HPV16 persistent infection and recurrent disease after LEEP.

BACKGROUND: About 23% of patients develop CIN2+ after LEEP treatment due to residual or recurrent lesions. The majority of patients with HPV infection were HPV negative before treatment, but 16,4% were still HPV 16 positive after treatment, indicating that conization do not necessarily clear HPV infection rapidly. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the possible correlation existing between the appearance of recurring high-grade lesions and the viral genotype 16, and other risk factors such as residual disease. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two HPV positive patients underwent LEEP for CIN2+. The follow-up post treatment was carried out every 6 months. Abnormal results during follow-up were confirmed histologically and considered recurrent high-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions (CIN2/CIN3 or CIS). Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS software package for Windows (version 15.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are expressed as frequency, arithmetic mean, standard deviation (S.D.) and percentages. We calculated significance (P < 0.5) with the Easy Fischer Test. We calculated the Odds Ratio (OR) of women with peristent HPV 16 infection and positive margin, to have a recurrence. RESULTS: In our study, the rate of persistent infection from HPV 16, after LEEP, was 15.9% (29/182) with 94% (17/18) of the recurring disease occurring within 18 months of follow up. From this study it was found that the persistence of genotype 16 is associated with a greater rate of relapse post-conization of CIN 2+ lesions, with respect to other genotypes. Our study further supports those studies that demonstrate that the risk for residual disease or relapse is not to be overlooked, also when the margins are negative, but persistent HPV infection is present. In our case study, 40% of relapses were in women with negative margin, but with persistent HPV 16 infection. Even more so, the margins involved in HPV16 positive subjects is another prediction factor for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the importance of genotyping and that persistent HPV 16 infection should be considered a risk factor for the development of residual/recurrent CIN 2/3.

Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate biochemical recurrence (BCR) patterns amongst men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with specimens having negative (NSM), positive (PSM), and close surgical margins (CSM) from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort, as PSM after RP are a significant predictor of biochemical failure and possible disease progression, with CSM representing a diagnostic challenge for surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men undergoing RP between 1988 and 2015 with known final pathological margin status were evaluated. The cohort was divided into three groups based on margin status; NSM, PSM, and CSM. CSM were defined by distance of tumour ≤1 mm from the surgical margin. BCR was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >0.2 ng/mL, two values at 0.2 ng/mL, or secondary treatment for an elevated PSA level. Predictors of BCR, metastases, and mortality were analysed using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 5515 men in the SEARCH database, 4337 (79%) men met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Of these, 2063 (48%) had NSM, 1902 (44%) had PSM, and 372 (8%) had CSM. On multivariable analysis, relative to NSM, men with CSM had a higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.82; P < 0.001) but a decreased risk of BCR when compared to those men with PSM (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.86-2.36; P < 0.001). Metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality did not differ based on margin status alone. CONCLUSIONS: Management of men with CSM is a diagnostic challenge, with a disease course that is not entirely benign. The evaluation of other known risk factors probably provides greater prognostic value for these men and may ultimately better select those who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining for atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation (AIMP) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the frequency of diagnostic change to melanoma (upstaging) and the frequency of local recurrence after MMS for AIMP. A secondary outcome was the frequency of subclinical spread (defined as the requirement for >1 stage of MMS to achieve tumor-free margins). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of 223 AIMP (with 92.4% located on the head, neck, hand, foot, or pretibial leg) patients treated with MMS with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining. RESULTS: Upstaging to unequivocal melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma was identified in 18.8% (42/223) of all AIMP patients. The local recurrence rate was 0% (0/223) with a mean follow-up time of 2.7 years (998 days). Subclinical spread was present in 23.8% (53/223) of AIMP patients. LIMITATIONS: Single site, retrospective design, observational study, lack of objective criteria to diagnose AIMP. CONCLUSION: MMS with MART-1 immunostaining achieves excellent local control of specialty site AIMP and permits definitive removal of subclinical spread before reconstruction. The central debulking excision should be evaluated with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section staining, since a significant percentage of AIMP are reclassified as melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma.

The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that after controlling for case-mix differences, the rates of positive resection margin after rectal cancer surgery vary substantially in the United States and that high-volume hospitals have lower margin positivity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with oncologic resection for stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from the 1998-2010 National Cancer Data Base. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rates and hospital level variability in positive margin rates using Empirical Bayes techniques. RESULTS: A total of 113,113 patients were treated at 1446 hospitals. The mean overall risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rate was 7.3%. High-volume hospitals did not have a lower rate of adjusted margin positivity (7.4%, P = 0.75). When both case mix and hospital volume differences were factored into the model, variability in margin positivity rates increased by 9.8%, implying that referral to high-volume hospitals alone would not improve margin positivity rates. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer margin positivity rates vary substantially in the United States, despite adjusting for differences in case mix. These results support standardization of surgical technique and pathologic assessment as part of a broader initiative that identifies and refers patients to higher performing hospitals rather than simply to higher volume hospitals.

Clinical implications of positive margins following non-small cell lung cancer surgery.

Positive margins following pulmonary resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occur in approximately 5-15% of patients undergoing a curative procedure. The presence of positive margins negatively impacts long-term outcomes by setting the stage for local and potentially distant disease recurrence. Despite major clinical ramifications, there are very few dedicated reports that examine the implications of positive margins following surgery for NSCLC. Furthermore, published series are typically retrospective studies from single institutions. In this review we analyze published data with special consideration of four pertinent questions: (i) what are the long term outcomes of a positive margin following pulmonary resection?, (ii) is intraoperative margin assessment by frozen section reliable?, (iii) what is the optimal distance of the tumor margin to the surgical margin?, and (iv) should adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy be used in the setting of a positive surgical margin?

Frequency of and factors associated with positive or equivocal margins in conventional excision of atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferations (AIMP): A single academic institution cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: No evidence-based surgical guidelines exist for atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation (AIMP), a descriptive histopathologic diagnosis with uncertain malignant potential. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the frequency of and risk factors associated with positive or equivocal margins after conventional excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 413 AIMPs treated by conventional excision. RESULTS: Positive or equivocal margins were seen in 2.9% (12/413) of conventional excisions of AIMP. Risk factors associated with positive or equivocal margins included anatomic location on the head and neck (5/51, 9.8%; odds ratio 6.91, 95% confidence interval 1.93-24.80) (P = .012) and a preoperative biopsy specimen that included melanoma in situ in the differential diagnosis (11/214, 5.1%; odds ratio 10.73, 95% confidence interval 1.37-83.88) (P = .006). The frequency of positive or equivocal margins did not differ significantly with surgical margins greater than or less than 5 mm (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.18-2.07) (P = .457). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-site, retrospective observational study. CONCLUSION: AIMP has a significantly increased risk for incomplete excision when it is located on the head and neck or has a preoperative histologic differential diagnosis that includes melanoma in situ. These subsets of AIMP may benefit from Mohs micrographic surgery or staged surgical excision to confirm clear margins before reconstruction.

Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extirpative quality of an open radical prostatectomy (RP) technique by first categorising and mapping all intraprostatic incisions into benign tissue and then determining a cumulative technical error rate given by all intraprostatic incisions into benign and malignant tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data relating to 1065 men with clinically localised prostate cancer who underwent open retropubic RP (70.6% nerve-sparing surgery [NSS]) by a single surgeon (January 2005 to December 2011). We recorded all intraprostatic incisions: (i) iatrogenic positive surgical margins (PSMs), (ii) deep or superficial benign capsular incisions (BCIs), (iii) incisions into benign prostate glands at the prostate apex or bladder neck (benign glandular tissue incisions [BGTIs]), and determined incision location, length and nature (solitary/multiple). We evaluated: (i) associations between benign incisions, NSS and PSMs, (ii) significant predictors for PSM risk by multivariate analysis, (iii) postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS: Intraprostatic incision rates were 2.3% pT2 PSMs, 6.0% BCIs and 5.4% BGTIs. There were slight variations in rate over time and with NSS technique. Benign incisions were located as follows: 46.8% right posterolateral, 37.5% left posterolateral, and 15.7% bilateral for BCIs; 58.6% bladder neck and 41.4% apical for BGTIs. The median (range) incision length, for solitary and multiple incisions respectively, was 4 (1-13) and 9 (2-25) mm for BCIs and 1 (1-5) and 2 (2-6) mm for BGTIs. BCI rate, but not BGTI rate, was significantly associated with NSS (P = 0.004) and PSM (P = 0.005), and increased PSM risk 3.6-fold. A PSM increased BCR risk two-fold (odds ratio 2.078, 95% confidence interval 1.383-3.122). BCR-free survival decreased significantly even for short PSMs (<1 mm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the pT2 PSM rate was low (2.3%), the cumulative technical error rate (patients with at least one pT2 PSM, BCI or BGTI) was five-fold higher (12.5%). Categorising and mapping intraprostatic incisions is a tool surgeons can use in self-audits to identify areas of potential improvement, reduce errors, and improve surgical skills.

Role of post-operative radiation boost for soft tissue sarcomas with positive margins following pre-operative radiation and surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The role of a radiation therapy (RT) boost for positive margins following pre-operative RT and surgery in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is unclear. We assessed the contribution of a boost to local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: We identified 67 patients treated from 1987 to 2011 with pre-operative RT and surgery with positive margin(s). Select patients received a boost delivered as peri-operative Iridium-192 brachytherapy (BRT), intra-operative electrons (IORT), or post-operative external beam RT (EBRT). RESULTS: Ten patients received no RT boost, 10 received a BRT or IORT boost, and 47 received an EBRT boost. Five-year LC rates for no boost, BRT/IORT boost, and EBRT boost were 100%, 78%, and 71% (P = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, there were no significant predictors for LC. Variables associated with improved DFS rates were single positive margin (P = 0.007) and low tumor grade (P = 0.03). Tumor size <5 cm (P = 0.003), low grade (P = 0.001), and boost (P = 0.02) were associated with longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify a LC advantage for an RT boost. Given the unidentified selection factors for delivery of boost and its potential toxicities, its role in this setting remains unproven.

Integration of Multiparameter MRI into Conventional Pretreatment Risk Factors to Predict Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the prediction of the likelihood of PSMs in patients undergoing similar surgical procedures remains a challenge. We aim to develop a predictive model for PSMs in patients undergoing non-nerve-sparing RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from PCa patients who underwent minimally invasive non-nerve-sparing RP at our hospital between June 2017 and June 2021. We identified independent risk factors associated with PSMs using clinical and MRI-based parameters in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzes. These factors were then used to develop a nomogram for predicting the probability of PSMs. The predictive performance was validated using calibration and receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve ,and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analyzes revealed prostate-specific antigen density, tumor size, tumor location at the apex, tumor contact length, extracapsular extension (ECE) level, and apparent diffusion coefficient value as independent risk factors. A nomogram was developed and validated with high accuracy (C-index = 0.78). Furthermore, we found that 44.2% of patients diagnosed with organ-confined disease had ECE after surgery, and 29.1% of patients with Gleason scores ≤7 had higher pathological scores. Interestingly, the tumor burden calculated from PCa biopsy cores was overestimated when compared to postoperative PCa specimens. CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable nomogram for predicting the risk of PSMs in PCa patients undergoing non-nerve-sparing RP. The study highlights the importance of incorporating these parameters in personalized surgical management.

Clinical outcomes of colorectal neoplasm with positive resection margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

A positive resection margin after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. We aimed to identify the clinical significance of positive resection margins in colorectal neoplasms after ESD. We reviewed 632 patients who had en bloc colorectal ESD at two hospitals between 2015 and 2020. The recurrence rates and presence of residual tumor after surgery were evaluated. The rate of additional surgery after ESD and recurrence rate were significantly higher in patients with incomplete resection (n = 75) compared to patients with complete resection (n = 557). When focusing solely on non-invasive lesions, no significant differences in recurrence rates were observed between the groups with complete and incomplete resection (0.2% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.057). Among 84 patients with submucosal invasive carcinoma, 39 patients underwent additional surgery due to non-curative resection. Positive vertical margin and lymphovascular invasion were associated with residual tumor. Lymphovascular invasion was associated with lymph node metastasis. However, no residual tumor nor lymph node metastases were found in patients with only one unfavorable histological factor. In conclusion, a positive resection margin in non-invasive colorectal lesions, did not significantly impact the recurrence rate. Also, in T1 colorectal cancer with a positive vertical resection margin, salvage surgery can be considered in selected patients with additional risk factors.

Circumferential resection margin positivity due to direct or indirect tumour involvement in rectal cancer - a call for better stratification.

BACKGROUND: A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) after rectal cancer surgery, which can be the result of direct or indirect tumour involvement, has consistently been associated with increased local recurrence and poorer survival. However, little is known of the differential impact of the mode of tumour involvement on outcomes. METHODS: 1460 consecutive patients undergoing rectal cancer resection between 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Histopathology reports for patients with a positive CRM were reviewed to determine cases of direct (R1-tumour) or indirect tumour involvement (R1-other). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The role of the mode of CRM positivity was examined by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients had an R1 resection due to CRM involvement (5.8%). Of those, 69 were due to direct tumour involvement, while 16 were from indirect causes. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that R1-other was associated with increased OS (hazard ratio 0.40, log-rank P = 0.006) and DFS (P = 0.043). Multivariate regression confirmed that the mode of CRM positivity was an independent predictor of OS. More interestingly, the patterns of recurrence were different between the two groups, with R1-tumour leading to significantly more local recurrence (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly suggests that direct tumour involvement of the CRM confers worse prognosis after rectal cancer surgery. Importantly, differences in the site and frequency of recurrences make a case for better stratification of patients with a positive CRM to guide treatment decisions.