Early history of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: No comprehensive treatise on the early history of fractures of posterior malleolus (PM) has yet been published, and many substantial discoveries have fallen into oblivion-particularly if not having been published in English originally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: Early history of PM fractures from their first description up to the beginnings of their operative treatment may be divided into three basic periods, covering the era between 1828 and 1940. In the pre-radiological period (1828-1895), description of PM injuries was based merely on the autopsy findings in deceased patients. The first mentions of this injury were published by the British authors. In the radiologic period (1899-1916), the x-ray examination started a revolution also in diagnostics of ankle fractures, with the first radiographs performed as early as in 1899. Radiographic examination had subsequently become an integral part of the diagnostics of these injuries and initiated a number of significant studies of PM fractures. The first detailed mention of a PM injury may be found in the French and German literature. The period of early operative treatment (1918-1940), i.e., open reduction and internal fixation of PM, was started by the younger post-WWI generation, primarily the French surgeons, represented by Gaston Picot. His operative technique and the first six cases treated operatively between 1918 and 1921 were described in 1921 by Edouard Huc. Picot himself published his technique in great detail in 1923. CONCLUSION: The early history of diagnostics and treatment of PM fractures witnesses the remarkable body of knowledge gathered about that topic by numerous visionary surgeons predominantly French and German surgeons immediately before and after World War I. They substantially contributed to the radiological examination and operative treatment of this injury.

The morphometry of distal tibia and posterior malleolus and its clinical implications in total ankle prosthesis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to reveal the morphometry of the distal tibia and posterior malleolus and to generate morphometric reference data for the tibial component of total ankle prosthesis. METHODS: This study was performed on 121 human dry tibiae (47 right, 74 left). The morphometric measurements of distal tibial structures, tibial length and the distance between the medial and posterior malleolus were measured in this study. Measurements on 44 tibiae were repeated three times and averaged for minimizing intra-observer error. RESULTS: The tibial length was found 34.19 ± 2.31 cm. Mean values of width of fibular notch at tibial plafond and 10 mm proximal to the tibial plafond were 25.71 ± 2.44 mm and 17.81 ± 2.46 mm, respectively. Mean depth of fibular notch at tibial plafond and 10 mm proximal to the tibial plafond were 3.60 ± 1.04 mm and 3.37 ± 1.24 mm, respectively. Mean height of fibular notch was found 48.21 ± 10.51 mm. Mean width and height of medial malleolus were 25.08 ± 2.13 mm and 14.73 ± 1.85 mm, respectively. Mean width and length of tibial plafond were 27.71 ± 2.74 mm and 26.96 ± 2.62 mm, respectively. Mean values of width and height of posterior malleolus were measured 21.41 ± 3.26 mm and 6.74 ± 1.56 mm, respectively. Mean distance between medial and posterior malleolus was found 37.17 ± 3.53 mm. Mean width and depth of malleolar groove were 10.26 ± 1.84 mm and 1.73 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. The mean intra-class correlation values were found between the 0.959 and 0.999. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the distal tibial morphometry is crucial for designing convenient ankle replacement implants for Turkish population. To our knowledge, this study is the first in the literature that identifies posterior malleolar morphometry on dry tibiae. We believe that this study will make a significant contribution to the literature about distal tibial morphometry and especially the posterior malleolus and the data of our study can be used for designing total ankle prosthesis in Turkish population.

Morphology of Fibular Incisura is a Deciding Factor Between Posterior Malleolus Avulsion Fracture or Syndesmotic Ligament Injury in Ankle Fractures.

The bone anatomy of tibiofibular syndesmosis has been a topic of interest. Fibular incisura morphology has been analyzed on cadaver specimens, plain radiographs, or CT images. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of fibula incisura features and fibula morphology in ankle injuries, especially involving posterior malleolus and posteroinferior tibiofibular ligament injuries. From 2017 through 2022, A total of 59 patients with isolated lateral malleolar fracture, Mason-Malloy type 1 posterior malleolar fracture, syndesmosis injury in those without posterior malleolar fracture, supination external rotation type 3 injuries according to Lauge-Hansen classification, and preoperative bilateral ankle computed tomography images were included in the study. Fibula morphologies and syndesmosis measurements were made from preoperative computed tomography images using axial CT images from 1 cm proximal to the tibial plafond. The diagnosis of posterior malleolar fractures was made using the CT classification system of Mason and Malloy, and the diagnosis of syndesmosis injury was made with a cotton test during surgery. Age, gender, fractured side, incisura type, incisor depth, width, anterior and posterior facet lengths, incisor version (antevert-retrovert), the angle between the anterior and posterior facets, and fibula type were recorded. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in posterior facet length and incisura width. Morphological features of fibular incisura may be the determinant of PITFL injury or PMA injury in fibular fractures caused by an external rotation mechanism.

PA Screw Versus Plate Fixation for Posterior Malleolar Fracture, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications and Functional Results.

Fixation methods for posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) are a source of great controversy. This study aims to compare complications, clinical, and radiological outcomes between PA screws and posterior plate in PMF using current literature. A systematic search strategy was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. Medline (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), and Lilacs databases were used to identify complication rates (infection, nonunion, loss of reduction, osteoarthrosis, and sural nerve injury) and to compare reported functional outcomes. The level of evidence in the articles was assessed using the GRADE tool. The studies eligible for meta-analysis were processed using The Review Manager version 5.4.1 software. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria; 5 articles were included for subgroup meta-analysis. Overall infection rate, loss of reduction and sural nerve injury were each 2%. Osteoarthritis rate was 10%. There was no difference in risk reduction for infection rate (RD = 0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.06; p = .50), loss of reduction (RD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.03; p = .88), sural nerve injury (RD = 0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.04; p = .70), osteoarthrosis (RD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.09; p = .97), functional (MD = 0.70; 95% CI: -1.06 to 2.45; p = .44) or pain scores (MD = 0.12; 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.55; p = .58), nor deficit in dorsiflexion (MD= -0.26; 95% CI: -1.64 to 1.12; p = .71). There were no clinical nor radiological significant differences when comparing fixation of PMF with plates or PA screws. With current literature it is not possible to establish the superiority of either fixation.

Comparison between anterior-to-posterior screw fixation versus posterolateral approach plate fixation for posterior malleous fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: There are two main surgical fixation methods for the posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), the anterior-to-posterior (AP) screws or via the posterolateral (PL) approach utilizing a buttress plate. This review aims to compare the clinical outcome between the AP screw fixation and the PL plate fixation for treating PMFs. METHODS: We searched all relevant publications about PMFs treated with AP screws or PL plates through electronic databases including the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Embase, the Wiley online library and the Web of Science. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluated clinical outcomes including reduction quality, post-operative function and complications. RESULTS: Six studies (one single randomized controlled trial and five retrospective cohort studies) were enrolled. 172 patients underwent AP screw fixation and 214 patients underwent PL plate fixation with a total of 386 patients (169 males and 217 females). The PL plating group yielded better AOFAS scores(MD = 6.97, 95 % CI=[4.68, 9.27], P＜0.00001, I2 =0 %) and was more likely to achieve excellent anatomical reduction(OR=5.49, 95 % CI=[1.06, 28.42], P = 0.04, I2 =80 %). No differences were found in the bad reduction quality, incidences of complications (arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the PL plate fixation method has the clinical benefit of achieving anatomical reduction and better AOFAS scores over the AP screw fixation for treating PMFs. No differences were found in the incidences of complications ( arthritis, neuralgia, superficial wound healing problems and implant failure), the walking VAS scores and the dorsiflexion restriction degrees. The posterior approach and the direct reduction are recommended for the treatment of the PMFs. LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE: Ⅱb.

The reliability of posterior malleolar ankle fracture assessment: a unique perspective.

AIM: This study aims to elucidate the pathology of PMFs in the South African population, establish correlations between fracture patterns and international classification guidelines and evaluate the interobserver reliability of current classifications. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in a multicentre analysis over a one-year period from January 2019 to December 2019 at our institution. Computer tomography scans for foot and ankle injuries were reviewed, and posterior malleolus fractures were included. Pathoanatomical data was collected and analysed according to known classification systems and subsequent treatment modalities evaluated. A panel of observers individually reviewed radiographic data to determine interobserver reliability. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included with a mean age of 41 ± 13.4 years (range 18-78) and a female predominant population (69%). A greater proportion of injuries were high energy (23.9%), with significant fragment comminution (53.5%), and half (52.1%) of all injuries were subluxated/dislocated at presentation. A total of 93% of injuries were managed operatively, despite theatre access limitations resulting in significant delays to fixation (19.1 days). Despite good pathoanatomical agreement with most international classifications, interobserver reliability was poor (Krippendorff α-coefficient < 0.667). Inconsistent treatment patterns in operative and non-operative strategies are reported. CONCLUSION: A unique patient population of younger, female individuals incurred posterior malleolar fractures due to higher energy mechanisms of injury. Whilst injury patterns were mostly comparable, significant interobserver variability was noted. Resource limitations, diagnostic challenges, poorly defined and inconsistent treatment strategies, inevitably impact outcomes within the South African population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Temporary immobilization methods for closed low-energy ankle fracture-dislocations: comparative analysis of a retrospective cohort.

PURPOSE: Ankle fracture-dislocations (AFD) often necessitate staged management involving temporary external fixation (EF) due to mechanical instability or blistering. However, limited literature exists on the optimal temporary immobilization method for low-energy closed AFD. This study compared baseline patient and fracture characteristics, along with clinical and radiological outcomes between AFD initially immobilized with EF versus splinting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients with AFD temporarily immobilized using EF or splinting, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Quality of reduction (QOR) was assessed for each patient post-initial immobilization and after the definitive surgery. RESULTS: The study encompassed 194 patients: 138 treated with a splint (71.1%) and 56 (28.9%) with EF. Secondary loss of reduction had occurred in three patients who were splinted (2.2%). The mean ages in the EF and splint groups were 63.2 and 56.1 years, respectively (p = 0.01). Posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) and blisters were more prevalent in EF patients (69.6% vs. 43.5% for PMF and 76.8% vs. 20.3% for blisters, respectively; p = 0.05 and p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were 8.9% for EF versus 10.9% for splinting (p = 0.69). Satisfactory final QOR was attained in 79.8% of patients treated with a splint versus 64.3% with EF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients immobilized by EF presented with poorer baseline characteristics and had more unstable injuries. Nevertheless, postoperative complication rates were comparable. Thus, EF appears to be a valuable tool for standardizing outcomes in AFD patients with a less favorable prognosis.

Study on the effect of self-made fracture positioning compression guide device for posterior malleolus fracture surgery: Medical prevention.

To evaluate the effectiveness of a self-designed pressure-guided fracture positioning device, a prospective study was conducted in patients with posterior ankle fractures undergoing surgery using the device. Twenty-seven cases of ankle joint fracture with posterior malleolus fracture were treated by surgery. In the process of fixing posterior malleolus fracture, a self-designed fracture positioning compression guide device was used to fix posterior malleolus bone by anterior and posterior approaches. Postoperative CT images were used to assess the fixation position as well as length of the screw and the compression of the fracture. All patients had healed ankle fractures, and the anterior-posterior screws were fixed in the central area of the posterior malleolus. Posterior malleolus fragment displacement was <2 mm. The screw effectively secured the cortex beyond the length of the posterior malleolus cortex by no more than two threads. The good rate of ankle joint function was 85.16%. Compared to traditional surgical techniques, minimally invasive fixation using the self-designed positioning compression guide device has several advantages, including smaller trauma, faster postoperative recovery, and improved patient satisfaction. The device also provides the surgeon with greater control and precision during the surgical procedure, which can contribute to better surgical outcomes.

The arterial risk posed by the posterolateral approach: An anatomical cadaveric study of the fibular artery and its variability.

The posterior malleolus of the tibia is commonly accessed surgically through the posterolateral approach. This approach gives good access to the fibula and lateral aspect of the posterior tibia, however; there is little known on the vascular risks with this approach. The aim of this study was to assess and describe the anatomy of the fibular artery and its branches at the ankle region and relate it to the surgical access of the posterior malleolus. Eleven cadaveric foot and ankle specimens were dissected in layers, preserving the fibular artery, anterior tibial artery (ATA), and posterior tibial artery (PTA). Five distinct variations were found in the fibular artery: variable terminal branching with a hyperplastic fibular artery; a superficially located fibular artery; variation in the level and number of anastomoses; variation in the muscular branches; and a variable anterior perforating branch. The mean proximal distance from a horizontal line drawn through the medial protuberance of the medial malleolus of the tibia (horizontal line reference point-HLRP) to the posterior communicating branch of the fibular artery was 37.93 mm (range 19.03-85.43 mm). The mean proximal distance between HLRP and the anterior perforating branch of the fibular artery was 44.23 mm (range 35.44-62.32 mm). In 10 specimens, the fibular artery was immobile distal to its anterior perforating branch. The posterolateral approach specifically puts the fibular artery at risk and knowledge of its anatomy and variability is important when undertaking this approach. Understanding the common variations within the ankle's arterial anatomy can help surgeons protect these vessels from damage during the surgical approach.

Reproducibility of Bartonícek and Haraguchi classifications of the posterior malleolus fractures.

BACKGROUND: Two of the most commonly used classifications for the posterior malleolus fracture are Haraguchi and Bartonícek. Both classifications are based on the morphology of the fracture. This study makes an inter- and intra-observer agreement analysis of the mentioned classifications. METHODS: 39 patients with ankle fractures who met inclusion criteria were selected. All the fractures were analyzed and classified twice by each of the 20 observers using Bartonícek and Haraguchi's classifications, with a window period of at least 30 days between the two rounds. RESULTS: Analysis was made by Kappa coefficient (ƙ). The global intraobserver value was ƙ = 0.627 in the Bartonícek classification and ƙ = 0.644 in the Haraguchi one. The first round global interobserver ƙ = 0.589 (0.574-0.604) on the Bartonícek classification and ƙ = 0.534 (0.517-0.551) on the Haraguchi one. Second round coefficients were ƙ = 0.601 (0.585-0.616) and ƙ = 0.536 (0.519-0.554), respectively. The best agreement was when there was involvement of the posteromedial malleolar zone with ƙ = 0.686 and ƙ = 0.687 in Haraguchi II and ƙ = 0.641 and ƙ = 0.719 in Bartonícek III. No differences were observed in Kappa values when an experience-based analysis was made. CONCLUSION: Bartonícek and Haraguchi classifications of the posterior malleolus fracture have both substantial intraobserver agreement but moderate to substantial agreement in interobserver analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently involve the posterior malleolus. Many classifications describing posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) exist. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic literature review to outline existing PMF classifications and estimate their accuracy. METHODS: The databases PubMed and Scopus were searched without time limits. Only specific PMF classifications were included; general ankle and/or pilon fracture classifications were excluded. Selection and data extraction was performed by three independent observers. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies with a total of 12.614 patients were included. Four main classifications were identified: Those describing the size of the posterior malleolar fracture (n = 66), Haraguchi (n = 44), Bartonícek/Rammelt (n = 21) and Mason (n = 12). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a median Coleman-score of 43.5 (14-79) and a weighted median Coleman-score of 42.5 points. All classifications achieved a substantial to perfect score regarding the inter- and intraobserver reliability, with Mason scoring the lowest in comparison. CONCLUSIONS: None of the reviewed PMF classifications has been able to establish itself decisively in the literature. Most of the classifications are insufficient in terms of a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with regard to outcome. However, as the Bartonícek/Rammelt classification has the greatest potential due to its treatment algorithm, its reliability in combination with consistent predictive values, its usage in clinical practice and research appears advisable.

Posterolateral approach for posterior malleolus fixation in ankle fractures: functional and radiological outcome based on Bartonicek classification.

INTRODUCTION: Posterolateral approach has been advocated for the treatment of ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus and satisfactory results were demonstrated in several studies. The Bartonicek classification based on 3-dimensional CT scanning was commonly used for treatment recommendation of posterior malleolar fracture (PMF). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical effect of the posterolateral approach for the treatment of PMF and present outcomes of patients with different types of Bartonicek classification. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 72 patients with ankle fractures involving posterior malleolus (PM) from January 2016 to December 2018. Posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) were all directly reduced and fixed by a posterolateral approach using lag screws and/or buttress plates. AOFAS score and VAS pain score were used as the primary functional outcome measures. The radiographic evaluation included the quality of the reduction and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis classification. According to the CT-based Bartonicek classification, all patients were classified into three groups: 42 type II, 18 type III and 12 type IV. Bartonicek type II patients were further divided into subtype IIa 19 cases, subtype IIb 16 cases and subtype IIc 7 cases. The radiological and functional outcomes were analyzed among different types and subtypes of Bartonicek classification. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (94.5%) achieved good or excellent reduction of PMF after surgery. The mean AOFAS score was 81.35 ± 6.15 at 6 months and 90.56 ± 4.98 at the final follow-up, respectively. The VAS score was 6.62 ± 1.03 one week after surgery, and 1.20 ± 0.92 at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation at the final follow-up showed that primary bone union was achieved in all patients and 65 patients (88.9%) got no (KL grade 0) or just doubtable (KL grade 1) post-traumatic osteoarthritis. AOFAS scores decreased significantly with the severity of Bartonicek classification at 6 month (p < 0.001) and final follow-up (p < 0.05), while there was no statistical difference of VAS pain score among different types of Bartonicek classification. Reduction quality and the presence of osteoarthritis was not correlated to Bartonicek classification either. Besides, AOFAS scores at the final follow-up were statistically different among three subtypes of Bartonicek type II fractures (p < 0.05), and Bartonicek subtype IIa fractures had the highest AOFAS scores as 93 ± 4.99. Presence and severity of osteoarthritis was lower in patients with subtype IIa PMF compared to other subtype groups, this finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The posterolateral approach could achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of posterior malleolus fracture. Patients with a Bartonicek type II fracture had a better functional outcome measured by the AOFAS score compared to other types. Bartonicek type IIa fractures got a higher AOFAS score and a lower incidence of osteoarthritis at the final follow-up than the other two subtypes. Classification of PMFs according to the Bartonicek classification was reliable.

Difference in Joint Stability Between Small Posterior Malleolar Fragments With Fixation and Those Without Fixation: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study.

The indication for the surgical treatment of ankle fractures that involve a posterior malleolar fragment remains controversial. This cadaver study assessed the biomechanical results of rotation stiffness of Haraguchi type 1 posterior malleolar fragments with or without cannulated screw fixation. Twelve anatomic lower-extremity specimens from 6 cadavers were tested. Six right legs were subjected to posterior malleolus osteotomy (Haraguchi type I) followed with (group A; n = 3) or without (group B; n = 3) fixation using a cannulated screw. Ankle joint stability was measured under both external rotation force and axial loading, and the passive resistive torque was measured in both groups. The mean torque value in group A was 0.1093 Nm/º, while that in group B was 0.0537 Nm/º. There was a significant intergroup difference (p = .004). In group B, the torque value was further increased in the latter rotation period (about 40-60 degrees). Group A proved more stable under experimental conditions than group B. Fixation in type I posterior malleolar fragments produced improved stability in ankle rotation, even for posterior malleolar fragments involving <25% of the articular surface, and has been considered an effective aid in treatment.

Anatomy of the Sural Nerve in the Posterolateral Approach to the Ankle: A Cadaveric Study.

Sural nerve injury may occur during the posterolateral approach to the ankle during fracture fixation. We aimed to map its location in a posterolateral approach in cadaveric specimens. A posterolateral approach was used in 28 cadaver legs with the incision made halfway between the medial border of the fibula and the lateral border of Achilles tendon, extending proximally from the tip of the lateral malleolus. The sural nerve was identified and the distance from the distal tip of the incision to where it crossed the incision proximally was measured. The mean distance was 3.4 ± 1.2 (range 0.5-7.0) cm. In 22 cases (78.5%), the distance from the lowest part of the incision to the inferior part of the nerve was between 2.7 and 4.5 cm. The nerve did not cross the incision in 2 cases. We have demonstrated that the sural nerve crossed the posterolateral incision between 2.7 and 4.5 cm proximal to the tip of the fibula in the majority of cases. However, there remains individual anatomical variation, and we would recommend that care should be taken to look for the nerve closer to the Achilles tendon proximally and nearer the fibula distally. We hope that this information can help surgeons plan their approach and minimize iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve.

Middle-sized posterior malleolus fractures: Fixed versus non-fixed - A prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of fixation on functional and radiological outcomes of ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus. We hypothesized that fixation of the posterior malleolus would be associated with improved radiological and functional outcome. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was planned and 40 consecutive ankle fractures involving middle-sized (10-25%) posterior fragment were included. Posterior fragments in Group 1 were not fixated while Group 2 underwent posterior malleolus fixation. The patients were evaluated both functionally and radiologically at minimum 2-years. RESULTS: Demographics and fracture type distributions were similar between the groups. Despite the slightly better functional outcome in Group 2, no significant functional or radiological outcome difference could be detected. Articular step-off> 1 mm was more common in Group 1 (p = 0.04) and the patients with articular step-off showed significantly worse functional outcome in all functional parameters (p < 0.05). Radiological and functional outcome parameters were positively correlated when all patients were evaluated together. Lateral radiographs caused an overestimation in the size of posterior fragment compared to CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although there was a slightly better clinical outcome in patients with fixed posterior fragments, it was not significant at short to mid-term follow-up. However, posterior fragment fixation contributed to functional outcomes by decreasing the incidence of articular step-off> 1 mm, which was found to be a negative prognostic factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; prospective randomized controlled study.

Maisonneuve ankle fracture.

Maisonneuve fracture (MF) is defined as an ankle fracture-dislocation associated always with a fracture of the proximal quarter of the fibula and rupture of the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments. Other injuries are variable. Recent CT studies have demonstrated that MF is a far more complex injury than initially supposed. Therefore it is necessary to change substantially the current concepts related to this issue. MF is combined in about 80% of cases with a fracture of the posterior malleolus and also with malposition of the distal fibula in the fibular notch. An exact assessment of these injuries requires post-injury CT examination which should be used as a standard in MFs. The main goal of treatment is anatomical reduction of the distal fibula into the fibular notch. In case of avulsion of a larger fragment of the posterior malleolus, it is necessary to perform as the first step its reduction and fixation from the posterolateral approach and thus restore integrity of the notch. Closed reduction of the distal fibula is associated with malposition in up to 50% of cases and therefore open reduction from a short anterolateral approach is preferred. Accuracy of reduction should be always checked by postoperative CT scan.

Validation of three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle.

PURPOSE: A number of classification systems exist for posterior malleolar ankle fractures. The user reliability of these classification systems remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of three commonly utilised classification systems for fractures of the posterior malleolus. METHODS: Imaging of 60 patients across 2 hospitals with ankle fractures including a posterior malleolar fragment was identified. All patients had undergone plain radiographs and computed tomography of their injured ankle as part of their normal standard of care. 9 surgeons including pre-resident/registrar level, resident/registrar level, and attending/consultant level applied the Haraguchi, Bartonícek, and Mason classifications to these fractures, at two timepoints, at least 4 weeks apart. The order was randomised between assessments. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' κ and standard error (SE). Intra-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's κ and standard error (SE). RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' κ) was calculated for the Haraguchi classification as 0.588 (SE 0.023), for the Bartonícek classification as 0.626 (SE 0.019), and the Mason classification as 0.541 (SE 0.098). Intra-rater reliability (Cohen's κ) was 0.761 (SE 0.098) for the Haraguchi classification, 0.761 (SE 0.091) for the Bartonícek, classification, and 0.724 (SE 0.096) for the Mason classification. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures. Based on definitions by Landis and Koch (Biometrics 33:159-174, 1977), inter-rater reliability was rated as 'moderate' for the Haraguchi and Mason classifications and 'substantial' for the Bartonícek classification. Similarly, the intra-rater reliability was rated as 'substantial' for all three classifications.

Fractures of the posterior malleolus: a systematic review and analysis of patient-reported outcome scale selection.

PURPOSE: Despite the extensive use of PROs in ankle fracture research, no study has quantified which PROs are most commonly used for assessing outcomes of patients who sustain fractures of the posterior malleolus. The purpose of this study was therefore to quantify which PROs are most commonly used for outcome research after posterior malleolus fractures. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Articles were identified through Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and cochrane central register of controlled trials through May of 2021. Included articles were analyzed for the primary outcome of the most commonly reported PRO. RESULTS: The American orthopedic foot and ankle ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) was the most commonly used PRO for assessment of posterior malleolus fracture outcomes, used in 37 of 72 studies (51.4%). The second and third most common were the olerud-molander ankle score (OMAS) (22 studies, 30.6%) and the visual analogue score (VAS) (21 studies, 29.2%). Eleven different PROs were used only once. Quality of evidence was graded as low given the percentage of studies that were observational or case series (68 of 72 studies, 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Investigators have used many different PROs to assess outcomes for posterior malleolus fractures, the most common of which are the AOFAS, OMAS, and VAS. Future investigators should attempt to unify outcome reporting for these injuries.

Distal articular involvement in tibial shaft fractures: an evaluation of 125 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and morphology of ipsilateral distal articular involvement (DAI) in a consecutive series of tibial shaft fractures. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed on 115 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for tibia shaft fractures. Ankle evaluations included preoperative radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (27.8%) in our series presented with tibial shaft fractures associated with DAI. Tibial spiral fractures (42A1) were significantly related to DAI (RR: 1788). In 28 (87.5%; 28/32) articular fractures, posterior malleolus fractures (PMF) were present; 22 were isolated, and six (18.8%) occurred in combination with medial malleolus or anterolateral fractures. The remaining (12.5%; 4/32) were isolated medial malleolus fractures. Ten (31.2%; 10/32) articular fractures were occult on the radiographs and only detected on CT scan. CONCLUSION: DAI is common in tibial shaft fractures. CT evaluation is mandatory due to the high number of occult fractures. Although isolated PMF is the most frequent pattern of DAI involvement, 31.3% of the cases exhibited different patterns.

Open fixation of the posterior malleolus increases the morbidity of trimalleolar ankle fracture fixation.

PURPOSE: To assess the morbidity of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) in the setting of trimalleolar ankle fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 79 trimalleolar ankle fractures was performed to identify need for syndesmotic fixation, blood loss, operative/tourniquet time, complications, and reoperations. Patients with PMF ORIF (n = 38) were compared to those with no fixation (n = 41). A subanalysis of patients with small PMFs (< 25%) was performed. RESULTS: The PMF ORIF group required less syndesmosis fixation (proportional difference (PD) - 44.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 61.8 to - 23.0%), had more blood loss (MD 20 ml, CI 0-40), longer operative times (MD 53.0 min, CI 35.9-70.1), longer tourniquet times (MD 26 min, CI 4-33), and had no difference in postoperative joint step-off or concentrically reduced joints. The PMF ORIF group had more postoperative complications (PD 26.9%, CI 6.3-44.8%) and a trend for more reoperations (PD 13.6%, CI -3.4 to 29.6%). Wound complications were more common in the PMF ORIF group (PD 26.5%, CI 6.9-43.6%), resulting in 5 (16.1%) irrigation and debridement procedures. On analysis of patients with small PMFs (n = 42), PMF ORIF (n = 15) resulted in longer operative/tourniquet times and had no observed difference in postoperative joint step-off, concentrically reduced joints, need for syndesmotic fixation, blood loss, or complications/reoperations. CONCLUSION: PMF ORIF in the setting of trimalleolar ankle fractures was associated with increased operative/tourniquet times, blood loss, wound complications, and did not eliminate the need for syndesmosis fixation.