Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: In the era of rising antimicrobial resistance and successful protocols for empiric and prophylactic antimicrobial therapy in elective surgical procedures, it is important to consider the specific needs of the trauma population based on injury location, severity, and environmental exposures. In this study, we aim to compare outcomes of high-activation trauma patients who received antibiotics during initial evaluation with those who did not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients focusing on antimicrobial administration who presented as the highest trauma activation criteria during the year 2021 was conducted at a single urban institution. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data ere collected through manual data abstraction from our institutional trauma registry. RESULTS: Nearly half of all trauma patients in our study received antibiotics after initial evaluation and age was found to be significantly associated with antibiotic administration within the first 1.5 h. Young men with penetrating injuries were more likely to receive antibiotic treatment. Seventy-eight percent of patients who received early antibiotics underwent a procedure, while 61% of those who did not receive early antibiotics did not (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of individualizing antibiotic treatment based on the patient's age and specific injury pattern. They also underscore the need for trauma providers to prioritize antibiotic stewardship.

Antibiotic utilization in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a multi-institutional study and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Utilization of antibiotics for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) is largely dependent on individual surgeon preference. This study aimed to investigate prescribing practices of pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics and effects on postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent endo-DCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of institutional data at two academic centers of endo-DCR cases from 2015-2020 was performed. Postoperative infection rates for patients who received pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics, individually or in combination, and those who did not, were compared via odds ratio and ANOVA linear regression. RESULTS: 331 endo-DCR cases were included; 22 cases (6.6%) had a postoperative infection. There was no significant difference in the infection rates between patients without an active preoperative dacryocystitis who received different permutations of peri- and postoperative antibiotics. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics within two weeks of surgery for preexisting acute dacryocystitis, but did not receive peri- or postoperative antibiotics, had a higher rate of postoperative infections (p = 008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest antibiotics may be beneficial only when patients have a recent or active dacryocystitis prior to surgery. Otherwise, our data do not support the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in endo-DCR.

PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS DURING THE IMPLANT PROSTHETIC PHASE MAY NOT SUBSTANTIALLY DECREASE THE INCIDENCE OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Does the Prosthetic Phase of Dental Implants Justify the Prescription of Preventive Antibiotics in Healthy Patients? A Systematic Review. Salgado-Peralvo AO, Uribarri A, Peña-Cardelles JF, Kewalramani N, Rodríguez JLG, Velasco-Ortega E. J Oral Implantol. 2023 Feb 1;49(1):93-101. SOURCE OF FUNDING: The authors declared that no funding was received to support the study. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review.

Factors associated with infection after operative vaginal birth-a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal birth.

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal birth showed that women allocated prophylactic intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid had a significantly lower risk of developing confirmed or suspected infection within 6 weeks after operative vaginal birth (risk ratio [RR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.69; P < .001). Some international and national guidelines have subsequently been updated to include prophylactic antibiotics after operative vaginal birth. However, the generalizability of the trial results may be limited in settings where the episiotomy rate is lower (89% of women in the trial had an episiotomy). In addition, there was a high burden of infection in the prophylactic antibiotics group despite the administration of prophylactic antibiotics. It is essential to identify modifiable risk factors for infection after operative vaginal birth, including the timing of antibiotic administration. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if the effectiveness of the prophylactic antibiotic in reducing confirmed or suspected infection was independent of perineal trauma, identify risk factors for infection after operative vaginal birth, and investigate variation in efficacy with the timing of antibiotic administration. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a secondary analysis of 3225 women with primary outcome data from the prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal birth randomized controlled trial. Women were divided into subgroups according to the perineal trauma experienced (episiotomy and/or perineal tear). The consistency of the prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infection across the subgroups was assessed using log-binomial regression and the likelihood ratio test. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to investigate factors associated with infection. The multivariable risk factor model was subsequently fitted to the group of women who received amoxicillin and clavulanic acid to investigate the timing of antibiotic administration. RESULTS: Of the 3225 women included in the secondary analysis, 2144 (66.5%) had an episiotomy alone, 726 (22.5%) had an episiotomy and a tear, 277 (8.6%) had a tear alone, and 78 (2.4%) had neither episiotomy nor tear. Among women who experienced perineal trauma, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid administration was protective against infection in all subgroups compared with placebo with no significant interaction between subgroup and trial allocation (P=.17). Moreover, 2925 women were included in the multivariable risk factor analysis. The following were associated with adjusted risk ratios of infection: episiotomy, 2.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.62-5.31); forceps, 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.69) compared to vacuum extraction; primiparity, 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.70); amoxicillin and clavulanic acid administration, 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.72); body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.47), and body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2, 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.52) compared to body mass index of <25 kg/m2. Each 15-minute increment between birth and antibiotic administration was associated with a 3% higher risk of infection (adjusted risk ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06). CONCLUSION: Timely prophylactic antibiotics should be administered to all women after operative vaginal birth, irrespective of the type of perineal trauma. The use of episiotomy, forceps birth, primiparity, and overweight were associated with an increased risk of confirmed or suspected infection after operative vaginal birth.

The efficacy and safety of prophylactic antibiotics for post-acute stroke infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Infections are common complications after stroke and associated with unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic antibiotics for post-acute stroke infection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and clinical trial register platforms from inception to 15 February 2022. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic antibiotics. Primary outcomes were mortality rate and incidence of pneumonia. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean differences with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random or fixed-effect model depending on heterogeneity. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. RESULTS: Twelve studies (4809 participants) were included. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate (12 trials, n = 4740, RR 1.03 [95% Cl: 0.91-1.16], high-quality evidence), incidence of pneumonia (7 trials, n = 4352, RR 0.94 [95% CI: 0.79-1.11], high-quality evidence) and the incidence of adverse events between the prophylactic antibiotics and control groups. Prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of infections (8 trials, n = 4517, RR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58-0.89], moderate-quality evidence) and urinary tract infections (7 trials, n = 4352, RR 0.39 [95% CI: 0.3-0.49], moderate-quality evidence). None of the subgroup analyses showed a significant difference in mortality or the incidence of pneumonia. CONCLUSION: For acute stroke patients, prophylactic antibiotics were significantly associated with fewer incidences of any infections and urinary tract infections without significant differences in mortality rate and pneumonia.

Urinary tract infections after retrograde pyelography and prophylactic antibiotics.

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde pyelography (RP) is performed for examination of upper urinary tract cancers and hydronephrosis. Although urinary tract infections (UTI) are known to be complicated by the examination, there are few reports on the frequency of occurrence and prophylactic antibiotics. METHODS: The incidence of UTI and febrile UTI (f-UTI) and patient background information were compared in 388 patients who underwent RP at our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. We also examined the administration of pre-RP antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the 388 patients who underwent RP, 27 (6.9%) had UTI and 17 (4.4%) had f-UTI. Of the 27 UTI cases, 25 (92.6%) were pyelonephritis; 20 (74.0%) were hospitalized and 2 (7.4%) presented with septic shock and were managed in the intensive care unit. When comparing the background of patients with UTI, no significant differences were found in the present study, but when limited to the 17 cases of f-UTI, the presence of hydronephrosis before RP and not prescribing antibiotics before RP were associated with significantly higher incidence of f-UTI (p = 0.019, p = 0.036, respectively). Especially for patients without pyuria and bacteriuria before RP, prescribing antibiotics before RP resulted in 0 cases of f-UTI (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study showed that the presence of hydronephrosis before RP and not prescribing prophylactic antibiotics before RP are risk factors for f-UTI.

The five-year trends in antibiotic prescription by dentists and antibiotic prophylaxis for tooth extraction: a region-wide claims study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship in dentistry and antibiotic prophylaxis for tooth extraction have been areas of concern in Japan, with limited research available. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized the regional health insurance claims database in Japan to examine antibiotic prescription trends by dentists, including antibiotic regimens, timing of prescription, and days of supply for prophylactic antibiotic use during tooth extraction. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with prosthetic heart valves was also investigated. FINDINGS: Antibiotic prescriptions by dentists decreased by 7% in 2019 compared to those in 2015, with third-generation cephalosporins still accounting for 48.5% in 2019. Amoxicillin prescription increased 3.9 times in 2019, although it only accounted for 8.4% of all antibiotic prescriptions. In 2019, amoxicillin was prescribed for 17.1% of all prophylactic antibiotics associated with tooth extraction, and 80% of prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed for 3 days or more, with 85% prescribed on the day of the procedure. However, only 60-70% of patients with prosthetic heart valves received antibiotic prophylaxis. INTERPRETATION: Despite the increasing trend after the implementation of the National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance, the proportion of amoxicillin prescriptions in dentistry remains low. Antimicrobial stewardship issues related to long-term prescription and timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for tooth extraction should be addressed. Dentists must recognize the risks associated with high-risk patients with prosthetic heart valves who require antibiotic prophylaxis, and physicians providing valve replacement therapy should inform patients of the requirement for prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures.

Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Prophylactic antibiotics has no benefit for outcome in clean myringoplasty-A register-based cohort study from SwedEar.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if prophylactic antibiotics (PA) in conjunction with myringoplasty of clean and uninfected ears entails a reduction of postoperative infections within 6 weeks after surgery, and whether it affects the healing rate of the tympanic membrane (TM) at follow-up, 6-24 months after surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Data extracted from The Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery (SwedEar), the years 2013-2019. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in SwedEar with a registered clean conventional myringoplasty (tympanoplasty type I) including a follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of PA use on TM healing rate at follow-up and postoperative infection within 6 weeks of surgery. RESULTS: In the study group (n = 1665) 86.2% had a healed TM at follow-up. There was no significant difference between the groups that had PA administered (87.2%) or not (86.1%). A total of 8.0% had a postoperative infection within 6 weeks. Postoperative infection occurred in 10.2% of the group that received PA (n = 187) compared with 7.7% of the group that did not receive PA. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative infection within 6 weeks significantly lowered the frequency of healed TMs. CONCLUSION: PA administered during clean conventional myringoplasty does not improve the chance of having a healed TM at follow up, nor decrease the risk of having a postoperative infection within 6 weeks after surgery.

The role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective inguinal tension-free hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whether to use antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection in elective inguinal tension-free hernia repair has been controversial. To systematically evaluate the effect of prophylactic antibiotic application in elective inguinal tension-free hernia repair, we identified all published randomised controlled trials of the effect of prophylactic antibiotic application on elective inguinal tension-free hernia repair were collected by computer retrieval from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure; VIP Database; Wanfang Database; China Biomedical Literature Database; and PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. The meta-analysis showed that the total incidence of surgical site infections [P = 0.003] and the incidence of superficial surgical site infections [P = 0.004] in the antibiotic group (AG) were lower than those in the non-antibiotic group (NAG). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative infections [P = 0.06], deep surgical site infections [P = 0.26] and seroma [P = 0.52] between the AG and the NAG. Based on current evidence, the application of prophylactic antibiotics in elective inguinal tension-free hernia repair can prevent the total incidence of surgical site infections and that of superficial surgical site infections but cannot prevent the total incidence of postoperative infection events, incidence of deep surgical site infections and incidence of seroma.

Infective Endocarditis Among High-risk Individuals Before and After the Cessation of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dentistry: A National Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A few years after the publication of the British guidelines, national recommendations were published by the Swedish Medical Products Agency in October 2012, promoting the cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis in dentistry for the prevention of infective endocarditis (IE). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the incidence of oral streptococcal IE increased among high-risk individuals after October 2012. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study included all adult individuals (>17 years) living in Sweden from January 2008 to January 2018, with a diagnose code or surgical procedure code indicating high risk of IE. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to calculate adjusted ratios of oral streptococcal IE before and after October 2012 between high-risk individuals and references. RESULTS: This study found no increased incidence of oral streptococcal IE among high-risk individuals during the 5 years after the cessation, compared with before. Hazard rate ratios were 15.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3-28.5) before and 20.7 (95% CI: 10.0-42.7) after October 2012 for prevalent high-risk individuals. Corresponding ratios for incident high-risk individuals were 66.8 (95% CI: 28.7-155.6) and 44.6 (95% CI: 22.9-86.9). Point estimates for interaction with time period were 1.4 (95% CI: .6-3.5) and 0.8 (95% CI: .5-1.3) for prevalent and incident high-risk individuals, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the current Swedish recommendation not to administer antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of IE in dentistry has not led to an increased incidence of oral streptococcal IE among high-risk individuals.

Antibiotic use in gastrointestinal surgery patients at a Vietnamese national hospital.

BACKGROUND: Invasive gastrointestinal surgery may be performed as an open or endoscopic procedure, such as laparoscopic semi-colon surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and anal surgery, among other such operations. Regardless of the approach, the operative procedure interferes with the patient's gastrointestinal tract, necessitating the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics to improve treatment outcomes and minimize postoperative infections. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic usage in patients who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery, and to identify factors associated with postoperative infection. DESIGN: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 112 patients who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery at the Department of Gastroenterology, Thong Nhat Hospital. We conducted a cross-sectional study in all inpatients aged 18 years and older, who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery between January 2020 and December 2020. We recorded patient characteristics, the administration and appropriateness of antibiotics, as well as treatment outcomes. The appropriateness of prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic usage was assessed based on 2015 Vietnamese national guideline for antibiotic use. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with postoperative infection. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 59.7 ± 17.2 years. Most surgeries (89.3%) were clean-contaminated procedures. The rates of appropriate types of antibiotics selected, doses, and overall rates of appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis were 68.0%, 76.4% and 54.7%, respectively. Of the patients investigated, 34.8% had at least one sign of postoperative infection; the overall appropriate rate of postoperative antibiotic was 38.5%. Old age was associated with postoperative infection and longer length of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the guidelines recommended for the prophylactic and therapeutic use of antibiotics is essential to improve treatment outcomes.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24-31 weeks' gestation: Perinatal and 2-year outcomes in the EPIPAGE-2 cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To compare different antibiotic prophylaxis administered after preterm premature rupture of membranes to determine whether any were associated with differences in obstetric and/or neonatal outcomes and/or neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age. DESIGN: Prospective, nationwide, population-based EPIPAGE-2 cohort study of preterm infants. SETTING: France, 2011. SAMPLE: We included 492 women with a singleton pregnancy and a diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24-31 weeks. Exclusion criteria were contraindication to expectant management or indication for antibiotic therapy other than preterm premature rupture of membranes. Antibiotic prophylaxis was categorised as amoxicillin (n = 345), macrolide (n = 30), third-generation cephalosporin (n = 45) or any combinations covering Streptococcus agalactiae and >90% of Escherichia coli (n = 72), initiated within 24 hours after preterm premature rupture of membranes. METHODS: Population-averaged robust Poisson models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival at discharge without severe neonatal morbidity, 2-year neurodevelopment. RESULTS: With amoxicillin, macrolide, third-generation cephalosporin and combinations, 78.5%, 83.9%, 93.6% and 86.0% of neonates were discharged alive without severe morbidity. The administration of third-generation cephalosporin or any E. coli-targeting combinations was associated with improved survival without severe morbidity (adjusted risk ratio 1.25 [95% confidence interval 1.08-1.45] and 1.10 [95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.20], respectively) compared with amoxicillin. We evidenced no increase in neonatal sepsis related to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant pathogen. CONCLUSION: In preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24-31 weeks, antibiotic prophylaxis based on third-generation cephalosporin may be associated with improved survival without severe neonatal morbidity when compared with amoxicillin, with no evidence of increase in neonatal sepsis related to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant pathogen. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Antibiotic prophylaxis after PPROM at 24-31 weeks: 3rd-generation cephalosporins associated with improved neonatal outcomes.

Periodic quadriplegia during the acute postoperative phase of cervical laminoplasty: a case report and literature review.

The use of antibiotics can, in rare cases, induce neuromuscular blockade (NMB), resulting in paralytic symptoms. Although such antibiotic-induced NMB has been described in the anaesthesiology and infectious disease literature, it is an unfamiliar clinical entity in the fields of neurosurgery and spinal surgery. Herein, we report a case of periodic quadriplegia due to NMB induced by perioperative prophylactic antibiotic of cefazolin, resulting in highly confusing paralytic symptoms during the acute postoperative phase of cervical laminoplasty, together with a review of the relevant literature.

Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: What, When, and How.

Although there are numerous nonpatient-related factors that may help reduce infection risk, the proper use of prophylactic antibiotics is most responsible for reducing infection. The role of prophylactic antibiotics is to reduce early periprosthetic joint replacement, which is accomplished by having adequate antibiotic tissue levels at the time of skin incision. The goal of this section of the symposium is to review current antibiotic recommendations, how to manage patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy, review the use of dual antibiotics, discuss the use of antibiotics in the outpatient total joint setting, as well as very briefly discuss the administration of intraosseous antibiotics in knee arthroplasty.

Antibiotic prophylaxis as a quality of care indicator: does it help in the fight against surgical site infections following fragility hip fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Fragility hip fractures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. To improve patient care, quality indicator programs were introduced. Yet, the efficacy of these programs and specific quality indicators are questioned. We aimed to determine whether defining prophylactic pre-surgical antibiotic treatment as a quality indicator affected hip fracture outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing consecutive patients, 65 years and older, who were operated for fragility hip fractures between 01/01/2011 and 30/06/2016, before and after the prophylactic pre-surgical antibiotic treatment quality indicator, which was introduced in 01/2014. Primary outcomes were 1-year surgical site infections (SSI). Secondary outcomes were meeting the quality index and mortality rates, either within a hospital or during the first post-operative year. RESULTS: 904 patients, ages 82.5 ± 7.2 years were operated for fragility hip fractures. 403 patients presented before the antibiotic prophylaxis quality indicator, and 501 following its administration. Patients demographics were comparable. In the pre-quality indicator period, documentation of prophylactic antibiotic treatment was lacking. Only 19.6% had a record for antibiotic administration in their surgical records and for merely 10.4% the type of antibiotic was stated. However, in the post-quality indicator period, 97.0% of patients had a registered prophylactic antibiotic regimen in the hour preceding the surgical incision (p < 0.001). Post-operative SSI rates were equivalent, and as were in-hospital infections, mortality and recurrent hospitalizations CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the pre-operative antibiotic treatment quality indicator increased the documentation of antibiotic administration yet failed to influence the incidence of post-operative orthopaedic and medical infections in fragility hip fracture patients.

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an IgG subclass deficiency (IgSD) ± specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD) often present with recurrent infections. Previous retrospective studies have shown that prophylactic antibiotics (PA) and immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) can both be effective in preventing these infections; however, this has not been confirmed in a prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of PA and IRT in a randomized crossover trial. METHODS: A total of 64 patients (55 adults and 9 children) were randomized (2:2) between two treatment arms. Treatment arm A began with 12 months of PA, and treatment arm B began with 12 months of IRT. After a 3-month bridging period with cotrimoxazole, the treatment was switched to 12 months of IRT and PA, respectively. The efficacy (measured by the incidence of infections) and proportion of related adverse events in the two arms were compared. RESULTS: The overall efficacy of the two regimens did not differ (p = 0.58, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A smaller proportion of patients suffered a related adverse event while using PA (26.8% vs. 60.3%, p < 0.0003, chi-squared test). Patients with persistent infections while using PA suffered fewer infections per year after switching to IRT (2.63 vs. 0.64, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We found comparable efficacy of IRT and PA in patients with IgSD ± SPAD. Patients with persistent infections during treatment with PA had less infections after switching to IRT. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Given the costs and associated side-effects of IRT, it should be reserved for patients with persistent infections despite treatment with PA.

Infectious Complications Predict Premature CD8+ T-cell Senescence in CD40 Ligand-Deficient Patients.

PURPOSE: CD40 ligand (CD40L)-deficient patients display increased susceptibilities to infections that can be mitigated with effective prophylactic strategies including immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement and prophylactic antibiotics. CD8+ T-cell senescence has been described in CD40L deficiency, but it is unclear if this is an intrinsic feature of the disease or secondary to infectious exposures. To address this question, we assessed CD8+ T-cell senescence and its relationship to clinical histories, including prophylaxis adherence and infections, in CD40L-deficient patients. METHODS: Peripheral CD8+ T-cells from seven CD40L-deficient patients and healthy controls (HCs) were assessed for senescent features using T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) analysis, flow cytometry, cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) and in vitro functional determinations including CMV-specific proliferation and cytokine release assays. RESULTS: Three patients (5, 28, and 34 years old) who were poorly adherent to immunoglobulin G replacement and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis and/or experienced multiple childhood pneumonias (patient group 1) had an expansion of effector memory CD8+ T-cells with the senescent phenotype when compared to HCs. Such changes were not observed in the patient group 2 (four patients, 16, 22, 24, and 33 years old) who were life-long adherents to prophylaxis and experienced few infectious complications. CyTOF analysis of CD8+ T-cells from the 5-year-old patient and older adult HCs showed similar expression patterns of senescence-associated molecules. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that recurrent infections and non-adherence to prophylaxis promote early CD8+ T-cell senescence in CD40L deficiency. Premature senescence may increase malignant susceptibilities and further exacerbate infectious risk in CD40L-deficient patients.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in ERCP with failed cannulation.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with failed biliary cannulation is associated with a high rate of adverse events, but the role of prophylactic antibiotics remains unclear. The primary aim was to investigate if prophylactically administered antibiotics affect the frequency of overall adverse complications in patients where biliary cannulation fails during ERCP. The secondary aim was to investigate if specific infectious complications, also were affected by the antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed data from 96,818 ERCPs (2006-2018), from the Swedish National Quality Registry of Cholecystectomy and ERCP (GallRiks), excluding ERCPs with successful cannulation (n = 88,743), missing data (n = 2,014), or on-going antibiotic therapy (n = 1,062). RESULTS: In total 4,996 procedures were included, 2,124 received (42.5%) and 2,872 (57.5%) did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. There were fewer overall complications in the group receiving prophylaxis (13.6% vs. 17.1%, p < .001), which corresponded to a 24% adjusted odds reduction in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.89). In the prophylaxis group, there was a lower overall rate of infectious complications (2.1% vs. 3.2%; p = .038; OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.98) and abscesses (0.8% vs. 1.4%; p = .040; OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.96). However, no significant differences were seen in the rate of cholangitis (1.3% vs. 1.7%; p = .182; OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.46-1.18). CONCLUSION: This national quality registry study of ERCPs with failed cannulation showed a significant reduction in overall and infectious complications when prophylactic antibiotics were administered.

Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing genital tract infection in women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Findings about the effect of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing genital tract infection (GTI) associated with surgical procedures used for incomplete abortions are conflicting. Some reported a decrease in infection associated with the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas others found no significant reduction in GTI. OBJECTIVE: To synthesise systematically the evidence on the effect of prophylactic antibiotics compared with placebo in women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion. SEARCH STRATEGY: In February 2020, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central for Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant published randomised controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials reporting GTI following surgical procedures for incomplete abortion and comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta-analysis using inverse variance heterogeneity model included subgroup and sensitivity analyses determined a priori were conducted. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). MAIN RESULTS: A total of 16 178 women who participated in 24 eligible randomised controlled trials published between 1975 and 2019 were included. Pooled estimates showed the risk of GTI following surgical procedures after incomplete abortion was significantly lower among those who had prophylactic antibiotics (relative risk [RR] = 0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.90; I2  = 49%). There was no significant effect of antibiotics in women in low- and middle-income countries (three studies, 3579 participants, RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.50-1.62; I2  = 63%), but it was clinically and statistically significant among women high-income countries (21 studies, 12 599 participants, RR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.53-0.84; I2  = 44%), with a strong level of evidence as assessed by GRADE. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in reducing post-abortion GTI among women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion. More studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Prophylactic antibiotics after incomplete abortion are effective in reducing GTI. More studies are needed from low- and middle-income countries.