Post-chemo-radiotherapy response and pseudo-progression evaluation on glioma cell types by multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We focused on Differentiated pseudoprogression (PPN) of progression (PN) and the response to radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using diffusion and metabolic imaging. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with glioma were included in this prospective study (approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20230904059352N1) in September 2023). Contrast-enhanced lesion volume (CELV), non-enhanced lesion volume (NELV), necrotic tumor volume (NTV), and quantitative values ​​of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and NAA/Cr) were calculated by a neuroradiologist using a semi-automatic method. All patients were followed at one and six months after CRT. RESULTS: The results of the study showed statistically significant changes before and six months after RT-CRT for M-CELV in all glioma types (𝑝 < 0.05). In glioma cell types, the changes in M-ADC, M-Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA indices for PN were incremental and greater for PPN patients. M-NAA/Cr ratio decreased after six months which was significant only on PN for GBM, and Epn (𝑝 < 0.05). A significant difference was observed between diffusion indices, metabolic ratios, and CELV changes after six months in all types (𝑝 < 0.05). None of the patients were suspected PPN one month after treatment. The DWI/ADC indices had higher sensitivity and specificity (98.25% and 96.57%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed that ADC values and Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios can be used to differentiate between patients with PPN and PN, although ADC is more sensitive and specific.

Delayed yet effective response of an endolymphatic sac tumor to radiosurgery: case report focusing on its radio-biological behavior.

Endolymphatic sac tumors (ELST), though benign are locally invasive lesions. Owing to its vascularity, complete surgical resection is often not possible and adjuvant gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is advocated to control tumor growth. These lesions do not uniformly respond to radiation therapy in the initial phase and their early radiobiological course after GKRS is less understood. We discuss a case of residual ELST where a mild increase was noted at 36 months following GKRS and then regressed completely after a decade. This report possibly has the longest follow-up revealing the true efficacy of GKRS in these tumors. ELST shows a variable response in the early years after GKRS. They may remain static, regress or increase in size. One should be aware of these patterns of early radiological responses and a long term follow up is warranted as some lesions may show radiosurgical effectiveness after a long latent period.

[Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: early and long-term radiation-induced changes and tumor growth control]. / Radiokhirurgiya vestibulyarnykh shvannom: dinamika blizhaishikh i otdalennykh postluchevykh izmenenii i kontrol' opukholevogo rosta.

Stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma is an effective and safe method of treatment. The phenomenon of schwannoma pseudo-progression (transient post-radiation enlargement) complicates assessment of the outcomes after radiosurgery. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes of vestibular schwannoma in different periods after radiosurgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed early and long-term radiation-induced changes in 333 patients who received Gamma Knife treatment at the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center between April 2005 and December 2015. Mean follow-up period was 60 months (range 15-167). There were 89 men (26.7%) and 244 (73.4%) women. Mean age of patients was 48.2 years. Mean baseline tumor volume was 4.1 cm3 (range 0.1-14.5). Dynamics of changes was assessed using volumetric comparison. RESULTS: Tumor shrinkage without pseudo-progression was observed in 149 (44.7%) patients. Typical pseudo-progression in different variants was found in 131 (39.3%) patients, i.e. short-term (1 year) and long-term (≥2 years) course, complete and incomplete process. Eleven patients had atypical pseudo-progression after initial tumor shrinkage. Progression-free 5- and 10-year survival in the entire group was 87 and 81%, respectively. Progression-free 5-year survival rate was 95 and 92% in patients with and without pseudo-progression, respectively. Ten-year survival rate was 89 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of pseudo-progression features is essential for the most reasonable and reliable assessment of treatment results and justification of timing and frequency of subsequent MR control. Atypical course of pseudo-progression can simulate tumor recurrence. In case of tumor enlargement at any follow-up stage after radiosurgery, advisability of surgery should be determined considering clinical data and likelihood of tumor shrinkage following natural regression of post-radiation tumor enlargement.

Histopathology-validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Imaging of glioblastoma patients after maximal safe resection and chemoradiation commonly demonstrates new enhancements that raise concerns about tumor progression. However, in 30% to 50% of patients, these enhancements primarily represent the effects of treatment, or pseudo-progression (PsP). We hypothesize that quantitative machine learning analysis of clinically acquired multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can identify subvisual imaging characteristics to provide robust, noninvasive imaging signatures that can distinguish true progression (TP) from PsP. METHODS: We evaluated independent discovery (n = 40) and replication (n = 23) cohorts of glioblastoma patients who underwent second resection due to progressive radiographic changes suspicious for recurrence. Deep learning and conventional feature extraction methods were used to extract quantitative characteristics from the mpMRI scans. Multivariate analysis of these features revealed radiophenotypic signatures distinguishing among TP, PsP, and mixed response that compared with similar categories blindly defined by board-certified neuropathologists. Additionally, interinstitutional validation was performed on 20 new patients. RESULTS: Patients who demonstrate TP on neuropathology are significantly different (P < .0001) from those with PsP, showing imaging features reflecting higher angiogenesis, higher cellularity, and lower water concentration. The accuracy of the proposed signature in leave-one-out cross-validation was 87% for predicting PsP (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92) and 84% for predicting TP (AUC, 0.83), whereas in the discovery/replication cohort, the accuracy was 87% for predicting PsP (AUC, 0.84) and 78% for TP (AUC, 0.80). The accuracy in the interinstitutional cohort was 75% (AUC, 0.80). CONCLUSION: Quantitative mpMRI analysis via machine learning reveals distinctive noninvasive signatures of TP versus PsP after treatment of glioblastoma. Integration of the proposed method into clinical studies can be performed using the freely available Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit.

The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists' agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. METHODS: A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. RESULTS: Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22-0.24)]. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting.

Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: Incidence, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Opportunities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a major dose-limiting adverse event of radiotherapy. The incidence rate of RN varies with the radiotherapy modality, total dose, dose fractionation, and the nature of the lesion being targeted. In addition to these known and controllable features, there is a stochastic component to the occurrence of CRN-the genetic profile of the host or the lesion and their role in the development of CRN. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies provide some insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying radiation-induced brain injury. In addition to these incompletely understood host factors, the diagnostic criteria for CRN using structural and functional imaging are also not clear, though multiple structural and functional imaging modalities exist, a combination of which may prove to be the ideal diagnostic imaging approach. As the utilization of novel molecular therapies and immunotherapy increases, the incidence of CNR is expected to increase and its diagnosis will become more challenging. Tissue biopsies can be insensitive and suffer from sampling biases and procedural risks. Liquid biopsies represent a promising, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic strategy, though this modality is currently in its infancy. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of CRN will expand and optimize the diagnosis and management of CRN by better utilizing existing treatment options including bevacizumab, pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and laser interstitial thermal therapy.

From a Patient Advocate's Perspective: Does Cancer Immunotherapy Represent a Paradigm Shift?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) announced immunotherapy as the year's top cancer advance in its "Clinical Cancer Advances 2016: ASCO's Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer." Further, ASCO again named "Immunotherapy 2.0" as the 2017 advance of the year, emphasizing the recent, rapid pace of research into new agents that harness and enhance the innate abilities of the immune system to recognize and fight cancers-and stressing that such agents have extended the lives of many patients with late-stage cancers for which there have been few treatment options. This article discusses the history of cancer immunotherapy and the recent promising advances, yet also presents a note of caution on limitations of immunotherapies, their potential harms, and the critical need for oncologists to appropriately engage with and educate patients to effectively manage their expectations. RECENT FINDINGS: Learning how to effectively harness the immune system to treat cancer represents an investigative journey of more than 100 years. However, after many failures and disappointments, this decade has seen several important successes. In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first immunotherapy agent known as a "checkpoint inhibitor." Beginning in 2014, several additional checkpoint blockage drugs have been FDA-approved, and new indications and drug combinations have emerged. Further, on August 30, 2017, the FDA announced its first approval of a new form of immunotherapy known as CAR T cell therapy. Since the 2011 approval of the first checkpoint inhibitor, cancer immunotherapy research among the pharmaceutical industry and research institutions has exploded, with thousands of clinical trials currently taking place. The current "cancer immunotherapy revolution" is in the headlines daily and is also the primary topic of conversation among major cancer research conferences and symposia attendees. However, a once quiet voice has begun to emerge, where an increasing number of scientists, clinicians, and patient advocates are stressing the need for caution concerning the limitations and potential harms associated with cancer immunotherapy. Many oncologists, scientists, medical professional associations, and advocates agree that no recent cancer advance has been as successful, transformative, and potentially paradigm-shifting as immunotherapy. With this decade, we have seen the approval of several immunotherapy agents that have successfully treated a percentage of patients with notoriously resistant cancers, an increasing number of combination immunotherapy treatments, and new indications for approved agents. However, patients need to be aware that much of the popular media has breathlessly inflated positive outcomes of cancer immunotherapies, while neglecting to stress that just a small percentage of patients actually benefit from such treatments. Further, they often completely overlook the unique, potentially life-threatening harms that may be associated with these agents and fail to cover negative findings where immunotherapies have appeared to paradoxically accelerate cancer growth. Fortunately, the majority of journal articles presenting trial results and comprehensive review articles appropriately discuss the important limitations associated with immunotherapies, the unique spectrum of adverse effects, and the need for further research to improve our ability to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents, sparing other patients from exposure to agents that will not be effective, yet may carry potentially life-threatening toxicities.

Rapid response in relapsed follicular lymphoma to novel anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy with pseudo-progression and cytomegalovirus infection: A case report.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been shown to achieve a considerably durable response in patients with refractory or relapsed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Most of these CARs were generated by lentivirus. With the exception of Yescarta and Tecartus, few patients with relapsed-/refractory- lymphoma have been treated clinically with a CARs using retroviral vector (RV). Here, we reported a relapsed/refractory grade 2 follicular lymphoma patient with multiple chemotherapy failures, and was treated with a novel CD19 CAR-T cell manufactured from a RV. After tumor burden was reduced with Obinutuzumab and Duvelisib, the patient was infused novel CD19 CAR-T cells at a dose of 3 × 106 cells/ kg. Then he experienced a rapid response and achieved almost complete remission by day 26. Only grade 2 CRS, bilateral submaxillary lymph node enlargement and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred without neurotoxicity, and the patient's condition improved after a series of symptomatic treatments. In addition, CAR copy number peaked at 532,350 copies/µg on day 15 and continued to expand for 5 months. This may be the first case report of RV preparation of novel CD19 CAR-T cells for direct treatment of recurrent follicular lymphoma. We will observe its long-term efficacy and conduct trials in more patients in the future.

Complete response induced by nivolumab monotherapy in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report.

No standard treatment has been established for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC). We present the case of a patient with recurrent G-NEC who achieved a complete response (CR) with nivolumab. A woman in her 70 s, with no significant medical or family history of illness, underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which revealed a Borrmann type 2 tumor in the gastric antrum. Malignant tumor cells were not detected in the endoscopic biopsy samples; however, a malignant gastric tumor was strongly suspected. Therefore, surgical resection was performed, and the tumor was pathologically diagnosed as a G-NEC with liver metastases. Adjuvant etoposide plus carboplatin was administered for four cycles, but recurrence in the liver was observed 5 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel and irinotecan were introduced as second and third-line treatments. After these treatments, the mesenteric lymph node metastases expanded. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was low (five mutations/megabase), and microsatellite instability remained stable. However, programmed death-ligand 1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) was ≥ 5 in the resected sample. Therefore, nivolumab monotherapy was introduced as a fourth-line treatment. The mesenteric lymph node metastases exhibited swelling 3 weeks after the initiation of nivolumab; however, they rapidly shrank, and CR was later achieved. Treatment with nivolumab is currently ongoing for 12 months. This is the first report of nivolumab monotherapy in a patient with G-NEC who showed pseudo-progression. Even in TMB-low and microsatellite stable cases, nivolumab may be a viable option for patients with G-NEC.

Repeating late-phase pseudo-progression in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with long-term nivolumab monotherapy; a case report.

Background: Immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nearly a decade has passed since nivolumab was approved by the FDA for NSCLC patients. However, long-term outcomes and clinical features remain unclear for individual cases. Pseudo-progression is a well-known paradoxical radiological response pattern under ICI treatment which occurs when tumor index lesions regress after apparent initial progression. We herein report a unique case of NSCLC with repeating pseudo-progression in late phase treated with nivolumab monotherapy for 8.5 years. Case presentation: A 56-year-old male diagnosed with Non-sq NSCLC clinical stage IVA, at the left upper lobe primary lesion. The primary lesion was PD-L1 negative with no oncogenic driver mutations. He had multiple pulmonary metastases and a left adrenal gland metastasis, and subsequently, received nivolumab as third-line therapy. After initiation of nivolumab, the lung lesion and adrenal metastasis shrank rapidly; however, the patient experienced three late-phase pseudo-progressions in the mediastinal lymph node (LN). This patient is still receiving nivolumab with no symptoms and PS 0. Acquired resistance should be judged carefully in patients with LN-only oligo-progression to avoid unnecessary local therapies and the misjudgment of treatment.

[Utility of 11C-methionine PET/CT in neuro-oncology]. / Utilidad de 11C-metionina PET/CT en neurooncología.

Positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-methionine (11C-methionine PET/CT) is a new technique used to evaluate primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. We describe our experience regarding the first 4 patients with glial tumors and 11C-methionine PET/CT. This is a descriptive, observational and prospective study of 4 patients between 38-50 years of age, with different gliomas (WHO classification). MRI and 11C-methionine PET/CT were performed in all cases. Case 1, gliomatosis cerebri grade II post-radiotherapy. Case 2, oligodendroglioma grade II diagnosed and treated with radiotherapy in 1993. Case 3, glioblastoma grade IV post-radiotherapy + temozolomide. Case 4, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma grade III post-radiotherapy + temozolomide. The pattern of 11C-methionine uptake compared with MRI showed tumor progression in cases 1, 3 and 4, and in case 2 showed uptake although the final diagnosis was pseudoprogression. Unlike 18fluordeoxiglucose PET/TC, 11C-methionine uptake in normal brain tissue and pseudoprogression is low, and gliomas are displayed as metabolically active areas. The 11C-methionine PET/CT provided valuable information on the tumoral behavior and extension, although in one case presented did not differentiate tumor progression from pseudoprogression. 11C-methionine PET/CT could be a useful tool in the study and follow-up to patients with gliomas.

The value of arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion MRI in the assessment of post-treatment progression in adult glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The distinction between viable tumor and therapy-induced changes is crucial for the clinical management of patients with gliomas. This study aims to quantitatively assess the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) biomarkers, including relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF), for the discrimination of progressive disease (PD) and treatment-related effects. Methods: Eight articles were included in the synthesis after searching the literature systematically. Data have been extracted and a meta-analysis using the random-effect model was subsequently carried out. Diagnostic accuracy assessment was also performed. Results: This study revealed that there is a significant difference in perfusion measurements between groups with PD and therapy-induced changes. The rCBF yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.25 [95% CI 0.75, 1.75] (p < .00001). The maximum perfusion indices (rCBFmax and CBFmax) both showed equivalent discriminatory ability, with SMD of 1.35 [95% CI 0.78, 1.91] (p < .00001) and 1.56 [95% CI 0.79, 2.33] (p < .0001), respectively. Similarly, accuracy estimates were comparable among ASL-derived metrices. Pooled sensitivities [95% CI] were 0.85 [0.67, 0.94], 0.88 [0.71, 0.96], and 0.93 [0.73, 0.98], and pooled specificities [95% CI] were 0.83 [0.71, 0.91], 0.83 [0.67, 0.92], 0.84 [0.67, 0.93], for rCBF, rCBFmax and CBFmax, respectively. Corresponding HSROC area under curve (AUC) [95% CI] were 0.90 [0.87, 0.92], 0.92 [0.89, 0.94], and 0.93 [0.90, 0.95]. Conclusion: These results suggest that ASL quantitative biomarkers, particularly rCBFmax and CBFmax, have the potential to discriminate between glioma progression and therapy-induced changes.

Radionecrosis mimicking pseudo­progression in a patient with lung cancer and brain metastasis following the combination of anti­PD­1 therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery: A case report.

Brain metastases (BMs) usually develop in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In addition to systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery, anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy is another promising clinical anticancer treatment modality. However, the optimal timing and drug-drug interactions of anti-PD-L1 therapy with other combined treatments remain to be elucidated. Treatment with anti-PD-L1 therapy is associated with an increased risk of radionecrosis (RN) regardless of tumor histology. The present study described a case of RN in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and with BM who received anti-PD-L1 therapy. Before anti-PD-L1 treatment, the patient received whole brain radiotherapy. During durvalumab treatment, the intracranial metastases regressed. The progression of intracranial lesions 9 months later prompted a second-line of therapy with PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Despite stereotactic irradiation, the lesions progressed further, leading to surgical resection. On examination, RN was detected, but there was no evidence of metastatic lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to present the longitudinal change in magnetic resonance imaging in RN following STR and anti-PD-L1 combined therapy. The atypical image of RN is conditionally important for making an accurate preoperative diagnosis.

Glioblastoma pseudoprogression and true progression reveal spatially variable transcriptional differences.

Post-resection radiologic monitoring to identify areas of new or progressive enhancement concerning for cancer recurrence is critical during patients with glioblastoma follow-up. However, treatment-related pseudoprogression presents with similar imaging features but requires different clinical management. While pathologic diagnosis is the gold standard to differentiate true progression and pseudoprogression, the lack of objective clinical standards and admixed histologic presentation creates the needs to (1) validate the accuracy of current approaches and (2) characterize differences between these entities to objectively differentiate true disease. We demonstrated using an online RNAseq repository of recurrent glioblastoma samples that cancer-immune cell activity levels correlate with heterogenous clinical outcomes in patients. Furthermore, nCounter RNA expression analysis of 48 clinical samples taken from second neurosurgical resection supports that pseudoprogression gene expression pathways are dominated with immune activation, whereas progression is predominated with cell cycle activity. Automated image processing and spatial expression analysis however highlight a failure to apply these broad expressional differences in a subset of cases with clinically challenging admixed histology. Encouragingly, applying unsupervised clustering approaches over our segmented histologic images provides novel understanding of morphologically derived differences between progression and pseudoprogression. Spatially derived data further highlighted polarization of myeloid populations that may underscore the tumorgenicity of novel lesions. These findings not only help provide further clarity of potential targets for pathologists to better assist stratification of progression and pseudoprogression, but also highlight the evolution of tumor-immune microenvironment changes which promote tumor recurrence.

Dosimetric and clinical analysis of pseudo-progression versus recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: The main challenge in follow-up duration of patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy is to distinguish between pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence. The objective of this study is to retrospectively analyze the predictive factors. METHODS: The study included 123 patients with enlarged brain metastases after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in our center from March 2009 to October 2019, and the baseline clinical features, radiotherapy planning parameters, and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before and after radiation therapy were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to compare the differences between groups. Independent risk factors with P < 0.05 and associated with recurrence were used to establish a nomogram prediction model and validated by Bootstrap repeated sampling, which was validated in an internal cohort (n = 23) from October 2019 to December 2021. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 68.4 months (range, 8.9-146.2 months). A total of 76 (61.8%) patients were evaluated as pseudo-progression, 47 patients (38.2%) were evaluated as tumor recurrence. The median time to pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence were 18.3 months (quartile range, 9.4-27.8 months) and 12.9 months (quartile range, 8.7-19.6 months) respectively. Variables associated with tumor recurrence included: gross tumor volume ≥ 6 cc, biological effective dose < 60 Gy, target coverage < 96% and no targeted therapy. The area under curve values were 0.730 and 0.967 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Thirty-one patients received salvage therapy in the tumor recurrence group. The survival time in pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence groups were 66.3 months (95% CI 56.8-75.9 months) and 39.6 months (95% CI 29.2-50.0 months, respectively; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and dosimetry features of hypo-fractionated radiation therapy based on enhanced brain magnetic resonance can help distinguish pseudo-progression from tumor recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases. Gross tumor volume, biological effective dose, target coverage, and having received targeted therapy or not were factors associated with the occurrence of tumor recurrence, and the individual risk could be estimated by the nomogram effectively.

Life-threatening "hyper-progression" on immunotherapy revealed as pseudo-progression in DNA mismatch repair deficiency: a case report.

Background: Distinguishing pseudo-progression from true progression on immunotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Clinical tools to aid in this task are currently lacking. DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status is a known predictive marker for anti-programmed death (PD)-1 therapy, but its role in helping to address this situation is not well-defined. Case Description: We report the first case, to our knowledge, of life-threatening hyper-progression which was later revealed to be pseudo-progression in a patient with a deficient MMR (dMMR) tumor. We describe a 62-year-old man with advanced dMMR gastric cancer who was being treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. After three doses of pembrolizumab he exhibited signs and symptoms that met all applicable definitions of hyper-progression in the setting of acute life-threatening gastrointestinal hemorrhage, extensive radiographic progression of metastases, and increasing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Comfort measures were considered given the appearance of hyper-progression. But partly given the patient's request, aggressive support was provided, including blood products, vasopressors, and splenic artery embolization. His condition improved, and subsequent scans revealed regression of his metastases and decreased CEA, confirming pseudo-progression. Pembrolizumab was restarted. The patient remains on pembrolizumab with minimal tumor burden more than one year later. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that life-threatening hyper-progression can represent pseudo-progression and suggests that MMR status could be important to consider in determining the aggressiveness of clinical management during apparent hyper-progression.

Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI may contribute in prediction of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome in brain metastases.

Background: Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), predicting treatment response is not possible at an early stage using structural imaging alone. Hence, the current study aims at investigating whether dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI estimated prior to SRS can provide predictive biomarkers in response to SRS treatment and characterize vascular characteristics of pseudo-progression. Methods: In this retrospective study, perfusion-weighted DSC-MRI image data acquired with a temporal resolution of 1.45 seconds were collected from 41 patients suffering from brain metastases. Outcome was defined based on lesion volume changes in time (determined on structural images) or death. Motion correction and manual lesion delineation were performed prior to semi-automated, voxel-wise perfusion analysis. Statistical testing was performed using linear regression and a significance threshold at P = .05. Age, sex, primary cancers (pulmonary cancer and melanoma), lesion volume, and dichotomized survival time were added as covariates in the linear regression models (ANOVA). Results: Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were found to be significantly lower prior to SRS treatment in patients with increasing lesion volume or early death post-SRS (P ≤ .01). Conclusion: Unfavorable treatment outcome may be linked to low perfusion prior to SRS. Pseudo-progression may be preceded by a transient rCBF increase post-SRS. However, results should be verified in different or larger patient material.

Successful Targeting of CTLA-4 in a Melanoma Clinical Case: A Long-Term "One Stop Therapeutic Shop".

The anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody ipilimumab was the first in-class immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approved for the treatment of melanoma patients. Initially approved for metastatic cutaneous melanoma, treatment with ipilimumab subsequently demonstrated to significantly improve recurrence free survival (RFS) in fully resected, high-risk, stage III melanoma patients. Therapeutic use of ipilimumab has also allowed the initial identification and characterization of unconventional clinical and radiological patterns of response (ie, tumor flare, pseudo-progression) that may occur during ICI therapy, unlike chemotherapy or targeted therapy. As a result, the standard Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria conventionally utilized to assess responses to chemo/targeted therapy have been initially replaced by the immune-related (ir) Response Criteria (irRC) and then by the irRECIST, that encompass all patterns of response typical of ICI therapy, being key for the optimal comprehensive management of treated patients. Here, we report a paradigmatic clinical case of a long-term survival in a stage III melanoma patient, experiencing tumor flares during adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab, and an untreated disease relapse several years after ending therapy.