Recurrent venous thromboembolism and vaginal estradiol in women with prior venous thromboembolism: A nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Whether vaginal estradiol use is associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women with prior VTE is unknown. We sought to evaluate the association between vaginal estradiol use and recurrent VTE in women with prior VTE. METHODS: We performed a nationwide nested case-control study among 44 024 women aged ≥45 years who developed a first VTE without a history of vaginal estrogen use prior to VTE diagnosis. Cases with recurrent VTE were matched 1:2 on birth year with controls using incidence density sampling. Exposure to vaginal estradiol tablets was categorized into current use (0-2 months before index), prior use (2-24 months before index) and past use (more than 24 months prior to index). RESULTS: We identified 5066 cases and 10 127 age-matched controls. In fully adjusted analysis vaginal estrogen was not associated with recurrent VTE with a hazard ratio of 0.75, p = .07 for current use, 0.83, p = .13 for prior use, and 1.24, p = .06 for past use. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal estradiol tablets in women with prior VTE was not associated with an increased rate of recurrent VTE. Our study indicates that vaginal estradiol therapy is unlikely to increase risk of recurrent VTE in women with prior VTE.

Comparison of rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a Swedish national population-based register study.

BACKGROUND: Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) with anticoagulation prevents recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE), but increases bleeding risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare incidence of rVTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality for rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CAT. METHODS: We developed a cohort study using Swedish national registers 2013-2019. Patients with CAT (venous thromboembolism within 6 months of cancer diagnosis) were included. Those with other indications or with high bleeding risk cancers were excluded (according to guidelines). Follow-up was from index-CAT until outcome, death, emigration, or end of study. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) and propensity score overlap-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban versus LMWH were estimated. RESULTS: We included 283 patients on rivaroxaban and 5181 on LMWH. The IR for rVTE was 68.7 (95% CI 40.0-109.9) for rivaroxaban, compared with 91.6 (95% CI 81.9-102.0) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-1.35). The IR for major bleeding was 23.5 (95% CI 8.6-51.1) for rivaroxaban versus 49.2 (95% CI 42.3-56.9) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.26-1.49). The IR for all-cause mortality was 146.8 (95% CI 103.9-201.5) for rivaroxaban and 565.6 (95% CI 541.8-590.2) for LMWH with adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban performed similarly to LMWH for patients with CAT for rVTE and major bleeding. An all-cause mortality benefit was observed for rivaroxaban which potentially may be attributed to residual confounding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05150938 (Registered 9 December 2021).

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GICA) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Data from randomized clinical trials in cancer-associated VTE suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) conferred similar or superior efficacy but a heterogeneous safety profile in patients with GICA. We compared the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in patients with GICA and VTE at MD Anderson Cancer Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients with GICA and VTE receiving treatment with DOACs for a minimum of 6 months. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients experiencing major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes were time to bleeding and recurrent VTE. RESULTS: A cohort of 433 patients with GICA who were prescribed apixaban (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 133) were included. MB occurred in 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-5.9), CRNMB in 5.3% (95% CI 3.4-7.9), and recurrent VTE in 7.4% (95% CI 5.1-10.3). The cumulative incidence rates of CRNMB and recurrent VTE were not significantly different when comparing apixaban to rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Apixaban and rivaroxaban had a similar risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding and could be considered as anticoagulant options in selected patients with GICA and VTE.

Risk for recurrence of symptomatic upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis in patients without cancer: Analysis of three RIETE cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with a pacemaker-related upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) has not been consistently studied. METHODS: We used the RIETE registry data to compare the outcomes during anticoagulation and after its discontinuation in noncancer patients with symptomatic UEDVT associated with a pacemaker, other catheters, or no catheter. The major outcome was the composite of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or recurrent DVT. RESULTS: As of February 2022, 2578 patients with UEDVT were included: 156 had a pacemaker-related UEDVT, 557 had other catheters, and 1865 had no catheter. During anticoagulation, 61 patients (2.3%) developed recurrent VTE, 38 had major bleeding (1.4%), and 90 died (3.4%). After its discontinuation, 52 patients (4.4%) had recurrent acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and six had major bleeding (0.5%). On multivariable analysis, there were no differences among subgroups in the rates of VTE recurrences or major bleeding during anticoagulation. After its discontinuation, patients with a pacemaker-related UEDVT had a higher risk for VTE recurrences than those with no catheter (adjusted OR: 4.59; 95% CI: 1.98-10.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pacemaker-related UEDVT are at increased risk for VTE recurrences after discontinuing anticoagulation. If our findings are validated in adequately designed trials, this may justify changes in the current recommendations on the duration of anticoagulation.

The value of distinguishing patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism presenting to two tertiary hospitals in Australia: an observational study.

Isolated-subsegmental-pulmonary-embolism (SSPE) is increasingly diagnosed with the use of computed-tomography-pulmonary-angiogram (CTPA). There remains clinical equipoise for management of SSPE with previous studies not accounting for frailty while determining clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes among patients with isolated SSPE were compared with those with a more proximal PE after accounting for frailty and other risk-factors. This study included all patients with a positive CTPA for pulmonary embolism (PE) admitted between 2017 and 2021 to two Australian-tertiary-hospitals. Frailty was determined by use of the hospital-frailty-risk-score (HFRS). Competing-risk-analysis and Cox-proportional hazard models determined the cumulative-risk of VTE and mortality within 3 months and 1 year of index PE event after adjustment for frailty and other variables. Of 334 patients with positive CTPA for PE, 111 (33.2%) had isolated-SSPE. The mean (SD) age was 64.3 (17.7) years, 50.9% were males and 9.6% were frail. The risk of recurrent VTE within 3-months (0.9% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.458) and within 1-year of follow-up (2.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.126) did not differ significantly between patients with isolated SSPE and those with more proximal PE. After adjusted analyses, the cumulative-incidence of recurrent VTE was not different among patients with isolated SSPE within 1 year of index event [subdistribution-hazard-ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.60]. Similarly, mortality within 1 year of index event was also not different between the two groups (aHR 1.72, 95% CI 0.92-3.23). The prevalence of SSPE was 33.2% and even after adjustment for frailty these patients had no different clinical outcomes than those with proximal PE.

Risks, diagnosis, and management of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT): a narrative review.

This paper aims to provide a narrative review of the risks, diagnosis, and management of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There is an established association between cancer and VTE, with cancer being a major risk factor for VTE. A history of VTE, short duration of oral anticoagulation, and a proximal DVT are all associated with increased risk for recurrent VTE. Studies have shown that certain cancers (e.g., metastatic genitourinary, lung, and colorectal cancers) are associated with recurrent VTE. Published literature shows that cancer is prothrombotic, and various mechanisms have been postulated as pathways for increased thrombogenesis and hence recurrent VTE in cancer. The symptoms, signs, laboratory information, and imaging results for the diagnosis of recurrent VTE are similar to those of an initial VTE. Management of recurrent VTE involves using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are less commonly used.

Mortality, Recurrent Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding in Cancer-Associated and Non-Cancer Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study compares the mortality, incidence of recurrent VTE, and incidence of major bleeding between non-cancer and cancer-associated PE patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).Methods and Results:This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study involving 130 consecutive patients (87 with active cancer; 43 without cancer) who received DOAC treatment for PE between January 2016 and December 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly higher mortality in cancer-associated PE patients than in non-cancer patients (35/87 [40%] vs. 1/43 [2%], P<0.001, log-rank test, HR 18.6 [95% CI: 2.5-136.0]). In contrast, the cumulative incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were comparable between the 2 groups. Among the cancer-associated PE patients, the incidence for the composite outcome of recurrent VTE or major bleeding was significantly higher in patients undergoing chemotherapy than in those not undergoing chemotherapy (9/37 [24%] vs. 2/50 [4%], P=0.004, log-rank test, HR 6.9 [95% CI: 1.5-32.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer-associated PE patients treated with DOACs showed higher mortality compared with non-cancer patients, presumably because of the presence of cancer, the risk of recurrent VTE or major bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups. Thus, DOAC is an important treatment option for cancer-associated PE, although underlying cancer-related risks (e.g., chemotherapy) remain.

High risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms after termination of anticoagulation.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major burden in patients with BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). In addition to cytoreductive treatment anticoagulation is mandatory, but optimal duration of anticoagulation is a matter of debate. In our single center study, we retrospectively included 526 MPN patients. In total, 78 of 526 MPN patients (14.8%) had 99 MPN-associated VTE. Median age at first VTE was 52.5 years (range 23-81). During a study period of 3497 years, a VTE event rate of 1.7% per patient/year was detected. 38.4% (38/99) of all VTEs appeared before or at MPN diagnosis and 55.6% (55/99) occurred at "uncommon" sites like splanchnic or cerebral veins. MPN patients with VTEs were significantly more female (p = 0.028), JAK2 positive (p = 0.018), or had a polycythemia vera (p = 0.009). MPN patients without VTEs were more often CALR positive (p = 0.023). Total study period after first VTE was 336 years with 20 VTE recurrences accounting for a recurrence rate of 6% per patient/year. In 36 of 71 MPN patients with anticoagulation therapy after first VTE event (50.7%), prophylactic anticoagulation was terminated after a median time of 6 months (range 1-61); 13 of those 36 patients (36.1%) had a VTE recurrence after a median of 13 months (range 4-168). In contrast, only three of 35 (8.6%) patients with ongoing anticoagulation had a VTE recurrence (p = 0.0127). Thus, termination of prophylactic anticoagulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE recurrence. Our data suggest that in MPN patients with VTE, a prolonged duration of anticoagulation may be beneficial.

COSIMO - patients with active cancer changing to rivaroxaban for the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Around 20% of venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases occur in patients with cancer. Current guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as the preferred anticoagulant for VTE treatment. However, some guidelines state that vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are acceptable alternatives for long-term therapy in some patients if LMWHs are not available. LMWHs and VKAs have a number of drawbacks that can increase the burden on patients. DOACs, such as rivaroxaban, can ameliorate some burdens and may offer an opportunity to increase patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Cancer-associated thrOmboSIs - patient-reported outcoMes with rivarOxaban (COSIMO) study is designed to provide real-world information on treatment satisfaction in patients with active cancer who switch from LMWH or VKA to rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE or to prevent recurrent VTE. METHODS: COSIMO is a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm cohort study that aims to recruit 500 patients in Europe, Canada and Australia. Adults with active cancer who are switching to rivaroxaban having received LMWH/VKA for the treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent VTE for at least the previous 4 weeks are eligible. Patients will be followed for 6 months. The primary outcome is treatment satisfaction assessed as change in the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) Burdens score at week 4 after enrolment compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes include treatment preferences, measured using a discrete choice experiment, change in ACTS Burdens score at months 3 and 6, and change in HRQoL (assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue questionnaire). COSIMO will collect data on patients' medical history, patterns of anticoagulant use and incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Study recruitment started in autumn 2016. CONCLUSIONS: COSIMO will provide information on outcomes associated with switching from LMWH or VKA therapy to rivaroxaban for the treatment or secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in a real-life setting. The key goal is to assess whether there is a change in patient-reported treatment satisfaction. In addition, COSIMO will facilitate the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in preventing recurrent VTE in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02742623. Registered 19 April 2016.

Increased benefit of betrixaban among patients with a history of venous thromboembolism: a post-hoc analysis of the APEX trial.

Hospitalized acute medically ill patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk for recurrent VTE. We characterized the efficacy and safety of betrixaban for prevention of recurrent VTE in these high risk patients. The APEX trial randomized 7513 acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at risk for developing VTE to receive either betrixaban for 35-42 days or enoxaparin for 10 ± 4 days to prevent VTE. This exploratory post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of betrixaban versus enoxaparin among subjects with and without prior VTE. Time-to-multiple symptomatic VTE events was also calculated. Approximately 8% of subjects in both arms had prior VTE, which was associated with a fourfold increase in adjusted risk of VTE [MV OR 4.03, 95% CI 3.06-5.30, p < 0.001]. Betrixaban reduced VTE compared with enoxaparin among subjects with prior VTE [32 (10.4%) vs. 55 (18.9%), RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86, p = 0.006, ARR 8.5%, NNT 12] and without prior VTE [133 (3.9%) vs. 168 (4.9%), RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.042, ARR 1.0%, NNT 100] (interaction p > 0.05). Additionally, four subjects in the enoxaparin arm and one subject in the betrixaban arm experienced a recurrent VTE. Compared with enoxaparin, betrixaban use was associated with reduction of recurrent VTE events through the active treatment period [36 vs. 57, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.045] and through the end of study [38 vs. 71, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81, p = 0.004]. Prior VTE is associated with a fourfold increase in the risk of VTE among hospitalized medically ill patients. Only 12 such patients would need to be treated with betrixaban versus enoxaparin to prevent an additional VTE endpoint. Betrixaban reduced not only the first but also all recurrent VTE events in a time-to-any-event analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , Unique identifier: NCT01583218.

Thrombophilia and risk of VTE recurrence according to the age at the time of first VTE manifestation.

BACKGROUND: Whether screening for thrombophilia is useful for patients after a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a controversial issue. However, the impact of thrombophilia on the risk of recurrence may vary depending on the patient's age at the time of the first VTE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1221 VTE patients (42 % males) registered in the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) registry, 261 experienced VTE recurrence during a 5-year follow-up after the discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. RESULTS: Thrombophilia was more common among patients with VTE recurrence than those without (58.6 % vs. 50.3 %; p = 0.017). Stratifying patients by the age at the time of their initial VTE, Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for age, sex and the presence or absence of established risk factors revealed a heterozygous prothrombin (PT) G20210A mutation (hazard ratio (HR) 2.65; 95 %-confidence interval (CI) 1.71 - 4.12; p < 0.001), homozygosity/double heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden and/or PT mutation (HR 2.35; 95 %-CI 1.09 - 5.07, p = 0.030), and an antithrombin deficiency (HR 2.12; 95 %-CI 1.12 - 4.10; p = 0.021) to predict recurrent VTE in patients aged 40 years or older, whereas lupus anticoagulants (HR 3.05; 95%-CI 1.40 - 6.66; p = 0.005) increased the risk of recurrence in younger patients. Subgroup analyses revealed an increased risk of recurrence for a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation only in young females without hormonal treatment whereas the predictive value of a heterozygous PT mutation was restricted to males over the age of 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support a preference of younger patients for thrombophilia testing after a first venous thromboembolic event.

The prediction role of D-dimer in recurrence of venous thromboembolism 1-year after anticoagulation discontinuing following idiopathic deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: After discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), the recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is greatest in the 1(st) year and gradually diminishes. D-dimer assay was proposed to be effective in selecting patients with idiopathic DVT. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of VTE recurrence after discontinuing OAT according to the results of D-dimer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in patients with a first episode of symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who had received OAT for at least 3 months. Patients were re-evaluated at 1(st), 6(th) and 12(th) months of their follow-up. At the first (T0) and 30-day (T1) visits, venous blood samples were taken for D-dimer test. At each follow-up visit, we examined patients for clinical symptoms or signs of recurrent VTE, bleeding, postthrombotic manifestations, adherence to treatment, and concomitant analgesic or antiinflammatory therapy. The endpoint outcomes were VTE recurrence and complete of this survey follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 68 eligible patients was enrolled. Four patients (two patients need to use long-term oral anticoagulation, and two patients lost their first follow-up) were excluded. At T0, D-dimer and compression ultrasonongraphy (CUS) was normal in 28 patients (44%). Moreover, 36 patients had abnormal D-dimer but normal CUS. A follow-up of 12 months was available in 44 patients. During the follow-up, three recurrent events were recorded. All Recurrent events were ipsilateral DVT. Among these index cases, all had an abnormal D-dimer at either T0 and/or T1. The recurrence rate was higher in males than in females (8.6% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.04) with an abnormal D-dimer at T0 and/or T1 with a multivariate hazard ratio of 2.1 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.2-5.2; P = 0.02). Patients older than 65 years had a higher rate of events than younger and hazard ratio was about 3.8 (95% CI: 2.1-4.2; P = 0.02). Patients with recurrences had higher mean D-dimer at both T0 and T1 when compared with those without recurrences, but the difference was significant only for D-dimer at T1 (P = 0.03). During the follow-up, two patients died (3%). CONCLUSION: Within 12 months follow-up, the risk of recurrence with an abnormal D-dimer, either during or at 1-month after discontinuing OAT, was 4.6% which is much lower to the annual risk of recurrence in most studies with idiopathic and provoked VTE. D-dimer has an acceptable prognostic value in detecting recurrence of idiopathic VTE before discontinuing the anticoagulant therapy.

Duration of anticoagulation of venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, serious condition that requires anticoagulation for at least three months to prevent recurrence and long-term complications. After this initial period, the decision to continue or stop anticoagulation depends on the balance between the risk of recurrent VTE and the risk of bleeding. Established guidelines suggest short-term anticoagulation for VTE caused by transient factors and indefinite anticoagulation for recurrent or cancer-associated VTE. However, for a first unprovoked VTE, decision-making remains challenging. Current predictive scores for recurrence and bleeding are not sufficiently reliable, and the safety and efficacy of reduced-dose anticoagulation remain unclear. In the future, precision and patient-centred medicine may improve treatment decisions in this area.

Real-world Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with or without Preceding Parenteral Anticoagulants: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Objective Edoxaban is an anticoagulant used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and requires pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants. However, pretreatment is not always performed in the clinical setting. In this study, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban treatment in patients with VTE with or without pretreatment. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 364 patients who received edoxaban for VTE treatment between September 2014 and March 2020 and investigated patient demographics, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding as clinical outcomes in patients with or without pretreatment. Furthermore, the factors contributing to pretreatment decisions were assessed. Results Patients without pretreatment (n=208) had more active cancer cases and fewer pulmonary embolism complications than those with pretreatment (n=156). Lower levels of hemoglobin and higher levels of white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer at the diagnosis were found in patients who received pretreatment than in those without pretreatment. No symptomatic VTE recurrence was observed. After propensity score matching, the cumulative incidence of major bleeding was not significantly higher in patients with pretreatment than in those without it (log-rank test, p=0.136). The incidence of deteriorated VTE on imaging did not significantly differ between patients with and without pretreatment, even after propensity matching (log-rank test, p=0.414). Conclusion In a real-world clinical setting, where physicians determined the use of parenteral anticoagulant lead-in according to their experience, patient demographics, and VTE characteristics, no significant differences were found regarding safety and effectiveness in edoxaban-treated VTE patients with or without pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants.

Risk factors for recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

Risks of recurrence and treatment-emergent bleeding are high in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) but factors associated with these risks remain substantially undefined. The aim of this analysis in patients with cancer-associated VTE included in the Caravaggio study was to identify risk factors for recurrent VTE and major bleeding. Variables potentially predictive for recurrent VTE or major bleeding were evaluated in a Cox proportional hazard multivariable analysis with backward variable selection. Recurrent VTE occurred in 78 patients (6.8%) and major bleeding in 45 (3.9%). Independent risk factors for recurrent VTE were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as index event (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.88), ECOG status of 1 or more (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.11-3.43), pancreatic or hepatobiliary cancer site (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.19-4.06), concomitant anti-cancer treatment (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.03-3.81) and creatinine clearance (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20 for every 10 ml/min absolute increase). Independent risk factors for major bleeding were ECOG status of 2 (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.24-4.29), genitourinary cancer site (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.28-5.77), upper gastrointestinal cancer site (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.22-8.23), and non-resected luminal gastrointestinal cancer (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.38-5.56). This analysis of the Caravaggio study in patients with cancer-associated VTE who were on standardized anticoagulant treatment identified five independent predictors for recurrent VTE and four independent predictors of treatment-emergent major bleeding. Considering these risks could help clinicians to optimize the anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer-associated VTE.

Intensify Standardized Anticoagulation for Cancer-associated Pulmonary Embolism: From Single-center Real-world Data.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant contributor to mortality in patients with cancer. Although anticoagulation serves as the cornerstone of treatment for cancer-associated PE, it has not been emphasized in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of suboptimal anticoagulant treatment on the prognosis of cancer-associated PE. METHODS: A cohort of 356 individuals newly diagnosed with acute PE were enrolled. The primary outcome of the study was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major bleeding (consisting of a reduction in the hemoglobin level by at least 20 g/L, transfusion of at least 2 units of blood, or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ or fatal bleeding). FINDINGS: Of the total participants, 156 (43.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. A comparison between the cancer and noncancer groups revealed that patients with cancer were more frequently asymptomatic (41.0% vs 4.5%; P < 0.001), less likely to have right ventricular dysfunction (4.5% vs 14.0%; P = 0.001), received less anticoagulant treatment during hospitalization (85.3% vs 98.5%; P < 0.001), and had a shorter duration of anticoagulation (5.02 [7.40] months vs 14.19 [10.65] months; P < 0.001). In addition, patients with cancer were found to be at a higher risk of recurrent VTE (17.3% vs 4.0%; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (23.7% vs 10.5%; P = 0.001). Multiple Cox regression analysis indicated that discontinuation of anticoagulation at 3 months was a significant risk factor for recurrent VTE in the cancer group (HR, 15.815; 95% CI, 3.047-82.079; P = 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: The brief duration of anticoagulation therapy and elevated likelihood of recurrent VTE serve as cautionary indicators for the need to enhance awareness of standardized anticoagulant treatment for cancer-associated PE. The ultimate goal is to enhance patient prognosis and quality of life.

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction and recurrence after acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

We aimed to assess the relationship between residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO) on planar lung scan after completion of at least 3 months of anticoagulant therapy for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or death due to PE one year after treatment discontinuation. The systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42017081080). The primary outcome measure was to generate a pooled estimate of the rate of recurrent VTE at one year in patient with RPVO diagnosed on planar lung scan after discontinuation of at least 3 months of anticoagulant treatment for an acute PE. Individual data were obtained for 809 patients. RPVO (ie, obstruction >0%) was found in 407 patients (50.3%) after a median of 6.6 months of anticoagulant therapy for a first acute PE. Recurrent VTE or death due to PE occurred in 114 patients (14.1%), for an annual risk of 6.4% (95% confidence interval, 4.7%-8.6%). Out of the 114 recurrent events, 63 occurred within one year after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy corresponding to a risk of 8.1% (6.4%-9.8%) at 1 year. The risk of recurrent VTE at one year was 5.8% (4.4-7.2) in participants with RPVO <5%, vs 11.7% (9.5-13.8) in participants with RPVO ≥5%. RPVO is a significant predictor of the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. However, the risk of recurrent events remains too high in patients without residual perfusion defect for it to be used as a stand-alone test to decide on anticoagulation discontinuation.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Warfarin in Adult Cancer Patients as a Precision Medicine for Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition often seen in patients diagnosed with cancer and is recognized as a predictor of poor outcomes in these patients. The probability of VTE recurring is generally higher in people with cancer than in those without; hence, addressing this issue is essential when making healthcare decisions. Therefore, our systematic review was primarily designed to compare low-weight- molecular heparin (LMWH) to warfarin in reducing recurrent VTE among cancer patients. However, other outcomes were also evaluated, such as mortality and bleeding events observed more in cancer patients. The selection of relevant articles was carried out using a database search and a manual search, which involved reviewing reference lists of articles eligible for inclusion in the current review. The methodological quality of each included study was then assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4.1). Additionally, pooled results were examined using the Review Manager software and presented as forest plots. Our search of electronic databases elicited a total of 2163 articles, of which only six were deemed eligible for inclusion and analysis. Data pooled from the six studies demonstrated the effectiveness of LMWH in minimizing the reoccurrence of VTE over warfarin [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47 - 0.95; p = 0.03]. However, LMWH had a similar effect statistically as warfarin on the major bleeding events (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.62 - 1.77; p = 0.85), minor bleeding events (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.54 - 1.20; p = 0.28), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.88 - 1.13; p = 0.99). While LMWH demonstrated its effectiveness in minimizing the incidence of VTE recurrence over warfarin in cancer patients, it had no statistical difference in terms of mortality or bleeding events when compared to warfarin. Based on our findings, we recommend that LMWH continues to be used as a first-line treatment regimen to mitigate recurrent VTE in cancer patients.