The Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Reducer in Patients with Refractory Angina: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Refractory angina is a frequently encountered phenomenon in patients with coronary artery disease, often presenting therapeutic challenges to the clinical cardiologist. Novel treatment methods have been explored in this direction, with the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) being among the most extensively-investigated. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature for studies assessing the efficacy of CSR in patients with refractory angina. The primary endpoints of interest were procedural success and the improvement in angina according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) by at least one class. Secondary endpoints were the rate of periprocedural adverse events, the improvement by at least 2 CCS classes, and the mean change in CCS class. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions (procedural success, improvement by ≥ 1 or ≥ 2 classes, periprocedural adverse events) or means (mean CCS class change) were performed. I 2 was chosen as the metric for between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by the inspection of funnel plots and Egger's regression test. We examined the risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: From a total of 515 studies identified from the original search, 12 studies were finally included for data extraction. Based on their meta-analysis, we observed a high CSR procedural success (98%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 96 to 99%) with a low rate of periprocedural complications (6%, 95% CI 5 to 7%), while most patients exhibited an improvement by at least 1 CCS class (75%, 95% CI 66 to 83%) after the intervention. A significant proportion of patients demonstrated an improvement by at least 2 CCS classes (39%, 95% CI 34 to 45%), with a mean change of -1.24 CCS class (95% CI -1.40 to -1.08). Conclusions: CSR is associated with high implantation success rates and significant improvements in angina symptoms for patients with refractory angina.

Mobilization of Endogenous CD34+/CD133+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells by Enhanced External Counter Pulsation for Treatment of Refractory Angina.

Adult stem cell therapy via intramyocardial injection of autologous CD34+ stem cells has been shown to improve exercise capacity and reduce angina frequency and mortality in patients with refractory angina (RA). However, the cost of such therapy is a limitation to its adoption in clinical practice. Our goal was to determine whether the less costly, less invasive, and widely accessible, FDA-approved alternative treatment for RA patients, known as enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP), mobilizes endogenous CD34+ stem cells and whether such mobilization is associated with the clinical benefits seen with intramyocardial injection. We monitored changes in circulating levels of CD34+/CD133+ and CD34+/KDR+ cells in RA patients undergoing EECP therapy and in a comparator cohort of RA patients undergoing an exercise regimen known as cardiac rehabilitation. Changes in exercise capacity in both cohorts were monitored by measuring treadmill times (TT), double product (DP) scores, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina scores between pre- and post-treatment treadmill stress tests. Circulating levels of CD34+/CD133+ cells increased in patients undergoing EECP and were significant (ß = -2.38, p = 0.012) predictors of improved exercise capacity in these patients. CD34+/CD133+ cells isolated from RA patients could differentiate into endothelial cells, and their numbers increased during EECP therapy. Our results support the hypothesis that mobilized CD34+/CD133+ cells repair vascular damage and increase collateral circulation in RA patients. They further support clinical interventions that can mobilize adult CD34+ stem cells as therapy for patients with RA and other vascular diseases.

The Impact of Coronary Sinus Reducer on Arrhythmic Properties in Patients with Refractory Angina.

Background: Treatment with a coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is a new therapeutic option for refractory angina patients. Preclinical studies have shown antiarrhythmic properties of coronary sinus narrowing. The possible antiarrhythmic effect of CSR implantation is unknown. This study aimed to determine the possible antiarrhythmic effects of CSR implantation as assessed by high-resolution electrocardiogram (hrECG) parameters. Methods: 24 patients from the Crossroad study randomized to either CSR treatment (n = 12) or a sham procedure (n = 12) had hrECG recorded at baseline and after 6 months. T-peak and T-end interval (TpTe) defined as the time difference between the peak amplitude of the T wave and the global end of the T wave, spatial angle between QRS complex and T axis defined as the angle between the ventricular depolarization and repolarization vectors using maximal (QRSTP) and mean (QRSTM) vector amplitudes and spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) calculated as integral of ECG voltages over the entire QRST complex were analyzed. Additionally, we analyzed parameters of QT and heart rate variability using time and frequency domain. Results: At baseline, all analyzed parameters were comparable between both groups and heart rate remained constant. The intragroup analysis did not show any significant change in TpTe, QRSTP, QRSTM, SVG, QT, and heart rate variability at follow-up. Furthermore, intergroup comparison between CSR implantation and sham procedure also did not show any significant difference in the change of analyzed parameters. Conclusions: Compared to the sham procedure, CSR implantation did not demonstrate a significant impact on the arrhythmogenic substrate assessed with hrECG. Clinical Trial Registration: Unique Identifier: NCT04121845, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04121845.

Feasibility of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris and a Cardiac Implanted Electronic Device.

OBJECTIVES: Five to 10% of patients with stable coronary artery disease have refractory angina pectoris (RAP). These patients are restricted in performing daily activities due to angina pectoris. Spinal cord stimulation is a last resort treatment option. A number of this patient population also has an indication for a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) (pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator). Manufacturers of spinal cord stimulators have stated a warning that interference can occur between the spinal cord stimulator and the CIED. Consequently, only a limited number of patients with RAP and a CIED have received a spinal cord stimulator. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to determine whether spinal cord stimulation can be safely used in patients with RAP and a CIED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with RAP referred to our center were screened and included if 1) the patient received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment for RAP and if 2) the patient received a CIED either prior to or after spinal cord stimulator implantation. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treadmill test was used as a screening tool to determine whether the patient was eligible for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator. Interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was checked 1) after TENS treadmill test, 2) during implantation of spinal cord stimulator or CIED, 3) during mode switches of the SCS, and 4) during regular out patient follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 22 patients had both a spinal cord stimulator and a CIED with an average follow-up duration of 44.5 months. No interference between the spinal cord stimulator and CIED was found. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation can be safely applied in patients with a CIED provided that the CIED is checked for interference during implantation, if mode switches of the SCS occurred and once yearly after implantation according to routine follow-up.

Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Shockwave Therapy in Severe Coronary Artery Disease Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Cardiac shockwave therapy (CSWT) is a noninvasive treatment for patients with refractory angina or myocardial ischemia. This study aims to evaluate the potential beneficial effect and safety of CSWT in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).This was a single-arm prospective cohort study. A total of 30 patients with severe CAD who were not suitable for coronary revascularization and who had undergone CABG were enrolled. All patients received CSWT for nine sessions. Evaluation was performed before and after CSWT, including the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) score, nitroglycerin dosage, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and safety parameters. All patients were followed up at both 1 month and 9 months after CSWT.After treatment, CSWT significantly improved CCS classification (P < 0.05), NYHA classification (P < 0.05), nitroglycerin dosage (P < 0.001), and 6MWT (P < 0.05) at 1 month and 9 months after CSWT. SAQ score (P < 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; P = 0.037) by echocardiography significantly improved at 1 month after CSWT. Significant decreases in summed stress score (SSS), summed difference score (SDS), ischemic area stress, and ischemic area difference by MPI were observed at 1 month and 9 months after CSWT (P < 0.01). There were no changes in safety parameters before and after CSWT.CSWT may have a beneficial effect on improving myocardial perfusion, clinical symptoms, exertional capacity, and quality of life and is a safe alternative treatment for patients with severe CAD who have undergone CABG.

Intramyocardial adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor-D∆N∆C gene therapy does not induce ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: The phase I KAT301 trial investigated the use of intramyocardial adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor-DΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D) gene therapy (GT) to alleviate symptoms in refractory angina (RA) patients. In KAT301, 30 patients with RA were randomized to AdVEGF-D or the control group in 4:1 ratio. The treatment was found to be feasible, increasing myocardial perfusion and reducing angina symptoms at 1-year follow-up. However, there is some evidence suggesting that the intramyocardial delivery route and overexpression of (vascular endothelial growth) VEGFs might induce ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, we investigated whether intramyocardial AdVEGF-D GT increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated for RA. METHODS: We analyzed non-invasive risk predictors of ventricular arrhythmias from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) as well as heart rate variability (HRV) and the incidence of arrhythmias from 24 h ambulatory ECG at baseline and 3 and 12 months after the GT. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of new-onset arrhythmias and pacemaker implantations during 8.2 years (range 6.3-10.4 years) of follow-up. RESULTS: We found no significant increase in arrhythmias, including supraventricular and ventricular ectopic beats, atrial fibrillation, non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, and life-threatening tachycardias, nor changes in the non-invasive risk predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in the AdVEGF-D treated patients. Instead, we found a significant improvement in the very low and high-frequency bands of HRV suggestive of improved cardiac autonomic regulation after GT. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results suggest that AdVEGF-D GT does not predispose to arrhythmias and might improve HRV metrics.

Efficacy of coronary sinus Reducer in patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus.

Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) implantation is currently recommended to relieve angina in patients with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and maximally achievable revascularization. The impact of diabetes mellitus on outcome after CSR implantation is at present unknown. We aimed to explore the impact of CSR in refractory angina patients with diabetes mellitus. Data from consecutive patients undergoing CSR implantation at four different centres between 2014 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the clinical response to CSR implantation defined as an improvement of ≥ 1 classes of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification. A total of 219 patients were included, 116 (53%) of whom had diabetes mellitus. The median age of the population was 69 years and 167 patients (76%) were male. There were no significant differences between groups of patients with and without diabetes mellitus with respect to CCS class at baseline (p value = 0.32) and at follow-up (p = 0.75). Over a median follow-up of 393 [224-1004] days, 84 (72%) of the patients with diabetes mellitus met the primary outcome, similarly to those without diabetes mellitus (p = 0.28). Fifty-three patients (24%) did not have an improvement in CCS class and no one experienced worsening of angina. CSR implantation was equally effective in improving angina symptoms among patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus compared to patients without diabetes mellitus.

Persistent or Recurrent Angina Following Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Persistent or recurrent angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has substantial patient morbidity and economic impact. As knowledge of the pathophysiology of this condition has evolved, new tools for accurate diagnosis and treatment have become available. We provide a current, comprehensive review of mechanisms of post-PCI angina, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS: The routine use of functional testing during PCI may enable more accurate revascularization. Coronary vasomotor disorders commonly cause angina after PCI in the absence of obstructive epicardial CAD. Invasive coronary vasoreactivity testing can enable phenotype-guided therapy of coronary vasomotor disorders with improvement in angina. Multiple nonpharmacologic modalities to treat refractory angina are under development. A comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of persistent or recurrent angina after PCI with noninvasive and invasive techniques is required. An individualized, phenotype-guided management using lifestyle, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic modalities is necessary to optimize outcomes.

Single-Center Experience With High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) which was first used in 1987 and led to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris episodes, less consumption of short-acting nitrates, and an improvement in the quality of life. The conventional mode of stimulation leads to paresthesia felt at the target area. In recent years novel modes of stimulation have been developed that are paresthesia free, such as "burst," "high-density (HD)," or "high-frequency/10 kHz" stimulation. To date, these new modes of stimulation have not been used in patients with RAP and a spinal cord stimulator. This retrospective, single-center, observational study gives a description of the experience of using HD stimulation in selected patients with RAP being treated with SCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with RAP who received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment at our center from September 2009 to February 2021 were screened. Patients were eligible for inclusion into this retrospective, observational study if 1) patients had used HD stimulation, or 2) were currently using HD stimulation. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients out of a total of 157 patients who had a spinal cord stimulator due to RAP use or have used HD stimulation. In most patients (79.2%), the reason for switching from conventional to HD stimulation was due to progression of symptoms under conventional stimulation. The average duration of conventional stimulation use prior to switching to HD stimulation was 40.3 (± 29.6) months. In total, 26 patients (of 53 patients; 49.1%) were using HD stimulation at the end of the follow-up period or until lost to follow-up, and two patients used both forms of stimulation interchangeably. Five patients (9.4%) had stopped using SCS, and 20 patients (37.7%) switched back to conventional stimulation due to a variety of reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that the use of HD stimulation in patients with RAP being treated with SCS could be an alternative option for conventional stimulation. Due to the nature of this study, additional research is essential to confirm these initial findings.

Epicardial delivery of XC001 gene therapy for refractory angina coronary treatment (The EXACT Trial): Rationale, design, and clinical considerations.

BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory angina (RA) have poor quality of life and new therapies are needed. XC001 is a novel adenoviral vector expressing multiple isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoting an enhanced local angiogenic effect. METHODS: The Epicardial Delivery of XC001 Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina Coronary Treatment (EXACT) trial is a 6-month (with 6-month extension) phase 1/2, first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with RA. The trial will enroll 33 patients in an initial (n = 12) ascending dose-escalation phase (1 × 109, 1 × 1010, 4 × 1010, and 1 × 1011 viral particles), followed by phase 2 (n = 21) assessing the highest tolerated dose. Patients must have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II-IV angina on maximally tolerated medical therapy without options for conventional revascularization, demonstrable ischemia on stress testing, and angina limiting exercise tolerance. XC001 will be delivered directly to ischemic myocardium via surgical transthoracic epicardial access. The primary outcome is safety via adverse event monitoring through 6 months. Efficacy assessments include difference from baseline to month 6 in time to 1 mm of ST segment depression, time to angina, and total exercise duration; myocardial blood flow at rest, and stress and coronary flow reserve by positron emission tomography; quality of life; CCS functional class; and angina frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The EXACT trial will determine whether direct intramyocardial administration of XC001 in patients with RA is safe and evaluate its effect on exercise tolerance, myocardial perfusion, angina and physical activity, informing future clinical investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04125732.

Coronary sinus size and ischemia improvement after reducer implantation; "one size to fit them all?"

AIM: Coronary sinus (CS) reducer implantation is associated with symptomatic relief of patients with refractory angina. However, 15% to 30% of the patients do not respond to this treatment. Aim if this study was to evaluate the effect of CS size in the effectiveness of the device. METHODS: Prior to device implantation and at 4-month resting ventricular function was assessed by stress cardiac magnetic resonance. Ischemia was assessed by the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). RESULTS: Fifteen patients (66 ± 10 years) underwent successful CS Reducer implantation, with improvements in angina class and exercise tolerance. Patients with a smaller CS size (<5.8 mm) presented a significantly higher percentage increase in MPRI (63 ± 51 vs 9 ± 30%, P = .03) and a higher reduction in left ventricle end-diastolic volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Greater benefits, in terms of ischemia improvement, after CS Reducer implantation were seen in patients with smaller CS sizes, suggesting a potential mechanism underlying the observed rates of reducer non-responsiveness.

Coronary Sinus Reducer for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: Will This Challenge the Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of angina despite optimal medical therapy is high among patients with coronary chronic total occlusions. Despite advancements in techniques and operator's experience, percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions is still associated with a not negligible risk of failures and complications. The Coronary Sinus Reducer, a new device developed to improve angina, has shown promising results in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with refractory symptoms. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence so far available and to guide clinicians in the selection of patients with chronic total occlusions that could benefit more from Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation. RECENT FINDINGS: A recently published study suggests a clear value of this device in patients with chronic total occlusions. This is likely to be related to the presence of a well-developed collateral circulation. A careful evaluation of risks and benefits of both myocardial revascularization and Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation should be done in all the cases in order to better define the optimal strategy for the patient. The Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation has a rationale in patients with chronic total occlusion as an alternative or additional therapy to myocardial revascularization.

The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience.

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5­year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6­month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy.

Coronary sinus reducer implantation in the middle cardiac vein for the treatment of refractory angina.

Coronary sinus Reducer is a current therapeutic treatment for patients with persistent refractory angina. We report a case of successful implantation of the device in the middle cardiac vein of a 65 years old female patient. The singular and unusual site for the Reducer was planned after a careful assessment of the venous drainage of the ischemic territory.

The impact of the coronary sinus reducer upon left ventricular function in patients with refractory angina pectoris.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation upon left ventricular (LV) function. BACKGROUND: CS Reducer implantation is associated with symptomatic relief in patients with refractory angina. The effects of the device upon left ventricular function remains unknown. METHODS: Prior to device implantation and at 4-months, resting ventricular volumes and function were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Stress CMR was performed to extract quantitative indices of myocardial perfusion (myocardial perfusion reserve index-MPRI). RESULTS: Nineteen patients (18 males, 66.0 [IQR 56.0-77.0] years), underwent successful Reducer implantation. Sixteen (84%) patients improved by at least 1 CCS class. Four months after Reducer implantation, we noticed a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (61 [IQR 47-71] to 66 [IQR 57-72] %; p = .009), a reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)/Body surface area (BSA) (65.7 [IQR 57.4-89.6] to 64.7 [IQR 53.7-74.1] mL/m2 ; p = .036) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)/BSA (28.7 [IQR 18.6-38.8] to 20.0 [IQR 15.0-31.4] mL/m2 ; p = .007). Patients with reduced EF (EF < 50%, n = 6) presented a greater increase of EF at follow up compared to patients with preserved EF (11.3 [IQR 6.5-54.5] vs. 3.8 [IQR 0.6-9.1] %; p = .029). The observed decrease in LVESV/BSA was greater in patients with reduced EF (23.6 [IQR 11.6-33.8] vs. 4.2 [IQR -2.0 to 8.4] mL/m2 ; p = .005). A significant increase in transmural MPRI was observed 4 months after Reducer implantation (p < .011). CONCLUSIONS: CS Reducer improved angina symptoms and improved left ventricular function. The improvement was pronounced in the subgroup of patients with reduced ejection fraction. Myocardial perfusion improvement could represent the underlying mechanism for the observed benefits.

Implantation of a Coronary Sinus Reducer to Treat Refractory Angina in a 38-Year-Old with an Anomalous Left Coronary Artery and No Revascularization Options.

A 38-year-old female with anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery presented with refractory angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class 4). Having failed two previous internal mammary artery grafts to the left anterior descending artery and with no percutaneous revascularization options, she underwent coronary sinus reducer implantation, which improved her symptoms (CCS 0), quality of life, and corresponded to an improvement in ischemia on myocardial perfusion scanning. This case report describes an unusual case of refractory angina in the context of congenital heart disease, illustrates the benefit of this novel hourglass-shaped stent in improving ischemia, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and highlights the importance of managing these patients in multidisciplinary teams.

Neoangiogenesis connecting a left internal mammary artery proximal stump to an ischemic area of the heart after bypass occlusion.

Internal mammary arteries (IMAs), via angiogenesis/arteriogenesis, have great potential for developing collaterals. This generally occurs when ischemia involves the inferior limbs or heart. Although this phenomenon may be spontaneous, it seems to be promoted by iatrogenic or voluntary occlusion of the IMAs. We present a patient who underwent triple coronary artery bypass grafting with two saphenous vein grafts and a free-graft left IMA and suffered an acute myocardial infarction 6 weeks after surgery. Emergency coronary angiography revealed occlusion of the grafts and an amazing branch arising from the proximal stump of the surgically-cut and clipped IMA, leading to the anterior wall of the heart, functionally creating an effective natural bypass, probably stimulated both by anterior wall ischemia and interrupted flow within the proximal left IMA.

Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation.

AIMS: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the severity of the angina pectoris. The aim of this prospective, single-arm observational study is to show this effect in a single-centre cohort using a multidisciplinary team approach to the selection process, with a follow-up period of 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2010 and March 2017, 87 patients with RAP referred to our centre received SCS. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) were completed at baseline, prior to implantation, and 1 year post-implantation. After 1 year of follow-up there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks from more than 4 times a day to 1-2 times a week (p < 0.001). The SAQ showed statistically significant improvement in four of the five dimensions: physical limitation (p < 0.001), angina frequency (p < 0.001), angina stability (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). The RAND-36 showed statistically significant improvement in all nine dimensions: physical functioning (p = 0.001), role/physical (p < 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.03), role/emotional (p < 0.05), bodily pain (p < 0.001), general health (p < 0.001), vitality (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.02) and health change (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of angina pectoris severity after 1 year of follow-up in patients treated with SCS for RAP.

Autologous adipose-derived stromal cell treatment for patients with refractory angina (MyStromalCell Trial): 3-years follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Stem cell therapy is investigated as a treatment option for patients with ischemic heart disease. In this study, long-term safety and efficacy of autologous intra-myocardial injections of adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) was studied in patients with refractory angina. METHODS: Sixty patients with coronary artery stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were 2:1 randomised to intramyocardial injections of ASCs or saline and followed for 3 years. RESULTS: For patients in the ASC group, the bicycle exercise time and the exercise performance in watt were un-changed (383 ± 30 s to 370 ± 44 s, P = 0.052 and 81 ± 6 to 78 ± 10, P = 0.123, respectively), but the performance in METs was reduced significantly (4.2 ± 0.3 to 4.0 ± 0.4, P = 0.027) during the follow-up period. However, in the same period, there was in the placebo group a significant decline in bicycle exercise time (437 ± 53 s to 383 ± 58 s, P = 0.001), the exercise performance measured in watt (87 ± 12 W to 80 ± 12 W, P = 0.019) and in METs (4.5 ± 0.4 to 4.1 ± 0.4, P = 0.002). Moreover, angina measured as CCS class was significantly reduced in the ASC group but not in the placebo group (2.5 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.002 and 2.5 ± 0.8 to 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.186, respectively). However, no significant change was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving ASCs had improved cardiac symptoms and unchanged exercise capacity, in opposition to deterioration in the placebo group. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01449032. Registered 7 October 2011-Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01449032?term=jens+kastrup&rank=7.

Autologous CD34+ Cell Therapy for Ischemic Tissue Repair.

In 1997, the seminal manuscript by Asahara, Murohara, Isner et al outlined the evidence for the existence of circulating, bone marrow-derived cells capable of stimulating and contributing to the formation of new blood vessels. Consistent with the paradigm shift that this work represented, it triggered much scientific debate and controversy, some of which persists 2 decades later. In contrast, the clinical application of autologous CD34 cell therapy has been marked by a track record of consistent safety and clinical benefit in multiple ischemic conditions. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical evidence from over 700 patients in clinical trials of CD34 cell therapy.