RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Academic physicians, such as those affiliated with National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, may have different practice patterns regarding the use of high-cost cancer drugs than nonacademic physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this cohort study, we linked cancer registry, administrative, and demographic data for patients with newly diagnosed cancer in North Carolina from 2004 to 2011. We selected cancer types with multiple U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved, National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended treatment options and large differences in reimbursement between higher-priced and lower-priced options (stage IV colorectal, stage IV lung, and stage II-IV head-and-neck cancers). We assessed whether provider's practice setting-NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center ("NCI") versus other location ("non-NCI")-was associated with use of higher-cost treatment options. We used inverse probability of exposure weighting to control for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 800 eligible patients, 79.6% were treated in non-NCI settings. Patients treated in non-NCI settings were more likely to receive high-cost treatment than patients treated in NCI settings (36.0% vs. 23.2%), with an unadjusted prevalence difference of 12.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-20.0%). After controlling for potential confounding factors, non-NCI patients remained more likely to receive high-cost treatment, although the strength of association was attenuated (adjusted prevalence difference, 9.6%; 95% CI -0.1%-18.7%). Exploratory analyses suggested potential heterogeneity across cancer type and insurance status. CONCLUSION: Use of higher-cost cancer treatments may be more common in non-NCI than NCI settings. This may reflect differential implementation of clinical evidence, local practice variation, or possibly a response to the reimbursement incentives presented by chemotherapy billing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology care delivery and practice patterns may vary between care settings. By comparing otherwise similar patients treated in National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers with those treated elsewhere, this study suggests that patients may be more likely to receive treatment with certain expensive cancer drugs if treated in the non-NCI setting. These practice differences may result in differences in patient costs and outcomes as a result of where they receive treatment.
Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Background and Purpose- Hospital uptake of evidence-based stroke care is variable. We aimed to determine the impact of a multicomponent program involving financial incentives and quality improvement interventions, on stroke care processes. Methods- A prospective study of interventions to improve clinical care quality indicators at 19 hospitals in Queensland, Australia, during 2010 to 2015, compared with historical controls and 23 other Australian hospitals. After baseline routine audit and feedback (control phase, 30 months), interventions involving financial incentives (21 months) and then addition of externally facilitated quality improvement workshops with action plan development (9 months) were implemented. Postintervention phase was 13 months. Data were obtained for the analysis from a previous continuous audit in Queensland and subsequently the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Primary outcome: change in median composite score for adherence to ≤8 indicators. Secondary outcomes: change in adherence to self-selected indicators addressed in action plans and 4 national indicators compared with other Australian hospitals. Multivariable analyses with adjustment for clustered data. Results- There were 17 502 patients from the intervention sites (median age, 74 years; 46% women) and 20 484 patients from other Australian hospitals. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was an 18% improvement in the primary outcome across the study periods (95% CI, 12%-24%). The largest improvement was following introduction of financial incentives (14%; 95% CI, 8%-20%), while indicators addressed in action plans provided an 8% improvement (95% CI, 1%-17%). The national score (4 indicators) improved by 17% (95% CI, 13%-20%) versus 0% change in other Australian hospitals (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03). Access to stroke units improved more in Queensland than in other Australian hospitals ( P<0.001). Conclusions- The quality improvement interventions significantly improved clinical practice. The findings were primarily driven by financial incentives, but were also contributed to by the externally facilitated, quality improvement workshops. Assessment in other regions is warranted.
Assuntos
Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Queensland/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: While physician self-referral has been associated with increased health care use, the downstream effects of the practice remain poorly characterized. Accordingly we identified the relationship between urologist self-referral and downstream health care use in patients with urinary stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With urologist self-referral status as the exposure of interest, we performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 to 2010 to evaluate the relationship between self-referral and imaging intensity, risk of surgical treatment and time to surgical treatment for urinary stone disease. RESULTS: We identified dose dependent increases in computerized tomography use with increasing stratum of urologist self-referral. Compared to nonself-referring urologists, computerized tomography use was 1.19 times higher (95% CI 1.07-1.34) in episodes ascribed to intermediate frequency (5 to 9) and 1.32 times higher (95% CI 1.16-1.50) in episodes ascribed to high frequency (10+) self-referring urologists. Self-referral was inversely associated with risk of surgical treatment for stone disease. Specifically, patients treated by intermediate and high frequency self-referring urologists were less likely to undergo surgical treatment than those treated by nonself-referring urologists, with HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.99) and HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.99), respectively. We identified no statistically significant between-group differences in time to surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Self-referral is associated with increased use of computerized tomography and with decreased use of surgery for stone disease. While policy efforts to further restrict physician self-referral may reduce the use of computerized tomography, they may also result in unintended consequences with respect to patterns of surgical care.
Assuntos
Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorreferência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Cálculos Urinários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pay-for-performance programs to improve the quality of health care are extending gradually, particularly en Primary Health Care. Our aim was to explore the relationship between the degree of compliance with the process indicators (PrI) of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Primary Care and linkage to incentives. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study. SETTING: Six Primary Health Care centers in Seville Aljarafe District randomly selected and stratified by population size. PARTICIPANTS: From 3.647 adults included in Integrated Healthcare Process of T2DM during 2008, 366 patients were included according sample size calculation by stratified random sampling. MEASUREMENTS: PrI: eye and feet examination, glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, microalbuminuria and electrocardiogram. Confounding: Age, gender, characteristics town for patients and professional variables. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.36 years (standard deviation [DE]: 11,56); 48.9% were women. PrI with better compliance were feet examination, glycated hemoglobin and lipid profile (59.6%, 44.3% and 44%, respectively). 2.7% of patients had simultaneous compliance of the six PrI and 11.74% of patients three PrI linkage to incentives. Statistical association was observed in the compliance of the PrI incentives linked or not (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of compliance with the PrI for screening chronic complications of T2DM is mostly low but this was higher on indicators linked to incentives.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Reembolso de Incentivo , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , MotivaçãoRESUMO
The HITECH Act aimed to leverage Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to improve efficiency, quality, and patient safety. Patient safety and EHR use have been understudied, making it difficult to determine if EHRs improve patient safety. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of EHRs and attesting to Meaningful Use (MU) on Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs). A multivariate regression analysis was performed using a generalized linear model method to examine the impact of EHR use on PSIs. Fully implemented EHRs not attesting to MU had a positive impact on three PSIs, and hospitals that attested to MU had a positive impact on two. Attesting to MU or having a fully implemented EHR were not drivers of PSI-90 composite score, suggesting that hospitals may not see significant differences in patient safety with the use of EHR systems as hospitals move towards pay-for-performance models. Policy and practice may want to focus on defining metrics and PSIs that are highly preventable to avoid penalizing hospitals through reimbursement, and work toward adopting advanced analytics to better leverage EHR data. These findings will assist hospital leaders to find strategies to better leverage EHRs, rather than relying on achieving benchmarks of MU objectives.
Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Uso Significativo , Hospitais , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Reembolso de Incentivo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the average productivity of radiologists, as measured by number of reports issued per 6-h shift, evaluating variables that could affect the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a study utilizing an online questionnaire sent to radiologists affiliated with the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging. The questions were related to the demographic profile and professional practice characteristics (form of remuneration, primary imaging method employed, and subspecialty) of the radiologists, as well as their individual productivity (average personal productivity) and the productivity considered reasonable in a 6-h shift. The association between productivity and the practice characteristics of the radiologists was determined by using Poisson regression to calculate the prevalence ratio. RESULTS: A total of 510 radiologists completed the questionnaire. The great majority of the respondents (84%) reported that their remuneration is directly related to their productivity. The productivity varied according to the subspecialty, work environment, and remuneration model. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the productivity of radiologists is associated with the characteristics of their employment. We hope that this study will encourage other studies aimed at evaluating the productive capacity of the radiologists in Brazil, addressing the various functions they perform in their daily routine, including activities other than issuing reports.
OBJETIVO: Estimar a produtividade média dos radiologistas brasileiros em número de laudos emitidos por período de trabalho de seis horas, analisando variáveis que possam influenciar os resultados. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Pesquisa realizada por meio de questionários online respondidos por radiologistas brasileiros afiliados ao Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. As questões incluíram dados demográficos e profissionais dos radiologistas (forma de remuneração, método de imagem de atuação e subespecialidade) e a produtividade individual e a considerada razoável em um período de seis horas de trabalho. A associação entre a produtividade e as características de trabalho dos radiologistas foi calculada pela razão de prevalência, por meio da regressão de Poisson. RESULTADOS: Ao todo, 510 radiologistas responderam ao questionário. A grande maioria dos respondedores (84%) relatou que a sua remuneração está diretamente relacionada à produtividade. A produtividade variou em função da subespecialidade de atuação, ambiente de trabalho e modelo de remuneração. CONCLUSÃO: Demonstramos a associação entre a produtividade do radiologista e as características relacionadas à forma de trabalho. Esperamos que este estudo impulsione outras pesquisas que avaliem a capacidade produtiva do radiologista brasileiro, considerando as diversas funções exercidas por este profissional em sua rotina de trabalho, contemplando outras atividades, além da emissão de laudos.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 'cycle of care' (COC) pay for performance (PFP) programme, introduced in 2015, has resourced Irish GPs to provide structured care to PCRS eligible patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). AIM: To investigate the effect of COC on management processes. DESIGN &SETTING: Cross-sectional observational study undertaken with two points of comparison (2014 and 2017) in participating practices (Republic of Ireland general practices), with comparator data from the United Kingdom National Diabetes Audit (UKNDA) 2015-2016. METHOD: Invitations to participate were sent to practices using a discussion forum for Health One clinical software. Participating practices provided data on the processes of care in the management of patients with T2DM. Data on PCRS eligible patients was extracted from the electronic medical record system of participating practices using secure customised software. Descriptive analysis, using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 25), was performed. RESULTS: Of 250 practices invited, 41 practices participated (16.4%), yielding data from 3146 patients. There were substantial improvements in the rates of recording of glycosylated haemoglobin ([HbA1c] 53.1%-98.3%), total cholesterol ([TC] 59.2%-98.8%), urinary albumin:creatinine ratio ([ACR] 9.9%-42.3%), blood pressure ([BP] 61.4%-98.2%), and body-mass index ([BMI] 39.8%-97.4%) from 2014 to 2017. For the first time, rates of retinopathy screening (76.3%), foot review (64.9%), and influenza immunisation (69.9%) were recorded. Comparison of 2017 data with UKNDA 2015-2016 was broadly similar. CONCLUSION: The COC demonstrated much improved rates of recording of clinical and biochemical parameters, and improved achievement of targets in TC and BP, but not HbA1c. Results demonstrate substantial improvements in the processes and quality of care in the management of patients with T2DM.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospitals are increasingly being held responsible for their readmissions rates. The contribution of hospital versus patient factors (eg, case mix) to hospital readmissions is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative contribution of hospital and patient factors to readmissions after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified individuals who underwent RC in 2014 in the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). The NRD is a nationally representative (USA), all-payer database that includes readmissions at index and nonindex hospitals. Survey weights were used to generate national estimates. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The main outcome was readmission within 30 d after RC. Using a multilevel mixed-effects model, we estimated the statistical association between patient and hospital characteristics and readmission. A hospital-level random-effects term was used to estimate hospital-level readmission rates while holding patient characteristics constant. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified a weighted sample of 7095 individuals who underwent RC at 341 hospitals in the USA. The 30-d readmission rate was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27.8-31.2%), ranging from 1.4% (95% CI 0.6-2.2%) in the bottom quartile to 73.6% (95% CI 68.4-78.7) in the top. In our multilevel model, female sex and comorbidity score were associated with a higher likelihood of readmission. The hospital random-effects term, encompassing both measured and unmeasured hospital characteristics, contributed minimally to the model for readmission when patient characteristics were held constant at population mean values (pseudo-R2<0.01% for hospital effects). Surgical volume, bed size, hospital ownership, and academic status were not significantly associated with readmission rates when these terms were added to the model. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for patient characteristics, hospital-level effects explained little of the large between-hospital variability in readmission rates. These findings underscore the limitations of using 30-d post-discharge readmissions as a hospital quality metric. PATIENT SUMMARY: The chance of being readmitted after radical cystectomy varies substantially between hospitals. Little of this variability can be explained by hospital-level characteristics, while far more can be explained by patient characteristics and random variability.
Assuntos
Cistectomia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of provider competition under global budgeting on the use of cesarean delivery in Taiwan. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: (1) Quarterly inpatient claims data of all clinics and hospitals with birth-related expenses from 2000 to 2008; (2) file of health facilities' basic characteristics; and (3) regional quarterly point values (price conversion index) for clinics and hospitals, respectively, from the fourth quarter in 1999 to the third quarter in 2008, from the Statistics of the National Health Insurance Administration. STUDY DESIGN: Panel data of quarterly facility-level cesarean delivery rates with provider characteristics, birth volumes, and regional point values are analyzed with the fractional response model to examine the effect of external price changes on provider behavior in birth delivery services. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The decline in de facto prices of health services as a result of noncooperative competition under global budgeting is associated with an increase in cesarean delivery rates, with a high degree of response heterogeneity across different types of provider facilities. CONCLUSIONS: While global budgeting is an effective cost containment tool, intensified financial pressures may lead to unintended consequences of compromised quality due to a shift in provider practice in pursuit of financial rewards.
Assuntos
Orçamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Competição Econômica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Cesárea/economia , Controle de Custos/métodos , Competição Econômica/economia , Feminino , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Taiwan , Adulto JovemRESUMO
California's Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program provided $3.3 billion over 5 years to support 21 public hospitals improve the quality of health care delivery and population health. The Institute for Population Health Improvement provided technical support and quality improvement mentorship to the California Department of Health Care Services in implementing the DSRIP Program. This report describes the following key observations on the implementation of the program: the need to reduce variability in data collection and management, memorialize decision-making processes, build broad quality improvement capacity, define and revisit improvement targets, anticipate evolution of clinical definitions and guidelines, provide frequent feedback to participating hospitals, engage frontline clinicians, balance short- and long-term improvement goals, acknowledge regulatory requirements and improvement efforts that may compete for resources, and build in shared learning and dissemination of interventions. The authors believe this experience with implementing California's DSRIP Program may assist other states as they implement similarly intended reform programs.
Assuntos
Hospitais Públicos/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , California , Fortalecimento Institucional/organização & administração , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/normas , Tomada de Decisões , Hospitais Públicos/normas , Humanos , Motivação , Saúde da População , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reembolso de Incentivo/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) were originally intended for use as a screen for quality of care but are now being used to rank hospitals and to modify hospital reimbursement. PSI data are dependent on accuracy of clinical documentation and coding. Information on whether a PSI event is inherent to the nature of the operation or posed a significant impact on the outcome is lacking. Cases for one year at a single academic center were queried. Cases with target PSIs were included (n = 136). Cases were evaluated for both the inherent nature and significance of injury. Both patient safety officers agreed that the PSI event was inherent to the disease process, and thus, the procedure and was not a marker of patient safety (false positive) in 11.8% to 33.3% of cases. Both reviewers agreed that the events were not clinically significant in 11.8% to 30.4% of cases. This study found high false-positive rates and only moderate interrater reliability for 3 PSIs. PSIs as currently reported are not reliable enough to be utilized for ranking.
Assuntos
Hospitais/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) offers financial incentives to deliver high-quality care for individual diseases, but the single-disease focus takes no account of multimorbidity. AIM: To examine variation in QOF payments for two indicators incentivised in ≥1 disease domain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Modelling study using cross-sectional data from 314 general practices in Scotland. METHOD: Maximum payments that practices could receive under existing financial incentives were calculated for blood pressure (BP) control and influenza immunisation according to the number of coexisting clinical conditions. Payments were recalculated assuming a single new indicator. RESULTS: Payment varied by condition (£4.71-£11.08 for one BP control and £2.09-£5.78 for one influenza immunisation). Practices earned more for delivering the same action in patients with multimorbidity: in patients with 2, 3, and ≥4 conditions mean payments were £13.95, £21.92, and £29.72 for BP control, and £7.48, £11.21, and £15.14 for influenza immunisation, respectively. Practices in deprived areas had more multiple incentivised patients. When recalculated so that each incentivised action was only paid for once, all practices received less for BP control: affluent practices received more and deprived practices received less for influenza immunisation. CONCLUSION: For patients with single conditions, existing QOF payment methods have more than twofold variation in payment for delivering the same process. Multiple payments were common in patients with multimorbidity. A payment method is required that ensures fairness of rewards while maintaining adequate funding for practices based on actual workload.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Medicina Geral/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Reembolso de Incentivo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Planos de Incentivos Médicos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
The use of financial incentives provided to primary care physicians who achieve target management or clinical outcomes has been advocated to support the fulfillment of care recommendations for patients with diabetes. This article explores the characteristics of incentive models implemented in the context of universal healthcare systems in the United Kingdom, Australia, Taiwan and Canada; the extent to which these interventions have been successful in improving diabetes outcomes; and the key challenges and concerns around implementing incentive models. Research in the effect of incentives in the United Kingdom demonstrates some improvements in process outcomes and achievement of cholesterol, blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) targets. Evidence of the efficacy of programs implemented outside of the United Kingdom is very limited but suggests that physicians participating in these enhanced billing incentive programs were already completing the guideline-recommended care prior to the introduction of the incentive. A shift to pay-for-performance programs may have important implications for professionalism and patient-centred care. In the absence of definitive evidence that financial incentives drive the quality of diabetes management at the level of primary care, policy makers should proceed with caution. It is important to look beyond simply modifying physicians' behaviours and address the factors and systemic barriers that make it challenging for patients and physicians to manage diabetes in partnership.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Reembolso de Incentivo , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Motivação , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Abstract Objective: To determine the average productivity of radiologists, as measured by number of reports issued per 6-h shift, evaluating variables that could affect the results. Materials and Methods: This was a study utilizing an online questionnaire sent to radiologists affiliated with the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging. The questions were related to the demographic profile and professional practice characteristics (form of remuneration, primary imaging method employed, and subspecialty) of the radiologists, as well as their individual productivity (average personal productivity) and the productivity considered reasonable in a 6-h shift. The association between productivity and the practice characteristics of the radiologists was determined by using Poisson regression to calculate the prevalence ratio. Results: A total of 510 radiologists completed the questionnaire. The great majority of the respondents (84%) reported that their remuneration is directly related to their productivity. The productivity varied according to the subspecialty, work environment, and remuneration model. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the productivity of radiologists is associated with the characteristics of their employment. We hope that this study will encourage other studies aimed at evaluating the productive capacity of the radiologists in Brazil, addressing the various functions they perform in their daily routine, including activities other than issuing reports.
Resumo Objetivo: Estimar a produtividade média dos radiologistas brasileiros em número de laudos emitidos por período de trabalho de seis horas, analisando variáveis que possam influenciar os resultados. Materiais e Métodos: Pesquisa realizada por meio de questionários online respondidos por radiologistas brasileiros afiliados ao Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem. As questões incluíram dados demográficos e profissionais dos radiologistas (forma de remuneração, método de imagem de atuação e subespecialidade) e a produtividade individual e a considerada razoável em um período de seis horas de trabalho. A associação entre a produtividade e as características de trabalho dos radiologistas foi calculada pela razão de prevalência, por meio da regressão de Poisson. Resultados: Ao todo, 510 radiologistas responderam ao questionário. A grande maioria dos respondedores (84%) relatou que a sua remuneração está diretamente relacionada à produtividade. A produtividade variou em função da subespecialidade de atuação, ambiente de trabalho e modelo de remuneração. Conclusão: Demonstramos a associação entre a produtividade do radiologista e as características relacionadas à forma de trabalho. Esperamos que este estudo impulsione outras pesquisas que avaliem a capacidade produtiva do radiologista brasileiro, considerando as diversas funções exercidas por este profissional em sua rotina de trabalho, contemplando outras atividades, além da emissão de laudos.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Papel Profissional , Reembolso de Incentivo/tendências , Participação no Risco Financeiro/tendências , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Participação no Risco Financeiro/economia , Participação no Risco Financeiro/métodosRESUMO
RESUMEN Objetivos. Estimar el impacto de un esquema de pago por desempeño, denominado convenios de apoyo presupuestario, aplicado por el Gobierno a las tres regiones con mayores tasas de desnutrición crónica infantil (DCI) en 2008, Apurimac, Ayacucho y Huancavelica, sobre indicadores de cobertura de servicios de cuidado infantil (vacunación, controles de crecimiento y desarrollo infantil, suplemento de hierro) y del estado nutricional del niño (desnutrición, anemia, diarrea). Mediante estos convenios se transferían recursos a los presupuestos de dichas regiones condicionados al cumplimiento de compromisos de gestión y metas de cobertura con el objetivo de mejorar el estado nutricional infantil. Materiales y métodos. A partir de los datos de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar de 2008 a 2014, se compara la evolución en los indicadores evaluados de una muestra de niños que residen en los ámbitos donde se suscribieron los convenios y una muestra de control, mientras los convenios estuvieron vigentes y en los años posteriores para reportar el estimador de diferencias en diferencias del impacto promedio de los convenios Resultados. se encuentran impactos positivos sobre el incremento de coberturas de vacunas del esquema básico y de la vacuna rotavirus y, a través de ellos, en la reducción de la ocurrencia de diarrea y desnutrición. Conclusiones. el esquema habría sido efectivo en activar la cadena mayor cobertura de vacunas y menor DCI, pero no parece mejorar la cobertura de otras prestaciones como las atenciones de crecimiento y desarrollo del niño y entrega de suplementos de hierro al niño y gestante.
ABSTRACT To estimate the impact of a payment scheme by performance, known as a budget support agreement, applied by the government in three regions in Peru with the highest rates of chronic malnutrition (CM) in children in 2008-Apurimac, Ayacucho, and Huancavelica-on indicators of health service coverage (immunization, childhood growth and development, and iron supplementation) and the nutritional status of children (malnutrition, anemia, and diarrhea). These agreements were used to transfer resources to the budgets of these regions with the condition of fulfilling management commitments and coverage goals with a view toward improving the nutritional status of children. Materials and methods. Based on data from the Demographic and Family Health Survey conducted from 2008 to 2014, evolution of the indicators in a sample of children residing in the areas where the support programs were signed was compared to that of a control sample in the period in which the agreements were in force and in the subsequent years to estimate differences in the impact of this support strategy. Results. There was a positive impact of the programs on the increase in vaccination coverage provided by the basic health system and rotavirus vaccination, which consequently reduced the rates of diarrhea and malnutrition. Conclusions. The scheme was effective in increasing the vaccination coverage and reducing CM but did not seem to improve the coverage of other benefits, including childhood growth and iron supplementation to children and mothers.