RESUMO
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal dominant trinucleotide disorder that often leads to respiratory dysfunction resulting in hypoventilation symptoms, reduced quality of life and causing premature death if untreated. To early identify symptoms of hypoventilation, the Respicheck questionnaire was developed as a screening tool. Symptomatic therapies like inspiratory muscle training (IMT) are recommended to strengthen respiratory muscles and reduce or even prevent hypoventilation symptoms. Our study aimed to evaluate the Respicheck questionnaire's suitablility to monitor the efficacy of IMT. Patients with genetically confirmed DM1 were randomly assigned to either IMT - endurance or strength training, or control group. At baseline, end of study and four interim visits, pulmonary function tests, Respicheck questionnaire and Epworth sleepiness scale were assessed. While patients in training groups achieved a substantial improvement after nine months of regular IMT in pulmonary function tests, the Respicheck score did not improve likewise. Similarly, the ESS score did not change significantly in both training and control groups. Consequently, we conclude that either improvement of respiratory function is not necessarily associated with clinical improvement, or respiratory muscle weakness was not the only reason for hypoventilation syndrome, or both questionnaires are not sensitive enough to detect slight clinical changes.
Assuntos
Distrofia Miotônica , Humanos , Distrofia Miotônica/complicações , Distrofia Miotônica/diagnóstico , Distrofia Miotônica/terapia , Hipoventilação , Qualidade de Vida , Sonolência , Músculos Respiratórios , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Chronic hypoventilation due to involvement of respiratory muscles is a frequent symptom in autosomal dominant inherited myotonic dystrophies, especially in type 1 (DM1), leading to a severely reduced quality of life, an early need for ventilatory support, or premature death. Thus, early knowledge of respiratory muscle weakness is essential to initiate further diagnostic and therapeutic measures. To get early, simple, and reliable information about respiratory impairment in DM patients, we performed a prospective controlled cohort study with DM1 and DM2 patients analysing the suitability of 'Respiratory involvement symptom checklist (Respicheck) as a clinically meaningful screening questionnaire for ventilatory impairment in patients with DM1 or DM2. Clinical assessments included a one-time pulmonary function test (spirometry and manometry) and the completion of the Respicheck. 172 participants were enrolled in this study (74 DM1, 72 DM2, 26 healthy controls). With a cut-off RespicheckCAT score of 4, the Respicheck can distinguish between patients with and without respiratory impairment with higher sensitivity and positive predictive value for DM1 than DM2 patients (DM1: sensitivity 77-87; positive predictive value 50-94%; DM2: sensitivity 67-80%; positive predictive value 14-38). In summary, our results confirm a clinically meaningful use of the Respicheck to detect respiratory impairments predominantly in DM1 patients.
Assuntos
Distrofia Miotônica , Insuficiência Respiratória , Humanos , Distrofia Miotônica/complicações , Distrofia Miotônica/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Lista de Checagem , Qualidade de Vida , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologiaRESUMO
Symptoms of respiratory involvement are frequently present but overlooked by patients with Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 (DM1). A respiratory symptom checklist was designed to test whether a DM-specifically designed checklist to detect symptoms of respiratory involvement (The Respicheck Questionnaire) could help patients be more aware of their respiratory problems, if any, and help clinicians in identifying potential candidates for intervention. The Respicheck questionnaire was administered to 58 consecutive adult-onset patients with genetically determined DM1 who did not complain of respiratory involvement per history at enrollment. Based on respiratory function test results patients were divided into 3 groups: A, (nâ¯=â¯17) having no signs of respiratory involvement; B (nâ¯=â¯13), patients having borderline results on respiratory assessments and having no need for respiratory intervention; C, (nâ¯=â¯28) patients having respiratory impairment requiring intervention. Respiratory test results and Respicheck scores were analyzed. Respicheck total score and subscales correlated positively with global respiratory impairment. Respicheck appears to be able to discriminate between patients having a higher level of respiratory dysfunction from those having a lower risk of respiratory involvement. This might allow to better target efforts and resources in respiratory management in DM1.