After ten years of follow-up, no difference between supportive care plus immunosuppression and supportive care alone in IgA nephropathy.

The randomized, controlled STOP-IgAN trial in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and substantial proteinuria showed no benefit of immunosuppression added on top of supportive care on renal function over three years. As a follow-up we evaluated renal outcomes in patients over a follow-up of up to ten years in terms of serum creatinine, proteinuria, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and death. The adapted primary endpoint was the time to first occurrence of a composite of death, ESKD, or a decline of over 40% in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline at randomization into STOP-IgAN. Data were analyzed by Cox-regression models. Follow-up data were available for 149 participants, representing 92% of the patients originally randomized. Median follow-up was 7.4 years (inter quartile range 5.7 to 8.3 years). The primary endpoint was reached in 36 of 72 patients randomized to supportive care and 35 of 77 patients randomized to additional immunosuppression (hazard ratio 1.20; 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.92). ESKD occurred in 17 of the patients with supportive care and in 20 of the patients with additional immunosuppression. Additionally, the rates of eGFR loss over 40% and annual eGFR loss did not differ between groups. Two patients died with supportive care and three with additional immunosuppression. Thus, within the limitations of a retrospective study, over a follow-up of up to ten years, and using an adapted primary endpoint, we failed to detect differences in key clinical outcomes in IgAN patients randomized to receive added immunosuppression on top of supportive care versus supportive care alone.

CTLA-4 Polymorphisms in Patients with IgA Nephropathy Correlate with Proteinuria.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common form of primary glomerulonephritis and still constitutes one of the most important causes of end-stage renal disease. Abnormal T cell responses may play a role in IgAN pathogenesis. Co-stimulatory molecules such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) are important for naive T cells to initiate and terminate immune responses. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CTLA4 gene locus are associated with several autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the occurrence of the SNPs -318C/T, +49A/G and CT60 G/A within the CTLA4 locus in healthy blood donors (n=455) and IgAN patients (n=252) recruited from the recently published STOP-IgAN trial. The presence of these SNPs was then associated with baseline proteinuria in IgAN patients. RESULTS: We observed a significantly increased frequency of the CTLA4 -318C/T genotype in IgAN patients as compared to controls (CC vs. CT+TT: OR 1.65, 95%-CI 1.03-2.65, p=0.035). No significant associations, neither with the +49A/G nor for the CT60 G/A SNP, were detected. However, when we stratified for proteinuria at time of inclusion into the STOP-IgAN trial (<1 g/day vs. >1 g/day), we observed significant differences in the frequencies of the CT60 G/A genotype, i.e. a significantly increased risk for higher proteinuria in patients carrying the G allele (OR 2.81, 95%-CI 1.03-7.64, p=0.042). CONCLUSION: The CTLA4 -318/C/T SNP was associated with an increased risk to develop IgAN, while the CT60 G/A genotype significantly associated with the risk for higher proteinuria suggesting a possible role for CTLA-4 in IgAN.

Renal outcomes of STOP-IgAN trial patients in relation to baseline histology (MEST-C scores).

BACKGROUND: The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) defines histologic criteria (MEST-C) that provide prognostic information based on the kidney biopsy. There are few data on the predictive impact of this classification in randomized clinical trial settings. METHODS: We performed an exploratory analysis of MEST-C scores in 70 available renal biopsies from 162 randomized STOP-IgAN trial participants and correlated the results with clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed by researchers blinded to the clinical outcome of the patients. Biopsies had been obtained 6.5 to 95 (median 9.4) months prior to randomization. RESULTS: Mesangial hypercellularity (M1) associated with higher annual eGFR-loss during the 3-year trial (M1: - 5.06 ± 5.17 ml/min/1.73 m2, M0: - 0.79 ± 4.50 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.002). An M0-score additionally showed a weak association with full clinical remission, whereas the percentage of patients losing ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m2 over the 3-year trial phase was higher among those scored as M1. Among patients with additional immunosuppression, ESRD occurred more frequently in patients when tubulointerstitial fibrosis (T1/2) was present (T1/2 = 33%, T0 = 0%, p = 0.008). In patients receiving supportive care only, ESRD frequencies were similar (T1/2 = 18%, T0 = 7%, p = 0.603). At randomization, eGFR was significantly lower when tubulointerstitial fibrosis was present (T1/2: 45.2 ± 15.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, T0: 74.6 ± 28.2 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.0001). Endocapillary hypercellularity (E), and glomerular segmental sclerosis (S) were not associated with any clinical outcome parameter. In the analyzed cohort, patients with glomerular crescents (C1/2 scores) in their biopsies were more likely to develop ESRD during the 3-year trial phase, but this trend was only significant in patients under supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: This secondary analysis of STOP-IgAN biopsies indicates that M1, T1/2 and C1/2 scores associate with worse renal outcomes.

[Considerations on the treatment of IgA nephropathy on the basis of the results of the latest studies (STOP-IgAN, TESTING, NEFIGAN)]. / Terápiás megfontolások IgA-nephropathiában a legutolsó vizsgálatok (STOP-IgAN, TESTING, NEFIGAN) eredményei alapján.

IgA nephropathy is an immune-mediated chronic glomerulonephritis with a great variability in clinical presentation and outcome. The disease can progress to end-stage renal failure in 25% of patients. For this reason we should identify patients with potential to progress. Most important risk factors for progression are persistent proteinuria, hypertension, decreased renal function and some histological lesions. The actually suggested treatment is summarized in KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline from 2012. They suggest to give firstly non-specific supportive treatment (especially renin-angiotensin system blocking agents). Recommendation about steroid/immunosuppression treatment is based on low level of evidence. Recently three studies were organised concerning benefits and risk of steroid/immunosuppressive treatment added together with specific supportive treatment. In the STOP-IgAN study, systemic steroid/immunosuppressive treatment significantly decreased proteinuria but did not stop progression. In the TESTING study, systemic steroid treatment significantly decreased proteinuria and progression. However, the study was recently discontinued due to several severe side effects of steroid treatment. Involvement of intestinal mucosal immunity in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy suggested the NEFIGAN study with budesonide treatment. Budesonide releases corticosteroid in distal small intestine and colon. Proteinuria was significantly decreased and renal function remained stabile. High number of withdrawals owing to adverse effects is a major concern implying a substantial systemic effect of budesonide. We need further information on the characteristics of patients who most likely benefit from steroid/immunosuppressive treatment given after or together with specific supportive treatment. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(49): 1946-1952.

Single versus dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in patients with IgA nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are cornerstones of supportive therapy in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We analyzed the effects of single versus dual RAS blockaQueryde during our randomized STOP-IgAN trial. METHODS: STOP-IgAN participants with available successive information on their RAS treatment regimen and renal outcomes during the randomized 3-year trial phase were stratified post hoc into two groups, i.e. patients under continuous single or dual RAS blocker therapy over the entire 3 years of the trial phase. Primary and secondary STOP-IgAN trial endpoints, i.e. frequencies of full clinical remission, eGFR-loss ≥ 15 and ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and ESRD onset, were analyzed by logistic regression and linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Among the 112 patients included in the present analysis, 82 (73%) were maintained on single and 30 (27%) on dual RAS inhibitor therapy throughout the trial. Neither RAS blocker strategy significantly affected full clinical remission, eGFR-loss rates, onset of ESRD. Proteinuria moderately increased in patients under dual RAS blockade by 0.1 g/g creatinine during the 3-year trial phase. This was particularly evident in patients without additional immunosuppression during the randomized trial phase, where proteinuria increased by 0.2 g/g creatinine in the dual RAS blockade group. In contrast, proteinuria decreased in patients under single RAS blocker therapy by 0.3 g/g creatinine. The course of eGFR remained stable and did not differ between the RAS treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: In the STOP-IgAN cohort, neither RAS blocker regimen altered renal outcomes. Patients on dual RAS blockade even exhibited higher proteinuria over the 3-year trial phase.