Superior semicircular canal dehiscence postoperative outcomes: a case series of 350 repairs.

BACKGROUND: Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) is a dehiscence of the otic capsule which normally lies over the superior semicircular canal. This database constitutes the largest series of SSCD patients to date. OBJECTIVE: To determine what preoperative factors, if any, contribute to postoperative outcomes and evaluate symptom resolution in a large SSCD patient cohort. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective chart review collected patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and pre-and postoperative symptoms. Fisher's exact t-test was performed for unpaired categorical variables, with a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: 350 SSCD repairs were performed. The median age was 52 years (range: 17-86 years, ± 6.4 years), and the median follow-up duration was 4.6 months (range: 0.03-59.5 months, ± 6.8 months). Preoperative hearing loss was significantly associated with female sex (p = 0.0028). The most reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus (77.4%), dizziness (74.0%), autophony (66.3%), amplification (63.7%), and disequilibrium (62.6%). Between patients who received unilateral versus bilateral SSCD repair, the greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony (74.9%, p < 0.001), amplification (77.3%, p = 0.00027), hyperacusis (77.4%, p = 0.023), hearing (62.9%, p = 0.0063), and dizziness (54.6%, p < 0.001) for patients with unilateral SSCD repair. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair via the middle cranial fossa approach can significantly resolve auditory, vestibular, and neurological symptoms of patients with SSCD. Although this is one of the largest single-institution SSCD studies to date, future multi-institutional, prospective studies would be beneficial to validate these results.

Third window lesions of the inner ear: A pictorial review.

PURPOSE: Radiographic review of pathologies that associate with third window syndrome. METHODS: Case series and literature review. RESULTS: Eight unique third window conditions are described and illustrated, including superior, lateral, and posterior semicircular canal dehiscence; carotid-cochlear, facial-cochlear, and internal auditory canal-cochlear dehiscence, labyrinthine erosion from endolymphatic sac tumor, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the characteristic imaging features and symptoms to differentiate third window pathologies for expedient diagnosis and management planning.

Impact of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on cochlear implant audiologic outcomes.

PURPOSE: Determine whether adult cochlear implant users with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence experience clinically significant differences in audiological outcomes when compared to cochlear implant users with normal temporal bone anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single institution review. Adult, post-lingual deaf patients implanted between 2010 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years or older, available preoperative computed tomography imaging, and preoperative and postoperative AzBio audiological data for at least 6 months of cochlear implant use. Preoperative and postoperative AzBio Sentence Test scores were compared between patients with normal temporal bone anatomy and those with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence or near dehiscence. RESULTS: 110 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean AzBio score for normal temporal bone anatomy group improved from 35.2 % (SD 28.2) preoperatively to 70.3 % (SD 25.7) postoperatively, an improvement of 35.1 % (SD 28.6). Mean AzBio score for near dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.6 % (SD 28.9) preoperatively to 64.5 % (SD 30.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 37.9 % (SD 27.9). Mean AzBio score for dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.3 % (SD 20.4) preoperatively to 65.1 % (SD 27.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 38.7 % (SD 26.9). Utilizing the one-way analysis of variance test, there was no significant difference in audiologic outcomes between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with complete or near complete radiographic superior canal dehiscence at the time of cochlear implantation achieve similar improvements in speech perception scores compared to normal anatomy adult cochlear implant users.

Evaluation of clinical predictors of postoperative outcomes in tegmen defect patients with and without concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence and cerebrospinal fluid leak.

OBJECTIVES: Tegmen and superior semicircular canal defects have been well studied, yet the factors contributing to their onset and progression are widely debated. The clinical utility of intraoperative intracranial pressure measurements has yet to be tested. This report aims to use intraoperative opening pressure and concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) to analyze factors influencing disease course and clinical outcomes in patients with tegmen dehiscence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent tegmen defect repair was performed. Multiple variables of interest including body mass index (BMI), presence of SSCD, presence of dural venous sinus stenosis, opening pressure, and acetazolamide therapy use were recorded. The cohort was divided into those with or without concurrent SSCD and those presenting with or without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak for analysis. RESULTS: A linear relationship between opening pressure and BMI (p = 0.009) was noted; however, intraoperative opening pressure was not associated with disease outcome. Concurrent SSCD was present in 25 % of patients, while 62 % presented with CSF leak. The concurrent SSCD group exhibited higher opening pressure, higher likelihood of having dural sinus stenosis, and higher likelihood of being discharged on acetazolamide. The CSF leak group had higher likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea and persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing tegmen defect repair, concurrent SSCD suggests increased disease severity. The presence of preoperative CSF leak predicts persistent symptoms following repair. BMI is linearly correlated with intracranial pressure in these patients.

Association of the superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani dehiscences and its relationship with the pneumatisation of the temporal bone.

PURPOSE: To analyse the degree of pneumatisation of the temporal bone when there is an association between dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal and dehiscence of the tegmen tympani. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed a retrospective CT study of 124 selected cases. A single inclusion criterion was applied: the presence of a dehiscence of the tegmen tympani. On the other hand, the degree of temporal pneumatisation was assessed by axial and coronal planes, and has been divided into the following grades O, I, II and III, according to the status and relationship of the mastoid, the bony labyrinth, the petrous segment of the carotid canal and sigmoid sinus. RESULTS: Of the 124 cases studied, 35 (28.2%) presented both dehiscences. In 26 of the 35 (47.3%), grade II pneumatisation, 4 (14,8%), grade I, and 5 (11,9%) grade III was observed, with a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.001). On the other hand, we did not find a significant relationship when relating both dehiscences in any age or sex group. However, when relating the degree of pneumatisation to sex, among those with grade III pneumatisation, the proportion of men (52.4%) was significantly higher than that of women (47.6%) (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: We have detected a statistically significant relationship between the coexistence of grade II pneumatisation and the presence of both dehiscences in the temporal bone.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence in relation with the superior petrosal sinus: our experience, surgical management and systematic review of literature.

PURPOSE: Most of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) are located in the apical region of the SSC. However, in a small number of cases, it may be situated in the medial wall, causing the SSC to contact with the superior petrosal sinus (SPS). The aim of this study is to describe four patients with SSCD involving the superior petrosal sinus (SSCD-SPS) and to perform a review of the literature. METHODS: Observational retrospective study of patients diagnosed of SSCD-SPS in a tertiary referral center. A systematic review was made, identifying 7 articles in the literature. Clinical presentation, complementary test (pure-tone audiometry, PTA; vestibular evoked myogenic potential, VEMP; computed tomography, CT), therapeutic management and outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Four new cases of SSCD-SPS are reported, in three of them a transmastoid plugging was performed. 54 patients with SSCD-SPS (57 dehiscences) were reported in the literature. The most frequent symptoms were aural pressure (57.41%) and vertigo provoked by pressure/Valsalva (55.55%). Conductive hearing loss was the most common finding in PTA (47.37%). Abnormally low thresholds were observed in 59.46% of reported VEMP. Transmastoid approach was used in ten cases, middle fossa approach in four, round window reinforcement in one, and occlusion of the SPS using coils in two. CONCLUSIONS: Within SSCD, we have encountered a rare subtype characterized by its medial wall location in close proximity to the SPS. This subgroup needs special consideration as it has shown its own distinct characteristics. Regarding therapeutic management, we advocate a transmastoid approach.

The importance of bone density and anatomical structure in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the importance of bone density, surface area, and diameter of anatomical structures of the superior semicircular canal (SSC), lateral semicircular canal (LSC), posterior semicircular canal (PSC), utricle, and saccule in patients diagnosed with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bone density, surface area, and diameter of SSC, LSC, PSC, utricle, and saccule were measured and compared between the SSCD group and control group. Fifteen ears in the SSCD group and 60 ears in the control group were evaluated. Additionally, within the SSCD group, the dehiscent and healthy sides were evaluated independently. RESULTS: SSC's bone density was significantly lower in the SSCD group compared to the control group (p = 0.008). No significant differences were found in surface area and diameter between the groups (p > 0.05). While most of the anatomical structures showed no significant difference in bone density between dehiscent and healthy ears (p > 0.05), SSC bone density was significantly lower in affected ears (p = 0.000) in SSCD group. CONCLUSION: Based on the data obtained in this study, bone density and anatomical structure may be useful in patients diagnosed with SSCD.

Comparison of Superior Semicircular Canal Bone Thickness and Patterns in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Patients and Normal Controls: A CBCT Study.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) is a recently-defined developmental defect may be associated with several craniofacial anomalies such as Cleft Lip/Palate (CLP). The present study aimed to compare subjects with unilateral and bilateral CLP and normal controls in terms of Superior Semicircular Canal (SSC) bone thickness and pattern.A total of 238 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were collected from 52 unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP) subjects (104 temporal bones) and 38 Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (BCLP) (76 temporal bones) subjects and 148 healthy controls (296 temporal bones). The SSC bone thickness was measured twice and validated by a maxillofacial radiologist. The samples were then classified into five categories based on bone thickness: papyraceous or thin, normal, thick, pneumatized, and dehiscence. After all, the UCLP, BCLP, and normal control groups were compared concerning the SSC pattern and thickness.The results revealed no significant difference among the three groups regarding the SSC pattern and thickness based on gender. The SSC patterns (P value = .001) and SSC thickness (0.01) were strongly correlated to the cleft type. The thinnest bone thickness and the highest incidence of SSCD were observed among the subjects with BCLP.The results showed a significant association between the SSC patterns and SSC thickness and the study groups.

[Method of registration of vestibular myogenic evoked potentials in the diagnosis of diseases of the inner ear]. / Metod registratsii vestibulyarnykh miogennykh vyzvannykh potentsialov v diagnostike zabolevanii vnutrennego ukha.

The literature review is devoted to the practical application of the method of recording vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in the diagnosis of the inner ear diseases: superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome, Meniere's disease, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), vestibular neuritis. Registration of VMEP is an electrophysiological research method that allows to assess objectively the functional state of the otolith receptors (sacculus and utriculus) and their pathways, which expands the diagnostic capabilities in diagnosis of the inner ear diseases.

Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate a relationship between idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal (SSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 (114 ears) individuals, 20 of whom were controls and 37 of whom were IIH, were included in the study. Individuals were evaluated with 0.8 mm slice thickness computed tomography (CT) images for SSC bony roof thickness and SSCD. Thickness of the bony roof over the SSC was graded from Grade 1 to Grade 4. Grade 3 was defined as pre-dehiscence and Grade 4 as dehiscence. RESULTS: Bony roof thickness was 1.25 mm in the control group and 0.76 mm in the IIH group. When bony roof thickness was compared between the groups, it was found to be significantly thinner in the IIH group (p = 0.012). In the IIH group, while dehiscence was detected in 25 of 74 ears, no dehiscence was detected in 49 ears. In the control group, while dehiscence was detected in 5 ears, no dehiscence was detected in 35 ears. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.015). The correlation between bony roof thickness and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the IIH group was not statistically significant (p = 0.343; rho = 0.110). The correlation between bony roof thickness and age in the IIH group was not statistically significant (p = 0.082; rho = - 0.164). CONCLUSION: Increased CSF pressure in patients with IIH may cause chronic, progressive, and irreversible damage to the bone of the SSC and, according to our study, the rate of SSCD was found to be high in IIH patients.

Influence of Semicircular Canal Dehiscence on Cochlear Implant Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) is defined as a defect of the bone overlying the semicircular canal. It has a relatively high prevalence of 3% in the general population, which makes it likely that a certain number of patients receiving a cochlear implant (CI) would have it. However, little is known about the influence of SCD on the CI outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of SCD on CI outcome with regard to short- and long-term word perception and hearing preservation. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of postoperative word perception ability in the electric-only condition after 6, 12, and ≥18 months and of hearing preservation 4 weeks after surgery in CI recipients with and without SCD. All patients received a preoperative 1.5- or 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included. Forty-eight patients (87%) had no SCD, and 7 patients (13%) had SCD. Mean postoperative word perception scores were 66% in the non-SCD group versus 50% in the SCD group (p = 0.17) after 6 months, 74 versus 64% (p = 0.28) after 12 months, and 77 versus 73% (p = 0.62) after 18 or more months. The mean postoperative hearing loss in patients with functional residual hearing before surgery (n = 34) was 22 dB in the non-SCD group versus 31 dB in the SCD group (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: CI outcome is comparable between recipients without and with SCD. Specifically, hearing preservation rate and word perception ability in the electric-only condition seem not affected by SCD. The rate of progress of word perception ability in the first 12 months after cochlear implantation is not influenced by SCD.

Elevated ocular VEMP responses in the absence of a superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) have an accepted role in the diagnosis of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) syndrome. The current impression is that ocular VEMPs (oVEMPs) are more sensitive than cervical VEMPs (cVEMPs) for detecting a SSCD and that oVEMP testing in response to air conducted sound provides an excellent screening test without risk of radiation exposure from computerized tomography (CT). AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To report on patients with elevated oVEMP amplitudes but without evidence for a SSCD on multiplanar CT imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients referred for vestibular function testing to our department. Patients with oVEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes ≥17 µν without evidence for a SSCD on imaging were evaluated. RESULTS: 26 patients had oVEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes ≥17 µν with no evidence of a SSCD on imaging. The most common diagnosis was Meniere's disease in those identified. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: oVEMPs can provide false positive results for diagnosis of a SSCD and an elevated oVEMP amplitude in itself is insufficient for diagnosis of a SSCD.

MRI contribution for the detection of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

PURPOSE: Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome, which can only be treated by surgery, present cochleo-vestibular symptoms related to a third-mobile window but also endolymphatic hydrops. Since cVEMP and oVEMP are disturbed by the presence of the dehiscence, the aim of the study is to assess the value of MRI for the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome in comparison with cVEMP and oVEMP. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we enrolled 33 ears in 24 patients with superior semicircular dehiscence syndrome who underwent a 4-h delayed intravenous Gd-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MRI and pure tone audiometry, cVEMP and oVEMP. For each patient MRI images were evaluated by two radiologists who used a compartmental endolymphatic hydrops grading system in comparison with cVEMP and oVEMP. RESULTS: Endolymphatic hydrops was found on MRI in 9 out of 33 SCDS ears (27.3%). We found no significant correlation between the presence of endolymphatic hydrops on MRI and cVEMP and oVEMP (p = 0.36 and p = 0.7, respectively). However, there was a significant correlation between the presence of endolymphatic hydrops on MRI and the degree of sensorineural hearing loss, Air Conduction-Pure Tone Average level (p = 0.012) and Bone Conduction-Pure Tone Average level (p = 0.09), respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that EH might be observed in 27.3% of superior semicircular dehiscence syndrome ears. The role of inner ear MRI is important to detect endolymphatic hydrops, since cVEMP and oVEMP are disturbed by the presence of the dehiscence, because these patients could benefit from a medical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Quality of life outcomes after transmastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact on quality of life in patients undergoing plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence using the transmastoid approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review with prospective outcomes assessment, using validated quantitative scoring systems, was performed on 10 patients (23-76 years) who underwent transmastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence between February 2014 and February 2018 at a tertiary referral center. Pre-operative and post-operative autophony and vertigo were measured by The Autophony Index and the Dizziness Handicap Index. Overall quality of life following intervention was measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Subjective improvement, audiological changes, and subjective quality of life changes were also recorded. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the total Dizziness Handicap Index was seen following transmastoid repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (p = 0.0078). This was also evident when subgroup analysis of the Dizziness Handicap Index was performed, as physical (p = 0.0273), emotional (p = 0.0078), and functional subgroups were all significantly reduced (p = 0.0117). Autophony was also significantly reduced following intervention (p = 0.0312). Overall quality of life was seen to be improved following surgery as measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (p = 0.0345). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that transmastoid plugging of a dehiscence in the superior semicircular canal is a safe and effective means of improving autophony, dizziness and overall quality of life in these patients. We believe that these results should be taken into consideration in discussions regarding surgical approach for patients who are contemplating this procedure.

Hearing eyeball and/or eyelid movements on the side of a unilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Hearing of eyeball movements has been reported in superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), but not hearing of eyelid movements. Our main objective was to report the hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements in unilateral SSCD. Our secondary objective was to access its specificity to SSCD and discuss the underlying mechanism. Six patients with SSCD who could hear their eyeball and/or eyelid movements were retrospectively reviewed. With the aim of comparisons, eight patients with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), who share the same mechanism of an abnormal third window, were questioned on their ability to hear their eyeball and/or eyelid movements. Three patients with SSCD could hear both their eyeball and eyelid movements as a soft low-pitch friction sound. Two patients with SSCD could hear only their eyelid movements, one of whom after the surgery of a traumatic chronic subdural hematoma. The latter remarked that every gently tapping on the skin covering the burr-hole was heard in his dehiscent ear as the sound produced when banging on a drum, in keeping with a direct transmission of the sound to the inner ear via the cerebrospinal fluid. One patient with SSCD, who could hear only his eyeball movements, had other disabling symptoms deserving operation through a middle fossa approach with an immediate relief of his symptoms. None of the eight patients with EVA could hear his/her eyeball or eyelid movements. Hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements is highly suggestive of a SSCD and do not seem to occur in EVA. In case of radiological SSCD, clinicians should search for hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements providing arguments for a symptomatic dehiscence. The underlying mechanism is discussed particularly the role of a cerebrospinal fluid transmission.

Evidence of Osteoclastic Activity in the Human Temporal Bone.

Bone remodeling within the otic capsule has been reported to be inhibited especially at or near the cochlea, except under some pathological conditions such as otosclerosis, Paget's disease, or mastoiditis, when bone remodeling can occur. Microcavitations found in periosteal and endosteal layers of human temporal bone specimens without otosclerosis, Paget's disease, or inflammation as reported in the current study are consistent with osteoclastic bone resorption. Thirty-three temporal bones from 33 patients were prepared for light microscopy and classified into 4 groups: histologically proven dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal (SSCD) (n = 3, group 1), age 20 years or younger (n = 10, group 2), age 90 years or older and with otosclerosis (n = 10, group 3), and age 90 years or older without otosclerosis (n = 10, group 4). Microcavitation was seen at 7 anatomic locations in the temporal bone in all 4 groups, but not in the cochlea or vestibule. Microcavitation within the temporal bone is likely due to osteoclastic activity, and it is seen in both young and old patients, patients with and without otosclerosis, and in cases with SSCD.

A Rare Case of Angiofibroma Presenting as an Endolymphatic Sac Tumor.

A 30-year-old man presented with minute-long episodes of vertigo and severe autophony. CVEMP showed a decreased threshold when testing the left side, potentially indicating SSCD. A subsequent MRI demonstrated a multi-lobulated, cystic mass in the temporal bone and the radiological diagnosis at that time was ELST. Tumor excision was performed, and microscopic examination of the excised material revealed fibrovascular tissue without signs of papillary or cystic projections. The conclusion of the histological assessment rendered a diagnosis of angiofibroma. We were unable to find a previous report of ENA originating around the endolymphatic sac. Laryngoscope, 134:1897-1900, 2024.

First-Side and Second-Side Repair of Bilateral Superior Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) may warrant surgeries on both sides. With repairs of unilateral SCD as reference, we investigate the comparative effectiveness of first-side and second-side repairs, in hopes of establishing knowledge that can guide clinical decision-making pertaining the appropriateness of second-side surgeries. METHODS: Middle fossa SCD repairs at an institution between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. Multivariable regression models assessed symptom resolution and audiometric improvement with surgery cohort (unilateral SCD repair vs. first-side repair vs. second-side repair) as the primary predictor. All models controlled for patient age, sex, surgery duration, prior ear surgery, and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 407 repairs (180 unilateral SCD, 172 first-side, and 55 second-side repairs) were analyzed. The rates of overall symptom improvement for auditory and vestibular symptoms were as follows: 81% and 67% for unilateral SCD repairs; 73% and 54% for first-side repairs; and 43% and 51% for second-side repairs, respectively. Compared with first-side repairs, which resolved auditory symptoms at similar rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.36-1.07) but resolved vestibular symptoms at significantly lower rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.35-0.93) compared with unilateral SCD repairs, second-side repairs resolved auditory symptoms at significantly lower rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.10-0.51) but resolved vestibular symptoms at similar rates (aOR 95% C.I. 0.45-2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of perioperative symptomatology may inform the appropriateness of second-side surgeries. If auditory symptoms persisted following first-side surgeries, second-side surgeries are less likely to yield resolution. If vestibular symptoms persisted following first-side repairs, second-side repairs may lead to resolution at similar rates as first-side repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1882-1888, 2024.

Comparing Approaches for Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: Compare outcomes for subjects who underwent middle cranial fossa (MCF) or transmastoid (TM) repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary-care, academic neurotology practice. METHODS: Subjects who underwent MCF or TM repair of SSCD between December 1999 and April 2023 were identified. Main outcome measures included demographic data, length of surgery and hospital stay, clinical presentation, and audiometric testing. RESULTS: Ninety-three subjects (97 ears) who underwent surgery for SSCD met inclusion criteria: 58.8% (57) via MCF, 39.2% (38) via TM, and 2.0% (2) via TM + MCF. Median operative time was shorter for the TM (35) compared to the MCF (29) approach (118 vs 151 minutes, P < .001). Additionally, median hospital stays were shorter for TM (36) compared to the MCF (56) approach (15.3 vs 67.7 hours, P < .001). Overall, 92% (49/53) of MCF and 92% (33/36) of TM surgeries resulted in an improvement or resolution of one or more symptoms (P = .84). There was no significant preoperative to postoperative change in the median air conduction pure-tone average (PTA), air-bone gap, or word recognition score in both the MCF and TM groups (P > .05). Improvements of >10 dB in the pre- to postoperative absolute change in bone conduction PTA were noted in 3 subjects in the MCF group and 4 subjects in the TM group (P = .49). CONCLUSION: The TM approach for SSCD demonstrates shorter operative times and length of hospital stay. The TM and MCF approaches have comparable audiometric and clinical outcomes.