Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and VITEK 2 against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-E4 reference broth microdilution method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii.

The present study collected 280 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans and 22 isolates of Cryptococcus gattii and evaluated the consistencies between Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), VITEK 2, and the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. For amphotericin B, SYO was replaced with the BIO KONT amphotericin B microbroth dilution kit. The essential agreements (EAs) by SYO and VITEK 2 for C. neoformans var. grubii and C. neoformans var. neoformans were 98.15-99.63% and 88.89-100%, respectively, with fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. The EA for C. gattii VG â…  against fluconazole was 29.41% by VITEK 2, while the other EAs for C. gattii strains were 100% by SYO and VITEK 2. The categorical agreements (CAs) by SYO and VITEK 2 for C. neoformans and C. gattii were 94.12-100%, while VITEK 2 failed to distinguish 5/6 fluconazole-resistant non-wild-type C. neoformans var. grubii isolates; this finding confirmed the limitation of testing fluconazole against C. neoformans as documented in the manufacturer's package insert. The EAs for amphotericin B were 97.42-100% for C. neoformans and C. gattii, but the CAs were 17.65-60% by BIO KONT and VITEK 2. Thus, SYO can be used for susceptibility testing of C. neoformans and C. gattii against fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine, and VITEK 2 can be used for susceptibility testing of C. neoformans against voriconazole and flucytosine. Further studies using amphotericin B-resistant isolates are required to assess the agreement between VITEK 2, BIO KONT, and BMD. LAY SUMMARY: Sensititre YeastOne showed a good agreement with the CLSI broth microdilution method for C. neoformans and C. gattii against voriconazole and flucytosine. The limitation regarding fluconazole testing against C. neoformans documented in VITEK 2 manufacturer's package insert was confirmed.

Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne® and CLSI M38-A2 microdilution methods in determining the activity of nine antifungal agents against dermatophytes.

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytes are the most common fungal pathogens causing superficial infections in humans with a high prevalence worldwide. The treatment of these infections is based on the use of topical and systemic antifungal agents. A convenient method with a high predictive value for testing the susceptibilities of dermatophytes is necessary. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the Sensititre YeastOne® in testing the activity of nine antifungal agents against dermatophytes. METHODS: We compared Sensititre® with reference procedure for anidulafungin (ANID), micafungin sodium (MCF), caspofungin acetate (CAS), 5-fluorocytosine (5FC), posaconazole (PCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), itraconazole (ITZ), fluconazole (FLZ) and amphotericin B (AMB) against 79 dermatophyte isolates, the essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between the two methods were obtained. RESULTS: The MICs or MECs obtained by the Sensititre® were usually lower than those obtained by the M38-A2. The overall EA between the two methods of nine antifungals was best for 5FC (100%), followed by MCF (94.9%), PCZ (84.8%), AMB (67.1%), FLZ (65.8%), VCZ (63.3%), ANID (29.1%), ITZ (20.3%) and CAS (2.5%). The overall CA between the two methods for all drugs was 100% except for ANID (97.4%), MCF (95%) and PCZ (92.5%). Substantial discrepancies were observed with all drugs except for VCZ and 5FC. The results of M38-A2 in terms of GMIC (or GMEC) and MIC90 (or MEC90) were, in increasing order, as follows: MCF, PCZ, VCZ, ANID, ITZ, CAS, AMB, FLZ and 5FC. CONCLUSIONS: The Sensititre YeastOne® shows poor EA with the reference method for dermatophytes; therefore, M38-A2 should remain the reference procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing against dermatophytes.

Evaluation of Two Commercial Broth Microdilution Methods Using Different Interpretive Criteria for the Detection of Molecular Mechanisms of Acquired Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Four Common Candida Species.

The abilities of the new Vitek 2 AST-YS08 (YS08) and Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) systems to detect the resistances of Candida isolates to azoles and echinocandins were evaluated. In total, 292 isolates, including 28 Candida albicans (6 Erg11 and 2 Fks mutants), 57 Candida parapsilosis (26 Erg11 mutants), 24 Candida tropicalis (10 Erg11 and 1 Fks mutants), and 183 Candida glabrata (39 Pdr1 and 13 Fks mutants) isolates, were tested. The categorical agreements (CAs) between the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and YS08 fluconazole MICs obtained using clinical breakpoints were 92.4% (C. albicans), 96.5% (C. parapsilosis), and 87.0% (C. tropicalis), and the CAs between the CLSI and SYO MICs were 92.3% (C. albicans), 77.2% (C. parapsilosis), 100% (C. tropicalis), and 98.9% (C. glabrata). For C. glabrata, the CAs with the CLSI micafungin MICs were 92.4% and 55.5% for the YS08 micafungin and caspofungin MICs, respectively; they were 100%, 95.6%, and 98.9% for the SYO micafungin, caspofungin, and anidulafungin MICs, respectively. YS08 does not provide fluconazole data for C. glabrata; the CA with the CLSI fluconazole MIC was 97.8% for the YS08 voriconazole MIC, using an epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) of 0.5 µg/ml. Increased CAs with the CLSI MIC were observed for the YS08 MIC using CLSI ECVs (for fluconazole and C. tropicalis, 100%; for micafungin and C. glabrata, 98.9%) and for the SYO MIC using method-specific ECVs (for fluconazole and C. parapsilosis, 91.2%; for caspofungin and C. glabrata, 98.9%). Therefore, the YS08 and SYO systems may have different abilities to detect mechanisms of azole and echinocandin resistance in four Candida species; the use of method-specific ECVs may improve the performance of both systems.

Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans.

We compared MIC test strip (MTS) and Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) methods with EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, 5-fluocytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole against 106 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. The overall essential agreement between the EUCAST and CLSI methods was >72% and >94% at ±1 and ±2 dilutions, respectively. The essential agreements between SYO and EUCAST/CLSI for amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, and voriconazole were >89/>93% and between MTS and EUCAST/CLSI were >57/>75%. Very major error rates were low for amphotericin B and fluconazole (<3%) and a bit higher for the other drugs (<8%).

Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne antifungal method with the CLSI M27-A3 reference method to determine the activity of antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Candidaspp.

Background and aim: Infections caused by Candida species are significantly increasing today, and invasive Candida infections are generally associated with high mortality. Early diagnosis and identification of Candida spp. is important for the determination of antifungal agents that will be used for treatment. The aim of the present study was to provide a better regimen for Candida infections in the future. Materials and methods: TheSensititre YeastOne (SYO) method was compared with The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) testing method. Endpoints of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for both methods. Results: By using both methods, MIC values of micafungin, caspofungin, voriconazole, and fluconazole were lower than amphotericin B. The values obtained with the SYO method were in high categorical agreement for ecinocandins and amphotericin B. The results of voriconazole and fluconazole were in low categorical agreement. The categorical agreement between the SYO and the BMD results at 24 h was 82.1% for VORI and 98.4% for AMB. Values obtained with SYO method for all antifungal agents were in high essential agreement with the data of the CLSI reference BMD method. The essential agreement between the SYO and the BMD results at 24 h was 94.0% for MFG and 99.0% for AMB. Conclusions: The SYO method was ready-to use, so it appeared to be easier and more efficient for Candida isolates.

Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-A2 Microdilution Methods in Determining the Activity of Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, and Posaconazole against Aspergillus Species.

This study compared the YeastOne and reference CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species. The MICs of antifungal agents were determined for 100 Aspergillus isolates, including 54 Aspergillus fumigatus (24 TR34/L98H isolates), 23 A. flavus, 13 A. terreus, and 10 A. niger isolates. The overall agreement (within 2 2-fold dilutions) between the two methods was 100%, 95%, 92%, and 90% for voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B, respectively. The voriconazole geometric mean (GM) MICs were nearly identical for all isolates using both methods, whereas the itraconazole and posaconazole GM MICs obtained using the YeastOne method were approximately 1 dilution lower than those obtained using the reference method. In contrast, the amphotericin B GM MIC obtained using the YeastOne method was 3.3-fold higher than that observed using the reference method. For the 24 A. fumigatus TR34/L98H isolates assayed, the categorical agreement (classified according to the CLSI epidemiological cutoff values) was 100%, 87.5%, and 83.3% for itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively. For four A. niger isolates, the itraconazole MICs were >8 µg/ml using the M38-A2 method due to trailing growth, whereas the corresponding itraconazole MICs obtained using the YeastOne method were all ≤0.25 µg/ml without trailing growth. These data suggest that the YeastOne method can be used as an alternative for azole susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species and for detecting the A. fumigatus TR34/L98H isolates but that this method fails to detect A. niger isolates exhibiting trailing growth with itraconazole. Additionally, for isolates with azole MICs that approach or that are at susceptibility breakpoints or with high amphotericin B MICs detected using the YeastOne method, further MIC confirmation using the reference CLSI method is needed.

Susceptibility profile of echinocandins, azoles and amphotericin B against yeast phase of Talaromyces marneffei isolated from HIV-infected patients in Guangdong, China.

Talaromyces marneffei (T. marneffei) can cause talaromycosis, a fatal systemic mycosis, in patients with AIDS. With the increasing number of talaromycosis cases in Guangdong, China, we aimed to investigate the susceptibility of 189 T. marneffei clinical strains to eight antifungal agents, including three echinocandins (anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin), four azoles (posaconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and fluconazole), and amphotericin B, with determining minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC) by Sensititre YeastOne™ YO10 assay in the yeast phase. The MICs of anidulafungin, micafungin, caspofungin, posaconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, fluconazole, and amphotericin B were 2 to > 8 µg/ml, >8 µg/ml, 2 to > 8 µg/ml, ≤ 0.008 to 0.06 µg/ml, ≤ 0.015 to 0.03 µg/ml, ≤ 0.008 to 0.06 µg/ml, 1 to 32 µg/ml, and ≤ 0.12 to 1 µg/ml, respectively. The MICs of all echinocandins were very high, while the MICs of posaconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole, as well as amphotericin B were comparatively low. Notably, fluconazole was found to have a higher MIC than other azoles, and exhibited particularly weak activity against some isolates with MICs over 8 µg/ml. Our data in vitro support the use of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole in management of talaromycosis and suggest potential resistance to fluconazole.

Etest and Sensititre YeastOne Susceptibility Testing of Echinocandins against Candida Species from a Single Center in Austria.

Candida species were tested for susceptibility to caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin in order to evaluate the roles of Etest and Sensititre YeastOne in antifungal susceptibility testing for daily routines and to survey resistance. A total of 104 Candida species isolates detected from blood cultures were investigated. With EUCAST broth microdilution as the reference method, essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor (MIN) errors were assessed by reading MICs at 18, 24, and 48 h. By use of EUCAST broth microdilution and species-specific clinical breakpoints (CBPs), echinocandin resistance was not detected during the study period. Using EUCAST CBPs, MIC readings at 24 h for the Etest and Sensititre YeastOne resulted in CA levels of 99% and 93% for anidulafungin and 99% and 97% for micafungin. Using revised CLSI CBPs for caspofungin, CA levels were 92% and 99% for Etest and Sensititre YeastOne. The Etest proved an excellent, easy-to-handle alternative method for testing susceptibility to anidulafungin and micafungin. Due to misclassifications, the Etest is less suitable for testing susceptibility to caspofungin (8% of isolates falsely tested resistant). The CA levels of Sensititre YeastOne were 93% and 97% for anidulafungin and micafungin (24 h) by use of EUCAST CBPs and increased to 100% for both antifungals if CLSI CBPs were applied and to 100% and 99% if Sensititre YeastOne epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were applied. No one echinocandin could be demonstrated to be superior to another in vitro Since resistance was lacking among our Candida isolates, we cannot derive any recommendation from accurate resistance detection by the Etest and Sensititre YeastOne.

Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against Aspergillus isolates.

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against Aspergillus spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of Aspergillus spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against Aspergillus isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against Aspergillus isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with Aspergillus infections.

Candida auris - Comparison of sensititre YeastOne and Vitek 2 AST systems for antifungal susceptibility testing - A single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Candida auris is emerging as an important cause of candidemia and deep seated candidal infection. We compared the susceptibility results of bloodstream Candida auris isolates by Vitek 2 with Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) method. METHODS: Forty-seven C. auris blood stream isolates were simultaneously tested for AFST by Vitek 2 and SYO. RESULTS: All strains were resistant to Fluconazole. 25.5% isolates showed pan-azole resistance. In comparison with SYO, lower MICs for voriconazole were noted with Vitek 2 (VME rate 76.1%). All strains were sensitive to anidulafungin and micafungin by SYO. For micafungin, Vitek 2 demonstrated higher MICs and an ME rate of 23.5%. Susceptibility interpretation of caspofungin by SYO was challenged by development of 'Eagle effect' resulting in sensitivity of 28.2%. We studied the evolution of caspofungin 'Eagle effect' with SYO by serial hourly MIC readings and noted that paradoxical growth commenced at 21 hrs of incubation. Compared to SYO, Vitek 2 showed higher resistance rate to Amphotericin B with ME rate of 25.6%. CONCLUSION: Laboratories using commercial AFST systems for Candida auris need to be aware of the possibility of ME and VME for amphotericin B and voriconazole respectively with Vitek 2 and 'Eagle effect' for caspofungin with SYO.

Comparative study of antifungal susceptibility testing methods for clinical Candida albicans isolates.

PURPOSE: Candida albicans is the second most common cause of candidemia in Malaysia. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method is the gold standard for determining its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); however, it is laborious and time-consuming. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of alternative methods, namely Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), VITEK 2 system, and E-test for determining the MIC of clinical C. albicans isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The susceptibilities of 95 C. albicans isolates were compared between SYO, VITEK 2 system, and E-test with CLSI broth microdilution method. The categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (MiE) were calculated. RESULTS: Our finding showed the CA varied for SYO from 96.8% to 100%, while the EA ranged from 91.6% to 100%. The SYO method showed 1.1% of VME and ME, and up to 3.2% of MiE. Next, the CA and EA ranges for the VITEK 2 system were 97.8%-100% and 23.2%-100%, respectively. In the VITEK 2 technique, 1.1% of VME were found. For the E-test, the CA varied from 83.2% to 100% while the EA ranged from 64.2% to 98.9%. The E-test method showed 1.1% of VME and up to 16.8% of MiE. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SYO and VITEK 2 (except flucytosine) could be potential alternatives to the CLSI broth microdilution method in determining the MIC of C. albicans.

Comparative assessment of Sensititre YeastOne and Micronaut-AM EUCAST for antifungal susceptibility testing in candidaemia isolates.

PURPOSE: Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is essential to ensure appropriate antifungal therapy in candidaemia. This study compared two commercial colorimetric broth microdilution tests: Sensititre YeastOne (SYO; Thermo Scientific) and Micronaut-AM EUCAST AFST (M-AM; Bruker) for the AFST of Candida spp. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 74 yeast strains, including C. albicans (n = 40) and non-albicans Candida species (NACS) (n = 34), were obtained from blood cultures of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Belgium from 2017 to 2022. AFST by SYO and by M-AM were performed according to the manufacturers' protocols and interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST guidelines, respectively. Essential and categorical agreements (EA and CA), very major, major and minor discrepancies were calculated for amphotericin B, echinocandins and azoles considering SYO as the reference method. RESULTS: In total, 441 and 392 isolate-antifungal results were evaluable for EA and CA, respectively. SYO and M-AM, showed a high level of concordance for C. albicans strains, with an EA and CA ≥90 % for all tested antifungals. However, we noted significant discordances for NACS, the lowest EA were observed with micafungin (50 %) and voriconazole (58.8 %). These discrepancies were likely due to differences in the raw MIC values obtained by the two methods and the different interpretation breakpoints used by CLSI and EUCAST. CONCLUSION: Our study showed excellent agreement between SYO and M-AM for AFST of C. albicans, while the equivalency was lower for NACS. AFST method should be carefully selected, considering the results might impact the choice of antifungals for non-albicans candidaemia.

Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Saprophytic Molds: Can They Be Used to Detect Resistance?

Commercial tests are often employed in clinical microbiology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been defined in order to detect non-wild-type (NWT) isolates harboring resistance mechanisms. We reviewed the literature in order to find studies where commercial methods were used to evaluate for in vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungi and assess their ability to detect NWT isolates according to the available ECVs. Data were found for the gradient concentration strips Etest and MIC Test Strips (MTS), broth microdilution Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), Micronaut-AM and the agar dilution VIPcheck assays. Applying itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole Etest ECVs for A. fumigatus, Etest was able to detect 90.3% (84/93), 61.2% (90/147) and 86% (31/36) of isolates with known cyp51A mutations, respectively. Moreover, Etest also was able to detect 3/3 fks mutants using caspofungin ECVs and 2/3 micafungin mutant isolates. Applying the voriconazole and posaconazole SYO ECVs, 57.7% (67/116) and 100% (47/47) of mutants with known cyp51A substitutions were classified as NWT, respectively. VIPcheck detected 90.3% (159/176), 80.1% (141/176) and 66% (141/176)of mutants via itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively, whereas Micronaut-AM detected 88% (22/25). In conclusion, Etest posaconazole and itraconazole, as well as micafungin and caspofungin ECVs, detected A. fumigatus mutants. On the other hand, while the posaconazole SYO ECV was able to detect cyp51A mutants, similar data were not observed with the SYO voriconazole ECV.

Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance in Candida auris with Sensititre YeastOne Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: a Need for Adjustment for Correct Interpretation.

Significant variation in minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) has been reported for amphotericin B (AMB) and C. auris, depending on the antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) method. Although the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) is widely used in routine laboratory testing, data regarding its performance for the AFST of C. auris are scarce. We tested AMB against 65 C. auris clinical isolates with the SYO and the reference methodology by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The essential agreement (EA, ±1 dilution) between the two methods and the categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s tentative breakpoint of MIC ≥ 2 mg/L were determined. The SYO wild type upper limit value (WT-UL) was determined using the ECOFFinder. The modal (range) CLSI growth inhibitory MIC was lower than the SYO colorimetric MIC [1(0.25-1) versus 2(1-8) mg/L, respectively]). The CLSI-colorimetric SYO EA was 29% and the CA was 11% (89% major errors; MaE). MaE were reduced when the SYO WT-UL of 8 mg/L was used (0% MaE). Alternatively, the use of SYO growth inhibition endpoints of MIC-1 (75% growth inhibition) or MIC-2 (50% growth inhibition) resulted in 88% CA with 12% MaE and 97% CA with 3% MaE, respectively. In conclusion, SYO overestimated AMB resistance in C. auris isolates when colorimetric MICs, as per SYO instructions and the CDC breakpoint of 2 mg/L, were used. This can be improved either by using the method-specific WT-UL MIC of 8 mg/L for colorimetric MICs or by determining growth inhibition MIC endpoints, regardless of the color. IMPORTANCE Candida auris is an emerging and frequently multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that accounts for life-threatening invasive infections and nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. Reliable AF is important for the choice of the optimal treatment. Commercial methods are frequently used without prior vigorous assessment. Resistance to AMB was over-reported with the commercial colorimetric method Sensititre YeastOne (SYO). SYO produced MICs that were 1 to 2 twofold dilutions higher than those of the reference CLSI method, resulting in 89% MaE. MaE were reduced using a SYO-specific colorimetric wild type upper limit MIC value of 8 mg/L (0%) or a 50% growth inhibition endpoint (3%).

Rapid automated antifungal susceptibility testing system for yeasts based on growth characteristics.

Fungal pathogens are a major threat to public health, as they are becoming increasingly common and resistant to treatment, with only four classes of antifungal medicines currently available and few candidates in the clinical development pipeline. Most fungal pathogens lack rapid and sensitive diagnostic techniques, and those that exist are not widely available or affordable. In this study, we introduce a novel automated antifungal susceptibility testing system, Droplet 48, which detects the fluorescence of microdilution wells in real time and fits growth characteristics using fluorescence intensity over time. We concluded that all reportable ranges of Droplet 48 were appropriate for clinical fungal isolates in China. Reproducibility within ±2 two-fold dilutions was 100%. Considering the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Broth method as a comparator method, eight antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine) showed an essential agreement of >90%, except for posaconazole (86.62%). Category agreement of four antifungal agents (fluconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) was >90%, except for voriconazole (87.93% agreement). Two Candida albicans isolates and anidulafungin showed a major discrepancy (MD) (2.60%), and no other MD or very MD agents were found. Therefore, Droplet 48 can be considered as an optional method that is more automated and can obtain results and interpretations faster than previous methods. However, the optimization of the detection performance of posaconazole and voriconazole and promotion of Droplet 48 in clinical microbiology laboratories still require further research involving more clinical isolates in the future.

Evaluation of a custom Sensititre YeastOne plate for susceptibility testing of isavuconazole and other antifungals against clinically relevant yeast and mould species in three Australian diagnostic mycology laboratories.

This study aimed to validate the performance of the custom formulated Sensititre YeastOne One (SYO) microdilution plate which includes isavuconazole (AUSNMRC1) to perform susceptibility testing on clinically relevant yeast and mould species across three Australian reference laboratories. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results were compared with the IVD approved SYO YO10 microdilution plate and isavuconazole gradient strips. A total of 127 isolates were tested on both the YO10 and AUSNMRC1 plates. The overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) for the eight common drugs was 99.9% and 98.8%, respectively. The EA was 96.9% for the isavuconazole MICs obtained using the AUSNMRC1 plate and gradient strip. The MIC results for all nine antifungals on the AUSNMRC1 panel were highly reproducible for all quality control and reference strains and the overall EA and CA for 45 clinical strains tested across all three participating laboratories were >93% and 94.1%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the SYO AUSNMRC1 plate provides a commercial means to determine isavuconazole MICs by broth microdilution testing.

Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne and Etest in Comparison with CLSI M38-A2 for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Three Azoles, Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, and Anidulafungin, against Aspergillusfumigatus and Other Species, Using New Clinical Breakpoints and Epidemiological Cutoff Values.

Aspergillosis is an invasive fungal disease associated with high mortality. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is receiving increasing consideration for managing patients, as well as for surveilling emerging drug resistance, despite having time-consuming and technically complex reference methodologies. The Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) and Etest methods are widely utilized for yeasts but have not been extensively evaluated for Aspergillus isolates. We obtained Posaconazole (POS), Voriconazole (VCZ), Itraconazole (ITC), Amphotericin B (AMB), Caspofungin (CAS), and Anidulafungin (AND) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for both the Etest (n = 330) and SYO (n = 339) methods for 106 sequenced clinical strains. For 84 A. fumigatus, we analyzed the performance of both commercial methods in comparison with the CLSI-AFST, using available cutoff values. An excellent correlation could be demonstrated for Etest-AMB and Etest-VCZ (p < 0.01). SYO-MICs of AMB, VCZ, and POS resulted in excellent essential agreement (>93%), and >80% for AMB, VCZ, and ITC Etest-MICs. High categoric agreement was found for AMB, ITC, and CAS Etest-MICs (>85%) and AMB SYO-MICs (>90%). The considerable number of major/very major errors found using Etest and SYO, possibly related to the proposed cutoffs and associated with the less time-consuming processes, support the need for the improvement of commercial methods for Aspergillus strains.

Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for Candida Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM.

Two colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical Candida isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice. The reproducibility characteristics were comparable. Only for fluconazole, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine and amphotericin B, an essential agreement of ≥90% could be demonstrated. Sensititre minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were systematically higher than MICRONAUT MICs for all antifungals, except for itraconazole. CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) were used for Sensititre MICs while for MICRONAUT the EUCAST CBPs and ECVs were used. Only fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B had a categorical agreement of ≥90%. For fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B the susceptibility proportions were comparable. Susceptibility proportion of posaconazole and voriconazole was higher using the MICRONAUT system. For itraconazole and anidulafungin, the susceptibility proportion was higher using Sensititre. It was not possible to determine the true MIC values or the correctness of a S/I/R result since both commercial systems were validated against a different reference method. These findings show that there is a significant variability in susceptibility pattern and consequently on use of antifungals in daily practice, depending on the choice of commercial system.

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing and Identification.

The requirement for antifungal susceptibility testing is increasing given the availability of new drugs, increasing populations of individuals at risk for fungal infection, and emerging multiresistant fungi. Rapid and accurate fungal identification remains at the forefront of laboratory efforts to guide empiric therapy. Antifungal susceptibility testing methods have greatly improved, but are subject to variation in results between methods. Careful standardization, validation, and extensive training of users is essential to ensure susceptibility results are clinically useful and interpreted appropriately. Interpretive criteria for many drugs and species are still lacking, but this will continue to evolve.

Antifungal susceptibility of clinical isolates of 25 genetically confirmed Aspergillus species collected from Taiwan and Mainland China.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of 25 genetically confirmed Aspergillus species collected from Taiwan and Mainland China. METHODS: A total of 390 non-duplicate and consecutive Aspergillus isolates representing of 25 species recovered from clinical sources at two teaching hospitals in Taiwan and Mainland china were preserved for this study. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of those Aspergillus isolates against seven antifungal agents was performed using Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) system. The susceptibility profiles of isolates were analyzed according to the general interpretation code drawn from the SYO instruction. The CYP51A gene sequencing analysis was performed for triazole-resistant Aspergillusfumigatus isolates. RESULTS: Among the 390 Aspergillus isolates, 76.7% (n = 299) exhibited complete susceptibility to all the tested antifungals, and 23.3% (91/390) of different Aspergillus species isolates showed resistance to one or two classes of antifungal agents with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of >2 mg/L. Resistance to amphotericin B was found in 91.2% (83/91) of those less susceptible isolates and most of them focused on species being resistant to Amphotericin B innately. The total rate of triazole resistance in this study was low (3.3%, 13/390), and only 3 (2.8%) A. fumigatus isolates were resistant to at least one of the triazoles with mutations of TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A in CYP51A gene. The echinocandins were highly potent to the tested Aspergillus isolates. CONCLUSION: The existence of triazole resistance among A. fumigatus isolates in Taiwan and Mainland China indicates the need for continuous monitoring from now on.