Cardiac shockwave therapy in addition to coronary bypass surgery improves myocardial function in ischaemic heart failure: the CAST-HF trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In chronic ischaemic heart failure, revascularisation strategies control symptoms but are less effective in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of this trial is to investigate the safety of cardiac shockwave therapy (SWT) as a novel treatment option and its efficacy in increasing cardiac function by inducing angiogenesis and regeneration in hibernating myocardium. METHODS: In this single-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial (cardiac shockwave therapy for ischemic heart failure, CAST-HF; NCT03859466) patients with LVEF ≤40% requiring surgical revascularisation were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo direct cardiac SWT or sham treatment in addition to coronary bypass surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the improvement in LVEF measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging from baseline to 360 days. RESULTS: Overall, 63 patients were randomized, out of which 30 patients of the SWT group and 28 patients of the Sham group attained 1-year follow-up of the primary endpoint. Greater improvement in LVEF was observed in the SWT group (Δ from baseline to 360 days: SWT 11.3%, SD 8.8; Sham 6.3%, SD 7.4, P = .0146). Secondary endpoints included the 6-minute walking test, where patients randomized in the SWT group showed a greater Δ from baseline to 360 days (127.5 m, SD 110.6) than patients in the Sham group (43.6 m, SD 172.1) (P = .028) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score on day 360, which was 11.0 points (SD 19.1) for the SWT group and 17.3 points (SD 15.1) for the Sham group (P = .15). Two patients in the treatment group died for non-device-related reasons. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the CAST-HF trial indicates that direct cardiac SWT, in addition to coronary bypass surgery improves LVEF and physical capacity in patients with ischaemic heart failure.

The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) remain the most challenging group in terms of available noninvasive treatment modalities. AIM: The study sought to assess the role of combination therapy with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) and daily tadalafil 5 mg in a highly select group of patients with severe vasculogenic ED through a double-blind, randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-eight sexually active men were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of LiST 3 times weekly and tadalafil 5 mg once daily (n = 34) or sham therapy and tadalafil (n = 17) for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed at 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. OUTCOMES: Improvement of erectile function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) or 6-item IIEF and the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised (1) the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 1 month after completion of treatment, (2) the difference between the groups in the "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary at 1 and 3 months, and (3) the treatment-related adverse events. The number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF (improvement of at least 7 points) was also assessed. RESULTS: After treatment, the absolute scores in the IIEF-EF were higher in patients receiving LiST and tadalafil vs sham therapy and tadalafil both at the 1-month (12.1 ± 2.4 vs 10.2 ± 1.7; P = .002) and at the 3-month (12.9 ± 2.1 vs 10.8 ± 1.8; P < .001) evaluation. Between the 2 groups, the proportion of "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary was not statistically significant, whereas the number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF was statistically significant only at the 3-month evaluation. No adverse events occurred. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Application of LiST in patients with severe vasculogenic ED receiving daily dose tadalafil may further improve erectile function compared with tadalafil as a stand-alone treatment on the short term. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Although we provided the first study in the field, severe vasculogenic ED was defined based on medical history and clinical examination and not based on penile ultrasound measures. CONCLUSION: The combination of 12 sessions LiST 3 times weekly and daily tadalafil for 4 weeks led to a 2-point difference in the IIEF-EF compared with sham therapy and daily tadalafil among patients with severe vasculogenic ED after 1 and 3 months from completion of treatment.

Laser tattoo removal strategies: Part II: A review of the methods, techniques, and complications involved in tattoo removal.

The rising global popularity of cosmetic and corrective tattoos has concurrently led to an increased demand for their removal. While in the past, methods like surgical excision, chemical destruction, and dermabrasion were employed, lasers have emerged as a reliable and effective tool for tattoo removal. Increasing technological options and combination treatment strategies have raised the importance of understanding the various approaches to laser tattoo removal along with their respective clinical impact. This CME aims to describe the multifaceted aspects of laser tattoo removal, including the method selection, application principles, and safety considerations. Furthermore, it addresses the factors considered when selecting the most suitable laser to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

AIMS: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) prevalence varies from 8.4% to 25% of the male population and is associated with diminished health-related quality of life. Managing CP/CPPS remains challenging and there is not any common option to treat all patients effectively because of the complex disease nature. The currently available data for the extracorporeal shockwave therapy (eSWT) effect on pain relief and well-being were analyzed in the present study. METHODS: We adhered to PRISMA 2022 guidelines for reporting the quantitative and qualitative data synthesis. A literature search was conducted in March 2023 using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Randomized prospective studies of eSWT alone or eSWT plus conventional medicinal treatment were included. The risk of bias was estimated using the RoB 2.0. Primary outcomes were self-reported scores, including the NIH-CPSI questionnaire and VAS, at 1 month or 2, 3, and 6, months follow-up. RESULTS: The CP/CPPS patients who receive eSWT have more pronounced pain relief and improvement of other subjective NIH-CPSI scores compared with control groups that received placebo or medication therapy. The effect of eSWT seems to be long-lasting and was confirmed in the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the meta-analysis of accessible studies, we receive the equivalence eSWT applicability for the CP/CPPS treatment and can be offered to patients because of its noninvasiveness, high level of safety, and successful clinical results demonstrated in this analysis.

The Effects of Shock Wave Therapy on the Symptoms and Function of Individuals With Dupuytren Disease: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain, clinical and functional outcomes, and satisfaction of patients with Dupuytren disease. DATA SOURCES: A thorough search for all the study types published in English was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to August 31, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Title and abstract and then full-text screening against eligibility criteria was performed independently by 2 reviewers, and a third reviewer achieved consensus. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers identified 26 studies, of which 6 were included in the analysis (145 cases). The methodological quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Assessments represented a remarkable improvement in the pain and function through the measurements including the visual analog scale, the Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, and Mayo Wrist Score. Patients' satisfaction was also favorable using the Roles and Maudsley score. The hand grip strength improvement was noted in one study measured via a Jamar dynamometer. In addition, the ultrasonographic assessment of the nodules revealed a decrease in the size of the nodules in a patient with multiple bilateral nodules after the treatment. The quality of the included studies was good for all studies except for one that was fair. The certainty of evidence was moderate for pain and function and was low for patients' satisfaction and ultrasonographic findings. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT can lead to significant pain improvement, functional rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction with no adverse effect in the management of Dupuytren disease. Pain may return over time, but not to that severity before the intervention. ESWT-related characteristics and the need for continuation of treatment remain to be fully elucidated in future large clinical trials.

Optimizing targeting strategies for lithotripsy through in-vitro and in vivo studies with consideration of respiratory regularity.

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to identify a method to achieve improved stone targeting and safety in shockwave lithotripsy by accounting for respiration. METHODS: We set up an electromotive device simulating renal movement during respiration to place artificial stones within the phantom gel, measuring stone weight changes before and after shockwave exposure and the cavitation damage. We conducted clinical trials using respiratory masks and sensors to monitor and analyze patient respiration during shockwave lithotripsy. RESULTS: The in vitro efficiency of lithotripsy was higher when adjusted for respiration than when respiration was not adjusted for. Slow respiration showed the best efficiency with higher hit rates when not adjusted for respiration. Cavitation damage was also lowest during slow respiration. The clinical study included 52 patients. Respiratory regularity was maintained above 90% in regular respiration. When respiration was regular, the lithotripsy rate was about 65.6%, which stayed at about 40% when respiration was irregular. During the lithotripsy, the participants experienced various events, such as sleep, taking off their masks, talking, movement, coughing, pain, nervousness, and hyperventilation. The generation of shockwaves based on respiratory regularity could reduce pain in patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a more accurate lithotripsy should be performed according to respiratory regularity.

Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. DESIGN: Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups. SETTING: The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study. INTERVENTION: The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; p < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; p < 0.01) than in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Therapeutic implications of extracorporeal shock waves in burn wound healing.

Burns are a common type of trauma that seriously affect not only the physical health, but also the mental health and quality of life of the patient. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an emerging treatment that has been used in clinical treatment. It has many advantages, including safety, non-invasiveness, efficiency, short treatment duration, fewer complications, and relatively low prices. In clinical settings, ESWT has played an important role in the healing process of burns and the prevention of sequelae. This article reviews the history of ESWT, the mechanism of ESWT to promote burn healing, and the application of ESWT in burns. Current status of ESWT treatment for burns as well as future perspectives for research have been summarized and proposed. However, patients with burns cannot be considered recovered when the wounds have healed, we need some new technology to adjust to the challenges of the future.

Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stone impaction is associated with unfavorable endourological outcomes; however, reliable predictors of stone impaction are limited. We aimed to assess the performance of ureteral wall thickness on noncontrast computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone impaction and failure rates of spontaneous stone passage, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde guidewire and stent passage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was completed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A search was conducted in April 2022 for all adult, human, and English language studies investigating ureteral wall thickness using PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global, and SCOPUS. A systematic review and meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies) score. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a pooled population of 2,987 patients were included for quantitative analysis, and 34 studies were included in our qualitative review. Meta-analysis findings suggest that a thinner ureteral wall thickness is associated with more favorable subgroup stone outcomes. Thinner ureteral wall thickness suggests a lack of stone impaction and was associated with improved rates of spontaneous stone passage, successful retrograde guidewire and stent placement, and improved shock wave lithotripsy outcomes. Studies lack a standardized ureteral wall thickness measurement protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral wall thickness is a noninvasive measure that predicts ureteral stone impaction, and thin measurements are predictive of successful outcomes. Variability in measurement methods confirms that a standardized ureteral wall thickness protocol is needed, and the clinical utility of ureteral wall thickness is yet to be determined.

Comparison of various treatment modalities for the management of bone marrow edema syndrome/transient osteoporosis in men and non-pregnant women: a systematic review.

Transient osteoporosis (TO) or bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) is a self-limited clinical condition, which affects middle-aged men and women. It can be treated with miscellaneous conservative and surgical measures, which are analyzed in this systematic review. INTRODUCTION: BMES/TO is a transient clinical entity, which can be treated with various therapeutic modalities. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic options for the alleviation of pain and reduction of bone marrow edema (BME) in patients with BMES/TO, as well as to propose a therapeutic algorithm. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched. Eligibility and extraction of studies were conducted by two authors. Methodological quality assessment was carried out with the modified Delphi technique, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria, and Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Outcomes that were compared were time of pain resolution, VAS pain scores, and BME regression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: A total of 36 articles (880 patients) were included. Bisphosphonates had higher efficiency in less than 1-month outcomes on pain resolution compared with core decompression (CD), while iloprost was more efficient at 1-3 months compared with bisphosphonates and CD. At 3-6 months, all three of the aforementioned showed equal results on pain resolution, and at a period of 6-12 months, CD and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) showed excellent results followed by bisphosphonates and the conservative group (CG) consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or analgesics and/or restricted weight bearing. On MRI at 1-3 months, bisphosphonates, iloprost, and CD had relatively the same outcomes on BME resolution, with the least promising being the CG. At 3-6 months, CD seemed to have achieved the best results on the resolution of BME, followed by ESWT, CG, and bisphosphonates group. At 6-12 months, ESWT had the best outcomes compared with the conservative, bisphosphonates, and iloprost groups. CONCLUSION: BMES/TO has been treated with many non-standardized measures due to the low number of highly reliable studies. Current literature shows promising results with regard to the reduction of the clinical course of BMES/TO, but further large multicenter randomized controlled trials, as well as standardized radiological and clinical scores, are warranted to acquire evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic algorithm.

Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success rates depend on several stone and patient-related factors, one of which is stone density which is calculated on computed tomography scan in Hounsfield Units. Studies have shown inverse correlation between SWL success and HU; however, there remains considerable variation between studies. We performed a systematic review regarding the use of HU in SWL for renal calculi to consolidate the current evidence and address current knowledge gaps. RECENT FINDINGS: Database including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception through August 2022. Studies in English language analysing stone density/attenuation in adult patients undergoing SWL for renal calculi were included for assessment of Shockwave lithotripsy outcomes, use of stone attenuation to predict success, use of mean and peak stone density and Hounsfield unit density, determination of optimum cut-off values, nomograms/scoring systems, and assessment of stone heterogeneity. 28 studies with a total of 4,206 patients were included in this systematic review with sample size ranging from 30 to 385 patients. Male to female ratio was 1.8, with an average age of 46.3 years. Mean overall ESWL success was 66.5%. Stone size ranged from 4 to 30 mm in diameter. Mean stone density was used by two-third of the studies to predict the appropriate cut-off for SWL success, ranging from 750 to 1000 HU. Additional factors such as peak HU and stone heterogeneity index were also evaluated with variable results. Stone heterogeneity index was considered a better indicator for success in larger stones (cut-off value of 213) and predicting SWL stone clearance in one session. Prediction scores had been attempted, with researchers looking into combining stone density with other factors such as skin to stone distance, stone volume, and differing heterogeneity indices with variable results. Numerous studies demonstrate a link between shockwave lithotripsy outcomes and stone density. Hounsfield unit < 750 has been found to be associated with shockwave lithotripsy success, with likelihood of failure strongly associated with values over 1000. Prospective standardisation of Hounsfield unit measurement and predictive algorithm for shockwave lithotripsy outcome should be considered to strengthen future evidence and help clinicians in the decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database: CRD42020224647.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of delivering extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) to patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). It also aimed to explore any potential clinical effect of ESWT on wound healing and investigate whether ESWT offers any patient-reported benefits. METHOD: In this single-centre, mixed methods feasibility study, patients with a DFU who met the eligibility criteria underwent ESWT three times over a seven-day period. Primary outcome was feasibility of delivering the intervention. Secondary outcomes included wound size, number of DFUs healed at 12 weeks and quality of life (QoL). Semi-structured interviews explored participants' experience of undergoing ESWT. RESULTS: Of 106 patients screened, 24 (22.6%) were recruited. Following recruitment, two patients were withdrawn from the study with 22 patients included in the final analysis. The mean attendance at clinic was 90.9% and 65.1% for follow-up. The mean score for acceptability and tolerability was 9.86±0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.62-10.01) and 9.15±2.57 (95% CI: 7.87-10.42), respectively. There were no serious adverse events or side-effects. Of the DFUs, 45.5% healed during follow-up and QoL scores improved until eight weeks. Key themes identified from the qualitative interviews were: desire for fast healing; improved QoL; flexibility of new treatments; and accessibility of transport. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that it is possible to recruit and retain patents into a single-arm study of ESWT for DFUs. This study supports development of a large randomised control trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ESWT for DFU healing.

Early application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves pain control and functional scores in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The use of biophysical stimuli produced by extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can improve the rehabilitation treatment of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of our study is to evaluate the short-term efficacy of early postoperative ESWT in combination with physiotherapy in terms of pain reduction and motor function recovery of patients undergoing TKA and compare it with conventional physiotherapy treatment. METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing TKA were enrolled in the study from January 2019 to February 2020. Patients received two sessions of physiotherapy daily, with (experimental group) or without (control group) four sessions of ESWT within seven days after surgery. Patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at post-operative day two and seven. Assessment included active knee range of motion (aROM), timed up and go (TUG) test, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and Borg scale. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed the study. Both treatments proved to be effective in reducing pain and improving the knee range of motion and functional scores at seven days after surgery: the aROM in the ESWT group was 36.8 ± 11.0 grades (p < 0.001), while in control group was 19.8 ± 7.8 grades (p < 0.001). TUG, VAS, and BORG scores showed a similar trend. Comparative analysis revealed superior clinical results for the experimental group in all the outcomes, in particular aROM (96.0 ± 5.40 vs. 81.20 ± 11.01, p < 0.001) and TUG test (17.4 ± 5.61 vs. 21.24 ± 5.88, p < 0.001), at day seven after surgery. CONCLUSION: Early application of ESWT in addition to physiotherapy can positively influence the rehabilitation process after TKA. The treatment proved to be well tolerated and safe. Preliminary results demonstrated better pain control and functional scores compared to physiotherapy alone.

Double screw versus angular stable plate fixation of scaphoid waist nonunions in combination with intraoperative extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT).

INTRODUCTION: Over the past years, different fixation techniques focused on rotational stability in order to increase stability and stimulate union rates. Additionally, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has gained importance in the treatment of delayed and nonunions. Purpose of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome of two headless compression screws (HCS) and plate fixation in scaphoid nonunions, in combination with intraoperative high energy ESWT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with scaphoid nonunions were treated by using a nonvascularized bone graft from the iliac crest and stabilization with either two HCS or a volar angular stable scaphoid plate. All patients received one ESWT session with 3000 impulses and energy flux per pulse of 0.41 mJ/mm2 intraoperatively. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength, disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Wrist Score. To confirm union, a CT scan of the wrist was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients returned for clinical and radiological examination. Out of these, 29 (91%) showed bony union. All patients treated with two HCS compared to 16 out of 19 (84%) patients treated by plate showed bony union on the CT scans. The difference was not statistically significant. However, at a mean follow-up interval of 34 months, no significant differences could be found in ROM, pain, grip strength and patient-reported outcome measurements between the two HCS and plate group. Height-to-length ratio and capitolunate angle improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Scaphoid nonunion stabilization by using two HCS or angular stable volar plate fixation and intraoperative ESWT results in comparable high union rates and good functional outcome. Due to the higher rate for a secondary intervention (plate removal), HCS might be preferable as first choice, whereas the scaphoid plate fixation should be reserved for recalcitrant (substantial bone loss, humpback deformity or failed prior surgical intervention) scaphoid nonunions.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction - a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LIEST) for erectile dysfunction (ED), pointing out which concepts are already consolidated and which paths we still need to advance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature on the role of shockwave therapies in erectile dysfunction, selecting publications in PUBMED, including only relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. RESULTS: We found 11 studies (7 clinical trials, 3 systematic review and 1 meta-analysis) that evaluated the use of LIEST for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. One clinical trial evaluated the applicability in Peyronie's Disease and one other clinical trial evaluated the applicability after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The literature presents little scientific evidence but suggests good results with the use of LIEST for ED. Despite a real optimism since it is a treatment modality capable of acting on the pathophysiology of ED, we must remain cautious, until a larger volume of higher quality studies allows us to establish which patient profile, type of energy and application protocol will achieve clinically satisfactory results.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is the most common cause of prolonged hospitalization with a high cost of care due to unsatisfactory outcomes with the current mode of therapy. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a new technology in the care of nonhealing wounds. The study's main objective was to compare the healing parameters of DFUs between patients undergoing the standard of care (SOC) alone and ESWT + SOC. The secondary objective was to assess inflammatory markers in both study groups. The study was designed as a single-center, randomized trial to provide evidence on the effects of ESWT on DFU healing. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment. Forty-eight participants were recruited, enrolled, and randomly allocated into the 2 study groups. Twenty-five patients were allocated to the ESWT + SOC group, and 23 patients were allocated into the SOC-only group for a treatment period of 6 weeks. The univariate binary analysis showed more patients with healed DFU in the ESWT + SOC group than the SOC-only group at 6 weeks, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR = 3.2, p = .07). The adjusted multivariate binary analysis confirmed this finding; however, the effect size did not reach statistical significance at 6 weeks (OR = 3.9, p = .08). The level of circulating inflammatory markers was similar in both groups of patients. It is the author's opinion that there is a potential benefit of ESWT on diabetic wound healing with further research warranted to determine its role in treatment of DFU. A larger trial with a more extended treatment period is, however, needed to substantiate our findings.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review.

Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to standard care alone in participants with DFUs. Search results were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE approach was used to assess bias and certainty. The primary outcome was time to healing. The search identified 345 papers after duplicates removed. Six trials consisting of 471 participants were included. There was unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. Time to ulcer healing was probably shorter in patients treated with ESWT compared with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). Patients treated with ESWT were more likely to heal at 20 weeks post-ESWT compared with those treated with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). There was significant heterogeneity. ESWT remains a promising new treatment but the translation into routine clinical practice is still limited by the low certainty of evidence surrounding its effectiveness, case selection and optimum dose.

[Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves symptoms of erectile dysfunction: A preliminary study].

OBJECTIVE: To verify the effect and safety of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) in improving the symptoms of ED, and provide some reference for further related large-scale clinical trials. METHODS: Twenty-six patients diagnosed with ED received Li-ESWT with an energy of 0.09 mJ/mm2 for 20 minutes once a week for 6 four-week courses. Before and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment, we obtained the IIEF-5 and Erectile Hardness Scale (EHS) scores of the patients using questionnaires, recorded the incidence of treatment-related adverse reactions, compared the erectile function of the patients before and after treatment, and evaluated the effect and safety of Li-ESWT in improving ED-related symptoms. RESULTS: Compared with the baseline, the IIEF-5 scores of the patients were significantly increased (P < 0.01) while the EHS scores slightly increased at 3 months after Li-ESWT treatment (P > 0.05), both IIEF-5 and EHS scores were dramatically increased at 6 months (P < 0.01), and both significantly higher than at 3 months. At 9 months, EHS scores remained remarkably higher than the baseline (P < 0.01) although IIEF-5 scores slightly lower than at 6 months. At 12 months, however, IIEF-5 scores decreased, though still significantly higher than the baseline (P < 0.01), and EHS scores became lower than at 6 and 9 months (P < 0.05) but still markedly higher than before treatment (P < 0.05). Adverse reactions observed during the intervention mainly included pruritus (4.35%), pain (2.90%), paresthesia (2.17%), and petechiae/ecchymosis (2.90%). CONCLUSION: Li-ESWT can increase the IIEF-5 and EHS scores and improve the clinical symptoms of ED patients, with a low incidence of adverse reactions during the treatment.

Comparison of pain relief and limb function improvement after extracorporeal shock wave therapy and thermomagnetic therapy in the treatment of low back pain.

Objective: To compare the rehabilitation effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and thermomagnetic therapy (TMT) in patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods: As a single-centre retrospective observational study, clinical data of patients with LBP who received rehabilitation treatment in our hospital from January 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively collected. Based on the treatment mode, the patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: the control group (patients received core muscle training + TMT, n=51) and the observation group (patients received core muscle training + ESWT, n=56). The general data of the patients were collected and the groups were matched for age, gender and pain duration. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain, improvement of limb function, ß-endorphin (ß-EP), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and nitric oxide (NO) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results: The VAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group at one, two weeks and one month after the treatment (P<0.05). After the treatment, the proportion of mild limb dysfunction in the observation group was 57.14% (32/56), which was higher than 35.29% (1 /51) in the control group. The proportion of patients with severe and obvious disorders was 0 and 5.36% (3/56), respectively, which was lower than 11.76% (6/51) and 5.88% (3/51) in the control group (P<0.05). After the treatment, levels of NO and PGE2 in the observation group were lower, and the level of ß-EP was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions: A combination of core muscle training and ESWT can effectively improve the analgesic effect of the treatment and promote greater improvement of limb function in patients with LBP.

Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Various conservative treatment methods can be administered in the early stages of plantar fasciitis (PF). The aim of the treatment is to enable the patient to return to the physical activity as soon as possible. AIM: In this study it was aimed to compare efficacies of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on patients with PF. DESIGN: A local prospective cross-sectional study SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic of Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine POPULATION: Patients aged 18-70 years, having ongoing heel pain for at least 3 months, and not using oral and/or parenteral corticosteroids in the last 6 months. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with PF included in the current study. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association Score (AOFAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire were performed for all patients. ESWT and LLLT groups comprised of 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients, respectively. RESULTS: We found significant improvements in scores based on the VAS, RMS, AOFAS, FFI in patients with PF and it was sustained for 3 months (p = 0.001, for all scores). While decrease in scores based on the VAS and FFI in LLLT group was statistically more significant compared to ESWT group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013), there was statistically less significant decrease in scores on the AOFAS in LLLT group than that of ESWT group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated significant improvements in terms of pain, functional status and daily life activities following the administration of either of the treatments. Furthermore, LLLT was found to be significantly more effective for alleviating pain than ESWT in the treatment of PF.