A new stomaplasty ring (Koring™) to prevent parastomal hernia: an observational multicenter Swiss study.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernias (PSH) are one of the most frequent complications of enterostomies with a non-negligible complication rate and a significant socioeconomic effect. Therefore, preventing PSH by placing a mesh at the time of primary surgery has been advocated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new stomaplasty ring [Koring™, (Koring GmbH, Basel, Switzerland)] and investigate the reason why surgeons are reluctant to take preventive measures. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was conducted on 30 patients between December 2013 and January 2015. In permanent end colostomies and end ileostomies, the Koring™ was implanted. The primary outcome was the 30-day morbidity (infection and other stoma-related complications). Secondary endpoints were the technical feasibility and the time needed to fix the ring. In addition, an online survey of 107 surgeons was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received permanent end colostomies, and three received end ileostomies. No stoma-related complication was detected within the first 30 days post-operatively. The Koring™ ring was evaluated by the surgeons as easy and very easy to implant in more than half of the patients. Average additional operating time for ring implantation was 19 min. CONCLUSIONS: Koring™ implantation at the time of creating the stoma is safe, easy and only adds minimally operating time. A long-term follow-up as well as a randomized controlled study is needed to evaluate the impact of the Koring™ on PSH prevention. The ease and rapidity with which Koring™ can be implanted may help surgeons to overcome their apprehension of using a preventative device.

A stomaplasty for total laryngectomy with a previous tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Stomaplasties were widely used to prevent or revise stomal stenosis, however, a previous tracheostomy can limit the choice of some techniques. This study aims to deal with this condition through a novel and simple technique called "Collar stomaplasty". METHODS: This study involved 43 patients submitted for laryngectomy between 2017 and 2020. A tracheostomy 6-31 days prior to laryngectomy was performed in all cases. The collar stomaplasty, shaping the previous tracheostomy and surrounding skin, included 17 cases and the traditional X-shaped stomaplasty included 26 cases. Fisher's exact test was applied in an intergroup comparison of complications. RESULTS: One out of the collar stomaplasty group demonstrated perioperative stomal infection and avascular necrosis (5.9%). Another developed stomal stenosis (5.9%). In the X-shaped stomaplasty group, necrosis at the tip of the tracheal flap occurred in 14 cases (53.8%), and stomal stenosis occurred in 5 cases (19.2%). A statistically significance occurred in stomal necrosis (p<0.05) while no statistically difference is observed in stomal stenosis (p>0.05) between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The collar stomaplasty technique creates a laryngectomy tracheostoma by remodeling a previous tracheostomy. A wide and stable stoma, which facilitates stomal care, can be accomplished by this simple technique.

Stomaplasty with pannicuectomy in an obese patient with stomal retraction: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Stomal retraction is a common complication following stoma formation. A repeat surgical procedure for stomal revision is an invasive treatment that is often required as a result. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old woman with obstructive rectal carcinoma and perforative peritonitis underwent an emergent anterior resection and colostomy (Hartmann's operation). After the operation, the patient changed the stoma pouch every day because of stomal retraction and leakage. Thirty-eight days after the operation, we performed a stomaplasty with pannicuectomy. Following this procedure, the patient changed the stoma pouch twice weekly. DISCUSSION: Stomal retraction is caused by the thick subcutaneous fat and abnormal skin folds in obese patients, as well as the excess tension that is the result of inadequate mobilization. Treatment of stomal retraction typically requires an intraperitoneal stoma revision. Our method of panniculectomy with skin excision but without stomal revision does not involve an incision around the stoma and there is no risk of fecal contamination. CONCLUSION: We report a case of an obese patient who underwent stomaplasty with pannicuectomy for stomal retraction. We believe that stomaplasty with pannicuectomy is a feasible option in obese patients with stomal retraction.