Superior Capsular Reconstruction with the mini open key-hole Technique using Achilles allograft demonstrates favorable outcomes for patients with preoperative pseudoparalysis but worse outcome and strength with longer duration pseudoparalysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether unique SCR with key-hole technique using Achilles allograft can improve pseudoparalysis in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears and additionally to identify preoperative factors that influence clinical outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2018 and October 2021, patient data from SCR with our institution's unique key-hole technique using Achilles were retrospectively collected (minimum 2-years follow up). The patients were categorized into pseudoparalysis group (P group) and no pseudoparalysis group (NP group). Active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder, clinical scores (constant and pain visual analog scale scores) and muscle strength was assessed preoperatively and at 2-years postoperatively. And the correlation between preoperative and postoperative clinical data was analyzed through simple linear regression in the P group. RESULTS: 69 patients who underwent SCR with key-hole technique using Achilles, were included in the study. Group P and NP had 24 and 45 cases, respectively. Preoperative ROM (FE, ER), constant score and muscle strength (FE, ER) were significantly lower in P group than NP group. At 2-year follow-up the active ROM (FE, p<0.001, ER, p<0.001), constant score, VAS, muscle strength (FE, p<0.001, ER, p<0.001) were improved in the P group. In P group, pseudoparalysis recovered in 21 out of 24 patients (87.5%) at 2-year after surgery. The minimum clinically important difference of patient reported outcomes (Constant Score / VAS) were 8.15/1.05 for the P group and 9.47/0.92 for the NP group. Among the 3 cases of recovery failed, 2 cases were due to graft failure, and 1 case had delayed recovery. Prolonged preoperative pseudoparalysis and weaker preoperative external rotation strength were associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Superior capsular reconstruction with mini open key-hole technique using Achilles allograft demonstrates favorable outcomes for patients with preoperative pseudoparalysis. However, for SCR with the pseudoparalyis patients the careful attention is needed because the longer pseudoparalysis duration and the weaker external rotation strength could have the tendency of worse postoperative outcomes.

Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the effects of gender and age on achieving clinically significant outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients undergoing ASCR for irreparable rotator cuff tear between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROMs were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each functional score and analyzed according to age and gender. The percentages of patients achieving MCID and PASS were recorded. RESULTS: The study included 83 patients, with a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.4 years. Significant improvements were found in ASES, Constant, SANE, and VAS for all groups based on gender and age. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curves, all scores had acceptable areas under the curve for PASS. Values for PASS and MCID were 81.5 and 10.3 for ASES; 61.5 and 6.2 for Constant; 82.5 and 11.5 for SANE and 1.5 and 1.1 for VAS, respectively. Analysis of achieving MCID and PASS showed no difference between the groups in the majority of outcome measures. However, female patients achieved the SANE thresholds for PASS at significantly higher rates than male patients. Patients ≥65 years old achieved ASES and Constant thresholds for MCID at significantly higher rates than patients ˂65 years old. CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved MCID and PASS at a 2-year follow-up. Patients showed comparable rates of MCID and PASS achievement on most outcome tools based on age and gender. Female patients achieved PASS on SANE at significantly higher rates than male patients and older patients achieved MCID on ASES and Constant at higher rates than young patients. Thus, age is a stronger factor for achieving MCID than gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Rate of graft retear is higher in over-the-top superior capsular reconstruction for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis tear.

PURPOSE: To compare side-to-side superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with over-the-top SCR in terms of functional outcomes, pain relief and allograft survival rates. METHODS: Patients who had undergone arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and clinical follow-up for ≥2 years were recruited. All patients underwent postoperative assessment with routine radiographic analysis for acromiohumeral distances, ultrasound imaging 1 and 3 months after SCR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 12 months after SCR. The outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. RESULTS: SCR was performed in 56 patients including side-to-side SCR in 32 and over-the-top SCR in 24. Postoperative MRI showed that the grafts were intact in 46 patients (82.1%; 26 who underwent side-to-side SCR and 20 who underwent over-the-top SCR). The proportion of nonhealing grafts in the over-the-top group was significantly higher with concomitant subscapularis tears (60% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.02). VAS scores and functional outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups and postoperative VAS (1.4 vs. 1.7; n.s.), Constant (74.8 vs. 76.0; n.s.), mean ASES (87.4 vs. 89.1; n.s.) and mean SANE (81.7 vs. 84.3; n.s.) scores did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: For massive rotator cuff tears, over-the-top and side-to-side SCR achieve similar pain relief and functional improvement, and the rate of healing allografts is high. However, over-the-top SCR is not recommended for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with repairable subscapularis tendon tears due to a higher nonhealing rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

When and how much does the muscle strength recover after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: Recently, arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been performed for irreparable large to massive rotator cuff tears and excellent clinical results have been reported. Although the muscle strength is reported to recover, it has not yet been clarified when and how much it recovers. The purpose of this study was to determine the recovery pattern of muscle strength after SCR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients (mean age, 65 years) who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) patients with large to massive irreparable tears of the rotator cuff including the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons; (2) those with severe muscle atrophy and fatty change; (3) those who underwent assessment of muscle quality and strength by magnetic resonance imaging and dynamometry at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years; (4) those with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years; and (5) those without severe osteoarthritis. The isometric muscle strength of scaption (ie, scapular-plane elevation), internal rotation, and external rotation in adduction was measured twice for each motion by a dynamometer. RESULTS: Relative to the muscle strength on the uninvolved side, the involved side showed 61% ± 21% in scaption, 63% ± 20% in external rotation, and 103% ± 29% in internal rotation at 2 years after surgery. Whereas no significant differences were observed between the 1-year and 2-year follow-up assessments, a significant difference in muscle strength of scaption was found between 6 months and 1 year (P = .0174). Graft retear was seen in 5 cases (14%). There was a trend that the muscle strength of scaption and external rotation in the no-retear group was greater than that in the retear group despite no significant difference (P = .0717 and P = .0824, respectively). CONCLUSION: The recovery of the muscle strength after SCR was observed until 1 year after surgery, and the muscle strength of scaption and external rotation returned to 60% of that on the uninvolved side at 2 years.

Midterm outcome of superior capsular reconstruction using doubled acellular human dermal allograft for irreparable rotator cuff tear.

BACKGROUND: Thicker (folded) facia lata autografts have been shown to be superior to thinner grafts and single-layered acellular human dermal (HD) allografts for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in biomechanical studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes following SCR for irreparable supraspinatus tears using doubled (folded) HD allograft. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had undergone SCR using doubled HD allograft between February 2012 and January 2020 were recruited in a continuous manner in this retrospective study. The inclusion criteria were SCR performed for irreparable supraspinatus tear and a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score. The secondary outcome measures were complications and revision surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed between patients who received a "standard" graft of mean 3-mm thickness or a "thick" graft of mean 4.4-mm thickness. RESULTS: One patient was lost to follow-up. A total of 31 patients (31 shoulder joints) were analyzed with a mean follow-up duration of 48 months (range, 25-96 months). Following surgery, there was significant improvement in the ASES score from 18.1 ± 14.3 (preoperative) to 76.3 ± 25.1 (postoperative) (P < .001), with a satisfactory clinical outcome obtained in 83.8% of the patients. In a subset of 8 patients completing 5 years' follow-up, the clinical improvements were sustained. The percentage of patients with a clinically successful outcome was higher among those with thick grafts compared to those with standard grafts, although this failed to reach statistical significance (94.4% vs. 69.2%, risk ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.99, P = .13). One patient within the standard group underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSION: SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears with doubled HD allograft results in improved clinical outcomes and low reoperation at midterm follow-up duration.

Comparison of the clinical outcomes and temporal changes between superior capsular reconstruction and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritic change.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are widely performed in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, including pseudoparalytic shoulder (PPS), and have shown positive clinical outcomes. However, limited studies have compared these two in terms of functional recovery in patients with PPS without osteoarthritic change. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and to clarify the characteristics and differences in temporal changes among patients who underwent either RTSA or SCR using tensor fascia lata for PPS due to irreparable rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritic change (Hamada grade ≤ 3). METHODS: We enrolled a total of 39 patients who underwent SCR (n = 20) or RTSA (n = 19 cases) with a follow-up period of 2 years. All patients were follow-up at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and temporal changes in ROMs were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The SCR group had significantly better ROM than the RTSA group in flexion (146° ± 34° vs. 132° ± 23°, P = 0.022), abduction (147° ± 36° vs. 130° ± 23°, P = 0.0092), internal rotation (11 ± 3 Th10 vs. 6 ± 3 L3, P < 0.001), and ASES score (84.1 ± 13.8 vs. 80.1 ± 6.1, P = 0.0096). While the RTSA group achieved 100° in flexion and abduction after 3 months postoperatively, the SCR group took approximately 5 months. However, the SCR group exceeded the RTSA group in flexion and abduction at six months postoperatively. In the SCR group, some patients with irreparable subscapularis tendon tears could not achieve 90° shoulder elevation. Both groups showed significant improvements in shoulder flexion and abduction compared to the preoperative state (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although SCR requires a longer rehabilitation period, it provides similar outcomes to RTSA after two years for non-osteoarthritic, irreparable cuff tears with pseudoparalysis.

Margin convergence vs. superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is preoperative pseudoparesis.

BACKGROUND: Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n = 28) or SCR (n = 31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P < .05). RESULTS: Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P < .001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151° ± 26° vs. 142° ± 38°; P = .325) and ER (48° ± 12° vs. 46° ± 11°; P = .284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF < 90°), SCR (n = 9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n = 5) (141° ± 38° vs. 67° ± 24°; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.

Reversing chronic pseudoparesis secondary to massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear: superior capsular reconstruction vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have defined pseudoparesis as limited active forward elevation between 45° and 90° and maintained passive range of motion (ROM) in the setting of a massive rotator cuff tear (RCT). Although pseudoparesis can be reliably reversed with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), the optimal treatment for this indication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of RSA to SCR in patients with pseudoparesis secondary to massive, irreparable RCT (miRCT). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 40-70 years with pseudoparesis secondary to miRCT who were treated with either RSA or SCR by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon from 2016 to 2021 with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to compare active ROM, visual analog pain scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score between RSA and SCR while controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in the RSA cohort and 23 patients were included in the SCR cohort with similar mean follow-up times (26.2 ± 21.1 vs. 21.9 ± 14.7 months, respectively). The patients in the RSA group were significantly older than those in the SCR group (65.2 ± 4.4 vs. 54.2 ± 7.8 years, P < .001) and had more severe arthritis (1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 Samilson-Prieto, P = .019). The pseudoparesis reversal rate among the RSA and SCR cohorts was 96.3% and 91.3%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the RSA cohort demonstrated significantly greater mean improvement in active FF (89° ± 26° vs. 73° ± 30° change, P = .048), greater postoperative SSV (91 ± 8% vs. 69 ± 25%, P < .001), lower postoperative VAS pain scores (0.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.2 ± 2.9, P = .020), and less postoperative internal rotation (IR; 4.6° ± 1.6° vs. 6.9° ± 1.8°, P = .004) compared with SCR. On multivariate analysis controlling for age and osteoarthritis, RSA remained a significant predictor of greater SSV (ß = 21.5, P = .021) and lower VAS scores (ß = -1.4, P = .037), whereas SCR was predictive of greater IR ROM (ß = 3.0, P = .043). CONCLUSION: Although both RSA and SCR effectively reverse pseudoparesis, patients with RSA have higher SSV and lower pain scores but less IR after controlling for age and osteoarthritis. The results of this study may inform surgical decision making for patients who are suitable candidates for either procedure.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging rotator cuff tendon stump classification correlates with the surgical outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between rotator cuff stump classification and postoperative outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). METHODS: A total of 75 patients who underwent SCR between June 2013 and May 2021 were included in this study. Based on stump classification using the signal intensity ratio of the tendon rupture site to the deltoid muscle in the coronal view of preoperative T2-weighted, fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging scans, the patients were classified into types 1, 2, and 3 with ratios of <0.8, 0.8-1.3, and >1.3 (44, 17, and 14 patients, respectively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and range of motion were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. The acromiohumeral distance and rotator cuff arthropathy according to the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. The graft integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Clinical and radiological outcomes were significantly improved after SCR. In comparison with type 2 and 3 patients, type 1 patients had significantly higher ASES scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 84 ± 10, 75 ± 15, and 76 ± 14; all P = .014), Constant scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 65 ± 5, 61 ± 9, and 56 ± 13; all P = .005), and forward flexion (type 1, 2, and 3 = 155 ± 10, 154 ± 15, and 145 ± 13; all P = .013). However, these statistical differences between groups were below the established minimum clinically important difference values for the ASES and Constant scores after rotator cuff repair. The graft failure rate after surgery was lower in the type 1 group than that in the other 2 groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .749). CONCLUSION: Patients with stump classification type 1 showed significantly better functional scores (ASES and VAS scores) and forward flexion; however, the clinical importance of these differences may be limited. Stump classification may be useful for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.

Does body mass index affect outcomes following arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using fascia lata autograft for massive irreparable rotator cuff tear?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of increased body mass index (BMI) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) obtained > two years postoperatively following arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent ASCR with a minimum two year follow-up. All patients were divided into normal (BMI < 25.0), overweight (BMI 25-30.0), and obese (BMI ≥ 30) according to preoperative BMI. Patients were assessed using the PROs preoperatively and at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively, including the visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant-Murley scores. The time required to achieve each CSO was analyzed and compared. Multivariate analyses evaluated the predictor variables and time required to achieve CSOs. RESULTS: This study included 63 patients with a mean age of 64.8 ± 8.6 years, including 31 normal BMI, 25 overweight, and seven obese patients. Significant improvements in VAS and ASES scores after ASCR were observed in all three groups. Normal and overweight patients had significant improvements in the Constant score; however, no difference was observed in obese patients. No significant difference was observed in the probability distributions of CSOs between the BMI groups. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the probability distributions of the CSOs, ASES, and Constant scores at each time point, among the BMI groups. CONCLUSION: Patients in the normal and overweight groups had significant improvements in the VAS, ASES, and Constant scores after ASCR. Patients in the obese group had a significant improvement in VAS score; however, there is no difference for the ASES and Constant scores in the obese group. However, no differences were observed in all PROMs and the likelihood of achieving CSOs among the different BMI groups.

Superior capsular reconstruction with the long head of the biceps tendon achieves excellent clinical results and low rotator cuff rerupture rates one year after cuff repair surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical one-year evolution of healed and rerupture lesions in patients who received a rotator cuff repair plus Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps (LHB). Moreover, to compare this evolution between men and women. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted on patients who underwent a rotator cuff repair plus SCR with LHB between February 2021 and June 2022. All patients completed pre-operative and one-year post-operative evaluations for tendon type of tear and tendon integrity using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)after one year of the surgery. Besides, functionality was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the visual analog scale for pain (VAS); and the Constant score. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients completed the one-year final evaluation, they presented an increased functionality score to 83 and 86 in Constant and ASES scales (p < .001), respectively. Besides, 84% of the patients presented a healed cuff, while rerupture occurred in 16% of the patients. There were differences between the healed and rerupture patients in the total Constant score, with a remarkable increase in the strength subscale, almost double for patients with healed cuff (p < .001); in the same way, daily life activity score, and balance subscale increased, while pain score decreased in the healed cuff group (p < .05). There was no difference in functionality between men and women (p > .05). Besides, almost all patients achieved the MCID in both ASES and Constant total scores, irrespectively of the healing group. CONCLUSION: The cuff repair using SCR with the LHB achieved a low percentage of rerupture and a functional improvement after one year of follow-up. Patients who healed the lesion presented more strength and better performance in daily life activities than those with cuff repurture. Thus, SCR + LHB procedure can be considered an efficient technique for rotator cuff repair surgery for both men and women. Although a comparison with a control group is needed to confirm these findings.

Superior capsular reconstruction using hybrid graft for irreparable massive rotator cuff tear.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using hybrid grafts composed of tensor fascia lata autografts and human dermal allografts. METHODS: This study included 30 patients with chronic irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (RCTs) who underwent arthroscopic SCR using a hybrid graft composed of tensor fascia lata autograft and human dermal allograft. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the pain visual analogue scale score, shoulder range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, constant score, University of California-Los Angeles score, and simple shoulder test score preoperatively and at least 2 years after surgery. Radiographic analysis included the Hamada classification grade, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and graft integrity at 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: All patients exhibited significant clinical improvement in all functional outcome measurements, except external rotation (all P < 0.05). The number of patients who exhibited pseudoparalysis decreased from 7 (23.3%) to 2 (6.7%) postoperatively. Complications were not observed. Radiologically, the mean postoperative AHD increased significantly from 6.9 ± 1.6 cm to 8.8 ± 2.1 cm at 2 years postoperatively (P < 0.001). Twenty five out of the 30 (83.3%) patients showed successful graft healing, and all healing failures occurred on the humeral side. The differences between the healed-graft and failed-graft groups were significantly lower graft thickness (P = 0.001) and smaller AHD (P < 0.001) in the failed-graft group. Every functional outcome scores were not statistically different between healed-graft and failed-graft groups. CONCLUSIONS: An arthroscopic SCR technique using a hybrid graft consisting of a tensor fascia lata autograft and human dermal allograft showed satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with irreparable RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Postoperative MRI signal intensity correlates functional outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using fascia lata autograft has been performed for irreparable rotator cuff tear recently. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of the graft on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may reflect the degree of graft maturity and healing. However, how SNQ changes with graft remodelling and time and whether this change correlates with postoperative clinical outcomes after SCR remain unknown. This study aimed to explore the correlation between SNQ of the fascia lata autograft and clinical functional outcomes after SCR. METHODS: Patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear undergoing SCR using fascia lata autograft between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. For clinical outcomes, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and range of motion (ROM; forward flexion and external rotation) were evaluated at postoperative 6 and 12 months. Signal intensity of the humeral, mid-substance, and glenoid sites and background were measured to calculate the SNQ values on follow-up MRI at 3 and 12 months. The correlations between clinical outcomes and SNQ at different time points were then analysed. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean postoperative VAS score significantly increased at postoperative 6 months and significantly decreased at postoperative 12 months. Except for forward flexion, all other functional outcomes were improved at postoperative 6 months. Analysis of MRI showed SNQ at the humeral (SNQh), mid-substance, and glenoid sites decreased from postoperative 3 to 12 months with a statistical significance detected in SNQh (P < 0.01). Correlation analyses showed that the SNQh values negatively correlated with VAS, ASES, Constant-Murley score, SANE, ROM (forward flexion), and ROM (external rotation) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SNQ of the fascia lata autograft decreased with time in patients receiving SCR. SNQ at the humeral site was negatively correlated with clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Time required to achieve clinically significant outcomes after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the time-dependent nature of clinically significant outcomes, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction, and the factors contributing to the achievement of early clinically significant outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent ASCR between March 2015 and September 2020 with complete preoperative and postoperative 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were retrospectively analysed. Threshold values for MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and PASS were obtained from the previous literature for the PROMs. The time required to achieve clinically significant outcomes was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to evaluate the variables predictive of an earlier or delayed achievement of MCID. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients with a mean age of 64.5 ± 8.7 years old were included. The time of mean achievement of MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and PASS for VAS was 11.2 ± 0.9, 16.3 ± 1.1, and 16.6 ± 0.9 months, respectively. The time of mean achievement of MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and PASS for ASES was 13.2 ± 1.0, 16.8 ± 1.0, and 18.3 ± 0.9 months, respectively. The time of mean achievement of MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and PASS for the Constant score was 11.6 ± 0.9, 15.1 ± 1.0, and 14.7 ± 0.9 months, respectively. The time of mean achievement of MCID, substantial clinical benefit, and PASS for SANE was 14.4 ± 1.0, 16.1 ± 1.0, and 15.5 ± 0.8 months, respectively. Patients with a higher preoperative VAS score achieved an earlier MCID for VAS (P = 0.014). However, patients with a higher preoperative ASES and SANE scores achieved delayed MCID for ASES and SANE (P = 0.026, and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved MCIDs around 1 year after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A higher preoperative VAS score favours faster MCID achievement, while higher preoperative ASES and SANE scores contribute to delayed MCID achievement. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The quantification of muscle activities during arm elevation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty or superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears using positron emission tomography.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are recognized as surgical options for an irreparable rotator cuff tear. However, the postoperative changes of the muscle activity patterns remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the quantified muscle activities on shoulder elevation in patients treated with RSA or SCR using fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. METHODS: Asymptomatic shoulders that underwent RSA or SCR and those without a rotator cuff tear were analyzed as the RSA, SCR, and control groups. All subjects underwent shoulder elevation exercise, followed by a fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography examination. Using previously established methods to quantify the uptake of each muscle on positron emission tomography images, the standard uptake values (SUVs) for 16 portions of the deltoid, rotator cuff, and periscapular muscles were obtained to compare the muscle activity patterns among 3 groups. RESULTS: The deltoid muscle showed the most characteristic differences according to the surgeries. The mean SUVs of the anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid were 3.3, 3.7, and 1.5 for the RSA group; 2.7, 4.2, and 1.5 for the SCR group; and 1.3, 2.0, and 0.9 for the control group, respectively. In comparison to the control group, both the RSA and SCR groups showed significantly increased SUVs at all portions of the deltoid muscle. The RSA group showed similar SUVs for the anterior and middle deltoid, whereas the SCR and control groups showed greatest SUVs at the middle deltoid. In addition, the serratus anterior, levator scapulae, and upper portion of the trapezius in the RSA group showed greater SUVs than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The deltoid muscle showed increased activity in the RSA and SCR groups. The middle deltoid was mainly used in the SCR group, whereas the anterior and middle deltoid, as well as the upward rotator muscles of the scapula, were mainly used in the RSA group.

Evaluation of muscle strength recovery following superior capsular reconstruction using a tensor fascia lata graft: a comparison with the unaffected side.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a tensor fascia lata graft has been performed in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears and shoulder pseudoparalysis (PPS), and good clinical results have been reported. This procedure can be indicated for younger patients who are highly active in sports and manual labor from the viewpoint of joint preservation. However, this procedure supplements the defect with a graft that has no muscle contractility; therefore, the extent to which shoulder muscle strength is recovered after SCR remains unclear. We hypothesized that the recovery of muscle strength after SCR would not be normalized and would be only approximately 50% of that of the healthy (unaffected) side. This study aimed to evaluate muscle strength after SCR in patients with PPS due to irreparable rotator cuff tears and the extent of recovery by comparing with that of the unaffected side. METHODS: In total, 20 patients who underwent SCR for PPS using a tensor fascia lata graft with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Shoulder muscle strength in abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation was evaluated using a handheld dynamometer. Muscle strength was compared to that on the unaffected side, and the affected/unaffected ratio was measured. Shoulder range of motionand acromiohumeral distance were also evaluated. RESULTS: The postoperative range of motions and acromiohumeral distance (4.0 ± 1.4 mm vs. 8.4 ± 1.9 mm, P < .001) were significantly improved compared to those preoperatively. In external and internal rotation, the muscle strength of the affected side was recovered by approximately 80% compared to that of the unaffected side. However, in abduction, the muscle strength of the affected side (2.9 ± 1.5 kg) could not reach 50% (48.0 ± 15.9%, range: 25.0%-76.5%) of that of the unaffected side (5.9 ± 1.8 kg). CONCLUSION: Abduction strength was not sufficiently restored after SCR when compared to that on the unaffected side.

Minimal inter-surgeon agreement on the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis in patients with massive rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoparalysis is commonly used to describe patients with severe loss of active elevation associated with advanced rotator cuff disease, but its definition in the literature has been variable. This study aimed to determine how 15 expert shoulder surgeons use the term "pseudoparalysis" when presented with clinical cases and assess clinical agreement on the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis. METHODS: Fifteen expert shoulder surgeons were surveyed regarding 18 patients with magnetic resonance imaging-diagnosed massive rotator cuff tears, restricted active range of motion (ROM), full passive ROM, and without advanced rotator cuff arthropathy (Hamada grade <3). The survey included 18 patient vignettes with key clinical details and a deidentified video demonstrating the physical examination of the patient. For all patients, surgeons were instructed to assume that the patient has a full passive ROM. An anteroposterior radiograph and T2 sequences of the patient's coronal, axial, and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging were also provided. After each case, the surgeons were asked: (1) does the patient have pseudoparalysis, and (2) if so, how severe it is. At the end of the patient vignettes, surgeons were asked to define pseudoparalysis using a checklist with predefined options. Surgeons were also asked if there was a difference between the term pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis. Fleiss' kappa (κ) correlation coefficient was used to determine intersurgeon agreement. RESULTS: There was minimal inter-rater agreement on the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis (κ = 0.360) and no agreement on describing the severity of pseudoparalysis (κ = -0.057). Although 80% of surgeons stated that an active glenohumeral elevation less than 90° was a diagnostic feature of pseudoparalysis, there was disagreement on the remaining criteria, leading to no agreement on a set of universal criteria that defines pseudoparalysis. A total of 67% included maintained full passive elevation, 33% included the absence of pain, 67% included elevation causing anterosuperior escape, and 27% included an additional unlisted factor. There was minimal agreement among the 15 surgeons on the diagnostic criteria of pseudoparalysis (κ = 0.092). Finally, 7 surgeons stated that pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are identical, whereas 8 surgeons stated that they are 2 different clinical diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Among this panel of expert shoulder surgeons, there was a lack of consensus on the definition of pseudoparalysis and minimal agreement on the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis based on clinical scenarios. In addition, half the surgeons believed that pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are identical, whereas the other half believed that they represent 2 separate clinical entities. A standardized definition of pseudoparalysis would be of value to facilitate communication and research efforts.

Analysis of abduction moment arms after rotator cuff tear and acellular dermal matrix allograft reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical testing of abduction moment arms presents a useful method to assess the contributions of individual rotator cuff muscles to glenohumeral function. This study aimed to investigate the changes in abduction moment arms after the treatment of supraspinatus tears with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR), and a combined SCR-BAR procedure, all with human dermal allograft. METHODS: We tested 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens under 6 conditions: (1) intact, (2) 50% supraspinatus tear (partial tear), (3) 100% supraspinatus tear, (4) SCR, (5) SCR combined with BAR, and (6) BAR. In each condition, the moment arms for the individual muscles of the teres minor, subscapularis, and infraspinatus were calculated throughout 90° of abduction using a motion capture system. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey testing were performed to determine significance. RESULTS: In the teres minor, the moment arms in the SCR (11.9 mm), BAR (10.1 mm), and SCR-BAR (11.9 mm) conditions were greater than those in the intact (8.5 mm; P = .001, P = .001, and P = .001, respectively), partial tear (9.1 mm; P = .001, P = .128, and P = .001, respectively), and complete tear (8.8 mm; P = .001, P = .011, and P = .001, respectively) conditions. Similarly, in the subscapularis, the moment arms in the SCR (13.4 mm), BAR (13.8 mm), and SCR-BAR (13.5 mm) conditions were greater than those in the intact (10.6 mm; P = .006, P = .001, and P = .003, respectively) and partial tear (10.4 mm; P = .006, P = .001, and P = .003, respectively) conditions. In the teres minor, the SCR (11.9 mm) and SCR-BAR (11.9 mm) conditions were also found to have significantly increased moment arms compared with the BAR condition (10.1 mm; P = .001 and P = .001, respectively). In the infraspinatus, the BAR condition (13.8 mm) was found to have a significantly decreased moment arm compared with the partial tear condition (15.8 mm, P = .026), with no other significant findings between conditions. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the moment arm contributions of the individual muscles comprising the rotator cuff can change after reconstruction to compensate for tears. SCR and SCR-BAR increase the moment arms in the teres minor and subscapularis, potentially allowing for increased abduction ability.

Early postoperative recovery comparisons of superior capsule reconstruction to tendon transfers.

BACKGROUND: The management of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is controversial, with no gold standard. Two recently developed techniques that have shown promising initial results include arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and tendon transfers (latissimus or lower trapezius). However, there remains a scarcity of studies examining each procedure's early postoperative clinical outcomes individually or in comparison to each other. The purpose of this study is to compare the early postoperative recovery outcomes of tendon transfers (TTs) to SCR. METHODS: Using the surgical outcomes system global database (Arthrex Inc.), we assessed the postoperative recovery outcomes for all patients who had outcomes recorded at least 6 months after SCR or TT. The time points analyzed included preoperative and postoperative (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). The outcomes analyzed included pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, VR-12 physical, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). RESULTS: Overall, 163 patients underwent SCR and 24 arthroscopically assisted TT. The mean age for SCR and TT was 60 and 56 years, respectively. Postoperative recovery curves demonstrate that both procedures produced improved outcomes at each postoperative time point compared to preoperative. The pain and functional outcomes measures, including VAS, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 physical, were comparable for TT and SCRs, with similar recovery curves between the 2 techniques. Ultimately at 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 2 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the early outcomes associated with arthroscopic treatment of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears demonstrated that the arthroscopically assisted tendon transfers and arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction had similar pain and functional outcomes throughout the 2-year postoperative recovery period. Overall, the process of recovery appears equivalent between the 2 techniques. Future studies are needed to assess the outcomes of each technique and specific indications in an attempt to delineate an algorithm for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Better functional outcomes and a lower infection rate can be expected after superior capsular reconstruction in comparison with latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, if left untreated, may result in cuff tear arthropathy, which causes shoulder disability and pain. The primary outcome of this systematic review was to evaluate differences in functional outcomes between the arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without arthritis. The secondary outcome was to compare complication and reoperation rates between the 2 surgical procedures. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases were searched using keywords, and 20 studies were included in this review. Data extracted for quantitative analysis included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant-Murley score, the subjective shoulder value, the range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, numbers and types of complications, and reoperation rate. The preoperative fatty degeneration of the muscles and the preoperative and follow-up acromiohumeral distance and glenohumeral osteoarthritis according to the Hamada grading system were also reported. RESULTS: A total of 1112 patients were identified, among whom 407 and 399 underwent SCR and LDTT, respectively. The SCR group showed a higher mean age at the time of operation (64.5 ± 7.8 vs. 62.1 ± 8.9 years; P < .001). The SCR group showed a lower rate of previous surgical procedures on the shoulder (35 out of 407 vs. 111 out of 399; P < .001) and a shorter mean follow-up (30.4 ± 7.5 vs. 36.3 ± 10.3 months; P < .001). Patients who underwent SCR reported significantly better functionality and residual pain as measured by the Constant-Murley score (75.5 ± 11.2 vs. 65.6 ± 22.8, P < .001), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (84.3 ± 13 vs. 67.7 ± 23, P < .001), the subjective shoulder value (79.4 ± 13 vs. 64.4 ± 23, P < .001), and the visual analog scale (1.4 ± 2 vs. 2.8 ± 3, P < .001) than patients who underwent LDTT. A greater acromiohumeral distance (5.8 ± 2.5 vs. 7.6 ± 2.7, P < .001) was found in the SCR group. The SCR group showed a significantly lower infection rate (0.2% vs. 2.8%., P = .003) and a higher graft failure rate (12.3% vs. 6.8%, P = .012). No differences in terms of reoperation for graft failure (1% vs. 2.3% for SCR and LDTT, respectively; P = .172) or for conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (1.7% vs. 2% for SCR and LDTT, respectively; P = .800) were found. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing SCR report better functional outcomes and greater acromiohumeral distance than those undergoing LDTT. The LDTT group shows a significantly higher infection rate, while the SCR group shows a significantly higher graft failure rate, but there are no differences in terms of reoperation between the 2 surgical procedures.