Determinants of radiation dose to immune cells during breast radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The immune system has been identified as an organ at risk in esophageal and lung cancers. However, the dosimetric impact of radiotherapy on immune system exposure in patients treated for breast cancer has never been studied. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective dosimetric study included 163 patients treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between 2010 and 2016 with locoregional helical tomotherapy after conservative surgery or total mastectomy. The effective dose to the immune system (EDIC) was calculated based on diverse dosimetric parameters. The clinical and volumetric determinants of EDIC in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer were analyzed. RESULTS: The median EDIC for the population was 4.23 Gy, ranging from 1.82 to 6.19 Gy. Right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation were associated with significantly higher EDIC in univariate (4.38 Gy vs. 3.94 Gy, p < 0.01, and 4.27 Gy vs. 3.44 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). Liver overexposure was the main contributor to EDIC increase in right-sided breast cancer patients (+0.38 Gy [95%CI: +0.30; +0.46]), while the integral total dose increase was the main contributor to EDIC increase in cases of regional node irradiation (+0.63 Gy [95%CI: +0.42; +0.85]). CONCLUSION: The EDIC score during adjuvant radiotherapy after breast cancer was statistically significantly higher in the case of right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation. Liver irradiation is the main contributor to immune system exposure in adjuvant irradiation of right-sided breast cancer. Populations in which an association between EDIC and survival would exist have yet to be identified but could potentially include patients treated for triple-negative breast cancer with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Nested CNN architecture for three-dimensional dose distribution prediction in tomotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of changing network layers to increase the accuracy of dose distribution prediction, instead of expanding their dimensions, which requires complex calculations, has been considered in our study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 137 prostate cancer patients treated with the tomotherapy technique were categorized as 80% training and validating as well as 20% testing for the nested UNet and UNet architectures. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used to measure the dosimetry indices of dose-volume histograms (DVHs), and geometry indices, including the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), were used to evaluate the isodose volume (IV) similarity prediction. To verify a statistically significant difference, the two-way statistical Wilcoxon test was used at a level of 0.05 (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Use of a nested UNet architecture reduced the predicted dose MAE in DVH indices. The MAE for planning target volume (PTV), bladder, rectum, and right and left femur were D98% = 1.11 ± 0.90; D98% = 2.27 ± 2.85, Dmean = 0.84 ± 0.62; D98% = 1.47 ± 12.02, Dmean = 0.77 ± 1.59; D2% = 0.65 ± 0.70, Dmean = 0.96 ± 2.82; and D2% = 1.18 ± 6.65, Dmean = 0.44 ± 1.13, respectively. Additionally, the greatest geometric similarity was observed in the mean SSIM for UNet and nested UNet (0.91 vs. 0.94, respectively). CONCLUSION: The nested UNet network can be considered a suitable network due to its ability to improve the accuracy of dose distribution prediction compared to the UNet network in an acceptable time.

Incorporating intensity modulated total body irradiation into a Children's Oncology Group trial: Rationale, techniques, and safeguards.

Historically, total body irradiation (TBI) has been delivered using static, parallel opposed photon beams (2D-TBI). Recently, centers have increasingly used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques for TBI. Relative to 2D-TBI, IMRT can reduce doses to critical organs (i.e., lungs and kidneys) while delivering myeloablative doses to the rest of the body, so it may decrease the risk of toxicity while maintaining oncologic outcomes. Despite these potential benefits, delivering TBI using IMRT introduces new challenges in treatment planning and delivery. We describe the extensive experience with IMRT-based TBI at Stanford University and City of Hope Cancer Center. These groups, and others, have reported favorable clinical outcomes and have developed methods to optimize treatment planning and delivery. A critical next step is to evaluate the broader adoption of this approach. Therefore, IMRT-based TBI will be incorporated into a prospective, multi-institutional Children's Oncology Group study with careful procedures and safeguards in place.

Nutrition outcomes and treatment toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) provides excellent limitation of dose to tissues not requiring treatment, although acute toxicity still occurs. The present study aimed to determine how treatment-related acute toxicities affect nutrition outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in 194 patients undergoing curative intent H-IMRT with or without other treatment modalities. Weight outcomes (kg) and acute toxicity and dysphagia data were collected during treatment using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), version 4.0. RESULTS: Significant weight loss (> 10%) was observed in 30% of high nutritional risk patients and 7% of low nutritional risk patients. Nausea, adjusted for baseline dysphagia, in high nutritional risk patients and nausea, dysphagia and pharyngeal mucositis in low nutritional risk patients were significant factors in explaining the percentage loss in baseline weight to treatment completion. CONCLUSIONS: Significant weight loss remains an issue during treatment, despite improvements in radiotherapy technology and high-level multidisciplinary care.

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer increase the subsequent risk of bladder cancer? A propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bladder cancer after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer in comparison to the risk post-radical prostatectomy (RP) using propensity score-matched analysis and to assess the risk factors for bladder cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 2067 patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer treated at our institution between June 2007 and December 2016. Of these, 1547 patients were treated with IMRT and 520 underwent RP. The propensity scores were calculated using age, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, prostate volume, Brinkman index, and follow-up time as matched covariates. A propensity score-matched patient cohort (n = 718; IMRT: 359, RP: 359) was created, and the risk of bladder cancer after treatment was compared. RESULTS: In total, bladder cancer was detected in 33 patients. Five patients in the IMRT group and one in the RP group died of bladder cancer. In the propensity score-matched analysis, the 5-year bladder cancer-free survival rate was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the RP group (91.7% and 96.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that IMRT and the Brinkman index were the risk factors for bladder cancer in this cohort (odds ratio = 5.085, 95% confidence interval = 1.436-18.008, p = 0.012 and odds ratio = 1.001, 95% confidence interval = 1.000-1.001, p = 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT for prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy increases the subsequent risk of bladder cancer compared with RP and is an independent risk factor for bladder cancer similar to smoking.

Surface guided ring gantry radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold for breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the use of surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in combination with a tomotherapy treatment mode using discrete delivery angles for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatments of breast cancer (bc). We aimed to assess the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated camera occlusion in the Radixact treatment system bore and the stability of DIBH signals during couch movement. The SGRT system's ability to maintain signal and surface image accuracy was analyzed at different depths within the bore. Dosimetric parameters were compared and measured for 20 left-sided bc patients receiving TomoDirect (TD) tangential radiotherapy in both DIBH and free breathing (FB). RESULTS: The SGRT system maintained surface coverage and precise DIBH-signal at depths up to 40 cm beyond the treatment center. Camera occlusion occurred in the clavicular and neck regions due to the patient's morphology and gantry geometry. Nonetheless, the system accurately detected respiratory motion for all measurements. The DIBH plans significantly (p < 0.001) reduced mean heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) radiation doses by up to 40%, with a 50% reduction in near-maximum heart and LAD doses, respectively. No significant dosimetric differences between DIBH and FB were observed in other investigated parameters and volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Camera occlusion and couch movement minimally impacted the real-time surface image accuracy needed for DIBH treatments of bc. DIBH reduced heart and LAD radiation doses significantly compared to FB, indicating the feasibility and dosimetric benefits of combining these modalities.

Clinical implementation and patient-specific quality assurance solutions for real-time target tracking and dynamic delivery in Radixact synchrony.

BACKGROUND: The installation and testing of the first Radixact with Synchrony system in Colombia marked a significant milestone in Latin America's medical landscape. There was a need to devise a robust quality assurance protocol to comprehensively evaluate both dose delivery and motion tracking accuracy. However, testing experiences under clinical conditions have not been extensively reported. Additionally, there are limited recommended measuring devices for Synchrony evaluation. PURPOSE: To validate and implement an alternative setup for dynamic-PSQA while testing Synchrony's functionality under clinical scenarios, including real-patient motion traces, and to provide guidance to new centers undergoing clinical implementation of Helical Synchrony. METHODS: This approach involves using the Iba miniPhantomR with strategically placed fiducial markers for configuring Gafchromic-films and array-based setups. When paired with the CIRS Dynamic Platform, this enables an innovative dynamic setup with trackable features for Synchrony delivery testing. Assessment scenarios, including compensation (M1S1) and no-motion compensation (M1S0), were evaluated using 2D-gamma pass rate analysis with multiple clinical gamma criteria. The Synchrony-Simulation feature was used to assess pre-treatment performance and capture the patient's target motion pattern. Synchrony for common clinical cases with patient's motion-traces was validated. RESULTS: The results for M1S0 and M1S1 demonstrated consistency with previous studies evaluating Synchrony functionality. Analysis using different gamma criteria unveiled dosimetric differences and impacts across various motion ranges. The application of effective kV-dose subtraction for array-based methods is of upmost importance when evaluating dynamic-PSQA with stringent gamma-criteria. However, no significant kV-dose impact on EBT3-Film was detectable. CONCLUSION: Two implemented configurations for dynamic-PSQA setups were validated and successfully integrated into our clinic. We addressed both the benefits and limitations of array-based and film-based methods. The functionality and limitations of Synchrony were evaluated using the proposed setups. The potential utility of Synchrony-Simulation, along with the proposed patient-case classification table, can offer valuable support for new users during the clinical implementation of Synchrony treatments.

Development of an external system for monitoring the couch speed in radiotherapy using continuous bed movement.

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation before bone marrow transplantation for hematological malignancies using Radixact, a high-precision radiotherapy machine, can potentially reduce side effects and the risk of secondary malignancies. However, stable control of couch speed is critical, and direct assessment methods outlined in quality assurance guidelines are lacking. This study aims to develop a real-time couch speed verification system for the Radixact. METHODS: The developed system used a linear encoder to measure couch speed directly. Accuracy was verified via a linear stage, comparing measurements with a laser distance sensor. After placing a phantom simulating the human body on the Radixact couch, the couch speed was verified using predefined speed plans. RESULTS: Operating the linear stage at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mm/s revealed that the maximum position error of the developed verification system compared to the laser distance sensor was nearly equivalent to the distance resolution of the system (0.05 mm/pulse), with negligible average speed error. When the Radixact couch operated at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mm/s, the values obtained by the verification system agreed with the theoretical values within the sampling period (0.01 s) and distance resolution (0.05 mm). CONCLUSION: The verification system developed provides real-time monitoring of the speed of the Radixact table, ensuring treatment effectiveness and patient safety. It would guarantee the couch speed's soundness and contribute to the "visualization" of safety.

Performance of binary MLC using real-time optical sensor feedback system.

The Radixact system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is the latest platform release based on the TomoTherapy technology. The most recent system does not apply a leaf latency model correction after plan optimization to ensure the correct MLC leaf-open time (LOT) agreement between the TPS and machine delivery. The MLC uses optical sensors to measure the delivered LOTs in real-time and individual leaf-specific latency corrections are made to ensure agreement. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Radixact MLC with leaf-specific latency correction using the optical sensor's real-time feedback. Specifically, the study statistically evaluated the MLC LOT errors observed from 290 plan-specific quality assurance (PSQA) measurements. Repeatability testing was performed to quantify the uncertainty in the MLC feedback system delivery by analyzing > 1300 delivered treatment fractions throughout the course of radiotherapy. The clinical impact was evaluated by estimating the resulting dose difference in the patient targets due to the measured plan latencies. Our study measured an average plan latency equal to 2.0 ± 0.4 ms (0.6% ± 0.2%) for 290 PSQAs. Repeatability tests showed a mean standard deviation in plan latencies measuring 0.05 ms (0.02%). The deviation from the TPS in the mean target dose due to the plan latencies was estimated to be 0.0% ± 0.2% (range: -0.7%-1.1%). The current MLC system with real-time optical sensor feedback is capable of accurately delivering the TPS-generated sinograms. Repeatability test results showed that the system allows for high reliability in daily sinogram delivery. The MLC latency deviations were shown to have minimal clinical impact on the overall target dosimetry.

Investigation on the accuracy of field widths and the quantitative relationship with energy variations for dynamic jaws helical tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: TomoEDGE is an advanced technology for TomoTherapy treatment delivery by introducing a sliding-window dynamic jaw motion. The front and back jaws move independently at the start and end of a target volume along the longitudinal couch direction to reduce the undesired dose to the normal tissues. The accuracy of field width is essential to treatment delivery in this regard. The purpose of this work was to analyze the performance of dynamic jaws on helical tomotherapy and investigate the relationship with energy variation. METHODS: The Tomotherapy-Quality-Assurance (TQA) Dynamic Field Width procedure was performed monthly across three tomotherapy machines. All field widths were analyzed, especially the FWHM of the 10 mm field width. Field width measurements were compared with the ratio of Percentage Depth Dose at 20 and 10 cm to render the value of correlation. Changes in beam FWHM and energy were further discussed. Two-year data were collected for this purpose. RESULTS: On average, measured field widths in each unit agreed within 1% tolerance recommendation stated. The average absolute difference between reference and measured FWs in each unit was approximately 0.07 mm. An increase of 1.5% in the FW of the 10 mm nominal beam width was correlated with a 1% increase in PDD20,10 ratio, implying a positive correlation between the two factors (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A positive correlation between nominal 10 mm FW and PDD20,10 was observed. In the case that the PDD20,10 marginally passes the QA tests, users are recommended to consider further verification on Dynamic Jaws to ensure the smallest field width to be within tolerance, which is essential to maintain effective treatment in TomoEDGE system. Since the regression of this study was a single-factor model, other confounding factors such as the focal spot size of linear accelerator should also be considered when evaluating the machine status.

Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to discuss the dosimetric advantages of helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technology in hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy and provide references for clinical selection of ideal radiotherapy technology. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy were chosen randomly. Computed tomography (CT) and MRI scanning images were input into the treatment planning system (TPS). After the CT and enhanced magnetic resonance T1 weighted images were fused and registered, the same radiation therapy physician was invited to outline the tumor target volume. PTV-HS refers to the whole brain subtracted by 5 mm outward expansion of the hippocampus (HP). The prescribed dose was 30 Gy/10 fractions. HT and VMAT plans were designed for each patient in accordance with PTV. Under the premise that the 95% isodose curve covers the PTV, dose-volume histogram was applied to evaluate the PTV, conformal index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), maximum dose (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), minimum dose (Dmin) and absorbed doses of organs at risk (OARs) in HT and VMAT plans. Paired t-test was performed to compare the differences between two radiation therapy plans, and p  <  0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: These two plans had no significant difference in PTV-HS (max, min, and mean). However, the HI and CI of the HT plan were significantly better than those of the VMAT plan, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was significantly superior to the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax, Dmin, and Dmean of HP, left and right eye lens, left and right eye, and spinal cord, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was also better than the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax of the left optic nerve. However, the two plans showed no obvious differences in terms of the absorbed doses of the right optic nerve and brainstem, without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the VMAT plan of hippocampal avoidance, HT technology has significant dosimetric advantages. HT plans significantly decreased the radiation dose and radiation volume of OARs surrounding the target area (e.g., surrounding eye lens and eye, especially hippocampal avoidance area) while increasing the CI and HI of PTV dose in whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) greatly, thus enabling the decrease in the incidence rate of radioactive nerve function impairment.

Dosimetric evaluation in Helical TomoTherapy for lung SBRT using Monte Carlo-based independent dose verification software.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the dosimetric errors caused by a model-based algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with Helical TomoTherapy (HT) using Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose verification software. METHODS: For 38 plans of lung SBRT, the dose calculation accuracy of a treatment planning system (TPS) of HT was compared with the results of DoseCHECK, the commercial MC-based independent verification software. The following indices were extracted to evaluate the correlation of dosimetric errors: (1) target volume, (2) average computed tomography (CT) value of the planning target volume (PTV) margin, and (3) average CT value of surrounding 2-mm area of the PTV (PTV ring). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses determined the threshold for 5% of differences in PTV D95%. Then, the 38 plans were classified into two groups using the cutoff values of ROC analysis for these three indices. Dosimetric differences between groups were statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: TPS of HT overestimated by more than 5% in the PTV D95% in 16 of 38 plans. The PTV ring showed the strongest correlation with dosimetric differences. The cutoff value for the target volume, the PTV margin, and the PTV ring was 14.7 cc, -754 HU, and -708 HU, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for the target volume, the PTV margin, and the PTV ring were 0.835, 0.878, and 0.932, respectively. Dosimetric errors more than 5% were observed when the PTV volume was less than 15 cc or when the CT value around the target was less than -700 HU. CONCLUSION: The TPS of HT might overestimate the PTV dose by more than 5% if any the three indices in this study were below threshold. Therefore, independent verification with an MC-based algorithm should be strongly recommended for lung SBRT in HT.

Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units.

BACKGROUND: Treatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom-based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re-contouring as well as plan re-optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom-based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries. PURPOSE: To provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units. METHODS: Two methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build-in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units. RESULTS: The study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in-phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units. CONCLUSIONS: The two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Helical TomoTherapy Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Kidney Transplant Tolerance in Rhesus Macaques.

Development of a post-transplant kidney transplant tolerance induction protocol involving a novel total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) conditioning method in a rhesus macaque model is described. We examined the feasibility of acheiving tolerance to MHC 1-haplotype matched kidney transplants by establishing a mixed chimeric state with infusion of donor hematopoietic cells (HC) using TomoTherapy TLI. The chimeric state was hypothesized to permit the elimination of all immunosuppressive (IS) medications while preserving allograft function long-term without development of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) or rejection. An experimental group of 11 renal transplant recipients received the tolerance induction protocol and outcomes were compared to a control group (n = 7) that received the same conditioning but without donor HC infusion. Development of mixed chimerism and operational tolerance was accomplished in two recipients in the experimental group. Both recipients were withdrawn from all IS and continued to maintain normal renal allograft function for 4 years without rejection or GVHD. None of the animals in the control group achieved tolerance when IS was eliminated. This novel experimental model demonstrated the feasibility for inducing of long-term operational tolerance when mixed chimerism is achieved using a TLI post-transplant conditioning protocol in 1-haplotype matched non-human primate recipients of combined kidney and HC transplantation.

Investigation of total skin helical tomotherapy using a 3D-printed total skin bolus.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of using a 3D-printed total skin bolus in total skin helical tomotherapy for the treatment of mycosis fungoides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 65-year-old female patient with a 3-year history of mycosis fungoides underwent treatment using an in-house desktop fused deposition modelling printer to create a total skin bolus made of a 5-mm-thick flexible material, which increased the skin dose through dose building. The patient's scan was segmented into upper and lower sections, with the division line placed 10 cm above the patella. The prescription was to deliver 24 Gy over 24 fractions, given 5 times per week. The plan parameters consisted of a field width of 5 cm, pitch of 0.287 and modulation factor of 3. The complete block was placed 4 cm away from the planned target region to reduce the area of the internal organs at risk, especially the bone marrow. Dose delivery accuracy was verified using point dose verification with a "Cheese" phantom (Gammex RMI, Middleton, WI), 3D plane dose verification with ArcCHECK (Model 1220, Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL), and multipoint film dose verification. Megavoltage computed tomography guidance was also utilized to ensure the accuracy of the setup and treatment. RESULTS: A 5-mm-thick 3D-printed suit was used as a bolus to achieve a target volume coverage of 95% of the prescribed dose. The conformity index and homogeneity index of the lower segment were slightly better than those of the upper segment. As the distance from the skin increased, the dose to the bone marrow gradually decreased, and the dose to other organs at risk remained within clinical requirements. The point dose verification deviation was less than 1%, the 3D plane dose verification was greater than 90%, and the multipoint film dose verification was less than 3%, all of which confirmed the accuracy of the delivered dose. The total treatment time was approximately 1.5 h, which included 0.5 h of wearing the 3D-printed suit and 1 h with the beam on. Patients only experienced mild fatigue, nausea or vomiting, low-grade fever, and grade III bone marrow suppression. CONCLUSION: The use of a 3D-printed suit for total skin helical tomotherapy can result in a uniform dose distribution, short treatment time, simple implementation process, good clinical outcomes, and low toxicity. This study presents an alternative treatment approach that can potentially yield improved clinical outcomes for mycosis fungoides.

Optimal threshold of a control parameter for tomotherapy respiratory tracking: A phantom study.

BACKGROUND: Radixact Synchrony® , a real-time motion tracking and compensating modality, is used for helical tomotherapy. Control parameters are used for the accurate application of irradiation. Radixact Synchrony® uses the potential difference, which is an index of the accuracy of the prediction model of target motion and is represented by a statistical prediction of the 3D distance error. Although there are several reports on Radixact Synchrony® , few have reported the appropriate settings of the potential difference threshold. PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the optimal threshold of the potential difference of Radixact Synchrony® during respiratory tumor-motion-tracking irradiation. METHODS: The relationship among the dosimetric accuracy, motion tracking accuracy, and control parameter was evaluated using a moving platform, a phantom with a basic respiratory model (the fourth power of a sinusoidal wave), and several irregular respiratory model waveforms. The dosimetric accuracy was evaluated by gamma analysis (3%, 1 mm, 10% dose threshold). The tracking accuracy was measured by the distance error of the difference between the tracked and driven positions of the phantom. The largest potential difference for 95% of treatment time was evaluated, and its correlation with the gamma-pass ratio and distance error was investigated. The optimal threshold of the potential difference was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A linear correlation was identified between the potential difference and the gamma-pass ratio (R = -0.704). A linear correlation was also identified between the potential difference and distance error (R = 0.827). However, as the potential difference increased, it tended to underestimate the distance error. The ROC analysis revealed that the appropriate cutoff value of the potential difference was 3.05 mm. CONCLUSION: The irradiation accuracy with motion tracking by Radixact Synchrony® could be predicted from the potential difference, and the threshold of the potential difference should be set to ∼3 mm.

Quantitative assessment of helical tomotherapy plans complexity.

PURPOSE: An unnecessary amount of complexity in radiotherapy plans affects the efficiency of the treatments, increasing the uncertainty of dose deposition and its susceptibility to anatomical changes or setup errors. To date, tools for quantitatively assessing the complexity of tomotherapy plans are still limited. In this study, new metrics were developed to characterize different aspects of helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, and their actual effectiveness was investigated. METHODS: The complexity of 464 HT plans delivered on a Radixact platform was evaluated. A new set of metrics was devised to assess beam geometry, leaf opening time (LOT) variability, and modulation over space and time. Sixty-five complexity metrics were extracted from the dataset using the newly in-house developed software library TCoMX: 29 metrics already proposed in the literature and 36 newly developed metrics. Their reciprocal relation is discussed. Their effectiveness was evaluated through correlation analyses with patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results. RESULTS: An inverse linear relation was found between the average number of closed leaves and the average number of MLC openings and closures as well as between the choice of the modulation factor and the discontinuity of the field, suggesting some intrinsic link between the LOT distribution and the geometrical complexity of the MLC openings. The newly proposed metrics were at least as correlated as the existing ones to the PSQA results. Metrics describing the geometrical complexity of the MLC openings showed the strongest connection to the PSQA results. Significant correlations were found between at least one of the new metrics and the γ index passing rate P R γ % ( 3 % G , 2 mm ) $P{R}_{\gamma}\%(3\%G,2\textit{mm})$ for six out of seven groups of plans considered. CONCLUSION: The new metrics proposed were shown to be effective to characterize more comprehensively the complexity of HT plans. A software library for their automatic extraction is described and made available.

Verification of patient-setup accuracy using a surface imaging system with steep measurement angle.

PURPOSE: We evaluate an SGRT device (Voxelan HEV-600 M/RMS) installed with Radixact, with the view angle of the Voxelan's camera at 74 degrees. The accuracy of Voxelan with this steep angle was evaluated with phantom experiments and inter-fractional setup errors of patients. METHODS: In the phantom experiments, the difference between the measured values of Voxelan from the truth was evaluated for translations and rotations. The inter-fractional setup error between the setup using skin markers with laser localizer (laser setup: LS) and the setup using Voxelan (surface setup: SS) was compared for head and neck (N = 19), chest (N = 7) and pelvis (N = 9) cases. The inter-fractional setup error was calculated by subtracting from bone matching by megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) as ground truth. RESULTS: From the phantom experiments, the average difference between the measured values of Voxelan from the truth was within 1 mm and 1 degree. In all cases, inter-fractional setup error based on MVCT was not significantly different between LS and SS by Welch's t-test (P > 0.05). The vector offset of the LS for head and neck, chest, and pelvis were 6.5, 9.6, and 9.6 mm, respectively, and that of the SS were 5.8, 8.6, and 12.6 mm, respectively. Slight improvement was observed for the head and neck, and chest cases, however, pelvis cases were not improved because the umbilical region could not be clearly visualized as a reference. CONCLUSION: The results show that SS in Voxelan with an installation angle of 74 degrees is equal to or better than LS.

Influence of different air CT numbers for IVDT on the dose distribution in TomoTherapy MVCT.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of different air computed tomography (CT) numbers of the image value density table (IVDT) on the retrospective dose calculation of head-and-neck (HN) radiotherapy using TomoTherapy megavoltage CT (MVCT) images. The CT numbers of the inside and outside air and each tissue-equivalent plug of the "Cheese" phantom were obtained from TomoTherapy MVCT. Two IVDTs with different air CT numbers were created and applied to MVCT images of the HN anthropomorphic phantom and recalculated by Planned Adaptive to verify dose distribution. We defined the recalculation dose with MVCT images using both inside and outside air of the IVDT as IVDT MVCT inair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{inair}}$ and IVDT MVCT outair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{outair}}$ , respectively. Treatment planning doses calculated on kVCT images were compared with those calculated on MVCT images using two different IVDT tables, namely, IVDT MVCT inair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{inair}}$ and IVDT MVCT outair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{outair}}$ . The difference between average MVCT numbers ±1 standard deviation on inside and outside air of the calibration phantom was 65 ± 36 HU. This difference in MVCT number of air exceeded the recommendation lung tolerance for dose calculation error of 2%. The dose differences between the planning target volume (PTV): D98% , D50% , D2% and the organ at risk (OAR): Dmax , Dmean recalculated by IVDT MVCT inair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{inair}}$ and IVDT MVCT outair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{outair}}$ using MVCT images were a maximum of 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively. Recalculated doses to the PTV and OAR with MVCT showed that IVDT MVCT outair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{outair}}$ was 0.5%-0.7% closer to the kVCT treatment planning dose than IVDT MVCT inair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{inair}}$ . This study showed that IVDT MVCT outair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{outair}}$ was more accurate than IVDT MVCT inair ${\mathrm{IVDT}}_{\mathrm{MVCT}}^{\mathrm{inair}}$ in recalculating the dose HN cases of MVCT using TomoTherapy.

Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Geometrical uncertainties in patients can severely affect the quality of radiotherapy. PURPOSE: We evaluated the dosimetric efficacy of robust optimization for helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning in the presence of patient setup uncertainty and anatomical changes. METHODS: Two helical IMRT plans for 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were created using either minimax robust optimization (robust plan) or a conventional planning target volume (PTV) margin approach (PTV plan). Plan robustness was evaluated by creating perturbed dose plans with setup uncertainty from isocenter shifts and anatomical changes due to organ variation. The magnitudes of the geometrical uncertainties were based on the patient setup uncertainty considered during robust optimization, which was identical to the PTV margin. The homogeneity index, and target coverage (TC, defined as the V100% of the clinical target volume), and organs at risk (OAR; rectum and bladder) doses were analyzed for all nominal and perturbed plans. A statistical t-test was performed to evaluate the differences between the robust and PTV plans. RESULTS: Comparison of the nominal plans showed that the robust plans had lower OAR doses and a worse homogeneity index and TC than the PTV plans. The evaluations of robustness that considered setup errors more than the PTV margin demonstrated that the worst-case perturbed scenarios for robust plans had significantly higher TC while maintaining lower OAR doses. However, when anatomical changes were considered, improvement in TC from robust optimization was not observed in the worst-case perturbed plans. CONCLUSIONS: For helical IMRT planning in localized prostate cancer, robust optimization provides benefits over PTV margin-based planning, including better OAR sparing, and increased robustness against systematic patient-setup errors.