Oncologic safety of transverse colon cancer surgery without central vessel ligation of middle colic artery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical standardization for transverse colon cancers (TCC) has not been established, and the oncologic benefit of central vessel ligation (CVL) are still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic safety of TCC surgery without CVL of the middle colic artery (MCA). METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational, comparative study. The clinical, surgical, and pathological characteristics of the patients who underwent radical surgery for non-metastatic TCC between January 2012 and December 2020 were investigated, and the characteristic and oncologic outcomes of No CVL and CVL groups were compared. RESULTS: The number of No CVL and CVL groups was 47 (44.3%) and 59 (55.7%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in surgical complications, stage, mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (LN) (24.12 vs. 22.36 p = 0.464), mean number of metastatic LN (1.53 vs. 0.74, p = 0.163), mean proximal margin (19.2 cm vs. 16.7 cm, p = 0.139), mean distal margin (9.6 cm vs. 9.9 cm, p = 0.753), adjuvant chemotherapy, total recurrence rate (6.4 vs. 11.9%, p = 0.507), lymphatic recurrence rate (0.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.253), and local recurrence rate (2.1 vs. 1.7%, p = 0.984). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage II (DFS: 94.4 vs. 91.3%, p = 0.685, OS: 94.1 vs. 95.5%, p = 0.838) and stage III (DFS: 88.5 vs. 68.4%, p = 0.253, OS: 100.0% vs. 79.7, p = 0.328). CONCLUSION: TCC surgery without CVL of the MCA showed comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes compared to surgery with CVL. Therefore, preservation of a branch of the MCA may be considered a safe option, when combined with adequate lymph node dissection, if necessary. A large, prospective, and controlled study will be necessary to provide solid evidence of the oncologic safety of this procedure.

Optimal surgical approach for mid-transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of cancer colon has increased dramatically. In addition, the database lacks a review to analyze the outcomes of surgeries for mid-transverse colon cancer with several recent controversial studies. We aimed to compare the outcomes of extended hemicolectomy versus transverse colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer. METHOD: PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to 1 December 2022 and a systematic review and meta-analysis were done to detect. RESULTS: According to eligibility criteria, 8 studies (2237 patients) were included in our study. The pooled results of the included studies showed no difference in the 5-year OS, 3-year DFS and 5-year DFS between the two types of surgery (5-year OS, RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.39, P = 0.17), (3-year OS, RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.06, P = 0.42) and (5-year DFS, RR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.91-1.62, P = 0.20). In addition to that, the recurrence rate and the incidence of complications were similar in the two groups (Recurrence rate, RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.62-1.89, P = 0.79) and (Complications, RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.74-1.54, P = 0.72). However, the number of LN harvest and the time of the operation were more in case of extended hemicolectomy. CONCLUSION: Despite harvesting less LN, transverse colectomy has similar oncological outcomes to extended hemicolectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer. In addition to that, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two surgeries.

Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and open colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare laparoscopic with open resection for transverse colon cancer (TCC) regarding long-term survival outcomes. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing laparoscopic with open resection for TCC. The last search was performed on October 7, 2022. Oncological and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3). RESULTS: This study included fifteen studies published between 2014 and 2022 with 2556 patients in total. When compared with the laparoscopic group, the open group had significantly more tumors locating on middle transverse colon (P = 0.006, OR = 0.67, 95%CI [0.50, 0.89], I2 = 12%) and more patients received transverse colectomy (P = 0.03, OR = 0.66, 95%CI [0.46, 0.96], I2 = 53%) as results. Comparable tumor stage (P = 0.13, OR = 0.81, 95%CI [0.62, 1.06], I2 = 55%) and number of lymph node harvested (P = 0.22, WMD = -0.81, 95%CI [-2.09, 0.47], I2 = 73%) were observed between the two groups. As for survival outcomes, no significant difference was observed between the two groups for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.61, OR = 0.93, 95%CI [0.72, 1.21], I2 = 0%), 5-year overall survival (OS; P = 0.83, OR = 0.97, 95%CI [0.71, 1.32], I2 = 0%), 3-year DFS (P = 0.97, OR = 0.96, 95%CI [0.69, 1.32], I2 = 0%), and 3-year OS (P = 0.67, OR = 0.92, 95%CI [0.63, 1.35], I2 = 0%). In the subgroup analysis according to tumor stage, the results did not change. CONCLUSION: Current evidence based on studies demonstrated that laparoscopic procedure could be safely performed for TCC, and it would not affect the long-term survival. Randomized clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted in the future for further investigation.

Segmental or right hemi-colectomy? The optimal surgical procedure for transverse colon cancer: a propensity score-matched, multicenter, retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Extended colectomy is sometimes chosen for treatment of transverse colon cancer (TCC) because of concerns about short- and long-term outcomes. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the optimal surgical procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analyzed data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of pathological stage II/III TCC at four hospitals from January 2011 to June 2019. We excluded the patients with TCC located at distal transverse colon, and just evaluated and analyzed proximal and middle third TCC. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses was used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between patients who underwent segmental transverse colectomy (STC) and those who underwent right hemicolectomy (RHC). RESULTS: In total, 106 patients were enrolled in this study (STC group, n = 45; RHC group, n = 61). The patients' backgrounds were well balanced after matching. The incidence of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) was not significantly different between the STC and RHC groups (4.5% vs. 5.6%, respectively; P = 0.53). The 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were not significantly different between the STC and RHC groups (88.2% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.86 and 90.3% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: RHC has no significant benefits over STC with respect to either short- or long-term outcomes. STC with necessary lymphadenectomy could be an optimal procedure for proximal and middle TCC.

Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a Japanese multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer (TCC) can be technically demanding due to the anatomical complexity of the region. In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS in facilitating this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for TCC between April 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (surgery performed by an ESSQS-qualified surgeon, n = 52) and a non ESSQS-qualified surgeon (surgery performed by a non ESSQS-unqualified surgeon, n = 84). Clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (27.2%). The proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications was lower in the ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (8.0%) than that in the non ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (34.5%; p < 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed "Operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeon surgeon" (odds ratio (OR) 0.360, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.140-0.924; p = 0.033), blood loss (OR 4.146, 95% CI 1.688-10.184; p = 0.002), and clinical N status (OR 4.563, 95% CI 1.814-11.474; p = 0.001) as factors independently associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and revealed that ESSQS-qualified surgeon achieved better surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic radical transverse colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: A novel natural orifice specimen extraction procedure: A case report.

Transverse colon cancer accounts for about 10% of all colonic cancers. The resection of cancers in the transverse colon is technically more challenging, compared with other cancer locations in the colon because the variable anatomy of the middle colic vessels demands excellent surgical skills and the anatomical location of the transverse colon is related to major organs. We report a novel laparoscopic technique for the first time used in surgery of transverse colon cancer which combines a total intracorporeal anastomosis with natural orifice specimen extraction to solve the problems of traditional laparoscopic surgery. A 48-year-old male patient, whose diagnosis was transverse colon adenocarcinoma, was admitted to the hospital. The surgery was performed in accordance with the procedure of totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and the specimen was extracted by opening the rectum. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery has many advantages, including less pain, better cosmesis and minimising risks of complications and also has comparable long-term outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for splenic flexure colon cancer: short- and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) for colon cancer is an essential procedure for improved oncologic outcomes after surgery. Laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer was recently adopted due to a greater understanding of surgical anatomy and improvements in surgical techniques and innovative surgical devices. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with splenic flexure colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic CME with CVL at our institution between January 2005 and December 2017. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (4.8%) were enrolled in this study. Laparoscopic CME with CVL was successfully performed in all patients. The median operative time was 178 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 20 g. Perioperative complications developed in 6 patients (13.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. According to the pathological report, the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15, and lymph node metastasis developed in 14 patients (31.1%). No metastasis was observed at the root of the middle colic artery or the inferior mesenteric artery. The median follow-up period was 49 months. The cumulative 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 85.9% and 84.7%, respectively. The cancer-specific survival rate in stage I-III patients was 92.7%. Recurrence was observed in 5 patients (11.1%), including three patients with peritoneal dissemination and two patients with distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CME with CVL for splenic flexure colon cancer appears to be oncologically safe and feasible based on the short- and long-term outcomes in our study. However, it is careful to introduce this procedure to necessitate the anatomical understandings and surgeon's skill. The appropriate indications must be established with more case registries because our experience is limited.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with extracorporeal anastomosis for transverse colon cancer: comparison of triangulating anastomosis with functional end-to-end anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: We compared triangulating anastomosis (TRI) with functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) in terms of patient demographics, clinicopathological features, and short- and long-term outcomes in this study. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2016, 315 patients with transverse colon cancer underwent laparoscopic resection. TRI was performed in 62 patients and FEEA in 253 patients. Patients with another concomitant cancer, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and/or who underwent another operation at the same time were excluded. RESULTS: The patients' backgrounds were comparable in each group. Transverse colectomy was selected more frequently in TRI and right hemicolectomy in FEEA. The operation time was shorter in TRI. The rate of anastomotic leakage was comparable (1.6% in TRI vs. 0.8% in FEEA). Stricture was more common in TRI (8.1% vs. 0%) and bleeding was more common in FEEA (1.6% vs. 10.6%). The rate of long-term complications was comparable in each group. Overall survival of stage 0-III patients was comparable in each group (94.7% in TRI vs. 93.7% in FEEA). 5-year disease-free survival of stage 0-III, stage II, and stage III patients was also comparable in each group (94.8% vs. 93.0%, 100% vs. 92.1%, and 80.3% vs. 79.2% in TRI and FEEA, respectively). CONCLUSION: The short- and long-term outcome rates were acceptable in both groups. Specific attempts to prevent complications are required for each anastomotic procedure.

Index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection for stage I-III transverse colon cancer: an analysis of the JSCCR database.

PURPOSE: Main lymph node metastasis (LNM) dissection of transverse colon (TC) cancer is a difficult surgical procedure. Nonetheless, the main LNM ratio and the benefit of main lymph node (LN) dissection in TC cancer were unclear. This study aimed to identify high-risk patients for LNM and to evaluate the benefit of LN dissection in TC cancer. METHODS: Data for 26,552 colorectal cancer patients between 2007 and 2011 were obtained from the JSCCR database. Of these, 871 stage I-III TC cancer patients underwent surgery with radical LN dissection. These patients were evaluated using the index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD), where IEBLD = (LNM ratio of each LN station) × (5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the patients with LNM) × 100. RESULTS: None of the patients with depth of invasion pT1-2 had main LNM. The presence of main LNM was associated with depth of invasion pT4, CEA-4H (carcinoembryonic antigen 4 times higher than preoperative cutoff value), or type 3, and 323 patients (37.1%) who had these factors were high-risk patients for main LNM. In these high-risk patients, the LNM ratio, 5-year OS rate of patients with LNM and IEBLD values, respectively, were 43.9%, 70.3%, and 30.5 for the pericolic LN; 20.3%, 66.0%, and 15.1 for the intermediate LN; and 9.6%, 58.5%, and 5.6 for the main LN. CONCLUSION: Main LNM is associated with depth of invasion pT4, CEA-4H, or type 3. The IEBLD for the main LN of high-risk TC cancer patients was over 5.

Laparoscopic segmental colectomy with extensive D3 lymph node dissection: a good choice for right transverse colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous research was yet to establish a definite operation for transverse colon cancer (TCC); surgical procedure was often dictated by the surgeon's preference in clinical practice. The main surgical methods could be summarized in two main points: segmental colectomy (transverse colectomy) and right hemicolectomy. METHOD: The first patient was a 78-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with right TCC. Computed tomography revealed a right TCC and a very long transverse colon; laparoscopic exploration revealed an enlarged apical lymph node surrounding the ileocolic vessels. We performed a segmental colectomy with extensive apical lymph node dissection along the superior mesenteric vessels and its main branches for her. To distinguish it from the previous radical operations for TCC, we called this operation a segmental colectomy with extensive D3 lymph node dissection. Then, this surgical intervention was performed on 8 other TCC patients. RESULTS: The total operating time was 158 min. Pathological examination confirmed 2 apical lymph node metastases; among them, one apical lymph node metastasis was in group No.203. For all 9 patients, the median operative time was 160 min (range, 140-185 min), the average number of lymph node retrieval was 30 (range, 25-39), and the average number of apical lymph node (No.203, No.213, and No.223) retrieval was 5.9 (range, 0-11). Because of the preservation of the ileocecal junction and part of the ascending colon, all patients recovered uneventfully after surgery, and long-term diarrhea, water-electrolyte imbalance, and other Clavien-Dindo grade III or greater postoperative complications did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Our procedure combined the advantages of segmental colectomy and right hemicolectomy and gave consideration to oncological and functional outcomes. It may be an optimal choice for TCC patients with a very long transverse colon and preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis.

Oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic colectomy in patients with transverse colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Literature concerning surgical management of transverse colon cancer is scarce, since many key trials excluded transverse colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and oncological outcomes comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic transverse colon cancer resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for transverse colon cancer between December 2005 and July 2021 were included. Data were kept in a prospective database approved by the institutional ethics committee. Primary outcome was overall and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included complications, operative time, length of stay and lymph node harvest. Statistical analysis was corrected for age and tumour localisation. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six (38 robotic, 71 open and 137 laparoscopic resections) were recruited in this study. There were five conversions during laparoscopic procedures. Operative time was significantly shorter in robotic vs laparoscopic procedures (195 vs 238 min, p = 0.005) and length of stay was shorter in robotic vs laparoscopic and open group (7 vs 9 vs 15 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall complications. R0 resections were similar. Lymph node harvest was highest in the robotic group vs. laparoscopic or open (32 vs. 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001). Overall survival was 97%, 85% and 60% (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival was 91%, 78% and 56% (p < 0.001) for the robotic, laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery for transverse colon cancer is safe and offers good clinical and oncological outcomes. Robotic resection is associated with significantly shorter operating times, higher lymph node harvest, lower conversion rate and does not increase morbidity. Differences in disease-free and overall survival should be further explored in randomised controlled trials.

Laparoscopic versus open radical resection for transverse colon cancer: evidence from multi-center databases.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic approach is still a controversy for transverse colon cancer. Our investigation aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical resection for transverse colon cancer based on evidence from multi-center databases. METHODS: 416 patients with transverse colon cancer undergoing radical surgery were analyzed including 181 laparoscopic resections and 235 open resections from January 2004 to May 2017 based on multi-center databases. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: No statistical differences regarding the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups except the procedure type. Compared with open approach, laparoscopic approach was associated with statistically longer operation time (209.96 vs. 173.31 min, P = 0.002), significantly shorter time to soft food intake (4.73 vs. 6.01 days, P = 0.034), and shorter postoperative hospitalization (12.05 vs. 14.44 days, P = 0.001). In terms of oncologic outcomes, laparoscopic resection was correlated with statistically more lymph node retrieval (13.52 vs. 15.91, P = 0.002) and similar 5-year overall survival (91.2% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.356) and disease-free survival (89.6% vs. 86.0%, P = 0.873), compared with open resection. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with transverse colon cancer, laparoscopic approach can achieve several short-term advantages without decreasing long-term oncologic survival.

Application of nano-carbon and titanium clip combined labeling in robot-assisted laparoscopic transverse colon cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic transverse colon tumor surgery requires precise tumor localization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nano-carbon and titanium clip combination labeling methods in robot-assisted transverse colon tumor surgery. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2019, the clinical data of 16 patients who come from FuZhou, China underwent preoperative nano-carbon and titanium clip combined with robot-assisted laparoscopic transverse colon cancer surgery were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients, no signs of abdominal pain, fever, or diarrhea were observed after colonoscopy. Two titanium clips were seen on all of the 16 patients' abdominal plain films. Nano-carbon staining sites were observed during the operation, and no staining disappeared or abdominal cavity contamination. All patients underwent R0 resection. The average number of lymph nodes harvsted was 18.23 ± 5.04 (range, 9-32). The average time to locate the lesion under the laparoscopic was 3.03 ± 1.26 min (range, 1-6 min), and the average operation time was 321.43 ± 49.23 min (range, 240-400 min). All were consistent with the surgical plan, and there was no intraoperative change of surgical procedure or conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSION: Preoperative colonoscopy combined with nano-carbon and titanium clip is safe and effective in robot-assisted transverse colon cancer surgery. A At the same time, the labeling method shows potential in shortening the operation time, ensuring sufficient safety margin and reducing complications.

Does transverse colon cancer spread to the extramesocolic lymph node stations?

BACKGROUND: Transverse colon cancers show behavioral differences in terms of the involvement of extramesocolic lymph nodes since they are closely related to all three embryological planes. These tumors have also been observed in the gastroepiploic-omental (GEOM) region, outside their usual regional areas. We will evaluate this new metastatic route in our own cases. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (16 female, 18 male) that presented to our clinic with hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and splenic flexure cancer between October 2011 and May 2017 were included in the study. Type of surgery, histopathology, and factors causing metastasis, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Cancer was located in the transverse colon in 20 patients (58.8%), hepatic flexure in 10 (29.4%), and splenic flexure in four (11.7%). Lymph node positivity in the GEOM region was present in four patients: in the infrapyloric region and pancreatic head, close to the hepatic flexure in three patients; and the midline of GEOM, close to the inferior body of the pancreas in one patient. Perineural invasion (p < .05) and N stage (p < .05) were associated with GEOM region metastasis. Tumor localization and age significantly increased pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In transverse colon and both flexural tumors, we recommend planning the surgery according to the localization of the tumor and including the GEOM, infrapyloric and infrapancreatic areas. It is possible to discuss whether to perform extended excision for all or only selected patients. The best approach seems to be to evaluate the co-factors to manage these patients.

Robotic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer can be performed with a morbidity profile similar to that of conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive surgery, complete mesocolic excision (CME) for transverse colon cancer is challenging; thus, non-CME resections are commonly preferred when laparoscopy is used. Robotic technology has been developed to reduce the limitations of laparoscopy. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether robotic CME for transverse colon cancer can be performed with short-term outcomes similar to those of laparoscopic conventional colectomy (CC). METHODS: A retrospective review of 118 consecutive patients having robotic CME or laparoscopic CC for transverse colon cancer in two specialized centers between May 2011 and September 2018 was performed. Perioperative 30-day outcomes of the two procedures were compared. RESULTS: There were 38 and 80 patients in the robotic CME group and laparoscopic CC group, respectively. The groups were comparable regarding preoperative characteristics. Intraoperative results were similar, including blood loss (median 50 vs 25 ml), complications (5.3% vs 3.8%), and conversions (none vs 7.5%). The rate of intracorporeal anastomosis was significantly higher (86.8% vs 20.0%), mean operative time was longer (325.0 ± 123.2 vs 159.3 ± 56.1 min (p < 0.001), and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the robotic CME group (46.1 ± 22.2 vs 39.1 ± 17.8, p = 0.047). There were only minor differences in length of hospital stay (7.2 ± 3.1 vs 7.9 ± 4.0 days), anastomotic leak (none vs 2.6%), bleeding (none vs 1.3%), surgical site infections (10.5% vs 12.5%), and reoperations (2.6% vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic CME can be performed with a similar morbidity profile as laparoscopic CC for transverse colon cancer along with a higher rate of intracorporeal anastomosis, and higher number of lymph nodes retrieved, but longer operative times.

Which is more important in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer: strict central lymph node dissection or adequate bowel resection margin?

BACKGROUND: What qualifies as optimal lymph node (LN) dissection in the surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC) still remains controversial because few studies have evaluated the distribution of LN metastasis of SFCC. The aim of this study was to clarify detailed distribution of LN metastasis and long-term outcomes of SFCC. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients who had curative colectomy for primary transverse or descending colon cancer of pathological stage I, II, or III at a single high-volume cancer center between April 2002 and December 2018. The 538 eligible patients were divided into three groups: patients with SFCC (SFCC group, n = 168), patients with proximal transverse colon cancer (PTCC group, n = 290), and patients with distal descending colon cancer (DDCC group, n = 80). LNs were classified into horizontal (pericolic) and vertical (intermediate and main) nodes. Intermediate and main LN station numbers were defined according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum classification. Distributions of LN metastasis and long-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In the SFCC group, the mean age was 67.3 ± 10.5 years and 110 patients (65.5%) were male. The proportion of patients with LN metastasis in the intermediate or main region was significantly lower in the SFCC group (8%) than in the PTCC (37%) (p < 0.01) or DDCC group (29%) (p < 0.01) in pathological stage III patients. In the SFCC group, the incidence of pericolic LN metastasis on the oral side of tumor (43%) was significantly higher than in the PTCC group (21%) (p < 0.01) and was similar to that in the DDCC group (42%) (p = 0.51), while in the SFCC group, the incidence of pericolic LN metastasis on the anal side of tumor (17%) was lower than in the PTCC group (31%) and was also similar to that in the DDCC group (21%). There were no significant differences in disease-specific survival rates among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: LN metastasis occurred mainly in the pericolic region, especially on the oral side of the tumor in SFCC. It may, therefore, be important to have an adequate bowel resection margin, especially on the oral side, for SFCC.

Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Provide the surgeon with a tool to decide the best surgical approach to transverse colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy for patients with tumours of the transverse colon. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed in the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE), using the following search terms and/or MeSH terms in all possible combinations: transverse, transversus, colectomy, hemicolectomy, segmental resection, transverse colon cancer. The last search was performed on 10 May 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent authors (Mi.M. and N.V.) analysed each article and performed the data extraction independently. In case of disagreement, a third investigator was consulted (Ma.M.). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data regarding sample size, major clinical and demographic variables, oncologic outcomes and postoperative recovery and complications were extracted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes analysed were anastomotic leakage, early mortality, hospital stay, operative time, overall complications rate, wound infection, harvested nodes and disease-free survival. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy in short- and long-term outcomes; our results revealed no differences in disease-free survival between the two surgical approaches. As expected, a statistically significant difference was found in favour of extended hemicolectomy in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review with meta-analysis focus on the two major approaches to transverse colon cancer. The reviewed evidence suggests that a conservative approach to transverse colon cancer is feasible and safe and oncological outcomes are comparable between a conservative and an extended surgical procedure.

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery in transverse and descending colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single-institutional randomized controlled trial. Patients with transverse or descending colon cancer were randomly allocated to receive laparoscopic surgery (LAC) or conventional open surgery (OC). The primary endpoint was the overall complication rate between the two groups. The secondary endpoints were the length of the postoperative hospital stay, the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) score (at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery), the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS), and the 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between August 2008 and October 2012, a total of 66 patients were enrolled (33 in the LAC group and 33 in the OC group). The patient characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups. The complication rates (≥ grade 3) were 6.1% in the LAC group and 12.1% in the OC group (p = 0.392). The length of postoperative stay was not significantly different between the two groups. Regarding the HRQOL, the physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, and role component summary at 1 month after surgery and the social functioning and mental health at 6 months after surgery were better in the LAC group than in the OC group. The 5-year RFS and OS rates were similar between the LAC and OC groups (RFS 90.5% and 87.3%, respectively, p = 0.752; OS 93.3% and 100.0%, respectively, p = 0.543). CONCLUSIONS: The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer are almost equal to those of open surgery. Laparoscopic resection is a better choice than open surgery for managing this cancer with regard to the short- and mid-term QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01861691 .

Surgical techniques for advanced transverse colon cancer using the pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, not only early cancer but also advanced cancer, has become standardized by some randomized controlled studies. However, cases involving advanced transverse colon cancer were excluded from these studies due to the technical difficulty of the surgery. Hence, laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer is still a theme that we need to overcome. To solve these issues, it is necessary to establish a standardized approach and surgical technique. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES: The advantage of our method, which approaches from both sides of the transverse mesocolon, is that it is easier to achieve hemostasis when active bleeding occurs because this approach provides space for ligating and sealing. This allows the surgeon to perform lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery and vein. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced the usefulness of the "Pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon" to standardize laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer.

Vascular anatomy of the transverse mesocolon and bidirectional laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for patients with advanced transverse colon cancer.

Laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for transverse colon cancer is technically demanding because of complicated anatomy. Here, we reviewed the vascular structure of the transverse mesocolon, explored the extent of the base of the transverse mesocolon, and evaluated the feasibility and oncological safety of D3 lymph node dissection. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 42 patients with advanced transverse colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and D3 dissection at Kyushu University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2015. We examined the venous and arterial anatomy of the transverse mesocolon of each resection and compared surgical outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic D3 (Lap D3) and open D3 (Open D3) dissection. Patients included two with Stage I, 18 with Stage II, 20 with Stage III, and two with Stage IVA. Thirty-six (85.7%) and six (14.3%) patients underwent Lap D3 or Open D3, respectively. The tumor sizes of the Open D3 and Lap D3 groups were 7.8 and 3.7 cm, respectively (P < 0.001). The Lap D3 group had significantly less blood loss (26 mL vs 272 mL, P = 0.002). The other outcomes of the two groups were not significantly different, including 3-year overall survival (87.7% vs 83.3%, P = 0.385). We observed four patterns of the middle colic artery (MCA) arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and the frequency of occurrence of a single MCA was 64.3%. The right-middle colic vein (MCV) was present in 92.9% of resections and served as a tributary of the gastrocolic trunk, and 90.5% of the left MCVs drained into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). The root of the transverse mesocolon was broadly attached to the head of the pancreas and to the surfaces of the SMV and SMA. Laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection may be tolerated by patients with advanced transverse colon cancer.