Comparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher in patients who experienced thromboembolic events. Thus, several guidelines recommend using prophylactic anticoagulants in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients. However, there is uncertainty about the appropriate dosing regimen and safety of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard versus escalated dose pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A two-center retrospective cohort study including critically ill patients aged ≥ 18-years with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March 1st, 2020, until January 31st, 2021. Patients who received either Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or Unfractionated heparin 5000 Units three times daily were grouped under the "standard dose VTE prophylaxis and patients who received higher than the standard dose but not as treatment dose were grouped under "escalated VTE prophylaxis dose". The primary outcome was the occurance of thrombotic events, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, mortality, and other ICU-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients were screened; 565 patients were included in the study. We matched 352 patients using propensity score matching (1:1). In patients who received escalated dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, any case of thrombosis and VTE were similar between the two groups (OR 1.22;95 %CI 0.52-2.86; P = 0.64 and OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.16-3.38; P = 0.70 respectively). However, the odds of minor bleeding was higher in patients who received escalated VTE prophylaxis dose (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.08-10.61; P = 0.04). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality nor in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HR 1.17;95 %CI0.79-1.73; P = 0.43 and HR 1.08;95 %CI 0.76-1.53; P = 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION: Escalated-dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with thrombosis, or mortality benefits but led to an increased risk of minor bleeding. This study supports previous evidence regarding the optimal dosing VTE pharmacological prophylaxis regimen for critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and potential risk of thromboembolic events: Analysis of the WHO global database of individual case safety reports.

Introduction: Thromboembolic events with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer have been reported in few studies. However, the detailed profile of these cases remains mostly uncertain. Method: A descriptive analysis of Thromboembolic events associated with ICIs retrieved from the VigiBase, between 1967 to November 2020. We extracted the data using the terms of 'pulmonary embolism' OR 'deep vein thrombosis' OR 'acute coronary syndrome' OR 'myocardial infarction' OR 'ischemic stroke' (preferred term (PT) (MedDRA). Results: We included 161 cases from 26 countries in our descriptive analysis. Patients' ages were reported in 141 (87.6%) cases, with a median of 68 years (interquartile range 61-74), and 63.4% of the patients were male. Indications for ICIs were reported in 151 (93.8%) cases, as follows: lung cancer (n = 85, 52.8%), renal cell carcinoma (n = 24, 14.9%), melanoma (n = 20, 12.4%), urethral carcinoma (n = 12, 7.45%), breast cancer (n = 4, 2.48%), adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (n = 3, 1.9%), gastric cancer (n = 2, 1.24%), and skin cancer (n = 1, 0.62%). Nivolumab was reported as a suspected drug in 76 cases (47%), pembrolizumab in 46 cases (28.5%), atezolizumab in 21 cases (13%), durvalumab in 14 cases (8.6%), and avelumab in four cases (2.4%).The time to onset of thromboembolic events was reported in 127 (78.8%) cases. Most of these patients (n = 109, 85.8%) reported thromboembolic events within the first six months. The causality assessment of included cases showed that 50.3% of reported thromboembolic events were possibly related to the suspected reported medication, 13.7% were probably related, 13% were unlikely to be related, and 23% were not assessable due to insufficient information. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a possible association between the use of ICIs and thromboembolic events. Further epidemiological studies are needed to assess this association and to elucidate the underlying mechanism.

Symptomatic uterine leiomyomatosis with intracaval and intracardiac invasion: Video case report.

Background: Fibroid is the most prevalent benign tumor of the female genital tract. Intravenous and intracardiac leiomyomatosis (IVL and ICLM, respectively) are rare complications that present with symptoms of pulmonary thromboembolism and heart failure and whose etiology, despite controversial, is a direct vascular invasion by a primary uterine leiomyoma. Case presentation: We present the case of a 31-year-old female patient with a previous history of pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, whose ultrasound showed an enlarged and heterogeneous uterus. Complete hysterectomy was performed, and the anatomopathological examination showed leiomyomas without evidence of malignancy. One month later, the patient manifested dyspnea and chest pain. A neoplastic thrombus was identified, extending from the inferior vena cava to the right atrium, for which we proceeded with cavo-atrial thrombectomy under Normothermic Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) with Warm Blood Cardioplegia (WBC). A metastatic lung injury of non-malignant histology was also detected. Discussion: Uterine leiomyoma is a very common benign tumor of the female genital tract. IVL with ICLM are rare and difficult-to-treat complications, whose etiology is a direct vascular invasion by a primary uterine leiomyoma, although it is still controversial. The incidence of ICLM is 10 to 30% of IVL cases. The main symptoms of ICLM are dyspnea, syncope, edema of the lower extremities and palpitations. Treatment is based on complete surgical removal of the tumor thrombus. Studies demonstrated that the one-stage procedure is safer from the patient's perspective and that CPB with WBC reduced intraoperative blood loss and total operative time, ensuring a less traumatic postoperative. Conclusions: Most patients with uterine leiomyoma are asymptomatic and acute complications are rare. In ICLM clinical manifestations are related to heart failure and flow obstruction. Because of the severity of the condition and the curative potential of treatment, surgery is morbid but highly recommended. The use of CPB with WBC improved the postoperative period and increased the patient's quality of life.

Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes Among Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Infection and Gastrointestinal Symptoms.

Background and Aims: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are present in 20% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection (COVID-19). We studied the association of GI symptoms (in patients with COVID-19) with adverse outcomes and factors associated with poor outcomes in these patients. Methods: The study cohort included 100,902 patients from the Cerner Real-World Data COVID-19 Database of hospital encounters and emergency department visits with COVID-19 infection from December 1, 2019, to November 30, 2020. Multivariate analysis was used to study the effect of GI symptoms on adverse outcomes and the factors associated with mortality, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, and ventilator requirement or oxygen dependence in patients with COVID-19 and GI symptoms. Results: Patients with COVID-19 and GI symptoms were significantly more likely to have ARDS (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 1.29), sepsis (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14, 1.24), acute kidney injury (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.24, 1.36), venous thromboembolism (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22, 1.52), or GI bleed (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47, 1.79) and less likely to experience cardiomyopathy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77, 0.99) or death (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67, 0.75). Among those with GI symptoms, older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, and use of proton pump inhibitors/H2 receptor antagonists were associated with higher mortality, ARDS, sepsis, and ventilator or oxygen requirement. Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 who have GI symptoms have overall worse in-hospital complications but less cardiomyopathy and mortality. Older age, higher comorbidity scores, and the use of proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists are associated with poor outcomes in these patients.

Recurrent upper extremity arterial thrombosis preceding a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Arterial thrombosis occurs when there is endothelial damage in the setting of hypercoagulability and arterial blood stasis. COVID-19 has been theorized to cause both endothelial damage and promote hypercoagulability by causing an imbalance of clotting factors. In many studies, there have been a large proportion of COVID-19 patients that suffered a thromboembolic event, in both the venous and arterial systems. Our patient, who did not have a significant past medical history, presented with a recurrent brachial artery occlusion despite medical and surgical management, and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 late in his admission. In conclusion, there is high suspicion that there is a relationship between COVID-19 infection and recurrent arterial thrombosis.

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Proteasome Inhibitors: Underlying Mechanisms and Management Strategies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.

Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are the backbone of combination treatments for patients with multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis, while also indicated in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and other malignancies. PIs act on proteasome peptidases, causing proteome instability due to accumulating aggregated, unfolded, and/or damaged polypeptides; sustained proteome instability then induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. Carfilzomib, an intravenous irreversible PI, exhibits a more severe cardiovascular toxicity profile as compared with the orally administered ixazomib or intravenous reversible PI such as bortezomib. Cardiovascular toxicity includes heart failure, hypertension, arrhythmias, and acute coronary syndromes. Because PIs are critical components of the treatment of hematological malignancies and amyloidosis, managing their cardiovascular toxicity involves identifying patients at risk, diagnosing toxicity early at the preclinical level, and offering cardioprotection if needed. Future research is required to elucidate underlying mechanisms, improve risk stratification, define the optimal management strategy, and develop new PIs with safe cardiovascular profiles.

Cross-immunity against SARS-COV-2 variants of concern in naturally infected critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 display adaptive immunity, but it is unknown if they develop cross-reactivity to variants of concern (VOCs). We profiled cross-immunity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in naturally infected, non-vaccinated, critically ill COVID-19 patients. Wave-1 patients (wild-type infection) were similar in demographics to Wave-3 patients (wild-type/alpha infection), but Wave-3 patients had higher illness severity. Wave-1 patients developed increasing neutralizing antibodies to all variants, as did patients during Wave-3. Wave-3 patients, when compared to Wave-1, developed more robust antibody responses, particularly for wild-type, alpha, beta and delta variants. Within Wave-3, neutralizing antibodies were significantly less to beta and gamma VOCs, as compared to wild-type, alpha and delta. Patients previously diagnosed with cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had significantly fewer neutralizing antibodies. Naturally infected ICU patients developed adaptive responses to all VOCs, with greater responses in those patients more likely to be infected with the alpha variant, versus wild-type.

Bleeding Complications Associated With Intrauterine Contraception in Women Receiving Anticoagulation Therapy.

Objective: To determine whether anticoagulation therapy is associated with an increased risk of complications after initiation of intrauterine contraception (IUC). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of women receiving anticoagulation therapy at the time of IUC placement from 2000 to 2017 and records of controls (no anticoagulation), matched by race, age, and body mass index. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of bleeding (more than spotting [World Health Organization bleeding grades 2 to 4]), IUC expulsion, and IUC removal. Secondary outcomes included treatment for bleeding and bleeding patterns stratified by medication and IUC type. Outcomes were assessed at 24 hours, 30 days, and 6 months after IUC placement. Results: We matched 208 women taking anticoagulants with 421 controls. The most common anti-coagulant agents were aspirin (60.1%) and warfarin (36.1%). Most women received the levonorgestrel IUC. No complications occurred within 24 hours. Patients receiving anticoagulants had higher rates of the primary composite outcome at 30 days (odds ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.04 to 3.04]; P=.04) and at 6 months (odds ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.29 to 3.26]; P=.002). Primary complications did not differ by IUC type among control patients, but among women receiving anticoagulants, nonhormonal IUC was associated with an increased rate of complications (P=.04). Conclusion: Anticoagulation therapy was associated with higher rates of bleeding at 30 days and 6 months, and nonhormonal IUC plus anticoagulation therapy was associated with higher rates of primary complications. Our findings support current periprocedural anticoagulation guidelines, which state that anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy can be continued at the time of IUC insertion.

Prevalence of bleeding secondary to anticoagulation and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Introduction and purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients admitted with severe COVID-19. However, there is limited data about the management of chronic anticoagulation therapy in these patients. We assessed the anticoagulation and incidence of major cardiovascular events in hospitalized patients with AF and COVID-19. Methods: We retrospectively investigated all consecutive patients with AF admitted with COVID-19 between March and May 2020 in 9 Spanish hospitals. We selected a control group of non-AF patients consecutively admitted with COVID-19. We compared baseline characteristics, incidence of major bleeding, thrombotic events and mortality. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize potential confounding variables, as well as a multivariate analysis to predict major bleeding and death. Results: 305 patients admitted with AF and COVID-19 were included. After PSM, 151 AF patients were matched with 151 control group patients. During admission, low-molecular-weight heparin was the principal anticoagulant and the incidence of major bleeding and mortality were higher in the AF group [16 (10.6%) vs 3 (2%), p = 0.003; 52 (34.4%) vs 35 (23.2%), p = 0.03, respectively]. The multivariate analysis showed the presence of AF as independent predictor of in-hospital major bleeding and mortality in COVID-19 patients. In AF group, a secondary multivariate analysis identified high levels of D-dimer as independent predictor of in-hospital major bleeding. Conclusions: AF patients admitted with COVID-19 represent a population at high risk for bleeding and mortality during admission. It seems advisable to individualize anticoagulation therapy during admission, considering patient specific bleeding and thrombotic risk.

Antecedentes y objetivos: La fibrilación auricular (FA) es frecuente en pacientes ingresados por COVID-19 grave. Sin embargo, los datos sobre el manejo de la anticoagulación crónica en estos pacientes son escasos. Analizamos la anticoagulación y la incidencia de episodios cardiovasculares mayores en pacientes con FA ingresados por la COVID-19. Métodos: Retrospectivamente, se identificaron todos los pacientes con FA ingresados por la COVID-19 entre marzo y mayo de 2020, en 9 hospitales españoles. Se seleccionó un grupo control de pacientes ingresados consecutivamente por la COVID-19 sin FA. Se compararon las características basales, incidencia de hemorragias mayores, episodios trombóticos y mortalidad. Para reducir potenciales factores de confusión se realizó un emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión, así como un análisis multivariante para predecir hemorragia mayor y mortalidad. Resultados: Se incluyeron 305 pacientes con FA ingresados por la COVID-19. Tras el emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión, 151 pacientes con FA fueron emparejados con 151 controles. Durante el ingreso, la heparina de bajo peso molecular fue el principal anticoagulante y la incidencia de hemorragia mayor y mortalidad fue mayor en el grupo de FA (16[10,6%] vs. 3[2%], p = 0,003; 52[34,4%] vs. 35[23,2%], p = 0,03, respectivamente). El análisis multivariante demostró la presencia de FA como predictor independiente de sangrados y mortalidad intrahospitalaria en los pacientes con la COVID-19. En el grupo de FA, un segundo análisis multivariante identificó valores elevados de dímero-D como predictor independiente de hemorragia mayor intrahospitalaria. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con FA ingresados por la COVID-19 representan una población de alto riesgo de sangrado y mortalidad durante el ingreso. Parece recomendable individualizar la anticoagulación durante el ingreso, considerando el riesgo específico de sangrado y trombosis.

Electronic health record risk-stratification tool reduces venous thromboembolism events in surgical patients.

Background: Venous thromboembolism is a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery. To ensure that patients receive appropriate venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis, a nonmandatory risk-stratification tool based on patient clinical condition was implemented through the electronic health record to stratify patient risk and recommend chemoprophylaxis. We hypothesized that implementing this tool would reduce postoperative venous thromboembolism events in general surgery as well as across all surgical services. Methods: All adult patients undergoing inpatient surgical operations (January 2012-December 2019) at a single quaternary care center and Level 1 trauma center were abstracted from institutional electronic health record database and stratified into patients admitted before and after venous thromboembolism risk-stratification tool implementation. Bivariable analyses compared venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis prescription and venous thromboembolism events with implementation and screening among all surgical patients as well as in general surgery patient subset. Results: A total of 64,377 adults underwent operations: 27,819 preimplementation and 36,558 postimplementation. A significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events occurred from pre- to post-tool implementation for all cases (0.77% vs 0.47%, P < .001). General surgery patients (n = 15,723) had a significant increase in chemoprophylaxis prescription (81.9% vs 86.0%, P < .001) and a significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events (1.41% vs 0.59%, P < .001). After tool implementation, use of extended postdischarge chemoprophylaxis was greater among general surgery patient subset than the entire patient cohort (46.7% vs 29.6%, P < .001). Conclusion: The integration of a nonmandatory electronic health record risk-stratification tool was associated with a significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events. Extended chemoprophylaxis was prescribed in nearly half of general surgery patients at very high risk for postdischarge events.

Performance Status and Long-Term Outcomes in Cancer-Associated Pulmonary Embolism: Insights From the Hokusai-VTE Cancer Study.

Background: Performance status (PS) is a reliable prognostic tool for overall survival in patients with cancer-associated pulmonary embolism (PE). However, its association with venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding remains unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether PS at the time of PE diagnosis and its course during follow-up are linked to VTE-related outcomes. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE Cancer study, multivariable survival analysis was used to examine the association of PS with anticoagulation discontinuation and the composite primary outcome of VTE recurrence or major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated PE. PS was assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale at baseline and at predefined study follow-up visits. Results: Overall, 652 patients with cancer-associated PE were included. During 12-month follow-up, PS worsened in 317 of 642 patients (49.4%) with complete ECOG data at the end of follow-up. Those with worse ECOG values over follow-up were more likely to discontinue anticoagulation for any reason apart from death (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.31-1.93). The composite primary outcome occurred in 57 of 500 patients with baseline ECOG status 0 or 1 and in 32 of 152 patients with ECOG status 2 (cumulative incidence at 12 months 10.7% [95% CI: 8.2%-13.9%] vs 14.4% [95% CI: 9.7%-21.3%]). Worse ECOG values during follow-up were associated with greater risk for the composite outcome (adjusted HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.24-3.67). Conclusions: ECOG PS is a valuable indicator for predicting VTE-related outcomes and may inform decision making regarding anticoagulation during follow-up in patients with cancer-associated PE.

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis in a Cyclist With Iliac Vein Compression From Psoas Muscle Hypertrophy.

A 22-year-old avid cyclist presented with 1 month of right lower extremity pain and associated swelling. Subsequent imaging demonstrated an extensive acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the setting of right iliac vein compression from psoas muscle hypertrophy. We present an unusual risk factor for DVT among cyclists. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Real-World Management of Pharmacological Thromboprophylactic Strategies for COVID-19 Patients in Japan: From the CLOT-COVID Study.

Background: Data on prophylactic anticoagulation are important in understanding the current issues, unmet needs, and optimal management of Japanese COVID-19 patients. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the clinical management strategies for prophylactic anticoagulation of COVID-19 patients in Japan. Methods: The CLOT-COVID study was a multicenter observational study that enrolled 2,894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The study population consisted of 2,889 patients (after excluding 5 patients with missing data); it was divided into 2 groups: patients with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (n = 1,240) and those without (n = 1,649). Furthermore, we evaluated the 1,233 patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation-excluding 7 patients who could not be classified based on the intensity of their anticoagulants-who were then divided into 2 groups: patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulant doses (n = 889) and therapeutic anticoagulant doses (n = 344). Results: The most common pharmacological thromboprophylaxis anticoagulant was unfractionated heparin (68.2%). The severity of COVID-19 at admission was a predictor of the implementation of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the multivariable analysis (moderate vs mild: OR: 16.6; 95% CI:13.2-21.0; P < 0.001, severe vs mild: OR: 342.6, 95% CI: 107.7-1090.2; P < 0.001). It was also a predictor of the usage of anticoagulants of therapeutic doses in the multivariable analysis (moderate vs mild: OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.46-3.02; P < 0.001, severe vs mild: OR: 5.96; 95% CI: 3.91-9.09; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the current real-world Japanese registry, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, especially anticoagulants at therapeutic doses, was selectively implemented in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities and severe COVID-19 status at admission.

Early bilateral pulmonary embolism in a polytrauma patient: About a case report.

Introduction: and importance: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in polytrauma patients, associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity. Generally pulmonary embolism (PE) is most common between the fifth and seventh days following a significant trauma, and it is uncommon before the fourth day. Their management remains a challenge to physicians given the nature and risk of blood loss from the accompanying injuries must be considered while using anticoagulant therapy. Case presentation: Here we present a case of acute pulmonary embolism in a previously healthy young woman that developed two days after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and varying degrees of additional blunt thoracic trauma. An angio CT scan was used to make the diagnosis, and the patient was given anticoagulant medication with close monitoring and satisfactory outcomes. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that early after trauma, a considerable number of trauma patients are hypercoagulable. In patients with unexplained dyspnea/hypoxia, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and explore PE early after injury. In the case of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral contusions, intraparenchymal haemorrhages, or subdural/extradural haemorrhages, the existence of post-traumatic PE adds to the problems.

The Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Compared with Critically Ill Influenza and Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review.

The rate of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients has been reported to be 30% (deep vein thrombosis 20% and pulmonary embolism 18%). This has been shown to be higher in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Prophylactic anticoagulation may be sufficient at ward level, but not in intensive care. A retrospective chart review was undertaken in a large university hospital. The review included 276 patients from COVID-19 Wave 1, COVID-19 Wave 2, influenza, and community-acquired pneumonia groups. The timeframe included patients admitted between 23 February 2014 and 12 May 2021. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, blood results, rates of venous thromboembolism, and anticoagulation status were recorded. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 Wave 1, COVID-19 Wave 2, influenza, and community-acquired pneumonia was 10.91%, 13.69%, 13.33%, and 6.81%, respectively (p = 0.481). The incidence of pulmonary embolism was 7.27%, 10.95%, 3.33%, and 5.68%, respectively (p = 0.350). The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 5.45%, 5.48%, 10.00%, and 1.14%, respectively (p = 0.117). Although most patients were prophylactically anticoagulated, venous thromboembolism still occurred. Venous thromboembolism remains an important differential to consider in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The current literature does not advise therapeutic anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.

Outcomes by Class of Anticoagulant Use for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Active Cancer.

Background: The choice of anticoagulant agent for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the setting of active cancer has not been well studied. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the rates of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) compared with warfarin for NVAF in patients with active cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective electronic medical record review of eligible patients treated at a cancer hospital. The outcome events were CVA; GIB; ICH; the composite of GIB, CVA, or ICH; and overall mortality. Propensity score matching (1:1) was conducted to select comparable patients receiving warfarin vs DOACs. Fine-Gray models were fitted for each outcome event. Results: The study cohort included 1,133 patients (mean age 72 ± 8.8 years, 42% women), of whom 74% received DOACs (57% received apixaban). After propensity score matching, 195 patients were included in each anticoagulant agent group. When comparing warfarin with DOACs, there were similar risks for CVA (subdistribution HR: 0.738; 95% CI: 0.334-1.629); ICH (subdistribution HR: 0.295; 95% CI: 0.032-2.709); GIB (subdistribution HR: 1.819; 95% CI: 0.774-4.277); and the composite of GIB, CVA, or ICH (subdistribution HR: 1.151; 95% CI: 0.645-2.054). Conclusions: Patients with active cancer had similar risks for CVA, ICH, and GIB when treated with DOACs compared with warfarin for NVAF.

Prevalence, Treatment, and Prognosis of Tumor Thrombi in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be complicated by a venous tumor thrombus (TT), of which the optimal management is unknown. Objectives: This study sought to assess the prevalence of TT in RCC, its current management, and its association with venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), major bleeding (MB), and mortality. Methods: Patients diagnosed with RCC between 2010 and 2019 in our hospital were included and followed from RCC diagnosis until 2 years after, or until an outcome of interest (VTE, ATE, and MB) or death occurred, depending on the analysis. Cumulative incidences were estimated with death as a competing risk. Cause-specific hazard models were used to identify predictors and the prognostic impact. Results: Of the 647 patients, 86 had a TT (prevalence 13.3%) at RCC diagnosis, of which 34 were limited to the renal vein, 37 were limited to the inferior vena cava below the diaphragm, and 15 extended above the diaphragm; 20 patients started therapeutic anticoagulation and 45 underwent thrombectomy with/without anticoagulation. During follow-up (median 24.0 [IQR: 7.0-24.0] months), 17 TT patients developed a VTE, 0 developed an ATE, and 11 developed MB. TT patients were more often diagnosed with VTE (adjusted HR: 6.61; 95% CI: 3.18-13.73) than non-TT patients, with increasing VTE risks in more proximal TT levels. TT patients receiving anticoagulation still developed VTE (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.13-2.48), at the cost of more MB events (HR: 3.44; 95% CI: 0.95-12.42) compared with those without anticoagulation. Conclusions: Patients with RCC-associated TT were at high risk of developing VTE. Future studies should establish which of these patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy.

Practice towards perioperative care of cesarean delivery in Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Central Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study.

Background: Perioperative obstetric care is vital in clinical practice to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. The standardized practice of perioperative obstetrics care service has a great role in the reduction of both expected and unexpected adverse outcomes. So, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of perioperative obstetric care services based on standards of Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery and the Society of Anesthesiology and Perinatology. Method and materials: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 161 mothers with an elective cesarean delivery from August 10, 2021, to May 15, 2022. The standard of this study was taken from evidence-based practice guidelines of perioperative practice for an elective cesarean delivery. Informed consent was taken from all study participants. The data was collected through direct observation using a standard checklist changed to standardized question forms with two checking components ("Yes", and "No"), and data were entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis and interpretation. Descriptive analysis was done and the results were expressed in numbers and percentages using a table. Results: A total of 161 elective cesarean sections were involved to identify the level of perioperative care. Administration of first-generation antibiotics prophylaxis, aqueous povidone-iodine solution-based skin preparations, and preparation for immediate neonatal resuscitation were fully performed based on the standards. Conclusions: The majority of elective caesarian deliveries were carried out below the recommended level as per the checklists for perioperative practice. So, added interventions are needed to improve perioperative obstetrics care services on those standards which are not totally applied and partially performed.

Cardiovascular complications in the Post-Acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS).

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV 2) or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) initially surfaced in December 2019 from Wuhan, China, sweeping the world with various strains, forcing the WHO to declare a pandemic epidemic in March 2020. Furthermore, COVID-19 manifests with a wide array of presentations from fever and fatigue to severe respiratory and cardiovascular complications. Post-COVID-19 syndrome is poorly understood affecting COVID-19 survivors at all levels of disease severity. The disease is most associated with post-discharge dyspnea and fatigue. However, other persistent symptoms as chest pains, palpitations, smell, and taste dysfunctions. Patients with high concentrations of CRP and creatinine in the acute phase of Covid-19 are more prone to cardiac sequelae. Therefore, high levels of cardiac-sensitive troponin and hypokalaemia can also be used for risk stratification. Furthermore, Cardiac damage can manifest as myocarditis, pericarditis, rhythm abnormalities. The use of different diagnostic modalities like electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)(CMR) to evaluate the myocardial damage were studied. However, Cardiovascular complications are a common manifestation of PASC, classification of severity of cardiac symptoms and the emergence of CMR as a diagnostic tool needs more evidence.

COVID-19 in the perioperative setting: A review of the literature and the clinical landscape.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected societies and healthcare systems around the globe. The perioperative care continuum has also been under significant strain due to the pandemic-tasked with simultaneously addressing surgical strains and backlogs, infection prevention strategies, and emerging data regarding significantly higher perioperative risk for COVID-19 patients and survivors. Many uncertainties persist regarding the perioperative risk, assessment, and management of COVID-19 survivors-and the energy to catch up on surgical backlogs must be tempered with strategies to continue to mitigate COVID-19 related perioperative risk. Here, we review the available data for COVID-19-related perioperative risk, discuss areas of persistent uncertainty, and empower the perioperative teams to pursue evidence-based strategies for high quality, patient-centered, team-based care as we enter the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic.