Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare conventional bipolar electrosurgery with advanced bipolar vessel sealing (ABVS) devices for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library from January 1989 to November 2021. We identified all studies comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery in TLH and reporting at least one of the following outcomes: total blood loss, total operative time, hospital stay, perioperative complications, or costs. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random effect model reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with related 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies encompassing 314 patients were included out of 615 manuscripts. The pooled estimated total blood loss in the ABVS devices group was lower than conventional bipolar electrosurgery of 39 mL (95% CI - 65.8 to - 12.6 mL; p = .004). The use of ABVS devices significantly reduced the total operative time by 8 min (95% CI - 16.7 to - 0.8 min; p = .033). Hospital stay length did not differ between the two groups, and a comparable overall surgical complication rate was observed [OR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.256 - 3.200; p = .878]. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery for TLH is lacking. ABVS devices were associated with reduced total blood loss and operative time; however, observed differences seem clinically irrelevant. Further research is required to clarify the advantages of ABVS devices over conventional bipolar electrosurgery and to identify cases that may benefit more from their use.

Outcomes of conventional and advanced energy devices in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Hemostasis is an important step in all surgical procedures. Mechanical methods of hemostasis have been gradually abandoned in favor of electrosurgery. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrosurgical instruments utilized in minimally invasive gynecological procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review, including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, comparing the outcomes of different energy devices (EDs) used in laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries. We extracted data about blood loss (BL), mean operative time, post-operative pain, hospital stay and complications associated with each electrosurgical device. RESULTS: We included 30 studies reporting comparative outcomes concerning conventional (bipolar and monopolar) and innovative EDs (Harmonic scalpel, LigaSure, Plasma kinetic gyrus, Thunderbeat, EnSeal, Marseal, Caiman and ALAN). New EDs were found to be more efficient in complex surgeries due to less intraoperative BL and shorter operative time. No significant decrease in hospital stay, post-operative pain or complications was found with the use of new energy instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Although new electrosurgical devices seem an appealing and safer option, there is still insufficient evidence for one vessel-sealing technology to be considered superior to another. Therefore, monopolar and conventional bipolar (CB) are still widely used in laparoscopic gynecology.

Effects of GLUBRAN-2 on the Burst Pressure of Jejunal Loops Thermofused With Vessel Sealing Devices.

BACKGROUND: Off-label use of radiofrequency vessel sealing devices for intestinal thermofusion has been reported as an alternate approach for closing the small and large intestines. The study aimed to evaluate if reinforcing the thermofusion line with a modified N-butyl-2-CyanoAcrylate and methacryloxysulpholane produced improved burst pressure values in ex vivo swine jejunal loops. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A suture-less full-thickness jejunal biopsy was performed with different radiofrequency vessel-sealing devices (Ligasure 5 mm: RFVS-1; Atlast 10 mm: RFVS-2; Cayman Maryland: RFVS-3), and reinforcement with modified cyanoacrylate Glubran-2 (G2) at the thermofusion defect was applied. Burst pressure(BP) values were compared with a control group, wherein a cold blade was utilized to obtain the biopsy, followed by the closing of the jejunum with seven Gambee sutures. RESULTS: Seventy (n = 70) jejunal loop samples were distributed into the experimental groups.The RFVS-1 and -2 groups exhibited BP values similar to those of the suture group. The RFVS-3 group showed significantly lower BP values (P < 0.05) than the suture group. Conversely, in the groups wherein G2 was applied, all BP values were comparable to those of the suture group. BP test in the RFVS-3G2 group showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher values in the group using the same instrument without the glue (RFVS-3). CONCLUSIONS: G2 has been shown to improve the BP on the defects created by instruments that are not completely efficient in intestinal thermofusion and sealing. This experimental model showed that the performance of full-thickness biopsies with RFVS devices and reinforcement with G2 provide feasible and promising results.

An advanced bipolar device helps reduce the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advanced bipolar devices (ABD; e.g., LigaSure™) have a lower blade temperature than ultrasonically activated devices (USAD; e.g., Harmonic® and Sonicision™) during activation, potentially enabling accurate lymph node dissection with less risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) due to pancreatic thermal injury in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of ABD and USAD in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) between August 2008 and September 2020. A total of 371 patients were enrolled, and short-term surgical outcomes, including the incidence of ISGPF grades B and C POPF, were compared between ABD and USAD. The risk factors for POPF in LDG were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A propensity score-matching algorithm was used to select 120 patients for each group. The POPF rate was significantly lower (0.8 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), the morbidity rate was lower (13.3 vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), the length of postoperative hospitalization was shorter (14 vs. 19 days, p < 0.001), and the lymph node retrieval rate was higher (34 vs. 26, p < 0.001) with an ABD than with a USAD. There were no mortalities in either group. A multivariate analysis showed that a USAD was the only independent risk factor with a considerably high odds ratio for the occurrence of POPF (USAD/ABD, odds ratio 8.38, p = 0.0466). CONCLUSION: An ABD may improve the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

Novel multifunctional robotically assisted bipolar instrument for simultaneous radiofrequency sealing and transection: preclinical and single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: A novel robotic-assisted bipolar radiofrequency (RF) multifunctional vessel seal-and-transection instrument (SynchroSeal, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) has been developed. The objective of the current paper is to describe the design of SynchroSeal based on bench studies, assess the safety of SynchroSeal in ex vivo and in vivo porcine studies, and provide early clinical context. METHODS: SynchroSeal grasping, energy activation time, and jaw temperature were evaluated with those of the Harmonic Ace+7. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, with Mann-Whitney for comparisons and statistical significance p < 0.05. Ex vivo and in vivo animal safety assessments of tissue after SynchroSeal use were evaluated for burst pressure, thermal spread, and acute sealing. Last, a single-center analysis of the technical metrics of SynchroSeal and Vessel Sealer Extend (robotically assisted seal-and-transection instrument) in bariatric cases is provided. RESULTS: Bench studies of SynchroSeal and Harmonic Ace+7 evidenced SynchroSeal's greater slip resistance force (8.4 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.4 N; p = 0.0002), lower grip pressure (3.0 ± 0.2 vs. 4.2 ± 0.5 kg/cm2; p = 0.0002), faster seal time (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 11.6 ± 2.5 s; p < 0.0001), lower mean jaw temperature (109.7 ± 7.2 vs. 247.4 ± 8.6 °C; p = 0.0051), and faster cooling to 40 °C (53.6 ± 2.1 vs. 68.0 ± 3.5 s; p = 0.0051). SynchroSeal's mean burst pressures after seal-and-transection and seal only modes were, respectively, 1169.1 ± 393.1 mmHg and 1159.2 ± 454.6 mmHg. Mean thermal spreads were, respectively, 1.2 ± 0.6 mm and 1.5 ± 0.55 mm. In the chronic animal study, 102 vessels were sealed; at 3 weeks post-procedure, there was no evidence of leakage or adverse events, such as non-target tissue thermal spread or tissue damage. In bariatrics cases, SynchroSeal was activated more frequently per case; however, its mean activation time was significantly shorter than Vessel Sealer Extend. No adverse events were reported for either device. CONCLUSIONS: SynchroSeal's multifunctional design provides enhanced sealing and transection capabilities with an acceptable safety profile.

Comparison of conventional ligatures and a vessel sealing device for haemostasis during open ovariohysterectomy in rabbits.

AIMS: To compare surgical times and rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications for open ovariohysterectomy (OVH) in female rabbits using conventional ligatures or a vessel sealing device (VSD) for haemostasis. METHODS: Female pet rabbits (n = 23) presented for OVH for either desexing or treatment of reproductive disorders were randomly assigned to a conventional ligatures (CL) group (n = 12) or a LigaSure 5-mm (LS5) group (n = 11). In the CL group, the ovarian pedicles were ligated with a single surgeon's knot. After transection of the ovarian pedicles, the broad ligament was manually broken down along the uterine horns to their respective cervices. In the LS5 group, both ovarian pedicles and the broad ligaments were sealed with a LigaSure Dolphin Tip VSD with 5-mm forceps. All the rabbits were hospitalised for 24 hours after surgery. Two weeks after discharge, a clinical recheck examination was performed. Incision length, overall surgical time (from initial incision to completion of intradermal suturing), OVH time (from identification of the first ovary to transection of the vaginal vault), and intra- and post-operative complications were recorded and compared between groups, using the Student's t-test for normally distributed continuous data, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed continuous data and Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data. RESULTS: The mean overall surgical time was 14.1 (SD 4.4) minutes. The surgery took 15.0 (SD 4.9) minutes in the CL group and 13.1 (SD 3.8) minutes in the LS5 group (p=0.10). The OVH time was shorter in the LS5 group (mean 4.2 (SD 0.9) minutes) than in the CL group (mean 6.3 (SD 1.7) minutes; p = 0.005). No intra-operative complications were encountered in the LS5 group. Haemorrhage occurred in three rabbits in the CL group. One rabbit in the LS5 group developed steatonecrosis post-operatively. There was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of rabbits that experienced intra- and post-operative complications (p = 0.25 and p = 0.94 respectively) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a LigaSure 5-mm VSD and conventional ligatures during open OVH were both associated with similar overall surgical times and complication rates. The OVH times were shorter in the LS5 group compared to the CL group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of the LigaSure 5-mm VSD allows efficient haemostasis while performing open OVH in female pet rabbits.

A new bipolar device for sealing and cutting: ex and in vivo studies for performance evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: A novel multipurpose bipolar radiofrequency instrument, the Erbe Dissector (EDS), which simultaneously seals and cuts tissue, was developed. Ex vivo sealing rate and time, burst pressure, jaw temperature and thermal spread were studied in porcine renal arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In vivo, 13 surgical tasks were performed in two pigs: beside sealing rate and time, overall performance in sharp and blunt dissection, tissue sticking, hemostasis, precision, etc., were evaluated by four surgeons compared with ENSEAL G2 (EG2) using surveys on a Likert scale (1 = very poor; 5 = very good). RESULTS: Ex vivo, the EDS sealing rate was 91.7% (33/36 arteries) at an average sealing time of 2.1 s (range 1.7-2.8) and a burst pressure of 1040 ± 350 mmHg. The maximum jaw temperature was 87 ± 4 °C and the mean lateral thermal spread was 0.8 ± 0.2 mm. In vivo, the sealing rate for arteries and veins was 92.6% (50/54) and the median seal and cut time was 1.6 s (range: 1.3-2.9). The average EDS performance score across all tasks was 4.4 ± 0.6 Likert points. For five shared tasks, EDS was better than EG2 (4.4 ± 0.5 versus 3.4 ± 0.6 Likert points; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: EDS seals and cuts arteries and veins rapidly with good safety and user-friendliness.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing LigaSure™ small jaw instrument (LSJI) with conventional suture ligation in total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). METHODS: In this retrospective study 80 patients who underwent hysterectomy in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Gulhane Education and Research Hospital between April 2017 and August 2018 were included. Two different groups that underwent Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing LigaSure™ small jaw instrument (LSJI) and conventional suture ligation in hysterectomy operation were analyzed retrospectively. The parameters evaluated and compared between the two groups include operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospitalization and incision length. RESULTS: Among the parameters we compared between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the amount of intraoperative blood loss (p:0.68) and the incision length (p:0.65). Among the parameters we compared between the two groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the operation time (p:0.016) and the duration of hospitalization (p:0.01). CONCLUSION: Our comparison of LSJI vs. conventional ligation in hysterectomy revealed a significant difference only in operative time, where surgeries involving conventional ligation were shorter. On the other hand, incision length was evaluated in our study which has not been addressed in previous studies. There is also a need for multi-center studies that include more patients and evaluate cost-effectiveness.

Computational Simulations for Infrared Laser Sealing and Cutting of Blood Vessels.

Blood vessel burst pressures were simulated and predicted for sealing and cutting of vessels in a two-step process, using low (<25 W), medium (~100 W), and high (200 W) power lasers at a wavelength of 1470 nm. Monte Carlo optical transport, heat transfer, Arrhenius integral tissue damage simulations, and vessel pressure equations were utilized. The purpose of these studies was to first validate the numerical model by comparison with experimental results (for low and medium power) and then to use the model to simulate parameters that could not be experimentally tested (for high power). The goal was to reduce the large range of parameters (power, irradiation time, and linear beam dimensions) to be tested in future experiments, for achieving short vessel sealing/cutting times, minimal bifurcated seal zones (BSZ), and high vessel burst pressures. Blood vessels were compressed to 400 µm thickness. A wide range of linear beam profiles (1-5 mm widths and 8-9.5 mm lengths), incident powers (20-200 W) and clinically relevant irradiation times (0.5-5.0 s) were simulated and peak seal and cut temperatures as well as thermal seal zones, ablation zones, and BSZ computed. A simplistic mathematical expression was used to estimate vessel burst pressures based on seal width. Optimal low-power parameters were: 24W/5s/8×2mm (sealing) and 24W/5s/8×1mm (cutting), yielding a BSZ of 0.4 mm, corresponding to experimental burst pressures of ~450 mmHg. Optimal medium-power parameters were: 90W/1s/9.5×3mm (sealing) and 90W/1s/9.5×1mm (cutting), yielding a BSZ of 0.9 mm for burst pressures of ~1300 mmHg. Simulated only optimal high-power parameters were: 200W/0.5s/9×3 mm (sealing) and 200W/0.5s/9×1mm (cutting), yielding a BSZ of 0.9 mm and extrapolated to predict a seal strength of ~1300 mmHg. All lasers produced seal zones between 0.4-1.5 mm, corresponding to high vessel burst pressures of 300-1300 mmHg (well above normal systolic blood pressure of 120 mmHg). Higher laser powers enable shorter sealing/cutting times and higher vessel strengths.

Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy: a comparative study of different techniques for vessel sealing.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the standard surgical approach to adrenal lesions. Adrenal vessel sealing is the critical surgical phase of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This study aimed at comparing perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy by means of radiofrequency energy-based device (LARFD) to those performed with traditional clipping device (LACD), while focusing on the different adrenal vessel control techniques. METHODS: Patients who underwent adrenalectomy for adrenal disease between January 1994 and April 2019 at the Surgical Clinic, Polytechnic University of Marche were included in the study. Overall, 414 patients met inclusion criteria for study eligibility: 211 and 203 patients underwent LARFD and LACD, respectively. Multiple models of quantile regression, logistic regression and Poisson finite mixture regression were used to assess the relationship between operative time, conversion to open procedure, length of stay (LoS), surgical procedure and patient characteristics, respectively. RESULTS: LARFD reduced operative time of about 12 min compared to LACD. Additional operative time-related factors were surgery side, surgery approach, conversion to open procedure and trocar number. The probability of conversion to open procedure decreased by about 76% for each added trocar, whereas it increased by about 49% for each added centimeter of adrenal lesion and by about 25% for each added year of surgery. Two patient clusters were identified based on the LoS: long-stay and short-stay. In the long-stay cluster, LoS decreased of about 30% in LARFD group and it was significantly associated with conversion to open procedure and postoperative complications, whereas in short-stay cluster only postoperative complications had a significant effect on LoS. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy performed by means of radiofrequency energy-based device for the sealing of adrenal vessels is an effective procedure reducing operative time with potentially improved postoperative outcomes.

A new method using a vessel-sealing system provides coagulation effects to various types of bleeding with less thermal damage.

BACKGROUND: Hemostasis is very important for a safe surgery, particularly in endoscopic surgery. Accordingly, in the last decade, vessel-sealing systems became popular as hemostatic devices. However, their use is limited due to thermal damage to organs, such as intestines and nerves. We developed a new method for safe coagulation using a vessel-sealing system, termed flat coagulation (FC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this new FC method compared to conventional coagulation methods. METHODS: We evaluated the thermal damage caused by various energy devices, such as the vessel-sealing system (FC method using LigaSure™), ultrasonic scissors (Sonicision™), and monopolar electrosurgery (cut/coagulation/spray/soft coagulation (SC) mode), on porcine organs, including the small intestine and liver. Furthermore, we compared the hemostasis time between the FC method and conventional methods in the superficial bleeding model using porcine mesentery. RESULTS: FC caused less thermal damage than monopolar electrosurgery's SC mode in the porcine liver and small intestine (liver: mean depth of thermal damage, 1.91 ± 0.35 vs 3.37 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.0015). In the superficial bleeding model, the hemostasis time of FC was significantly shorter than that of electrosurgery's SC mode (mean, 19.54 ± 22.51 s vs 44.99 ± 21.18 s; p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the FC method caused less thermal damage to porcine small intestine and liver than conventional methods. This FC method could provide easier and faster coagulation of superficial bleeds compared to that achieved by electrosurgery's SC mode. Therefore, this study motivates for the use of this new method to achieve hemostasis with various types of bleeds involving internal organs during endoscopic surgeries.

Repeated partial tissue bite with inadequate cooling time for an energy device may cause thermal injury.

BACKGROUND: Over the past three decades, the use of ultrasonically activated device (USAD) and advanced bipolar device (ABD) has grown in minimally invasive surgeries. However, the thermal profile differences during repeated dissection with different grasping ranges of energy devices, which provide valuable information for preventing thermal injury by energy devices, remain unclear. METHODS: We developed an ex vivo benchtop model to examine the temperature profile of the blade and jaws of two USADs (HARMONIC® ACE + and Sonicision™) and a ABD (Ligasure™ Maryland) with different grasping ranges (partial tissue and full tissue bite) in repeated dissection with minimum cooling time. The maximum temperature, time required for completion to dissection of 10 cm of porcine muscle, thermal spread, and cooling time to reach 60 °C were continuously measured using video thermography. In addition, to evaluate one more grasping range "no tissue", we performed a stress test that activated the USAD without tissue intervention to assess the effects of excessive load on the blade and jaw. RESULTS: Repeated dissection of energy devices with minimal cooling time results in high blade and jaw temperatures proportional to the incision distance. In particular, the USADs with partial tissue bite showed a significantly higher temperatures at the blade and jaw, longer cooling times, and higher lateral thermal spread than those with a full tissue bite and the ABD. The stress test with a USAD showed an extremely high blade temperature exceeding 400 °C, with the tissue pad melting only 13.2 s after activation. CONCLUSION: Although USAD with partial tissue bite help ensure precise dissection, repeated long activation with inadequate cooling time may increase the risk of thermal injury during surgery. These results suggest that surgeons should use energy devices properly while understanding the risks of adjacent organ damage that could result from abuse of the device.

Safety and Efficacy of Using Staplers and Vessel Sealing Devices for Laparoscopic Splenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background. Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is considered the operation of choice on elective basis for managing patients with certain hematological disorders. Hemostatic control of the splenic pedicle is one of the crucial steps in LS. This study compares the safety and efficacy of using endoscopic staplers and vessel sealing devices to control the splenic pedicle in patients with nonsevere splenomegaly. Methods. Fifty-one consecutive patients with different blood disorders including idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), hypersplenism, and lymphoma were randomized for elective LS. Traditional steps of LS, via lateral approach, were followed, and pedicle control was done with either endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler (n = 26) or vessel sealing device (Ligasure) (n = 25). Results. No difference was noted with different splenic spans when using either methods of pedicle control (P = .145). The volume of blood loss was higher in the Ligasure group compared to the staplers group (182 mL vs 131 mL, respectively), but was not statistically significant (P = .249). Conversion to open was notably higher in the Ligasure group (P = .034), but the intraoperative complications were comparable in both groups (P = .357). Conclusion. The use of vessel sealing devices for splenic pedicle control has comparable surgical outcomes compared with the use of endoscopic staplers for LS, but with higher rate of conversion to open surgery.

Energy Based Vessel Sealing Devices in Thyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review to Clarify the Relationship with Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries.

Background and objectives: The principal complications associated with thyroid surgery consist in postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, hypoparathyroidism, intra-operative and post-operative hemorrhage. In this paper, structured as a literature review, we describe the current knowledge and the technical improvements currently employed in the field of thyroid surgery, focusing on the contribution of energy based devices in relation with the reduction of the operating time and the odds of possible complication. Materials and methods: a relevant systematic literature search on Pubmed was carried out including works from 2004 through 2019, selecting studies providing information on the energy based devices employed in surgeries and statistic data concerning RNL (transient and permanent) injury and operative time. Results: Nineteen studies were reviewed, dealing with 4468 patients in total. The operative variables considered in this study are: employed device, number of patients, pathological conditions affecting the patients, surgical treatment, RNL injury percentage and the operating time, offering an insight on different patient conditions and their relative operative outcomes. A total of 1843 patients, accounting to the 41.2% of the total pool, underwent the traditional technique operation, while 2605 patients (58.3%) were treated employing the energy based devices techniques. Thyroidectomy performed by approaches different from traditional (for example robotic, MIVAT (Mini Invasive Video Assisted thyroidectomy)) were excluded from this study. Conclusions: The energy-based vessel sealing devices in study, represent a safe and efficient alternative to the traditional clamp-and-tie hand technique in the thyroidal surgery scenario, granting a reduction in operating time while not increasing RNL injury rates. According to this information, a preference for energy based devices techniques might be expressed, furthermore, a progressively higher usage rate for these devices is expected in the near future.

Prevention of lymphorrhea in aortic lymphadenectomy.

The objective of this video 1 is to describe the technique to avoid postoperative lymphorrhea after a lumboaortic lymphadenectomy. All procedures were performed at Donostia University Hospital, a tertiary referral and educational center in San Sebastián, Spain. Lumboaortic extra-peritoneal lymphadenectomy was performed for several gynecological malignancies (endometrial and cervical cancer). During the procedure, afferent lymphatic capillaries were identified at the infra-renal aortic level and clipped to avoid retrograde lymphorrhea at this level. Numerous strategies have been described to reduce the likelihood of lymphorea and lymphocele formation.1 Harmonic scalpel and other sealing advanced devices are not useful to secure lymphatic leakage at this level, although some authors have published a clinical benefit in their use,2 while clips have been found useful to prevent leakage in other lymphatic locations.3 The use of harmonic scalpel, biological agents or surgical patch has been ineffective in our experience, but sealing clips and peritonization (marsupialization),4 once the procedure is concluded, could be an effective approach. Performing simple gestures during lumboaortic lymphadenectomy can help to reduce the appearance of posterior lymphorrhea.

Evaluation of a novel electrosurgical sealing mode in an ex vivo and in vivo porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar vessel sealing has been successfully introduced in a variety of procedures like prostatectomy, hysterectomy, and nephrectomy. In this study, we evaluated a new sealing mode-the thermoSEAL® mode (TSM)-operated with the VIO3 generator in an ex vivo and in vivo animal study and compared the results with the commercially available BiClamp mode (BCM), operated with the VIO300D generator. Two different instruments were used in combination with both modes, BiCision® and BiClamp® 201T (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH). METHODS: In the ex vivo experiment, the sealing of renal arteries was evaluated using both instruments and modes. For the in vivo study, different types of arteries and veins were sealed using both modes and instruments in a side-by-side comparison for acute complications in a total of four animals. RESULTS: Mean burst pressure was in all cases significantly above 360 mmHg (p < 0.001). Sealing time during the ex vivo setting was significantly shorter for TSM compared to BCM: BiCision® (3.7 ± 0.4 vs. 7.1 ± 0.3 s; p < 0.0001); BiClamp® 201T (3.9 ± 0.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.1 s; p < 0.0015). Lateral thermal damage was more pronounced for BCM: BiCision® (TSM 1.4 ± 0.3 mm vs. BCM 1.9 ± 0.2 mm; p < 0.0001); BiClamp® 201T (TSM 1.9 ± 0.6 mm vs. BCM 3.1 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.0001). The sealing time during the in vivo study was significantly shorter for TSM in combination with BiCision® for arteries [TSM 3.0 ± 0.7 s vs. BCM 6.5 ± 1.3 s, (p < 0.0001) and veins 3.2 ± 1.1 vs. 5.8 ± 1.8 s, (p < 0.0001)]. No significant differences were seen for the two modes used with BiClamp® 201T [artery: TSM 3.3 ± 0.7 s vs. BCM 3.4 ± 0.9 s, (p = 0.891)]. High sealing rates for arteries (100%) and veins (>90%) were noted for both instruments and modes. CONCLUSIONS: While both modes used with two different instruments reveal high safety characterized by a high burst pressure, low thermal damage (ex vivo) zones, and high sealing rates (in vivo), the thermoSEAL® mode convinces by its fast sealing speed probably helping to reduce operation time.

Retroperitoneal Lumboaortic Lymphadenectomy Using a Vessel-Sealing Device in 10 Steps.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Lumboaortic lymphadenectomy is frequently performed in the surgical management of different gynecologic pelvic malignancies: cervical endometrial and ovarian cancer. The retroperitoneal access presents a real advantage, allowing direct access to vascular axes, thus avoiding bowel segments. The use of a vessel-sealing device could facilitate the technique by providing an ergonomic alternative to conventional tools such as a bipolar grasper and scissors. Here the surgical technique of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device in 10 steps is described. DESIGN: Educative video (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Tertiary referral center in Strasbourg, France. PATIENTS: Women undergoing lumboaortic lymphadenectomy. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device. The local institutional review board approved the video. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The surgeon and assistant are positioned on the left of the patient and the column is placed in front. After peritoneal exploration 3 trocars are introduced in the left flank according to a very precise arrangement. We use a camera scope with a zero-degree view angle. After development of the extraperitoneal space and identification of the vascular landmarks, lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device involves several steps in an anticlockwise direction starting from the left common iliac group. We first start with the lateroaortic group of lymph nodes. We then continue with the preaortic, interaorticocaval, and precaval supramesenteric group. After that, we perform the inframesenteric dissection of lymph nodes, the bifurcation of the aorta, and finally the right common iliac group. At the end of the procedure, in the absence of signs of metastatic lymph nodes, we open the peritoneum. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device is useful because of better ergonomics of the multitasking instrument, avoiding alternating between scissors and bipolar forceps. The surgeon will be able to use both hands for exposure and for surgery. The presence of a metastatic ganglion is an important and decisive factor in the choice of adjuvant or neoadjuvant management of cancers, especially for cervical cancer.

Comparison of Industry-Leading Energy Devices for Use in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure Energy Devices.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 laparoscopic bipolar electrosurgical devices used in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). An articulating advanced bipolar device (ENSEAL G2; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) and an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed for differences in surgeon perception of ease of instrument use and workload using the NASA Raw Task Load Index (RTLX) scale. A second objective was to examine differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and perioperative complication rates between the 2 devices. DESIGN: Single-institution, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Eligibility required planned TLH, over age 18 years, and able to give informed consent; exclusions were stage III or IV endometriosis, known gynecologic malignancy, and early decision for conversion to laparotomy. One hundred seventy-eight patients screened, 142 enrolled, 2 withdrew, and 140 completed the study. Patients were followed 1 month postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative randomization to articulating advanced bipolar device or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer to be used during TLH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the end of each hysterectomy the primary surgeon completed an ergonomic assessment tool, the RTLX. Results were analyzed to detect differences in workload between the 2 devices. For each case the time to ligation of the bilateral uterine arteries, EBL, and complications (including device failure, blood transfusion, or other injury) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for normally distributed data, χ2 test for categorical data, and Mann-Whitney U-test for nonparametric data. There were no differences in age, body mass index, parity, prior surgery, uterine weight, race, indication, pathology, and comorbidities between the 2 groups. A statistically significant increase in RTLX scores (p < .0001), device failures (p = .0031), and time to ligation of bilateral uterine arteries (p = .0281) was noted in the articulating device group. No significant differences in EBL or complication rates were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The articulating advanced bipolar device was shown to have a statistically significant increase in surgeon-perceived workload and rate of device failure when used in TLH; however, clinical and surgical outcomes were equivalent.

Major vessel sealing in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience with 759 patients.

BACKGROUND: Efficient hemostatic techniques are essential in laparoscopic surgery for ideal intraoperative and postoperative results. A variety of advanced devices are available for the sealing of major vascular structures. The aim of this study is to assess effectiveness and safety of major vessel sealing with a radiofrequency device during laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer based on the experience of a single hospital. METHODS: Early outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who received elective laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer over a 10-year period (January 2008-September 2017) are analyzed. In all procedures, the Ligasure® electrothermal bipolar device was used for the closure of the major colonic vessels and the dissection of all the structures. No other products such clips, staplers, hemostatic products, or other devices were used. RESULTS: Seven-hundred fifty-nine procedures were performed in laparoscopy: 179 rectal resections, 247 sigmoidectomies and left hemicolectomies, 240 right hemicolectomies, 33 resections of the splenic flexure, 35 transverse colonic resections, and 25 other procedures. In 39 cases, the laparoscopic procedure was converted to open surgery, and in these cases, vessel sealing was also achieved with the radiofrequency device alone. Vessel dissection and sealing was realized in all cases without any intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. No reoperations for bleeding from major vessels were performed in any patients. One case of reoperation was recorded postoperatively, at 3 h after right hemicolectomy, due to a small bleeding from the fat of the transverse colon stump. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ligasure® radiofrequency device for sealing and dividing the major colonic vessels is safe, fast, and effective during laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Bipolar vessel-sealing devices in laparoscopic hysterectomies: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare operating time and blood loss in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomies (TLH) for benign conditions with either the Marseal™ IQ 5 mm (MS) or the Ligasure™ 5 mm (LS) vessel-sealing device. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) in two German gynecology departments. PATIENTS: 74 patients scheduled to undergo TLH for a symptomatic fibroid uterus, adenomyosis or severe meno-metrorrhagia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a TLH with either the MS or the LS device. 27 variables were prospectively collected to address potential confounding issues. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Operating time, defined as the time period between the first (round ligament dissection) and the last (uterine vessels sealing) use of the device, estimated and calculated intraoperative blood loss. The mean operating time (95% confidence interval, CI) was 22.7 min (95% CI 17.6-27.7) for LS and 26.4 min (95% CI 20-32.8) for the MS device (p = .89). The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 164 ml (95% CI 110-217) for LS and 160 ml (95% CI 116-203) for the MS device (p = .36). The multivariate analyses accounting for BMI, endometriosis, uterine weight and appearance of fibroids did not reveal any significant effect of the type of device used on operating time and estimated blood loss. CONCLUSION: In this RCT, both devices provided reliable and effective sealing and dissection. The reusable MS showed non-inferiority against the disposable LS device with regard to operating time and estimated intraoperative blood loss.