Tadalafil use is associated with a lower incidence of Type 2 diabetes in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil, commonly prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), may benefit patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for glycemic markers and complications. However, the association between the long-term use of tadalafil and the incidence of T2DM has not been investigated. METHODS: We emulated a target trial of tadalafil use (5 mg/day) and the risk of T2DM using a population-based claims database in Japan. Patients who initiated tadalafil or alpha-blockers for BPH and had no history of diabetes diagnosis, no dispensing of glucose-lowering drugs, and no history of hemoglobin A1c levels of ≥6.5% (47-48 mmol/mol) were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of T2DM. Pooled logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 5-year cumulative incidence differences (CIDs). RESULTS: A total of 5180 participants initiated tadalafil treatment and were compared with 20,049 patients who initiated alpha-blockers. The median follow-up time for each arm was 27.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12.0-47.9) in tadalafil users and 31.3 months (IQR, 13.7-57.2) in alpha-blocker users. The incidence rates of T2DM in tadalafil and alpha-blocker users were 5.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-7.2) and 8.8 (95% CI, 7.8-9.8) per 1000-person years, respectively. Initiation of tadalafil was associated with a reduced risk of T2DM (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62; 5-year CID, -0.031; 95% CI, -0.040 to -0.019). CONCLUSION: The incidence of T2DM was lower in men with BPH treated with tadalafil than in those treated with alpha-blockers. Thus, tadalafil may be more beneficial than alpha-blockers in preventing T2DM.

Reversal of Pharmacologically Induced Mydriasis with Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution.

PURPOSE: Evaluate safety and efficacy of 0.75% phentolamine ophthalmic solution (POS), an alpha-1 antagonist, in reversal of pharmacologically induced mydriasis. DESIGN: Two Phase 3, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-masked clinical trials in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS: 553 healthy 12 to 80 year old subjects were randomized 1:1 (MIRA-2) and 2:1 (MIRA-3) to receive either POS or placebo eye drops OU. METHODS: Subjects received POS or placebo administered 1 hour after mydriasis, induced by instillation of either 2.5% phenylephrine, 1% tropicamide, or Paremyd (1% hydroxyamphetamine / 0.25% tropicamide). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint was percent of subjects returning to ≤0.2 mm greater than baseline pupil diameter in study eye at 90 minutes after POS administration. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and tolerability measures, including conjunctival hyperemia. RESULTS: In MIRA-2, 185 subjects were randomized to treatment with placebo (94) or POS (91). In MIRA-3, 368 subjects were randomized to treatment with placebo (124) or POS (244). A statistically significant greater percentage of subjects treated with POS had study eyes that showed reversal of mydriasis at 90 minutes (primary endpoint) compared with the placebo treatment (48.9% vs 6.6% for MIRA-2; p<0.0001 and 58% VS 6% for MIRA-3; p<0.0001) and as early as 60 minutes (24.5% vs 5.5% for MIRA-2; p<0.0003 and 42% VS 2% for MIRA-3; p<0.0001). Between 28 to 34% of placebo-treated subjects had not returned to baseline PD at 24 hours following pharmacological dilation compared to 8 to 11% treated with POS (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: POS treatment had a rapid onset in reducing PD within 60- to 90-minutes, with a statistically significant time savings of 3 to 4 hours to return to baseline PD compared to placebo. One or 2 drops of POS rapidly reversed mydriasis in all subjects regardless of mydriatic agent or iris color. More subjects receiving POS reported a perceived benefit in the resolution of visual symptoms caused by pharmacologically induced mydriasis compared to placebo, with statistically significant differences noted as early as 1 hour. The safety profile was favorable, with the most common adverse effects being mild transient conjunctival hyperemia (11.2%), instillation site discomfort (10.9%), and dysgeusia (3.6%).

Factors Considered by Experienced Urologists when Selecting Alpha-Blockers for Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia according to Age.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of the study were to examine the opinions of urology specialists on whether there are actual differences in efficacy among α1-blockers and to identify the factors that should be considered when prescribing these medications according to age. METHODS: We surveyed 50 South Korean urology specialists with over 3 years of clinical experience in secondary or tertiary hospitals in July-August 2021. The survey covered urologists' demographics, awareness of α1-blocker prescription differences, and key factors in α1-blocker selection based on LUTS severity and patient age. RESULTS: Overall, 82% of the respondents believed that there were differences in the efficacy of α1-blockers in actual practice according to age. Over 90% of the respondents agreed on the need for head-to-head comparison studies to compare the effects of different α1-blockers. Regardless of the severity of LUTS, urologists prioritize cardiovascular side effects when prescribing α1-blockers to patients aged ≥70 years. Further, 19% of the urologists prioritized ejaculatory side effects for mild-to-moderate LUTS and 9% for severe LUTS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of different α1-blockers are highly valuable for the real-world clinical application of α1-blockers. Notably, urologists prioritize cardiovascular and ejaculatory side effects in older and younger patients while prescribing α1-blockers, respectively.

Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm. The best drug for MET is still uncertain. In this review, we aim to compare the effectiveness of tadalafil and tamsulosin for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm in terms of stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET) and the side effect profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception until April 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Eleven publications with 1,330 patients were included. We observed that tadalafil has a higher SER (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.38;0.80, p=0.02, I2=52%) and the same efficacy in SET (MD 1.07, CI 95% -0.25; 2.39, p=0.11, I2=84%). No differences were found when comparing side effects as headache, backache, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects.

Persistent use of medical therapy after surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective database analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine how many men are able to remain off of medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) following surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: The TriNetX Analytics Network was used to identify men who were taking medical therapy for BPO (at least one of: alpha-1 blockers, anticholinergics, B3 agonists, or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors) and subsequently underwent surgery for BPO. They were then placed into one of six cohorts, classified based on the type of surgery they received: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), Laser vaporization of prostate (PVP), transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), water-vapor thermal therapy (WV), or Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). Our primary outcome was persistent use of medical therapy at 6-months-2-years postoperatively. Secondary outcome was surgical retreatment by 2 years postoperatively. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to control for various risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). RESULTS: A total of 21,475 men were identified who were on medical therapy and subsequently underwent surgery, which included 12,294 TURP, 5290 PVP, 397 WV, 1308 PUL, 346 TUIP, and 1840 LEP. Medication use between 6 months and 2 years after surgery was 38% for LEP, 50% for WV, 61% for TURP, 63% for PUL, 65% for TUIP and 66% for PVP. All surgical modalities had higher odds of using medications when compared to LEP (p < 0.001). This remained significant after PSM for 9 potentially confounding variables. CONCLUSION: A large percentage of men continue medical therapy after surgery for BPO. Amongst multiple surgical modalities available, LEP appears to have the highest rates of medication discontinuation after surgery. In men who wish to avoid medications or who have cardiac risk factors, a discussion with their urologist to select the best option to minimize medical therapy should occur.

Alpha-blockade during congenital heart surgery admissions: analysis from national database.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of alpha-blockade on haemodynamics during and following congenital heart surgery are well documented, but data on patient outcomes, mortality, and hospital charges are limited. The purpose of this study was to characterise the use of alpha-blockade during congenital heart surgery admissions and to determine its association with common clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System database. De-identified data for patients under 18 years of age with a cardiac diagnosis who underwent congenital heart surgery were obtained from 2004 to 2015. Patients were subdivided on the basis of receiving alpha-blockade with either phenoxybenzamine or phentolamine during admission or not. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using Mann−Whitney U-tests and Fisher exact tests, respectively. Characteristics between subgroups were compared using univariate analysis. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the impact of alpha-blockade on ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, billed charges, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 81,313 admissions, 4309 (5.3%) utilised alpha-blockade. Phentolamine was utilised in 4290 admissions. In univariate analysis, ICU length of stay, total length of stay, inpatient mortality, and billed charges were all significantly higher in the alpha-blockade admissions. However, regression analyses demonstrated that other factors were behind these increased. Alpha-blockade was significantly, independently associated with a 1.5 days reduction in ICU length of stay (p < 0.01) and a 3.5 days reduction in total length of stay (p < 0.01). Alpha-blockade was significantly, independently associated with a reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.7−0.9). Alpha-blockade was not independently associated with any significant change in billed charges. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-blockade is used in a subset of paediatric cardiac surgeries and is independently associated with significant reductions in ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality without significantly altering billed charges.

Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy (MET) is well established. However, it is not known which of the three most commonly used alpha-blockers (tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin) is the most efficacious. With this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of the three commonly used alpha-blockers as MET for distal ureter stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this review, we searched multiple databases such as PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, OviD SP, CINAHL, and web of science to identify all the relevant randomized studies comparing the efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin, and silodosin. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews for network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were followed while conducting this review and the study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020175706). RESULTS: In this review, 31 studies with 7077 patients were included. Compared to placebo all the treatment groups were more effective for both stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET). For both SER and SET, silodosin had the highest SUCRA (94.8 and 90.4) values followed by alfuzosin (58.8 and 64.9) and tamsulosin (46.2 and 44.5). The incidence of postural hypotension was similar with all the drugs, whereas, the incidence of retrograde ejaculation was significantly higher for silodosin. Overall confidence for each comparison group in this review ranged from "very low" to "moderate" according to the CINeMA approach. CONCLUSION: Among the three commonly used alpha-blockers silodosin is the most efficacious drug as MET for lower ureter stones followed by alfuzosin and tamsulosin.

Cardiac Failure Associated with Medical Therapy of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Population Based Study.

PURPOSE: Increased risk of cardiac failure with α-blockers in hypertension studies and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in prostate studies have raised safety concerns for long term management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The objective of this study was to determine if these medications are associated with an increased risk of cardiac failure in routine care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This population based study used administrative databases including all men over 66 with a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia between 2005 and 2015. Men were categorized based on 5-alpha reductase inhibitor exposure and/or α-blocker exposure with a primary outcome of new cardiac failure utilizing competing risk models. Explanatory variables examined included exposure thresholds, formulations, age, and comorbidities associated with cardiac disease. RESULTS: The data set included 175,201 men with a benign prostatic hyperplasia diagnosis with 8,339, 55,383, and 41,491 exposed to 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, α-blocker and combination therapy, respectively. Men treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor and α-blocker, alone or in combination, had a statistically increased risk of being diagnosed with cardiac failure compared to no medication use. Cardiac failure risk was highest for α-blockers alone (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.18-1.26), intermediate for combination α-blockers/5-alpha reductase inhibitors (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.12-1.21) and lowest for 5-alpha reductase inhibitors alone (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17). Nonselective α-blocker had a higher risk of cardiac failure than selective α-blockers (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.00-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: In routine care, men with a benign prostatic hyperplasia diagnosis and exposed to both 5-alpha reductase inhibitor and α-blocker therapy had an increased association with cardiac failure, with the highest risk for men exposed to nonselective α-blockers.

[Role of alphablockers in women: Systematic review]. / Place des alphabloquants chez la femme : revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Marketing authorization of alphablockers is limited principally to men with benign hypertrophy of prostate. The objective of this review is to evaluate clinical and urodynamic improvement of alphablockers in women. METHOD: A review of the literature was carried out on all prospective studies about the use of alphablockers in women with urination disorders. RESULTS: Seventeen articles have been included. The selected articles were classified according to the studied population: lower urinary tract disorders, bladder emptying disorders without details on mechanism, bladder outlet obstruction, detrusor hypoactivity overactive bladder. Four studies were randomized against placebo. There was an improvement in the IPSS in 8 studies going as far as a decrease of 11,7 points (4.6 vs. 16.3 P<0.05). The voiding IPSS subscore was improved overall in 8 studies with a decrease of up to 6,2 points (9.6±5.5 vs. 14.8±4 P<0.01). Two trials showed an improvement of clinical scores versus placebo with an improvement of IPSS from -11.7 vs -9.5 (P<0.05) and -5.6 vs -2.6 (P<0.05). Urodynamic parameters were also often improved with a decrase of Qmax going to+5.8mL/s (P<0.05). Alphablocker also appear to improve non obstructive voiding disorders. The benefit in overactive bladder seems limited. CONCLUSION: Alphablockers may be indicated in voiding disorders of women. Their exact role must be established.

Impact of 5α-reductase inhibitor and α-blocker therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia on prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) and α-blockers among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in relation to prostate cancer (PCa) incidence, severity and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective 20-year cohort study in men residing in Saskatchewan, aged 40-89 years, with a BPH-coded medical claim between 1995 and 2014, was conducted. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare incidence of PCa diagnosis, metastatic PCa, Gleason score 8-10 PCa, and PCa mortality among 5ARI users (n = 4 571), α-blocker users (n = 7 764) and non-users (n = 11 677). RESULTS: In comparison with both non-users and α-blocker users, 5ARI users had a ~40% lower risk of a PCa diagnosis (11.0% and 11.4% vs 5.8%, respectively), and α-blocker users had an 11% lower risk of a PCa diagnosis compared with non-users. Overall, the incidence of metastatic PCa and PCa mortality was not significantly different among 5ARI or α-blocker users compared with non-users (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] of metastatic PCa: 1.12 and 1.13, respectively, and PCa mortality: 1.11 and 1.18, respectively, P > 0.05 for both drugs), but both 5ARI and a-blocker users had ~30% higher risk of Gleason score 8-10 cancer, adjusted HR 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.82, P = 0.03, and adjusted HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.59, P = 0.02, respectively compared with non-users. CONCLUSION: The use of 5ARIs was associated with lower risk of PCa diagnosis, regardless of comparison group. Risk of high grade PCa was higher among both 5ARI users and α-blocker users compared with non-users; however, this did not translate into higher risk of PCa mortality.

Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) commonly affect older men. Age-related changes associated with metabolic disturbances, changes in hormone balance, and chronic inflammation may cause BPH development. The diagnosis of BPH hinges on a thorough medical history and focused physical examination, with attention to other conditions that may be causing LUTS. Digital rectal examination and urinalysis should be performed. Other testing may be considered depending on presentation of symptoms, including prostate-specific antigen, serum creatinine, urine cytology, imaging, cystourethroscopy, post-void residual, and pressure-flow studies. Many medical and surgical treatment options exist. Surgery should be reserved for patients who either have failed medical management or have complications from BPH, such as recurrent urinary tract infections, refractory urinary retention, bladder stones, or renal insufficiency as a result of obstructive uropathy.

The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: Excessive bulking force during primary access of the ureteral access sheath may induce ureteral injury. We investigated the efficacy of preoperative α-blockade to reduce ureteral access sheath insertion force and determine the upper limit required to avoid ureteral injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial 135 patients from a single institution who had ureteropelvic junction or renal pelvis stones and were scheduled to undergo retrograde intrarenal surgery were prospectively enrolled from December 2015 to January 2017. Of the patients 41 and 42 were randomly assigned to the control and experimental groups, respectively. The experimental group received α-blockade preoperatively. The 21 patients who were pre-stented were assessed separately. We developed a homemade device to measure maximal ureteral access sheath insertion force. RESULTS: Our ureteral access sheath insertion force measurement device showed excellent reproducibility. Higher insertion velocity resulted in greater maximal sheath insertion force. Maximal insertion force in the α-blockade group was significantly lower than in the control group at the ureterovesical junction (p = 0.008) and the proximal ureter (p = 0.036). Maximal insertion force in the α-blockade group was comparable to that in pre-stented patients. Female patients and patients 70 years old or older showed a lower maximal ureteral access sheath insertion force than their counterparts. The rate of grade 2 or greater ureteral injury was lower in the α-blockade group than in controls (p = 0.038). No injury occurred in any case in which ureteral access sheath insertion force did not exceed 600 G. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative α-blockade and slow sheath placement may reduce maximal ureteral access sheath insertion force. If the force exceeds 600 G, a smaller diameter sheath may be an alternative. Alternatively the procedure can be terminated and followed later by pre-stented retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Bladder Cancer Survival of Men Receiving 5α-Reductase Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Androgens may have a role in bladder carcinogenesis. We studied whether 5α-reductase inhibitors were associated with bladder cancer specific mortality in a population based cohort of men with bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 10,720 Finnish men with bladder cancer newly diagnosed in 1997 to 2012 who were identified in a national cancer registry. Median followup was 4.17 years after bladder cancer diagnosis. We analyzed the HR and 95% CI of the risk of bladder cancer death by 5α-reductase inhibitor administration using Cox regression adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, primary bladder cancer treatment and tumor extent at diagnosis. Lag time analyses were performed to assess the long-term risk association. Simultaneous administration α-blockers was considered to estimate possible confounding by indication. RESULTS: Administering 5α-reductase inhibitors before bladder cancer diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of bladder cancer death (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). The risk decrease became stronger with years of use. Conversely prediagnostic administration of α-blockers was not associated with bladder cancer survival (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.13). Similarly 5α-reductase inhibitor administration after diagnosis was associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer death (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88). Bladder cancer survival was not associated with α-blockers (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.07). The risk decrease due to 5α-reductase inhibitors persisted up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive 5α-reductase inhibitors have improved disease specific survival after bladder cancer diagnosis compared to those who do not receive them while α-blockers were not associated with survival. This supports the benefits of 5α-reductase inhibitors in bladder cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Desmopressin Add-On Therapy for Men with Persistent Nocturia on α-Blocker Monotherapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of desmopressin add-on therapy for men with persistent nocturia on α-blocker for lower urinary tract symptoms in this placebo controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included men 40 to 65 years old with lower urinary tract symptoms and persistent nocturia despite α-blocker therapy for at least 8 weeks. Patients were randomized to once daily placebo or desmopressin 0.2 mg for 8 weeks. The primary end point was to assess changes in the mean number of nocturia episodes from baseline to the final assessment. Other secondary end points and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: A total of 86 patients were randomized to treatment, including placebo in 39 and desmopressin 0.2 mg in 47. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The desmopressin add-on group was significantly superior to placebo in terms of the change from baseline in the mean number of nocturia episodes (-1.13 ± 0.92 vs -0.68 ± 0.79, p = 0.034), the changes in nocturnal urine volume (p <0.001), total I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) (p = 0.041), the nocturnal polyuria index (p = 0.001) and ICIQ-N (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Nocturia) (p = 0.001), and the willingness to continue (p = 0.025). The incidence of adverse events in the desmopressin add-on group was similar to that in the placebo group. Most adverse events were mild. CONCLUSION: Desmopressin add-on therapy in men 40 to 65 years old with persistent nocturia on α-blocker monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms is effective and well tolerated.

Effects of Withdrawing α1-Blocker from Combination Therapy with α1-Blocker and 5α-Reductase Inhibitor in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective and Comparative Trial Using Urodynamics.

PURPOSE: We compared the effects on lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction of combination therapy with α1-blocker and 5α-reductase inhibitor or a switch to 5α-reductase inhibitor monotherapy. We determined the factors influencing changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after α1-blocker withdrawal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 outpatients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia received combination therapy with silodosin 8 mg per day and dutasteride 0.5 mg per day for 12 months. Of the patients 132 were randomized to continue combination therapy or switched to dutasteride monotherapy through silodosin withdrawal as the monotherapy group. Parameter changes from before randomization to 12 months after randomization were assessed based on subjective symptoms and urodynamic findings of voiding and storage function. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis included 57 patients on combination therapy and 60 on monotherapy. The change in I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) after randomization was -0.7 and -0.6 in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively. The bladder outlet obstruction index changed from 46.1 to 41.8 in the combination therapy group and from 42.9 to 39.9 in the monotherapy group. No significant differences in subjective symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction were observed between the 2 groups. However, storage function decreased in the monotherapy group and lower urinary tract symptoms deteriorated significantly after the switch to dutasteride monotherapy in patients with a higher body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: We found that α1-blocker withdrawal from combination therapy was reasonable and tolerable with regard to the effect on lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. However, withdrawal must be performed carefully in patients with a high body mass index.

A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tamsulosin monotherapy and its combination with mirabegron for overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic obstruction.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of add-on treatment with a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist (mirabegron) for overactive bladder symptoms remaining after α1-blocker (tamsulosin) treatment in men with benign prostatic obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with benign prostatic obstruction with urinary urgency at least once per week and a total OABSS of 3 or more points after 8 or more weeks of treatment with tamsulosin were enrolled in the study. They were randomly allocated to receive 0.2 mg tamsulosin daily or 0.2 mg tamsulosin and 50 mg mirabegron daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was change in total OABSS. Safety assessments included change in post-void residual urine volume and adverse events. RESULTS: From January 2012 through September 2013 a total of 94 patients were randomized. Of these patients 76 completed the protocol treatment. In the full analysis set the change in total OABSS during the treatment period was significantly greater in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (-2.21 vs -0.87, p=0.012). The changes in scores for urinary urgency, daytime frequency, International Prostate Symptom Score storage symptom subscore and quality of life index at 8 weeks were significantly greater in the combination group. The change in post-void residual urine volume was significantly greater in the combination group. Although 6 patients experienced adverse events in the combination group, urinary retention was observed in only 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Combined tamsulosin and mirabegron treatment is effective and safe for patients with benign prostatic obstruction who have overactive bladder symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy.

Comparison of efficacy and tolerance of short-duration open-ended ureteral catheter drainage and tamsulosin administration to indwelling double J stents following ureteroscopic removal of stones.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of short-duration, open-ended ureteral catheter drainage as a replacement to indwelling stent, and to study the effect of tamsulosin on stent-induced pain and storage symptoms following uncomplicated ureteroscopic removal of stones. DESIGN: Prospective randomised study. SETTING: School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent ureteroscopic removal of stones for lower ureteral stones between November 2011 and January 2014 were randomly assigned into three groups. Patients in group 1 (n=33) were stented with 5-French double J stent for 2 weeks. Patients in group 2 (n=35) were administered tablet tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily for 2 weeks in addition to stenting, and those in group 3 (n=31) underwent 5-French open-ended ureteral catheter drainage for 48 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were evaluated for flank pain using visual analogue scale scores at days 1, 2, 7, and 14, and for storage (irritative) bladder symptoms using International Prostate Symptom Score on days 7 and 14, and for quality-of-life score (using International Prostate Symptom Score) on day 14. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients, visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower for groups 2 and 3 (P<0.0001). The International Prostate Symptom Scores for all parameters were lower in patients from groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 both on days 7 and 14 (P<0.0001). Analgesic requirements were similar in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Open-ended ureteral catheter drainage is equally effective and better tolerated than routine stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic removal of stones. Tamsulosin reduces storage symptoms and improves quality of life after ureteral stenting.

Effect of perioperative tamsulosin on successful ureteral access sheath placement and stent-related symptom relief: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of administering tamsulosin before surgery on the successful insertion of a 12/14 French (F) ureteral access sheath (UAS) during the procedure, as well as the impact of preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use on symptoms related to the ureteral stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 200 patients who underwent unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg) or placebo 1 week before surgery until stent removal. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group 1 received tamsulosin throughout the study period. Group 2 received tamsulosin before surgery and placebo after surgery. Group 3 received placebo before surgery and tamsulosin after surgery. Group 4 received placebo before and after surgery. The USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) was completed between postoperative days 7 and 14 immediately before stent removal. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in this analysis. Their mean age was 55.0±11.0 years, and 48 patients (30.0%) were female. In the group that received preoperative tamsulosin, the success rate of 12/14F UAS deployment was significantly higher than that of the preoperative placebo group (88.0 vs. 75.3%, p=0.038). Preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to the ureteral stent. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that preoperative administration of tamsulosin improved the success of larger-sized UAS, whereas preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to ureteral stents.

Medical expulsive therapy versus early endoscopic stone removal for acute renal colic: an instrumental variable analysis.

PURPOSE: The use of medical expulsive therapy to hasten stone passage potentially decreases expenditures around episodes of renal colic. However, these efficiency gains may be mitigated if patients treated with medical expulsive therapy have frequent health care encounters due to pain while waiting for the stones to pass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using claims data (2002 to 2006) we identified adult men with acute renal colic. We compared 6-week payments as well as frequency of hospitalization and emergency department revisits associated with an initial course of medical expulsive therapy with those for early endoscopic stone removal. To account for unmeasured confounding we performed an instrumental variable analysis, exploiting variation in recommended treatments based on the day of the week that a patient's first emergency department visit occurred. RESULTS: Overall 1,835 and 4,397 men underwent medical expulsive therapy or early endoscopic stone removal, respectively. Although minimal differences existed between men with respect to the day of the week of emergency department presentation, weekend encounters were strongly associated with receiving medical expulsive therapy (p <0.001). Two-stage least squares regression revealed 6-week payments to be tenfold lower for men on medical expulsive therapy who were candidates for either treatment (p <0.001). While there was no difference in frequency of hospitalization, these men were more likely to have a repeat emergency department visit compared to those who underwent endoscopic stone removal (68.8% vs 39.6%, respectively, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Findings on medical expulsive therapy are mixed, with lower 6-week payments but more frequent repeat emergency department visits. These data inform patients who are candidates for medical expulsive therapy or endoscopic stone removal when making decisions about their care.

The efficacy and safety of combined therapy with α-blockers and anticholinergics for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We performed a meta-analysis to compare treatment with α-blockers and anticholinergics (ie combination therapy) to α-blocker monotherapy to clarify the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach among men with storage urinary symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched for trials of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms that were randomized to combination treatment or α-blockers alone. We pooled data from 7 placebo controlled trials meeting inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes of interest included changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (storage subscores) and urinary frequency. We also assessed post-void residual volume, maximal flow rate and the incidence of urinary retention. Data were pooled using random effects models for continuous outcomes and the Peto method to generate odds ratios for acute urinary retention. RESULTS: Combination therapy had a significantly greater reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score storage subscores (Δ -0.73, 95% CI -1.09 - -0.37) and voiding frequency (Δ -0.69 voids, 95% CI -0.97 - -0.41). There was also a greater reduction in maximal urinary flow rate (Δ -0.59 ml per second, 95% CI -1.04 - -0.14) and increase in post-void residual urine volume (Δ 11.60 ml, 95% CI 8.50-14.70) with combination therapy. The number needed to treat with combination therapy to cause 1 acute urinary retention episode was 101 (95% CI 60-267). CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with α-blockers and anticholinergics significantly improved storage voiding parameters compared to men treated with α-blocker therapy alone. This treatment approach is safe with a minimal risk of increased post-void residual urine volume, decreased maximal urinary flow rate or acute urinary retention.