One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension.

When denosumab is discontinued, antiresorptive therapy is critical to reduce high-turnover bone loss. The ideal duration of antiresorptive therapy after denosumab is uncertain. This study demonstrates that both 1 and 2 years of alendronate maintained bone density gains achieved with 1 year of denosumab. BACKGROUND: When denosumab is discontinued, antiresorptive therapy is critical to attenuate high-turnover bone loss. The ideal choice and duration of antiresorptive therapy are not yet defined, however. In the Comparison of Alendronate or Raloxifene following Denosumab (CARD) study, we demonstrated that 12 months of alendronate was better able to maintain the bone mineral density (BMD) gains achieved with 12 months of denosumab versus 12 months of raloxifene. In this extension, we wished to determine if 12 months of alendronate would be sufficient in maintaining these denosumab-induced BMD gains. METHODS: In the CARD study, postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 60-79 at high fracture risk received 12 months of denosumab 60-mg SC every 6 months followed by 12 months of either alendronate 70 mg weekly (N = 26) or raloxifene (N = 25). All subjects in the alendronate arm were then offered participation in a 1-year extension in which they were randomized to continue alendronate for an additional 12 months (N = 10) or to receive calcium and vitamin D alone (N = 8). The primary outcome was change in spine BMD between months 24 and 36. Exploratory endpoints included changes in areal BMD (aBMD) at other anatomic sites as well as changes in serum bone turnover markers. RESULTS: The CARD study demonstrated the effectiveness of 12 months alendronate in preserving denosumab-induced BMD gains. In the extension, aBMD was maintained at the spine, total hip, and femoral neck in both those randomized to an additional year of alendronate and those randomized to calcium/vitamin D alone. We did, however, observe a transient comparative decrease between months 24-30 in the calcium/vitamin D group at the total hip (P = 0.008) and femoral neck (P = 0.040). At the end of 24 months of the CARD study, bone turnover markers serum c-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen N-propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) were suppressed in both groups and then increased more between months 24-36 in the calcium/vitamin D group than the alendronate group (P = 0.051 for CTX, P = 0.030 for P1NP). Both CTX and PINP remained below the month 0 baseline in both groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of our small sample size, these data suggest that both 1 and 2 years of alendronate effectively maintain BMD gains achieved with 1 year of denosumab and prevented any rebound in bone turnover marker levels above pre-denosumab baseline. This is the first randomized trial to assess minimum duration of bisphosphonate after short-term denosumab and may be helpful to guide clinical care. Similar studies performed after longer durations of denosumab would be helpful to further define optimal management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03623633.

Type 2 diabetes incidence in patients initiating denosumab or alendronate treatment: a primary care cohort study.

Denosumab initiation is related to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes than alendronate in anti-osteoporotic treatment-naïve users in primary care practices. PURPOSE: Links have been suggested between bone metabolism and glucose tolerance. Downregulation of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL) signaling improves glucose metabolism. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, may be associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim was to compare incidence rates of T2DM in primary care patients initiating denosumab or alendronate, which is a first-line therapy of osteoporosis. Alendronate as comparator enhances comparability of the two cohorts. METHOD: The IQVIA Disease Analyzer comprises a representative panel of general and specialist practices (Germany). A new-user comparative study was conducted among patients with denosumab or alendronate treatment (2010-2021) without history of diabetes and age ≥ 45 years. Incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR; 95%CI) for T2DM were estimated. RESULTS: The cohorts consisted of 3,354 denosumab (age: 75 years; women: 87%) and 27,068 alendronate (76 years; 86%) users. Overall, 1,038 persons developed T2D during 54,916 person-years. T2DM incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 11.9 (9.5-14.4) for denosumab and 20.1 (18.8-21.3) for alendronate users, respectively. Denosumab was associated with a reduced risk of T2DM compared to alendronate, adjusting for age, sex, index year, visits, obesity, comorbidities and statins (HR: 0.73; 0.58-0.89). CONCLUSION: In this comparative study of older patients seen in routine practices, denosumab was associated with a lower risk of developing T2DM than alendronate.

Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.

Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.

Pre-treatment bone turnover does not influence the level of the response to alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis at the bone tissue level.

PURPOSE: The main effect of anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates is a reduction of bone resorption, with a consequent marked decrease of bone turnover. This post-hoc analysis investigated the changes of histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after alendronate (ALN), according to the baseline turnover. METHODS: Ninety postmenopausal women underwent a transiliac bone biopsy before and after 6 (n = 44) or 12 (n = 46) months of treatment with ALN (70 mg/week). The dynamic parameters reflecting the bone formation and bone turnover were mineralizing surface (MS/BS; %), bone formation rate (BFR/BS; µm3/µm2/d), and activation frequency (Ac.f; /yr). Biochemical markers sPINP and the sCTX were assessed before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjects were divided into quartiles based on the baseline values of BFR/BS. RESULTS: At baseline, MS/BS and Ac.f were significantly different (p < 0.0001) among the BFR quartiles. sCTX and sP1NP were not significantly different among quartiles. After ALN treatment, MS/BS was not significantly different among quartiles but Ac.f remained significantly lower in the first quartile compared to the third and fourth ones (p < 0.03). The absolute value of the difference between pre- and post-treatment significantly correlated with the baseline BFR/BS but when expressed in percent of the baseline value, the magnitude of the diminutions of MS/BS, Ac.f, sCTX, and sP1NP was similar in the four baseline BFR quartiles. CONCLUSION: The percentage response to ALN appeared independent of the baseline level of bone turnover. After treatment, the bone turnover tended to be similar in all BFR quartiles. This analysis investigated the influence of baseline turnover measured by bone histomorphometry on the effect of alendronate. When expressed in percent of pre-treatment values, the decreases of histomorphometric parameters and biochemical markers of bone turnover were independent of the baseline turnover.

Predictors of discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment: sub-analysis of the Japanese osteoporosis intervention trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: To identify predictors of discontinuing treatment with teriparatide (TPTD) and alendronate (ALN), data from a randomized, controlled trial (JOINT-05) involving postmenopausal Japanese women at high risk of fracture were re-analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received sequential therapy with once-weekly TPTD for 72 weeks followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group) or monotherapy with ALN for 120 weeks (ALN group). Background data including comorbidities, fracture prevalence, cognitive function, quality of life, activities of daily living, bone metabolism parameters, and nutrient intake were collected. The endpoints were 3 types of discontinuations by the reason: a poor compliance, adverse events (AEs), or any reason including those unrelated to AEs or poor compliance. Odds ratios (ORs) of baseline predictors of discontinuation were evaluated by single or multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 234 (49.0%) patients in the TPTD-ALN group and 167 (34.2%) patients in the ALN group discontinued. In the TPTD-ALN group, a lower serum calcium level was a significant predictor of compliance-related discontinuation. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were lower in patients with lower serum calcium levels than with higher serum calcium levels. In the ALN group, poor cognitive function was significantly associated with compliance-related discontinuation, and higher body mass index and alcohol intake were predictors of AE-related discontinuation. Predictors of discontinuation were drug-specific. Lower serum calcium levels and poor cognitive function were predictors of discontinuing once-weekly TPTD and ALN, respectively. CONCLUSION: When starting TPTD and ALN treatment, careful attention to patients with lower serum calcium levels and poor cognitive function, respectively, may be needed for better treatment continuity.

Ångstrom-scale gold particles loaded with alendronate via alpha-lipoic acid alleviate bone loss in osteoporotic mice.

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent metabolic disease characterized by low systemic bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, resulting in reduced bone strength and increased fracture risk. Current treatment options for osteoporosis are limited by factors such as efficacy, cost, availability, side effects, and acceptability to patients. Gold nanoparticles show promise as an emerging osteoporosis therapy due to their osteogenic effects and ability to allow therapeutic delivery but have inherent constraints, such as low specificity and the potential for heavy metal accumulation in the body. This study reports the synthesis of ultrasmall gold particles almost reaching the Ångstrom (Ång) dimension. The antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid (LA) is used as a dispersant and stabilizer to coat Ångstrom-scale gold particles (AuÅPs). Alendronate (AL), an amino-bisphosphonate commonly used in drug therapy for osteoporosis, is conjugated through LA to the surface of AuÅPs, allowing targeted delivery to bone and enhancing antiresorptive therapeutic effects. In this study, alendronate-loaded Ångstrom-scale gold particles (AuÅPs-AL) were used for the first time to promote osteogenesis and alleviate bone loss through regulation of the WNT signaling pathway, as shown through in vitro tests. The in vivo therapeutic effects of AuÅPs-AL were demonstrated in an established osteoporosis mouse model. The results of Micro-computed Tomography, histology, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining indicated that AuÅPs-AL significantly improved bone density and prevented bone loss, with no evidence of nanoparticle-associated toxicity. These findings suggest the possible future application of AuÅPs-AL in osteoporosis therapy and point to the potential of developing new approaches for treating metabolic bone diseases using Ångstrom-scale gold particles.

Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic-related fractures represent an increasing burden to patients, health care systems and society. AIMS: This study estimated cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) followed by alendronate (ALN) compared to relevant alternative strategies in US men and women aged 50 to 80 years at very high fracture risk (bone mineral density T-score ≤ - 2.5 and a recent fracture). METHODS: A lifetime Markov-based microsimulation model was used to estimate healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparators were sequential treatment with unbranded teriparatide (TPTD)/ALN, generic ALN monotherapy, and no treatment. Analyses were conducted based on initial fracture site (hip, vertebral, or any fracture) and treatment efficacy data (derived from clinical trials or a recent network meta-analysis). RESULTS: From all analyses completed, sequential ABL/ALN demonstrated more QALYs for lower healthcare costs versus unbranded TPTD/ALN. No treatment was dominated (higher costs for less QALYs) versus ALN monotherapy. Sequential ABL/ALN resulted in favorable cost-effectiveness (at US threshold of $150,000/QALY) versus generic ALN monotherapy in men aged ≥ 50 years with any fracture type, women aged ≥ 65 years with any fracture type, and women aged ≥ 55 years having a hip or vertebral fracture. DISCUSSION: Similar cost-effectiveness of sequential ABL/ALN versus unbranded TPTD/ALN, ALN monotherapy, and no treatment was observed in both US men and women at very high fracture risk, with a moderate improvement in cost-effectiveness in men versus women and in patients with a hip or vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy with ABL/ALN was cost-effective in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.

Farnesyl Diphosphate Synthase Gene Associated with Loss of Bone Mass Density and Alendronate Treatment Failure in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis.

Aminobisphosphonates (NBPs) are the first-choice medication for osteoporosis (OP); NBP treatment aims at increasing bone mineral density (BMD) by inhibiting the activity of farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS) enzyme in osteoclasts. Despite its efficacy, inadequate response to the drug and side effects have been reported. The A allele of the rs2297480 (A > C) SNP, found in the regulatory region of the FDPS gene, is associated with reduced gene transcription. This study evaluates the FDPS variant rs2297480 (A > C) association with OP patients' response to alendronate sodium treatment. A total of 304 OP patients and 112 controls were enrolled; patients treated with alendronate sodium for two years were classified, according to BMD variations at specific regions (lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH), as responders (OP-R) (n = 20) and non-responders (OP-NR) (n = 40). We observed an association of CC genotype with treatment failure (p = 0.045), followed by a BMD decrease in the regions L1-L4 (CC = -2.21% ± 2.56; p = 0.026) and TH (CC = -2.06% ± 1.84; p = 0.015) after two years of alendronate sodium treatment. Relative expression of the FDPS gene was also evaluated in OP-R and OP-NR patients. Higher expression of the FDPS gene was also observed in OP-NR group (FC = 1.84 ± 0.77; p = 0.006) when compared to OP-R. In conclusion, the influence observed of FDPS expression and the rs2897480 variant on alendronate treatment highlights the importance of a genetic approach to improve the efficacy of treatment for primary osteoporosis.

Luminescent Alendronic Acid-Conjugated Micellar Nanostructures for Potential Application in the Bone-Targeted Delivery of Cholecalciferol.

Vitamin D, an essential micronutrient crucial for skeletal integrity and various non-skeletal physiological functions, exhibits limited bioavailability and stability in vivo. This study is focused on the development of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-grafted phospholipid micellar nanostructures co-encapsulating vitamin D3 and conjugated with alendronic acid, aimed at active bone targeting. Furthermore, these nanostructures are rendered optically traceable in the UV-visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum via the simultaneous encapsulation of vitamin D3 with carbon dots, a newly emerging class of fluorescents, biocompatible nanoparticles characterized by their resistance to photobleaching and environmental friendliness, which hold promise for future in vitro bioimaging studies. A systematic investigation is conducted to optimize experimental parameters for the preparation of micellar nanostructures with an average hydrodynamic diameter below 200 nm, ensuring colloidal stability in physiological media while preserving the optical luminescent properties of the encapsulated carbon dots. Comprehensive chemical-physical characterization of these micellar nanostructures is performed employing optical and morphological techniques. Furthermore, their binding affinity for the principal inorganic constituent of bone tissue is assessed through a binding assay with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, indicating significant potential for active bone-targeting. These formulated nanostructures hold promise for novel therapeutic interventions to address skeletal-related complications in cancer affected patients in the future.

The effect of antiresorptive therapy on the prevalence and severity of oral lichen planus: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive therapy (AR) disrupts osseous homeostasis and can induce direct irritation over the gastrointestinal mucosa; however, its possible erosive effects on the oral epithelium have not been totally described. Among the most frequent oral erosive lesions, oral lichen planus (OLP) frequently presents as painful mucosal ulcerations, arising from basal membrane inflammatory damage. Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to describe the association between AR and the incidence of OLP. METHODS: This case-control study included data from 148 patients (17 patients undergoing AR therapy (AR group) / 131 without AR therapy (Control group)). Each patient record was systematically processed and the association between AR drugs and OLP clinical characteristics within both groups was assessed. RESULTS: The erosive form of OLP was significantly more frequent in the AR group than in the Control group (p = 0.029). Indeed, the AR treatment using alendronic acid (41.2%) was the most frequently reported. Additionally, the erosive form of OLP showed the strongest association with pain and burning sensation among the OLP types (p < 0.050). However, disease worsening and AR consumption were not significantly associated (p = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: Patients under AR therapy show more clinical symptoms associated to the erosive type of OLP. Regardless of the AR therapy, the erosive type of OLP is associated with more severe symptoms.

Sequential therapy with once-weekly teriparatide injection followed by alendronate versus monotherapy with alendronate alone in patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture: final results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05.

In this randomized, controlled trial, sequential therapy with once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide for 72 weeks, followed by alendronate for 48 weeks resulted in a significantly lower incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture than monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks in women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. PURPOSE: To determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of sequential therapy with teriparatide, followed by alendronate is superior to that of monotherapy with alendronate, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial was performed. METHODS: Japanese women aged at least 75 years were eligible for the study, if they had primary osteoporosis and if they were at high risk of fracture. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the sequential therapy (once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide 56.5 µg for 72 weeks, followed by alendronate for 48 weeks) or monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. The primary endpoint in the final analysis was the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture during the 120-week follow-up period. RESULTS: Between October 2014 and June 2020, 505 patients in the sequential therapy group and 506 in the monotherapy group were enrolled. Of these, 489 and 496, respectively, were included in the main analysis. The incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture during the 120-week follow-up period in the sequential therapy group (64 per 627.5 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1020) was significantly lower than that in the monotherapy group (126 per 844.2 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1492), with a rate ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.88, P < 0.01). After 72 weeks, no patient had a severe adverse event that was considered related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: Once-weekly injection of teriparatide, followed by alendronate resulted in a significantly lower incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture than alendronate monotherapy in women with osteoporosis who were at high risk of fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER, DATE OF REGISTRATION: jRCTs031180235 and UMIN000015573, March 12, 2019.

Fracture risk in women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate versus immediate release risedronate or alendronate: a claims data analysis in the USA.

The study results indicate that women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate have a lower risk of fracture than those initiated on immediate release risedronate or alendronate. A large proportion of women discontinued all oral bisphosphonate therapies within 1 year of treatment start. PURPOSE: Using a US claims database (2009-2019), we compared risk of fractures between women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant (GR) risedronate and those initiated on (a) immediate release (IR) risedronate or (b) immediate release alendronate. METHODS: Women aged ≥ 60 years with osteoporosis who had ≥ 2 oral bisphosphonate prescription fills were followed for ≥ 1 year after the first observed bisphosphonates dispensing (index date). Fracture risk was compared between the GR risedronate and IR risedronate/alendronate cohorts using adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), both overall and in subgroups with high fracture risk due to older age or comorbidity/medications. Site-specific fractures were identified based on diagnosis codes recorded on medical claims using a claims-based algorithm. Persistence on bisphosphonate therapy was evaluated for all groups. RESULTS: aIRRs generally indicated lower fracture risk for GR risedronate than IR risedronate and alendronate. When comparing GR risedronate to IR risedronate, statistically significant aIRRs (p < 0.05) were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRRs = 0.37), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.63 and 0.41), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.69 and 0.24), and for pelvic fracture among high-risk women due to comorbidity/medications (aIRR = 0.34). When comparing GR risedronate to alendronate, statistically significant aIRRs were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRR = 0.54), for any fracture and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.73 and 0.63), and for any fracture, pelvic, and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.72, 0.36, and 0.58). In all cohorts, ~ 40% completely discontinued oral bisphosphonates within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation rates of oral bisphosphonate therapy were high. However, women initiated on GR risedronate had a significantly lower risk of fracture for several skeletal sites than women initiated on IR risedronate/alendronate, particularly those aged ≥ 70 years.

Alendronate induces skeletal alterations in the chicken embryonic development model.

Alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, has reported long-term clinical success in the management of distinct bone-related conditions, particularly in the modulation of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Nonetheless, whether the inhibitory activity over osteoclastic cells' functionality is widely acknowledged, contradictory evidence arises from the assessment of alendronate activity over osteoblastic populations. This may be of particular relevance in situations in which bone formation exceeds bone resorption, with further emphasis on embryonic development, since alendronate can cross the placental barrier and alendronate-based therapies are being extended into women of reproductive age. Accordingly, the present study aims to assess the effects of alendronate, at distinct concentrations (1.5E-10M to 1.5E-7M) on bone tissue development, within a translational animal model - the embryonic chicken development model. Embryos, at the beginning of osteogenesis (day 7) were exposed to different alendronate concentrations for 4 days. Embryos were following characterized for skeletal development by histomorphometric analysis upon histochemical staining, microtomographic analysis, and gene expression assessment of genes related to osteoclastogenic/osteoclastic and osteoblastogenic/osteogenic differentiation, as well as to the immuno-inflammatory activation. The findings revealed that exposure to alendronate had a dose-dependent impact on skeletal growth and mineralization. This effect was evidenced by diminished bone volume and reduced bone surface parameters, with the 1.5E-7M concentration leading to a remarkable reduction of over 50%. Additionally, a decreased osteoclastogenic/osteoclastic gene expression was verified, associated with a diminished osteoblastogenic/osteogenic program - within the 30-50% range for 1.5E-7 M, supporting the diminished bone formation process. An increased inflammatory activation may contribute, at least in part, to the attained outcomes. Overall present findings suggest a negative influence of alendronate on the embryonic bone development process in a dose-dependent manner, highlighting the potential risk of alendronate use during embryonic development.

The Effect of Effervescent and Buffered Alendronate Compared to Conventional Alendronate on Markers of Bone Turnover: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial.

Buffered and effervescent alendronate (ALN-EFF) increases gastric pH and is reported to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal side effects compared to conventional formulations of alendronate (ALN). The clinical effectiveness of ALN-EFF, however, has not been investigated. This study aims to investigate if ALN-EFF is non-inferior to ALN in suppressing bone turnover markers (BTM). We conducted a 16-week prospective, randomized, open-label study comprising 64 postmenopausal women with BMD T-score < -1 naïve to osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomized 1:1 to ALN or ALN-EFF. We collected blood samples at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Non-inferiority margin was determined as 12% (80% of efficacy retained), and an SD of 15% on change in CTx. CTx decreased by 58.2% ± 24.1% in the ALN group and by 46.9% ± 23.3% (CI - 38.42:- 55.35) in the ALN-EFF group (p = 0.08). The non-inferiority limit was 46.6%. With ALN-EFF the CI crosses the non-inferiority limit thus the test for non-inferiority was indeterminate. PINP decreased by 45.7 ± 22.6% in the ALN group and by 35.1 ± 20.7% in the ALN-EFF group (p = 0.07). Changes over time in the BTMs were not significantly different between the groups, p > 0.10 for both CTx and PINP. There was no difference in frequency of AEs or compliance between the two groups, but rate of discontinuation was lower with ALN-EFF. In conclusion, suppression of BTMs was not significantly different between the groups but formal non-inferiority could not be established.

Orbital myositis induced by alendronate: A case report.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates are widely used, notably for osteoporosis treatment. Their common side effects are well known. However, they can trigger less common effects such as orbital inflammation. Here, the case is reported of an orbital myositis triggered by alendronate. METHODS: This is a case report at an academic medical center. An orbital magnetic resonance imaging scan, a thoraco-abdominal computed tomography scan and blood sample analyses were performed. RESULTS: A 66-year-old woman treated by alendronate for her osteoporosis was investigated. She developed an orbital myositis after the first intake. Neurological examination revealed a painful diplopia with decreased downward and adduction movements of the right eye and edema of the upper eyelid. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging showed an orbital myositis of the right eye. No other cause of orbital myositis was found than the alendronate intake. After alendronate arrest and a short course of prednisone, the symptoms resolved. CONCLUSION: This case highlights that alendronate can cause an orbital myositis whose early diagnosis is of major importance because it is a treatable side effect.

Effects of bisphosphonates and treadmill exercise on bone and kidney in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease rats.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the aging of society has highlighted the need for development of effective treatments for elderly patients. This study examined whether the combination of treadmill exercise therapy and alendronate (ALN) can improve bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strength without worsening renal function in adenine-induced CKD model rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 8-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 70) were divided into experimental groups based on the treatment protocol, i.e., non-CKD (control), vehicle only (CKD), ALN only, exercise only, and combined ALN plus exercise. A 0.75% adenine diet was used to induce CKD. Groups were killed at either 20 or 30 weeks of age. Comprehensive assessments included serum and urine biochemistry tests, renal histology, bone histomorphometry, BMD measurement, micro-computed tomography examinations, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Blood biochemistry tests, urine analyses and histological evaluations of the kidney demonstrated that ALN treatment did not worsen renal function or kidney fibrosis in moderate-stage CKD model rats. Both ALN and treadmill exercise significantly suppressed bone resorption (p < 0.05-p < 0.01). Moreover, ALN monotherapy and combined ALN and treadmill exercise significantly improved BMD of the lumbar spine and femur, bone microstructure, and trabecular bone strength (p < 0.05-p < 0.01). Treadmill exercise was also shown to decrease cortical porosity at the mid-diaphysis of the femur and improve kidney fibrosis. CONCLUSION: The combination of ALN and treadmill exercise is effective in improving BMD, the microstructure of trabecular and cortical bone, and bone strength, without compromising renal function in adenine-induced CKD model rats.

Reliability of early stage symptoms/clinical findings of osteonecrosis of the jaw: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the differences in the incidence rates of suspected stage 0/1 osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and incidence risk of relevant clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ between patients treated with sequential therapy comprising weekly teriparatide for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks vs. those who received monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Suspected stage 0/1 ONJ was defined by non-specific symptoms. Tooth mobility and periodontal symptoms (gingival bleeding, swelling, and/or pain) were selected as clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ. Poisson regression models were applied to calculate the incidence rate ratios of suspected stage 0/1 between the teriparatide group (TG) and alendronate group (AG). Generalized linear models were used to calculate the risk ratios of clinical findings between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one participants in the TG and 344 in the AG answered a structured questionnaire on oral health and were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence rate of suspected stage 0/1 ONJ at both 72 and 120 weeks. The risk ratio of the TG to AG for tooth mobility was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.88, p = 0.02) at 72 weeks and 0.90 (95% CI 0.40-2.03, p = 0.83) at 120 weeks. The incidence rate of tooth mobility related to periodontal symptoms decreased in the TG and increased in the AG during the study. CONCLUSION: Tooth mobility accompanied by clinical periodontal symptoms may be a useful early sign of stage 0 ONJ.

Quercetin potentiates the anti-osteoporotic effects of alendronate through modulation of autophagy and apoptosis mechanisms in ovariectomy-induced bone loss rat model.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a bone disease leading to bone fracture and affects 200 million women worldwide. Autophagy and apoptosis are two fundamental mechanisms that are involved in the development of osteoporosis. In this study we aim to investigate the combined effects of quercetin and alendronate on the markers of osteoporosis, autophagy, and apoptosis in the bone of ovariectomized rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized and treated with alendronate alone (5 µg/kg/day) or alendronate (5 µg/kg/day) in combination with quercetin (15 mg/kg/day) for 12 weeks. Then, ELISA, stereological tests, Real-time PCR analysis, and immunofluorescence assay were used to measure the markers of osteoporosis, autophagy, and apoptosis in the serum and tibia of rats. The serum osteocalcin was significantly decreased in ovariectomized rats that received quercetin and alendronate compared with alendronate only. Stereological data showed that except for osteoclasts, the total trabecular volume, bone weight, bone volume, osteocyte, and osteoblast numbers were increased in an ovariectomized group that was treated with quercetin and alendronate compared with alendronate alone. Except for Bcl2, the autophagy markers (Beclin-1 and LC3B) and Caspase-3 were significantly downregulated in ovariectomized rats that received quercetin and alendronate compared with those treated with alendronate alone. CONCLUSION: Our results show that quercetin enhances the anti-osteoporotic effects of alendronate, possibly through the regulation of autophagy and apoptosis mechanisms. These findings suggest that the combination of quercetin and alendronate could be a useful therapeutic strategy in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Breast Cancer Exosomal microRNAs Facilitate Pre-Metastatic Niche Formation in the Bone: A Mathematical Model.

Pre-metastatic niche is a location where cancer cells, separating from a primary tumor, find "fertile soil" for growth and proliferation, ensuring successful metastasis. Exosomal miRNAs of breast cancer are known to enter the bone and degrade it, which facilitates cancer cells invasion into the bone interior and ensures its successful colonization. In this paper, we use a mathematical model to first describe, in health, the continuous remodeling of the bone by bone-forming osteoblasts, bone-resorbing osteoclasts and the RANKL-OPG-RANK signaling system, which keeps the balance between bone formation and bone resorption. We next demonstrate how breast cancer exosomal miRNAs disrupt this balance, either by increasing or by decreasing the ratio of osteoclasts/osteoblasts, which results in abnormal high bone resorption or abnormal high bone forming, respectively, and in bone weakening in both cases. Finally we consider the case of abnormally high resorption and evaluate the effect of drugs, which may increase bone density to normal level, thus protecting the bone from invasion by cancer cells.

Sequential treatment of teriparatide and alendronate versus alendronate alone for elevation of bone mineral density and prevention of refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporosis: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty was the most common strategy for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. However, refracture after vertebroplasty also occurred and bone mineral density (BMD) was one of the main factors associated with refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. AIMS: To investigate the efficacy of a short-sequential treatment of teriparatide followed by alendronate on prevention of refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patients, and compare it with the therapy of alendronate alone. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2020, we recruited 165 female osteoporosis patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty who were assigned into sequential treatment of teriparatide followed by alendronate group (TPTD + ALN group) and alendronate alone group (ALN group). The vertebral fracture occurred during this process was also recorded in both the groups. A total of 105 participants completed the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, BMD and serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were compared between the two groups during 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The 105 patients were finally included, with 59 in ALN group and 46 in TPTD + ALN group. During 1-year follow-up, the vertebral refracture rate in TPTD + ALN group was much lower than that in ALN group (2.2% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.05). At 12 months, the BMDs at lumbar in TPTD + ALN group were significantly elevated when compared to the ALN group (0.65 ± 0.10 vs. 0.57 ± 0.07, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A short-sequential administration of teriparatide followed by alendronate was more effective in elevating the BMD and decreasing the refracture rate at 12-month follow-up, compared to the counterpart with alendronate alone.