Comparison of guidelines for biological ancillary materials used for the manufacture of gene and cellular therapy products in Asia.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Although biologiocal ancillay materials (AMs) have specific risk associated with their derivations, it plays key role to manufature cell and gene therapy (CGT) products. It is important to understand the regulation relevant to AMs for developers. METHODS: The authors investigated the guidelines and pharmacopeia (hereinafter referred to as "guidelines") for biological AMs used for the manufacture of CGT products in Asia (China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan). In addition, the authors benchmarked the relevant guidelines in the United States (US) and European Union (EU). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The guidelines could be classified into two types based on whether specific AMs are scoped: (i) general guidelines for risk assessment of AMs and (ii) guidelines for specific AMs. The authors compared the risk categories for each type of AM provided in the general guidelines between the US and China and the specific requirements for bovine serum and trypsin in the guidelines of China, Japan, Taiwan, US and EU. The authors further compiled in-depth descriptions of the respective regulations in China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. There is limited availability of some guidelines for specific AMs. Moreover, there are no common requirements established across the surveyed countries and regions. Therefore, the authors suggest a risk assessment approach for AMs with consideration of their biological origin and traceability, production steps applied and ability to control or remove AMs from the final medicinal product over the CGT manufacturing process.

Towards a common framework for defining ancillary material quality across the development spectrum.

Ancillary materials (AMs) play a critical role in the manufacture of cell and gene therapies, and best practices for their quality management are the subject of ongoing discussion. Given that the final product cannot be sterilized, AM quality becomes increasingly critical to the clinical advancement of cell and gene therapies. Despite a lack of direct legislative direction regarding AM quality, internationally harmonized guidance is available from several industry-standard bodies that describe the principles and application of a risk-based approach to AM qualification and related supply-chain risk management. According to a best-practice risk-based approach, AMs must be adequately qualified to a degree that reflects the level of risk the material presents to patient safety and the drug product's specification. This general approach can be implemented in different ways, and balancing quality with cost of goods is critical to the cost-effective manufacture of advanced therapy medicinal products. In some cases, it may be preferable or necessary to use AMs that are produced in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice. However, developers may be able to suppress manufacturing costs without undermining safety or regulatory compliance in the case that a material presents a lower risk profile. Despite a great deal of attention and interest in the quality of AMs in the cell and gene therapy space, there is still a need for greater harmonization to create a shared understanding of what constitutes a risk-based approach to AM production and sourcing. In this article, we propose a staged approach to AM quality that achieves a balance between the competing demands of risk mitigation and cost of goods containment at the various stages of AM quality development. Our novel, heuristic framework for communication among AM suppliers, users and regulators aims to bring down development and manufacturing costs and lessen the workload around regulatory compliance.

Current perspectives on the use of ancillary materials for the manufacture of cellular therapies.

Continued growth in the cell therapy industry and commercialization of cell therapies that successfully advance through clinical trials has led to increased awareness around the need for specialized and complex materials utilized in their manufacture. Ancillary materials (AMs) are components or reagents used during the manufacture of cell therapy products but are not intended to be part of the final products. Commonly, there are limitations in the availability of clinical-grade reagents used as AMs. Furthermore, AMs may affect the efficacy of the cell product and subsequent safety of the cell therapy for the patient. As such, AMs must be carefully selected and appropriately qualified during the cell therapy development process. However, the ongoing evolution of cell therapy research, limited number of clinical trials and registered cell therapy products results in the current absence of specific regulations governing the composition, compliance, and qualification of AMs often leads to confusion by suppliers and users in this field. Here we provide an overview and interpretation of the existing global framework surrounding AM use and investigate some common misunderstandings within the industry, with the aim of facilitating the appropriate selection and qualification of AMs. The key message we wish to emphasize is that in order to most effectively mitigate risk around cell therapy development and patient safety, users must work with their suppliers and regulators to qualify each AM to assess source, purity, identity, safety, and suitability in a given application.

Culturing human pluripotent stem cells for regenerative medicine.

INTRODUCTION: The development of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) culture protocols has led to the establishment of directed differentiation induction methods, resulting in their application in regenerative medicine. Cell therapy products derived from hPSCs have been transplanted into patients, and promising results have been observed in some ongoing clinical trials. AREA COVERED: This review provides an overview of the challenges associated with the culture of hPSCs for clinical applications and the development of culture technologies designed to address these challenges. We also review future cell culture strategies for large-scale manufacturing to enhance patient access. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the great potential of hPSCs, difficulties such as safety, quality control, and cost management continue to pose obstacles to their product development and clinical translation. A substantial contribution of these issues lies in the cell culture process. Therefore, selecting the appropriate ancillary materials (AMs) and integrating effective culture methods in standard operating procedures (SOPs) from the early stages of clinical development are essential for success. Moreover, incorporating an automated scaling process is imperative to ensure the commercial feasibility of hPSC-based products. [Figure: see text]Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) show great potential as a valuable resource for regenerative medicine. However, three significant obstacles must be overcome: safety, quality, and costs. Thankfully, recent progress in hPSC culture techniques has effectively tackled these challenges, opening up exciting possibilities for realizing hPSC-based regenerative medicine.

Science-based assessment of source materials for cell-based medicines: report of a stakeholders workshop.

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have the potential to transform medicine. However, hurdles remain to ensure safety for such cellular products. Science-based understanding of the requirements for source materials is required as are appropriate materials. Leaders in hPSC biology, clinical translation, biomanufacturing and regulatory issues were brought together to define requirements for source materials for the production of hPSC-derived therapies and to identify other key issues for the safety of cell therapy products. While the focus of this meeting was on hPSC-derived cell therapies, many of the issues are generic to all cell-based medicines. The intent of this report is to summarize the key issues discussed and record the consensus reached on each of these by the expert delegates.