Presence of compensatory curve predicts postoperative curve progression in congenital scoliosis after thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection and short fusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of preoperative compensatory curve on the postoperative curve progression in congenital scoliosis (CS) patients following thoracolumbar hemivertebra (HV) resection and short fusion. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of patients with CS who underwent thoracolumbar HV resection and short fusion with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. According to the preoperative curve pattern, patients were divided into compensatory curve group non-compensatory curve group. Based on the postoperative coronal curve evolution, patients were further divided into the progressed group (Group P, with curve decompensation ≥ 20°) and the non-progressed group (Group NP, characterized by well-compensated curves). RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were included in this study, with 31 patients in the compensatory curve group and 96 patients in the non-compensatory curve group. The incidence of postoperative coronal curve progression was significantly higher in the compensatory curve group than that in non-compensatory curve group (35.5% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.007). In the compensatory curve group, patients who experienced postoperative curve progression showed fewer fusion segments (p = 0.001), greater preoperative UIV translation (p = 0.006), greater preoperative LIV tilt (p = 0.017), and larger postoperative UIV tilt (p < 0.001) compared with patients in group NP. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that the shorter fusion segments and greater postoperative UIV tilt were two independent risk factors for postoperative curve progression. CONCLUSION: The presence of the compensatory curve was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative curve progression in patients with CS who underwent thoracolumbar HV resection and short fusion. Shorter fusion segments and greater postoperative UIV tilt were found to be the risk factors for postoperative curve progression.

Risk Factors for Progression of Cervical Congenital Scoliosis and Associated Compensatory Curve Behavior.

Background: This study investigated risk factors for progression of deformity in pediatric congenital cervical scoliosis (CCS) and evaluated the correlation between congenital cervical curves and compensatory thoracic and lumbar curves. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 38 pediatric patients with CCS with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Curve progression was defined as >10° increase in cervical coronal curve angle between presentation and last follow-up. Results: A total of 38 patients (16 girls, 22 boys) with a mean age at presentation of 5.6 ± 4.1 years met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients (42%) had curve progression with a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 3.0 years. At presentation, T1 slope was significantly larger among children with progressive deformities (p = 0.041). A total of 18 of the 38 patients with strictly cervical spine deformity were then selected for subanalysis to evaluate the progression of compensatory curves. Cervical major coronal curves were found to significantly correlate with lumbar major coronal curves (r = 0.409), C2 central sacral vertical line (CSVL) (r = 0.407), and C7-CSVL (r = 0.403) (p < 0.05). Thoracic major coronal curves did not significantly correlate with cervical major coronal curves (r = 0.218) (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, 42% of osseous CCS curves progressed over time in the overall cohort, and high initial T1 slope was found to be most highly correlated with progression of cervical deformity. Cervical major coronal curves significantly correlated with lumbar curve magnitude but not with thoracic curve size in isolated CCS, possibly due to the increased flexibility of the lumbar spine which may allow greater compensatory balance and thus have a greater correlation with cervical curve magnitude and possibly progression.

Thoracolumbar curve behavior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and truncal balance in patients treated with selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) with Lenke 1A vs 1C curves at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate equivalent thoracic curve correction and reduced thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction compared to Lenke 1A curves. Additionally, at the most recent follow-up, both curve types demonstrate comparable coronal alignment at C7 and the lumbar curve apex, though 1C curves have better alignment at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Rates of revision surgery are equivalent between the two groups. METHODS: A matched cohort of 43 Risser 0-1, Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) 2-5 AIS pts with Lenke 1A (1A group)and 19 pts with Lenke 1C curves (1C group) treated with selective thoracic AVBT and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included. Digital radiographic software was used to assess Cobb angle and coronal alignment on preoperative, postoperative and subsequent follow-up radiographs. Coronal alignment was assessed by measuring the distance from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) to the midpoint of the LIV, apical vertebra for thoracic and lumbar curves and C7. RESULTS: There was no difference in the thoracic curve measured preoperatively, at first erect, pre-rupture or at the most recent follow-up, nor was there a significant difference in C7 alignment (p = 0.057) or apical thoracic alignment (p = 0.272) between the 1A and 1C groups. Thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were smaller in the 1A group at all-time points. However, there was no significant difference between the percent correction between the two groups thoracic (p = 0.453) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (p = 0.105). The Lenke 1C curves had improved coronal translational alignment of the LIV at the most recent follow-up p = 0.0355. At the most recent follow-up the number of patients considered to have successful curve correction (Cobb angle correction of both the thoracic and thoracolumbar//lumbar curves to ≤ 35 degrees), was equivalent between Lenke 1A and Lenke 1C curves (p = 0.80). There was also no difference in the rate of revision surgery between the two groups (p = 0.546). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the impact of lumbar curve modifier type on outcomes in thoracic AVBT. We found that Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate less absolute correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all time points but have equivalent percent correction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The two groups have equivalent alignment at C7 and the thoracic curve apex, and Lenke 1C curves have better alignment at the LIV at the most recent follow-up. Furthermore, they have an equivalent rate of revision surgery compared to Lenke 1A curves. Selective thoracic AVBT is a viable option for selective Lenke 1C curves, but despite equivalent correction of the thoracic curve, there is less correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all-time points.