Factors associated with the preparedness for bereavement in families of patients with cancer: A secondary analysis of a nationwide bereaved family survey.

OBJECTIVES: Insufficient preparedness for bereavement can affect a family's psychological health status after bereavement. However, factors associated with preparedness remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with preparedness for bereavement in families of patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan, analyzing data from 9123 family members of patients with cancer. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore how sociodemographic factors, health status, and perceived care for patients and families were associated with preparedness for bereavement. RESULTS: Of the 9123 families, 1338 (15.1%) were not prepared for bereavement. Factors associated with insufficient preparedness for bereavement (all p < 0.001) were found as follows: patients' spouses (OR = 2.54), receiving care in acute hospitals (OR = 1.83), worse psychological health status during caregiving (OR = 2.13), lower social support for family members (OR = 1.90), wrong patients' awareness of medical condition from family's perspective (OR = 1.75-2.12), family preference of more aggressive treatment rather than palliative care (OR = 1.71) or not sure (OR = 2.31), not wanting to know information about the patient's prognosis (OR = 1.64-1.77), end-of-life discussion with physician 1 month before patient's death (OR = 1.45), and late or early end-of-life discussions with physician and family (OR = 1.78-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results might assist clinicians in assessing and identifying families who are not prepared for bereavement; however, preparedness for bereavement may have been associated with other factors.

Factors associated with cancer patients' distinct death-preparedness states.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Facilitating death preparedness is important for improving cancer patients' quality of death and dying. We aimed to identify factors associated with the four death-preparedness states (no-preparedness, cognitive-only, emotional-only, and sufficient-preparedness) focusing on modifiable factors. METHODS: In this cohort study, we identified factors associated with 314 Taiwanese cancer patients' death-preparedness states from time-invariant socio-demographics and lagged time-varying modifiable variables, including disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on end-of-life (EOL) issues, and perceived social support using hierarchical generalized linear modeling. RESULTS: Patients who were male, older, without financial hardship to make ends meet, and suffered lower symptom distress were more likely to be in the emotional-only and sufficient-preparedness states than the no-death-preparedness-state. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.95 [0.91, 0.99] per year increase in age) and greater functional dependency (1.05 [1.00, 1.11]) were associated with being in the cognitive-only state. Physician prognostic disclosure increased the likelihood of being in the cognitive-only (51.51 [14.01, 189.36]) and sufficient-preparedness (47.42 [10.93, 205.79]) states, whereas higher patient-family communication on EOL issues reduced likelihood for the emotional-only state (0.38 [0.21, 0.69]). Higher perceived social support reduced the likelihood of cognitive-only (0.94 [0.91, 0.98]) but increased the chance of emotional-only (1.09 [1.05, 1.14]) state membership. CONCLUSIONS: Death-preparedness states are associated with patients' socio-demographics, disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on EOL issues, and perceived social support. Providing accurate prognostic disclosure, adequately managing symptom distress, supporting those with higher functional dependence, promoting empathetic patient-family communication on EOL issues, and enhancing perceived social support may facilitate death preparedness.

Associations of surrogates' death-preparedness states with decisional conflict and heightened decisional regret over cancer patients' last 6 months of life.

OBJECTIVE: Preparing family surrogates for patient death and end-of-life (EOL) decision making may reduce surrogate decisional conflict and regret. Preparedness for patient death involves cognitive and emotional preparedness. We assessed the associations of surrogates' death-preparedness states (that integrate both cognitive and emotional preparedness for patient death) with surrogates' decisional conflict and regret. METHODS: Associations of 173 surrogates' death-preparedness states (no, cognitive-only, emotional-only, and sufficient preparedness states) with decisional conflict (measured by the Decision Conflict Scale) and heightened decisional regret (Decision Regret Scale scores >25) were evaluated using hierarchical linear modeling and hierarchical generalized linear modeling, respectively, during a longitudinal observational study at a medical center over cancer patients' last 6 months. RESULTS: Surrogates reported high decisional conflict (mean [standard deviation] = 41.48 [6.05]), and 52.7% of assessments exceeded the threshold for heightened decisional regret. Surrogates in the cognitive-only preparedness state reported a significantly higher level of decisional conflict (ß = 3.010 [95% CI = 1.124, 4.896]) than those in the sufficient preparedness state. Surrogates in the no (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] [95% CI] = 0.293 [0.113, 0.733]) and emotional-only (AOR [95% CI] = 0.359 [0.149, 0.866]) preparedness states were less likely to suffer heightened decisional regret than those in the sufficient preparedness state. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogates' decisional conflict and heightened decisional regret are associated with their death-preparedness states. Improving emotional preparedness for the patient's death among surrogates in the cognitive-only preparedness state and meeting the specific needs of those in the no, emotional-only, and sufficient preparedness states are actionable high-quality EOL-care interventions that may lessen decisional conflict and decisional regret.

Associations of death-preparedness states with bereavement outcomes for family caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Death preparedness involves cognitive prognostic awareness and emotional acceptance of a relative's death. Effects of retrospectively assessed cognitive prognostic awareness and emotional preparedness for patient death have been individually investigated among bereaved family caregivers. We aimed to prospectively examine associations of caregivers' death-preparedness states, determined by conjoint cognitive prognostic awareness and emotional preparedness for death, with bereavement outcomes. METHODS: Associations of caregivers' death-preparedness states (no-death-preparedness, cognitive-death-preparedness-only, emotional-death-preparedness-only, and sufficient-death-preparedness states) at last preloss assessment with bereavement outcomes over the first two bereavement years were evaluated among 332 caregivers of advanced cancer patients using hierarchical linear models with the logit-transformed posterior probability for each death-preparedness state. RESULTS: Caregivers with a higher logit-transformed posterior probability for sufficient death-preparedness state reported less prolonged-grief symptoms, lower likelihoods of severe depressive symptoms and heightened decisional regret, and better mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Caregivers with a higher logit-transformed posterior probability for no-death-preparedness state reported less prolonged-grief symptoms, a lower likelihood of severe depressive symptoms, and better mental HRQOL. A higher logit-transformed posterior probability for cognitive-death-preparedness-only state was associated with bereaved caregivers' higher likelihood of heightened decisional regret, whereas that for emotional-death-preparedness-only state was not associated with caregivers' bereavement outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers' bereavement outcomes were associated with their preloss death-preparedness states, except for physical health-related QOL. Interventions focused on not only cultivating caregivers' accurate prognostic awareness but also adequately preparing them emotionally for their relative's forthcoming death are actionable opportunities for high-quality end-of-life care and are urgently warranted to facilitate caregivers' bereavement adjustment.

Caring ahead: Mixed methods development of a questionnaire to measure caregiver preparedness for end-of-life with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers of persons with dementia often feel unprepared for end-of-life and preparedness predicts caregiver outcomes in bereavement. Existing questionnaires assessing preparedness have limitations. A multi-dimensional questionnaire assessing family caregiver preparedness for the end-of-life of persons with dementia is needed to identify caregivers at risk for negative outcomes in bereavement and evaluate the quality of strategies within a palliative approach. AIM: To develop a multi-dimensional questionnaire titled 'Caring Ahead' to assess feelings of preparedness for end-of-life in family caregivers of persons with dementia. DESIGN: A mixed methods, sequential design employed semi-structured interviews, a Delphi-survey and pilot-testing of the questionnaire, June 2018 to July 2019. SETTING/POPULATION: Participants included five current and 16 bereaved family caregivers of persons with symptoms advanced dementia from long-term care homes in Ontario, Canada; and 12 professional experts from clinical and academic settings in Canada, Europe, United States. RESULTS: Interviews generated three core concepts and 114 indicators of preparedness sampling cognitive, affective and behavioural traits in four domains (i.e., medical, psychosocial, spiritual, practical). Indicators were translated and reduced to a pool of 73 potential questionnaire items. 30-items were selected to create the 'Caring Ahead' preparedness questionnaire through a Delphi-survey. Items were revised through a pilot-test with cognitive interviewing. CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers' feelings of preparedness for end-of-life need to be assessed and the quality of strategies within a palliative approach evaluated. Future psychometric testing of the Caring Ahead questionnaire will evaluate evidence for validity and reliability.

Is preparation for end of life associated with pre-death grief in caregivers of people with dementia?

OBJECTIVES: Family caregivers of people with dementia can experience loss and grief before death. We hypothesized that modifiable factors indicating preparation for end of life are associated with lower pre-death grief in caregivers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Caregivers of people with dementia living at home or in a care home. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 150 caregivers, 77% female, mean age 63.0 (SD = 12.1). Participants cared for people with mild (25%), moderate (43%), or severe dementia (32%). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory Short Form (MMCGI-SF). We included five factors reflecting preparation for end of life: (1) knowledge of dementia, (2) social support, (3) feeling supported by healthcare providers, (4) formalized end of life documents, and (5) end-of-life discussions with the person with dementia. We used multiple regression to assess associations between pre-death grief and preparation for end of life while controlling for confounders. We repeated this analysis with MMCGI-SF subscales ("personal sacrifice burden"; "heartfelt sadness"; "worry and felt isolation"). RESULTS: Only one hypothesized factor (reduced social support) was strongly associated with higher grief intensity along with the confounders of female gender, spouse, or adult child relationship type and reduced relationship closeness. In exploratory analyses of MMCGI-SF subscales, one additional hypothesized factor was statistically significant; higher dementia knowledge was associated with lower "heartfelt sadness." CONCLUSION: We found limited support for our hypothesis. Future research may benefit from exploring strategies for enhancing caregivers' social support and networks as well as the effectiveness of educational interventions about the progression of dementia (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03332979).

Caregiver preparedness for death in dementia: an evaluation of existing tools.

Objectives: Death preparedness amongst family caregivers (CG) is a valuable and measurable concept. Preparedness predicts CG outcomes in bereavement and is modifiable through a palliative approach which includes advance care planning (ACP) interventions. Improving death preparedness is important for CGs of persons with dementia (PwD) whom are more likely to develop negative outcomes in bereavement, and experience less than adequate palliative care. However, the adequacy of existing tools to measure death preparedness in CGs of PwD is unknown, which limits intervention design and prospective evaluation of ACP effectiveness.Methods: We conducted a review and evaluation of existing tools measuring the attribute domains and traits of CG death preparedness. Literature was searched for articles describing caregiving at end of life (EOL). Measurement tools were extracted, screened for inclusion criteria, and data extracted regarding: conceptual basis, population of development, and psychometrics. Tool content was compared to preparedness domains/traits to assess congruency and evaluate the adequacy of tools as measures of death preparedness for CGs of PwD.Results: Authors extracted 569 tools from articles, retaining seven tools for evaluation. The majority of tools, n = 5 (70%) did not sample all preparedness domains/traits. Few tools had items specific to EOL; only one tool had a specific item questioning CG preparedness for death, and only one tool had items specific to dementia.Conclusion: Limitations in existing tools suggest they are not adequate measures of death preparedness for CGs of PwD. Consequently, the authors are currently developing a questionnaire to be titled, 'Caring Ahead' for this purpose.

Death Attitudes as Possible Predictors of Death Preparedness across Lifespan among Nonclinical Populations in Nairobi County, Kenya.

CONTEXT: Death is an important part of lifespan development, yet it remains trivialized or feared across many cultures. The perpetuation of death as a taboo subject continues to negatively affect the society. Death anxiety inhibits death preparedness which could affect the quality of dying. The pool of unclaimed assets held by different organizations continues to increase, intestate deaths remain high, and post death conflicts continue to affect many families. AIMS: This study intended to examine death attitudes as possible predictors of death preparedness and explore the rationale for various death attitudes across lifespan in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: The study adopted the mixed-methods explanatory sequential research design combining cross-sectional and phenomenological designs. The study targeted young adults, middle-aged adults, and seniors with a sample of 335 participants selected using multistage, stratified, and extreme case sampling designs. Data were collected using the Death Attitude Profile-Revised and interview guides. ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using univariate and thematic analyses. RESULTS: The findings indicated that negative death attitudes declined with increase in age, whereas positive death attitudes increased with increase in age. Some of the reasons for negative death attitudes included threatening dying process, unfulfilled life goals, fear of hell, unresolved past deaths, and families with young children among others. The reasons for positive death attitude included reuniting with deceased loved ones and peers, meeting the creator, and end to a prolonged miserable life and fulfilled past life. CONCLUSION: This study implies that mental health practitioners need to target younger adults with death education programs to promote death preparedness and quality dying. For the older adults, addressing life regrets, family conflicts, and past unresolved deaths would significantly improve the quality of dying.

Caregivers' Death-Preparedness States Impact Caregiving Outcomes and Patients' End-of-Life Care.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Preparing family caregivers, cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally, for their relative's death is an actionable component of high-quality end-of-life care. We aimed to examine the never-before-examined associations of conjoint cognitive prognostic awareness and emotional preparedness for death with caregiving outcomes and end-of-life care received by cancer patients. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/MAIN MEASURES: For this longitudinal study, associations of death-preparedness states (no-death-preparedness, cognitive-death-preparedness-only, emotional-death-preparedness-only, and sufficient-death-preparedness states) with subjective caregiving burden, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) and patients' end-of-life care (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care unit care, intubation, mechanical ventilation support, vasopressors, nasogastric tube feeding, and hospice care) were evaluated using multivariate hierarchical linear and logistic regression modeling, respectively, for 377 caregivers in cancer patients' last 6 months and 1 month, respectively. KEY RESULTS: Caregivers in the cognitive-death-preparedness-only state experienced a higher level of subjective caregiving burden than those in the sufficient-death-preparedness state. Caregivers in the no-death-preparedness and cognitive-death-preparedness-only states reported significantly more depressive symptoms and worse QOL than those in the sufficient-death-preparedness state. Cancer patients with caregivers in the sufficient-death-preparedness state were less likely to receive chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, intubation, mechanical ventilation, and nasogastric tube feeding than patients with caregivers in other death-preparedness states. However, patients' receipt of hospice care was not associated with their caregivers' death-preparedness states. CONCLUSION: Family caregivers' death-preparedness states were associated with caregiving outcomes and their relative's end-of-life care. Cultivating caregivers' accurate prognostic awareness and improving their emotional preparedness for their relative's death may facilitate more favorable end-of-life-caregiving outcomes and may limit potentially nonbeneficial end-of-life care.

Sufficient Death Preparedness Correlates to Better Mental Health, Quality of Life, and EOL Care.

CONTEXT: Patients can prepare for end of life and their forthcoming death to enhance the quality of dying. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to longitudinally evaluate the never-before-examined associations of cancer patients' death-preparedness states by conjoint cognitive prognostic awareness and emotional preparedness for death with psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and end-of-life care received. METHODS: In this cohort study, we simultaneously evaluated associations of four previously identified death-preparedness states (no-death-preparedness, cognitive-death-preparedness-only, emotional-death-preparedness-only, and sufficient-death-preparedness states) with anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and QOL over 383 cancer patients' last six months and end-of-life care received in the last month using multivariate hierarchical linear modeling and logistic regression modeling, respectively. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) have been established for anxiety- (1.3-1.8) and depressive- (1.5-1.7) symptom subscales (0-21 Likert scales). RESULTS: Patients in the no-death-preparedness and cognitive-death-preparedness-only states reported increases in anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms that exceed the MCIDs, and a decline in QOL from those in the sufficient-death-preparedness state. Patients in the emotional-death-preparedness-only state were more (OR [95% CI]=2.38 [1.14, 4.97]) and less (OR [95% CI]=0.38 [0.15, 0.94]) likely to receive chemotherapy/immunotherapy and hospice care, respectively, than those in the sufficient-death-preparedness state. Death-preparedness states were not associated with life-sustaining treatments received in the last month. CONCLUSION: Conjoint cognitive and emotional preparedness for death is associated with cancer patients' lower psychological distress, better QOL, reduced anti-cancer therapy, and increased hospice-care utilization. Facilitating accurate prognostic awareness and emotional preparedness for death is justified when consistent with patient circumstances and preferences.

Practical and emotional preparation for death: A mixed methods study investigating experiences of family carers of people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: When family carers are more prepared for the end of the life of a person they care for, they report improved bereavement outcomes. Few studies have explored how carers prepare for the death of a person with dementia. We aimed to explore how carers for people with all stages of dementia experience preparing for end of life care and death. METHODS: This was a mixed methods cross-sectional study. Family carers of people with dementia (n = 150) completed a structured interview with validated scales, alongside questions about death preparedness and advance decisions. A sub-sample (n = 16) completed qualitative interviews exploring their experiences of planning for end of life. We fitted logistic regression models to explore associations with preparedness, and thematically analysed qualitative data. RESULTS: We addressed practical and emotional preparation separately for 143 participants. Fifty seven percent of participants were very practically prepared for death, while only 29% were very emotionally prepared. Male carers were more likely than female carers to report being very emotionally and practically prepared. Higher engagement with healthcare professionals was associated with feeling very practically prepared; although we found that formal discussions of end of life care issues with healthcare professionals did not impact carers' feelings of preparation. Higher levels of dementia severity and carer depression were associated with feeling very emotionally prepared. Three qualitative themes related to practical and emotional preparation were identified: (1) ambiguity and uncertainty; (2) support from the system; and (3) how death is perceived by the carer. CONCLUSIONS: While most carers felt practically prepared for death, emotional preparation was much lower. Further research is needed to understand how engagement with healthcare professionals or other forms of social or emotional support could help carers, particularly female carers, to emotionally prepare for their relative's death.

Course of Changes in Emotional Preparedness for Death and Its Associations With Caregiving Outcomes for Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Over Their Last Year of Life.

BACKGROUND: Preparing family caregivers for a patient's death is an integral component of quality end-of-life care, but temporal changes in emotional preparedness for death and its associations with caregivers' psychological well-being or quality of life (QOL) while providing end-of-life caregiving are under-researched. Our study was conducted to fill this gap. METHODS: For this prospective, longitudinal study, the course of changes in adequate emotional preparedness for death and its associations with severe depressive symptoms and QOL were examined on 309 consecutive caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients by univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Prevalence of adequate emotional preparedness for death was 57.2%, 61.3%, 54.4%, and 46.0% at 181-365, 91-180, 31-90, and 1-30 days before the patient's death, respectively, without significant changes as the patient's death approached. Adequate emotional preparedness for death was associated with caregivers' lower likelihood of severe depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.23 [0.16, 0.32], P < 0.001) but with their better QOL (adjusted ß [95% CI]: 7.65 [6.38, 8.92], P < 0.001) in the patient's last year. CONCLUSIONS: Without active, effective clinical interventions to promote caregivers' emotional preparedness for death, they cannot automatically become more prepared for the patient's death over time. Adequate emotional preparedness for the patient's death benefits caregivers by its associations with a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms and better QOL. Supportive programs for caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients should focus on not only enhancing caregiving skills but also cultivating emotional preparedness for their relative's death to promote their psychological well-being and QOL.

Distinct Death-Preparedness States by Combining Cognitive and Emotional Preparedness for Death and Their Evolution for Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Over Their Last 6 Months of Life.

CONTEXT: To identify caregivers' death-preparedness states by combining cognitive and emotional preparedness for their loved one's death as well as their evolution over cancer patients' last 6 months, which have never been explored. METHODS: Death-preparedness states and their evolution were examined by hidden Markov modeling among 393 caregivers of cancer patients. RESULTS: Four death-preparedness states were identified: no death preparedness, cognitive death preparedness only, emotional death preparedness only, and sufficient death preparedness. Caregivers in the no-death-preparedness state had neither accurate cognitive prognostic awareness (PA) nor adequate emotional preparedness for death. Caregivers in the sufficient-death-preparedness state reported accurate PA and adequate emotional preparedness for death. In the cognitive- and emotional-death-preparedness-only states, caregivers were accurately aware of the patient's prognosis and adequately emotionally prepared for his/her forthcoming death only, respectively. Prevalence of the sufficient-death-preparedness state fluctuated within a narrow range (40.8%-43.2%) over the patient's last six months. Proportions of caregivers decreased in the emotional-death-preparedness-only (19.5%-6.5%) and no-death-preparedness (21.0%-8.2%) states, whereas prevalence of the cognitive-death-preparedness-only state increased substantially (16.3%-44.4%) to become the most prevalent state as death approached. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of cancer patients heterogeneously experienced combined cognitive and emotional preparedness for death. About 40% of caregivers consistently had sufficient death preparedness over their loved one's dying process. Evaluating these different aspects of death preparedness could be an important approach in high-quality end-of-life care by not only cultivating caregivers' cognitive PA, but also facilitating their emotional preparedness for the patient's death, thus helping caregivers prepare well for their loved one's forthcoming death.

"A Crazy Roller Coaster at the End": A Qualitative Study of Death Preparedness With Caregivers of Persons With Dementia.

INTRODUCTION: Caregivers of persons with dementia experience challenges that can make preparing for end-of-life particularly difficult. Feeling prepared for death is associated with caregiver well-being in bereavement and is promoted by strategies supporting a palliative approach. Further conceptualization of caregiver preparedness for death of persons with dementia is needed to guide the practice of healthcare providers and to inform development of a preparedness questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to: 1) explore the end-of-life experiences of caregivers of persons with dementia to understand factors perceived as influencing preparedness; and 2) identify the core concepts (i.e., components), barriers and facilitators of preparedness for death. METHODS: This study used an interpretive descriptive design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen bereaved caregivers of persons with dementia, recruited from long-term care homes in Ontario. Data was analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four themes were interpreted including: 'A crazy rollercoaster at the end' which described the journey of caregivers at end-of-life. The journey provided context for the development of core concepts (i.e., components) of preparedness represented by three themes: 'A sense of control, 'Doing right' and 'Coming to terms'. CONCLUSION: The study findings serve to expand the conceptualization of preparedness and can guide improvements to practice in long-term care. Core concepts, facilitators and influential factors of preparedness will provide the conceptual basis and content to develop the Caring Ahead: Preparing for End-of-Life with Dementia questionnaire.

Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Emotional Preparedness for Death Is Distinct From Their Accurate Prognostic Awareness.

CONTEXT: Emotional preparedness for death (hereafter called death preparedness) and prognostic awareness (PA), a distinct but related concept, each contributes to patients' practical, psychological, and interpersonal preparations for death. However, the distinction between these two concepts has never been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the distinction between death preparedness and accurate PA by examining their agreement during cancer patients' last year and the similarity of their predictors. METHODS: For this secondary analysis of a longitudinal study of death preparedness for 277 patients with cancer, agreement between death preparedness and accurate PA was evaluated by percentages and kappa coefficients, and predictors of the two outcomes were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression models with the generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: Levels of agreement between reported death preparedness and accurate PA increased slightly (42.44%-52.85%) from 181-365 days to one to 30 days before death, with kappa values from -0.190 (-0.319, -0.061) to -0.006 (-0.106, 0.093), indicating poor agreement. Participants who were male, older, reported financial sufficiency, had fewer distressing symptoms, and perceived higher levels of social support were more likely to report death preparedness. Participants who were female, had greater than high-school educational attainment, and endured higher levels of functional dependence were more likely to report accurate PA. CONCLUSION: The distinction between death preparedness and accurate PA was supported by their poor agreement, lack of reciprocal associations, and two different sets of predictors. Health care professionals should not only cultivate cancer patients' accurate PA but also facilitate emotional preparation for death to achieve a good death and improve end-of-life care quality.

What Does Death Preparedness Mean for Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia?

PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study was to clarify the concept of death preparedness for family caregivers in dementia. Conceptualization was required to support the assessment, promotion, and operationalization (ie, measurement) of death preparedness through palliative care interventions such as advance care planning. METHODS:: Rodgers evolutionary method of concept analysis was selected to guide this study because of the dynamic nature of death preparedness influenced by context, setting, and time. A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Authors performed constant comparative analysis to identify and interpret surrogate/related concepts, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of death preparedness. RESULTS:: Most importantly attributes included (1) knowing and recognizing the symptoms of decline in dementia and what dying looks like; (2) understanding emotions and grief responses; (3) accessing and appraising supports needed to manage and care for dying; (4) organizing affairs and completing tasks in advance; (5) accepting that losses are inevitable and imminent; (6) reflecting on caregiving and finding meaning, "a silver-lining"; and (7) closing, reconciling, and renewing relationship bonds and completing the family member's life. DISCUSSION:: This study contributed a full definition of death preparedness in dementia. Findings aligned with/expanded upon Hebert et al Theoretical Framework of Preparedness for End-of-Life. The use of problem- and emotion-based coping strategies by caregivers with support from health-care providers to promote feelings of death preparedness (including self-efficacy and control) and minimize uncertainty was the implication of this study. Development of a holistic preparedness instrument is underway.

Courses of Change in Good Emotional Preparedness for Death and Accurate Prognostic Awareness and Their Associations With Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Year of Life.

CONTEXT: Emotional preparedness for death is a distinct but related concept to prognostic awareness (PA). Both allow patients to prepare psychologically and interpersonally for death, but they have primarily been examined in cross-sectional studies. OBJECTIVES: To 1) explore the courses of change in good emotional preparedness for death and accurate PA and 2) evaluate their associations with severe anxiety symptoms, severe depressive symptoms, and quality of life in cancer patients' last year. METHODS: For this prospective, longitudinal study, we consecutively recruited 277 terminally ill cancer patients. Aims 1 and 2 were examined by univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of good emotional preparedness for death was 54.43%-65.85% in the last year, with a significant decrease only 91-180 vs. 181-365 days before death (odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.47, 0.97]). Good emotional preparedness for death was associated with a lower likelihood of severe anxiety symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.27, 0.79]) and severe depressive symptoms (0.61 [0.39, 0.95]), but not with quality of life (ß [95% CI] = 0.49 [-2.13, 3.11]). However, accurate PA improved substantially (55.12%-70.73%) as death approached and accurate PA was positively associated with severe depressive symptoms (2.63 [1.63, 4.25]). CONCLUSION: Good emotional preparedness for death and accurate PA remained largely stable and improved substantially, respectively, in cancer patients' last year. Both measures were significantly associated with psychological distress. Health care professionals should not only cultivate accurate PA but also promote cancer patients' emotional preparedness for death, which may improve their psychological well-being.