Influence of ceramic thickness and dental substrate on the survival rate and failure load of non-retentive occlusal veneers after fatigue.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of ceramic thickness and dental substrate (enamel vs. dentin/enamel) on the survival rate and failure load of non-retentive occlusal veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human maxillary molars (n = 60) were divided into five test-groups (n = 12). The groups (named DE-1.5, DE-1.0, DE-0.5, E-1.0, E-0.5) differed in their dental substrate (E = enamel, DE = dentin/enamel) and restoration thickness (standard: 1.5 mm, thin: 1.0 mm, ultrathin: 0.5 mm). All teeth were prepared for non-retentive monolithic lithium-disilicate occlusal veneers (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar). Restorations were adhesively cemented (Syntac Classic/Variolink II, Ivoclar) and exposed to thermomechanical fatigue (1.2 million cycles, 1.6 Hz, 49 N/ 5-55°C). Single load to failure was performed using a universal testing-machine. A linear-regression model was applied, pairwise comparisons used the Student-Newman-Keuls method (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Three dentin-based occlusal veneers (one DE-1.0, two DE-0.5) revealed cracks after fatigue exposure, which corresponds to an overall-survival rate of 95%. Load to failure resulted in the following ranking: 2142 N(DE-0.5) > 2105 N(E-1.0) > 2075 N(E-0.5) > 1440 N(DE-1.5) > 1430 N(DE-1.0). Thin (E-1.0) and ultrathin enamel-based occlusal veneers (E-0.5) revealed high failure loads and surpassed the standard thickness dentin-based veneers (DE-1.5) significantly (p = 0.044, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: All tested monolithic lithium disilicate occlusal veneers obtained failure loads above physiological chewing forces. Thin and ultrathin enamel-based occlusal veneers outperformed the standard thick dentin-based occlusal veneers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Minimally invasive enamel-based occlusal veneer restorations with non-retentive preparation design may serve as a conservative treatment option.

Posterior minimally invasive full-veneers: Effect of ceramic thicknesses, bonding substrate, and preparation designs on failure-load and -mode after fatigue.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of ceramic thicknesses, bonding surface (enamel vs. dentin), and preparation design (box vs. no box) on the fatigue survival and failure load of minimally invasive full-veneer restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human-premolars (n = 60) were divided into five test groups (n = 12). All teeth received full-veneer preparation with the following occlusal/labial thicknesses: standard: 1.5/0.8 mm; thin: 1.0/0.6 mm; ultrathin 0.5/0.4 mm. Preparations for each ceramic thickness were refined in enamel (E-1.0 and E-0.5) or dentin (D-1.5, D-1.0, and D-0.5). Control groups DB-1.5, EB-1.0, and EB-0.5 received box preparations. Monolithic lithium disilicate restorations (IPS-e.max-Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were adhesively cemented (Syntac-Classic/Variolink-II, Ivoclar Vivadent) and subjected to cyclic mechanical loading (F = 49 N, 1.2 million cycles) with simultaneous thermocycling (5-55°C). All specimens were exposed to single load-to-failure. Pair-wise differences were calculated by using a linear regression model and Student-Newman-Keuls method (p < 0.05). RESULTS: All full-veneers of group D-1.5, E-1.0, E-0.5, DB-1.5, EB-1.0, and EB-0.5 survived fatigue. Two full-veneers (D-1.0 and D-0.5) revealed cracks during fatigue, resulting in an overall fatigue survival rate of 98.1%. Mean load-to-failure values (N) were as followed: 1005 (D-1.5); 866 (D-1.0); 816 (D-0.5); 1495 (E-1.0); 1279 (E-0.5); 1129 (DB-1.5); 1087 (EB-1.0); and 833 (EB-0.5). Irrespective of ceramic thicknesses, enamel-based full-veneers resulted in higher failure loads than dentin-based restorations. Box preparation reduced the failure loads of thin and ultrathin enamel-based restorations. CONCLUSION: All tested monolithic lithium disilicate full-veneer restorations exceeded physiological masticatory forces. Minimally invasive full-veneer restorations with enamel as a bonding surface and a non-retentive preparation design showed superior performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Enamel-based non-retentive full-veneers made of monolithic lithium disilicate may serve as a reliable and esthetical minimally invasive treatment option for premolars.

Influence of bonding surface and bonding methods on the fracture resistance and survival rate of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic after cyclic loading.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of bonding method and type of dental bonding surface on fracture resistance and survival rate of resin bonded occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic after cyclic loading. METHODS: Fourty-eight extracted molars were divided into three groups (N=16) depending on the preparation: within enamel, within dentin/enamel or within enamel/composite resin filling. Lithium disilicate occlussal veneers were fabricated with a fissure-cusp thickness of 0.3-0.6mm. Restorations were etched (5% HF), silanated and adhesively luted using a dual-curing luting composite resin. Test groups were divided into two subgroups, one using a only a self-etching primer, the other additionally etching the enamel with phosphoric acid. After water storage (37°C; 21d) and thermocycling (7500 cycles; 5-55°C), specimens were subjected to dynamic loading in a chewing simulator (600,000 cycles; 10kg/2Hz). Surviving specimens were loaded until fracture using a universal testing machine. RESULTS: All specimens survived artificial aging, several specimens showed some damage. ANOVA revealed that enamel etching provided statistically significantly (p≤0.05) higher fracture resistance than self-etching when bonding to enamel and dentin. Self-etching provided statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher fracture resistance for the enamel-composite group than for the enamel group. Enamel etching provided statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher fracture resistance for the enamel and dentin group than for groups enamel and enamel-composite. SIGNIFICANCE: Etching enamel improved the fracture resistance of occlusal veneers when bonding to dentin and enamel and increased the survival rate when bonding to enamel.

Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic thickness and type of dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of non-retentive full-coverage adhesively retained occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. METHODS: Seventy-two extracted molars were divided into three test groups (N=24) depending on the location of the occlusal veneer preparation: solely within enamel, within enamel and dentin or within enamel and an occlusal composite resin filling. For each test group, occlusal all-ceramic restorations were fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (IPS e.max CAD) in three subgroups with different thicknesses ranging from 0.3 to 0.7mm in the fissures and from 0.6 to 1.0mm at the cusps. The veneers were etched (5% HF), silanated and adhesively luted using a self etching primer and a composite luting resin (Multilink Primer A/B and Multilink Automix). After water storage at 37°C for 3 days and thermal cycling for 7500 cycles at 5-55°C, specimens were subjected to dynamic loading in a chewing simulator with 600,000 loading cycles at 10kg combined with thermal cycling. Unfractured specimens were loaded until fracture using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing. RESULTS: Only specimens in the group with the thickest dimension (0.7mm in fissure, 1.0mm at cusp) survived cyclic loading without any damage. Survival rates in the remaining subgroups ranged from 50 to 100% for surviving with some damage and from 12.5 to 75% for surviving without any damage. Medians of final fracture resistance ranged from 610 to 3390N. In groups with smaller ceramic thickness, luting to dentin or composite provided statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher fracture resistance than luting to enamel only. The thickness of the occlual ceramic veneers had a statistically significant (p≤0.05) influence on fracture resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest to use a thickness of 0.7-1mm for non-retentive full-coverage adhesively retained occlusal lithium disilicate ceramic restorations.