Treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by the microbiome: a large observational study in UK DMARD-naïve patients.

OBJECTIVES: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are first line treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment response to DMARDs is patient-specific, dose efficacy is difficult to predict and long-term results variable. The gut microbiota are known to play a pivotal role in prodromal and early-disease RA, manifested by Prevotella spp. enrichment. The clinical response to therapy may be mediated by microbiota, and large-scale studies assessing the microbiome are few. This study assessed whether microbiome signals were associated with, and predictive of, patient response to DMARD-treatment. Accurate early identification of those who will respond poorly to DMARD therapy would allow selection of alternative treatment (e.g. biologic therapy), and potentially improve patient outcome. METHODS: A multicentre, longitudinal, observational study of stool- and saliva microbiome was performed in DMARD-naïve, newly diagnosed RA patients during introduction of DMARD treatment. Clinical data and samples were collected at baseline (n = 144) in DMARD-naïve patients and at six weeks (n = 117) and 12 weeks (n = 95) into DMARD-therapy. Samples collected (n = 365 stool, n = 365 saliva) underwent shotgun sequencing. Disease activity measures were collected at each timepoint and minimal clinically important improvement determined. RESULTS: In total, 26 stool microbes were found to decrease in those manifesting a minimal clinically important improvement. Prevotella spp. and Streptococcus spp. were the predominant taxa to decline following six weeks and 12 weeks of DMARDs, respectively. Furthermore, baseline microbiota of DMARD-naïve patients were indicative of future response. CONCLUSION: DMARDs appear to restore a perturbed microbiome to a eubiotic state. Moreover, microbiome status can be used to predict likelihood of patient response to DMARD.

Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the relative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, vs other biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) for PsA using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic literature review (most recent update conducted on 1 January 2023) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of b/tsDMARDs in PsA. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for efficacy outcomes at Weeks 12-24 for b/tsDMARD-naïve and TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced patients. Safety at Weeks 12-24 was analysed in a mixed population. Odds ratios (ORs) and differences of mean change with the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated for the best-fitting models, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to determine relative rank. RESULTS: The NMA included 41 RCTs for 22 b/tsDMARDs. For minimal disease activity (MDA), bimekizumab ranked 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients. In b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, bimekizumab ranked 6th, 5th and 3rd for ACR response ACR20/50/70, respectively. In TNFi-experienced patients, bimekizumab ranked 1st, 2nd and 1st for ACR20/50/70, respectively. For Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, bimekizumab ranked 2nd and 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, respectively, and 1st and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients, respectively. Bimekizumab was comparable to b/tsDMARDs for serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Bimekizumab ranked favourably among b/tsDMARDs for efficacy on joint, skin and MDA outcomes, and showed comparable safety, suggesting it may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with PsA.

Rheumatoid arthritis and risk of osteoarticular infection and death following Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: A nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarticular infection (OAI) is a feared complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to explore risk of OAI and death following SAB in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify risk factors for OAI in patients with RA. METHODS: Danish nationwide cohort study of all patients with microbiologically verified first-time SAB between 2006-2018. We identified RA, SAB, comorbidities, and RA-related characteristics (e.g. orthopaedic implants, antirheumatic treatment) in national registries including the rheumatology registry DANBIO. We estimated cumulative incidence of OAI and death and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs, multivariate Cox regression). RESULTS: We identified 18 274 patients with SAB (n = 367 with RA). The 90-day cumulative incidence of OAI was 23.1%(95%CI 18.8; 27.6) for patients with RA and 12.5%(12.1; 13.0) for patients without RA (non-RA) (HR 1.93(1.54; 2.41)). For RA patients with orthopaedic implants cumulative incidence was 29.4%(22.9; 36.2) (HR 1.75(1.08; 2.85), and for current users of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) it was 41.9%(27.0; 56.1) (HR 2.27(1.29; 3.98) compared with non-users). All-cause 90-day mortality following SAB was similar in RA (35.4%(30.6; 40.3)) and non-RA (33.9%(33.2; 34.5), HR 1.04(0.87; 1.24)). CONCLUSION: Following SAB, almost one in four patients with RA contracted OAI corresponding to a doubled risk compared with non-RA. In RA, orthopaedic implants and current TNFi use were associated with approximately doubled OAI risk. One in three died within 90 days in both RA and non-RA. These findings encourage vigilance in RA patients with SAB to avoid treatment delay of OAI.

Association of the multi-biomarker disease activity score with arterial 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and atherosclerosis share many common inflammatory pathways. We studied whether a multi-biomarker panel for RA disease activity (MBDA) would associate with changes in arterial inflammation in an interventional trial. METHODS: In the TARGET Trial, RA patients with active disease despite methotrexate were randomly assigned to the addition of either a TNF inhibitor or sulfasalazine+hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy). Baseline and 24-week follow-up 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans were assessed for change in arterial inflammation measured as the maximal arterial target-to-blood background ratio of FDG uptake in the most diseased segment of the carotid arteries or aorta (MDS-TBRmax). The MBDA test, measured at baseline and weeks 6, 18, and 24, was assessed for its association with the change in MDS-TBRmax. RESULTS: Interpretable scans were available at baseline and week 24 for n = 112 patients. The MBDA score at week 24 was significantly correlated with the change in MDR-TBRmax (Spearman's rho = 0.239; p= 0.011) and remained significantly associated after adjustment for relevant confounders. Those with low MBDA at week 24 had a statistically significant adjusted reduction in arterial inflammation of 0.35 units vs no significant reduction in those who did not achieve low MBDA. Neither DAS28-CRP nor CRP predicted change in arterial inflammation. The MBDA component with the strongest association with change in arterial inflammation was serum amyloid A (SAA). CONCLUSIONS: Among treated RA patients, achieved MBDA predicts of changes in arterial inflammation. Achieving low MBDA at 24 weeks was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in arterial inflammation, regardless of treatment.

Sex-Related Differences in Dispensation of Rheumatic Medications in Older Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare dispensation of rheumatic medications between older male and female patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada (years 2010-2017), on patients with incident RA and PsA, who were aged ≥ 66 years at the time of diagnosis. Yearly dispensation of rheumatic drugs was compared between older male and female patients for 3 years after diagnosis using multivariable regression models, after adjusting for confounders. The groups of drugs included in the analysis were disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) classified as conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and advanced therapy (biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and oral corticosteroids. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: We analyzed 13,613 patients (64% female) with RA and 1116 patients (57% female) with PsA. Female patients with RA were more likely to receive opioids (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.58 to OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.32-1.72) and NSAIDs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25 to OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30). Dispensation of DMARDs showed no sex difference in either group. Subgroup analyses showed more intense use of advanced therapy in the RA cohort and of csDMARDs in the PsA cohort when patient and physician sex was concordant. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify any sex difference in the use of DMARDs among older patients with RA and PsA. The reasons for the higher use of opioids and NSAIDs among female patients with RA warrant further research.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Pharmacological Interventions in Adult-Onset Still Disease and the Role of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological treatments for adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). METHODS: Six databases, 2 trial registries, and conference abstracts were searched from January 2012 to February 2023 for studies of pharmacological interventions in people with AOSD. Outcomes were rates of remission and response, discontinuation of concurrent treatments, complications of AOSD, and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for case series. RESULTS: Forty-four studies evaluated treatments, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). For bDMARDs, tocilizumab (TCZ), anakinra (ANK), and canakinumab (CNK) had the most available data. Although 3 randomized controlled trials did not show statistically significant benefits of bDMARDs, metaanalyses showed high rates of complete remission and CS discontinuation. Complete remission was 80% (95% CI 59-92%, I 2 36%), 73% (95% CI 58-84%, I 2 66%), and 77% (95% CI 29-97%, I 2 82%) and CS discontinuation was 57% (95% CI 29-81%, I 2 66%), 47% (95% CI 18-78%, I 2 79%), and 34% (95% CI 6-81%, I 2 59%), respectively, for TCZ, ANK, and CNK. Studies with a higher proportion of patients previously treated with bDMARDs showed a trend toward lower rates of CS discontinuation (P = 0.05). The analyses had high clinical heterogeneity, largely because treatments were prescribed as different lines of therapy. CONCLUSION: Evidence supports TCZ, ANK, and CNK therapy for AOSD. However, the magnitude of effect and comparative effectiveness of treatments is uncertain.

Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis-Related Enthesitis and Persistence on Tofacitinib Under Real-World Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Information on the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is scarce in real-world conditions. Our objective was to analyze the persistence and safety of TOF under these conditions. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study of all patients with PsA who received at least 1 dose of TOF. The main focus was on adverse events (AEs) and drug survival. Drug survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and persistence explanatory factors by multivariate Cox regression models. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to measure association. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included, 54 women and 18 men, mean age 51.9 (SD 11.1) years, mean disease duration of 10.4 (SD 6.99) years. TOF was ≥ third line of therapy in > 70% of cases. The median survival was 13.0 (IQR 5.3-29.0) months. One-year retention rate was 52.7% (95% CI 42.4-65.6). TOF survival was not influenced by sex, disease duration, comorbidities, or line of treatment. Younger patients (HR 0.96, P = 0.01) and those with enthesitis (HR 0.37, P = 0.03) showed lower odds of drug discontinuation. The overall rate of AEs was 52.9 (95% CI 38.5-70.6)/100 person-years. Most AEs occurred during the first 6 months of exposure. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, TOF showed a reasonably good retention rate in a PsA population that was mostly refractory to biologic and oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. There were no new causes for concern regarding safety. Patients with refractory PsA and enthesitis might be a specific target population for this drug.

When should the use of biological agents be considered in persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients?

The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups with and without bDMARDs added to the treatment of persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients on methotrexate (MTX) and also to determine the predictors of adding bDMARDs to treatment. This study included 86 oligoarticular JIA patients on MTX. Patients were divided into two groups receiving MTX (n = 69) and MTX plus bDMARD (n = 17). Predictors of adding bDMARDs were investigated by comparing demographic, clinical features and laboratory findings. Gender, age at diagnosis, time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis, and disease duration, the number and distribution of affected joint at the time of diagnosis were similar in both groups. The mean JADAS10 at the time of diagnosis were 18.8 ± 4.2 and 19.5 ± 6.4 in the MTX and MTX plus bDMARDs groups, respectively (p = 0.68). JADAS10 at 3rd and 6th month were significantly higher in patients on MTX plus bDMARDs (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the risk of adding bDMARD was shown to increase 1.24-fold (p = 0.004, 95% CI: 1.07-1.43) for each point increase on the JADAS 10 at 3rd months. The number (p = 0.64) or type (p = 0.18) of joint involvement at disease onset were not predictors of adding a bDMARD. CONCLUSION: JADAS10 indicating ongoing severe disease activity at 3rd and 6th months rather than baseline JADAS10 is associated with the addition of bDMARDs. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Oligoarticular JIA patients have the best outcomes among JIA categories and respond favorably to first-line therapies such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intraarticular corticosteroid injections. • Clinically inactive disease rates have increased with the widespread use of biological agents in oligoarticular JIA patients who have not responded to initial therapies. WHAT IS NEW: • Approximately one-fifth of patients with persistent oligoarticular JIA on methotrexate may require the addition of a biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug during follow-up. • The JADAS10 calculated at 3 and 6 months is a valuable tool to identify patients who should be added biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in persistent oligoarticular JIA.

>Efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of granulomatous mastitis: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is an inflammatory breast disorder of unknown etiology. This benign condition can mimic the clinical presentation of breast cancer and is characterized by symptoms such as breast pain, erythema, and swelling. Over the past few years, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) have been increasingly used to manage this condition. However, strong evidence to support their use is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of DMARDs in the management of IGM. METHODS: A systematic literature review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, directory of open access journals (DOAJ) and Cochrane Library from their inception until May 2024. We included retrospective and prospective studies while excluding case reports and case series of less than 10 patients. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our eligibility criteria. Fifteen studies were retrospective, while 2 were prospective. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Of these, 16 papers examined the effect of methotrexate on IGM, revealing significant disease improvement in most cases. Several of the studies indicated that patients treated with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil also achieved favorable responses. CONCLUSION: Given the rarity of IGM, only a limited number of studies have explored the use of DMARDs as a pharmacological treatment option. A significant barrier to advancing our understanding is the substantial heterogeneity in the quality and volume of data provided by these studies. Therefore, there is a need for well-designed, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to rigorously assess the efficacy of DMARDs in the treatment of IGM.

Biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis: current state and future perspectives.

Psoriatic arthritis is a medical condition that lies at the intersection of various fields of medicine, and its therapy always requires a comprehensive, holistic approach. Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) constitute an extremely effective treatment method for PsA, provided that appropriate principles for patient qualification for the drug are followed, along with subsequent monitoring of the response to treatment. Based on their mechanisms of action, four main groups of bDMARDs used in PsA can be distinguished (TNF inhibitors, IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, CTLA4 agonists). Clinical trials are ongoing in search of registration for additional bDMARDs, and the tasks for doctors and scientists worldwide include patient education, increasing treatment accessibility, and optimizing its costs.

The temporal association between adverse drug reactions and antirheumatic drugs utilisation in Western Australia: a retrospective study from real-world data (1995-2015).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can result in morbidity, mortality, and higher healthcare costs. Given the limited information available on ADRs associated with antirheumatic medications, this study aims to analyse and compare ADR reporting for these drugs in the pharmacovigilance datasets of Western Australia (WA) and the United States (US). METHODS: Therapeutic Goods Administration provided WA pharmacovigilance data of selected antirheumatic drugs to from 1995 to 2015. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) for WA case reports was compared to corresponding USA pharmacovigilance data by assessing the disproportionality of each ADR. clinically significant or true ADRs were determined using the Evans 2001 criteria (n > 2, chi-square > 4, PRR > 2). RESULTS: A total of 232 reports were found in WA, mostly on sixty-nine women aged 45 to 69. Methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, sulfasalazine, and infliximab had the highest reported ADRs, related to gastrointestinal disorders. Patients who used biological agents in WA had 2.7 times the likelihood of reporting true ADRs compared to conventional antirheumatic drugs. The ADR rates in the two datasets were comparable over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The PRR values of ADRs were consistent between WA and US databases. Methotrexate and infliximab use were commonly associated with ADR reports in WA females, with incidence rates comparable to the US; while patients using biological agents were more likely to report true ADRs than those on conventional antirheumatic drugs in WA.

Drug persistence in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases during a major economic crisis: results from a nationwide cross-sectional online survey.

To evaluate the drug persistence in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) during the current economic crisis in Lebanon and to estimate predictors of persistence. A nationwide multicentric cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire was conducted in Lebanon with patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs) and non-inflammatory RMDs controls between July and October 2022. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized as conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV), and targeted synthetic (ts). Persistence was defined as "number of tablets or injections taken during the past month versus prescribed". The percentage of patients who discontinued or changed treatment due to cost or non-availability was reported. Factors associated with persistence were identified using multivariable linear regression. The study included 317 patients with RMDs (286 CIRDs); mean age 49.5 years, 68% females, 58% reporting currently low economic level. Persistence at one month was low for tsDMARDs (36%) and bDMARDs (SC55%, IV63%), and acceptable for csDMARDs (88%). A persistence ≥80% was found in 23.3% of patients on tsDMARDs, 42.9% on SC bDMARDs, 45.0% on IV bDMARDs, and 74.7% on csDMARDs. During the past 6 months, 55.8% of CIRD patients discontinued or changed treatment due to non-availability (45.3%) or cost (21.2%). Persistence was positively associated with finding alternative sources such as buying abroad (36%), depending on friends or families abroad (20%), charities (10%), and negatively associated with unemployment and low financial status. Persistence was significantly compromised for essential antirheumatic drugs and was mostly driven by treatment unavailability and cost.

[Head-to-head studies on radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis]. / Head-to-head-Studien zur Röntgenprogression bei axialer Spondyloarthritis.

In this review article four clinical comparative studies in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) are presented and discussed. SURPASS as the only head-to-head study investigated the effect of adalimumab biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bsDMARD) or secukinumab on radiographic progression over a time period of 2 years. Overall, the radiographic progression of the spine was low and no significant difference between adalimumab bsDMARD or secukinumab was noted. The three other studies were not constructed as direct head-to-head studies but compared the efficacy of non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSARD) with and without simultaneous treatment with biological DMARDs (bDMARD). The CONSUL study showed no statistically significant difference in the delay of radiographic progression of the spine over 2 years in radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients, who underwent either combined treatment with golimumab and celecoxib or treatment with golimumab alone over 2 years. The ESTHER study showed that patients with early axSpA active inflammatory lesions, which were detected by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), showed a significantly greater improvement under treatment with etanercept than those treated with sulfasalazine. The INFAST study showed that patients with early active axSpA who received a combined treatment of infliximab and naproxen, achieved a clinical remission twice as frequently as those who only received naproxen. Therefore, for the endpoint of radiological progression no difference could be shown in the inhibition of radiological progression between the mechanisms of action investigated. The comparative data for the endpoint of clinical efficacy showed that patients with bDMARDs showed a clearly better response to treatment than patients with NSAR or conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD).

Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search.

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective product information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Treatment patterns of individualized real-life tapering approaches based on shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world evidence on patient-individual tapering patterns of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Data obtained through a controlled prospective cohort study in Germany conducted from July 2018 to March 2021 were analyzed. Participants consist of RA patients in sustained remission who were eligible for DMARD tapering at enrolment. Data from RA patients who experienced tapering of DMARDs at least once during the observational period (n = 200) were used. Descriptive analyses of medical outcomes at baseline and at time of first tapering, time to first tapering, tapering patterns by substance group, and tapering intensity were documented. RESULTS: We did not observe meaningful differences in either disease activity or quality of life measures between substance groups at enrolment, time of first tapering, and at 6 or 12 months after tapering. Median time until first tapering varied between substance groups (csDMARDs: 108 days; bDMARDs: 189 days; combination: 119 days). Most patients received one iteration of tapering only (147/200 patients, 73.5%). Dose reduction was applied for patients treated with csDMARDs (79/86 patients, 91.8%), spacing of interval was the most frequent strategy for patients treated with bDMARDs only (43/48 patients, 89.5%). Necessity for increased DMARD dosage was observed in only 10% of patients (20/200). Tapering intensity by substance was overall heterogenous, indicating high individualization. CONCLUSION: We identify highly heterogeneous tapering patterns between substance groups and within substances. Identification and recognition of patient-individual approaches of tapering will help to further improve the management of RA for both patients and rheumatologists.

[Course of the COVID-19 pandemic in pediatric rheumatological patients in Germany during the first 3 years (2020-2022)]. / Verlauf der COVID-19-Pandemie bei pädiatrisch-rheumatologischen Patienten in Deutschland über die ersten 3 Jahre (2020 bis 2022).

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has influenced the world over the last 3 years. Although the risk of a severe course is low in children, it can be influenced by chronic rheumatic diseases or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or immunomodulatory medication. The German register for biologics in pediatric rheumatology (BIKER) documented systematic data from 68 centers on the occurrence, presentation and outcome of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in children with rheumatic diseases. Between March 2020 and December 2022, a total of 927 SARS-CoV­2 infections in 884 patients could be reported and analyzed in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was the most frequent diagnosis (716 infections) followed by genetic autoinflammation (103 infections), systemic autoimmune diseases (78 infections), idiopathic uveitis (25 infections) and vasculitis (5 infections). Only four patients were treated as inpatients. A 3.5-year-old female patient died during the first wave from encephalopathy and respiratory failure. The patient was treated with methotrexate (MTX) and steroids for systemic JIA. Genetic tests revealed a previously unknown congenital immune defect. No other patient had to be ventilated or treated on the intensive care unit. A case of uncomplicated pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) was registered in a patient with JIA treated with MTX. At the time of the infection over 60% of the patients were treated with standard disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and/or biologics. Although the patients treated with MTX showed a slightly longer duration of symptoms, the antirheumatic treatment did not appear to have a negative influence on the severity or outcome of the SARS-CoV­2 infection.

Risk of hospitalized infections in older elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab or other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Evaluation of data from a Japanese claims database.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the incidence rates of hospitalized infections (HIs) between tocilizumab (TCZ) and other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in adults aged ≥75 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used a Japanese claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) to perform a retrospective longitudinal population-based study in patients with RA who were prescribed b/tsDMARDs between 2014 and 2019. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for HIs in three age groups (<65, ≥65 and <75, and ≥75 years). RESULTS: Of 5506 patients, 2265 (41.1%) were <65 years, 1709 (31.0%) were 65-74 years, and 1532 (27.8%) were ≥75 years. Crude incidence rates (/100 person-years) of HIs were 3.99, 7.27, and 10.77, respectively. In the oldest group, aRRs (95% confidence interval) for HIs (b/tsDMARDs versus TCZ) were as follows: etanercept, 2.40 (1.24-4.61); adalimumab, 1.90 (0.75-4.83); golimumab, 1.21 (0.66-2.23); and abatacept, 0.89 (0.49-1.62). In the other age groups, the noticeable difference was a lower aRR of etanercept versus TCZ in the youngest group (0.30, 0.11-0.85). CONCLUSION: In patients with RA aged ≥75 years, b/tsDMARDs have a similar risk of HIs to tocilizumab except for etanercept.

Trends in treatment for patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Data from the NinJa study.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to investigate trends in the treatment of patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) using data from the National Database of Rheumatic Diseases in Japan (NinJa). METHODS: Patients registered in the National Database of Rheumatic Diseases in Japan were classified according to the disease onset: at <65 years (young-onset rheumatoid arthritis); at 65-74 years (early LORA); and at ≥75 years (late LORA). Chronological changes in the treatment and disease activity were compared. RESULTS: A total of 7178, 13,171, 15,295, and 15,943 patients were evaluated in 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019, respectively. In all groups, the use of methotrexate gradually decreased, whereas that of biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) increased; the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors decreased, whereas that of non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors increased. LORA was characterized by more single DMARD use and less methotrexate and biological/targeted synthetic DMARD use. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors were used less frequently, whereas abatacept was utilized more frequently in late versus early LORA. Conventional synthetic DMARD (excluding methotrexate) and glucocorticoid use was higher in late versus early LORA. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis revealed chronological changes in the treatment of LORA in Japan. Differences between early and late LORA suggest that patients are not a homogeneous population.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Studies published between 2000 and 2021 were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web and clinical trial registries. The risk of bias was assessed according to the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project to promote evidence-based medicine in Japan. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30/50/70 responses at 3, 6 and 12 months were 64.8%/50.3%/27.9%, 85.7%/71.4%/42.9% and 80.0%/50.0%/40.0%, respectively. Outcomes on systemic symptoms, joint symptoms and activities of daily living were not obtained. No macrophage activation syndrome or infusion reaction occurred. Serious infection occurred in 2.6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept improved the disease activity index. In addition, abatacept was as safe as interleukin-6 (IL -6) and IL-1 inhibitors. However, both the efficacy and safety data in this systematic review should be reviewed with caution because their quality of evidence is low or very low. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic JIA, especially its efficacy on joint symptoms.

[Reduction in the need for glucocorticoids on the background of therapy with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from real clinical practice].

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend reducing the use of glucocorticoids (GCs) due to the high risk of associated complications. AIM: To determine the frequency of GC cancellations and dose reductions in real clinical practice, while taking into account active RA therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 303 patients with RA reliable according to ACR/EULAR criteria (women 79.9%, age 52.8±13.3, disease duration 9 [4; 16] years, DAS-28-CRP 4.9±1.0, RF seropositivity 77.4%, ACPA seropositivity 70.3%), who were prescribed or changed therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or Janus kinase inhibitors (iJAK) due to disease exacerbation and ineffectiveness of previous treatment. All patients initially received GC (7.7±3.8 mg/day equivalent of prednisolone). After adjustment of therapy, 42.9% of patients received methotrexate, 27.6% leflunomide, 2.5% sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, or a combination with an Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 63.7% bDMARDs, and 7.2% iJAK. The need for GC intake was assessed by a telephone survey conducted 6 months after the start of follow-up. RESULTS: Telephone survey was possible in 274 (90.4%) persons. There was a significant decrease in pain intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS 0-10) from 6.3±1.4 to 4.3±2.4 (p<0.001), fatigue (NRS) from 6.7±2.3 to 5.2±2.1 (p<0.001), and functional impairment (NRS) from 5.4±2.1 to 3.9±2.0 (p<0.001). A positive PASS index (symptom status acceptable to patients) was noted in 139 (50.7%) patients. GC cancellation was noted in 19.7%, dose reduction in 25.9%, maintaining the same dose in 42.7%, and dose increase in 11.7%. CONCLUSION: Against the background of intensive RA therapy, including combination of DMARDs with bDMARDs or iJAK, complete withdrawal or reduction of GC dose was achieved in less than half (45.6%) of patients after 6 months.