In vitro evaluation of a new viscoelastometry-based point-of-care analyzer.

INTRODUCTION: The VCM is a point-of-care analyzer using a new viscoelastometry technique for rapid assessment of hemostasis on fresh whole blood. Its characteristics would make it suitable for use in austere environments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the VCM in terms of repeatability, reproducibility and interanalyzer correlation, reference values in our population, correlation with standard coagulation assays and platelet count, correlation with the TEG5000 analyzer and resistance to stress conditions mimicking an austere environment. METHODS: Repeatability, reproducibility, and interanalyzer correlation were performed on quality control samples (n = 10). Reference values were determined from blood donor samples (n = 60). Correlations with standard biological assays were assessed from ICU patients (n = 30) and blood donors (n = 60) samples. Correlation with the TEG5000 was assessed from blood donor samples. Evaluation of vibration resistance was performed on blood donor (n = 5) and quality control (n = 5) samples. RESULTS: The CVs for repeatability and reproducibility ranged from 0% to 11%. Interanalyzer correlation found correlation coefficients (r2) ranging from 0.927 to 0.997. Our reference values were consistent with those provided by the manufacturer. No robust correlation was found with conventional coagulation tests. The correlation with the TEG5000 was excellent with r2 ranging from 0.75 to 0.92. Resistance to stress conditions was excellent. CONCLUSION: The VCM analyzer is a reliable, easy-to-use instrument that correlates well with the TEG5000. Despite some logistical constraints, the results suggest that it can be used in austere environments. Further studies are required before its implementation.

Aggressive versus conservative fluid resuscitation in septic hemodialysis patients.

PURPOSE: Sepsis and bacterial infections are common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to compare patients with ESRD on hemodialysis presenting to hospital with severe sepsis or septic shock who received <20 ml/kg of intravenous fluid to those who received ≥20 ml/kg during initial resuscitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with ICD codes for discharge diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, ESRD, and hemodialysis admitted to our institution between 2015 and 2018. RESULTS: We present outcomes for a total of 104 patients - 51 patients in conservative group and 53 in aggressive group. The mean age was 69.5 ± 11.2 years and 71 ± 11.5 years in the conservative group and aggressive group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of ICU admission, and ICU or hospital length of stay between the two groups. Complications such as volume overload, rate of intubation, and urgent dialysis were not found to be significantly different. CONCLUSION: We found that aggressive fluid resuscitation with ≥20 ml/kg may not be detrimental in the initial resuscitation of ESRD patients with SeS or SS. However, a clinical decision of volume responsiveness should be made on a case-by-case basis rather than a universal approach for fluid resuscitation in ESRD patients.

Acute Kidney Injury following Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol related fluid restriction on kidney function and the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury and 3-month kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospectively collected, single institution cohort we studied 296 consecutive patients (146 pre-enhanced recovery after surgery vs 150 enhanced recovery after surgery) who underwent radical cystectomy from 2010 to 2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, time to bowel movements, time to tolerate regular diet, postoperative complications and 30-day readmission rate. Study limitations include its retrospective design and relatively modest sample size. RESULTS: We observed an increased rate of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients on the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (42.7% vs 30.1%, OR 1.725, p=0.025). On multivariate analysis enhanced recovery after surgery protocol remained a significant predictor of acute kidney injury even when controlling for other covariates including baseline kidney function (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.04-3.30, p=0.036). Patients with postoperative acute kidney injury demonstrated significantly higher odds of stage 3 chronic kidney disease at 3 months even after controlling for baseline renal function (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.9, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following radical cystectomy was associated with a higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients who had baseline chronic kidney disease which could be related to the restricted perioperative fluid management mandated by enhanced recovery after surgery. Use of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol did not impact the length of hospital stay or readmission rates.

Nurse and Physician Perceptions of Working With Goal-Directed Therapy in the Perioperative Period.

PURPOSE: To explore nurse and physician perceptions of working with and collaborating about arterial wave analysis for goal-directed therapy to identify barriers and facilitators for use in anesthesia departments, postanesthesia care units, and intensive care units. DESIGN: A qualitative study drawing on ethnographic principles in a field study using the technique of nonparticipating observation and semistructured interviews. METHODS: Data collection occurred using semistructured interviews with nurses (n = 23) and physicians (n = 12) and field observations in three anesthetic departments. An inductive approach for content analysis was used. FINDINGS: The results showed one overarching theme Interprofessional collaboration encourage and impede based on three categories: (1) interprofessional and professional challenges; (2) obtaining competencies; and (3) understanding optimal fluid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers identified related to interprofessional collaboration. Nurses and physicians were dependent on each other's skills and capabilities to use arterial wave analysis. Education of nurses and physicians is important to secure optimal use of goal-directed therapy.

Effect of Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy in Postcardiac Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) provides preset goals to be achieved by intravenous fluid therapy and inotropic therapy with earliest detection of change in the hemodynamic profile. Improved outcome in cardiac surgery patients has been shown by perioperative volume optimization, while postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay can be decreased by improving oxygen delivery. Our aim of this study was to study the outcome of EGDT in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective single institute study involving a total of 478 patients. Patients were divided into group I, who received standard hospital care, and group II, who received EGDT. Postoperatively, patients were observed in ICU for 72 hours. Hemodynamics, laboratory data, fluid bolus, inotrope score, complication, ventilatory time, and mortality data were collected. RESULTS: Postoperative ventilatory period (11.12 ± 10.11 vs 9.45 ± 8.87, p = 0.0719) and frequency of change in inotropes (1.900 ± 0.9 vs 1.19 ± 0.61, p = 0.0717) were lower in group II. Frequency of crystalloid boluses (1.33 ± 0.65 vs 1.75 ± 1.09, p = 0.0126), and quantity of packed cell volume (PCV) used (1.63 ± 1.03 vs 2.04 ± 1.42, p = 0.0364) were highly significant in group II. Use of colloids was higher in group II and was statistically significant (1.98 ± 1.99 vs 3.05 ± 2.17, p = 0.0012). The acute kidney injury (AKI) rate was (58 (23.10%) vs 30 (13.21%), p = 0.007) lower and statistically significant (p = 0.007) in group II. CONCLUSION: Early goal-directed therapy reduces the postoperative ventilatory period, frequency of changes in inotropes, and incidence of AKI, and decreases ventilation hours, number of times inotropes changed, and AKI. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patel H, Parikh N, Shah R, Patel R, Thosani R, Shah P, et al. Effect of Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy in Postcardiac Surgery Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(5):321-326.

Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for the resuscitation of patients with sepsis; however, the recent evidences quickly evolve and convey conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of EGDT on mortality in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: We searched electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared EGDT with usual care or lactate-guided therapy in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock. Predefined primary outcome was all-cause mortality at final follow-up. RESULTS: We included 13 trials enrolling 5268 patients. Compared with usual care, EGDT was associated with decreased mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98; 4664 patients, 8 trials; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] quality of evidence was moderate). Compared with lactate clearance-guided therapy, EGDT was associated with increased mortality (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.24-2.06; 604 patients, 5 trials; GRADE quality of evidence was low). Patients assigned to EGDT received more intravenous fluid, red cell transfusion, vasopressor infusion, and dobutamine use within the first 6 hours than those assigned to usual care (all P values < .00001). CONCLUSION: Adults with severe sepsis and septic shock who received EGDT had a lower mortality than those given usual care, the benefit may mainly be attributed to treatments administered within the first 6 hours. However, the underlying mechanisms by which lactate clearance-guided therapy benefits these patients are yet to be investigated.

Factors Affecting Early Treatment Goals of Sepsis Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a major cause of emergency medicine admission. It is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Even though sepsis is common in the Indian subcontinent, there is a paucity of data on the management of sepsis in India. The aim was to study the factors affecting early treatment goals. METHODS: All clinically suspected sepsis patients consenting to be part of the study were included. The diagnosis of sepsis was made by the treating physician in the emergency department as per the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines criteria. All cases were managed as per institutional treatment protocol. The patients were prospectively followed up and the time taken to achieve the goal-directed sepsis bundle documented and analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 75 patients studied, the 3-hour(h) bundles were achieved in 70.7% of cases and 6-h bundles were achieved in 84% of cases. Meantime for obtaining blood culture was 107 min and administration of first dose antibiotics was 134 min. Thirty patients failed to achieve the early treatment goals, of which six were under-triaged, seven due to physicians delay in recognizing sepsis, 11 due to logistical delay, and six were due to financial constraints. CONCLUSION: The sepsis bundle goals were not achieved because of various factors such as under triaging, delay in diagnosis, logistical delay, and financial constraints. Further studies on whether sensitization of medical fraternity about sepsis, implementation of insurance policies for patient care or better point of care diagnostics would aid in achieving the bundles may be evaluated further.

The Effects of Alternative Resuscitation Strategies on Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Septic Shock.

RATIONALE: Septic shock is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), and fluid resuscitation is a major part of therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine if structured resuscitation designed to alter fluid, blood, and vasopressor use affects the development or severity of AKI or outcomes. METHODS: Ancillary study to the ProCESS (Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock) trial of alternative resuscitation strategies (two protocols vs. usual care) for septic shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 1,243 patients and classified AKI using serum creatinine and urine output. We determined recovery status at hospital discharge, examined rates of renal replacement therapy and fluid overload, and measured biomarkers of kidney damage. Among patients without evidence of AKI at enrollment, 37.6% of protocolized care and 38.1% of usual care patients developed kidney injury (P = 0.90). AKI duration (P = 0.59) and rates of renal replacement therapy did not differ between study arms (6.9% for protocolized care and 4.3% for usual care; P = 0.08). Fluid overload occurred in 8.3% of protocolized care and 6.3% of usual care patients (P = 0.26). Among patients with severe AKI, complete and partial recovery was 50.7 and 13.2% for protocolized patients and 49.1 and 13.4% for usual care patients (P = 0.93). Sixty-day hospital mortality was 6.2% for patients without AKI, 16.8% for those with stage 1, and 27.7% for stages 2 to 3. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic shock, AKI is common and associated with adverse outcomes, but it is not influenced by protocolized resuscitation compared with usual care.

The recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock: a guide for non-intensivists.

Sepsis is common, often fatal and requires rapid interventions to improve outcomes. While the optimal management of sepsis in the intensive care setting is the focus of extensive research interest, the mainstay of the recognition and initial management of sepsis will occur outside the intensive care setting. Therefore, it is key that institutions and clinicians remain well informed of the current updates in sepsis management and continue to use them to deliver appropriate and timely interventions to enhance patient survival. This review discusses the latest updates in sepsis care including the new consensus definition of sepsis, the outcome of the proCESS, ProMISe and ARISE trials of early goal directed therapy (EGDT), and the most recent guidelines from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

Does Early Goal-Directed Therapy Decrease Mortality Compared with Standard Care in Patients with Septic Shock?

BACKGROUND: Current international guidelines for the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock recommend that patients receive targeted care to various physiologic endpoints, thereby optimizing tissue perfusion and oxygenation. These recommendations are primarily derived from a protocol published >15 years ago, which was viewed by many as complex and was therefore not widely adopted. Instead, many emergency physicians focused on the administration of early antibiotics, source control, aggressive fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications as needed to maintain mean arterial blood pressure, and careful monitoring of these patients. The primary goal of this literature search was to determine if there is a mortality benefit to the early goal-directed protocol recommended by current international sepsis guidelines compared to current usual care. METHODS: A MEDLINE literature search was performed for studies published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. Studies were limited to the English language, human randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, prospective trials, and retrospective cohort trials that met specific keyword search criteria. Case reports, case series, and review articles were excluded. All selected articles then underwent a structured review by the authors. RESULTS: Seven thousand four hundred twenty studies were initially screened; after the final application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were formally analyzed. Each study then underwent a rigorous review and evaluation from which a formal recommendation was made. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in mortality between current usual care and the goal-directed approach recommended by current international guidelines for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Importance of Pharmacy Involvement in the Treatment of Sepsis.

Purpose: A review of the impact of pharmacists on appropriate medication selection, timing of administration, and as members of a multidisciplinary sepsis response team. Summary: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), currently recommended by the 2013 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for the management of patients with sepsis, includes the administration of appropriate antibiotics in patients with septic shock within the first hour. Multidisciplinary teams containing pharmacists have been shown to decrease time to antibiotic delivery, time to antibiotic administration, and patient mortality. The pharmacist can act as a drug information resource, expedite the medication verification and procurement process, and offer suggestions on how to better manage the patients. Pharmacists are often consulted for dosing and antibiotic selection recommendations for patients with sepsis, but they can also help increase the appropriateness of antibiotics selected. Additional recommendations and interventions made by pharmacists include fluid management and vasopressor facilitation for the more severe patients. A sepsis management team that included a pharmacist increased the number of patients receiving appropriate antibiotics within the first hour by as much as 22-fold. Another study has demonstrated that intensive care units with a pharmacist are associated with a 4% decrease in sepsis patient mortality compared to those without a pharmacist. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary teams containing pharmacists have been shown to decrease time to administration of antibiotics, increase appropriate selection of medications, and decrease mortality; they may also decrease overall health care costs.

The effect of early goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has recommended early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) as an essential strategy to decrease mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. However, three latest multicenter trials failed to show its benefit in the patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. This article was to evaluate the effect of EGDT on the mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were identified from January 1, 2001 to June 13, 2015. With both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs selected, a meta-analysis on the effects of EGDT on all identified trials was performed. The primary outcome was the inhospital mortality. In subgroup, RCTs and non-RCTs were analyzed, respectively. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs and 10 non-RCTs involving 3285 patients in EGDT group and 3233 patients in the control group were identified. Pooled analyses of all studies showed significant difference in the inhospital mortality between the EGDT group and the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.94; P = 0.003) with substantial heterogeneity (χ2 = 24.93, P = 0.04, I(2) = 44%). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant difference in inhospital mortality between the EGDT group and the control group (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.10; P = 0.51) with no significant difference in heterogeneity (χ2 = 6.62, P = 0.16, I(2) = 40%) in RCTs. In non-RCTs, EGDT significantly reduced inhospital mortality (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0003) with no significant difference in heterogeneity (χ2 = 11.96, P = 0.22, I(2) = 25%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that EGDT can significantly reduce the mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Impact of an Antibiotic-specific Sepsis Bundle on Appropriate and Timely Antibiotic Administration for Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 1 h of severe sepsis diagnosis. Few sepsis bundles exist in the literature emphasizing initiation of specific antibiotic therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of an antibiotic-specific sepsis bundle on the timely initiation of appropriate antibiotics. METHODS: For this before-and-after interventional study, the sepsis bundle at this 803-bed academic tertiary-care facility was redesigned to include specific antibiotic selection and dosing, based on suspected source of infection and susceptibility patterns. Protocol education and advertising was completed and bundle-specific antibiotics were put in the automated medication cabinet. RESULTS: Stepwise analysis of timely initiation of appropriate antibiotics included: 1) Was the initial antibiotic appropriate? 2) If so, was it initiated within 1 h of diagnosis? 3) If so, were all necessary appropriate antibiotics started? and 4) If so, were they started within 3 h of diagnosis? In comparing the 3-month-before group and 3-month-after group (n = 124), the appropriate initial antibiotic was started in 33.9% vs. 54.8% of patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.93, p = 0.03) and within 1 h in 22.6% vs. 14.5% of patients (OR 1.71, 95% CI 0.62-4.92, p = 0.36), respectively. All necessary appropriate antibiotics were initiated in 16.1% vs. 12.9% of patients (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.42-4.10, p = 0.80), and within 3 h in 14.5% vs. 9.7% of patients, respectively (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46-5.78, p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: An updated antibiotic-specific sepsis bundle, with antibiotics put in an automated medication cabinet, can result in improvements in the initiation of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy for severe sepsis in the emergency department.

Sepsis management: An evidence-based approach.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines have outlined an early goal directed therapy (EGDT) which demonstrates a standardized approach to ensure prompt and effective management of sepsis. Having said that, there are barriers associated with the application of evidence-based practice, which often lead to an overall poorer adherence to guidelines. Considering the global burden of disease, data from low- to middle-income countries is scarce. Asia is the largest continent but most Asian countries do not have a well-developed healthcare system and compliance rates to resuscitation and management bundles are as low as 7.6% and 3.5%, respectively. Intensive care units are not adequately equipped and financial concerns limit implementation of expensive treatment strategies. Healthcare policy-makers should be notified in order to alleviate financial restrictions and ensure delivery of standard care to septic patients.

Could a protocol based on early goal-directed therapy improve outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the Intensive Care Unit setting?

CONTEXT: Sepsis is a disease with high incidence and mortality. Among the interventions of the resuscitation bundle, the early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended. AIMS: The aim was to evaluate outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock using EGDT in real life compared with patients who did not undergo it in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: retrospective and observational cohort study at tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the patients admitted to ICU were screened for severe sepsis or septic shock and included in a registry and followed. The patients were allocated in two groups according to submission or not to EGDT. RESULTS: A total of 268 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were included. EGDT was employed in 97/268 patients. The general mortality was higher in no early goal-directed therapy (no-EGDT) then in EGDT groups (49.7% vs. 37.1% [P = 0.04] in hospital and 40.4% vs. 29.9% [P = 0.08] in the ICU, respectively. The general length of stay [LOS] in the no-EGDT and EGDT groups was 45.0 ± 59.8 vs. 29.1 ± 30.1 days [P = 0.002] in hospital and 17.4 ± 19.4 vs. 9.1 ± 9.8 days [P < 0.001] in the ICU, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows reduced mortality and LOS in patients submitted to EGDT in the ICU setting. A simplified EGDT without central venous oxygen saturation is an important tool for sepsis management.

Early goal-directed therapy reduces mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Survival sepsis campaign guidelines have promoted early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) as a means for reduction of mortality. On the other hand, there were conflicting results coming out of recently published meta-analyses on mortality benefits of EGDT in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. On top of that, the findings of three recently done randomized clinical trials (RCTs) showed no survival benefit by employing EGDT compared to usual care. Therefore, we aimed to do a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of EGDT on mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. METHODOLOGY: We included RCTs that compared EGDT with usual care in our meta-analysis. We searched in Hinari, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials electronic databases and other articles manually from lists of references of extracted articles. Our primary end point was overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of nine trails comprising 4783 patients included in our analysis. We found that EGDT significantly reduced mortality in a random-effect model (RR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.94; P = 0.008;   I (2) =50%). We also did subgroup analysis stratifying the studies by the socioeconomic status of the country where studies were conducted, risk of bias, the number of sites where the trials were conducted, setting of trials, publication year, and sample size. Accordingly, trials carried out in low to middle economic income countries (RR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; P = 0.002; I (2) = 34%) significantly reduced mortality compared to those in higher income countries (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.33-1.06; P = 0.28; I(2) = 29%). On the other hand, patients receiving EGDT had longer length of hospital stay compared to the usual care (mean difference, 0.49; 95% CI, -0.04-1.02; P = 0.07; I (2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: The result of our study showed that EGDT significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Paradoxically, EGDT increased the length of hospital stay compared to usual routine care.

Improving perioperative care in low-resource settings with goal-directed therapy: a narrative review.

Perioperative Goal-Directed Therapy (PGDT) has significantly showed to decrease complications and risk of death in high-risk patients according to numerous meta-analyses. The main goal of PGDT is to individualize the therapy with fluids, inotropes, and vasopressors, during and after surgery, according to patients' needs in order to prevent organic dysfunction development. In this opinion paper we aimed to focus a discussion on possible alternatives to invasive hemodynamic monitoring in low resource settings.

Time is of the Essence: Why Goals-of-Care Conversations and Prognosis Documentation Matters in Advanced Cancer Patients in an Integrated Health System.

Background: Advanced cancer patients benefit less from aggressive therapies and more from goal-directed palliative management. Early and clearly documented goals-of-care discussions, including end-of-life decision making, are essential in this patient population. Integrated healthcare systems are comprehensive care models associated with improved quality of care and lower mortality compared to other healthcare models. The role of advance care planning within our system is understudied. Methods: Patients 18 years and older with a diagnosis of advanced-stage cancer were identified over a 6-month period. Expert panel review was performed to evaluate medical appropriateness of the selected diagnostic workup and management. The role and extent of care planning was reviewed in association with the clinical context. Results: In a cohort of 82 patients, evidence-based and individualized appropriateness of medical management was found to be consistent for all patients. Eighty-two percent of patients elected for oncologic-based treatment, 5% pursued active surveillance, and 11% did not receive treatment. Seventy-three percent of patients were referred to palliative care. Fifty-six percent of patients had a full goals-of-care conversation documented; yet only 9% of goals-of-care conversations were documented by an oncologist. Prognosis was documented fully for only 22% of patients. At the end of the study period, 43 patients were deceased (52%), further indicating the critical importance of documentation. Conclusions: Within our integrated health system, we found consistent guideline- and patient-directed diagnosis and management, along with frequent integration of palliative care services. Goals-of-care conversation and prognosis documentation, especially by the oncologist, remains an area of needed improvement.

The GENESIS project (GENeralized Early Sepsis Intervention Strategies): a multicenter quality improvement collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock have been consistently observed with implementation of early best practice intervention strategies or the 6-hour resuscitation bundle (RB) in single-center studies. This multicenter study examines the in-hospital mortality effect of GENeralized Early Sepsis Intervention Strategies (GENESIS) when utilized in community and tertiary care settings. METHODS: This study was comprised of 2 strategies to assess treatment. The first was a prospective before-and-after observational comparison of historical controls to patients receiving the RB after implementation of GENESIS in 4 community and 4 tertiary hospitals. The second was a concurrent examination comparing patients not achieving all components of the RB to those achieving all components of the RB in 1 community and 2 tertiary care hospitals after implementation of GENESIS. These 4 subgroups merged to comprise a control (historical controls treated before GENESIS and RB not achieved after GENESIS) group and treatment (patients treated after GENESIS and RB achieved after GENESIS) group for comparison. RESULTS: The control group comprised 1554 patients not receiving the RB (952 before GENESIS and 602 RB not achieved after GENESIS). The treatment group comprised 4801 patients receiving the RB (4109 after GENESIS and 692 RB achieved after GENESIS). Patients receiving the RB (treatment group) experienced an in-hospital mortality reduction of 14% (42.8%-28.8%, P < .001) and a 5.1 day decrease in hospital length of stay (20.7 vs 15.6, P < .001) compared to those not receiving the RB (control group). Similar mortality reductions were seen in the before-and-after (43% vs 29%, P < .001) or concurrent RB not achieved versus achieved (42.5% vs 27.2%, P < .001) subgroup comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock receiving the RB in community and tertiary hospitals experience similar and significant reductions in mortality and hospital length of stay. These findings remained consistent when examined in both before-and-after and concurrent analyses. Early sepsis intervention strategies are associated with 1 life being saved for every 7 treated.

[Viscoelasticity-based point of care coagulation diagnostics in the context of resuscitation room management of severely injured and bleeding trauma patients : Diagnostics and treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy]. / Viskoelastizitätsbasierte "Point-of-care"-Gerinnungsdiagnostik im Kontext des Schockraummanagements von blutenden Traumapatienten : Diagnostik und Therapie der traumainduzierten Koagulopathie.

Uncontrolled bleeding with associated trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) remains the leading cause of preventable death after severe trauma. Meanwhile, TIC is recognized as a separate clinical entity with substantial impact on downstream morbidity and mortality. In clinical practice severely injured and bleeding patients are often still being treated according to established damage control surgery (DCS) procedures with surgical bleeding control and empirical transfusion of classical blood products in predefined ratios in the sense of damage control resuscitation (DCR); however, algorithms are also available, which have been constructed from established viscoelasticity-based point of care (POC) diagnostic procedures and target value-oriented treatments. The latter enables a timely qualitative assessment of coagulation function from whole blood at bedside and provides rapid and clinically useful information on the presence, development and dynamics of the coagulation disorder. The early implementation of viscoelasticity-based POC procedures in the context of resuscitation room management of severely injured and bleeding patients was uniformly associated with reductions in potentially harmful blood products, especially overtransfusions, and an overall improvement in outcome including survival. The present article reviews the clinical questions around the use of viscoelasticity-based procedures as well as recommendations for the early and acute management of bleeding trauma patients taking the current literature into account.