Intersections and Clinical Translations of Diabetes Mellitus with Cancer Promotion, Progression and Prognosis.

The association between cancer and dysglycemia has been well documented. It is underappreciated, however, that sustained dysglycemia could potentially be a catalyst toward a pro-cancer physiologic milieu and/or increase the burden of cancer. Hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and energy metabolism at large impact a cascade of growth pathways, epi/genetic modifications, and mitochondrial changes that could feasibly link to tumor processes. Oxidative stress is a recurring motif in cell dysfunction: in diabetes, oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) feature prominently in the damage and demise of pancreatic beta cells, as well as cell damage contributing to diabetes-related complications. Oxidative stress may be one intersection at which metabolic and oncogenic processes cross paths with deleterious results in the development of precancer, cancer, and cancer progression. This would augur for tight glucose control. Regrettably, some medical societies have recently relaxed hemoglobin A1c targets. A framework for the hyperglycemic state is presented that helps account and translate the full scope of effects of dysglycemia to ultimately improve clinical best practices.

A Unified Pathophysiological Construct of Diabetes and its Complications.

Advances in understanding diabetes mellitus (DM) through basic and clinical research have helped clarify and reunify a disease state fragmented into numerous etiologies and subtypes. It is now understood that a common pathophysiology drives the diabetic state throughout its natural history and across its varied clinical presentations, a pathophysiology involving metabolic insults, oxidative damage, and vicious cycles that aggravate and intensify organ dysfunction and damage. This new understanding of the disease requires that we revisit existing diagnostics and treatment approaches, which were built upon outmoded assumptions. 'The Common Pathophysiologic Origins of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications Construct' is presented as a more accurate, foundational, and translatable construct of DM that helps make sense of the hitherto ambiguous findings of long-term outcome studies.

Obviating much of the need for insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A re-assessment of insulin therapy's safety profile.

Current processes of care for diabetes mellitus (DM) were shaped during the era when insulin therapy was considered inexorable to the management of advanced stage type 2 (T2DM), though this no longer appears to be categorically true. There are also dashed hopes that insulin therapy can prevent or stall diabetes. While exogenous insulin remains a life-sparing tool for fully insulin-dependent DM, insulin therapy-induced hyperinsulinemia now appears to contribute to serious safety issues beyond hypoglycemia and weight gain. Iatrogenic and compensatory hyperinsulinemia are metabolic disruptors of ß-cells, liver, muscle, kidney, brain, heart and vasculature, inflammation, and lipid homeostasis, among other systems. This may compromise ß-cells, exacerbate insulin resistance (IR), and increase risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Striking associations between exogenous insulin and risks of CV events, cancer, and all-cause mortality in clinical trial and real-world cohorts caution that insulin may pose more harm than previously evidenced. At our disposal are numerous alternate tools that, alone or in combination, efficaciously manage hyperglycemia and glucolipotoxicity, and do so without inducing hypoglycemia, weight gain, or hyperinsulinemia. Moreover, these new tools support true precision therapy, as modern day drug classes can be aligned with the various mediating pathways of hyperglycemia at work in any given patient. Some also appear to promote ß-cell survival, with intriguing data being presented for newer agents, such as incretins. As such, we encourage preferential use of non-insulin antidiabetic agents to injected insulin for the management of non-insulin-dependent patients with T2DM, including in advanced stage T2DM. The goal of this article is to augment existing literature to 1) correct misconceptions on the rationale and necessity for insulin therapy in T2DM, 2) discuss emerging negative safety data with insulin therapy, and, 3) offer a practical means to reduce reliance on insulin through delayed initiation, minimized dose, and, drug switching to safer agents, and, potentially, reframes processes of care.