Global Ring Study to Investigate the Comparability of Total Assay Performance of Commercial Claudin 18 Antibodies for Evaluation in Gastric Cancer.

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), the dominant isoform of CLDN18 in gastric tissues, is a highly specific tight junction protein of the gastric mucosa with variably retained expressions in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Additionally, CLDN18.2-targeted treatment with zolbetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy, has recently been assessed in 2 phase-III studies of patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. These trials used the investigational VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A) RxDx immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay on the Ventana BenchMark platform to identify patients eligible for CLDN18.2-targeted treatment. We report the findings of a global ring study evaluating the analytical comparability of concordance of the results of 3 CLDN18 antibodies (Ventana, LSBio, and Novus) stained on 3 IHC-staining platforms (Ventana, Dako, and Leica). A tissue microarray (TMA), comprising 15 gastric cancer cases, was stained by 27 laboratories across 11 countries. Each laboratory stained the TMAs using at least 2 of the 3 evaluated CLDN18 antibodies. Stained TMAs were assessed and scored using an agreed IHC-scoring algorithm, and the results were collated for statistical analysis. The data confirmed a high level of concordance for the VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A; Ventana platform only) and LSBio antibodies on both the Dako and Leica platforms, with accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity rates all reaching a minimum acceptable ≥85% threshold and good-to-excellent levels of concordance as measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient. The Novus antibody showed the highest level of variability against the reference central laboratory results for the same antibody/platform combinations. It also failed to meet the threshold for accuracy and sensitivity when used on either the Dako or Leica platform. These results demonstrated the reliability of IHC testing for CLDN18 expression in gastric tumor samples when using commercially available platforms with an appropriate methodology and primary antibody selection.

Survival Outcomes in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), including both chemotherapy and chemoradiation, is utilized in other gastrointestinal malignancies. We determined survival in a contemporary cohort of gastric cancer patients treated with TNT. METHODS: Using a prospective institutional database, patients diagnosed with cT2-4 or cN+ gastric adenocarcinoma (January 2012 to June 2022) who underwent staging laparoscopy, received TNT, and underwent gastrectomy were identified. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: The study included 203 patients. The most common TNT sequence was induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (n = 186 [91.6%]). A total of 195 (96.1%) patients completed planned neoadjuvant treatments. Surgery included total gastrectomy in 108 (53.2%), extended (D1+/D2) lymphadenectomy in 193 (95.1%), and adjacent organ resection in 19 (9.4%) patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 32 (15.8%) patients. The 5-year OS rate was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.8-73.5%), and the 5-year DSS rate was 70.8% (95% CI 63.6-78.9%) in the study cohort. Among patients with pCR, the 5-year OS rate was 89.1% (95% CI 78.1-100.0%), and the 5-year DSS rate was 96.9% (95% CI 91-100%). Posttreatment pathologic N and M stages were the strongest prognostic indicators associated with both OS and DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Total neoadjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer is associated with a high rate of treatment completion and promising survival outcomes. Prospective comparisons with perioperative treatment are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from TNT.

Palliative Surgery for Patients with Gastroesophageal Junction or Gastric Cancer: A Report on Clinical Observational Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on palliative surgery in patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or gastric cancer. We sought to evaluate clinical observational outcomes following palliative surgery in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GEJ or gastric cancer who underwent palliative surgery (1/2010-11/2022) were identified. The primary outcomes were symptom improvement, ability to tolerate an oral diet, discharge to home, 30 "good days" without hospitalization, and receipt of systemic treatment. Postoperative outcomes and survival were secondarily evaluated. RESULTS: Among 93 patients, the median age was 59 (IQR 47-68) years, and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was 1 (range 0-3). The most frequent indication for palliative surgery was primary tumor obstruction [75 (81%) patients]. The most common procedures were feeding tube placement in 60 (65%) and intestinal bypass in 15 (16%) patients. A total of 75 (81%) patients experienced symptom improvement. Of these, 19 (25%) developed recurrent and 49 (65%) developed new symptoms. ECOG-PS was significantly associated with symptom-free time. Among those who underwent a bypass, resection, or ostomy creation for malignant obstruction, 16 (80%) tolerated an oral diet. Postoperatively, 87 (94%) were discharged home, 72 (77%) had 30 good days, and 64 (69%) received systemic treatment. Postoperative complications occurred in 35 (38%) patients, and 7 (8%) died within 30 days. The median survival time was 7.7 (95% CI 6.4-10.40) months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with incurable GEJ or gastric cancer can benefit from palliative surgery. Prognosis and performance status should inform goals-of-care discussions and patient selection for surgical palliation.

Immunotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the efficacy of combining them with each other for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ is unknown; therefore, we further evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. METHODS: The main search was conducted on published databases: Embase, Cochrane library, PubMed.The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to December 2023.Clinical trials with patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ and immunotherapy combined with apatinib as the study variable were collected. Review Manager 5.4 software as well as stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 651 patients from 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the included studies, immunotherapy combined with apatinib had a complete response (CR) of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00 -0.06), partial response (PR) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.19-0.49), stable disease (SD) of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), objective response rate (ORR) was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48), disease control rate (DCR) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.29 (95% CI: 4.05-4.52), median Overall survival (OS) was 8.79 (95% CI: 7.92-9.66), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 0.34 (95% CI: 0:19-0.49). PR, ORR, DCR, median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in the immunotherapy and apatinib combination chemotherapy group (IAC) than in the immunotherapy combination apatinib group (IA). And the difference was not significant in the incidence of SD and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that immunotherapy combined with apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic G/GEJ, where IAC can be a recommended adjuvant treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. However, more large multicenter randomized studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy combined with apatinib treatment.

Model-based population pharmacokinetic and exposure response analyses for safety and efficacy of nivolumab as adjuvant treatment in subjects with resected oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

AIMS: Nivolumab is approved as adjuvant treatment in subjects with resected oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) based on results from the pivotal CheckMate 577 trial. We present a model-based clinical pharmacology profiling and benefit-risk assessment of nivolumab as adjuvant treatment in subjects with resected EC/GEJC supporting a less frequent dosing regimen. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis was conducted to characterize nivolumab pharmacokinetics (PK) using clinical data from 1493 subjects from seven monotherapy clinical studies across multiple solid tumours. The exposure-response (E-R) analyses included data from 756 patients from CheckMate 577. E-R relationships for efficacy and safety were characterized by evaluating the relationship between nivolumab exposure and disease-free survival (DFS) for efficacy; and time to first occurrence of Grade ≥2 immune-mediated adverse events (Gr2 + IMAEs) for safety. RESULTS: Nivolumab exposure was found to be associated with both DFS and risk of Gr2 + IMAEs. However, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of nivolumab exposure were similar for DFS and Gr2 + IMAEs, indicating flat E-R relationships within the exposure range produced by the studied regimen. Model-predicted probability of DFS and Gr2 + IMAEs were similar between the two regimens of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks followed by 480 mg Q4W up to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses demonstrated a flat E-R relationship over the range of exposures produced by the studied regimen and supported the approval of an alternative dosing regimen with less frequent dosing in patients with adjuvant EC/GEJC.

Evolving Treatment Landscape for Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights advances and recent changes in the treatment paradigm for advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC). RECENT FINDINGS: Chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for advanced EAC/GEJAC. New targets/agents include immunotherapy, HER-2, claudin18.2, and FGFR2b, with various mechanisms (CAR-T, bispecific mAB, ADCs) altering the treatment landscape against these targets. The approaches to these targets may act together, in sequence, and even synergistically to improve outcomes. Herein, we review the state of the field, including highlighting ongoing clinical trials and additional emerging agents and approaches.

Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic stomach or gastroesophageal junction cancers: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of two articles. The first article is about a clinical trial called SPOTLIGHT and it was published in the medical journal The Lancet in in April of 2023. The second article is about a clinical trial called GLOW and it was published in the medical journal Nature Medicine in July of 2023. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Until recently, chemotherapy was the first treatment given to people with stomach cancer or gastroesophageal junction (or GEJ) cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. When cancer cells have high amounts of the protein CLDN18.2 but do not have high amounts of the protein HER2, the cancer is known as CLDN18.2-positive (or CLDN18.2+) and HER2-negative (or HER2-). New medicines to treat cancer are being developed. These medicines attach to proteins on cancer cells to help the body recognize and kill cancer cells.The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW included participants with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that was locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. These trials looked at whether adding a medicine called zolbetuximab to chemotherapy as the first treatment for cancer helped people live longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial. These studies also looked at whether adding zolbetuximab to chemotherapy helped people live longer after starting the trial. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, on average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 1.4 to 1.9 months longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. On average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy also lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. These results suggest that zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy could be a new first treatment for people with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03504397 (SPOTLIGHT); NCT03653507 (GLOW).

The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW showed that, on average, participants with stomach or GEJ cancer assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy.

A proactive financial navigation intervention in patients with newly diagnosed gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Many cancer patients and caregivers experience financial hardship, leading to poor outcomes. Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients are particularly at risk for financial hardship given the intensity of treatment. This pilot randomized study among gastric/GEJ cancer patients and caregivers tested a proactive financial navigation (FN) intervention to obtain a signal of efficacy to inform a larger, more rigorous randomized study. METHODS: We tested a 3-month proactive FN intervention among gastric/GEJ cancer patients and caregivers compared to usual care. Caregiver participation was optional. The primary endpoint was incidence of financial hardship, defined as follows: accrual of debt, income decline of ≥ 20%, or taking loans to pay for treatment. Data from participant surveys and documentation by partner organizations delivering the FN intervention was analyzed and outcomes were compared between study arms. RESULTS: Nineteen patients and 12 caregivers consented. Primary FN resources provided included insurance navigation, budget planning, and help with out-of-pocket medical expenses. Usual care patients were more likely to experience financial hardship (50% vs 40%) and declines in quality of life (37.5% vs 0%) compared to intervention patients. Caregivers in both arms reported increased financial stress and poorer quality of life over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive financial navigation has potentially positive impacts on financial hardship and quality of life for cancer patients and more large-scale randomized interventions should be conducted to rigorously explore the impact of similar interventions. Interventions that have the potential to lessen caregiver financial stress and burden need further exploration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TRN: NCT03986502, June 14, 2019.

Population Based Time Trends in the Epidemiology and Mortality of Gastroesophageal Junction and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC), particularly in comparison to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). With the advent of molecular non-endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) detection tests which sample the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, early detection of EAC and GEJAC has become a possibility and their epidemiology has gained importance. AIMS: We sought to evaluate time trends in the epidemiology and survival of patients with EAC and GEJAC in a population-based cohort. METHODS: EAC and GEJAC patients from 1976 to 2019 were identified using ICD 9 and 10 diagnostic codes from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Clinical data and survival status were abstracted. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR). Survival analysis and Cox proportional models were used to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: We included 443 patients (287 EAC,156 GEJAC). The incidence of EAC and GEJAC during 1976-2019 was 1.40 (CI 1.1-1.74) and 0.83 (CI 0.61-1.11) per 100,000 people, respectively. There was an increase in the incidence of EAC (IRR = 2.45, p = 0.011) and GEJAC (IRR = 3.17, p = 0.08) from 2000 to 2004 compared to 1995-1999, plateauing in later time periods. Most patients had associated BE and presented at advanced stages, leading to high 5-year mortality rates (66% in EAC and 59% in GEJAC). Age and stage at diagnosis were predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: The rising incidence of EAC/GEJAC appears to have plateaued somewhat in the last decade. However, both cancers present at advanced stages with persistently poor survival, underscoring the need for early detection.

Association of gastroesophageal junction laxity and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a prevalent condition with significant clinical variability, complicating its evaluation and treatment. The gastroesophageal flap valve is a fundamental evaluation method, but have shown limitations in specificity and reliance on subjective endoscopists' experience. Recent insights suggest that gastroesophageal junction laxity may offer an objective and quantifiable measurement for the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 401 patients who underwent comprehensive evaluations, including a symptom questionnaire, endoscopy, pH-impedance monitoring, high-resolution manometry, and treatment directions, between January 1, 2022 and October 31, 2023. Gastroesophageal junction laxity was assessed using a modified approach based on endoscopic image analysis, with the diameter of endoscope as reference to estimate the long diameter of the laxity ring. The independent association of gastroesophageal junction laxity with pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, and hiatal hernia were assessed by adjusting with age and sex. RESULTS: The mean age was 44.5 ± 5.5 years old, and 49.9% (200/401) were male. The most common symptoms (≥ 1 point) were acid regurgitation (333/401, 83.0%), heartburn (315/401, 78.6%), belching (278/401, 69.3%), bloating (241/401, 60.1%), and globus sensation (241/401, 60.1%). The gastroesophageal junction laxity was significantly associated with pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, hiatal hernia, and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure. Notably, with the increase in gastroesophageal junction laxity, the rates of pathologic acid exposure, esophagitis, and hiatal hernia increased gradually, the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure decreased gradually. The gastroesophageal junction laxity was independent associated with pathologic acid exposure (OR = 2.33, 95%CI 1.77-3.07, p < 0.001), esophagitis (OR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.62-2.73, p < 0.001), and hiatal hernia (high-resolution manometry: OR = 3.39, 95%CI: 2.46-4.67, p < 0.001) (endoscopy: OR = 21.65, 95%CI 11.70-40.06, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The gastroesophageal junction laxity was significantly associated with the indicators of pathophysiology in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab has been approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. However, the results of several clinical trials are not entirely consistent, and the dominant population of first-line immunotherapy for advanced GC/GEJ still needs to be precisely determined. PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced GC/GEJ. METHODS: We conducted computerized searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. We established the inclusion criteria to comprise randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of pembrolizumab in late-stage GC/GCJ cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of outcome measures using STATA 14.0 software. RESULTS: A total of six studies involving 1,448 cases were included in this analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that, when compared to chemotherapy, patients in the pembrolizumab group experienced a significant reduction in the risk of mortality in terms of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.79, p < 0.01). In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), pembrolizumab was associated with a similar PFS as compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73-1.07, p = 0.206). Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 expression levels indicated a significantly longer PFS with pembrolizumab in subgroups of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 but not in those with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and PD-L1 CPS ≥5. Subgroup analyses based on distinct geographical regions revealed a comparable effect of PFS in patients residing in Asia or the USA Subgroup analysis based on tumor sites consistently demonstrated a similar effect of PFS in patients with EC/GEJ tumors and GC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that pembrolizumab led to a significant extension in OS and objective response rate, along with a favorable tolerability profile compared to chemotherapy. Furthermore, the observed survival benefits were particularly pronounced in subgroup patients with a CPS of ≥10. Given the potential limitations inherent in our study, it is imperative to underscore the necessity for further large-scale RCTs to corroborate our results.

New therapeutic target molecules for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Molecularly targeted therapy for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has faced limitations in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer except for HER2-targeted agents, possibly due to inappropriate assay selection that has hindered identification of sensitive patients, in addition to coexisting genetic abnormalities as well as intratumoral heterogeneity. Immunohistochemistry of RTKs has, thus, proved largely unsuccessful for patient selection, and detection of RTK gene amplification as a true oncogenic driver is problematic given the small numbers of affected individuals. FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in G/GEJ cancer, and immunohistochemistry of the FGFR2b protein isoform has proved effective for the detection of such FGFR2-dependent tumors. Phase III and Ib/III trials of the FGFR2-targeted antibody bemarituzumab for G/GEJ cancer overexpressing FGFR2b are ongoing based on the promising result in a phase II trial, especially in cases with an FGFR2b positivity of ≥ 10%. Challenges to EGFR- and MET-targeted therapies are being tackled with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies. CLDN18.2 is expressed in some G/GEJ tumors but lacks oncogenic driver potential, and the CLDN18.2-targeted antibody zolbetuximab prolonged the survival of CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ cancer patients in phase III trials. Antibody-drug conjugates and ADCs that target CLDN18.2 are also being pursued for treatment of such patients. Similarly, targeting of nondriver molecules such as DKK1, TROP2, and CEACAM5 is under investigation in early-stage clinical trials. This shift in focus from target molecules with driver potential to markers for precise drug delivery should increase the number of possible targets in G/GEJ cancer.

Contemporary outcomes of left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, a multicenter cohort study.

Surgery for cancer of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction can be performed with a variety of minimally invasive and open approaches. The left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) is an open technique that gives an opportunity to operate in the chest and abdomen with excellent exposure of the gastro-esophageal junction through a single incision, and there is currently no equivalent minimally invasive technique available. The aim of this multi-institutional review was to study a large contemporary international study cohort of patients treated with LTE. An international multicenter cohort study was performed including all patients treated with LTE at six high-volume centers for gastro-esophageal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2022. Patient data were prospectively collected in each participating centers' institutional database. Information about patient, tumor, and treatment details were collected. The study cohort included a total of 793 patients treated with LTE during the study period. The most frequently observed complications were pneumonia in 185/727 (25.5%) patients and atrial fibrillation in 91/727 (12.5%). Anastomotic leak occurred in 35/727 (4.8%) patients; no patient suffered from conduit necrosis. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 15/785 (1.9%) patients and 90-day mortality in 39/785 (5.0%) patients. Factors with statistically significant association with survival were American Society for Anesthesiologists-score, tumor location, tumor stage, and tumor free resection margins. Neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with increased survival compared to surgery alone but neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed statistically significant improved survival with hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence intervals:0.44-0.80, P = 0.001) in a multivariable adjusted model. This study demonstrates that LTE can be applied in selected patients with results that are comparable to other large studies of open and minimally invasive surgery for esophageal or gastro-esophageal cancer at high-volume centers.

Primary malignant melanoma of the gastroesophageal junction with KIT gene exon 11 mutation.

Mucosal melanoma (MM) represents an uncommon form of melanoma. Primary gastrointestinal tract (GIT) melanoma is even rarer. A 70-year-old male visited the Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, China, due to upper abdominal discomfort for the past two months. His endoscopy revealed a prominent, 6-cm ulcerated neoplasm in the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Lesion endoscopic biopsy showed diffusely distributed tumour cells. He underwent subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection (LND). Postoperative histopathology revealed a diffuse distribution of tumour cells with numerous tumourinfiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and pigment granules. Immunohistochemical (IHC) results were positive for both S-100 and HMB-45. Molecular analysis showed KIT gene exon 11 mutations. Although the clinicians emphasised the necessity of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy with the patient and his family, the patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy and died 36 months after surgery. Primary malignant melanoma of GEJ should be considered in a differential diagnosis for gastrointestinal malignancies, especially after excluding the source of metastasis through a systemic examination.

Effectiveness of prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review.

Progression of the physical weakness during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer is a serious problem; however, prehabilitation during NAT has the potential to overcome the unmet need. Nevertheless, systematic reviews on this topic have not been summarized. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to determine prehabilitation's effectiveness, acceptability, and safety during NAT for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PEDro databases. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of prehabilitation during NAT, along with a descriptive analysis of acceptance and safety. This study analyzed data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-RCTs involving 664 patients. The meta-analysis of two RCTs demonstrated that prehabilitation during NAT may be more effective than usual care in enhancing tolerance to NAT and grip strength; moreover, one RCT and three non-RCTs revealed that prehabilitation may reduce the risk of postoperative complications. The adherence rates for exercise programs in two RCTs and seven non-RCTs were 55-76%. Additionally, two studies reported a 76% adherence rate for multimodal prehabilitation programs, including exercise, dietary, and psychological care. Six studies reported no serious prehabilitation-related adverse events during NAT. Prehabilitation during NAT may be a safe and beneficial intervention strategy for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, the investigation of strategies to enhance adherence is essential. Furthermore, additional high-quality RCTs are needed to examine the effect of prehabilitation during NAT.

Paclitaxel With or Without Cixutumumab as Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Randomized Phase II ECOG-ACRIN Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer carry poor prognoses; limited data exist to guide second-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Paclitaxel has been used yet is associated with limited efficacy. There is preclinical evidence of synergy between paclitaxel and cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel (arm A) versus paclitaxel plus cixutumumab (arm B) in the second-line for patients with metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. METHODS: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); 87 patients (43 in arm A, 44 in arm B) were treated. RESULTS: Median PFS was 2.6 months in arm A [90% CL 1.8-3.5] and 2.3 months in arm B [90% 2.0-3.5], P = .86. Stable disease was observed in 29 (33%) patients. Objective response rates for Arms A and B were 12% [90% CI, 5-23%] and 14% [90% CI, 6-25%]. Median overall survival was 6.7 months [90% CL 4.9-9.5] in arm A and 7.2 months [90% CL 4.9-8.1] in arm B, P = 56. CONCLUSION: The addition of cixutumumab to paclitaxel in second-line therapy of metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancer was well tolerated but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to standard of care (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01142388).

High Interobserver Variability Among Pathologists Using Combined Positive Score to Evaluate PD-L1 Expression in Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Reliable, reproducible methods to interpret programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC) are needed for pathologists to inform decisions associated with checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Our international study compared interpathologist agreement of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS) under standardized conditions on samples from patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal adenocarcinoma. Tissue sections from 100 adenocarcinoma pretreatment biopsies were stained in a single laboratory using the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 28-8 and 22C3 (Agilent) pharmDx immunohistochemical assays. PD-L1 CPS was evaluated by 12 pathologists on scanned whole slide images of these biopsies before and after a 2-hour CPS training session by Agilent. Additionally, pathologists determined PD-L1-positive TC, IC, and total viable TC on a single tissue fragment from 35 of 100 biopsy samples. Scoring agreement among pathologists was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interobserver variability for CPS for 100 biopsies was high, with only fair agreement among pathologists both pre- (range, 0.45-0.55) and posttraining (range, 0.56-0.57) for both assays. For the 35 single biopsy samples, poor/fair agreement was also observed for the total number of viable TC (ICC, 0.09), number of PD-L1-positive IC (ICC, 0.19), number of PD-L1-positive TC (ICC, 0.54), and calculated CPS (ICC, 0.14), whereas calculated TC score (positive TC/total TC) showed excellent agreement (ICC, 0.82). Retrospective histologic review of samples with the poorest interpathologist agreement revealed the following as possible confounding factors: (1) ambiguous identification of positively staining stromal cells, (2) faint or variable intensity of staining, (3) difficulty in distinguishing membranous from cytoplasmic tumor staining, and (4) cautery and crush artifacts. These results emphasize the need for objective techniques to standardize the interpretation of PD-L1 expression when using the CPS methodology on gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer biopsies to accurately identify patients most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer based on clinical characteristics: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have been reported in several clinical trials for gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). We presently carried out a meta analysis to evaluate the potency of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced GC/GEJC individuals with different clinical features and to determine patients more probably benefiting from the treatment. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in databases that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy in patients with GC/GEJC published before May 2022 were retrieved. Basic characteristics were extracted from the included studies as well as hazard ratios (HR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) for all individuals and subgroups. The inverse variance weighting method was used to evaluate pooled treatment data. FINDINGS: Four RCTs involving 2,253 individuals were included. The results suggested that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors substantially enhanced overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.91; CI 95%, 0.83-1.00; p = 0.04) but not progression free survival (PFS) (HR, 1.17; CI 95%, 0.83-1.64; p = 0.38) in GC/GEJC individuals compared with chemotherapy. Significantly improved OS was observed in individuals aged < 65 years (HR, 0.84; p = 0.003), and men (HR, 0.88; p = 0.02), but not in individuals aged ≥ 65 years (HR, 0.97; p = 0.62), and women (HR, 0.98; p = 0.82). IMPLICATIONS: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors improve OS but not PFS compared with chemotherapy in GC/GEJC. Age and sex could be used to predict the treatment potency of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in GC/GEJC.

Global retrospective analysis of clinician- and patient-reported clinical characteristics and humanistic burden of patients with gastroesophageal cancers on first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC), gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), together, are leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and well-being has become increasingly important alongside traditional oncologic outcomes for both patients and clinicians and may aid treatment decisions. We conducted a survey to examine the clinical characteristics, humanistic burden, and the effects of first-line (1L) treatment in patients with GC/GEJC/EAC, across different geographic regions, to address the paucity of real-world data. METHODS: Clinicians treating patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC in China, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, during April-October 2019, were invited to provide data on their patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and HRQoL via medical chart reviews, clinician surveys, and patient questionnaires. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression analyses comparing active treatment and best supportive care. Patients were also stratified into subgroups that were identified either as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive, HER2 negative (which has a higher prevalence but for whom there are limited treatment options), or unknown HER2 status. RESULTS: Survey data were analyzed for 995 patients, 87% of whom were on active treatment, most commonly dual or triple chemotherapy. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar across countries with most patients having GC and the lowest incidence of GEJC and EAC in China. Overall, most patients had de novo disease with good response to 1L treatment, while their HRQoL and well-being was significantly worse than the general population. In 682 patients on active treatment with HER2 negative or unknown status, HRQoL also appeared to be worse in those with recurrent disease. Regression analysis identified several drivers of treatment decisions and factors impacting patients' HRQoL, including stage of disease and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC, screening and assessment of HER2 status as well as patient-reported HRQoL outcomes are invaluable in aiding treatment decisions. The introduction of appropriate therapy soon after diagnosis has the prospect of achieving improved HRQoL and survival in these patients.

Robotic Function-Preserving Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) located at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), lesser curvature, posterior gastric wall, or antrum present challenges for gastric function preservation. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted resection of gastric GIST in challenging anatomic locations. METHODS: This was a single-center case series of robotic gastric GIST resections in challenging anatomic locations performed from 2019 to 2021. GEJ GISTs are defined as tumors within 5 cm of the GEJ. Location of the tumor and distance from the GEJ were determined from the endoscopy report and/or cross-sectional imaging and operative findings. RESULTS: There were 25 consecutive patients who underwent a robot-assisted partial gastrectomy for a gastric GIST in challenging anatomic locations. Tumors were located at the GEJ (n = 12), lesser curvature (n = 7), posterior gastric wall (n = 4), fundus (n = 3), greater curvature (n = 3), and antrum (n = 2). Median distance of tumor from GEJ was 2.5 cm. Both GEJ and pylorus were successfully preserved in all patients regardless of tumor location. Median operative time was 190 min with a median estimated blood loss of 20 mL and no conversion to open approach. Median hospital stay was 3 d with solid diet intake starting 2 d after surgery. Two (8 %) patients had Grade III or higher postoperative complications. Median tumor size upon resection was 3.9 cm. Negative margins were obtained in 96.3%. There was no evidence of recurrent disease with a median follow-up of 11.3 mo. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of using the robotic approach to facilitate function preservation gastrectomy in challenging anatomic locations without compromising oncologic resection.