Glofitamab as a salvage treatment for B-cell lymphomas in the real world: A multicenter study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody with promise for treating relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma according to a phase 1/2 clinical trial. This study examined its real-world effectiveness. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, multicenter retrospective study including 34 patients who had relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas after at least three prior lines of therapy and received glofitamab monotherapy in a compassionate use program in Taiwan between January 2021 and October 2022. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15.9 months, 56% of patients responded to glofitamab and 23% achieved complete remission. Response to the previous line of therapy significantly correlated with response to glofitamab (p = .020). Most responses were durable; only five out of the 19 responders had documented disease recurrence at the data cutoff date. The estimated progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS was 33% for the entire cohort. PFS was better for responders than nonresponders (median PFS, 16.9 vs. 1.8 months; 1-year PFS, 60% vs. 0%). Forty-three cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events were observed, three of which were grade 3; all were manageable without glofitamab discontinuation. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity was reported. Among seven hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (six had antiviral prophylaxis) and 14 patients with remote HBV (four had antiviral prophylaxis), no HBV reactivation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, glofitamab exhibited effectiveness comparable to trial results without excessive CRS or new safety issues. With appropriate prophylaxis, glofitamab-treated patients with chronic or remote HBV infection are unlikely to experience virus reactivation.

Allogeneic transplantation after immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparison with a historical cohort.

BACKGROUND AIMS: New immunotherapy drugs, such as bispecific T-cell engager antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, are commonly used as salvage therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma relapsing after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Nevertheless, their potential long-term effects on the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) are not well known. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 27 relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients receiving Allo-SCT after immunotherapy in the pre-CAR T-cell therapy era and compared them with a historical cohort of 28 subjects undergoing Allo-SCT after conventional therapy. RESULTS: The two cohorts had similar outcomes in terms of graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival (4 years, 59% versus 46%), overall survival (4 years, 77% versus 44%), non-relapse mortality (4 years, 19% versus 22%) and acute (6 months, 15% versus 21%) and chronic (4 years, 18% versus 24%) graft-versus-host disease. Of note, the cumulative incidence of relapse was lower after immunotherapy (4 years, 4% versus 14%), although significance was not reached. The cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus and fungal infection did not differ among the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation with Allo-SCT is a safe and curative option for patients achieving disease response after new immunotherapy drugs that could represent a desirable salvage strategy for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy.

Practice efficiency and total cost of care with bispecifics and CAR-T in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an institutional perspective.

Aim: Novel treatment options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma include T-cell targeting therapies. Practice efficiency and cost are important for informed treatment decisions.Materials/methods: An institutional decision-maker cost model was developed for 6-month, 1-year and median cycles of treatment time horizons comparing practice efficiency and costs of epcoritamab vs glofitamab and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel).Results: Overall, epcoritamab required the shortest personnel and chair time, except over 1 year (second shortest chair time). Across all time horizons, epcoritamab was cost-saving vs axi-cel and had similar costs to glofitamab on a per-month basis.Conclusion: Epcoritamab reduced personnel and chair time. Additionally, epcoritamab was cost-saving vs axi-cel and had similar costs to glofitamab on a per-month basis.

There are new ways to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which is a type of cancer called lymphoma. When new treatments are available it is important to see if they take more or less time to give to patients and how much they cost versus other treatments. This study looked at three drugs used to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including epcoritamab, axi-cel and glofitamab. It estimated the time and cost with those treatments in patients who get them for 6 months, 1 year or for the most common length of time in the clinical trials. In most of the scenarios, epcoritamab had the least time needed for nurses or doctors and the least time needed for a patient to be in a chair in a clinic. When thinking about the cost per month, epcoritamab saved money versus axi-cel and was similar to glofitamab.

Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific Antibodies in Adults with Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trial Data.

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are an emerging therapy in the treatment of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). There is a gap in the research on the safety and efficacy of bsAbs in adults with LBCL, with current research focusing on the wider non-Hodgkin's lymphoma population. To address this research gap, we conducted a systematic review aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of bsAbs in adults with LBCL. A systematized search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 10 April 2024. Interventional clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. Observational studies, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. According to the Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies, the included studies were largely of a high quality for safety outcome reporting, but of mixed quality for efficacy outcome reporting. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the results were discussed as a narrative synthesis. Nineteen early phase studies were evaluated in the final analysis, with a pooled sample size of 1332 patients. Nine bsAbs were investigated across the studies as monotherapy (nine studies) or in combination regimes (10 studies). The rates of cytokine release syndrome were variable, with any grade events ranging from 0 to 72.2%. Infection rates were consistently high across the reporting studies (38-60%). Cytopenias were found to be common, in particular, anemia (4.4-62%), thrombocytopenia (3.3-69%), and neutropenia (4.4-70%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade ≥3 adverse events were not commonly reported. Promising efficacy outcomes were reported, with median overall response rates of 95-100% in the front-line and 36-91% in terms of relapsed/refractory disease. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that bsAbs are generally well-tolerated and effective in adults with LBCL. BsAbs appear to have superior tolerability, but inferior efficacy to CAR T-cell therapies in adults with LBCL. Future research on safety and efficacy should focus on evaluating adverse event timing and management, the impact on the patient's quality of life, the burden on the healthcare system, and overall survival outcomes.

Glofitamab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Real-world data.

Glofitamab is a CD3xCD20 bi-specific antibody with two fragments directed to the CD20 antigen and a single CD3-binding fragment. Encouraging response and survival rates were recently reported in a pivotal phase II expansion trial conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. However, the real-world data of patients of all ages with no strict selection criteria are still lacking. Herein, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who received glofitamab via compassionate use in Turkey. Forty-three patients from 20 centers who received at least one dose of the treatment were included in this study. The median age was 54 years. The median number of previous therapies was 4, and 23 patients were refractory to first-line treatment. Twenty patients had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. The median follow-up time was 5.7 months. In efficacy-evaluable patients, 21% and 16% of them achieved complete response and partial response, respectively. The median response duration was 6.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.3 and 8.8 months, respectively. None of the treatment-responsive patients progressed during the study period, and their estimated 1-year PFS and OS rate was 83%. The most frequently reported toxicity was hematological toxicity. Sixteen patients survived, while 27 died at the time of the analysis. The most common cause of death was disease progression. One patient died of cytokine release syndrome during the first cycle after receiving the first dose of glofitamab. Meanwhile, two patients died due to glofitamab-related febrile neutropenia. This is the largest real-world study on the effectiveness and toxicity of glofitamab treatment in R/R DLBCL patients. The median OS of 9 months seems promising in this heavily pretreated group. The toxicity related mortality rates were the primary concerns in this study.

Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of lymphomas: Promises and challenges.

The potential of bispecific antibodies to direct antigen-specific T cell-mediated cytotoxicity toward malignant cells bearing a target antigen was recognized over 35 years ago. Generally, this is accomplished by combining a T-cell receptor-specific monoclonal antibody or monoclonal antibody-derived fragment that is capable of activating and expanding resting T cells with a second monoclonal antibody or monoclonal antibody fragment directed against a tumor target antigen. Bispecific antibodies induce effector T cells that bind to tumor cells independently of their T-cell receptor specificity and without the requirement of MHC-mediated antigen presentation, focusing effector T-cell cytotoxicity on tumor cells bearing the target antigen. The therapeutic efficacy of this approach for treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas was first demonstrated with blinatumomab, a single molecule comprised of two linked single-chain variable fragments with binding specificities for CD19 and CD3. The recent demonstration that chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells can achieve very durable remissions in some patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas, as well as the potential efficacy of bispecific antibodies in CAR T cell failures, has rekindled interested in bispecific antibodies as a T cell-mediated therapeutic approach. We review the early results of phase 1 clinical trials of bispecific antibodies targeting CD20 on B cells and engaging T cells via CD3 in 1:1 or 2:1 CD20:CD3 Fab formats for treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas.

Promising Immunotherapeutic Modalities for B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Over the last few years, treatment principles have been changed towards more targeted therapy for many B-cell lymphoma subtypes and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Immunotherapeutic modalities, namely monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, commonly use B-cell-associated antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD79b) as one of their targets. T-cell engagers (TCEs), a subclass of bsAbs, work on a similar mechanism as CAR-T cell therapy without the need of previous T-cell manipulation. Currently, several anti-CD20xCD3 TCEs have demonstrated promising efficacy across different lymphoma subtypes with slightly better outcomes in the indolent subset. Anti-CD19xCD3 TCEs are being developed as well but only blinatumomab has been evaluated in clinical trials yet. The results are not so impressive as those with anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting different B-cell antigens (CD30, CD79b, CD19) seem to be effective in combination with mAbs, standard chemoimmunotherapy, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further investigation will show whether immunotherapy alone or in combinatory regimens has potential to replace chemotherapeutic agents from the first line treatment.

Trial watch: bispecific antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Immunotherapy has shaped the treatment approach to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with rituximab leading to remarkable improvements in outcomes for both relapsed and treatment-naïve patients. Recently, groundbreaking immunotherapies like chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have entered the treatment arena for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and gained regulatory approval in several countries. The concept of harnessing a patient's own T-cells to combat cancer has been further explored through the development of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), a class of engineered antibody products designed to simultaneously target two different antigens. These novel drugs have demonstrated impressive single-agent activity and manageable toxicity in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of recently completed or ongoing BsAbs trials in patients with R/R DLBCL, including single-agent results, emerging combination data, and novel constructs.

Bispecific antibodies in the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: The management of relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has witnessed dramatic changes in the recent past. Despite the availability of multiple novel immunotherapies in R/R setting, there remains an unmet need for off-the-shelf therapies, particularly in patients with primary refractory, multiply relapsed disease or those experiencing cellular immunotherapy failure. To harness the power of the T-cell mediated immunity, a novel class of drugs called bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have been developed. These BsAbs are currently under investigation both in frontline and R/R setting and hold the potential to revolutionize the management of LBCL. AREAS COVERED: This review article summarizes the currently available BsAbs, their mode of action, efficacy, and safety data for untreated and R/R LBCL. In addition, the role of these BsAbs in combination with currently available chemoimmunotherapy regimens is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Two BsAbs have secured FDA approval for R/R LBCL, with expected approval of more BsAbs (including in earlier treatment lines). These drugs provide a highly efficacious and relatively safe treatment option for patients with highly pretreated disease including relapse after cellular immunotherapies. In addition, these BsAbs provide a platform for chemotherapy-free regimen for older/frail patients.

The value of bispecific antibodies in relapsed and refractory DLBCL.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be cured with anti-CD20 based chemoimmunotherapy in the majority of cases, however, relapsed/refractory disease occurs in 30-40% patients, and despite significant recent therapeutic advances, continues to represent an unmet clinical need. Bispecific antibodies represent a novel class of therapy currently in development for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. This review discusses the background clinical need, mechanism of action, and clinical data including efficacy and toxicity for bispecific antibodies in DLBCL, focusing on the most advanced class in development; CD20 targeting T-cell engaging antibodies. Emerging possibilities for future use of bispecific antibodies is also discussed, including novel and cytotoxic combination regimens in relapsed and first-line settings.

The Evolving Role of Bispecific Antibodies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

The advent of targeted therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, adoptive T-cell therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) dramatically changed the treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) over the last two decades. Rituximab was the first one approved. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells are currently approved as second-line treatment in patients with DLBCL refractory to first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Polatuzumab, a CD79b-targeting ADC, is approved as first-line treatment in high-risk patients in combination with chemo-immunotherapy. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are a novel category of drugs that are also changing the treatment paradigm of patients with DLBCL. They are engineered to bind to two different targets at the same time. To date, two BsAbs (glofitamab and epcoritamab) are approved as monotherapy in third-line treatment in DLBCL. Combination strategies with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and ADCs are currently under investigation with encouraging results in first-line or subsequent lines of treatment. In the following review, we focus on the structure of BsAbs, the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and the mechanisms of resistance to BsAbs.

An evaluation of glofitamab, the first fixed-duration bispecific antibody for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas.

INTRODUCTION: Significant proportion of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is refractory or relapse (R/R) after the treatment. The prognosis of this patient cohort remains poor. Novel strategies mainly based on immunotherapy and targeted agents are currently being studied. Glofitamab is novel T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody possessing a 2:1 structure with bivalent CD20 binding. Its safety and efficacy in R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma including DLBCL were evaluated in phase I-II NP30179 trial. AREAS COVERED: The article summarizes the milestones and latest reports on glofitamab development in the field of B-cell lymphoma treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Recently, phase II part of the NP30179 study and several other reports were published proving glofitamab potential in R/R DLBCL patients. Based on the published data, glofitamab was approved by regulatory authorities worldwide for the monotherapy of R/R DLBCL in conventional time-limited manner. It is readily accessible in case of rapidly progressing disease, and it compares well with other novel treatment options. Its side effects are similar to those of other T-cell-engaging agents and can be mitigated by pretreatment with obinutuzumab or step-up dosing. Its safety profile with manageable toxicities heads the clinical development toward combination strategies and its use in earlier therapeutic phases.

Experiences with Glofitamab Administration following CAR T Therapy in Patients with Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare type of B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) affecting predominantly male patients. While complete remissions following first-line treatment are frequent, most patients ultimately relapse, with a usually aggressive further disease course. The use of cytarabine-comprising induction chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, Rituximab maintenance, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and CAR T therapy has substantially improved survival. Still, options for patients relapsing after CAR T therapy are limited and recommendations for the treatment of these patients are lacking. We report two cases of patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed after CAR T therapy and were treated with the bispecific CD20/CD3 T cell engaging antibody glofitamab. Both patients showed marked increases of circulating CAR T cells and objective responses after glofitamab administration. Therapy was tolerated without relevant side effects in both patients. One patient completed all 12 planned cycles of glofitamab therapy and was alive and without clinical progression at the last follow-up. The second patient declined further treatment after the first cycle and succumbed to disease progression. We review the literature and investigate possible mechanisms involved in the observed responses after administration of glofitamab, such as proliferation of CAR T cells, anti-tumor effects of the bispecific antibody and the role of other possibly contributing factors. Therapy with bispecific antibodies might offer an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with mantle cell lymphoma relapsing after CAR T therapy.

Glofitamab Treatment in Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL after CAR T-Cell Therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T) treatment has become a standard option for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), which are refractory or relapse after two prior lines of therapy. However, little evidence exists for treatment recommendations in patients who relapse after CAR T-cell treatment and the outcome for such patients is poor. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a monotherapy with the bispecific CD20xCD3 antibody glofitamab in patients who progressed after CAR T treatment. We report nine consecutive patients with progressive DLBCL after preceding CAR T-cell therapy. The patients received a maximum of 12 cycles of glofitamab after a single obinutuzumab pre-treatment at an academic institution. CRS was observed in two patients (grade 2 in both patients). We observed an overall response rate of 67%, with four patients achieving a complete response and a partial remission in two patients. Interestingly, we identified increased persistence of circulating CAR T-cells in peripheral blood in three of the five patients with measurable CAR T-cells. Our data suggest that glofitamab treatment is well tolerated and effective in patients with DLBCL relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy and can enhance residual CAR T-cell activity.

Treatments for Relapsed-Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Preliminary Evaluation of the Place in Therapy of Glofitamab, a Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody.

Background and objectives Glofitamab, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, polatuzumab, and selinexor have been proposed for the treatment of relapsed-refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We studied the pattern of overall survival (OS) for these five agents. Methods We reconstructed patient-level data from the Kaplan-Meier OS graphs published in five pivotal trials. For this purpose, we used an artificial intelligence technique (the Shiny method). Reconstructed survival curves were subjected to standard statistics to perform cross-trial indirect comparisons; medians and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for each treatment. Results Using glofitamab (a bispecific antibody) as a common comparator, our analysis of OS yielded the following results: a) tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, HR: 0.514 (95% CI: 0.341 to 0.776; P=0.0015); b) polatuzumab vedotin, HR: 0.822 (95% CI: 0.509 to 1.327); c) selinexor, HR: 1.170 (95% CI: 0.852 to 1.603); and d) loncastuximab tesirine, HR: 1.120 (95% CI: 0.868 to 1.659). Medians were estimated as follows: a) tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, 26.5 months (95% CI: 18.9 to NA); b) polatuzumab vedotin, 12.5 months (95% CI: 9.03 to NA); c) glofitamab, 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.96 to 18.0); d) loncastuximab tesirine, 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.97 to 11.6); and e) selinexor, 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.72 to 14.2). Conclusions These comparative results represent an original finding generated by the Shiny method. Although these comparisons are indirect, our analysis offers a useful synthesis of the outcomes of these treatments. According to these results, glofitamab, despite its improved mechanism of action, does not seem to confer any OS advantage compared with the other four treatments.

Glofitamab CD20-TCB bispecific antibody.

Bispecific T-cell recruiting antibodies are emerging as a potent immunotherapeutic class in the treatment of B-cell malignancies and act by simultaneously targeting antigens on T-cells and malignant cells to effect tumor cell death. Glofitamab is a novel full-length IgG-like CD20-CD3 bispecific with a unique 2:1 configuration that provides an extended half-life and superior CD20 binding. Phase 1 monotherapy and combination data demonstrate clear activity in heavily treated aggressive and indolent B-cell lymphoma, including >50% complete responses at the recommended phase 2 dose. In this review, we provide an overview of the structure, mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of glofitamab. Available efficacy and safety data from ongoing clinical trials are also presented. Glofitamab appears to be a welcome addition to the treatment possibilities for patients with B-cell lymphomas who otherwise have limited therapeutic options. The current data are sufficient to evaluate its role in combination and in earlier lines of therapy.