Prolonged haematologic toxicity in CAR-T-cell therapy: A review.

Chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy is a novel immunotherapy with encouraging results for treatment of relapsed/refractory haematologic malignancies. With increasing use, our understanding of immune-mediated side effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity has improved; nevertheless, prolonged haematologic toxicity (PHT), with a high incidence rate, remains underrecognized. Owing to heterogeneity in populations, the CAR-T cells used and diseases treated as well as differences in the definition of PHT, its rate, risk factors and management vary across studies. In this review, we provide a narrative of PHT occurring in patients following CAR-T-cell therapy; evidence of PHT treatment strategies is also presented, with the aim of contributing to systematic understanding of PHT.

Haematologic toxicities with PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: an up-to-date meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as one of the most exciting new treatments for patients with certain types of cancer. Haematologic toxicities are common adverse events (AEs) for all PARP inhibitors. We conducted a meta-analysis to fully investigate the haematologic toxicities of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed/Medline and Embase were searched for articles published till September 2020. The relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors were retrieved, and the systematic evaluation was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs and 9247 patients were included. The current meta-analysis suggests that the use of PARP inhibitors significantly increases the risk of all-grade anaemia (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.78-3.01; p < 0.00001), neutropenia (RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.38-2.07; p < 0.00001) and thrombocytopenia (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.87-3.45; p < 0.00001). The use of these agents also significantly increased the risk of high-grade anaemia (RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.11-4.43; p < 0.00001), neutropenia (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.33-2.07; p < 0.00001) and thrombocytopenia (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.83-4.16; p < 0.00001). Anaemia was the most common haematologic toxicity, and all the five included PARP inhibitors were associated with a significant increased risk of anaemia. Combination treatment may reduce the risk of anaemia and thrombocytopenia compared to those receiving PARP inhibitor monotherapy. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The available data suggested that the use of PARP inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of haematologic toxicities.

Virologic response and haematologic toxicity of boceprevir- and telaprevir-containing regimens in actual clinical settings.

Effectiveness, safety and tolerability of boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TPV) in actual clinical settings remain unknown. We determined rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) and haematologic adverse effects among persons treated with BOC- or TPV-containing regimens, compared with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG/RBV). Using an established cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons, Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES), we identified those treated with a BOC- or TPV-containing regimen and HCV genotype 1-infected controls treated with PEG/RBV. We excluded those with HIV coinfection and missing HCV RNA values to determine SVR. Primary endpoints were SVR (undetectable HCV RNA ≥12 weeks after treatment completion) and haematologic toxicity (grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia). We evaluated 2288 persons on BOC-, 409 on TPV-containing regimen and 6308 on PEG/RBV. Among these groups, respectively, 31%, 43% and 9% were treatment-experienced; 17%, 37% and 14% had baseline cirrhosis; 63%, 54% and 48% were genotype 1a. SVR rates among noncirrhotics were as follows: treatment naïve: 65% (BOC), 67% (TPV) and 31% (PEG/RBV); treatment experienced: 57% (BOC), 54% (TPV) and 13% (PEG/RBV); (P-value not significant for BOC vs TPV; P < 0.0001 for BOC or TPV vs PEG/RBV). Haematologic toxicities among BOC-, TPV- and PEG/RBV-treated groups were as follows: grade 3/4 anaemia 7%, 11% and 3%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia 2.2%, 5.4% and 1.7%; grade 4 neutropenia 8.2%, 5.6% and 3.4%. SVR rates are higher and closer to those reported in pivotal clinical trials among BOC- and TPV-treated persons compared with PEG/RBV-treated persons. Haematologic adverse events are frequent, but severe toxicity is uncommon.

Clinical outcomes of pelvic bone marrow sparing radiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. We investigated how additional bone marrow sparing (BMS) affects the clinical outcomes. Methods: We queried MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, Sinomed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for articles published in English or Chinese between 2010/01/01 and 2023/10/31. Full-text manuscripts of prospective, randomised trials on BMS in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive or postoperative CRT were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's RoB tool. Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 17 trials encompassing 1297 patients were included. The majority were single-centre trials (n = 1268) performed in China (n = 1128). Most trials used CT-based anatomical BMS (n = 1076). There was a comparable representation of trials in the definitive (n = 655) and postoperative (n = 582) settings, and the remaining trials included both.Twelve studies reported data on G ≥ 3 (n = 782) and G ≥ 2 (n = 754) haematologic adverse events. Both G ≥ 3 (OR 0.39; 95 % CI 0.28-0.55; p < 0.001) and G ≥ 2 (OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.18-0.46; p < 0.001) toxicity were significantly lowered, favouring BMS. Seven studies (n = 635) reported data on chemotherapy interruptions, defined as receiving less than five cycles of cisplatin, which were significantly less frequent in patients treated with BMS (OR 0.44; 95 % CI 0.24-0.81; p = 0.016). There was no evidence of increased gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.There were no signs of significant heterogeneity. Four studies were assessed as high RoB; sensitivity analyses excluding these provided comparable results for main outcomes. The main limitations include heterogeneity in BMS methodology between studies, low representation of populations most affected by cervical cancer, and insufficient data to assess survival outcomes. Conclusions: The addition of BMS to definitive CRT in cervical cancer patients decreases hematologic toxicity and the frequency of interruptions in concurrent chemotherapy. However, data are insufficient to verify the impact on survival and disease control.

Treatment with low-dose tyrosine kinase inhibitors due to significant haematologic toxicity in patients with CML with prolonged treatment failure prevents haematologic progression.

BACKGROUND: A lower dosage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has shown efficacy in managing short-term toxicity and maintaining a deep molecular response in patients who fail to achieve treatment-free remission. METHOD: From over 700 patients with CML who were treated at two centres over the last three decades, this retrospective study identified eight patients characterised by long-term treatment failure and simultaneous prolonged significant haematologic toxicity that prevented the use of the standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor dosage. RESULTS: Patients had a high or intermediate ELTS risk score, and most had significant comorbidities. Two patients were treated previously with busulfan, and four were aged over 70, which might explain the reduced pool of normal haematopoietic stem cells. However, concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome or the presence of clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential was not demonstrated. Despite prolonged treatment failure, the survival of these patients (who were ineligible for stem cell transplantation) ranged from 45-396 months. Neither mutations in the ABL kinase domain nor additional cytogenetic abnormalities developed during the treatment of these patients, prompting speculation about the low selective pressure of low-dose tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or the absence of mutations at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: It is important not to stop treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors at a low personalised dosage in CML patients with prolonged significant haematologic toxicity despite long-term treatment failure.

The impact of bone marrow irradiation dose on acute haematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of bone marrow (BM) irradiation dose on acute haematologic toxicity (HT) in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with cervical cancer treated with curative or postoperative adjuvant therapy received weekly cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The whole pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was delineated and divided into three subsites: ilium (IL), lower pelvis (LP), and lumbosacral spine (LS). Associations between clinical variables, dose volume of BM, including PBM, IL, LP, and LS in the form of x-Vy (volume receiving y Gy for x), and blood cell count nadir were tested using linear regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was further used to analyse the cutoff values of the variables with p < 0.05 in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In 69 patients, the haemoglobin nadir was positive correlated with baseline haemoglobin (p < 0.001), negative correlated with relative LP-V10 (p = 0.005), relative LP-V25 (p = 0.002), relative LP-V50 (p = 0.007), relative LP-mean (p = 0.003), absolute LP-V15 (p = 0.049), absolute LP-V25 (p = 0.004) and absolute LP-V30 (p = 0.009). The platelet nadir was positive correlated with baseline platelets (p = 0.048) and negative correlated with relative LP-V40 (p = 0.028), but there was no significant variable in absolute radiation volume by multivariate analysis. No variables related to the neutrophil nadir were found, and the 69 patients were divided into group A (43 cases) receiving 3-4 cycles of CCT and group B (26 cases) receiving 5-6 cycles of CCT. In group A, the relative IL-V15 (p = 0.014), the relative IL-V50 (p = 0.010) and the absolute LP-V50 (p = 0.011) were negative correlated with the neutrophil nadir. No significant variable was found in group B. No significant variables related to the lymphocyte nadir were found, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was analysed. Age (p < 0.05), relative LP-V15 (p = 0.037) and absolute PBM-mean (p < 0.001) were found to be negative related to NLR. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric parameters of relative irradiated volume of BM have more statistically significant datas on acute HT than absolute irradiated volume. The nadir of haemoglobin and platelets and the vertice of NLR were more affected by the irradiation dose to LP, while neutrophils were more affected by the dose to IL. Acute HT was negative related to both low-dose irradiation (V10-30) and high-dose irradiation (V40, V50). For more than 4 cycles of CCT, the effect of BM irradiation on the neutrophils nadir was masked by chemotherapy.