Common caregiver illness representations in the context of family-based treatment: Commentary on Marchetti and Sawrikar (2023).

In their systematic review on parent illness representations in their children with anorexia nervosa (AN), Marchetti and Sawrikar (International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2023) integrate past research on the parental experience of the illness, investigating whether the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) is a useful framework for understanding parental responses to AN. Given that family-based treatment (FBT) is a first-line treatment for adolescents with eating disorders and is based upon integrating parents into the treatment process, it is especially relevant to explore how parent illness representations may impact FBT. In this commentary, we describe how FBT is designed to support parents and address many of the common unhelpful beliefs and emotions associated with parenting an adolescent with AN. We include specific examples of how parents can be supported within FBT as manualized. We also examine parental representations that may not be addressed by FBT, and how these may impact treatment outcomes in FBT, possibly via the impact of expressed emotion. Future research is needed to determine if modifications to FBT are required to address parental representations of the illness. We end by expanding upon Marchetti and Sawrikar's suggestions on how treatment could be extended to better support parents as necessary.

Beliefs About the Causes of Alzheimer's Disease Among Latinos in New York City.

Latinos face health disparities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with high disease prevalence relative to non-Latino whites and barriers to healthcare access. Several studies have found misconceptions about AD among Latinos that were linked to reduced preventative or help-seeking behavior. To improve understanding of illness perceptions among Latinos, we examined beliefs about the causes of AD, one of the five dimensions of illness representations from Leventhal's Self-Regulation Theory, among a sample of N = 216 Latinos. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participants aged 40 to 64 (average age 53 years) living in northern Manhattan. Seven distinct causes of AD were identified, though participants demonstrated a general understanding of AD as a multifactorial disease. Genetics was found to be the most endorsed cause of AD, followed by unhealthy lifestyle factors. Most Latinos who believed psychosocial factors played a critical role in AD development were first-generation immigrants. No participants attributed AD to a normal process of aging, and few ascribed the disease to brain damage from stroke or head injuries. Several participants expressed the belief that environmental contaminants can cause AD, which has received little mention in prior studies. Though only a small number thought AD could occur by chance, most participants remained uncertain about the exact causes of the disease and used lay knowledge to explain their beliefs. Our findings help identify areas where educational interventions would be beneficial in improving community knowledge and offer perspectives that can foster cultural competency in healthcare.

Illness perceptions in people with chronic and disabling non-specific neck pain seeking primary healthcare: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Illness perceptions can affect the way people with musculoskeletal pain emotionally and behaviorally cope with their health condition. Understanding patients illness perceptions may help facilitate patient-centered care. The purpose of this study was to explore illness perceptions and the origin of those perceptions in people with chronic disabling non-specific neck pain seeking primary care. METHODS: A qualitative study using a deductive and inductive analytical approach was conducted in 20 people with persistent (> 3 months) and disabling (i.e., Neck Disability Index ≥ 15) neck pain. Using a semi-structured format, participants were interviewed about their illness perceptions according to Leventhal's Common Sense Model. Purposive sampling and member checking were used to secure validity of study results. RESULTS: Participants reported multiple symptoms, thoughts and emotions related to their neck pain, which continuously required attention and action. They felt trapped within a complex multifactorial problem. Although some participants had a broader biopsychosocial perspective to understand their symptoms, a biomedical perspective was dominant in the labelling of their condition and their way of coping (e.g., limiting load, building strength and resilience, regaining mobility, keep moving and being meaningful). Their perceptions were strongly influenced by information from clinicians. Several participants indicated that they felt uncertain, because the information they received was contradictory or did not match their own experiences. CONCLUSION: Most participants reported that understanding their pain was important to them and influenced how they coped with pain. Addressing this 'sense making process' is a prerequisite for providing patient-centered care.

Illness perceptions in cochlear implant users - a longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: 'Illness perceptions' refers to the thoughts and ideas a person has about an illness. According to Leventhal's Self-Regulatory Model (SRM), changing the threatening illness perceptions of cochlear implant (CI) recipients can be a further step in optimizing hearing outcomes with the CI. The aims of the present study were to assess users' illness perceptions and to determine whether perceptions change during six months of CI rehabilitation. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight participants completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), assessing their illness perceptions on nine scales. Data were collected at a German CI center at first CI fitting and six-month follow-up. After first fitting, participants underwent intensive rehabilitation including auditory training, medical, audiological and psychological treatments. RESULTS: At both assessments, participants tended to view their hearing impairment as a severe threat. On the Brief IPQ, the 'consequences' assessment improved during CI rehabilitation, which can be explained by the CI-induced hearing improvement. However, 'understanding' and 'identity' assessments worsened. This could be because CI recipients only come to realize the full complexity of their hearing impairment during rehabilitation. The other scales and the total score remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice in CI rehabilitation seems to be insufficient to improve threatening illness perceptions (except for perceived consequences). This may be because standard information often fails to reach the patients. The development and empirical validation of an intervention program to address individual illness perceptions in CI recipients could be helpful in this context. Further research will be needed to confirm the results.

Conceptualizing Symptom Invalidation as Experienced by Patients With Endometriosis.

The aim of this paper is to provide foundational work to standardize the conceptual definition of what I refer to as symptom invalidation by using invalidating environments and illness representations as guiding conceptual frameworks. Mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze survey responses to an open-ended question gauging an invalidating interaction patients experienced with a clinician among 1038 patients with endometriosis. Dissimilarity in illness representations between patients and clinicians, as perceived by patients, occurred with feelings of invalidation. Invalidation was experienced in relationship to all identified domains of illness representations including how clinicians communicated the diagnosis (identity label), the internal (internal cause) and/or external (external cause) nature of the cause, clinicians' understanding of the timeline (timeline) and consequences (consequences), and clinicians' understanding of control over the symptoms via the efficacy of patients (self-efficacy) and coping procedures (response efficacy). Inductive analysis revealed invalidation can also be related to how clinicians communicate judgments of whether patients are presenting with ulterior motives (secondary gains). Clinicians' actions appear to compound experiences of invalidation by not having symptoms investigated (investigative experiences). Invalidating environments and illness representations serve as effective conceptual frameworks for providing a conceptual definition of symptom invalidation.

Prospective Associations Between Personality Traits and Major Depressive Disorder Symptom Severity: The Mediating Role of Illness Representations.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) patients' personality traits and illness representations are linked to MDD severity. However, the associations between personality and illness representations in MDD and the mediating role of illness representations between personality and MDD severity have not been investigated. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the aforementioned associations and the possible mediating role of illness representations between personality and MDD severity. One hundred twenty-five patients with a MDD diagnosis, aged 48.18 ± 13.92 (84% females), participated in the study. Personality traits were measured with the Traits Personality Questionnaire at baseline. Illness representations were measured with the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Mental Health about five months later (mean = 5.08 ± 1.14 months). MDD severity was measured about 10 months after the baseline assessment (mean = 9.53 ± 2.36 months) with the Beck Depression Inventory. SPSS 29 and AMOS 27 were used to conduct correlational and parallel mediation analyses. According to the results, Neuroticism was positively and Extraversion was negatively linked to MDD severity. Negative MDD impact representations fully mediated these associations. Neuroticism and Extraversion are linked to future MDD severity through patients' representations of MDD's impact. Restructuring maladaptive representations about MDD's impact can be a promising way to reduce symptom severity in patients with high Neuroticism and low Extraversion levels.

Coping strategies, illness perceptions, and relationship dynamics contribute to female sexual function and sexual distress in Sjögren's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction and sexual distress are common complaints for women with the autoimmune rheumatic disease Sjögren's syndrome (SS); however, the role of psychosocial and interpersonal factors has not previously been explored in SS. AIM: This study investigated whether psychosocial variables, such as coping strategies, illness perceptions, and relationship dynamics, contributed to sexual function and sexual distress for women with SS. METHODS: Participants with SS completed an online cross-sectional survey that included prevalidated questionnaires assessing sexual function, sexual distress, disease-related symptom experiences, cognitive coping strategies, illness perceptions, relationship satisfaction, and partners' behavioral responses. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors significantly associated with sexual function (total Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI] score) and sexual distress (total Female Sexual Distress Scale score) for women with SS. OUTCOMES: Study outcome measures were the FSFI, Female Sexual Distress Scale, EULAR SjÓ§gren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, numeric rating scale for vaginal dryness (0-10), Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ), West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI), and Maudsley Marital Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 98 cisgender women with SS participated in the study (mean age = 48.13 years, SD = 13.26). Vaginal dryness was reported by 92.9% of participants, and clinical levels of sexual dysfunction (total FSFI score <26.55) were observed in 85.2% (n = 69/81) of cases. More vaginal dryness, lower CERQ positive reappraisal, and higher CERQ catastrophizing were significantly associated with poorer self-rated sexual function (R2 = 0.420, F3,72 = 17.394, P < .001). Higher CERQ rumination, lower CERQ perspective, lower WHYMPI distracting responses, and higher B-IPQ identity were significantly associated with higher sexual distress (R2 = 0.631, F5,83 = 28.376, P < .001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that interpersonal and psychosocial factors are important contributors to sexual function and distress in women with SS and that the development of psychosocial interventions for this population is warranted. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is one of the first to explore the impacts of coping strategies, illness perceptions, and relationship dynamics on sexual function and sexual distress for women with SS. Limitations of our study include its cross-sectional nature and narrow sample demographic, which limit the generalizability of our results to other population groups. CONCLUSION: Women with SS who utilized adaptive coping strategies had better sexual function and lower levels of sexual distress than women who utilized maladaptive coping strategies.

Does explaining psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using either a biomedical or biopsychosocial framework affect young people's illness representations? An experimental vignette study.

Lay representations of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are important both for understanding public stigma and anticipating patient responses to PNES diagnosis. The current study presents the first evidence of the general public's representations of PNES and the malleability of these understandings to different ways of explaining PNES. An online experimental study exposed participants (n = 193, aged 18-25 years) to a vignette describing a case of PNES in biomedical terms, PNES in biopsychosocial terms, or epilepsy. Subsequent questionnaires assessed participants' illness representations, causal attributions, and stigmatising attitudes regarding the case about which they read. Results suggest that compared with biomedical framings, biopsychosocial explanations increased perceptions of PNES as threatening. While epilepsy was attributed to significantly more biological and less social causes than either of the PNES vignettes, causal attributions did not differ between biomedically- vs. biopsychosocially-framed PNES. Neither were there any differences between the three conditions in stigmatising attitudes towards people who experience seizures. These findings are useful for clinicians delivering a PNES diagnosis and patients disclosing a PNES diagnosis, in helping anticipate responses to these communications. Further research is required to confirm the clinical and societal significance of the study's first insights into the dynamics of lay responses to PNES.

Common Sense Models of Obesity: a Qualitative Investigation of Illness Representations.

BACKGROUND: The Common Sense Model provides a framework to understand health beliefs and behaviors. It includes illness representations comprised of five domains (identity, cause, consequences, timeline, and control/cure). While widely used, it is rarely applied to obesity, yet could explain self-management decisions and inform treatments. This study answered the question, what are patients' illness representations of obesity?; and examined the Common Sense Model's utility in the context of obesity. METHODS: Twenty-four participants with obesity completed semi-structured phone interviews (12 women, 12 men). Directed content analysis of transcripts/notes was used to understand obesity illness representations across the five illness domains. Potential differences by gender and race/ethnicity were assessed. RESULTS: Participants did not use clinical terms to discuss weight. Participants' experiences across domains were interconnected. Most described interacting life systems as causing weight problems and used negative consequences of obesity to identify it as a health threat. The control/cure of obesity was discussed within every domain. Participants focused on health and appearance consequences (the former most salient to older, the latter most salient to younger adults). Weight-related timelines were generally chronic. Women more often described negative illness representations and episodic causes (e.g., pregnancy). No patterns were identified by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The Common Sense Model is useful in the context of obesity. Obesity illness representations highlighted complex causes and consequences of obesity and its management. To improve weight-related care, researchers and clinicians should focus on these beliefs in relation to preferred labels for obesity, obesity's most salient consequences, and ways of monitoring change.

COVID-19 pandemic-related representations, self-efficacy, and psychological well-being in the general population during lockdown.

The aim of this study was to examine the association among representations of the COVID-19 pandemic, self-efficacy to cope with the anti-pandemic measures (e.g., general lockdown), and psychological distress in the Greek general population. The study was conducted online, during the general lockdown in the country, and 358 individuals (239 females) participated (mean age = 36.89; SD = 12.15). A perception of personal control over the condition, negative emotions towards the pandemic, and self-efficacy to cope with the current anti-pandemic measures were related to psychological distress. Also, a significant interaction between representation clusters and self-efficacy to cope with potential future difficulties (i.e., after the anti-pandemic measures are ended), was found. Specifically, the association between this type of self-efficacy and psychological distress was significant only for the 'low-impact' representations cluster (i.e., a perception of the pandemic as less burdensome and more controllable). The findings indicate that the factors which, according to previous research and theory, are significantly related to psychological distress during a health threat, are important also in times of a pandemic. They also suggest a potential adaptation-promoting synergy between pandemic-related self-efficacy and a more positive representation of COVID-19, as far as psychological distress is conerned. Thus, these factors may serve as the basis for the development of pandemic-related health behavior promotion programs.

Illness representations, coping and anxiety among men with localized prostate cancer over an 18-months period: A parallel vs. level-contrast mediation approach.

OBJECTIVE: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (lPCa) are confronted with the decision for a treatment strategy, potentially experiencing treatment side effects and psychological distress. The Common Sense Model proposes that coping with such challenges is related to illness representations: Beliefs regarding consequences, coherence, timeline, and controllability of the illness. We analyzed the interplay of illness representations, coping and anxiety over an 18-month period among men with lPCa undergoing different treatment options (Active Surveillance, curative treatment). METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 183 men (age M = 66.83) answered a questionnaire before starting treatment, and 6, 12, and 18 months later. We analyzed time trajectories with growth curve modeling and conducted mediation analyses to evaluate the influence of coping on the association of illness representations and anxiety. Using a novel methodological approach, we compared a classic parallel mediation model with a level-contrast approach for the correlated mediators problem- and emotion-focused coping. RESULTS: Independent of treatment (b = 1.31, p = 0.200) men reported an elevated level of anxiety after diagnosis which declined considerably within the following 6 months (b = -1.87, p = 0.009). The perceived seriousness of consequences was significantly associated with greater anxiety, at baseline (ß = 0.471) and over time (all ß ≥ 0.204). This association was mediated by coping: Using more emotion-than problem-focused coping was associated with higher anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a lPCa diagnosis is associated with a phase of increased anxiety. In order to reduce anxiety, information provision should be accompanied by developing concrete action plans to enable problem-focused coping strategies.

The common-sense model and mental illness outcomes: A meta-analysis.

Psychotherapists can improve their patients' outcomes during and after therapy by improving patients' self-management. Patients who do not effectively manage their mental illness generally have worse outcomes. Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation theorizes that patients' perceptions of their illness (illness representations) guide their self-management, influencing health outcomes. The present study quantified the relations between illness representations, self-management and outcomes for mental illnesses. We conducted a meta-analysis and included articles if they reported (1) on adults with mental illnesses and (2) the correlation between mental illness representations and mental illness outcomes. Twenty-five articles were included which represented 28 independent samples. The pattern of correlations among illness representations (identity, consequences, timeline, control, coherence and emotional representations), self-management strategies (attendance, engagement and adherence to treatment) and mental illness outcomes (symptom severity and quality of life) was consistent with analyses from previous studies of mental and physical illnesses. The results found threat-related illness representations mostly had a large relationship with worse mental illness outcomes and self-management. Protective illness representations had a small-to-large relationship with better mental illness outcomes and self-management. The results suggest patients' perceptions of their mental illness may be a critical indicator of their mental illness outcomes, including symptom severity and quality of life. This theory-driven meta-analysis supports calls for the inclusion of illness representations in psychotherapy for mental illness.

The relationship between illness representations, alexithymia, coping strategies and subjective well-being among persons with asthma.

BACKGROUND: In order to examine subjective well-being (SWB) among persons with asthma, most of the existing studies have focused on disease-related variables or concentrated on illness representations, alexithymia and coping, making it difficult to determine whether the relationship between illness representations, alexithymia, coping and SWB is just an artifact of the disease's severity. OBJECTIVE: Based on the Self-Regulation Model, this study aimed to examine the interrelationships between the disease's characteristics (annual mean of asthma attacks, preventive treatment), illness representations, alexithymia, coping strategies and SWB among persons with asthma. METHODS: A convenience sample of 208 persons with asthma completed measures of the disease's characteristics (annual mean of asthma attacks, preventive treatment), illness representations (identity, causes, timeline, consequences, control, coherence, emotional representations), alexithymia, coping strategies, SWB, and socio-demographic questionnaires. A hierarchical multiple regression was calculated with SWB as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The regression model was found significant (F(14, 133) = 6.42, p < 0.001), explaining 34% of the variance in SWB. Higher levels of alexithymia, identity, cause and emotional representations and lower levels of control were related to lower levels of SWB. The addition of coping strategies did not add to the explained variance of SWB. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to a better understanding of the determinants of SWB among persons with asthma. The findings indicate that clinical interventions targeting persons with asthma illness representations and alexithymia may assist persons with asthma to improve their SWB.

Sociodemographic and Psychological Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression: Findings from the Covid-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland on Mental Health (CHARIS-MH) Cross-sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: Investigations about mental health report prevalence rates with fewer studies investigating psychological and social factors influencing mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic. STUDY AIMS: (1) identify sociodemographic groups of the adult population at risk of anxiety and depression and (2) determine if the following social and psychological risk factors for poor mental health moderated these direct sociodemographic effects: loneliness, social support, threat perception, illness representations. METHODS: Cross-sectional nationally representative telephone survey in Scotland in June 2020. If available, validated instruments were used, for example, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) to measure anxiety and depression. Simple linear regressions followed by examination of moderation effect. RESULTS: A total of 1006 participants; median age 53 years, 61.4% female, from all levels of area deprivation (i.e., 3.8% in the most deprived decile and 15.6% in the most affluent decile). Analyses show associations of anxiety and depression with sociodemographic (age, gender, deprivation), social (social support, loneliness) and psychological factors (perceived threat and illness representations). Mental health was poorer in younger adults, women and people living in the most deprived areas. Age effects were exacerbated by loneliness and illness representations, gender effects by loneliness and illness representations and deprivation effects by loneliness, social support, illness representations and perceived threat. In each case, the moderating variables amplified the detrimental effects of the sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the results of pre-Covid-19 pandemic studies about associations between sociodemographics and mental health. Loneliness, lack of social support and thoughts about Covid-19 exacerbated these effects and offer pointers for pre-emptive action.

Utilizing the Common-Sense model of illness representations to explore children's perceptions of, and coping with ADHD.

BACKGROUND: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among children is associated with difficulties in everyday functioning. According to the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations (CSM), individuals' beliefs about their illness condition guide their attempts to cope with it. The model suggests five dimensions of illness representations: beliefs regarding the identity of the symptoms, its duration, causes, consequences, and one's ability to achieve control over it. AIMS: The study aimed to explore the validity of the CSM-dimensions of illness representations for children with ADHD, while also exploring the possible relationships between types of beliefs and coping strategies. METHOD: A deductive qualitative content analysis was used for analyzing data constructed from semi-structured individual interviews with 14 children diagnosed with ADHD. RESULTS: The results have shown that there is a variation in children's beliefs regarding their ADHD. Those beliefs are, for the most part, captured by the five CSM-dimensions. An additional dimension of 'Uniqueness' is suggested, which reflects children's beliefs on the way ADHD distinguishes them from other children. Patterns regarding types of beliefs and types of coping strategies were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The CSM is a useful theoretical model to understand children's beliefs of, and coping with their ADHD.

Clinical practice to address tamoxifen nonadherence.

The primary and secondary benefits of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer are substantial: a 1% decrease in the risk of death each year for 10 years with each additional year of treatment during the first 5 years. Considerable data, however, indicate that these benefits are lost to many patients because of treatment nonadherence. Nonadherence is examined within the framework of the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation to describe patients' models of disease and treatment that organize their thinking and behavior, and the crucial role of the practitioner in addressing and altering these models. Common patient education and social communications about patients' hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and tamoxifen treatment promote an acute disease paradigm in which cancer occurs within specific locations and is either present or absent. We recommend that clinicians communicate the concepts of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer as follows: i. a non-dichotomous systemic disorder entailing a treatment goal of homeostasis and disease quiescence and ii. a disorder undetectable by currently available tests in subclinical states. Equally important, the clinician can provide a comprehensive picture of the well-documented secondary effects of tamoxifen, noting in particular the beneficial effects. Specific action plans, grounded in individual patient understanding, can be developed and reinforced, in an ongoing process that validates and integrates patient values and goals as they change over time.

"I had no other choice but to catch it too": the roles of family history and experiences with diabetes in illness representations.

BACKGROUND: A family history of diabetes and family members' experiences with diabetes may influence individuals' beliefs and expectations about their own diabetes. No qualitative studies have explored the relationship between family history and experiences and individuals' diabetes illness representations. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of 89 exploratory, semi-structured interviews with adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes seeking care in an urban health system. Participants had a recent diabetes-related ED visit/hospitalization or hemoglobin A1c > 7.5%. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Demographic data were collected via self-report and electronic medical record review. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using a conventional content analysis approach. References to family history and family members' experiences with diabetes were analyzed using selected domains of Leventhal's Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation. RESULTS: Participants cited both genetic and behavioral family history as a major cause of their diabetes. Stories of relatives' diabetes complications and death figured prominently in their discussion of consequences; however, participants felt controllability over diabetes through diet, physical activity, and other self-care behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported an important role of family diabetes history and experience in development of diabetes illness representations. Further research is needed to expand our understanding of the relationships between these perceptions, self-management behaviors, and outcomes. Family practice providers, diabetes educators and other team members should consider expanding assessment of current family structure and support to also include an exploration of family history with diabetes, including which family members had diabetes, their self-care behaviors, and their outcomes, and how this history fits into the patient's illness representations.

Contribution of the self-regulation model to understanding the health related quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

PURPOSE: This study examined a comprehensive model that integrates the interrelationships among health-related-quality-of-life (HRQoL), disease duration, disease severity, illness representations, and coping resources regarding patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on the Self-regulation model. METHOD: A convenience sample of 164 patients with RA completed measures of disease's characteristics (disease duration, disease status), illness representations (timeline, consequences, self-control, treatment control, symptom burden, concern about RA, understanding RA, emotional representations), coping resources (resilience, social support), HRQoL, and socio-demographic questionnaires. The research model was assessed through path analysis. RESULTS: Perceptions of higher treatment control, lower consequences of RA and lower symptom burden were directly related to HRQoL. The perceptions of higher self-control, higher treatment control, less concern about RA, and lower emotional representations were associated with higher resilience, which in turn was associated with higher HRQoL. The perceptions of higher treatment control, greater understanding of RA, and lower emotional representations were associated with higher perceived social support; however, social support was not associated with HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to a better understanding of the determinants of HRQoL among RA patients. The findings indicate that clinical interventions targeting RA patients' illness representations and resilience may assist patients with RA to improve their HRQoL.

Living with the dilemma of the treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and the risk of incident heart disease: A qualitative investigation of patients' experiences.

OBJECTIVE: Herceptin treatment improves survival and reduces the risk of recurrence in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Yet, it increases women's risk of developing burdensome cardiovascular complications. This study examines how women experience living with HER2-positive breast cancer and the risk of incident heart disease. METHODS: Danish women with breast cancer (n = 12; aged 32-75) participated in semi-structured interviews. Themes were deducted using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). RESULTS: Women described breast cancer as having strong associations with death, whereas heart disease to them meant decreased physical functioning or "something fixable." MUGA scans of the heart during the treatment course made them feel safe, and generally, they did not worry about risk of heart disease. Coping strategies included the following: focus on the good aspects of herceptin and acceptance of risk of heart disease as the price to pay to survive. The two most predominant coping strategies used were information and avoidance. CONCLUSION: The women's focus on cancer as the primary disease seems partly to be the result of a complex coping process, by which they dealt with the dilemma of weighing risks, where the risk of dying from breast cancer was perceived as the biggest risk.

Individual and Family Management in Portuguese Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: a Path Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the adequacy of the Revised Self and Family Management Framework (Grey et al., Nurs Outlook 63:162-170, 2015) in Portuguese adolescents with type 1 diabetes and analyzes the effect of parental coping, family support, and adherence in the association between illness representations, school support, metabolic control, quality of life, and family functioning. METHOD: One hundred adolescents (aged 12-19) and their parents participated in a cross-sectional study. Adolescents were assessed on school support, adherence to self-care, family support, and quality of life. Parents were assessed on parental coping and family functioning. Both adolescents and parents were assessed on illness representations. Adolescent's metabolic control was evaluated through glycosylate hemoglobin. RESULTS: Adolescents' and parents' illness representations were associated with metabolic control, quality of life and family functioning. Parental coping, family support and adherence had an indirect effect between illness representations and diabetes outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings showed the adequacy of Grey and colleagues' model (Nurs Outlook 63:162-170, 2015) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and how family support, parental coping, and adherence contribute to diabetes management. Interventions to improve adolescents' and family's management of Type 1 diabetes should be designed to change adolescents' and family's representations and enhance their ability and skills in diabetes management.