Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Virol J ; 21(1): 220, 2024 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human adenovirus type 55 (hAd55) infection can lead to acute respiratory diseases that often present with severe symptoms. Despite its persistent prevalence in military camps and communities, there are no commercially available vaccines or vaccine candidates undergoing clinical evaluation; therefore, there is an urgent need to address this. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity of inactivated hAd55 isolates and investigated the effects of adjuvants and various immunization intervals. METHODS AND RESULTS: To select a vaccine candidate, four hAd55 strains (6-9, 6-15 (AFMRI 41014), 28-48 (AFMRI 41013), and 12-164 (AFMRI 41012)) were isolated from infected patients in military camps. Sequence analysis revealed no variation in the coding regions of structural proteins, including pentons, hexons, and fibers. Immunization with inactivated hAd55 isolates elicited robust hAd55-specific binding and neutralizing antibody responses in mice, with adjuvants, particularly alum hydroxide (AH), enhancing antibody titers. Co-immunization with AH also induced hAd14-specific neutralizing antibody responses but did not induce hAd11-specific neutralizing antibody responses. Notably, booster immunization administered at a four-week interval resulted in superior immune responses compared with shorter immunization intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Prime-boost immunization with the inactivated hAd55 isolate and an AH adjuvant shows promise as a potential approach for preventing hAd55-induced respiratory disease. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these vaccine candidates in preventing hAd55-associated respiratory illnesses.


Assuntos
Adenovírus Humanos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Imunização Secundária , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Camundongos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Humanos , Adenovírus Humanos/imunologia , Adenovírus Humanos/genética , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Vacinas contra Adenovirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Adenovirus/administração & dosagem , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Adenovirus Humanos/imunologia , Infecções por Adenovirus Humanos/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Adenovirus Humanos/virologia
2.
Proteomics ; 23(2): e2200306, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205637

RESUMO

The majority of people in China have been immunized with the inactivated viral vaccine BBIBP-CorV. The emergence of the Omicron variant raised the concerns about protection efficacy of the inactivated viral vaccine in China. However, longitudinal neutralization data describing protection efficacy against Omicron variant is still lacking. Here we present one-year longitudinal neutralization data of BBIBP-CorV on authentic Omicron, Delta, and wild-type strains using 224 sera collected from 14 volunteers who have finished three doses BBIBP-CorV. The sera were also subjected for monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgA, and IgM responses on protein and peptide microarrays. The neutralization titers showed different protection efficacies against the three strains. By incorporating IgG and IgA signals of proteins and Spike protein derived peptide on microarray, panels as potential surrogate biomarkers for rapid estimation of neutralization titers were established. These data support the necessity of the 3rd dose of BBIBP-CorV vaccination. After further validation and assay development, the panels could be used for reliable, convenient and fast evaluation of the efficacy of vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Imunoglobulina G , Vacinação , Imunoglobulina A , Anticorpos Antivirais
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(7)2023 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37514976

RESUMO

Background: The administration of the third (or booster) dose of COVID-19 vaccine is important in maintaining protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or the severity of the disease. In Indonesia, health care workers (HCWs) are among the first to receive a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. In this study, we evaluated the antibody response and adverse events following heterologous booster vaccine using mRNA-1273 among HCWs that were fully vaccinated with inactivated viral vaccine as the priming doses. Methods: 75 HCWs at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, participated in this study. The level of antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain was analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 months following the second priming dose and at 1, 3, and 5 months after the booster dose. Results: We found a significantly higher level of antibody response in subjects receiving a booster dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine compared to those receiving an inactivated viral vaccine as a booster. Interestingly, participants with hypertension and a history of diabetes mellitus showed a lower antibody response following the booster dose. There was a higher frequency of adverse events following injection with the mRNA-1273 vaccine compared to the inactivated viral vaccine, although the overall adverse events were considered minor. Conclusions: A heterologous booster dose using mRNA vaccine resulted in a high antibody response; however, participants with hypertension and diabetes mellitus displayed a lower antibody response.

4.
Vaccine ; 40(30): 4046-4056, 2022 06 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660034

RESUMO

Several types of vaccines have been developed to prevent the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is important to understand whether demographic and clinical variables affect the effectiveness of various types of vaccines. This study analysed the association between demographic/clinical factors, antibody response and vaccine effectiveness in healthcare workers vaccinated with inactivated virus. We enrolled 101 healthcare workers who received two doses of inactivated viral vaccine (CoronaVac). Blood samples were analysed at 1, 3, and 5 months after the second dose of vaccination. Data regarding demographic characteristics, medical histories, and clinical parameters were collected by interview and medical examination. In a separate retrospective study, we analysed the incidence of vaccine breakthrough infection on 2714 healthcare workers who received two doses of inactivated viral vaccine. Medical histories and demographic data were collected using a structured self-reported questionnaire. We found that antibody titres markedly increased at 1 month after vaccination but gradually decreased at 3-5 months post-vaccination. We observed a significant association between age (≥40 years) and antibody level, whereas sex and body mass index (BMI) exhibited no effect on antibody titres. Amongst clinical variables analysed, high blood pressure and history of hypertension were significantly correlated with lower antibody titres. Consistently, we found a significant association in the retrospective study between hypertension and the incidence of breakthrough infection. In conclusion, our results showed that hypertension is associated with lower antibody titres and breakthrough infection following COVID-19 vaccination. Thus, blood pressure control might be important to improve the efficacy of inactivated virus vaccine.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Vacinas Virais , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Formação de Anticorpos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados
5.
Vaccine ; 40(13): 2003-2010, 2022 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35193793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This is a community-based, retrospective, observational study conducted to determine effectiveness of the BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine in the real-world setting against hospital admissions and death. STUDY DESIGN: Study participants were selected from 214,940 PCR-positive cases of COVID-19 reported to the Department of Health, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates (UAE) between September 01, 2020 and May 1, 2021. Of these, 176,640 individuals were included in the study who were aged ≥ 15 years with confirmed COVID-19 positive status who had records linked to their vaccination status. Those with incomplete or missing records were excluded (n = 38,300). Study participants were divided into three groups depending upon their vaccination status: fully vaccinated (two doses), partially vaccinated (single dose), and non-vaccinated. Study outcomes included COVID-19-related admissions to hospital general and critical care wards and death. Vaccine effectiveness for each outcome was based on the incidence density per 1000 person-years. RESULTS: The fully-, partially- and non-vaccinated groups included 62,931, 21,768 and 91,941 individuals, respectively. Based on the incidence rate ratios, the vaccine effectiveness in fully vaccinated individuals was 80%, 92%, and 97% in preventing COVID-19-related hospital admissions, critical care admissions, and death, respectively, when compared to the non-vaccinated group. No protection was observed for critical and non-critical care hospital admissions for the partially vaccinated group, while some protection against death was apparent, although statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: In a COVID-19 pandemic, use of the Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine is effective in preventing severe disease and death in a two-dose regimen. Lack of protection with the single dose may be explained by insufficient seroconversion and/or neutralizing antibody responses, behavioral factors (i.e., false sense of protection), and/or other biological factors (emergence of variants, possibility of reinfection, duration of vaccine protection, etc.).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Emirados Árabes Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA