Independent association between IVC filter placement and VTE risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and isolated distal DVT: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters often emerges as an alternative preventative measure against pulmonary embolism in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We aimed to investigate the association of IVC filter placement and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence in this patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 450 patients with upper GI bleeding and isolated distal DVT. Propensity score matching using logistic regression was conducted to mitigate potential selection bias. Logistic regression models and additional sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the association between IVC filter implantation and VTE recurrence. Interaction and stratified analyses were also performed according to the background covariates. RESULTS: Patients who underwent IVC filter placement were significantly younger than patients in the surveillance group (55.8 ± 9.0 vs 58.4 ± 11.2 years, p = 0.034). Patients in the IVC filter group demonstrated a higher distal thrombus burden. The VTE recurrence composite was significantly higher in patients who underwent IVC filter placement (44.1% [45/102] vs 25% [87/348], p < 0.001). Unmatched crude logistic regression analysis identified a significant association between IVC filter placement and VTE recurrence composite (OR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.50-3.75). Sensitivity analyses yielded congruent outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study revealed an increased risk of VTE recurrence among patients receiving IVC filter placement, suggesting that IVC filter placement may not be suitable as a primary treatment for patients with upper GI bleeding and isolated distal DVT.

Inferior vena cava reconstruction with non-fascial autologous peritoneum: Retrospective study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is essential for complete (R0) excision of some malignancies. However, the optimal material for IVC reconstruction remains unclear. Our objective is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and advantages of using Non-Fascial Autologous Peritoneum (NFAP) for IVC reconstruction. To conduct a literature review of surgical strategies for tumors involving the IVC. METHODS: We reviewed all IVC reconstructions performed at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Preoperative, operative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 33 consecutive IVC reconstructions were identified: seven direct sutures, eight venous homografts (VH), and 18 NFAP. With regard to NFAP, eight tubular (mean length, 12.5 cm) and 10 patch (mean length, 7.9 cm) IVC reconstructions were performed. Resection was R0 in 89% of the cases. Two patients had Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, 2 grade II, 2 grade III and 2 grade V complications. The only graft-related complication was a case of early partial thrombosis, which was conservatively treated. At a mean follow-up of 25.9 months, graft patency was 100%. There were seven recurrences and six deaths. Mean overall survival (OS) was 23.4 months and mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 14.4 months. According to our results, no statistically significant differences were found between NFAP and VH. CONCLUSIONS: NFAP is a safe and effective alternative for partial or complete IVC reconstruction and has many advantages over other techniques, including its lack of cost, wide and ready availability, extreme handiness, and versatility. Further comparative studies are required to determine the optimal technique for IVC reconstruction.

Increased incidence of venous thromboembolism associated with inferior vena cava filter placement in patients diagnosed with isolated calf deep vein thrombosis after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation.

In this study, we sought to investigate the effectiveness of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients diagnosed with isolated calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after an intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation. A retrospective chart review (January 2000-December 2019) was performed to identify patients diagnosed with calf DVT after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation. A total of 100 patients met the study criteria and were divided into groups based on treatment: IVC filter placement (n = 22), prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 42), or imaging surveillance (n = 36). Treatment-related complications were identified, and differences between groups in the primary endpoint (VTE occurrence after DVT diagnosis) were assessed using logistic regression. VTE occurred in 15 patients after calf DVT diagnosis. The rate of VTE was higher in the IVC filter group (9/22; 41%) than in the anticoagulation (2/42; 5%; p = 0.002) and surveillance (4/36; 11%; p = 0.013) groups. These treatment effects remained significant after adjustments were made for baseline characteristics (IVC filter vs anticoagulation, p = 0.009; IVC filter vs surveillance, p = 0.019). There was a single occurrence of pulmonary embolism in the surveillance group (3%). A single case of IVC filter thrombus was identified; no anticoagulation-related complications were reported. The findings of this study do not support IVC filter placement as a primary and solitary treatment for isolated calf DVT occurring after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation.

Innovation in direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; a developing country experience.

Anticoagulants are the first-line treatment option for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS); however, intervention is required when this fails. Although, the ultimate treatment is liver transplant, other radiological procedures are for the management of the disease and bridge to definitive therapy. TIPS (trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) is a method used by interventional radiologists to create a shunt between portal vein and hepatic vein. At times it is technically not possible, in such cases, direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS) is performed. This patient underwent a successful DIPS procedure for BCS along with balloon dilatation (venoplasty) for inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis.

Resection of retroperitoneal tumors with inferior vena cava involvement without caval reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retroperitoneal tumors with involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) often require resection of the IVC to achieve complete tumor removal. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of IVC ligation without caval reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent IVC ligation (IVC-Ligation) and IVC resection with reconstruction (IVC-Reconstruction) at our institution between May 2004 and April 2021 was performed. Outcomes from the two surgical techniques were compared via univariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Forty-nine IVC-Ligation and six IVC-Reconstruction surgeries were identified. There were no differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, complication rates, postoperative morbidity, or overall 5-year survival between groups. IVC-Reconstruction patients were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (83% vs. 33%; p = 0.0257) and the IVC-Ligation cohort had a tendency to present with nondebilitating postoperative lymphedema (35% vs. 0%; p = 0.1615), which resolved for most patients. CONCLUSIONS: IVC-Ligation is a viable surgical option for select patients presenting with retroperitoneal tumors with IVC involvement and provides acceptable short- and medium-term outcomes.

Complex filter removal using forceps from combined transfemoral and transjugular approach unhooking the filter apex using forceps and dual access: Two case reports.

Modern inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are intended to be retrieved once a thrombotic process or risk of pulmonary embolism has resolved independent of administration of anticoagulation. IVCF removal can be challenging with the risk of complications including venous perforation, filter migration, and device fracture. IVCF removal has been described using the nomenclature of routine versus advanced retrieval. Routine retrieval is defined as accessing the filter hook with a loop snare device before advancing a sheath over the filter. Advanced retrieval techniques are employed when routine retrieval fails and can refer to a variety of approaches, including filter realignment with loop snare, stiff wire-displacement, use of a wire and snare with dual access, angioplasty balloon advanced over a guidewire, single access sling approach, the sandwich technique, the endobronchial forceps dissection and removal, photothermic ablation with excimer laser, and the filter eversion technique among others. Successful routine retrieval of IVCF has been reported at 74% and IVCF retrieval with advanced techniques has a success rate of nearly 95%. The complication rate with advanced techniques is higher when compared with routine techniques (5.3% vs. 0.4%; p < .05) and, as expected, requires fluoroscopic time. We report two cases of advanced filter retrieval using endobronchial forceps simultaneously or sequentially through the transfemoral and trans-jugular approach.

Cost-effectiveness of early placement of vena cava filters to prevent symptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients with contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulant.

INTRODUCTION: Vena cava filters have been used as a primary means to prevent symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) in trauma patients who cannot be anticoagulated after severe injury, but the economic implications for this practice remain unclear. METHODS: Using a healthcare system perspective to analyze the a priori primary outcome of the da Vinci trial, we report the cost-effectiveness of using vena cava filters as a primary means to prevent PE in patients who have contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation after major trauma. RESULTS: Of the 240 patients enrolled, complete, prospectively collected, hospital cost data during the entire hospital stay - including costs for the filter, medical/nursing/allied health staff, medical supplies, pathology tests, and radiological imaging - were available in 223 patients (93%). Patients allocated to the filter group (n = 114) were associated with a reduced risk of PE (0.9%) compared to those in the control group (n = 109, 5.5%; p = 0.048); and the filter's benefit was more pronounced among those who could not be anticoagulated within 7 days (filter: 0% vs control: 16%, Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.02). Overall, the cost needed to prevent one PE was high (AUD $379,760), but among those who could not be anticoagulated within 7 days, the costs to prevent one PE (AUD $36,156; ~ USD $26,032) and gain one quality-adjusted life-year (AUD $30,903; ~ USD $22,250) were substantially lower. CONCLUSION: The cost of using a vena cava filter to prevent PE for those who have contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation within 3 days of injury is prohibitive, unless such contraindications remain for longer than 7 days. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no.: ACTRN12614000963628).

An Informatics Approach to Facilitate Clinical Management of Patients With Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

OBJECTIVE: Long indwelling times for inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that are used to prevent venous thromboembolism can result in complications. To improve care for patients receiving retrievable IVC filters, we developed and evaluated an informatics-based initiative to facilitate patient tracking, clinical decision-making, and care coordination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A semiautomated filter-tracking application was custom-built to query our radiology information system to extract and transfer key data elements related to IVC filter insertion procedures into a database. A web-based interface displayed key information and facilitated communication between the interventional radiology clinical team and referring physicians. A set of filter management options was provided depending on each patient's clinical condition. The system was launched in April 2016. Using retrospective observational cohort methods, we compared filter retrieval rates during a test period from July through December 2016 with a control period of the same 6 months in 2015. RESULTS: System development required approximately 100 hours of development time. Two hundred ninety-three IVC filter placements and 83 filter retrievals were tracked during the study periods. The overall filter retrieval rate was 23% in the control period and 34% in the test period. Mean times from filter placement to retrieval in the control and test periods were not significantly different (88.9 and 102.7 days, respectively; p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: A semiautomated approach to tracking patients with IVC filters can facilitate care coordination and clinical decision-making for a device with known potential complications. Similar applications designed to improve provider communication and documentation of filter management plans, including appropriateness for retrieval, can be replicated.

Hospitalization metrics associated with hospital-level variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization for patients with venous thromboembolism in the United States: Implications for quality of care.

Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) across hospitals has been observed, suggesting differences in quality of care. Hospitalization metrics associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients have not been compared based on IVCF utilization rates using a national sample. We conducted a descriptive retrospective study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to delineate the variability of hospitalization metrics across the hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization for VTE patients. The NRD included all-payer administrative inpatient records drawn from 22 states. Adult (≥ 18 years) patients with VTE hospitalizations with or without IVCF were identified from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 and hospitals were divided into quartiles based on the IVCF utilization rate as a proportion of VTE patients. Primary outcome measures were observed rates of in-hospital mortality, 30-day all-cause readmissions and VTE-related readmissions, cost, and length of stay. Patient case-mix characteristics and hospital-level factors by hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization rates, were compared. Overall, 12.29% of VTE patients had IVCF placement, with IVCF utilization ranging from 0% to 46.84%. The highest quartile had fewer pulmonary embolism patients relative to deep vein thrombosis patients, and older patient ages were present in higher quartiles. The highest quartile of hospitals placing IVCFs were more often private, for-profit, and non-teaching. Patient and hospital characteristics and hospitalization metrics varied by IVCF utilization rates, but hospitalization outcomes for non-IVCF patients varied most between quartiles. Future work investigating the implications of IVCF utilization rates as a measure of quality of care for VTE patients is needed.

A multidisciplinary quality improvement program increases the inferior vena cava filter retrieval rate.

Published reports indicate low retrieval rates for retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. We performed a historic-controlled study of a 5-year intervention (March 2007 to February 2012) to improve IVC filter retrieval rates at a university medical center serving a rural area. All adults with a retrievable filter placed were included, except those with a life expectancy <6 months. The intervention included initial verbal counseling and printed educational materials, correspondence after discharge, and a hematology consultation. The control group included patients with retrievable filters placed in the 15 months preceding study initiation. In the control group, 116 filters were placed and 27 (23%) were removed, compared to 378 filters placed and 169 (45%) removed during the intervention. Adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratio of retrieval during the intervention was 3.03 (95% CI 1.85-4.27) compared to the control period. An intervention including patient education and hematology follow-up appeared to significantly improve IVC filter retrieval rates.

Practice patterns of retrievable inferior vena cava filters and predictors of filter retrieval in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are increasingly used in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who have contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. However, previous studies have shown that many retrievable filters are left permanently in patients. This study aimed to identify the common indications for IVC filter insertion, the filter retrieval rate, and the predictive factors for filter retrieval attempts. To this end, a retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary care center in South Korea between January 2010 and May 2016. Electronic medical charts were reviewed for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) who underwent IVC filter insertion. A total of 439 cases were reviewed. The most common indication for filter insertion was a preoperative/procedural aim, followed by extensive iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Retrieval of the IVC filter was attempted in 44.9% of patients. The retrieval success rate was 93.9%. History of cerebral hemorrhage, malignancy, and admission to a nonsurgical department were the significant predictive factors of a lower retrieval attempt rate in multivariate analysis. With the increased use of IVC filters, more issues should be addressed before placing a filter and physicians should attempt to improve the filter retrieval rate.

Value of blood flow velocity on color Doppler ultrasonography for optimization of delay in scanning time on computed tomography venography in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and inferior vena cava obstruction.

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the value of blood flow velocity in the inferior vena cava (IVC) on color Doppler ultrasonography for the optimization of the delay in scanning time after contrast injection during computed tomography (CT) venography in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) with IVC obstruction. METHODS: We enrolled 122 consecutive BCS patients with IVC obstruction. All patients underwent color Doppler ultrasonography, CT venography, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in that order prior to treatment. The delay in scanning time during CT venography was set at 120, 180, 240, and 300 s after contrast injection. The correlation between delay in CT scanning and IVC blood flow velocity on color Doppler ultrasonography was explored. Image quality was classified as good, moderate, or poor. Patients with good CT image quality were considered to have an optimal delay in scanning time. RESULTS: Delays in scanning time of 120, 180, 240, and 300 s yielded good-quality images in 2, 7, 49, and 64 patients, respectively. The corresponding IVC blood flow velocities in these patients were 16.10 ± 0.42 cm/s (range 15.8-16.4 cm/s), 12.90 ± 1.58 cm/s (range, 11-15 cm/s), 7.53 ± 1.35 cm/s (range 5-10 cm/s), and 1.95 ± 1.75 cm/s (range 0-5.5 cm/s). CONCLUSION: IVC blood flow velocity on color Doppler ultrasonography could serve as a useful tool for the optimization of the delay in scanning time during CT venography to ensure good-quality images for the diagnosis of BCS with IVC obstruction.

Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of patients with inferior vena cava partial obstruction in Budd-Chiari syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis of the partially obstructed inferior vena cava (IVC) in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients has received little attention. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for patients with BCS and a partially obstructed IVC. METHODS: A total of 329 patients with BCS and an obstructed IVC were endovascularly treated with balloon dilation and/or stent placement. All patients underwent a CTA examination prior to endovascular treatment, and the data were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of a round, oval, irregular shape or jet sign low-density area without enhancement within the enhanced proximal IVC was considered a sign of a partially obstructed IVC. Digital subtraction angiography was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The results from the digital subtraction angiography revealed a partially obstructed IVC in 108 BCS patients and a complete obstruction in 221 patients. The CTA discovered a partially obstructed IVC in 99 patients and a completely obstructed IVC in 230 patients. From the CTA results, 15 were false negatives, and six were false positives. The patient-based evaluation yielded an accuracy of 93.6%, a sensitivity of 86.1%, specificity of 97.3%, positive predictive value of 93.9%, and negative predictive value of 93.5% for the detection of BCS patients with a partial IVC obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomographic angiography offered a high diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in BCS patients with a partially obstructed IVC. The low-density area within the enhanced proximal IVC above the membrane in artery phase can be considered a reliable indicator of a stenotic IVC in BCS patients.

Thoracic venous injuries: an imaging and management overview.

Thoracic venous injuries are predominantly attributed to traumatic and iatrogenic causes. Gunshot wounds and knife stabbings make up the vast majority of penetrating trauma whereas motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of blunt trauma to the chest. Iatrogenic injuries, mostly from central venous catheter complications are being described in growing detail. Although these injuries are rare, they pose a diagnostic challenge as their clinical presentation does not substantially differ from that of arterial injury. Furthermore, the highly lethal nature of some of these injuries provides limited literature for review and probably underestimates their true incidence. The widespread use of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has increased the detection rate of these lesions in hemodynamically stable patients that survive the initial traumatic event. In this article, we will discuss and illustrate various causes of injury to each vein and their supporting CT findings while briefly discussing management. The available literature will be reviewed for penetrating, blunt, and iatrogenic injuries to the vena cava, innominate, subclavian, axillary, azygos, and pulmonary veins.

Efficacy and safety of a novel vena cava filter on pulmonary embolism prophylaxis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel, positive-controlled, noninferiority clinical trial.

Background: There are different types of vena cava filter (VCF) available in clinical practice. However, limited data exist to determine whether one type is superior to another, and no single VCF is universally recommended in clinical guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel VCF, Octoparms, for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) and to compare it with the Celect filter. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel, positive-controlled, noninferiority trial was conducted in 10 centers across 6 provinces in China from October 2017 to March 2019. Patients who had confirmed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or PE or who were at risk of PE with a clinical indication for VCF placement due to contraindication to or failure of anticoagulant therapy were included in the trial. The sample size for this trial was based on the assumption that the clinical success rate would be 95% and the noninferiority margin would be 10% for both filters. Each patient underwent baseline testing and was randomized using a web-based central system. Any additional interventions or standard treatments patients received along with the VCF placement were recorded. The primary endpoint was the overall clinical success rate, including technical and clinical success of filter placement and retrieval. The secondary endpoint was the safety of filter placement and retrieval, encompassing procedure-related and filter-related complications. Results: A total of 188 patients were included and were divided into two groups: the Octoparms group (n=94) and the Celect group (n=94). Baseline characteristics and demographics were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Technical and clinical success rates for filter placement were achieved in 100% (188/188) of patients. The median dwelling time was 12.0 days (range, 4-190 days). Ten VCFs were left in situ as permanent devices. Of the remaining 178 patients, technical success and clinical success rates for filter retrieval were both achieved in 100% of cases (178/178). Clinical success rates were 92.6% (87/94) for the Octoparms group and 96.8% (91/94) for the Celect group, with a difference of -4.2% (hazard ratio 2.441, 95% confidence interval 0.612-9.741; P=0.206). The lower limit was greater than the noninferiority margin of -10%. Eight patients experienced a total of eight procedure-related complications. No filter-related complications, such as migration, deformation, inferior vena cava (IVC) penetration, peripheral organ damage, or IVC stenosis/occlusion, were observed (P>0.05). Conclusions: The Octoparms filter exhibited a high rate of clinical success and a low rate of complications during placement and retrieval, demonstrating noninferiority to the Celect filter.

Resection and reconstruction of the largest abdominal vein system (the inferior vena cava, hepatic, and portal vein): a narrative review.

Background and Objective: As tumors invade major abdominal veins, surgical procedures are transformed from simple and basic to complicated and challenging. In this narrative review, we focus on what is currently known and not known regarding the technical aspects of major abdominal venous resection and its reconstruction, patency, and oncologic benefit in a cross-cutting perspective. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Semantic Scholar from inception up to October 18, 2023. We reviewed 106 papers by title, abstract, and full text regarding resection or reconstruction of the inferior vena cava, hepatic vein confluence, portal vein (PV), and middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a cross-cutting perspective. Key Content and Findings: The oncologic benefit of aggressive hepatic vein resection with suitable reconstruction against adenocarcinoma remains unclear, and further studies are required to clarify this point. A superior mesenteric/PV resection is now a universal, indispensable, and effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although many case series using tailor-made autologous venous grafts have been reported, not only size mismatch but also additional surgical incisions and a longer operation time remain obstacles for venous reconstruction. The use of autologous alternative tissue remains only an alternative procedure because the patency rate of customized tubular conduit type to interpose or replace the resected vein is not known. Unlike arterial replacement, venous replacement using synthetic vascular grafts is still rarely reported and there are several inherent limitations except for reconstruction of tributaries of MHV in LDLT. Conclusions: Various approaches to abdominal vein resection and replacement or reconstruction are technically feasible with satisfactory results. Synthetic vascular grafts may be appropriate but have a certain rate of complications.

Management of PFO in paradoxical embolic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion: a case report.

A paradoxical embolism is defined as a venous thrombus that crosses through a heart defect, into the systemic circulation, usually through a patent foramen ovale. Treatment varies between closure of patent foramen ovale vs. medical management based on a variety of individual risk factors and the cardiac defect's characteristics. We describe a case of paradoxical stroke complicated by hemorrhagic conversion, ultimately requiring an IVC filter.

Triple IVC: a combination of periureteral venous ring and left IVC.

Variations of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are clinically silent and most often diagnosed incidentally when imaging for other reasons. However, they may have significant clinical implications during retroperitoneal surgery, venous intervention, or differential imaging diagnosis. This article describes a case of triple IVC, discovered on a lumbar CT and MRI scan during an evaluation of back pain.