European Study of Cerebral Aspergillosis treated with Isavuconazole: an EFISG study.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to ECIL-6 and ESCMID guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA. METHODS: We conducted a European multi-centre retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes to those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study. RESULTS: Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) undergone neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed a comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first line treatment. CONCLUSION: Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole.

Effect of isavuconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a newly developed multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has become a common therapeutic option for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Examining the mechanism underlying the interaction between sunitinib and isavuconazole was the aim of this effort. METHODS: The concentrations of sunitinib and its primary metabolite, N-desethyl sunitinib, were analyzed and quantified using ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Our study evaluated the potential interaction between isavuconazole and sunitinib using rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM), and in vivo rat models. For the in vivo study, two groups (n = 5) of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly allocated to receive sunitinib either with or without co-administration of isavuconazole. Additionally, the effects of isavuconazole on the metabolic stability of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib were studied in RLM in vitro. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that in RLM, isavuconazole exhibited a mixed non-competitive and competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) value of 1.33 µM. Meanwhile, in HLM, isavuconazole demonstrated a competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 of 5.30 µM. In vivo studies showed that the presence of isavuconazole significantly increased the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sunitinib, with the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and Tmax rising to approximately 211.38%, 203.92%, and 288.89%, respectively, in contrast to the control group (5 mg/kg sunitinib alone). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in the presence of isavuconazole remained largely unchanged compared to the control group. Furthermore, in vitro metabolic stability experiments revealed that isavuconazole inhibited the metabolic processing of both sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole had a major impact on sunitinib metabolism, providing fundamental information for the precise therapeutic administration of sunitinib.

Difference in immunosuppressant dose requirement when transitioning to isavuconazole from other azoles in thoracic transplant recipients.

The triazole antifungal isavuconazole (ISAVU) is used for prevention and treatment of fungal infections in solid organ transplant (SOT). SOT recipients commonly need to transition from one azole to another due to breakthrough infection, toxicity, or other reasons. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of ISAVU on immunosuppressant concentrations in thoracic transplant recipients when ISAVU was started de novo or transitioned from another azole. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including 68 patients (51 lung, 14 heart, and 3 heart/lung transplant). Concentration to dosage ratios (C/D) of immunosuppressants were assessed at baseline, day 3, and weekly for 9 weeks. When starting ISAVU de novo, we observed a temporary doubling of tacrolimus exposure. Cyclosporine and sirolimus required dose decreases. Tacrolimus C/D increased by 110% at day 3 in patients started on ISAVU de novo then returned to baseline C/D ± 17% weeks 2-9 (n = 8). One cyclosporine patient started on ISAVU de novo had variable C/D, and C/D increased by 219% ± 72% in 2 sirolimus patients. When transitioning from other azoles, tacrolimus and cyclosporine required about twice the initial dose. After week 1, tacrolimus C/D decreased by 53% ± 6% in patients transitioned from posaconazole (n = 33), voriconazole (n = 14), or fluconazole (n = 2). Cyclosporine C/D decreased by 45% ± 16% in patients transitioning from other azoles (posaconazole [n = 2], voriconazole [n = 2], fluconazole [n = 1]). Sirolimus C/D decreased by 73% ± 13% in patients transitioned from posaconazole (n = 7). Aside from the initial loading phase, ISAVU had a lesser degree of interaction with immunosuppressants than other azoles in loading phase, ISAVU had a lesser degree of interaction with immunosuppressants than other azoles in adjustments for the 4-week period after initiating antifungal therapy with ISAVU or switching from another agent.

Effect of letermovir initiation on tacrolimus concentrations among lung transplant recipients receiving concomitant azole antifungal prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The antiviral letermovir has been increasingly used as off-label cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. Observational studies have reported notable increases in tacrolimus (FK) exposure following letermovir; however, whether a significant interaction occurs in the setting of existing moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibition is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate FK trough changes before and after letermovir among lung transplant recipients receiving azole antifungal prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included lung transplant recipients newly initiated on letermovir between 2019-2022 following valganciclovir intolerance. Tacrolimus doses and concentrations were collected up to 30 days before and after the letermovir start date. No pre-emptive FK dose adjustments occurred prior to letermovir initiation. Patients admitted to the hospital or lacking an appropriately timed trough in the pre- or post-period were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 78 lung transplant recipients receiving FK (1.5 mg median total daily dose) and itraconazole (56.4%), isavuconazole (25.6%) or posaconazole (17.9%) prophylaxis were included. Letermovir was started at a median of 8.4 months post-transplant. The pre-/post-letermovir median FK trough was 9.6/9.0 ng/mL (p = .151), median dose-corrected trough was 4.2/4.7 ng/mL/mg (+11.9%, p = .032), and median weight-based dose-corrected trough was 362/326 [ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day] (-9.9%, p = .036). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients within their goal trough range before and after letermovir initiation (62% vs. 72%, p = .229). CONCLUSION: Empiric FK dose adjustments do not appear warranted before letermovir initiation in lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Successful Isavuconazole Treatment for Pulmonary Mucormycosis in a Patient Intolerant to Liposomal Amphotericin B with Pharmacokinetic Insights: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Mucormycosis presents a diagnostic challenge characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates due to its swift and pervasive nature, which leads to extensive tissue destruction and dissemination. Immunocompromised individuals, notably those with hematological malignancies, are at a heightened risk. First-line antifungal agents include liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), posaconazole, and isavuconazole (IVZ), which offer advantages, such as minimal drug interactions and a favorable safety profile. However, the necessity and efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of IVZ remain unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a successful case of IVZ therapy in a patient who was intolerant of L-AMB, highlighting the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of IVZ in treating pulmonary mucormycosis. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed steady plasma IVZ concentrations, emphasizing the importance of monitoring IVZ levels, particularly in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the efficacy of IVZ therapy for mucormycosis and the potential utility of TDM in a specific patient population. Further research is needed to elucidate the optimal IVZ dosing and monitoring strategies to ensure safe and efficacious treatment.

Effectiveness of isavuconazole in invasive cerebral aspergillosis during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a pediatric patient with myelodysplastic syndrome: A case report.

Pediatric myelodysplasia syndrome is often characterized by hypoplastic bone marrow morphology and predisposition to infection. Invasive aspergillosis during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation poses a significant threat and often requires voriconazole (VRCZ) therapy. However, difficulties in achieving appropriate VRCZ blood levels due to drug interactions have prompted the exploration of alternative treatments, such as isavuconazole (ISCZ). We present the case of a 4-year-old boy with myelodysplasia syndrome who developed multiple abscesses, including a brain abscess caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, and was successfully treated with ISCZ. Despite initial treatment with liposomal amphotericin B and VRCZ, the patient's condition deteriorated. Transitioning to ISCZ treatment resulted in significant clinical improvement, resolution of the abscesses, and reduced antigen levels. Although ISCZ induced hepatic enzyme elevation, supportive care improved without discontinuation of treatment. This case highlights the potential of ISCZ in cases of pediatric invasive aspergillosis where traditional therapies fail, underscoring the need for further research and formulation development to optimize its use in this population. As more cases accumulate, ISCZ may become a promising option for treating severe invasive aspergillosis in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Usage of Antifungal Agents in Pediatric Patients Versus Adults: Knowledge and Gaps.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) present significant challenges in managing hospitalized and immunocompromised pediatric patients, contributing to high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in diagnostics and treatment, outcomes remain suboptimal due to unique clinical epidemiology, lack of pediatric-specific trials, and varied pharmacokinetics. The emergence of new antifungal classes and agents has expanded our options for preventing and treating IFIs in children, enhancing the safety and effectiveness of antifungal therapy. The oral formulations of ibrexafungerp, fosmanogepix and olorofim along with the extended dosing intervals of rezafungin show promising features for effective antifungal treatment in pediatrics. Despite the promising potential of novel antifungal drugs, their performance in heavily immunosuppressed patients remains unstudied. Until then, dedicated antifungal stewardship programs for high-risk patients are essential to optimize therapeutic outcomes, improve patient care, and limit the emergence of resistance.

Bronchopulmonary penetration of isavuconazole in lung transplant recipients.

Isavuconazole's (ISA) pharmacokinetics was studied among lung transplant recipients to evaluate its bronchopulmonary penetration. This study included 13 patients and showed mean serum concentrations of 3.30 (standard deviation [SD] 0.45), 5.12 (SD 1.36), and 6.31 (SD 0.95) at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h respectively. Mean concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid were 0.969 (SD 0.895), 2.141 (SD 1.265), and 2.812 (SD 0.693) at the same time points. ISA is a drug with a tolerable safety profile that achieves adequate concentrations in the lung.

Isavuconazole use and TDM in real-world pediatric practice.

Isavuconazole (ISA) is approved for treating invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults, but its use in children remains off-label. We report on the use of ISA in real-world pediatric practice with 15 patients receiving ISA for treatment of invasive fungal infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed in all patients, with 52/111 (46.8%) Ctrough determinations out of range, thus supporting the need for TDM in children, especially those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

A Hybrid Algorithm Combining Population Pharmacokinetic and Machine Learning for Isavuconazole Exposure Prediction.

OBJECTIVES: Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) based on a limited sampling strategy and a population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model is used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Recently, we proposed a methodology that combined population pharmacokinetic and machine learning (ML) to decrease the bias and imprecision in individual iohexol clearance prediction. The aim of this study was to confirm the previous results by developing a hybrid algorithm combining POPPK, MAP-BE and ML that accurately predicts isavuconazole clearance. METHODS: A total of 1727 isavuconazole rich PK profiles were simulated using a POPPK model from the literature, and MAP-BE was used to estimate the clearance based on: (i) the full PK profiles (refCL); and (ii) C24h only (C24h-CL). Xgboost was trained to correct the error between refCL and C24h-CL in the training dataset (75%). C24h-CL as well as ML-corrected C24h-CL were evaluated in a testing dataset (25%) and then in a set of PK profiles simulated using another published POPPK model. RESULTS: A strong decrease in mean predictive error (MPE%), imprecision (RMSE%) and the number of profiles outside ± 20% MPE% (n-out20%) was observed with the hybrid algorithm (decreased in MPE% by 95.8% and 85.6%; RMSE% by 69.5% and 69.0%; n-out20% by 97.4% and 100% in the training and testing sets, respectively. In the external validation set, the hybrid algorithm decreased MPE% by 96%, RMSE% by 68% and n-out20% by 100%. CONCLUSION: The hybrid model proposed significantly improved isavuconazole AUC estimation over MAP-BE based on the sole C24h and may improve dose adjustment.

Amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole MICs against clinical Mucorales isolates obtained by visual inspection and spectrophotometric reading according to the EUCAST 9.4 procedure.

We compared the antifungal susceptibility of 92 Mucorales isolates obtained by visual inspection and spectrophotometric readings following EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) testing. Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were up to 1 mg/l against most isolates and variable among species, except for Cunninghamella bertholletiae. Posaconazole MICs against most isolates were up to 1 mg/l and high against Mucor circinelloides, some Rhizopus arrhizus, and Rhizopus microsporus. Isavuconazole MICs ranged between 1 and 8 mg/l but were invariably >8 mg/l against M. circinelloides and C. bertholletiae. The agreement between MICs obtained by visual endpoint or spectrophotometric readings was moderate and higher when using the ≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoint.

The agreement between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained by visual inspection or spectrophotometric readings was moderate and higher when the ≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoint was chosen. Isavuconazole presented higher MICs than posaconazole, regardless of the inhibition endpoint used.

Context of instauration and evolution under isavuconazole, a 2-year prospective real-life study.

To describe reasons for initiation and evolution under isavuconazole (ISZ), a 2-year prospective and observational study was performed. Anonymized data collected during the first 3 months of treatment were indications of treatment, efficacy, overall survival (OS), evolution of toxicity markers, and ISZ trough levels. Fifty-one (26 invasive aspergillosis, 16 prophylaxis, and 9 mucormycosis) patients started on isavuconazole. Isavuconazole was initiated upfront in 12/51 cases, especially to avoid toxicities from other antifungals. As second-line therapy (39/51 patients), isavuconazole was mostly initiated after toxicities of the previous treatments (66.7%; 26/39 cases). An improvement in toxicity markers was reported in most patients. However, five patients experienced adverse events. The mean ISZ trough levels measured from 179 samples collected in 37 patients was 3.33 ± 1.64 mg/l. The mean ISZ through levels was significantly lower (P = .003) in alloHSCT recipients (3.10 ± 1.45 mg/l) than in other patients (3.76 ± 1.88 mg/l) but still within the expected range of efficacy. After 12 weeks, the OS was 69.2% (n = 18/26) in the invasive aspergillosis intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 44.4% (n = 4/9) in the mucormycosis ITT group. After 2 years, the OS was respectively 46.2% (n = 12/26) and 33.3% (n = 3/9) in these two groups.

Isavuconazole is commonly prescribed as second-line therapy after the toxicity of a previous treatment. In most cases, an improvement is reported. The well tolerability of isavuconazole was associated with correct blood levels, even in alloHSCT recipients.

Observed isavuconazole exposure: 5-year experience of azole TDM from a Spanish reference laboratory.

We aimed to assess patient exposure to isavuconazole (ISZ) from samples received in our laboratory for therapeutic antifungal monitoring. We used liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet (UV) absorbance detection adapted from a multiplex-validated method with photodiode array (PDA) detection to monitor the analytes. The latter device allows the characterization of the azoles UV spectra. The method was validated according to international guidelines for efficient ISZ monitoring. The assay exhibited linearity between 0.25 and 16 mg/l for ISZ. Accuracy and intra- and inter-day precision were within acceptable ranges, and the method was successfully applied to quantify azoles and major metabolites from clinical samples collected from treated patients. We focus on ISZ blood concentrations and compared them to those of voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole for a period of 5 years (2017-2021). Median ISZ concentration was 2.92 mg/l (interquartile range 1.82-5.33 mg/l) with 89% of measurements classified as adequate exposure (> 1 mg/l). Additionally, 71% of samples reach concentration values > 2 mg/l. Different ISZ exposure between adults to children were found. In conclusion, ISZ achieves excellent blood concentrations compared to other azole drugs, they are almost identical to those previously described, they exceed the MICs of most fungi for which its use was recommended and they differ depending on the patient's age. The method we describe for antifungal monitoring is simple, robust, and efficient. It simultaneously analyzes azoles and metabolites, and can be used for tailored interventions, achieve exposures associated with therapeutic success, decrease treatment-related toxicity, and help prevent resistance emergence due to continuous azole sub-optimal concentrations.

Optimizing azole therapy is a challenge in clinical practice, for which therapeutic drug monitoring is of great value to assess exposure, especially by using valid methodologies. Isavuconazole reaches good blood concentrations, but moderate intra-patient variability and different exposure according to the patient's age were found.

Isavuconazole for Treating Invasive Mould Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a higher risk of developing invasive mould diseases (IMD). Isavuconazole is a novel broad-spectrum azole active against Aspergillus spp. and Mucor, well tolerated, with an excellent bioavailability and predictable pharmacokinetics, that penetrates in most tissues rapidly, and has few serious adverse effects, including hepatic toxicity. Contrary to other broad-spectrum azoles, such as voriconazole and posaconazole, isavuconazole appears to show significant smaller drug-drug interactions with anticalcineurin drugs. We have performed an extensive literature review of the experience with the use of isavuconazole in SOT, which included the SOTIS and the ISASOT studies, and published case reports. More than 140 SOT recipients treated with isavuconazole for IMD were included. Most patients were lung and kidney recipients treated for an Aspergillus infection. Isavuconazole was well tolerated (less than 10% of patients required treatment discontinuation). The clinical responses appeared comparable to that found in other high-risk patient populations. Drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive agents were manageable after the reduction of tacrolimus and the adjustment of mTOR inhibitors at the beginning of treatment. In conclusion, isavuconazole appears to be a reasonable option for the treatment of IMD in SOT. More clinical studies are warranted.

Breakthrough invasive fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis in hematologic malignancy & hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole (ISA) is a newer antifungal used in patients with history of hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic transplant and cellular therapies (HM/TCT). Although it has a more favorable side-effect profile, breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) while on ISA have been reported. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study evaluating HM/TCT patients who received prophylactic ISA for ≥7 days, we evaluated the incidence and potential risk factors for bIFIs. RESULTS: We evaluated 106 patients who received prophylactic ISA. The patients were predominantly male (60.4%) with median age of 65 (range: 21-91) years. Acute myeloid leukemia (48/106, 45.3%) was the most common HM, with majority having relapsed and/or refractory disease (43/106, 40.6%) or receiving ongoing therapy (38/106, 35.8%). Nineteen patients (17.9%) developed bIFIs-nine proven [Fusarium (3), Candida (2), Mucorales plus Aspergillus (2), Mucorales (1), Colletotrichum (1)], four probable invasive pulmonary Aspergillus, and six possible infections. Twelve patients were neutropenic for a median of 28 (8-253) days prior to bIFI diagnosis. ISA levels checked within 7 days of bIFI diagnosis (median: 3.65 µg/mL) were comparable to industry-sponsored clinical trials. All-cause mortality among the bIFI cases was 47.4% (9/19).We also noted clinically significant cytomegalovirus co-infection in 5.3% (1/19). On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities and potential risk factors between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ISA prophylaxis was associated with a significant cumulative incidence of bIFIs. Despite the appealing side-effect and drug-interaction profile of ISA, clinicians must be vigilant about the potential risk for bIFIs.

Incidence of breakthrough fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis compared to posaconazole and voriconazole.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a common infectious complication during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For these patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends posaconazole or voriconazole for IFI prophylaxis. In clinical practice, however, there has been increased use of isavuconazole due to favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters despite limited data for this indication. The comparative prophylactic efficacy of antifungals in this patient population has not been reported, and an analysis is warranted. METHODS: This retrospective, matched cohort, single-center study, included AML, MDS, or HCT patients who began treatment or underwent transplant between January 1, 2015 and July 31, 2021. Isavuconazole patients were matched 1:2 with patients receiving posaconazole or voriconazole prophylaxis. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included, 42 received isavuconazole, 81 received posaconazole, and three received voriconazole. The majority of patients were male receiving secondary IFI prophylaxis while receiving steroids for treatment of GVHD. The incidence of possible, probable or proven IFI was 16.7% in the isavuconazole group compared to 10.7% in the posaconazole and voriconazole group (OR 1.28, 95% CI -0.9-1.4; p = .67). Hepatotoxicity occurred in 16 total patients, 14 receiving posaconazole and two receiving isavuconazole. CONCLUSION: Patients who received isavuconazole prophylaxis during AML induction therapy or post-HCT experienced a similar incidence of breakthrough fungal infections compared to those who received posaconazole or voriconazole. These results suggest no difference in antifungal prophylactic efficacy; however larger prospective comparative studies are needed.

An extensive review on antifungal approaches in the treatment of mucormycosis.

During the period of COVID-19, the occurrences of mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients have increased significantly. Mucormycosis (black fungus) is a rare and rapidly progressing fungal infection associated with high mortality and morbidity in India as well as globally. The causative agents for this infection are collectively called mucoromycetes which are the members of the order Mucorales. The diagnosis of the infection needs to be performed as soon as the occurrence of clinical symptoms which differs with types of Mucorales infection. Imaging techniques magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan, culture testing, and microscopy are the approaches for the diagnosis. After the diagnosis of the infection is confirmed, rapid action is needed for the treatment in the form of antifungal therapy or surgery depending upon the severity of the infection. Delaying in treatment declines the chances of survival. In antifungal therapy, there are two approaches first-line therapy (monotherapy) and combination therapy. Amphotericin B (1) and isavuconazole (2) are the drugs of choice for first-line therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis. Salvage therapy with posaconazole (3) and deferasirox (4) is another approach for patients who are not responsible for any other therapy. Adjunctive therapy is also used in the treatment of mucormycosis along with first-line therapy, which involves hyperbaric oxygen and cytokine therapy. There are some drugs like VT-1161 (5) and APX001A (6), Colistin, SCH 42427, and PC1244 that are under clinical trials. Despite all these approaches, none can be 100% successful in giving results. Therefore, new medications with favorable or little side effects are required for the treatment of mucormycosis.

Efficacy and safety of isavuconazole against deep-seated mycoses: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Isavuconazole is a convenient triazole antifungal agent with a broad antifungal spectrum. A randomized, open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471988) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in Japanese patients with deep-seated mycoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Cohort A, patients with aspergillosis (chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and invasive aspergillosis) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to isavuconazole or voriconazole, and in Cohort B, patients with cryptococcosis and mucormycosis were assigned to isavuconazole for up to 84 days of treatment. The overall outcome was evaluated according to the clinical, radiological, and mycological responses at Days 42 and 84 and at the end of treatment (EOT). RESULTS: A total of 103 participants were enrolled and received the study drug. The overall response rate of patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in the isavuconazole (52 patients) and voriconazole (27 patients) groups was 82.7% and 77.8% at EOT, respectively. The response rate in patients with cryptococcosis (10 patients, isavuconazole group only) was 90.0%. One of three participants with invasive aspergillosis and one of three participants with mucormycosis responded in the isavuconazole group. In the safety evaluation, the incidence of adverse events in participants with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis was similar in both groups. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 32 (61.5%) patients receiving isavuconazole and 23 (85.2%) patients receiving voriconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole showed efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and cryptococcosis, for which the drug is not currently indicated.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole is a novel triazole antifungal agent. However, the previous outcomes were highlighted by statistical heterogeneity. This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) compared with other antifungal agents (amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazole). METHODS: Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and Ichushi databases were searched for relevant articles that met the inclusion criteria through February 2023. Mortality, IFI rate, discontinuation rate of antifungal therapy and incidence of abnormal hepatic function were evaluated. The discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events. The control group included patients who received other antifungal agents. RESULTS: Of the 1784 citations identified for screening, 10 studies with an overall total of 3037 patients enrolled. Isavuconazole was comparable with the control group in mortality and IFI rate in the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, respectively (mortality, odds rate (OR) 1.11, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.82-1.51; IFI rate, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.49-2.12). Isavuconazole significantly reduced the discontinuation rate in the treatment (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.07) and incidence of hepatic function abnormalities in the treatment and prophylaxis, compared with the control group (treatment, OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.41-3.78; prophylaxis, OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.31-10.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed that isavuconazole was not inferior to other antifungal agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, with substantially fewer drug-associated adverse events and discontinuations. Our findings support the use of isavuconazole as the primary treatment and prophylaxis for IFIs.

Clinical and demographic factors affecting trough levels of isavuconazole in critically ill patients with or without COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The broad-spectrum antifungal isavuconazole is administered to treat invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. OBJECTIVES: Isavuconazole plasma concentrations in critically ill ICU patients with or without COVID-19 and invasive fungal infection were determined, and factors for sub-therapeutic drug levels (<1 µg/mL) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Isavuconazole plasma levels were measured as part of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in ICUs of a tertiary hospital. Concentrations determined 20-28 h after previous dosing were defined as trough (Cmin ) levels. A total of 160 Cmin levels from 62 patients with invasive fungal infections were analysed, 30 of which suffering from COVID-19. Patient characteristics included into univariable and multivariable analyses were gender, age, COVID-19 status, body mass index (BMI), sepsis-related organ failure (SOFA) score, renal replacement therapy (RRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement. RESULTS: The mean Cmin of isavuconazole in all patients was 1.64 µg/mL (interquartile range 0.83-2.24 µg/mL, total range 0.24-5.67 µg/mL). In total, 34.4% of the Cmin values (corresponding to 46.8% of patients) were below a threshold concentration of 1 µg/mL. Drug concentrations between patients with or without COVID-19 did not differ (p = .43). In contrast, levels were significantly lower in patients with female sex (p = .0007), age ≤ 65 years (p = .002), BMI > 25 (p = .006), SOFA score > 12 (p = .026), RRT (p = .017) and ECMO requirement (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole plasma levels can be negatively affected by patients' risk factors, supportive renal replacement and ECMO therapy. Future prospective studies analysing the relevance of isavuconazole drug levels in ICU patient outcome are urgently needed.