Behavioural and neuropsychological outcomes in children exposed in utero to maternal labour epidural analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report conflicting results regarding the relationship between labour epidural analgesia (LEA) in mothers and neurodevelopmental disorders in their offspring. We evaluated behavioural and neuropsychological test scores in children of mothers who used LEA. METHODS: Children enrolled in the Raine Study from Western Australia and delivered vaginally from a singleton pregnancy between 1989 and 1992 were evaluated. Children exposed to LEA were compared with unexposed children. The primary outcome was the parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) reporting total, internalising, and externalising behavioural problem scores at age 10 yr. Score differences, an increased risk of clinical deficit, and a dose-response based on the duration of LEA exposure were assessed. Secondary outcomes included language, motor function, cognition, and autistic traits. RESULTS: Of 2180 children, 850 (39.0%) were exposed to LEA. After adjustment for covariates, exposed children had minimally increased CBCL total scores (+1.41 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 2.73; P=0.037), but not internalising (+1.13 points; 95% CI -0.08 to 2.34; P=0.066) or externalising (+1.08 points; 95% CI -0.08 to 2.24; P=0.068) subscale subscores. Increased risk of clinical deficit was not observed for any CBCL score. For secondary outcomes, score differences were inconsistently observed in motor function and cognition. Increased exposure duration was not associated with worse scores in any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although LEA exposure was associated with slightly higher total behavioural scores, there was no difference in subscores, increased risk of clinical deficits, or dose-response relationship. These results argue against LEA exposure being associated with consistent, clinically significant neurodevelopmental deficits in children.

Association of labour epidural analgesia with neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a Danish population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Whether labour epidural analgesia impacts risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring is unsettled, raising public and scientific concerns. We explored the association between maternal labour epidural analgesia and autism spectrum disorder, and specific developmental disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy in offspring. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study included 624 952 live-born singletons delivered by women who intended to deliver vaginally (i.e. vaginal and intrapartum Caesarean deliveries) in Denmark from 2005 to 2016. A total of 80 862 siblings discordant for exposure to labour epidural analgesia were analysed in a sibling-matched analysis. Both full-cohort and sibling-matched analyses were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of offspring risk of autism spectrum disorder, specific developmental disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy, according to exposure to labour epidural analgesia, adjusted for maternal socio-economic, pregnancy, and perinatal covariates. RESULTS: In the full cohort, maternal labour epidural analgesia was associated with autism spectrum disorder in offspring (HR 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18); however, in the sibling-matched analysis, no association with autism spectrum disorder was found (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.84-1.27). The association between labour epidural analgesia and specific developmental disorder (HR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.22) in the full cohort also disappeared in the sibling-matched analysis (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78-1.31). No association between maternal labour epidural analgesia and the remaining neurodevelopmental disorders was found overall (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.92-1.03; intellectual disability, HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.85-1.14; epilepsy, HR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.00) or in the sibling-matched analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not support an association between maternal attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, specific developmental disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, intellectual disability, or epilepsy.

Interventions for the prevention or treatment of epidural-related maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Epidural-related maternal fever in women in labour has consequences for the mother and neonate. There has been no systematic review of preventive strategies. METHODS: RCTs evaluating methods of preventing or treating epidural-related maternal fever in women in active labour were eligible. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources were searched from inception to April 2021. Two review authors independently undertook study selection. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed by a single author and checked by a second. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used. Meta-analyses for the primary outcome, incidence of intrapartum fever, were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to produce summary risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Forty-two records, representing 34 studies, were included. Methods of reduced dose epidural reduced the incidence of intrapartum fever, but this was not statistically significant when six trials at high risk of bias were removed (seven trials; 857 participants; RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.41-1.67). Alternative methods of analgesia and high-dose prophylactic systemic steroids reduced the risk of intrapartum fever compared with epidural analgesia. Prophylactic paracetamol was not effective. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence to support the use of any individual preventative or therapeutic intervention for epidural-related maternal fever. Further research should focus on understanding the mechanism of fever development to enable RCTs of potential interventions to reduce the incidence of intrapartum fever development and the subsequent disease burden felt by the neonate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021246929.

Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing.

PURPOSE: Assessment of sensory block level during labour epidural analgesia is an essential component of clinical practice and patient safety. Nevertheless, the methods and direction of testing are not standardized. In our hospital, sensory block testing to ice is routinely used, but while some anesthesiologists test the block from a nonanesthetized to an anesthetized area, some do it in the opposite direction. It is unknown how these two different practices affect identification of the sensory block level. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement between these two practices. METHODS: We enrolled 31 patients admitted to the labour and delivery unit in a prospective cohort study. At their request, labour epidural analgesia was performed as per institutional routine. Sensory block level to ice was assessed using opposite directions by two randomly assigned independent investigators, one and two hours after the loading dose was administered. RESULTS: Sensory block levels to ice assessed from an anesthetized area to a nonanesthetized area were lower than those when assessed with the stimulus applied in the opposite direction, typically one segment lower. DISCUSSION: Given the small difference detected with both methods, it may be acceptable to use either in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the lack of standardization may have a significant impact when comparing studies involving assessment of sensory block to ice. STUDY REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03572439); registered 28 June 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'évaluation du niveau de bloc sensoriel pendant l'analgésie péridurale obstétricale est une composante essentielle de la pratique clinique et de la sécurité des patientes. Néanmoins, les méthodes et l'orientation des tests ne sont pas standardisées. Dans notre hôpital, les tests à la glace des blocs sensoriels sont couramment utilisés, mais alors que certains anesthésiologistes testent le bloc d'une zone non anesthésiée à une zone anesthésiée, certains le font dans la direction opposée. Nous ne savons pas dans quelle mesure ces deux pratiques différentes affectent l'identification du niveau du bloc sensoriel. L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la concordance entre ces deux pratiques. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté 31 patientes admises à l'unité obstétricale dans une étude de cohorte prospective. À leur demande, l'analgésie péridurale obstétricale a été réalisée conformément à la routine institutionnelle. Le niveau du bloc sensoriel tel que mesuré par un test à la glace a été évalué dans les deux directions par deux chercheurs indépendants assignés au hasard, une et deux heures après l'administration de la dose de charge. RéSULTATS: Les niveaux de blocs sensoriels tels que mesurés par un test à la glace évalués d'une zone anesthésiée à une zone non anesthésiée étaient inférieurs à ceux évalués lorsque le stimulus était appliqué dans la direction opposée, habituellement un segment plus bas. DISCUSSION: Compte tenu de la petite différence détectée entre les deux méthodes, il peut être acceptable d'utiliser l'une ou l'autre dans la pratique clinique. Néanmoins, le manque de standardisation peut avoir un impact significatif lors de la comparaison d'études impliquant l'évaluation du bloc sensoriel à l'aide d'un test à la glace. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03572439); enregistrée le 28 juin 2018.

Application of ultrasound-guided epidural catheter indwelling in painless labour.

OBJECTIVE: To study the application of ultrasound-guided indwelling epidural catheter in painless labour. METHODS: A total of 300 single-foetus cephalic position and full-term primipara who did not implement labour analgesia under the same conditions were randomly selected. According to the principle of random grouping, 150 pregnant women who requested and signed the informed consent for labour analgesia were selected as the analgesic group (group A). The other 150 pregnant women who experienced natural delivery without any analgesic measures were categorised as the control group. In the analgesic group, epidural anaesthesia was used when the uterine orifice reached 2.5 cm. The pain grade, motor nerve block, uterine contraction, foetal heart rate and the time of the first stage of labuor were recorded. RESULTS: The results showed that the group receiving epidural block had lesser pain compared to the control group. The duration of first stage of labour of the analgesic group was significantly shorter than the group without analgesia.. There were no significant differences in the degree of motor nerve block, uterine contractions and foetal heart rate between the analgesic group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound-guided first stage indwelling epidural catheter had a significant effect in causing painless labour in the parturient.

Effective prevention of post-dural puncture headache with insertion of an intrathecal catheter in parturients: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accidental dural puncture is a common complication of labour analgesia. It can trigger post-dural puncture headache, with associated morbidity and increased costs. Intrathecal catheter placement is a prophylactic procedure which can reduce incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centred study to define incidence and risk factors of accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in an obstetric population. We also evaluated effectiveness of intrathecal catheter placement compared to epidural catheter replacement in reducing incidence of post-dural puncture headache. We then conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which included all studies comparing intrathecal catheter placement to epidural catheter replacement in obstetric patients with accidental dural puncture assessing the outcome of reduced incidence of post-dural puncture headache as a dichotomous variable. RESULTS: Accidental dural puncture had an incidence of 0.25% (60 cases). Of these, 66% developed post-dural puncture headache. A total of 77% (47/60) of patients with accidental dural puncture were treated with an intrathecal catheter placement, while 23% (13/60) had an epidural catheter replacement. Incidence of post-dural puncture headache was lower in the intrathecal catheter group (spinal 26/47, 60.5% epidural 11/13, 84.6%), although not reaching statistical significance (RR 0.71, CI 95%: 0.51-1.00; p = 0.049). The meta-analysis revealed that intrathecal catheter placement significantly reduced incidence of post-dural puncture headache compared to epidural catheter replacement (pooled RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal catheter placement is a promising measure to prevent post-dural puncture headache, especially if followed by a pain management protocol and a continuous saline infusion.

Horner's Syndrome Following Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia for Labor.

Horner's syndrome has been identified as an adverse outcome associated with the administration of epidural analgesia during labor. This syndrome is attributed to the upward spread of the local anesthetic, which may extend toward the superior cervical sympathetic chain. This process could disrupt the sympathetic pathways supplying the facial and ocular areas. We describe a case of a 26-year-old primigravid female with transient isolated Horner's syndrome following dural puncture epidural analgesia during labor.

Horner's Syndrome and Upper Limb Paresthesia During Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Case Report.

Horner's syndrome is a condition that results from sympathetic nervous system dysfunction. Labor epidural analgesia is known to be a rare cause of Horner's Syndrome. However, in the obstetric population, the incidence of Horner's Syndrome is higher than in the rest of the population as it is a consequence of high cephalad spread of local anesthetic (LA) probably enhanced by the anatmophysiologic changes of pregnancy. We present a case of unilateral Horner's syndrome as a complication of epidural analgesia with accompanying upper limb paresthesia and motor weakness, a rarely encountered symptom.

Intracranial subdural haematoma following dural puncture accidental: clinical case. / Hematoma subdural intracraneal tras punción dural accidental: caso clínico.

Intracranial subdural hematoma is a rare, but potentially lethal complication of neuraxial procedures. Considering the high frequency of neuraxial techniques in the obstetric population, parturients are more susceptible to this fearful complication. The diagnosis is often masked and delayed because it shares similar clinical characteristics with posdural puncture headache, with headache being the most common symptom. This case report describes a timely diagnosis and successful management of an intracranial subdural hematoma, after unintentional dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia. Postpartum headache following epidural analgesia, remains a clinical challenge for the caring team, requiring a close follow-up and awareness for non-benign causes that require prompt management, avoiding devastating consequences.

A Prospective Observational Study to Determine the Predictors of Increased Number of Attempts at Labour Epidural Placement.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple attempts at labour epidural placement result in patient discomfort and high incidence of complications. Identifying the factors that lead to more than one attempt would help anaesthesiologists prepare in advance such as getting expert help and additional equipment, patient counselling or planning alternative management. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted on 500 patients from July 2017 to June 2018 after obtaining approval from the institutional Ethics Review Committee. The study patients consisted of full-term parturient women who were admitted in the labour room suite of Aga Khan Hospital requesting for labour epidural and consented to participate in the study. A predesigned form was used to collect the following data: number of attempts at epidural insertion and factors such as patients' demographics, cervical dilatation, anatomical grading of spine according to visibility and palpation of spinous process and vertebral interspace, experience level of the anaesthesiologist, patient satisfaction and pain score during labour. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 28.11±4.02 years. The total number of epidural attempts varied between one and four; the median number of attempts was 1 [IQR=1-2]. Anatomical grade of the spine was the only factor that was significantly associated with more than one attempt at epidural insertion (p=0.0005). Patient satisfaction was negatively associated with the number of attempts (p=0.04), but mean pain difference at different time points during the course of labour was not statistically significant between patients with one attempt and those with more than one attempt. CONCLUSION: Determining the anatomical grade of the spine is the most reliable method for predicting a technically difficult neuraxial block that requires more than one attempt at epidural insertion.

Intrathecal catheterisation after observed accidental dural puncture in labouring women: update of a meta-analysis and a trial-sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our meta-analysis from 2013 showed that inserting a catheter intrathecally after an observed accidental dural puncture can reduce the need for epidural blood patch in labouring women requesting epidural analgesia. We updated our conventional meta-analysis and added a trial-sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared inserting the catheter intrathecally with an epidural catheter re-site or with no intervention. The extracted data were pooled and the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) was calculated, using the random effects model. A contour-enhanced funnel plot was constructed. A TSA was performed and the cumulative Z score, monitoring and futility boundaries were constructed. RESULTS: Our search identified 13 studies, reporting on 1653 patients, with a low risk of bias. The RR for the incidence of PDPH was 0.82 (95%CI 0.71 to 0.95) and the RR for the need for epidural blood patch was 0.62 (95%CI 0.49 to 0.79); heterogeneity of both analyses was high. The TSA showed that the monitoring or futility boundaries were not crossed, indicating insufficient data to exclude a type I error of statistical analysis. Contour-enhanced funnel plots were symmetric, suggesting no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional meta-analyses showed for the first time that intrathecal catheterisation can reduce the incidence of PDPH. However, TSA did not corroborate this finding. Despite increasing use in clinical practice there is no firm evidence on which to base a definite conclusion.

Antenatal education for childbirth-epidural analgesia.

The language structures used by antenatal educators have not been previously researched in the context of antenatal childbirth classes. Epidural analgesia for labour is a common, and a frequently asked about, component of antenatal education for parents in hospitals providing maternity care. AIM OF THE STUDY: We aimed to identify the way information is described and presented by childbirth educators to assess content and determine which language structures such as metaphor, suggestion, information and storytelling are utilized. DESIGN: This observational study of antenatal education was conducted at a single tertiary referral center for maternity care in Western Sydney, Australia. All three childbirth educators agreed to be video recorded whilst providing information to parents during antenatal classes. Audio data was subsequently transcribed and then analysed by two researchers, independently categorising the various language structures and types of information provided. For the purposes of the current study, data concerning a single topic was used for the analysis-'epidural analgesia for labour'. FINDINGS: Language structures used were highly variable between educators, as was the content and time taken for the information being provided. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Our findings represent a first attempt to identify baseline information used in the clinical setting of antenatal education in order to categories communication structures used. This study has identified areas for further improvements and consistency in the way educators provide information to parents and has important implications for future midwifery practice, education and research.

The impact of labour epidural analgesia on the childbirth expectation and experience at a tertiary care center in southern India.

BACKGROUND: Labour epidural analgesia is increasingly used as a means of pain relief for women during labour and delivery. The significant pain during labour and delivery can be terrifying for mothers-to-be and the prospect of relief from pain can help reduce fear of childbirth to an extent. However, it is not necessary that reduced fear of childbirth may lead to an increased satisfaction with the childbirth experience. AIM: To determine the influence of labour epidural analgesia (LEA) on the experience of childbirth in pregnant women at a tertiary care center in southern India Materials and Methods: A pre-post interventional non-randomized study design at a tertiary care perinatal institute that used the Wijma Delivery Expectation and Experience questionnaires to determine baseline expectations of labour and childbirth and the actual experience in pregnant women. Labour analgesia was provided on maternal request or demand. Total and domain scores were compared between the two groups using non-parametric tests and a generalized linear repeated measures model after adjusting for factors that were found significant in the bivariate model. RESULTS: The study included 235 pregnant women who opted for LEA and 219 pregnant women who opted against LEA. Overall, 37 (15.74%) of woman with LEA and 30 (13.70%) of women without LEA had a worse than expected experience of childbirth. Significant pain relief (p<0.001) was provided with LEA, however, the post-delivery scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (F=0.90, p=0.34) in a generalized linear repeated measures model. CONCLUSION: Maternal satisfaction with the process of childbirth is a complex dynamic that is not limited to the significant relief from pain provided by LEA.