Remote levodopa challenge test in Parkinson's disease: Feasibility, reliability, validity and economic value.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to demonstrate the feasibility, reliability and validity of an in-home remote levodopa challenge test (LCT), as delivered through an online platform, for patients with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). METHODS: Patients with Parkinson's disease eligible for deep brain stimulation surgery screening were enrolled. Participants sequentially received an in-home remote LCT and an in-hospital standard LCT (separated by 2.71 weeks). A modified Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III omitting rigidity and postural stability items was used in the remote LCT. The reliability of the remote LCT was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the concurrent validity was evaluated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient r between the levodopa responsiveness of the remote and standard LCT. RESULTS: Out of 106 PwPD screened, 80 (75.5%) completed both the remote and standard LCT. There was a good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.88) and a strong correlation (r = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.90) between the levodopa responsiveness of the remote and standard LCT. The mean cost for PwPD was estimated to be reduced by 91% by using the remote LCT. CONCLUSION: The remote LCT is feasible, reliable and valid and may reduce healthcare-related costs for PwPD and their caregivers.

Kinect-based objective assessment of the acute levodopa challenge test in parkinsonism: a feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is an important and valuable examination but there are still some shortcomings with it. We aimed to objectively assess ALCT based on a depth camera and filter out the best indicators. METHODS: Fifty-nine individuals with parkinsonism completed ALCT and the improvement rate (IR, which indicates the change in value before and after levodopa administration) of the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) was calculated. The kinematic features of the patients' movements in both the OFF and ON states were collected with an Azure Kinect depth camera. RESULTS: The IR of MDS-UPDRS III was significantly correlated with the IRs of many kinematic features for arising from a chair, pronation-supination movements of the hand, finger tapping, toe tapping, leg agility, and gait (rs = - 0.277 ~ - 0.672, P < 0.05). Moderate to high discriminative values were found in the selected features in identifying a clinically significant response to levodopa with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the range of 50-100%, 47.22%-97.22%, and 0.673-0.915, respectively. The resulting classifier combining kinematic features of toe tapping showed an excellent performance with an AUC of 0.966 (95% CI = 0.922-1.000, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value was 21.24% with sensitivity and specificity of 94.44% and 87.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the effect of levodopa and objectively assessing ALCT based on kinematic data derived from an Azure Kinect-based system.

3D Kinematics Quantifies Gait Response to Levodopa earlier and to a more Comprehensive Extent than the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in Patients with Motor Complications.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative 3D movement analysis using inertial measurement units (IMUs) allows for a more detailed characterization of motor patterns than clinical assessment alone. It is essential to discriminate between gait features that are responsive or unresponsive to current therapies to better understand the underlying pathophysiological basis and identify potential therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize the responsiveness and temporal evolution of different gait subcomponents in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in their OFF and various ON states following levodopa administration, utilizing both wearable sensors and the gold-standard MDS-UPDRS motor part III. METHODS: Seventeen PD patients were assessed while wearing a full-body set of 15 IMUs in their OFF state and at 20-minute intervals following the administration of a supra-threshold levodopa dose. Gait was reconstructed using a biomechanical model of the human body to quantify how each feature was modulated. Comparisons with non-PD control subjects were conducted in parallel. RESULTS: Significant motor changes were observed in both the upper and lower limbs according to the MDS-UPDRS III, 40 minutes after levodopa intake. IMU-assisted 3D kinematics detected significant motor alterations as early as 20 minutes after levodopa administration, particularly in upper limbs metrics. Although all "pace-domain" gait features showed significant improvement in the Best-ON state, most rhythmicity, asymmetry, and variability features did not. CONCLUSION: IMUs are capable of detecting motor alterations earlier and in a more comprehensive manner than the MDS-UPDRS III. The upper limbs respond more rapidly to levodopa, possibly reflecting distinct thresholds to levodopa across striatal regions.

Machine-learning model for the prediction of acute orthostatic hypotension after levodopa administration.

BACKGROUND: Levodopa could induce orthostatic hypotension (OH) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Accurate prediction of acute OH post levodopa (AOHPL) is important for rational drug use in PD patients. Here, we develop and validate a prediction model of AOHPL to facilitate physicians in identifying patients at higher probability of developing AOHPL. METHODS: The study involved 497 PD inpatients who underwent a levodopa challenge test (LCT) and the supine-to-standing test (STS) four times during LCT. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether OH occurred during levodopa effectiveness (AOHPL) or not (non-AOHPL). The dataset was randomly split into training (80%) and independent test data (20%). Several models were trained and compared for discrimination between AOHPL and non-AOHPL. Final model was evaluated on independent test data. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were employed to reveal how variables explain specific predictions for given observations in the independent test data. RESULTS: We included 180 PD patients without AOHPL and 194 PD patients with AOHPL to develop and validate predictive models. Random Forest was selected as our final model as its leave-one-out cross validation performance [AUC_ROC 0.776, accuracy 73.6%, sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 75.7%] outperformed other models. The most crucial features in this predictive model were the maximal SBP drop and DBP drop of STS before medication (ΔSBP/ΔDBP). We achieved a prediction accuracy of 72% on independent test data. ΔSBP, ΔDBP, and standing mean artery pressure were the top three variables that contributed most to the predictions across all individual observations in the independent test data. CONCLUSIONS: The validated classifier could serve as a valuable tool for clinicians, offering the probability of a patient developing AOHPL at an early stage. This supports clinical decision-making, potentially enhancing the quality of life for PD patients.