Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGT.

BACKGROUND: The landscape of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has seen a significant shift towards frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) over fresh transfers, driven by technological advancements and clinical considerations. This study aimed to compare live birth outcomes between primary FET and fresh transfers, focusing on cycles without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), using United States national data from the SART CORS database spanning from 2014 to 2020. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of autologous first ART cycles without PGT comparing primary embryo transfer (frozen thaw vs. fresh) success rates from the 2014-2020 SARTCORS database. Live-birth rates (LBR) and cumulative live-birth rates (CLBR) were compared between first FET versus first fresh embryo transfer from an index retrieval. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) determined association between live birth outcomes and method of transfer. In a subsequent sub-analysis, we compared these two embryo transfer methods among patients with either diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) or male factor infertility. RESULTS: 228,171 first ART cycles resulted in primary embryo transfer. 62,100 initial FETs and 166,071 fresh transfers were compared. Initial FETs demonstrated higher LBR and CLBR compared to fresh transfers (LBR 48.3% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001; CLBR 74.0% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.0001). MLR indicated greater chances of live birth with FET across all age groups, with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of live-birth incrementally increasing with advancing age groups. For DOR cycles, LBR and CLBR were significantly higher for FET compared to fresh (33.9% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.001, 44.5% vs. 37.6%, p < 0.0001), respectively. MF cycles also demonstrated higher LBR and CLBR with FET (52.3% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001, 81.2% vs. 68.9%, p < 0.0001), respectively. MLR demonstrated that in DOR cycles, initial FET was associated with greater chance of live birth in age groups ≥ 35yo (p < 0.01), with aOR of live birth increasingly considerably for those > 42yo (aOR 2.63, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall LBR and CLBR were greater for first FET than fresh transfers with incremental increases in odds of live birth with advancing age, suggesting the presence of a more favorable age-related change in endometrial receptivity present in frozen-thawed cycles. For both DOR and MF cycles, LBR and CLBR after primary transfer were greater for first FET than fresh. However, this was particularly evident in older ages for DOR cycles. This suggests that supraphysiologic stimulation in older DOR cycles may be detrimental to endometrial receptivity, which is in part corrected for in FET cycles.

Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and free androgen index on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in PCOS patients.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder associated with infertility and pregnancy complications. The pathogenesis of PCOS and its impact on reproductive function may be influenced by the source of androgens, including testosterone, free androgen, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). However, the differential effects of these androgen on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes and the cut-off value of East Asian population with PCOS remain unclear. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2015 to November 2022, involving 636 cycles of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Subgroup analyses were performed using cut-off values of 6.4 for free androgen index (FAI), 9.5 µmol/L for DHEAS. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to identify significant cut-off values affecting pregnancy. RESULTS: Higher FAI levels (> 6.4) were associated with decrease in clinical pregnancy rate (PR) (50.61% vs. 41.66%, p = 0.024), live birth rate (LBR) (42.42% vs. 32.35%, p = 0.011). When DHEAS levels exceeded 9.5 µmol/L, there was a significant decrease in clinical PR (51.27% vs. 42.73%, P = 0.039), LBR (42.73% vs. 32.73%, P = 0.012). Negative correlations were also observed between DHEAS levels and cumulative pregnancy rate (70.57% vs 56.62% p = 0.002) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) (59.35% vs 43.37%, p = 0.0007). Both FAI and DHEAS elevated is associated with the lowest clinical pregnancy rate (37.84%). Conversely, when solely FAI is elevated, the pregnancy rate increases to 52.38%, while an elevation in DHEAS alone is associated with a pregnancy rate of, both of which are lower than when neither FAI nor DHEAS are elevated (60.68%). The live birth rates exhibit a similar trend (30.00% vs 40.00% vs 41.83% vs 44.48%). RCS revealed a significant decrease in CPR and CLBR when DHEA levels exceeded 7.69 umol/L, while the cut-off value of FAI was 6.36 for CPR and CLBR. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PCOS patients with biochemical hyperandrogenism show unsatisfactory clinical PR and CLBR when undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). This may be attributed to the influence of both adrenal-derived DHEAS and ovarian-derived FAI on the unfavorable pregnancy outcomes.

The Analysis of in vitro Fertilization Outcomes after Fertility-Preserving Therapy for Endometrial Hyperplasia or Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of fertility-preserving therapy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures in women who were pathologically diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study on fertility-preserving therapy was conducted. Participants/Materials, Setting: A total of 82 women were enrolled who had simple endometrial hyperplasia (SH), complex hyperplasia (CH), complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma stage IA (EC IA) and underwent IVF at Gangnam CHA fertility center between January 2008 and December 2020. METHODS: The primary endpoints were oncologic outcomes and subsequent reproductive outcomes of patients who underwent fertility-preserving treatments analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients, 33 had a cumulative clinical pregnancy (40.2%), and 25 had a cumulative live birth (30.5%) through IVF procedures following pathologic confirmation of complete remission or non-progressive status. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates for SH were 50.0% and 30.0%, for CH were 37.8% and 28.9%, for CAH were 25.0% and 25.0%, and for EC were 38.5% and 38.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in cumulative clinical pregnancy rates or live birth rates when comparing the four groups. There was a difference in endometrial thickness between medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) treatment group and intrauterine device (IUD) group (p = 0.036); however, there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates among MPA, IUD, and MPA+IUD groups. LIMITATIONS: Because of the retrospective nature of the study, many factors relevant to the treatment decision were not strictly controlled. CONCLUSIONS: All endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma groups had competent cumulative live birth rates by IVF procedures. There may be differences in endometrial thickness depending on the treatment methods, but this does not affect clinical pregnancy rates. Therefore, the fertility-preserving treatment for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma is a safe and feasible method that results in good IVF outcomes.

The effects of male anxiety and depression on IVF outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the effects of male anxiety and depression on IVF outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Men with anxiety had lower final total motile sperm counts (fTMSC) during IVF compared to men without anxiety; however, there were no differences in live birth rates (LBRs). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Studies have shown that male anxiety causes low sperm motility, worse sperm morphology, and increased DNA fragmentation, which are known to be influential factors on fertilization rates and embryo quality during IVF. However, data are lacking on whether there is a direct association between male anxiety and/or depression and IVF outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a survey-based, retrospective cohort study completed at a single, large hospital-affiliated fertility center with 222 respondents who underwent IVF with or without ICSI. The study was conducted between 6 September 2018 and 27 December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Male partners of couples who underwent IVF or IVF/ICSI completed a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. They were separated into two groups for both anxiety (HADS-A ≥ 8 or HADS-A < 8) and depression (HADS-D ≥ 8 or HADS-D < 8). Men with an elevated HADS-A or HADS-D score ≥8 were considered to have anxiety or depression, respectively. The primary outcome was LBR. Secondary outcomes included semen parameters at the time of IVF, cycle outcomes, pregnancy outcomes, and prevalence of erectile dysfunction and low libido. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were a total of 222 respondents, of whom 22.5% had a HADS-A ≥ 8 and 6.5% had a HADS-D ≥ 8. The average age of respondents was 37.38 ± 4.90 years old. Antidepressant use was higher in the respondents with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≥ 8 (P < 0.05). Smoking use was similar between groups for both HADS-A and HADS-D (P > 0.05). When adjusted for male BMI, antidepressant use and smoking, men with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≥ 8 had similar rates of erectile dysfunction (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.12 (95% CI 0.60, 2.06)) and low libido (aRR = 1.70 (95% CI 0.91, 3.15)) compared to those with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≤ 8. Men with a HADS-A ≥ 8 were more likely to have a lower fTMSC on the day of oocyte retrieval (11.8 ≥ 8 vs 20.1 < 8, adjusted ß = -0.66 (95% CI -1.22, -0.10)). However, the LBR per embryo transfer (ET) was similar between the HADS-A groups (43.2% ≥8 vs 45.1% <8, adjusted relative risk = 0.90 (95% CI 0.65, 1.06)). Although depression was uncommon in the entire cohort, the HADS-D groups were clinically similar for fTMSC (18.7 ≥ 8 vs 16.0 < 8) and LBR per ET (46.7% ≥8 vs 45.4% <8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations of our study are the survey-based design, the lack of sperm morphology assessment at the time of IVF, our inability to fully assess the HADS-D ≥ 8 cohort due to the small sample size and the large Caucasian demographic. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Couples undergoing IVF have an increased likelihood of suffering from anxiety and/or depression. There is currently a debate on whether or not men should be treated with antidepressants while attempting to conceive due to potential detrimental effects on sperm quality. Our study shows that, regardless of antidepressant use, couples with men who did or did not report anxiety and/or depression have similar LBRs when undergoing IVF. Therefore, it is important to assess both partners for mental health and to not withhold treatment due to a concern about a potential impact of antidepressants or anxiety/depression on sperm quality. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding to report for this study. Z.W. is a contributing author for UptoDate. S.S.S. is on the advisory board for Ferring Pharmaceuticals. E.G. was a medical consultant for Hall-Matson Esq, Teladoc, and CRICO and is a contributing author for UptoDate. The remaining authors have nothing to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Live birth rates following individualized dosing algorithm of follitropin delta in a long GnRH agonist protocol.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of individualized follitropin delta dosing, based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration and bodyweight, in a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. METHODS: Clinical outcomes after one treatment cycle are reported in women with AMH: 5-35 pmol/L. Oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, blastocyst transfer was on Day 5 and remaining blastocysts were cryopreserved. Data collection included live births and neonatal health follow-up for all fresh/frozen transfers performed within one year after treatment allocation. RESULTS: In total, 104 women started stimulation, of whom 101 had oocyte recovery and 92 had blastocyst transfer. The average daily dose of follitropin delta was 11.0 ± 1.6 µg and the duration of stimulation was 10.3 ± 1.6 days. The mean number of oocytes was 12.5 ± 6.4, the mean number of blastocysts was 5.1 ± 3.4, and 85% had at least one good-quality blastocyst. Following mostly single blastocyst transfer (95%), the ongoing pregnancy rate was 43%, the live-birth rate was 43%, and the cumulative live-birth rate was 58% per started stimulation. There were 6 cases of early OHSS (5.8%) graded as mild (n = 3) and moderate (n = 3) and 6 cases of late OHSS (5.8%) graded as moderate (n = 3) and severe (n = 3). CONCLUSION: In this first evaluation of the individualized follitropin delta dosing in a long GnRH agonist protocol, the cumulative live-birth rate was high. A randomized trial comparing follitropin delta in a long GnRH agonist protocol versus in a GnRH antagonist protocol should provide further insight into the efficacy and safety of this treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03564509; June 21, 2018.

Cumulative live birth rates with autologous oocytes plateau with fewer number of cycles for each year of age > 42.

OBJECTIVE: To disaggregate the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) age category of " > 42" and compare age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) > 42 years old. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of autologous linked ART cycles. SETTING: United States (US) National ART Database. PATIENT(S): Women > 42 years old without a history of prior ART cycles who underwent ART between 2014-2020 as reported to the SART CORS database. INTERVENTION(S): Disaggregate the SART CORS age category of " > 42" into age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age-stratified cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) for women ≥ 43 years old. RESULTS: Between 2014-2020, 24,650 women > 42 years old without history of prior ART underwent 58,132 cycles, resulting in 1,982 live births. Women ages 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, ≥ 50 achieved maximal CLBR of 9.7%, 8.6%, 5.0%, 3.6%, 2.5%, 1.5%, 2.7%, 1.3%, respectively. CLBR for women between 43-45 were significantly higher compared to those 46 and older (p < 0.05). Among women 46 and older, CLBR were not significantly different. Women ages 43 and 44 did not exhibit a significant increase in CLBR beyond the 5th cycle. Age 45 and 46 reached CLBR plateau by the 3rd cycle. Age ≥ 47 CLBR plateaued after the first cycle. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, nulliparity, etiology of infertility, number of oocytes retrieved, embryos transferred, blastocyst transfer, use of ICSI, PGT, and ART treatment cycle number, there was no association between markers of ovarian reserve (day 3 FSH and random AMH levels) and live birth for women > 42. CONCLUSIONS: While CLBR of autologous cycles from women 42 or younger generally plateau by cycle number 5, age-stratified cycles from women > 42 plateau after fewer cycles to maximize CLBR. Patient and physician expectations for maximum CLBR beyond 42 may be practically based on fewer planned cycles before reaching an age-specific CLBR plateau than may have been previously expected.

Effect of the ratios of estradiol increase on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with antagonist regimens: a single center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF) is often determined according to follicle and estradiol levels following gonadotropin stimulation. In previous studies, although most of them analyzed the estrogen level from ovaries or the average estrogen level of a single follicle, there was no study on the ratio of estrogen increase, which was also correlated with pregnancy outcomes in the clinic. This study aimed to make timely adjustments to follow-up medication to improve clinical outcomes based on the potential value of estradiol growth rate. METHODS: We comprehensively analyzed estrogen growth during the entire ovarian stimulation period. Serum estradiol levels were measured on the day of gonadotropin treatment (Gn1), five days later (Gn5), eight days later (Gn8), and on the trigger day (HCG). This ratio was used to determine the increase in estradiol levels. According to the ratio of estradiol increase, the patients were divided into four groups: A1 (Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 6.44), A2 (6.44 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 10.62), A3 (10.62 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 21.33), and A4 (Gn5/Gn1 > 21.33); B1 (Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 2.39), B2 (2.39 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.03), B3 (3.03 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.84), and B4 (Gn8/Gn5 > 3.84). We analyzed and compared the relationship between data in each group and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: In the statistical analysis, the estradiol levels of Gn5 (P = 0.029, P = 0.042), Gn8 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), and HCG (P < 0.001, P = 0.002), as well as Gn5/Gn1 (P = 0.004, P = 0.006), Gn8/Gn5 (P = 0.001, P = 0.002), and HCG/Gn1 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) both had clinical guiding significance, and lower one significantly reduced the pregnancy rate. The outcomes were positively linked to groups A (P = 0.036, P = 0.043) and B (P = 0.014, P = 0.013), respectively. The logistical regression analysis revealed that group A1 (OR = 0.376 [0.182-0.779]; P = 0.008*, OR = 0.401 [0.188-0.857]; P = 0.018*) and B1 (OR = 0.363 [0.179-0.735]; P = 0.005*, OR = 0.389 [0.187-0.808]; P = 0.011*) had opposite influence on outcomes. CONCLUSION: Maintaining a serum estradiol increase ratio of at least 6.44 on Gn5/Gn1 and 2.39 on Gn8/Gn5 may result in a higher pregnancy rate, especially in young people.

Presence of endometrioma decreased blastocyst formation rate but not impair Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcome.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the impact of endometrioma on patients who undergo ART treatment due to endometriosis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on women ≤ 40 years of age who underwent ART treatment at an academic medical center between January 2014 and December 2020. Two-hundred-and-eight women had received IVF/ICSI treatment due to endometriosis and there were 89 patients presence of endometrioma. Patients were further divided into primary endometrioma, recurrent endometrioma and those having received cystectomy for endometrioma prior to IVF/ICSI. The control group included 624 infertile women without endometriosis. RESULTS: In the endometrioma subgroup (B) the blastocyst formation rate was significantly lower when compared with the endometriosis (A) and control groups (C). The cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) (60.5% versus 49.4% versus 56.9%, p = 0.194 in A versus B, p = 0.406 in A versus C, p = 0.878 in B versus C) were comparable. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that female age, total FSH dose and blastocyst formation rate were the significant variables in predicting CLBR (OR 0.89, CI 0.80-0.99, p < 0.025, OR 0.68 CI 0.53-0.88, p = 0.003 and OR 30.04, CI 9.93-90.9, p < 0.001, respectively). The CLBRs were comparable at 47.1%, 60% and 57.9% in the primary endometrioma, s/p cystectomy and recurrent endometrioma group. CONCLUSION: Although the blastocyst formation rate was lower in the endometrioma group, CLBR was not worse than those who were in the endometriosis or control group. Cystectomy for endometrioma did not alter IVF/ICSI outcomes if the ovarian reserve was comparable. Recurrent endometrioma did not worsen IVF/ICSI outcomes than primary endometrioma.

Does PGT-A improve assisted reproduction treatment success rates: what can the UK Register data tell us?

PURPOSE: To show how naïve analyses of aggregated UK ART Register data held by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to estimate the effects of PGT-A can be severely misleading and to indicate how it may be possible to do a more credible analysis. Given the limitations of the Register, we consider the extent to which such an analysis has the potential to answer questions about the real-world effectiveness of PGT-A. METHODS: We utilise the publicly available Register datasets and construct logistic regression models for live birth events (LBE) which adjust for confounding. We compare all PGT-A cycles to control groups of cycles that could have had PGT-A, excluding cycles that did not progress to having embryos for biopsy. RESULTS: The primary model gives an odds ratio for LBE of 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-1.00) suggesting PGT-A may be detrimental rather than beneficial. However, due to limitations in the availability of important variables in the public dataset, this cannot be considered a definitive estimate. We outline the steps required to enable a credible analysis of the Register data. CONCLUSION: If we compare like with like groups, we obtain estimates of the effect of PGT-A that suggest an overall modest reduction in treatment success rates. These are in direct contrast to an invalid comparison of crude success rates. A detailed analysis of a fuller dataset is warranted, but it remains to be demonstrated whether the UK Register data can provide useful estimates of the impact of PGT-A when used as a treatment add-on.

Competition, insurance mandates, and clinical practices and outcomes at in vitro fertilization clinics.

PURPOSE: The high cost of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures coupled with public availability of success rates may influence IVF practice patterns and success rates but may be mitigated by mandated insurance coverage for IVF procedures. This study examined associations of competition with IVF practice patterns and success rates by insurance mandate status. METHODS: We used publicly available 2018 National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System data from the CDC. We defined competition as distance to nearest clinic and number of clinics within certain radii. We used linear regression to explore associations of competition, insurance mandate status, and interactions between competition and mandate status with clinical practice patterns (e.g., percentage of cycles among patients < 35 years, percentage of cycles using ICSI, average number of embryos transferred) and IVF success rates (e.g., live birth rates). We also assessed the percentage of variation in outcomes explained by our models, R2. RESULTS: For practice patterns, the largest R2 value was 0.3518, meaning only 35.18% of the variability in the practice pattern variable was explained by competition and insurance mandate status. In most cases, the R2 values were less than 0.20, indicating little to no association. Less than 10% of the variability in success rates was explained by competition and insurance mandate status. CONCLUSION: The multiple regression analyses all yielded low R2 values, indicating weak associations. These encouraging results coincide with previous studies, suggesting that competition, even by insurance mandate status, does not have a strong association with IVF practice patterns or success rates.

Live birth rates after natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy for single euploid blastocyst transfers: a retrospective cohort study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there any difference in live birth rate between the natural cycle and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) endometrial preparation protocols for women with regular menstrual cycles undergoing their first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer? DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study that enrolled 722 women who underwent vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer at assisted reproductive technology (ART) centre of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, from January 2013 to December 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyse the relationship between the endometrial preparation protocols and live birth rates. Stratified analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the reliability and stability of the results. RESULTS: A total of 722 single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer cycles were included. Overall, the live birth rates were 50.00% (110/220) in the natural cycle group and 47.61% (239/502) in the HRT group. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that there was no significant association (adjusted odds ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.20; P = 0.313) between natural cycle and HRT protocols and the live birth rate. Interaction analysis showed that there was no significant difference in live birth rates between the two groups for any subgroup after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: For single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, natural cycle and HRT endometrial preparation protocols result in similar live birth rates among women with regular menstrual cycles. Further studies are needed into the effects of endometrial preparation protocols on pregnancy outcomes.

Progesterone levels predict pregnancy outcomes in individuals with fallopian tube associated infertility.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at determining the predictive value of human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone levels on pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving in vitro fertilization due to fallopian tube associated infertility. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 854 cycles due to fallopian tube associated infertility in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer. The clinical data had been collected from January 2010 to December 2018 and was divided into 7 groups depending on the progesterone level on human chorionic gonadotropin administration day. Live birth rates and observation trends were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was established to determine the optimal cutoff value for progesterone, which was used to further divide the data into 3 groups; Group 1 (progesterone ≦ 1.0 ng/ml), Group 2 (1.0 ng/ml ≤ progesterone ≤ 1.25 ng/ml), and Group 3 (progesterone ≥ 1.25 ng/ml). We then compared the ovulation results and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, infertility years, gonadotropin dosage, gonadotropin days, Luteinizing hormone level on human chorionic gonadotropin day, 2 pronuclear fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, full-term birth rate, and preterm birth rates among the three groups. However body mass index (p = 0.001), basal luteinizing hormone (p = 0.034), estrogen peak (p < 0.001), number of oocytes obtained (P < 0.001) were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone level on human chorionic gonadotropin day does not affect the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization. However, progesterone levels between 1.0 and 1.25 ng/ml may lead to good clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the success rates for women returning to ART treatment in the hope of having a second ART-conceived child. SUMMARY ANSWER: The cumulative live birth rate (LBR) for women returning to ART treatment was between 50.5% and 88.1% after six cycles depending on whether women commenced with a previously frozen embryo or a new ovarian stimulation cycle and the assumptions made regarding the success rates for women who dropped-out of treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies have reported the cumulative LBR for the first ART-conceived child to inform patients about their chances of success. However, most couples plan to have more than one child to complete their family and, for that reason, patients commonly return to ART treatment after the birth of their first ART-conceived child. To our knowledge, there are no published data to facilitate patient counseling and clinical decision-making regarding the success rates for these patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A population-based cohort study with 35 290 women who commenced autologous (using their own oocytes) ART treatment between January 2009 and December 2013 and achieved their first treatment-dependent live birth from treatment performed during this period. These women were then followed up for a further 2 years of treatment to December 2015, providing a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 7 years of treatment follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Cycle-specific LBR and cumulative LBR were calculated for up to six complete ART cycles (one ovarian stimulation and all associated transfers). Three cumulative LBR were calculated based on the likelihood of success in women who dropped-out of treatment (conservative, optimal and inverse probability-weighted (IPW)). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to predict the chance of returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child, and a discrete time logistic regression model was used to predict the chance of achieving a second ART-conceived child up to a maximum of six complete cycles. The models were adjusted for patient characteristics and previous and current treatment characteristics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the women who had their first ART-conceived live birth, 15 325 (43%) returned to treatment by December 2015. LBRs were consistently better in women who recommenced treatment with a previously frozen embryo, compared to women who underwent a new ovarian stimulation cycle. After six complete cycles, plus any surplus frozen embryos, the cumulative LBR was between 60.9% (95% CI: 60.0-61.8%) (conservative) and 88.1% (95% CI: 86.7-89.5%) (optimal) [IPW 87.2% (95% CI: 86.2-88.2%)] for women who recommenced treatment with a frozen embryo, compared to between 50.5% (95% CI: 49.0-52.0%) and 69.8% (95% CI: 67.5-72.2%) [IPW 68.1% (95% CI: 67.3-68.9%)] for those who underwent a new ovarian stimulation cycle. The adjusted odds of a second ART-conceived live birth decreased for women ≥35 years, who waited at least 3 years before returning to treatment, or who required a higher number of ovarian stimulation cycles or double embryo transfer to achieve their first child. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our estimates do not fully account for a number of individual prognostic factors, including duration of infertility, BMI and ovarian reserve. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study to report success rates for women returning to ART treatment to have second ART-conceived child. These age-specific success rates can facilitate individualized counseling for the large number of patients hoping to have a second child using ART treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received to undertake this study. R. Paul and O. Fitzgerald have nothing to declare. D. Lieberman reports being a fertility specialist and receiving non-financial support from MSD and Merck outside the submitted work. C. Venetis reports being a fertility specialist and receiving personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Serono and Beisins and non-financial support from Ferring outside the submitted work. G.M. Chambers reports being a paid employee of the University of New South Wales, Sydney (UNSW) and Director of the National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU), UNSW. The Fertility Society of Australia (FSA) contracts UNSW to prepare the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproductive Technology Database (ANZARD) annual report series and benchmarking reports. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.

The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A.

BACKGROUND: A recently published Position Statement (PS) by the Preimplantation Genetics Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) regarding utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) contained inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Because opinions issued by the PGDIS have since 2016 determined worldwide IVF practice, corrections appear of importance. METHODS: The International Do No Harm Group in IVF (IDNHG-IVF) is a spontaneously coalesced body of international investigators, concerned with increasing utilization of add-ons to IVF. It is responsible for the presented consensus statement, which as a final document was reached after review of the pertinent literature and again revised after the recent publication of the STAR trial and related commentaries. RESULTS: In contrast to the PGDIA-PS, we recommend restrictions to the increasing, and by IVF centers now often even mandated, utilization of PGT-A in IVF cycles. While PGT-A has been proposed as a tool for achieving enhanced singleton livebirth outcomes through embryo selection, continued false-positive rates and increasing evidence for embryonic self-correction downstream from the testing stage, has led IDNHG-IVF to conclude that currently available data are insufficient to impose overreaching recommendations for PGT-A utilization. DISCUSSION: Here presented consensus offers an alternative to the 2019 PGDIS position statement regarding utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Mindful of what appears to offer best outcomes for patients, and in full consideration of patient autonomy, here presented opinion is based on best available evidence, with the goal of improving safety and efficacy of IVF and minimizing wastage of embryos with potential for healthy births. CONCLUSIONS: As the PGDIS never suggested restrictions on clinical utilization of PGT-A in IVF, here presented rebuttal represents an act of self-regulation by parts of the IVF community in attempts to control increasing utilization of different unproven recent add-ons to IVF.

Does LH suppression by progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation compared with GnRH antagonist affect live birth rate among oocyte recipients?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is live birth rate among recipients of donated oocytes different depending on mode of treatment for endogenous LH suppression administered to oocyte donors during ovarian stimulation? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of recipients of freshly donated oocytes from oocyte donors who underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins at a private, university-based infertility clinic between January 2017 and March 2018. For endogenous LH suppression, oocyte donors received daily injections of gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix (GNR) or daily oral 75 µg desogestrel (DSG) until triggering with 0.2 mg of triptorelin. Three hundred recipient cycles of freshly donated oocytes were included: 154 from oocyte donor DSG cycles and 146 from oocyte donor GNR cycles. RESULTS: Comparison of basal characteristics of oocyte donors showed no differences in mean age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels and body mass index between the oocyte donor DSG p and oocyte donor GNR groups, respectively. Similarly, no differences were observed among mean age of recipients and body mass index. Out of 300 fresh embryo transfers, 190 clinical pregnancies (63.3%) and 150 live births (50%) were achieved. Per embryo transfer clinical pregnancy rate was 66.2% in the DSG recipient group and 60.3% in the GNR recipient group (P = 0.338). Live birth rates were not significantly different between both groups (48.7% among DSG recipient group and 51.4% among GNR recipient group; P = 0.729). CONCLUSIONS: Live birth rate among recipients of donated oocytes does not differ depending on the mode of treatment for endogenous LH suppression administered to the oocyte donors during ovarian stimulation. This information is reassuring and will be of interest to teams using these kinds of protocols, although further research is needed.

Single and double embryo transfer provide similar live birth rates in frozen cycles.

Research question: Do live birth rates (LBRs) differ in frozen cycles of women who received single versus double embryo transfer?Design: Retrospective cohort study including women who underwent their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a tertiary referral University Hospital between 2009-2014.Results: 3601 patients were included in the analysis with 1936 (53.8%) having a single embryo transfer (SET) and 1665 (46.2%) having a double embryo transfer (DET). Overall, 657/3601 (18.24%) had a live birth. LBR were similar between SET and DET either for cleavage [100/757 (13.1%) versus 153/1032 (14.8%), p = .33] or blastocyst stage FET [256/1179 (21.7%) versus 148/633 (23.4%), p = .4). Ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable between DET and SET [316/1665 (18.9%) versus 359/1936 (18.5%)]. Multiple delivery rates were significantly higher in women with DET compared to SET [53/316 (16.7%) versus 7/359 (1.9%), p < .001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis allowing adjustment for relevant confounders showed that the number of embryos transferred in the frozen cycle was not related to LBR.Conclusions: This is the largest study providing evidence that both SET and DET may result in similar LBR, albeit multiple pregnancy rates are significantly lower in case of SET. Therefore, SET should be the main strategy in women undergoing FET.

Assisted reproductive technology outcome in United States of America and Australia with New Zealand: comparison of annual reports 2005-2016.

In vitro fertilization can be considered as causative factor of increasing rate of multiple pregnancies. Analysis of factors contributing to reduction in the percentage of multiple pregnancies may contribute to overall improvement of ART results. We compared annual reports from The Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database and US National Summary Reports presented by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The aim of this study was to analyze results of ART outcomes in two countries presenting opposite approach to ART, particularly to number of transferred embryos and number of eSETs (elective single embryo transfers). We found significant increase in total number of initiated cycles and transfers with significant shift toward frozen cycles and transfers in both countries. Percentage of eSET increased while average number of embryos transferred per one transfer decreased significantly in both countries without significant difference between countries. We also noticed significant decrease in the rate of multiple pregnancies and percentage of pregnancies resulting in triplets in Australia with New Zealand. Decreasing number of multiple pregnancies and higher percentage of transfers and pregnancies resulting in singleton live birth are the changes in ART politics found in our analysis. United States of America have more significant changes toward eSET, although Australia and New Zealand have significantly higher percentage of eSET from the beginning of analysis.

Roles of estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in the live birth of patients with frozen embryo transfer.

BACKGROUND: Estradiol (E2 ) is an important hormone in women. Changes of serum E2 levels may affect the endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation and thus affect pregnancy outcomes. This study was to assess the association between serum E2 levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration and live-birth rates in patients with frozen embryo transfer (FET). METHODS: Totally 2071 women receiving long protocols of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists were enrolled. According to the E2 levels on the day of HCG administration, these patients were divided into four groups: 676 cases of E2  ≤ 3051 pg/mL in Q1 group, 676 cases of 3051 pg/mL < E2  ≤ 4558 pg/mL in Q2 group, 675 cases of 4558 pg/mL < E2  ≤ 6718 pg/mL in Q3 group, and 674 cases of E2  > 6718 pg/mL in Q4 group. The clinical indicators including female age, body mass index (BMI), duration of infertility, infertility styles, treatment protocols, hormone levels, total antral follicle count, endometrial thickness, top-level embryos, and live-birth rates were analyzed, and multivariable logistic model was conducted to select significant variables. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for the female age (OR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.946-0.985, P < .001), total antral follicle counts (OR = 1.025, 95% CI: 1.008-1.043, P = .004), transferring what day of embryos (OR = 1.242, 95% CI: 1.137-1.356, P < .001), endometrial thickness (OR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.004-1.115, P = .035), top-level embryos (OR = 1.416, 95% CI: 1.157-1.731, P = .001), and E2 levels on HCG day >6781 pg/mL (OR = 1.344, 95% CI: 1.069-1.690, P = .011) between live-birth and non-live-birth groups. The area under the curve (AUC) for E2 levels on HCG day was 0.558, the sensitivity was 54.75%, and the specificity was 55.10%. CONCLUSION: Serum E2 level on HCG day was an independent predictor of live-birth achievement in patients with FET.

Success rates in minimal stimulation cycle IVF with clomiphene citrate only.

PURPOSE: To determine age-adjusted overall success rates for patients undergoing clomiphene citrate only minimal stimulation cycle (mini) in vitro fertilization (IVF) without any gonadotropin administration. METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-nine women (mean age: 38.4 ± 0.1 years; 2488 cycles) underwent clomiphene citrate only mini-IVF. Their first oocyte retrieval was between January 2009 and December 2009, with follow-up until December 2014. The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte retrieval cycle started and live birth rate per oocyte was retrospectively analyzed. The basic CLBR was calculated as the number of women who achieved a live birth divided by the total number of women who started oocyte retrieval. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 1.5. The basic CLBRs for all ages after the first and third cycles were 22.6% and 39.2%, respectively. For ≤ 34 years, 35-37 years, 38-40 years, 41-42 years, and ≥ 43 years, CLBRs after the first and third cycles were 42.5% and 70.1%, 32.9% and 49.1%, 20.0% and 38.6%, 12.6% and 25.2%, and 4.4% and 8.8%, respectively. These rates had a significant relationship with age (P < 0.01). The LBR per oocyte for all ages was 9.6%. CONCLUSION: Acceptable overall IVF success rates can be achieved in clomiphene citrate only mini-IVF, as well as acceptable LBR. The CLBRs and LBRs per oocyte are evidently influenced by women's age.

The role of propofol on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation and early embryo development.

SummaryPropofol is a intravenous anaesthetic most commonly used in ultrasound oocyte retrieval. We studied if the use of propofol had an effect on mouse oocyte maturation, pregnancy, childbirth and progeny and investigated the correlation between propofol side effects and reproductive performance in mice. There was no statistical difference in mating, pregnancy, childbirth, litter size, the number of stillbirths and survival between each group (P>0.05). Propofol also had no effect on polar body extrusion in oocyte maturation as well as on pronucleus formation and, subsequently, early embryo development (P>0.05). An increased concentration of propofol had no effect on this result, although propofol at more than 0.01 mg/ml reduced polar body extrusion. Different concentrations of propofol had no effect on oocyte culture in vitro, pronucleus formation and early embryo development.