2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Single-Nuclei RNA-Sequencing of the Gastrocnemius Muscle in Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a growing epidemic with limited effective treatment options. Here, we provide a single-nuclei atlas of PAD limb muscle to facilitate a better understanding of the composition of cells and transcriptional differences that comprise the diseased limb muscle. METHODS: We obtained gastrocnemius muscle specimens from 20 patients with PAD and 12 non-PAD controls. Nuclei were isolated and single-nuclei RNA-sequencing was performed. The composition of nuclei was characterized by iterative clustering via principal component analysis, differential expression analysis, and the use of known marker genes. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to determine differences in gene expression between PAD and non-PAD nuclei, as well as subsequent analysis of intercellular signaling networks. Additional histological analyses of muscle specimens accompany the single-nuclei RNA-sequencing atlas. RESULTS: Single-nuclei RNA-sequencing analysis indicated a fiber type shift with patients with PAD having fewer type I (slow/oxidative) and more type II (fast/glycolytic) myonuclei compared with non-PAD, which was confirmed using immunostaining of muscle specimens. Myonuclei from PAD displayed global upregulation of genes involved in stress response, autophagy, hypoxia, and atrophy. Subclustering of myonuclei also identified populations that were unique to PAD muscle characterized by metabolic dysregulation. PAD muscles also displayed unique transcriptional profiles and increased diversity of transcriptomes in muscle stem cells, regenerating myonuclei, and fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells. Analysis of intercellular communication networks revealed fibro-adipogenic progenitors as a major signaling hub in PAD muscle, as well as deficiencies in angiogenic and bone morphogenetic protein signaling which may contribute to poor limb function in PAD. CONCLUSIONS: This reference single-nuclei RNA-sequencing atlas provides a comprehensive analysis of the cell composition, transcriptional signature, and intercellular communication pathways that are altered in the PAD condition.

Lower extremity arterial disease vs. coronary artery disease: mortality differences after revascularization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients undergoing revascularization for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) may face a higher risk of mortality than those with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to characterize the difference in mortality risk between patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD and CAD and identify associated factors. METHODS: The 1-year database of 10 754 patients undergoing revascularization for CAD (n = 6349) and LEAD (n = 4405) was analysed. Poisson regression models were used to characterize interpopulation differences in mortality, adjusting for baseline clinical features, including age, sex, polyvascular disease, comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities. RESULTS: Individuals with LEAD were older, were more likely to have polyvascular disease, had more comorbidities, and received fewer cardioprotective drugs than those with CAD. Vulnerabilities remained more common in the LEAD group even after adjusting for these clinical features. The crude risk ratio of mortality incidence for LEAD vs. CAD was 2.91 (95% confidence interval, 2.54-3.34), attenuated to 2.14 (1.83-2.50) after controlling for age, sex, and polyvascular disease. The percentage attenuation in the excessive mortality associated with LEAD was 29%. The stepwise addition of comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities as adjusting factors attenuated the incidence risk ratio to 1.48 (1.26-1.72), 1.33 (1.12-1.58), and 1.17 (0.98-1.39), respectively, and increased the percentage attenuation to 64%, 73%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk was almost three-fold higher in patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD than in those with CAD. The excessive mortality was considerably attributable to inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, including potentially clinically or socially modifiable factors.

Predicting wound complications following lower extremity revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to create a simple risk score to identify factors associated with wound complications after infrainguinal revascularization. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program national data set was queried from 2005 to 2021 to identify 22,114 patients undergoing elective open revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (claudication, rest pain, tissue loss) or peripheral aneurysm. Emergency and trauma cases were excluded. The data set was divided into a two-thirds derivation set and one-third validation set to create a risk prediction model. The primary end point was wound complication (wound dehiscence, superficial/deep wound surgical site infection). Eight independent risk factors for wound complications resulted from the model and were assigned whole number integer risk scores. Summary risk scores were collapsed into categories and defined as low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), high (8-11 points), and very high (>12 points). RESULTS: The wound complication rate in the derivation data set was 9.7% (n = 1428). Predictors of wound complication included age ≤73 (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.46), body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.68-2.36), non-Hispanic White (vs others: OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.30-1.69), diabetes (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37), white blood cell count >9900/mm3 (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35), absence of coronary artery disease (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35), operative time >6 hours (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37), and undergoing a femoral endarterectomy in conjunction with bypass (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57). In both the derivation and validation sets, wound complications correlated with risk category. Among the defined categories in the derivation set, wound complication rates were 4.5% for low-risk patients, 8.5% for moderate-risk patients, 13.8% for high-risk patients, and 23.8% for very high-risk patients, with similar results for the internal validation data set. Operative indication did not independently associate with wound complications. Patients with wound complications had higher rates of reoperation and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model uses easily obtainable clinical metrics that allow for informed discussion of wound complication risk for patients undergoing open infrainguinal revascularization.

Risk score for one-year mortality following emergent infra-inguinal bypass.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify variables that place patients at higher risk for mortality following emergent infra-inguinal bypass. Further, this study will create a risk score for mortality following emergent infra-inguinal bypass to help tailor postoperative and long-term patient management. METHODS: In the Vascular Quality Initiative, we identified 2126 patients who underwent emergent infra-inguinal artery bypass. Two primary outcomes were investigated: 30 day mortality following emergent infra-inguinal bypass; and 1-year mortality following emergent infra-inguinal bypass. The first step in analysis was univariable analysis for each outcome with χ2 analysis for categorical variables and Student t-test for comparison of means of ordinal variables. Next, binary logistic regression analysis was performed for each outcome utilizing variables that achieved a univariable P value ≤ .10. Factors with a multivariable P value ≤ .05 were included in the risk score, and points were weighted and assigned based on the respective regression beta-coefficient in the multivariable regression. RESULTS: Variables with a significant multivariable association (P < .05) with 1-year mortality were: increasing age; body mass index less than 20 kg/m2; coronary artery disease; active hemodialysis at time of presentation; anemia at admission; prosthetic conduit for emergent bypass; postoperative myocardial infarction; postoperative acute renal insufficiency; perioperative stroke; baseline non-ambulatory status; new onset hemodialysis requirement perioperatively; need for bypass revision or thrombectomy during index admission; lack of statin prescription at discharge; lack of antiplatelet medication at discharge; and, lack of anticoagulation at time of hospital discharge. Pertinent negatives included all sociodemographic variables including rural living status, insurance status, and Area Deprivation Index home area. The risk score achieved an area under the curve of 0.820, and regression analysis of the risk score achieved an overall accuracy of 87.9% with 97.7% accuracy in predicting survival, indicating the model performs better in determining which patients will survive rather than precisely determining who will experience 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge medications are the primary modifiable variable impacting survival after emergent infra-inguinal bypass surgery. In the absence of contraindication, all these patients should be discharged on antiplatelet, statin, and anticoagulant medications after emergent infra-inguinal bypass as they significantly enhance survival. Social determinants of health do not impact survival among patients treated with emergent infra-inguinal bypass at Vascular Quality Initiative centers. A risk score for mortality at 1 year after emergent infra-inguinal bypass has been created that has excellent accuracy.

Socioeconomic disadvantage is a leading variable in risk score for major amputation following emergent infrainguinal arterial bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify patients at particularly high risk for major amputation after emergent infrainguinal bypass to help tailor postoperative and long-term patient management. METHODS: In the Vascular Quality Initiative, we identified 2126 patients who underwent emergent infrainguinal artery bypass. Two primary outcomes were investigated: major ipsilateral amputation above the ankle level during the index hospitalization and major amputation above the ankle at any time after emergent infrainguinal bypass surgery (perioperative and postdischarge combined). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed for each outcome using variables that achieved a univariable P value of ≤.10. We then determined which variables have a multivariable association for the outcomes as defined by a regression P value of ≤.05. A risk score was then created for the outcome of amputation after emergent infrainguinal bypass using weighted beta-coefficient. Variables with a multivariable P value of ≤.05 were included in the risk score and weighted based on their respective regression beta-coefficient in a point scale. RESULTS: Overall, 17.1% of patients (368/2126) underwent major amputation at some point in follow-up after emergent infrainguinal artery bypass. The mean follow-up duration on the amputation variable was 261 days with the end point being time of amputation or time of last follow-up data on the amputation variable. Variables with a significant multivariable association (P < .05) with major amputation at any point after emergent infrainguinal arterial bypass were home status in top 10% (most deprived) of Area Deprivation Index, prior infrainguinal ipsilateral arterial bypass, prior ipsilateral endovascular arterial intervention, prosthetic bypass conduit, postoperative skin/soft tissue infection, and postoperative need to revise or thrombectomize bypass. Pertinent negatives on multivariable analysis included all baseline comorbidities, insurance status, race, and gender. There is steep progression in amputation rate ranging from 5% at scores of 0 and 1 to >60% for scores in of >10. Area under the curve analysis revealed a value of 0.706. CONCLUSIONS: Patients living in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic neighborhoods have an increased risk of amputation after emergent infrainguinal arterial bypass independent of baseline comorbidities and perioperative events. Baseline comorbidities are not impactful regarding amputation rates after emergent infrainguinal bypass surgery. The need for bypass revision or thrombectomy during the index hospitalization is the most impactful factor toward amputation after emergency bypass. A risk score with quality accuracy has been developed to help identify patients at particularly high likelihood of limb loss, which may aid in counseling regarding heightened vigilance in postoperative and long-term follow-up care.

Including socioeconomic status reduces readmission penalties to safety-net hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) financially penalizes "excessive" postoperative readmissions. Concerned with creating a double standard for institutions treating a high percentage of economically vulnerable patients, Medicare elected to exclude socioeconomic status (SES) from its risk-adjustment model. However, recent evidence suggests that safety-net hospitals (SNHs) caring for many low-SES patients are disproportionately penalized under the HRRP. We sought to simulate the impact of including SES-sensitive models on HRRP penalties for hospitals performing lower extremity revascularization (LER). METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of national data on Medicare patients undergoing open or endovascular LER procedures between 2007 and 2009. We used hierarchical logistic regression to generate hospital risk-standardized 30-day readmission rates under Medicare's current model (adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and procedure type) compared with models that also adjust for SES. We estimated the likelihood of a penalty and penalty size for SNHs compared with non-SNHs under the current Medicare model and these SES-sensitive models. RESULTS: Our study population comprised 1708 hospitals performing 284,724 LER operations with an overall unadjusted readmission rate of 14.4% (standard deviation: 5.3%). Compared with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services model, adjusting for SES would not change the proportion of SNHs penalized for excess readmissions (55.1% vs 53.4%, P = .101) but would reduce penalty amounts for 38% of SNHs compared with only 17% of non-SNHs, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: For LER, changing national Medicare policy to including SES in readmission risk-adjustment models would reduce penalty amounts to SNHs, especially for those that are also teaching institutions. Making further strides toward reducing the national disparity between SNHs and non-SHNs on readmissions, performance measures require strategies beyond simply altering the risk-adjustment model to include SES.

Multicenter parallel randomized trial evaluating incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection after lower extremity bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) applied over all incisions after lower extremity bypass in the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) is unclear. The primary and secondary aims of this study were to investigate if prophylactic iNPWT after the elective lower extremity bypass prevents SSI and other surgical wound complications. METHODS: This was a multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing elective lower extremity bypass in 3 hospitals were randomized to either iNPWT or standard dressings. SSIs or other wound complications were assessed within the first 90 days by wound care professionals blinded to the randomized result. The validated Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, and Stay (ASEPSIS) score was used to objectively assess the wounds. ASEPSIS score ≥21 is defined as an SSI. Unilateral and bilateral groups were analyzed with the Fisher exact test and the McNemar test, respectively. RESULTS: In the unilateral group (n = 100), the incidence of SSI in the iNPWT group was 34.9% (15/43), compared with 40.3% (23/57) in the control group, according to the ASEPSIS score (P = .678). In the bilateral group (n = 7), the SSI rate was 14.3% (1/7) in the iNPWT group compared with 14.3% (1/7) in the control group (P = 1.00). In the unilateral group, there was a higher wound dehiscence rate in the control group (43.9%) compared with the iNPWT group (23.3%) (P = .0366). No serious iNPWT-related adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: There was no reduction of SSI rates in leg incisions with iNPWT compared with standard dressings in patients undergoing elective lower extremity bypass, whereas iNPWT reduced the incidence of wound dehiscence.

DETOUR2 trial outcomes demonstrate clinical utility of percutaneous transmural bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex femoropopliteal disease.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transmural arterial bypass (PTAB) using the DETOUR system aims to create a percutaneous, endovascular femoropopliteal bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery disease. The goal of the DETOUR2 study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the therapy in comparison with pre-established performance goals. METHODS: The DETOUR2 investigational device exemption study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international trial of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients (Rutherford classes 3-5) undergoing the DETOUR procedure for long segment (>20 cm) superficial femoral artery disease. Prespecified end points included primary safety (composite of major adverse events) at 30 days, and effectiveness (primary patency defined as freedom from restenosis or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. RESULTS: We enrolled 202 patients at 32 sites with 200 treated with the DETOUR system. The mean lesion length was 32.7 cm, of which 96% were chronic total occlusions (CTO) and 70% were severely calcified. Technical success was achieved in 100% of treated patients. The primary safety end point was met with a 30-day freedom from major adverse event rate of 93.0%. The 1-year primary effectiveness end point was met with 72.1% primary patency at 12 months. Primary-assisted and secondary patency were 77.7% and 89.0%, respectively, at 12 months. The 12 month deep venous thrombosis incidence was 4.1% with no pulmonary emboli reported. Venous quality-of-life scores showed no significant changes from baseline. There was a Rutherford improvement of at least one class through 12 months in 97.2% of patients. The mean ankle-brachial index also improved from 0.61 to 0.95 during this period. There were marked improvements in quality-of-life and functional status measures. CONCLUSIONS: The DETOUR2 study met both the primary safety and effectiveness end points, demonstrating clinical usefulness of this novel therapeutic strategy in long femoropopliteal lesions.

Comparative evaluation of transcutaneous oxygen tension and ankle-brachial index as predictors of reoperation following below-knee amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Decision-making regarding level of lower extremity amputation is sometimes challenging. Selecting an appropriate anatomic level for major amputation requires consideration of tradeoffs between postoperative function and risk of wound complications that may require additional operations, including debridement and/or conversion to above-knee amputation (AKA). We evaluated the utility of common, non-invasive diagnostic tests used in clinical practice to predict the need for reoperations among patients undergoing primary, elective, below knee-amputations (BKAs) by vascular surgeons. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective BKA over a 5-year period were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records were reviewed to characterize demographics, pre-amputation testing transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2), and ankle-brachial index (ABI). The need for ipsilateral post-BKA reoperation (including BKA revision and/or conversion to AKA) regardless of indication was the primary outcome. Associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cutpoints for TcPO2 values associated with amputation reoperation were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: We identified 175 BKAs, of which 46 (26.3%) required ipsilateral reoperation (18.9% BKA revisions and 14.3% conversions to AKA). The mean age was 63.3 ± 14.8 years. Most patients were male (65.1%) and White (72.0%). Mean pre-amputation calf TcPO2 was 40.0 ± 20.5 mmHg, and mean ABI was 0.64 ± 0.45. In univariable models, post-BKA reoperation was associated with calf TcPO2 (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99; P = .013) but not ABI (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.19-1.46; P = .217). Univariable associations with reoperation were also identified for age (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.990; P = .003) and diabetes (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87; P = .019). No associations with amputation revision were identified for gender, race, end-stage renal disease, or preoperative antibiotics. Calf TcPO2 remained associated with post-BKA reoperation in a multivariable model (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .022) adjusted for age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .222) and diabetes (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .559). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested a TcPO2 ≥38 mmHg as an appropriate cut-point for assessing risk for BKA revision (area under the curve = 0.682; negative predictive value, 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation after BKA is common, and reoperation risk was associated with pre-amputation TcPO2. For patients undergoing elective BKA, higher risk of reoperation should be discussed with patients with an ipsilateral TcPO2 <38 mmHg.

Real-world application of Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection scores in peripheral arterial disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world use of the system and whether it predicts outcomes accurately after open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Using data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 and 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages 1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on postrevascularization outcomes. RESULTS: In the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n = 14,529) had WIfI stage documented. PVIs were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization. Of the patients, 49.5% were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3, and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent open surgical revascularization, whereas stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (P < .001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (P < .001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (P < .001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates. CONCLUSIONS: The SVS WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI after lower extremity revascularization. Because nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within 1 year of intervention, this finding study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision-making for patients with CLTI.

Polyvascular disease is common in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and lower extremity bypass and is associated with worse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Polyvascular disease is strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, its prevalence in patients undergoing carotid and lower extremity surgical revascularization and its impact on outcomes are unknown. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB), 2013-2019. Polyvascular disease was defined as presence of atherosclerotic occlusive disease in more than one arterial bed: carotid, coronary, and infrainguinal. Primary outcomes were (1) composite perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or death and (2) 5-year survival. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using the χ2 test and multivariable logistic regression. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards multivariable models. RESULTS: Polyvascular disease was identified in 47% of CEA (39.0% in 2 arterial beds, 7.6% in 3 arterial beds; n = 93,736) and 47% of LEB (41.0% in 2 arterial beds, 5.7% in 3 arterial beds; n = 25,223). For both CEA and LEB, patients with polyvascular disease had more comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease (P < .0001). Perioperative MI/death rates increased with increasing number of vascular beds affected following CEA (0.9% in 1 bed vs 1.5% in 2 beds vs 2.7% in 3 beds; P < .001) and LEB (2.2% in 1 bed vs 5.3% in 2 beds vs 6.6% in 3 beds; P < .001). Polyvascular disease was associated independently with perioperative MI/death after CEA (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.81;P < .0001) and LEB (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08; P < .0001). Five-year survival was decreased in patients with polyvascular disease after CEA (82% in 3 beds vs 88% in 2 beds vs 92% in 1 bed; P < .01) and LEB (72% in 3 beds vs 75% in 2 beds vs 84% in 1 bed; P < .01) in a dose-dependent manner, with the lowest 5-year survival observed in those with three arterial beds involved. Polyvascular disease was independently associated with 5-year mortality after CEA (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.24-1.40; P = .0001) and LEB (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.20-1.41; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Polyvascular disease is common in patients undergoing CEA and LEB and is associated with a higher risk of perioperative MI/death and decreased long-term survival. After revascularization, patients with polyvascular disease should be considered for more aggressive cardioprotective medications and closer follow-up.

Long-term outcomes of great saphenous vein harvest techniques for infrainguinal arterial bypass in a Medicare-matched registry database.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes for harvesting techniques for great saphenous vein (GSV) and its impact on the outcomes of infrainguinal arterial bypass remains largely unknown. Endoscopic GSV harvesting (EVH) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to conventional open techniques. Using the Vascular Quality initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance & Interventional Outcomes Network (VQI-VISION) database, we compared the long-term outcomes of infrainguinal arterial bypass using open and endoscopic GSV harvest techniques. METHODS: Patients who underwent infrainguinal GSV bypass between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the VQI-VISION Medicare linked database. Long-term outcomes of major/minor amputations, and reinterventions up to 5 years of follow-up were compared between continuous incisions, skip incision, and EVH, with continuous incisions being the reference group. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day readmission, in addition to surgical site infections and patency rates at 6 months to 2 years postoperatively. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression hazard models were utilized to compare outcomes between groups. To adjust for multiple comparisons between the study groups, a P value of 2.5% was considered significant. RESULTS: Among the 8915 patients included in the study, continuous and skip vein harvest techniques were used in 44.4% and 43.4% of cases each, whereas 12.3% underwent EVH. The utilization of EVH remained relatively stable at around 12% throughout the study period. Compared with GSV harvest using continuous incisions, EVH was associated with higher rates of reintervention at 1 year (46.5% vs 41.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.41; P = .01]. However, no significant difference was observed between EVH and continuous incisions, and between skip and continuous incisions in terms of long-term reintervention or major and minor amputations on adjusted analysis. Compared with continuous incision vein harvest, both EVH and skip incisions were associated with lower surgical site infection rates within the first 6 months post-bypass (aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82 and aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87, respectively). Loss of primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency was higher after EVH compared with continuous incision vein harvest. Among surgeons performing EVH, comparable long-term outcomes were observed regardless of low (<4 cases/year), medium (4-7 cases/year), or high procedural volumes (>7 cases/year). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher 1-year reintervention rates, EVH for infrainguinal arterial bypass is not associated with a significant difference in long-term reintervention or amputation rates compared with other harvesting techniques. These outcomes are not influenced by procedural volumes for EVH technique.

Presentation and patterns of reinterventions after revascularization in patients with premature peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Premature peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (age ≤50 years) has been shown to negatively impact the outcomes of lower extremity revascularization (LER). Patients with premature PAD have an increased risk of major amputation compared with older patients. The primary goal of this study is to compare the frequency of reinterventions after LER in patients with premature PAD to their older counterparts with common age of presentation (ie, 60-80 years). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing LER for PAD in a single center was performed. Clinical, procedural, and socioeconomic characteristics were compared between patients with premature PAD and the older group. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were captured and compared including mortality, major amputation, reintervention rate and frequency, as well as major adverse limb events. RESULTS: There were 1274 patients who underwent LER (4.3% premature, 61.8% age 60-80). Patients with premature PAD were more likely to be females of racial minorities. Notably, the mean Distressed Communities Index score was significantly higher in the premature PAD group compared with the older patients. Patients with premature PAD were significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease but less likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease compared with older patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, patients with premature PAD were significantly more likely to undergo more frequent reinterventions compared with older patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar overall survival and major adverse limb event-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with premature PAD are likely to undergo more frequent reinterventions after initial LER and have similar 5-year survival curves compared with patients at least 20 years older. Demographic and socioeconomic differences impacting patients with premature PAD, even in this relatively underpowered institutional experience, are striking and warrant further investigation.

Diagnostic accuracy of the maximal systolic acceleration to detect peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be challenging owing to medial arterial calcification (MAC) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current bedside tests, such as the ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index, are often insufficient. The maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a velocimetric Doppler-derived parameter and could be a new promising test in the diagnostic workup of these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ACCmax to detect PAD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients ≥18 years old with suspected PAD who underwent ACCmax measurement(s) along with computed tomography angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities (reference test) were eligible for inclusion. ACCmax measurements of the posterior tibial artery, anterior tibial artery and peroneal artery were collected. Diagnostic performance was assessed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: In total, 340 patients (618 limbs) were included. Approximately 40% suffered from DM and 30% had CKD. Diagnostic performance of the ACCmax to detect PAD for the posterior tibial artery showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 93%, positive likelihood ratio of 12.83, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.11 (AUC, 0.953). For the anterior tibial artery, these results were 94%, 97%, 32.06, and 0.06 (same sequence as presented before) with an AUC of 0.984. The peroneal artery had a performance of 86%, 89%, 7.51, and 0.16, respectively (AUC, 0.893). Diagnostic accuracy of the ACCmax did not diminish in subgroup analysis for patients with DM or CKD. CONCLUSIONS: The ACCmax showed excellent diagnostic performance to detect PAD, independent of patients prone to medial arterial calcification.

Direct oral anticoagulants over warfarin at discharge associated with improved survival and patency in infra-geniculate bypasses with prosthetic conduits.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the optimal anticoagulant regimen following lower extremity bypass. Historically, warfarin has been utilized for prosthetic or compromised vein bypasses. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly replacing warfarin in this context, but their efficacy in bypass preservation has not been well-studied. Recent studies have shown that DOACs may improve outcomes following bypasses; however, it is unclear if this is dependent upon type of bypass conduit. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a difference exists between vein and prosthetic infra-geniculate bypasses outcomes based on the anticoagulant utilized on discharge, warfarin or DOAC. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative infra-inguinal bypass database was queried for all patients who underwent an infra-geniculate bypass and were anticoagulation-naive at baseline but were discharged on either warfarin or DOACs. A survival analysis was performed for patients up to 1 year to determine whether the choice of discharge anticoagulation was associated with differences between those with vein vs prosthetic conduits in overall survival, primary patency, risk of amputation, or risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to control for differences in baseline demographic factors between the groups. RESULTS: During the study period (2003-2020), 57,887 patients underwent infra-geniculate bypass. Of these, 3230 (5.5%) were anticoagulated on discharge. There was a similar distribution of anticoagulation between vein (n = 1659; 51.4%) and prosthetic conduits (n = 1571; 48.6%). Thirty-two percent were discharged on DOACs, and 68.0% were discharged on warfarin. For prosthetic conduits, being discharged on a DOAC was associated with improved outcomes on univariate and multivariable analyses revealing lower risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.93; P = .021), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = .003), risk of amputation (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93; P = .013), and risk of MALE (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-1.00; P = .048). Patients with a vein bypass had improved univariate outcomes for survival and primary patency; however, with multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in outcomes between DOAC and warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation-naive patients who underwent an infra-geniculate prosthetic bypass had higher rates of overall survival, bypass patency, amputation-free survival, and freedom from MALE when discharged on a DOAC compared with warfarin. Those with vein bypasses had similar outcomes regardless of the choice of anticoagulation.

Secondary interventions following open vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial.

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia experience a high burden of target limb reinterventions. We analyzed data from the Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) randomized trial comparing initial open bypass (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) treatment strategies, with a focus on reintervention-related study endpoints. METHODS: In a planned secondary analysis, we examined the rates of major reintervention, any reintervention, and the composite of any reintervention, amputation, or death by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1 with suitable single-segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], n = 1434; cohort 2 lacking suitable SSGSV, n = 396). We also compared the cumulative number of major and all index limb reinterventions over time. Comparisons between treatment arms within each cohort were made using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: In cohort 1, assignment to OPEN was associated with a significantly reduced hazard of a major limb reintervention (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.49; P < .001), any reintervention (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75; P < .001), or any reintervention, amputation, or death (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78; P < .001). Findings were similar in cohort 2 for major reintervention (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84; P = .007) or any reintervention (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P = .04). In both cohorts, early (30-day) limb reinterventions were notably higher for patients assigned to ENDO as compared with OPEN (14.7% vs 4.5% of cohort 1 subjects; 16.6% vs 5.6% of cohort 2 subjects). The mean number of major (mean events per subject ratio [MR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.58; P < .001) or any target limb reinterventions (MR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; P < .001) per year was significantly less in the OPEN arm of cohort 1. The mean number of reinterventions per limb salvaged per year was lower in the OPEN arm of cohort 1 (MR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.35-0.57; P < .001 and MR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.79; P < .001 for major and all, respectively). The majority of index limb reinterventions occurred during the first year following randomization, but events continued to accumulate over the duration of follow-up in the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention is common following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Among patients deemed suitable for either approach, initial treatment with open bypass, particularly in patients with available SSGSV conduit, is associated with a significantly lower number of major and minor target limb reinterventions.

Clinical factors associated with ultrashort length of stay in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Length of stay (LOS) is a major driver of cost and resource utilization following lower extremity bypass (LEB). However, the variable comorbidity burden and mobility status of LEB patients makes implementing enhanced recovery after surgery pathways challenging. The aim of this study was to use a large national database to identify patient factors associated with ultrashort LOS among patients undergoing LEB for peripheral artery disease. METHODS: All patients undergoing LEB for peripheral artery disease in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database from 2011 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the postoperative length of stay : ultrashort (≤2 days) and standard (>2 days). Thirty-day outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with ultrashort LOS. RESULTS: Overall, 17,510 patients were identified who underwent LEB, of which 2678 patients (15.3%) had an ultrashort postoperative LOS (mean, 1.8 days) and 14,832 (84.7%) patients had a standard LOS (mean, 7.1 days). When compared to patients with a standard LOS, patients with an ultrashort LOS were more likely to be admitted from home (95.9% vs 88.0%; P < .001), undergo elective surgery (86.1% vs 59.1%; P < .001), and be active smokers (52.1% vs 40.4%; P < .001). Patients with an ultrashort LOS were also more likely to have claudication as the indication for LEB (53.1% vs 22.5%; P < .001), have a popliteal revascularization target rather than a tibial/pedal target (76.7% vs 55.3%; P < .001), and have a prosthetic conduit (40.0% vs 29.9%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (1.4% vs 1.8%; P = .21); however, patients with an ultrashort LOS had a lower frequency of unplanned readmission (10.7% vs 18.8%; P < .001) and need for major reintervention (1.9% vs 5.6%; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, elective status (odds ratio , 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-3.04), active smoking (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30), and lack of vein harvest (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41-1.70) were associated with ultrashort LOS. Presence of rest pain (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63), tissue loss (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27-0.34), and totally dependent functional status (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84) were associated negatively with an ultrashort LOS. When examining the subgroup of patients who underwent vein harvest, totally dependent (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75) and partially dependent (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) functional status were persistently negatively associated with ultrashort LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrashort LOS (≤2 days) after LEB is uncommon but feasible in select patients. Preoperative functional status and mobility are important factors to consider when identifying LEB patients who may be candidates for early discharge.

Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy: Consensus recommendation from the Chinese Medical Association (CMA), Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA).

Diabetic foot ulcer complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy is highly prevalent, slow healing and have a poor prognosis. The final progression leads to amputation, or may even be life-threatening, seriously affecting patients' quality of life. The treatment of lower extremity vasculopathy is the focus of clinical practice and is vital to improving the healing process of diabetic foot ulcers. Recently, a number of clinical trials on diabetic foot ulcers with lower extremity vasculopathy have been reported. A joint group of Chinese Medical Association (CMA) and Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) expert representatives reviewed and reached a consensus on the guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this kind of disease. These guidelines are based on evidence from the literature and cover the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy and the application of new treatment approaches. These guidelines have been put forward to guide practitioners on the best approaches for screening, diagnosing and treating diabetic foot ulcers with lower extremity vasculopathy, with the aim of providing optimal, evidence-based management for medical personnel working with diabetic foot wound repair and treatment.

The impact of diabetes on mortality rates after lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of diabetes, amputation level, sex and age on mortality rates after lower extremity amputation (LEA) in Belgium, and to assess temporal trends in one-year survival rates from 2009 to 2018. METHODS: Nationwide data on individuals who underwent minor and major LEA from 2009 to 2018 were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed. A Cox regression model with time-varying coefficients was used to estimate the likelihood of mortality after LEA in individuals with or without diabetes. Matched amputation-free individuals with or without diabetes were used for comparison. Time trends were analysed. RESULTS: Amputations 41,304 were performed: 13,247 major and 28,057 minor. Five-year mortality rates in individuals with diabetes were 52% and 69% after minor and major LEA, respectively (individuals without diabetes: 45% and 63%, respectively). In the first six postoperative months, no differences in mortality rates were found between individuals with or without diabetes. Later, hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality in individuals with diabetes (compared with no diabetes) after minor LEA ranged from 1.38 to 1.52, and after major LEA from 1.35 to 1.46 (all p ≤ 0.005). Among individuals without LEA, HRs for mortality in diabetes (versus no diabetes) were systematically higher compared to the HRs for mortality in diabetes (versus no diabetes) after minor and major LEA. One-year survival rates did not change for individuals with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In the first six postoperative months, mortality rates after LEA were not different between individuals with or without diabetes; later, diabetes was significantly associated with increased mortality. However, as HRs for mortality were higher in amputation-free individuals, diabetes impacts mortality less in the minor and major amputation groups relative to the comparison group of individuals without LEA.