Toxicities of axitinib, sunitinib and temsirolimus: implications for progression-free and overall survival in metastatic renal cell cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between axitinib, sunitinib and temsirolimus toxicities and patient survival in metastatic renal cell cancer patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of metastatic renal cell cancer patients from the prospective multicenter STAR-TOR study were assessed using multivariable Cox models. A total of 1195 patients were included (n = 149 axitinib; n = 546 sunitinib; n = 500 temsirolimus). The following toxicities significantly predicted outcomes: hand-foot skin reaction (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29) for PFS with axitinib; stomatitis (HR = 0.62) and pneumonitis (HR = 0.23) for PFS with temsirolimus; stomatitis (HR = 0.52) and thrombocytopenia (HR = 0.6) for OS with temsirolimus; fatigue (HR = 0.71) for PFS with sunitinib; hand-foot skin reaction (HR = 0.56) and fatigue (HR = 0.58) for OS with sunitinib. In conclusion, in metastatic renal cell cancer, axitinib, sunitinib and temsirolimus demonstrate specific toxicities that are protective OS/PFS predictors.

Can Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Create a New Perspective for the IMDC Scoring System in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate impact of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on prognosis and survival within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score groups. METHODS: The records of 187 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed retrospectively. The SII was calculated as follows: SII = Neutrophil × Platelet/Lymphocyte. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on a median SII of 730 (×109 per 1 L) as SII low (<730) and SII high (≥730). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and a Cox regression model was utilized to determine independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (range: 34-86 years). Kaplan-Meier tests revealed significant differences in survival between the SII-low and SII-high levels (27.0 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001). The Cox regression model revealed that SII was an independent prognostic factor. The implementation of the log-rank test in the IMDC groups according to the SII level provided the distinction of survival in the favorable group (SII low 49.0 months vs. SII high 11.0 months, p < 0.001), in the intermediate group (SII low 26.0 vs. SII high 15.0 months, p = 0.007), and in the poor group (SII low 19.0 vs. SII high 6.0 months, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The SII was an independent prognostic factor and provided significant differences in survival for the favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC groups. Thus, the SII added to the IMDC score may be clinically beneficial in predicting survival.

Efficacy and safety profile of nivolumab for Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, which has a promising anti-tumor efficacy and a manageable safety profile, has being rapidly introduced in metastatic renal cell cancer therapy in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy and adverse events of nivolumab in real world clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: The medical records of 45 consecutive patients who started treatment with nivolumab, up to September 2018, were reviewed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 22.3 months. The best responses were a complete response in three patients (8%), a partial response in 14 patients (36%), stable disease in 14 patients (36%), and progressive disease in eight patients (20%). The median progression-free survival period and 1 year progression-free survival rate were 14.9 months and 54.5%, respectively. The estimated overall survival period and 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates from initiation of nivolumab were not reached, and 91.1%, and 86.2%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients (60%) experienced adverse events including four (10%) severe adverse events (Grade 3 or 4). The most common adverse event was rash (n = 9, 20%). Five patients discontinued nivolumab therapy, because of an adverse event (Grade 3 diarrhea, one patient; Grade 2 fatigue, one patient; Grade 3 uveitis, two patients; and Grade 3 adrenal insufficiency, one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab has a relatively favorable efficacy and safety profile for Japanese metastatic renal cell cancer patients in clinical practice.

Anlotinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor inhibiting angiogenesis. This multicenter, randomized phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in comparison with sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mRCC from 13 clinical centers were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib (n = 90) or sunitinib (n = 43). Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily (2 weeks on/1 week off), and sunitinib was given orally at 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. RESULTS: The median PFS was similar with anlotinib and sunitinib (17.5 vs. 16.6 months, p > .05). The median OS (30.9 vs. 30.5 months, p > .05), ORR (30.3% vs. 27.9%), and 6-week DCR (97.8% vs. 93.0%) were similar in the two groups. Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or 4 were significantly less frequent with anlotinib than with sunitinib (28.9% vs. 55.8%, p < .01), especially in terms of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. AEs occurring at a lower frequency with anlotinib were hand-foot syndrome, eyelid edema, hair depigmentation, skin yellowing, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The incidence of serious AEs was lower with anlotinib than with sunitinib. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of anlotinib was similar to that of sunitinib as the first-line treatment for mRCC, but with a more favorable safety profile. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anlotinib, which was developed independently in China, is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor inhibiting multiple kinases involved in angiogenesis and tumor proliferation. Results indicated that the efficacy of anlotinib is comparable to and the safety is better than that of sunitinib.

Ιmpact of sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism on survival of patients with metastatic renal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib plays an important role in managing the metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism is a common side-effect of the drug. There have been attempts to link hypothyroidism with a better clinical outcome in sunitinib-treated (mRCC) patients. Our aim was to relate the impact of hypothyroidism to the survival of these patients. METHODS: We have evaluated 70 patients with mRCC that received sunitinib as a first line treatment. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was measured at baseline, after 15 days of treatment (day-15) and at the end of the second cycle (day-75). Biomarker data and correlations with response were analysed with Microsoft Excel. Comparison results from Student's t-test with a p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meyer and log-rank tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 for Windows. RESULTS: Regarding the response to treatment, a progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.47 months and an overall survival (OS) of 22.03 months were demonstrated. Our data are consistent with published data by other authors. On day-15 from the beginning of the treatment an important number of patients exhibited a TSH elevation. On day-15 42.86% had a TSH over the upper normal limit and 50.0% at the end of the second cycle (day-75). TSH increased earlier in patients that exhibited an objective response (× 3.33 times the baseline values on day-15) than patients that exhibited disease stabilisation (× 2.18) or disease progression (× 1.59). Early increases in TSH were associated with a longer PFS (11.92 vs. 8.82 months, p = 0.0476) and a longer OS (3.10 vs. 1.08 years, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: Early TSH-increase is associated with a clinical benefit. The patients that showed at least a twofold increase of their baseline TSH, responded to therapy by stabilisation or by regression of disease. This is the only study to our knowledge which shows that early increases - 2 weeks from starting the treatment - in TSH levels have a prognostic value. Both PFS and OS of the patients who demonstrated a higher than a twofold rise were significantly longer than the PFS and the OS of the patients that presented a lower or no TSH-increase.

Dose escalation can maximize therapeutic potential of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, based on limited evidence, increased sunitinib exposure is associated with better outcome. The survival and toxicity data of patients receiving individualized dose escalated sunitinib therapy as compared to standard management were analyzed in this study. METHODS: From July 2013, the data of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with slight progression but still a stable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria treated with an escalated dose of sunitinib (first level: 62.5 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 × 2/1 scheme, second level: 75 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 × 2/1 scheme) were collected prospectively. Regarding characteristics, outcome, and toxicity data, an explorative retrospective analysis of the register was carried out, comparing treatments after and before July 1, 2013 in the study (selected patients for escalated dose) and control (standard dose) groups, respectively. RESULTS: The study involved 103 patients receiving sunitinib therapy with a median overall and progression free survival of 25.36 ± 2.62 and 14.2 ± 3.22 months, respectively. Slight progression was detected in 48.5% of them. First and second-level dose escalation were indicated in 18.2% and 4.1% of patients, respectively. The dosing scheme was modified in 22.2%. The median progression free survival (39.7 ± 5.1 vs 14.2 ± 1.3 months (p = 0.037)) and the overall survival (57.5 ± 10.7 vs 27.9 ± 2.5 months (p = 0.044)) were significantly better in the study group (with dose escalation) than in the control group. Patients with nephrectomy and lower Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) scores showed more favorable outcomes. After dose escalation, the most common adverse events were worsening or development of fatigue, hypertension, stomatitis, and weight loss of over 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation of sunitinib dosing in selected patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, especially in case of slight progression, based on tolerable toxicity is safe and improves outcome. Dose escalation in 12.5 mg steps may be recommended for properly educated patients.

Validation of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model for first-line pazopanib in metastatic renal carcinoma: the Spanish Oncologic Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) SPAZO study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line pazopanib were not included in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model. SPAZO (NCT02282579) was a nation-wide retrospective observational study designed to assess the effectiveness and validate the IMDC prognostic model in patients treated with first-line pazopanib in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 278 patients, treated with first-line pazopanib for mRCC in 34 centres in Spain, were locally recorded and externally validated. Mean age was 66 years, there were 68.3% male, 93.5% clear-cell type, 74.8% nephrectomized, and 81.3% had ECOG 0-1. Metastatic sites were: lung 70.9%, lymph node 43.9%, bone 26.3%, soft tissue/skin 20.1%, liver 15.1%, CNS 7.2%, adrenal gland 6.5%, pleura/peritoneum 5.8%, pancreas 5%, and kidney 2.2%. After median follow-up of 23 months, 76.4% had discontinued pazopanib (57.2% due to progression), 47.9% had received second-line targeted therapy, and 48.9% had died. RESULTS: According to IMDC prognostic model, 19.4% had favourable risk (FR), 57.2% intermediate risk (IR), and 23.4% poor risk (PR). No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Response rate was 30.3% (FR: 44%, IR: 30% PR: 17.3%). Median progression-free survival (whole population) was 11 months (32 in FR, 11 in IR, 4 in PR). Median and 2-year overall survival (whole population) were 22 months and 48.1%, respectively (FR: not reached and 81.6%, IR: 22 and 48.7%, PR: 7 and 18.8%). These estimations and their 95% confidence intervals are fully consistent with the outcomes predicted by the IMDC prognostic model. CONCLUSION: Our results validate the IMDC model for first-line pazopanib in mRCC and confirm the effectiveness and safety of this treatment.

Outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been approved based on registration clinical trials that have strict eligibility criteria. The clinical outcomes of patients treated with targeted agents but are ineligible for trials are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: mRCC patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy were retrospectively deemed ineligible for clinical trials (according to commonly used inclusion/exclusion criteria) if they had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <70%, nonclear-cell histology, brain metastases, hemoglobin ≤9 g/dl, creatinine >2× the upper limit of normal, corrected calcium ≥12 mg/dl, platelet count of <100 × 10(3)/uL, or neutrophil count <1500/mm(3). RESULTS: Overall, 768 of 2210 (35%) patients in the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) were deemed ineligible for clinical trials by the above criteria. Between ineligible versus eligible patients, the response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival of first-line targeted therapy were 22% versus 29% (P = 0.0005), 5.2 versus 8.6 months, and 12.5 versus 28.4 months (both P < 0.0001), respectively. Second-line PFS (if applicable) was 2.8 months in the trial ineligible versus 4.3 months in the trial eligible patients (P = 0.0039). When adjusted by the IMDC prognostic categories, the HR for death between trial ineligible and trial eligible patients was 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.378-1.751, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients that are ineligible for clinical trials is substantial and their outcomes are inferior. Specific trials addressing the unmet needs of protocol ineligible patients are warranted.

Sunitinib for metastatic renal cell cancer patients: observational study highlighting the risk of important drug-drug interactions.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib, a CYP3A4 substrate, is standard of care treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and is administered orally as a single dose of 50 mg, in a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off regimen. Frequently, dose reduction is necessary because of toxicity, as is the association of comedication to treat side effects. In addition, existing comorbidities in these patients necessitate the intake of various classes of chronic medication. Only limited data are available on the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI). The objective of our paper was to evaluate prescribed dose, comedication, risk of drug-drug interactions and outcome among patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective analysis was performed for patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. The drug interaction databases 'Clinical Pharmacology' and 'Lexicomp' were used to screen for possible interactions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The hospital files of 36 patients with mRCC were evaluated. Twenty-two patients received sunitinib as first-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) in this first-line group was longer for patients that started with full-dose sunitinib (21·1 months; n = 12) than for patients started on reduced dose (3·5 months; n = 10). In the whole group of 36 patients, an average of 6·8 comedications was taken. Possible pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions were most frequently found (47%) and reported as major interactions (QT prolongation). Risk of pharmacokinetic interactions due to co-administration of CYP inhibitors, CYP inducers, CYP substrates and PgP substrates was reported for 8%, 11%, 53% and 19%, respectively. These interactions were reported as major or moderate. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Patients with mRCC under treatment with sunitinib at a reduced starting dose had a decreased PFS compared with patients started with full-dose sunitinib. Due to adverse drug reactions and comorbidity, patients under sunitinib, a CYP3A4 substrate, took an average of 6·8 comedications provoking an important risk of major-to-moderate drug-drug interactions. With the help of a multidisciplinary team, avoidance of drug-drug interactions could be obtained. Moreover, serial ECG monitoring is recommended for patients at high risk of QT prolongation.

The impact of metastasectomy on survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer in Finland: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most of the studies on metastasectomy in renal cell cancer are based on metachronous, often oligometastatic disease. Prior data on the impact of metastasectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is, however, very scarce. We aimed to investigate the role of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in a large, nationwide patient population. METHODS: We analyzed nationwide data, including all synchronous mRCC cases in Finland diagnosed during a 6-year period identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals. We only included the patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor by nephrectomy. We performed univariate and multivariable adjusted analysis to identify the effect of metastasectomy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: We included 483 patients with synchronous mRCC. Overall, 57 patients underwent complete and 96 incomplete metastasectomy, while 330 patients had no metastasectomy. The median OS was 17.9 and CSS 17.2 months for all patients. The median OS and the median CSS were 59.3 and 60.8 months for the complete, 21.9 and 25.1 for the incomplete, and 14.5 and 14.8 months for the no metastasectomy groups (p < 0.001 for differences). In both applied multivariable statistical models, the OS and CSS benefit from complete metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.42 and 0.54, p < 0.001) compared with the no metastasectomy group. However, there was no improvement in survival estimates in the incomplete metastasectomy group compared with the no metastasectomy group (HRs varied between 1.04 and 1.10, p > 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Complete metastasectomy, when possible, can be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with synchronous mRCC who are fit for surgery. By contrast, we found no survival benefit from an incomplete metastasectomy suggesting that such procedures should not be performed for these patients.

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration-pooled Analysis of Frontline Combination Treatment Survival Benefits by Risk Groups in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While frontline immuno-oncology/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) combination therapy has established a benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), this may differ by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk grouping. Looking at individual trials, we noted an apparently smaller magnitude of benefit for favorable-risk disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess treatment benefit by risk groupings, especially in favorable-risk, augmenting patient numbers via a pooled analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We pooled four frontline mRCC trials of IO/TKI combinations including 3,098 patients (839 favorable-risk) with approvals from 2019 to 2021. INTERVENTION: All trials used IO/TKI combinations as the treatment option and sunitinib as the control. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by IMDC groupings. To specifically address the favorable-risk group, we combined all others into an intermediate/poor-risk group. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In this exploratory analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, IO/TKI combinations have yet to demonstrate an OS benefit in favorable-risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86, 1.78) despite demonstrating an OS benefit in the intermediate/poor-risk group (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.75). In contrast, IO/TKI demonstrated a PFS benefit for both the favorable-risk (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79) and the intermediate/poor-risk (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.60) group. For objective response rate, a smaller difference was observed between the combination and sunitinib arms in favorable-risk (68.2% vs 49.9%) versus intermediate/poor-risk (59.9% vs 36.5%) groups, while the difference in complete response rate was larger for favorable-risk (15.3% vs 6.0%) versus intermediate/poor-risk (9.1% vs 3.4%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The frontline IO/TKI combination therapy benefit was shown to be greater in the intermediate/poor-risk group than in the favorable-risk group. The OS benefit observed with IO/TKI for mRCC has yet to be demonstrated for favorable-risk patients; longer follow-up is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with intermediate/poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma derive an overall survival benefit from immuno-oncology/tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, while data for favorable-risk remain immature.

Interference of Herbal Medicine with Axitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Treatment: A Case Study.

Introduction: The awareness and the clinical relevance of the potential interactions between standard and complementary medicine are increasing in medical oncology. Nonetheless, the research and experience of the efficacy, safety, and toxicity of herbal substances are poorly documented. Case Presentation: Here, we report the case of a 68-year-old female patient who had been diagnosed with advanced renal cell cancer with metastasis in the liver and pancreas and had undergone surgical resection with hemi-hepatectomy and resection of metastasis in the pancreas in November 2021. Thereafter, chemotherapy was immediately initiated with three-weekly infusions of pembrolizumab and daily intake of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib. Surprisingly, 3 months after initiation of systemic treatment, the patient developed early progression and metastasis in the liver, which was then treated with selective internal radiotherapy. Despite continued axitinib and pembrolizumab treatment, a short-term follow-up in November 2022 revealed another metastatic lesion in her pancreas. Due to the presumed lack of response to treatment, the plasma concentration of axitinib was measured and found to demonstrate subtherapeutic levels of exposure. Upon extended anamnesis, the patient reported regular intake of herbal substances prescribed by her oncology acupuncturist for gastrointestinal complaints associated with the primary operation. Conclusion: Further clinical-pharmacological workup strikingly demonstrated a reduction of the therapeutic concentration of axitinib of about 90%, likely caused by herbal drugs such as Dang gui and Bai zhu.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for radically unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the Japanese population.

INTRODUCTION: At present, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or an ICI and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are the main treatment options as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Among them, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was recently launched in Japanese clinical practice. AREA COVERED: In this review, the efficacies and safety profiles of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for mRCC between Japanese and global populations are compared. In addition, lenvatinib is currently available for the treatment of not only mRCC but also of endometrial, thyroid, thymic, and hepatocellular cancers. We briefly summarized the characteristics of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or lenvatinib monotherapy for these malignancies. Finally, the characteristics of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for mRCC in the Japanese population are briefly elucidated. EXPERT OPINION: In order to develop optimal personalized treatment for mRCC patients, it is necessary for physicians who treat mRCC patients to possess in-depth knowledge of not only the efficacy and safety profile of the respective therapies but also of the interpatient heterogeneities between Japanese and global populations.

Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Sunitinib With or Without Cryoablation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) has emerged as an alternative to extirpative management of small renal masses in select patients. In recent years, the use of targeted therapies has become mainstream, while the role of PCA in treating primary tumor is not well established among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We sought to evaluate how mRCC patients react to PCA in combination with sunitinib. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with mRCC (primary tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm) treated with sunitinib between 2013 and 2019. These patients were categorized by initial treatment (cryoablation followed by sunitinib versus sunitinib only). Oncological outcomes and rate of adverse events were compared. RESULTS: Of the 178 patients analyzed, 65 underwent PCA prior to sunitinib. The median overall survival (OS) in the PCA-sunitinib group was 31.7 months (95% CI; 26.1-37.3), better than the sunitinib-only group, which reported a median OS of 19.8 months (95% CI; 17.1-22.4) (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with PCA-sunitinib versus sunitinib alone was 13.8 months (95% CI; 10.0-17.6) versus 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.1-8.3) (p < 0.005). No significant differences in adverse events were observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCA combined with sunitinib is associated with better survival outcomes than sunitinib alone in patients with mRCC. Careful patient selection remains warranted. These results should inform future prospective trials.

Combination therapies in clinical trials for renal cell carcinoma: how could they impact future treatments?

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological combinations using immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKIs), and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR) have improved survival in metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer (mccRCC). Despite improvements in survival, complete durable responses are rare. AREAS COVERED: Molecular pathways involved in mccRCC and drugs targets are highlighted. The background and rationale for combination therapy are covered. Results from combination trials are reviewed and potential approaches with biomarker-stratified treatment and novel experimental agents are examined. PubMed Central and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Search terms used to identify clinical trials were '(metastatic renal cell cancer OR renal cell carcinoma OR mccRCC OR mRCC OR RCC OR kidney cancer) AND (combination OR combined).' EXPERT OPINION: First-line standard of care has moved to combination therapy with ICI-ICI and TKI-ICI combinations; VEGF-mTORi is available in subsequent lines. Combining targeted treatments without validated biomarkers is imprecise, and combinations may lead to overtreatment of a subset of patients, exposing them to unnecessary toxicity. The aim of combinations must be clear: improvement in overall survival (OS) and complete response (CR). Recent data suggest a role for novel biomarker stratification rather traditional risk groups. Further combination approaches with triplets and quadruplets should be biomarker directed.

Feasibility Study on Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI to Assess the Effect of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy within the STAR Trial of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.

Objective: To identify dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters predictive of early disease progression in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treated with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods: The study was linked to a phase II/III randomised control trial. Patients underwent DCE-MRI before, at 4- and 10-weeks after initiation of TKI. DCE-MRI parameters at each time-point were derived from a single-compartment tracer kinetic model, following semi-automated tumour segmentation by two independent readers. Primary endpoint was correlation of DCE-MRI parameters with disease progression at 6-months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for parameters associated with disease progression at 6 months. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: 23 tumours in 14 patients were measurable. Three patients had disease progression at 6 months. The percentage (%) change in perfused tumour volume between baseline and 4-week DCE-MRI (p = 0.016), mean transfer constant Ktrans change (p = 0.038), and % change in extracellular volume (p = 0.009) between 4- and 10-week MRI, correlated with early disease progression (AUC 0.879 for each parameter). Inter-observer agreement was excellent for perfused tumour volume, Ktrans and extracellular volume (ICC: 0.928, 0.949, 0.910 respectively). Conclusions: Early measurement of DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour perfusion at 4- and 10-weeks predicts disease progression at 6-months following TKI therapy in mRCC.

Corrigendum: Gastrointestinal Metastases From Primary Renal Cell Cancer: A Single Center Review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.644301.].

Gastrointestinal Metastases From Primary Renal Cell Cancer: A Single Center Review.

Introduction: Digestive metastases (DMs) from renal cell cancer (RCC) are rare. Over the past decade, the overall survival of metastatic RCC (mRCC) has been improved by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The main objective of this study was to assess the incidence of metastases of the digestive tract in this new field of treatment. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the clinical characteristics, prognosis, treatments used for DMs, and median time between the diagnosis of RCC or mRCC and DMs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected from all patients with mRCC between 2007 (the time of TKI was a standard of care) and 2019 was carried out at the Paoli-Calmettes Institute (Marseille, France). Computer research software using artificial intelligence (ConSoRe®) was used to identify patients and assess their characteristics. Results: Between January 2007 and December 2019, 11 out of 660 (1.6%) mRCC patients had metastases of the gastrointestinal tract. The median age was 62 years. Of the 11 patients, 81.8% experienced digestive bleeding or anemia. Only 2 patients were asymptomatic. The metastases were mainly duodenal (50%) and gastric (41.6%). The median time from cancer diagnosis and from metastatic disease to gastrointestinal metastasis was 4.3 years (3 months-19.2 years) and 2.25 years (0 days-10.2 years), respectively. Local treatment was performed in 38.5% of cases by endoscopy (60%), surgery (20%) and radiotherapy (40%) with success rates of 33, 100, and 50%, respectively. Etiological treatment was modified following the discovery of DM in 84.6% of the cases. The median survival was 1 year from the diagnosis of DM (13 days-9.4 years). Two patients were still alive 2.9 and 9.4 years after the diagnosis of DM. Conclusion: This is the largest monocentric retrospective analysis of DM in patients with RCC. It seems to be a rare and late event in the course of the disease. Local treatment combined with systemic treatment could improve survival. In the context of prolonged survival with the new based immunotherapy treatments in mRCC, we suggest that unexplained anemia or persistent digestive symptoms could be explored by endoscopy.

Clinical Activity of Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab has been approved for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the activity in non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from Cleveland Clinic and the University of Texas Southwestern who had received ipilimumab plus nivolumab for metastatic nccRCC from October 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively identified. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was administered in accordance with the CHECKMATE 214 trial. Imaging was obtained at baseline and every 12 weeks. The baseline patient characteristics, objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were identified. The median age was 59 years (range, 32-81 years), 77.8% were men, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (38%) or 1 (50%). The median treatment duration was 2.4 months (range, 0.7-12.3 months). The non-clear cell histologic types included 6 papillary, 5 chromophobe, 3 unclassified, 2 adenocarcinoma of renal origin, 1 translocation, and 1 medullary. Most had an intermediate (66%) or poor (22%) International Metastatic Database Consortium risk. The best objective response included 6 partial responses (PRs; 33.3%) and 3 with stable disease (16.7%). Of the patients with a PR, the median time to the best response was 3.0 months, and median duration of the PR was 4.3 months. The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months. All-grade TRAEs were noted in 11 patients (61.1%) and included colitis (22%), hepatotoxicity (16%), rash (11%), and fatigue (11%). Eleven patients (61%) had TRAEs requiring high-dose glucocorticoids (> 40 mg of prednisone equivalent daily). CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated objective responses and notable toxicity in patients with nccRCC.

Management of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer and Bone Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Previous research has suggested that patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) and bone metastases have a poorer prognosis compared to their counterparts with no skeletal involvement. Therefore, we analyzed the management and outcomes of such patients in our center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 35 consecutive patients who received systemic treatment, largely targeted therapy, for mRCC with bone metastases. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 25 months from the time of diagnosis of mRCC. The 5-year survival rate was 16%. Survival from diagnosis of mRCC was significantly worse in patients with bone metastases present at the start of first-line systemic therapy (median 13 months) compared to delayed metastases diagnosed later during the course of disease (46 months, p=0.01). Few patients (29%) were able to receive more than two lines of systemic therapy. Bone-only metastases were uncommon (11%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with mRCC and bone metastases have limited overall survival.