NSABP FB-10: a phase Ib/II trial evaluating ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported our phase Ib trial, testing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of T-DM1 + neratinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with ERBB2 amplification in ctDNA had deeper and more durable responses. This study extends these observations with in-depth analysis of molecular markers and mechanisms of resistance in additional patients. METHODS: Forty-nine HER2-positive patients (determined locally) who progressed on-treatment with trastuzumab + pertuzumab were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study. Mutations and HER2 amplifications were assessed in ctDNA before (C1D1) and on-treatment (C2D1) with the Guardant360 assay. Archived tissue (TP0) and study entry biopsies (TP1) were assayed for whole transcriptome, HER2 copy number, and mutations, with Ampli-Seq, and centrally for HER2 with CLIA assays. Patient responses were assessed with RECIST v1.1, and Molecular Response with the Guardant360 Response algorithm. RESULTS: The ORR in phase II was 7/22 (32%), which included all patients who had at least one dose of study therapy. In phase I, the ORR was 12/19 (63%), which included only patients who were considered evaluable, having received their first scan at 6 weeks. Central confirmation of HER2-positivity was found in 83% (30/36) of the TP0 samples. HER2-amplified ctDNA was found at C1D1 in 48% (20/42) of samples. Patients with ctHER2-amp versus non-amplified HER2 ctDNA determined in C1D1 ctDNA had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS): 480 days versus 60 days (P = 0.015). Molecular Response scores were significantly associated with both PFS (HR 0.28, 0.09-0.90, P = 0.033) and best response (P = 0.037). All five of the patients with ctHER2-amp at C1D1 who had undetectable ctDNA after study therapy had an objective response. Patients whose ctHER2-amp decreased on-treatment had better outcomes than patients whose ctHER2-amp remained unchanged. HER2 RNA levels show a correlation to HER2 CLIA IHC status and were significantly higher in patients with clinically documented responses compared to patients with progressive disease (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The following biomarkers were associated with better outcomes for patients treated with T-DM1 + neratinib: (1) ctHER2-amp (C1D1) or in TP1; (2) Molecular Response scores; (3) loss of detectable ctDNA; (4) RNA levels of HER2; and (5) on-treatment loss of detectable ctHER2-amp. HER2 transcriptional and IHC/FISH status identify HER2-low cases (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ and FISH negative) in these heavily anti-HER2 treated patients. Due to the small number of patients and samples in this study, the associations we have shown are for hypothesis generation only and remain to be validated in future studies. Clinical Trials registration NCT02236000.

Neratinib and Ado-Trastuzumab-Emtansine for Pre-treated and Untreated HER2-positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) remain limited. We previously reported central nervous system (CNS) activity for neratinib and neratinib-capecitabine. Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) when given in combination. In TBCRC 022's cohort 4, we examined the efficacy of neratinib plus T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive BCBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase II study, patients with measurable HER2-positive BCBM received neratinib 160 mg daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts (cohort 4A-previously untreated BCBM, cohorts 4B and 4C- BCBM progressing after local CNS-directed therapy without [4B] and with [4C] prior exposure to T-DM1). Cycle 1 diarrheal prophylaxis was required. The primary endpoint was the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) by cohort. Overall survival (OS) and toxicity were also assessed. RESULTS: Between 2018-2021, 6, 17, and 21 patients enrolled to cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C. Enrollment was stopped prematurely for slow accrual. The CNS objective response rate in cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3-77.7%), 35.3% (95% CI: 14.2-61.7%), and 28.6% (95% CI: 11.3-52.2%), respectively; 38.1-50% experienced stable disease for ≥6 months or response. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (22.7%). Median OS was 30.2 months (cohort 4A; 95% CI: 21.9, not reached [NR]), 23.3 months (cohort 4B; 95% CI: 17.6, NR), and 20.9 months (cohort 4C; 95% CI: 14.9, NR). CONCLUSION: We observed Intracranial activity for neratinib plus T-DM1, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects with neratinib. Our data provide additional evidence for neratinib-based combinations in patients with HER2-positive BCBM, even those who are heavily pre-treated.

Targeting HER2-mutant metastatic cervical cancer with neratinib: Final results from the phase 2 SUMMIT basket trial.

OBJECTIVE: HER2 mutations are associated with poor prognosis and are detected in 3-6% of cervical cancers. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had activity in several HER2-mutant cancer types in the phase 2 SUMMIT basket study. We present updated and final results from the cervical cancer cohort of SUMMIT. METHODS: Eligible patients had HER2-mutant, metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer progressing after platinum-based treatment for advanced/recurrent disease. Patients received neratinib 240 mg/day; loperamide was mandatory during cycle 1. Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. Duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 18 (81.8%) had endocervical adenocarcinoma; median two prior systemic chemotherapy regimens (range 1-4). The most common HER2 variant was S310F/Y mutation (n = 13; 59.1%). Four patients had confirmed partial responses (ORR 18.2%; 95% CI 5.2-40.3); 6 had stable disease ≥16 weeks (CBR 45.5%; 95% CI 24.4-67.8). Median DoR was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.6-12.3). Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 1.7-7.2). All-grade diarrhea (90.9%), nausea (54.5%), and constipation (54.5%) were the most common adverse events. Five patients (22.7%) reported grade 3 diarrhea. There were no grade 4 adverse events, no diarrhea-related treatment discontinuations, and two grade 5 adverse events, unrelated to neratinib: dyspnea (n = 1) and embolism (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Neratinib resulted in durable responses and disease control in patients with HER2-mutant metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer in SUMMIT. These findings support next-generation sequencing and tailored therapy for select patients with advanced cervical cancer. All responses occurred in patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma. Further assessment of neratinib in this setting is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01953926 (ClinicalTrials.gov), 2013-002872-42 (EudraCT).

Neratinib for HER2-positive breast cancer with an overlooked option.

Positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is associated with an increased risk of metastases especially those to the brain in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC). Neratinib as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor can prevent the transduction of HER1, HER2 and HER4 signaling pathways thus playing an anticancer effect. Moreover, neratinib has a certain efficacy to reverse drug resistance in patients with BC with previous HER2 monoclonal antibody or targeted drug resistance. Neratinib, as monotherapy and in combination with other therapies, has been tested in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings. Neratinib with high anticancer activity is indicated for the prolonged adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early BC, or in combination with other drugs including trastuzumab, capecitabine, and paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced HER2-positive BC especially cancers with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis to reduce the risk of BC recurrence. This article reviewed the pharmacological profiles, efficacy, safety, tolerability, and current clinical trials pertaining to neratinib, with a particular focus on the use of neratinib in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the CNS. We further discussed the use of neratinib for HER2-negative and HER2-mutant breast cancers, and mechanisms of resistance to neratinib. The current evidence suggests that neratinib has promising efficacy in patients with BC which is at least non-inferior compared to previous therapeutic regimens. The most common AE was diarrhea, and the incidence, severity and duration of neratinib-related grade 3 diarrhea can be reduced with loperamide. Of note, neratinib has the potential to effectively control and prevent brain metastasis in patients with advanced BC, providing a therapeutic strategy for HER2-positive BC.

Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for HR-positive, HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer: outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial.

BACKGROUND: HER2 mutations are targetable alterations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the SUMMIT basket study, patients with HER2-mutant MBC received neratinib monotherapy, neratinib + fulvestrant, or neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab (N + F + T). We report results from 71 patients with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC, including 21 (seven in each arm) from a randomized substudy of fulvestrant versus fulvestrant + trastuzumab (F + T) versus N + F + T. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+ HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy received N + F + T (oral neratinib 240 mg/day with loperamide prophylaxis, intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29 of cycle 1 then q4w, intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w) or F + T or fulvestrant alone. Those whose disease progressed on F + T or fulvestrant could cross-over to N + F + T. Efficacy endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Plasma and/or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected at baseline; plasma was collected during and at end of treatment. Extracted DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: ORR for 57 N + F + T-treated patients was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26% to 52%); median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0-15.1 months). No responses occurred in fulvestrant- or F + T-treated patients; responses in patients crossing over to N + F + T supported the requirement for neratinib in the triplet. Responses were observed in patients with ductal and lobular histology, 1 or ≥1 HER2 mutations, and co-occurring HER3 mutations. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA sequencing revealed acquisition of additional HER2 alterations, and mutations in genes including PIK3CA, enabling further precision targeting and possible re-response. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of N + F + T for HR+ HER2-mutant MBC after progression on CDK4/6is is clinically meaningful and, based on this study, N + F + T has been included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines. SUMMIT has improved our understanding of the translational implications of targeting HER2 mutations with neratinib-based therapy.

Establishment of a high-fidelity patient-derived xenograft model for cervical cancer enables the evaluation of patient's response to conventional and novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/m CC) often has poor prognosis owing to its limited treatment options. The development of novel therapeutic strategies has been hindered by the lack of preclinical models that accurately reflect the biological and genomic heterogeneity of cervical cancer (CC). Herein, we aimed to establish a large patient-derived xenograft (PDX) biobank for CC, evaluate the consistency of the biologic indicators between PDX and primary tumor tissues of patients, and explore its utility for assessing patient's response to conventional and novel therapies. METHODS: Sixty-nine fresh CC tumor tissues were implanted directly into immunodeficient mice to establish PDX models. The concordance of the PDX models with their corresponding primary tumors (PTs) was compared based on the clinical pathological features, protein biomarker levels, and genomic features through hematoxylin & eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, and whole exome sequencing, respectively. Moreover, the clinical information of CC patients, RNA transcriptome and immune phenotyping of primary tumors were integrated to identify the potential parameters that could affect the success of xenograft engraftment. Subsequently, PDX model was evaluated for its capacity to mirror patient's response to chemotherapy. Finally, PDX model and PDX-derived organoid (PDXO) were utilized to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of neratinib and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) combination strategy for CC patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutation. RESULTS: We established a PDX biobank for CC with a success rate of 63.8% (44/69). The primary features of established PDX tumors, including clinicopathological features, the expression levels of protein biomarkers including Ki67, α-smooth muscle actin, and p16, and genomics, were highly consistent with their PTs. Furthermore, xenograft engraftment was likely influenced by the primary tumor size, the presence of follicular helper T cells and the expression of cell adhesion-related genes in primary tumor tissue. The CC derived PDX models were capable of recapitulating the patient's response to chemotherapy. In a PDX model, a novel therapeutic strategy, the combination of ACT and neratinib, was shown to effectively inhibit the growth of PDX tumors derived from CC patients with HER2-mutation. CONCLUSIONS: We established by far the largest PDX biobank with a high engraftment rate for CC that preserves the histopathological and genetic characteristics of patient's biopsy samples, recapitulates patient's response to conventional therapy, and is capable of evaluating the efficacy of novel therapeutic modalities for CC.

The influence of verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in rats: the role of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux.

Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) early-stage and brain metastatic breast cancer. Thus far, the pharmacology effects and pharmacodynamics of neratinib have been well studied. However, the disposition of neratinib and its influencing factors in vivo remain unclear. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), one of the most extensively studied transporters, substantially restricts penetration of drugs into the body or deeper compartments (i.e., blood-brain barrier, BBB), regarding drug resistance and drug-drug interactions. Thereby, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of verapamil (a P-gp inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of neratinib in rats. Here, we have established a high specific, selective and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (UPLC-MS/MS) method to quantify plasma concentrations of neratinib in rats. Pharmacokinetic results showed that verapamil significantly increased the system exposure of neratinib, as Cmax increased by 2.09-fold and AUC0-t increased by 1.64-fold, respectively. Additionally, the in vitro transport of neratinib was evaluated using Madin-Darby canine kidney II (MDCK II) and human MDR1 gene overexpressed MDCK (MDCK-MDR1) cell line models. As a result, the net flux ratio was over than 2 and decreased over 50% by verapamil, suggesting that neratinib was a substrate of P-gp. Hence, our findings have highlighted the important role of P-gp in the system exposure of neratinib in vivo, and drug-drug interaction should be considered when coadministration of P-gp inhibitors with neratinib. These findings may support the further clinical development and application of neratinib.

The Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib and pan-ErbB inhibitor neratinib are highly synergistic in HER2 overexpressing epithelial ovarian carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with the highest gynecologic cancer mortality. The development of novel, effective combinations of targeted therapeutics remains an unmet medical need. We evaluated the preclinical efficacy of the Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (olaparib) and the pan-ErbB inhibitor (neratinib) as single agents and in combination in ovarian cancer cell lines and xenografts with variable HER2 expression. METHODS: In vitro cell viability with olaparib, neratinib, and their combination was assessed using flow-cytometry based assays against a panel of OC primary cell lines with variable HER2 expression. Immunoblotting experiments were performed to elucidate the mechanism of activity and synergism. The in vivo antitumor activity of the olaparib/neratinib combination versus single agents was tested in HER2 positive xenograft OC models. RESULTS: HER2 + OC cell lines demonstrated higher sensitivity to olaparib and neratinib when compared to HER2 negative tumors (i.e., IC50: 2.06 ± 0.33 µM vs. 39.28 ± 30.51 µM, p = 0.0035 for olaparib and 19.42 ± 2.63 nM vs. 235.0 ± 165.0 nM, p = 0.0035 for neratinib). The combination of olaparib with neratinib was more potent when compared to single-agent olaparib or neratinib both in vitro and in vivo, and demonstrated synergy in all primary HER2 + OC models. Western blot experiments showed neratinib decreased pHER2/neu while increased Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) enzymatic activity; olaparib increased pHER2/Neu expression and blocked PAR activatio. Olaparib/neratinib in combination decreased both pHER2/Neu as well as PAR activation. CONCLUSION: The combination of olaparib and neratinib is synergistic and endowed with remarkable preclinical activity against HER2+ ovarian cancers. This combination may represent a novel therapeutic option for ovarian cancer patients with HER2+, homologous recombination-proficient tumors resistant to chemotherapy.

Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Is There an Optimal Sequence of Therapy?

OPINION STATEMENT: Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+), conferring a particularly aggressive subtype of the disease with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases. However, the advent of trastuzumab and more recently several other HER2-targeting novel therapies has led to significant improvements in the prognosis, making the diagnosis a "double-edged sword." The current standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trastuzumab deruxtecan should be used preferentially in the second line, with the only caveat being patients with CNS involvement where the tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab regimen could be considered. In the third line setting, given the survival benefits demonstrated with the tucatinib regimen in patients with and without CNS metastases, this is the preferred strategy. In the fourth line and beyond, there is no clear standard. Options include margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy, neratinib + capecitabine, or trastuzumab + chemotherapy. There are several novel therapies under investigation reporting promising results in the late-line setting. The treatment landscape of HER2-positive advanced disease is evolving constantly, with several active therapies being moved to the early-stage setting. Accordingly, it will be critical to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to optimize therapy selection and maximize patient outcomes and quality of life. Here, we provide an overview of the current and future management of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer and address the specific scenarios which may impact treatment selection including triple-positive breast cancer and the presence of brain metastases. Finally, we highlight promising novel treatments and ongoing trials that may impact future treatment sequencing.

Neratinib as adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer: expert opinion.

Neratinib is a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor used in the extended adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer. After adjuvant trastuzumab therapy, neratinib reduces the risk of recurrence and, if taken within 1 year from trastuzumab, significantly improves the invasive disease-free survival of patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer with no increased risk of long-term toxicity. Diarrhea, the most common adverse event associated with neratinib use, deters some clinicians from prescribing this drug. However, neratinib-related toxicity is predictable, short-lived, mostly limited to the first month of treatment and can be managed with dose-escalation and prophylactic strategies. Thus, close surveillance and prompt management, relying on supportive care and administration schedule modification, allows discontinuation of treatment to be avoided.

Optimization of a HPLC-UV bioanalytical method using Box-Behnken design to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of neratinib maleate in Wistar rats.

The current research work reports the development and validation of a sensitive, robust and reproducible bioanalytical method for quantifying neratinib maleate in rat plasma. More than 85% of the drug was extracted from the plasma samples by protein precipitation. The method was optimized using Box-Behnken design, a response surface method. The effect of three critical factors, viz., the pH of the buffer (X1 ), the aqueous phase proportion in the mobile phase (X2 ) and the mobile phase flow rate (X3 ), was studied on two response variables, retention time (Y1 ) and United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) width (Y2 ). With the highest overall desirability function value of 0.943, the obtained optimized method conditions were: X1  = 2.4 ± 0.1; X2  = 66.7 ml, and X3  = 0.85 ml/min. Under the optimized conditions, the values of Y1 and Y2 for a sample containing 1 ppm of the drug were found to be 14.1 min and 0.50 ± 0.003, respectively. Single-dose intravenous bolus (7.5 mg/kg) and oral (15 mg/kg) pharmacokinetic studies were performed to determine the absolute bioavailability of the drug. The optimized bioanalytical method was sensitive enough to capture 95% of the drug eliminated from the body. The absolute oral bioavailability of the drug was 49.30%.

Synergistic activity of neratinib in combination with olaparib in uterine serous carcinoma overexpressing HER2/neu.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer with a poor prognosis. Approximately 30% of USC overexpress HER2/neu, a recognized target for trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu-positive USC. We evaluated the efficacy of the pan-c-erb inhibitor neratinib and the poly (ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib as single agents and in combination against USC cell lines and xenografts. METHODS: In-vitro cell-viability assays with olaparib, neratinib, and olaparib/neratinib were assessed using flow-cytometry based assays against a panel of USC cell lines with high and low HER2/neu expression. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) signatures were evaluated as described by Alexandrov et al. (Nature;2020;578:94-101) while downstream signaling affected by neratinib/olaparib exposure was assessed with immunoblotting. Efficacy of single- versus dual-agent inhibition was evaluated in-vivo using two USC-xenografts with 3+ HER2/neu expression. RESULTS: Neratinib was more potent than olaparib in suppression of in-vitro growth of HER2/neu 3+ cell lines (ARK1: p = 0.0047; ARK2: p = 0.0428) while no difference was noted against HER2/neu 1+ tumors (ARK4). Importantly, the combination of olaparib with neratinib synergistically improved tumor suppression compared to either single-agent in vitro. USC cells exposed to olaparib upregulated HER2/neu expression, while neratinib treatment increased PARP activity (ARK1: p < 0.0001; ARK2: p < 0.0001). Single-agent neratinib transiently inhibited in vivo growth of USC xenografts harboring HER2/neu gene amplification (ARK1: p < 0.05; ARK2: p < 0.05). In contrast, the combination of the two inhibitors caused a stronger and durable growth inhibition in both USC xenografts (ARK1: p < 0.05; ARK2: p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of olaparib and neratinib is active and synergistic against primary HER2/neu + USC. This combination may represent a novel therapeutic option for USC patients with HER2/neu+, homologous recombination-proficient tumors resistant to chemotherapy.

MicroRNA-Mediated Drug Repurposing Unveiled Potential Candidate Drugs for Prolactinoma Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Prolactinomas, also called lactotroph adenomas, are the most encountered type of hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors in the clinic. The preferred first-line therapy is a medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs), mainly cabergoline, to reduce serum prolactin levels, tumor volume, and mass effect. However, in some cases, patients have displayed DA resistance with aggressive tumor behavior or are faced with recurrence after drug withdrawal. Also, currently used therapeutics have notorious side effects and impair the life quality of the patients. METHODS: Since the amalgamation of clinical and laboratory data besides tumor histopathogenesis and transcriptional regulatory features of the tumor emerges to exhibit essential roles in the behavior and progression of prolactinomas; in this work, we integrated mRNA- and microRNA (miRNA)-level transcriptome data that exploit disease-specific signatures in addition to biological and pharmacological data to elucidate a rational prioritization of pathways and drugs in prolactinoma. RESULTS: We identified 8 drug candidates through drug repurposing based on mRNA-miRNA-level data integration and evaluated their potential through in vitro assays in the MMQ cell line. Seven repurposed drugs including 5-fluorocytosine, nortriptyline, neratinib, puromycin, taxifolin, vorinostat, and zileuton were proposed as potential drug candidates for the treatment of prolactinoma. We further hypothesized possible mechanisms of drug action on MMQ cell viability through analyzing the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and cell cycle arrest via flow cytometry and Western blotting. DISCUSSION: We presented the transcriptomic landscape of prolactinoma through miRNA and mRNA-level data integration and proposed repurposed drug candidates based on this integration. We validated our findings through testing cell viability, cell cycle phases, and PI3K/Akt protein expressions. Effects of the drugs on cell cycle phases and inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway by all drugs gave us promising output for further studies using these drugs in the treatment of prolactinoma. This is the first study that reports miRNA-mediated repurposed drugs for prolactinoma treatment via in vitro experiments.

Whole-exome sequencing of cervical carcinomas identifies activating ERBB2 and PIK3CA mutations as targets for combination therapy.

The prognosis of advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients remains poor. We analyzed 54 fresh-frozen and 15 primary cervical cancer cell lines, along with matched-normal DNA, by whole-exome sequencing (WES), most of which harboring Human-Papillomavirus-type-16/18. We found recurrent somatic missense mutations in 22 genes (including PIK3CA, ERBB2, and GNAS) and a widespread APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern (TCW motif) in both adenocarcinoma (ACC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Somatic copy number variants (CNVs) identified 12 copy number gains and 40 losses, occurring more often than expected by chance, with the most frequent events in pathways similar to those found from analysis of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), including the ERBB2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR, apoptosis, chromatin remodeling, and cell cycle. To validate specific SNVs as targets, we took advantage of primary cervical tumor cell lines and xenografts to preclinically evaluate the activity of pan-HER (afatinib and neratinib) and PIK3CA (copanlisib) inhibitors, alone and in combination, against tumors harboring alterations in the ERBB2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (71%). Tumors harboring ERBB2 (5.8%) domain mutations were significantly more sensitive to single agents afatinib or neratinib when compared to wild-type tumors in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models (P = 0.001). In contrast, pan-HER and PIK3CA inhibitors demonstrated limited in vitro activity and were only transiently effective in controlling in vivo growth of PIK3CA-mutated cervical cancer xenografts. Importantly, combinations of copanlisib and neratinib were highly synergistic, inducing long-lasting regression of tumors harboring alterations in the ERBB2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. These findings define the genetic landscape of cervical cancer, suggesting that a large subset of cervical tumors might benefit from existing ERBB2/PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR-targeted drugs.

Hybrid solid-phase extraction to overcome interference due to phospholipids for determination of neratinib in human plasma using UPLC-MS/MS.

A reliable and robust bioanalytical method was developed to quantify neratinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in human plasma, using UPLC-MS/MS. The extraction of neratinib and its deuterated internal standard, neratinib-d6, was successfully performed on hybrid solid-phase extraction ultra-cartridges to remove the interference of phospholipids and proteins. Chromatographic analysis was performed on a UPLC BEH C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) column using 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile under gradient conditions. The total analysis time was 1.5 min. Neratinib was quantified using electrospray ionization source operated in the positive-ion multiple reaction monitoring mode. The mass transitions of neratinib and neratinib-d6 were m/z 557.3/112.1 and m/z 563.1/118.2, respectively. The linear concentration range for neratinib was 0.5-500 ng/mL, which adequately covers concentration levels expected in real subject samples. The assay was extensively validated for various validation parameters following standard guidelines for a bioanalytical assay. The intra- and inter-batch precision was ≤4.6%, and neratinib was found to be stable under various stability conditions. The mean internal standard-normalized matrix factor and recovery were 0.997 and 95.4%, respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy subjects with different doses.

Neratinib inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of acute myeloid leukemia cells by activating autophagy-dependent ferroptosis.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy with increased lethality. We focused on elucidating the role of Neratinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the progression of AML and identify the potential mechanisms. Upon the treatment of Neratinib, autophagy suppressor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) and ferroptosis stimulator Erastin, the viability and proliferation of HL-60 cells were evaluated by cell counting kit-8 and 5-Ethynyl-20-Deoxyuridine staining assays. A flow cytometer was to observe cell cycle and apoptosis. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was tested via 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate  assay. Additionally, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and Fe2+ activity were examined with commercial kits. LC3-II expression was examined by using immunofluoresence staining. Western blot analysis ascertained the expression of proliferation, apoptosis, ferroptosis and autophagy-associated proteins. It was noted that Neratinib notably mitigated cell viability and proliferation, cut down Ki67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression. Moreover, Neratinib hindered cell cycle at G0/G1 phase whereas exacerbated apoptosis. ROS, MDA and Fe2+ activities were elevated by Neratinib, coupled with the reduced glutathione peroxidase 4, ferritin heavy chain 1 expression and enhanced acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 expression. Furthermore, Neratinib promoted autophagy of HL-60 cells, evidenced by raised LC3-II, ATG5, Beclin1 expression and lessened p62 expression. Importantly, 3-MA eased the impacts of Neratinib on cell ferroptosis, proliferation and apoptosis, which were offset by further administration of Erastin. To conclude, Neratinib could suppress proliferation and promote apoptosis of HL-60 cells through autophagy-dependent ferroptosis.

The role of cell signaling in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in the regulation of tumor cell survival in response to sorafenib and neratinib.

The molecular mechanisms by which tumor cells survive or die following therapeutic interventions are complex. There are three broadly defined categories of cell death processes: apoptosis (Type I), autophagic cell death (Type II), and necrosis (Type III). In hematopoietic tumor cells, the majority of toxic stimuli cause these cells to undergo a death process called apoptosis; apoptosis specifically involves the cleavage of DNA into large defined pieces and their subsequent localization in vesicles. Thus, 'pure' apoptosis largely lacks inflammatory potential. In carcinomas, however, the mechanisms by which tumor cells ultimately die are considerably more complex. Although the machinery of apoptosis is engaged by toxic stimuli, other processes such as autophagy ("self-eating") and replicative cell death can lead to observations that do not simplistically correspond to any of the individual Type I-III formalized death categories. The 'hybrid' forms of cell death observed in carcinoma cells result in cellular materials being released into the extracellular space without packaging, which promotes inflammation, potentially leading to the accelerated re-growth of surviving tumor cells by macrophages. Drugs as single agents or in combinations can simultaneously initiate signaling via both apoptotic and autophagic pathways. Based on the tumor type and its oncogene drivers, as well as the drug(s) being used and the duration and intensity of the autophagosome signal, apoptosis and autophagy have the potential to act in concert to kill or alternatively that the actions of either pathway can act to suppress signaling by the other pathway. And, there also is evidence that autophagic flux, by causing lysosomal protease activation, with their subsequent release into the cytosol, can directly mediate killing. This review will discuss the interactive biology between apoptosis and autophagy in carcinoma cells. Finally, the molecular actions of the FDA-approved drugs neratinib and sorafenib, and how they enhance both apoptotic and toxic autophagic processes, alone or in combination with other agents, is discussed in a bench-to-bedside manner.

Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C). MATERIALS AND METHODS: NALA was a randomized, active-controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2-directed regimens for HER2-positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily) or L + C (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily) orally. Independently adjudicated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CNS endpoints were considered. RESULTS: Of 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS-directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59-1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2-positive MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2-directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression-free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2-positive brain metastases following antibody-based HER2-directed therapies.

Real-world evidence from a University Hospital system regarding the uptake of adjuvant pertuzumab and/or neratinib before and after their FDA approval.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib are independently FDA-approved for treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with or following trastuzumab for one year, respectively. Both agents reduce the risk of recurrence; however, the absolute benefit is modest for many patients with added risk of adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at four University of Colorado Health hospitals between July 2016 and April 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment, and administration of pertuzumab and/or neratinib were obtained. RESULTS: We identified a total of 350 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab for stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer; 253 (73.1%) had tumors that were ≥ T2 or node-positive disease. The rate of adjuvant pertuzumab use increased following FDA approval; pertuzumab was administered to the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant pertuzumab was associated with younger age, premenopausal status, and node-positive disease. Rates of administration of adjuvant neratinib were lower, with only 15.2% of patients receiving this therapy within 3 months of completing adjuvant trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients treated within a diverse healthcare network, the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer received adjuvant pertuzumab following FDA approval. The use of adjuvant neratinib was less common, potentially as a result of adverse effects, prolongation of therapy, previous administration of adjuvant pertuzumab, and modest benefit.

Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and ≥ 2 prior HER2-directed regimens.

PURPOSE: To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study. METHODS: In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points. RESULTS: Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32-2.23]). CONCLUSION: In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.